HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes1984-059
.
.
.
-
.
06/11/84
FBA/rsa
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
RESOLUTIUN NU. 84-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEWARD, ALASKA, FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTEREST WOULD NOT BE SERVED BY AN APPRAISAL
PRIOR TO DISPOSITION OJ<' THE GATEWAY
SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Seward,
Alaska, has repeatedly determined that development of the City of
Seward in an orderly manner is in the public interest, and
WHEREAS, numerous capital projects of the City of
Seward have been implemented in order to promote industrial
development of the City in order to assure steady rates of
employment and promote new industries, and
at the regular election
would be in the public
certain land within the
Gateway Subdivision by
of bonded indebtedness of
WHEREAS, the people of Seward
in October of 19 81 determined that it
interest to promote the development of
City limits commonly known as the
authorizing the issuance, if necessary,
the City for such development, and
WHEREAS, there is now a critical
residential building lots within the city
anticipates rapid residential growth as a
new industries locating in Seward, and
shortage of available
limits, and the City
result of the several
WHEREAS, public development of the Gateway Subdivision
would involve commitment of scarce public resources which are now
fully engaged in developing necessary public services, and
WHEREAS, the City Council offered, by public notice,
the opportunity for private firms to develop the Gateway
Subdivision in its Request for Proposals dated March 5. 1984 ,
and that process provided interested members of the publ ic and
the market generally to determine under what conditions and terms
development of the Gateway Subdivision could best take place.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, as follows:
Section I. The City Council determines that the
purposes to be served by an appraisal of the Gateway Subdivision
prior to its disposition have been adequately met by the Request
for Proposal process.
Section 2. The public interest would not be served by
requiring an appraisal of the property, and such a process would
substantially impede the required rapid development of the
property to meet the public need.
-1-
.
.
.
RESOLUTION No. 84-59 ~
.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEWARD, ALASKA, this ,I day of ~, 1984.
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Hilton, Swartz, Williams and Wilson
None
Cripps and Meehan
Gillespie
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZ,
POWELL & BRUNDIN
~ IZI~
Fred B. Arvidson, Attorney
(City
-2-