HomeMy WebLinkAbout08232011 City Council Work Session Notes - Budget Kickoff WORK SESSION NOTES ON BU � 1 ri (t
SOV K ; DY)
Purpose: _ ACV OK' tnis ( BWdF1
Present: Ki Ili•• chIY1qC,1', cohnci Members r s : I , VI a Fl 1 i
Oa: Cs CO I,U��� ,Na J1 4 . ; ( l en& e • . / t4
i�I •
< V/, 'and a rt-r -
C_Torn) Called by: 00+C.5 ''ime `1 GU Date
****************************** **********************
u1:31Meet uire`f
biCtOtA )1(Q9fi61 t r(h ply
(aha crud)
August 22, 2011
Discussion Outline
City of Seward
• Budget Policies
• Budget Goals
2012/2013 Biennial Budget Budget Assumptions
Policy Discussion & Administration Questions
Council Direction Council Comments& Direction
❖ Appendix
<Vx
14111.\
1 - GF Fund Balance Policy:
The City should maintain a level of undesignated fund
Budget Policies balance equal to at least 3-6 months' of expenditures and
transfers-out, in order to cover unanticipated revenue
statramottegungemyr shortfalls,and to provide an adequate level of reserves to
cover unforeseen needs and emergencies,as well as to cover
the potential shortfall of all other City funds.
(no proposed change)
1
August 22, 2011
0
IA - GF Fund Balance Policy: Status of Current Fund Balance Levels
1. When the level of undesignated fund balance is not within o Policy requires 3-6 months expenditures
the desired range,a plan should be developed to bring fund and transfers out in reserves
balance within the desired range within three years.
(no proposed change. Proposed budget will ensure fund balance
is within policy band.)
o Policy level: $2.8M to $5.7M
2. When the level of undesignated fund balance is below the
desired range,withdrawals from undesignated fund balance
should be limited to emergency purposes. a Current balance: "$2.5M (2.7 months)
(no proposed change)
o May need $300K additional reserves; goal
in budget is to bring within bands
1B - One-time Revenue Policy P4-N Status of One-Time Revenues
One-time revenues(such as grant administration fees,sales of 0 The City has not transferred one-time revenues to the
fixed assets,legal settlements,etc.)should not be utilized to fund Capital Acquisition Fund in more than ten years,due
ongoing expenditures,but should be used to fund capital repairs to failure to meet General Fund 3-6 months'reserve
and replacement. The use of one-time revenues to fund annual levels(except revenue sharing)
budgets promotes structural budget deficits in future years. To
the extent that the General Fund fund balance has reached 6 O Propose to transfer one-time Revenue Sharing to
months'of expenditures and transfers-out,one-time revenues will CAF in 2012/2013 as was done in 2011.
be allocated annually to the Capital Acquisition Fund.
Note:Revenue sharing from 2010 was used to begin repay Electric Fund for
(no proposed change) prior years'transfers to SMIC,etc.
2
•
• August 22, 2011
lc- Revenue Stabilization Account Police Status of Revenue Stabilization Acco10.
.
The City has established a revenue stabilization account to O This account is currently not funded
maintain a prudent level of financial resources to protect against u
the need to reduce service levels or raise taxes or fees due to D 10/o of annual revenue is goal=$925,737
temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted one-time
expenditures. The balance in this account should be equal to ten
percent of the General Fund's annual revenues. This level of
reserve is based on the City's increasing dependence on the
visitor industry for the generation of sales taxes,bed taxes,and
camping fees,as well as on State funding to fund general
government services.
(no proposed change)
Note: Purpose of this account is to provide revenue stability so that we do not
have to be as conservative in our revenue budget estimates. ra
411i.
2 - Debt Service Fund: Status of SMH Debt Fund •
Debt service funds are used to account for the accumulation of o Funded by transfers to City from LTC facility
resources for the payment of capital repairs and replacement,
a Used solely to pay bond debt
general long-term principal and interest,and related debt costs.
The City's hospital debt servicefund consists primarily of O Initial years anticipate surplus due to rebasing
proceeds from a 1%sales tax which are intended to cover methodology(may not materialize if State cuts to
hospital-related costs,including debt related to the hospital reimbursement rates persist)
construction bonds.The Seward Mountain Haven debt service
fund accounts for debt related to the issuance of revenue bonds a Crucial to retain surplus for out-years when
for the long-term care facility. reimbursement methodology does not pay for capital
a Balance 12/31/10=$1,925,681
(no proposed change) a Balance 8/20/11=$1,583,373
a Annual debt payments approx.$1.97 million „
3
August 22, 2011
Status of Hospital Debt Fund 2A- Hospital Capital Funding Policy:
o Utilizes 1%sales tax=$900K/yr. The City will transfer 5%of the previous full years' Fund
Balance Reserved for debt service to the hospital to fund
0 Cash Balance 12/31/10=$546,695 their annual capital budget. This transfer takes place only in
o Cash Balance 8/20/11=435,457 years where the debt service reserve fund maintains a
balance at least equal to the single years' highest debt
0 Principal payment due next in April,2012 service payments.
o Bond debt matures 4/1/2013(2012=$879K;2013=
$722K) (no proposed change)
O Using$134,704/yr.to repay SGH PERS (Status: No funding currently going to PSMC for capital needs since
fund balance not sufficient. Significant capital needs in 2013 and
0 SGH PERS Debt Balance 12/31/11=$1,374,859; ; beyond due to delays in funding capital--e.g.CT scanner,facility
matures 2026 • repairs and upgrades,bed expansion needs)
n Revenues pledged for SMH debt payments „
•
2B- Hospital PERS Payment Policy, , •\ 2C-Hospital Debt Service Reserve Policy:
The City made loan payments to PERS from this fund The City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved
and then borrowed from the Motor Pool and Electric for hospital bond debt service(equal to the highest years'
MRRF to repay this debt,and in years when there are principal and interest $879K)prior to utilizing reserves to repay
sufficient reserves in this fund, they may be used to PERS debt service or to fund the annual hospital capital budget
from this fund.Given that the hospital bonds will be paid off in
repay a portion of those loans. 2013,the necessity of this level of reserves is less critical over
time.
(no proposed change)
(Status: This Fund making annual payments of$134,704;balance (no proposed change)
owed 12/31/11=$1,374,859)
a 16
4
•
• August 22, 2011
I
2D-SMH Debt Service Reserve Policy: , 2E-Accrued Annual Leave Funding Policy:
The City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved The City created an internal service fund for the purpose of
for long-term care facility debt service(equal to the highest accumulating cash to pay for the accrued but unused portion
years'principal and interest-$1.97M). Due to the frequent
rebasing of reimbursement rates,as well as the potential for of annual leave for governmental fund employees. This
changes in the reimbursement methodology,the City finds it account is to be designated solely for the payment of
prudent to accumulate as much reserve in this account as
possible. This will hedge against future declines in accumulated leave.
reimbursement,as well as mitigate timing differences between
depreciation and debt lifecycles. The City will therefore not
spend these reserves on anything other than debt repayment. (no proposed change)
(no proposed change)
v u
3- Capital Acquisition Fund Policy:_ 3A- Limit on Allocation of Surplus:
The City will designate 50%of the previous years'annual The allocation of surplus funds from the General Fund to the
surplus(defined as the difference between revenues and Capital Acquisition Fund should occur only when the General
transfers-in,and expenditures and transfers-out)into the Capital
Acquisition Fund for the purpose of financingmajor capital Fund undesignated fund balance will continue to exceeds 3
maintenance and repairs(defined as items in xc ss of$20,000), months'reserves after the transfer is made.
in any year where the General Fund fund balance is within the
band of established polic levels.
(Propose to strike-out above sentence. See policy 3D-slide
#22-which specifies that 1))capital items are defined as (The purpose of this proposed change is to ensure that
expenditures in excess of$20K•and 2)Council
authorization for expenditures is at the$50K level,per General Fund reserves do not fall outside of the policy band
purchasing Code.) in order to make this transfer to the Capital Fund)
5
August 22, 2011
3B- Sales of General Fixed Assets: 3C- Recurring Fund Source for Capita -�
Revenues from the sales of general fixed assets The City should seek recurring funding sources to fund
(including land)should be added to the Capital capital so that capital spending is not given last priority
Acquisition Fund. in competing for limited financial resources.
(no proposed change)
(Status: the City has not identified a source of funds to fund
capital. State Revenue Sharing has been allocated to capital
(Proposed change also moves land sales revenue to the fund in 2011 and proposed for 20122013.)
reserved for Capital purchases.)
General Fixed Assets historic cost Q 12/31/10=$121 million
•
® 4A-Motor Pool Appropriation Control Pol :
3D—Cap.Acq.Fund Appropriation Control Policy:
Capital replacement funds are to be Motor Pool reserves should be preserved for the sole intended
purpose of replacing City heavy equipment and vehicles,based
restricted and distributed only for major on the established goals of minimizing fluctuations to annual
capital outlay expenses. S-ifiteCapital operating budgets,and exercising fiscal prudence in saving for
expenses are defined as those in excess of replacement of the City's fleet.
$20,000.;All expenditures from these funds (no proposed change)
in excess of$50,000 require approval by the
City Council. Status:
Cash balance 820/11=$787,363
Debt balance 8/20/11=$605,224
(The purpose of this proposed change is to make the dollar thresholds Asset historic cost=$5.3 million
consistent with the city manager's spending authority for items up to Loans receivable=$1.1 million
$50,000.) Upcoming need=$450K fire engine
Note: In 2010,discussed replacing word"should"with"will". No apparent
consensusto change.
6
August 22, 2011
0
4B-Loans from Motor Pool to other Funds: 4C-Equipment Replacement Schedule:
Loans from Motor Pool to the other funds will be The City has established a Fleet Replacement Policy
repaid with interest to the Motor Pool in order to to be approved by the City Council which allows for
safeguard the viability of the long-range vehicle the routine and timely replacement of City vehicles
and heavy equipment replacement plan. at a certain mileage interval per vehicle type, with
the primary goals of maximizing safety and trade-in
(no proposed change) values.
Status: Loan repayments are current. Loans receivable$1.1 (no proposed change)
million from SGH PERS($1.006M)and 50-ton boat lift
($125K).
Status-Fleet Replacement Policy established as part of Bird's enterprise fund
rate review,and has yet to be brought forward to the City Council for
approval
35 36
5 Enterprise Funds: J•' 5A-Annual Rate Review Policy
The City'senterprisefundsareusedtoaccountforoperations Rates should be reviewed annually to
•-- that are financed and operated inamannersimilartobusiness- determine if they are adequate to cover
like entities. It is the intent of the City Council that the cost of annual operating and capital costs, plus the
providing goods and services through an enterprise fund be
financed or recovered primarily through user fees. The City annual cost of depreciation.
maintains the following enterprise funds: Small Boat Harbor, Recommendations for annual rate
Seward Marine lndustnal Center,Parking,Electric,Water,and adjustments should be made biennially to
Wastewater. the City Council.
(Purpose of change is due to rate reviews being done now at the
time of biennial budget preparation. Previously stated that
"recommendations for rate adjustments should be made
annually to the City Council.")
3) 36
7
August 22, 2011
Status of annual rate reviews 5B—Enterprise Fund Depreciation Reserve Funds
o City has been reviewing rates biennially prior to budget The City has established a major repair and replacement
process fund(MRRF)for each of its major enterprise funds
o Annual rate changes included in budget (Small Boat Harbor,Electric,Water,and Wastewater).
o Reviews are now standard process
o CPI increase added to tariffs was critical (no proposed change)
o Rates insufficient to address critical and high-risk needs but
progress being made
a Last formal(third-party)rate review 1993,was not
implemented due to lack of political will
o Lack of support for full-blown rate reviews due to cost,but
needed
Status of Depreciation Funding
5C—Ent.Fund Depreciation Funding Policy: „.A.
Status:
The policy of the City shall be to fund a minimum of 100%of the • Harbor=$206,246 cash vs assets of$27 million(*a)
annual rate of depreciation,recognizing that failure to establish Annual contribution s/b min.SI.IM pa policy
adequate reserves for the replacement of plant and equipment
shifts the financial burden of such major repairs and replacement, • Electric=$423,889 cash vs assets of$56.3 million
Annual contribution s/b min.$1.4M pa policy
to future generations,creating an imbalance of inter-generational
equity. • Water=$4,019 cash vs assets of$9.1 million•
Annual contribution sib min.5204K pa policy
Note: This policy was changed from 50%to 100%in 2010 • Sewer=$112,115 cash vs assets of$12.1 million'
Annual contribution s/b min.5276K pa policy
•Ase vela.are at historic ci t;significantly low value than what it would catst to repins
asses,and elude s u slgraiable asses log haul).
(a)Hard,r capital renewal fa plus raw fish has ding eannarkul for harbor-related capital
beginning 2011.
8
• August 22, 2011
5C(1)-Depreciation Funding Policy,contd 1 5C(2)-Depreciation Funding Policy,contd
"Funding depreciation"is defined as either placing equivalent Exception: Where Council determines that a specific
cash into the MRRF Fund,or spending on capital repairs valued enterprise fund asset will not be replaced at ratepayer or
greater than$20,000,such that the total amount invested in major taxpayer cost,but will be replaced through grants,or not
maintenance and repair is at least 100%of the annual
depreciation. Investments in new infrastructure are not be replaced at all,it may be prudent not to fund
considered investments in capital for the purpose of depreciation depreciation on that item.
funding,since they do not replace existing infrastructure.
(no proposed change)
(no proposed change)
33
6A-General Policies(Tax Cap Policy): 5', -�,
Continue to support an increase in the Kenai
' Peninsula Borough sales tax cap above Budget Preparation
$500.
(no proposed change)
35 36
9
,
August 22, 2011
Previous Council suggestions implemented`
Previous Council
o Motor Pool—developed priority list for replacing
Direction Accomplished vehes/egro
o Energy improvements
O Developed plan to repay electric fund
a Customer service improvements (job descriptions revised,
online bill pay,new economic development position with UA)
Budget Goals -�
O Maintain current service levels and add new library/museum facility
Budget Goals 0 Present Council with balanced budget
0 Achieve General Fund reserves within policy band
IISMOMMAINOPUSift 0 Address growing deferred maintenance
O Address capital infrastructure needs
O Become self-sufficient in anticipation of declining federal/state
funding
o Protect long-term financial health of City
❑ Strengthen health of enterprise funds and meet critical and high-risk
capital needs;begin funding depreciation at achievable levels
❑ Restore motor pool contributions to maintain plan to replace
existing vehicles and heavy equipment
10
,
August 22, 2011
iRevenue Assumptions ,�
C Anticipate revenue levels for sales tax,camping,bed tax consistent with
2010 actual levels
Budget Assumptions ❑ Be conservative in revenue assumptions given lack of safety net
❑ Assume State revenue sharing of$228,933;one-time revenues to Capital
Acquisition Fund
a Continue search for ways to assess entities receiving services but not
paying
❑ During year-2 of biennial budget,identify potential revenue sources to fund
general government infrastructure and finalize Motor Pool equipment and
vehicle replacement policy
❑ New alcohol/tobacco tax will not be built into budget until after election
a Raw fish tax transferred from GF to Harbor as in 2010/2011
o Enterprise fund tariffs—CPI 5-yr.avg in 2012=2.8%;in 2013=$2.6%
o Implement rate review recommendations for enterprise funds
o Increase some recreation program and misc.General Fund fees
:1 411.
1 Cost Assumptions
o Non-discretionary cost increases don't exceed 1.8%
❑ Fill budget gap to fund library/museum capital and operating costs
Cost Assumptions a Storage needed for parking electric cars
❑ City pays costs of existing library and existing museum facilities(utilities,
etc.)pending alternative uses
o Purchase of fire truck thru 7-year capital lease
o Resume funding hospital capital budget when debt matures 2013
o New library/museum bonds begin in 2012
o New library/museum operating costs in 2012—personnel
a New library/museum operating costs in 2013—facility
o Chamber of commerce—50%of bed tax,per policy
a Same level of support to Senior Center as in 2011 budget
o Pass credit card convenience fees on to customers
❑ New accounting system and software
11
August 22, 2011
Administration Questions,
Personnel Assumptions
a Move harbor lease management to General Fund(Comm. Council Comments and
Development),and a portion of revenues to offset
a Business development position$25K in Comm.Develop. Direction
a Comm.Development Director position remains vacant
a New operator in Elec Fund paid with grant;train to replace
retiring operator
a Increase part-time library staff to full-time to assume
museum tasks
a Assume 1.8%cola for 2012;2.5%for 2013
a Health insurance cost increases—10%;maintain current
cost-share split between employer/employee
o State continues to pay PERS rate>22%
a If budget gap can't be filled with projected revenues
consider eliminating or consolidating positions(results in
reduction of services)
4s
Administration Questions: Administration Questions:
o How does Council intend to pay for library/museum bonds if
a Do you want us to sell old library building and land?
alcohol/tobacco tax fails? a Are there any City facilities you don't want to replace when
a Are you willing to consider reduced library hours or service they fail?
levels to pay increased operating costs? a Should we attempt to outsource operations at SMIC(250-
o Are there specific categories of services we must protect? ton lift,boat storage)?
o Are there specific services you do not want to continue to o 250-ton lift is at end of useful life;should we attempt to
provide? RFP operations and/or consider capital lease to buy new?
o Do you want us to consider sale of the electric utility? o If budget gap exists,should we contribute to Boys&Girls
o Do you want us to consider converting LTC bonds from Club and/or other non-profits?
non-taxable to taxable to open possibility of future sale of a Does Council want to assume ownership of Legends
LTC and hospital? Building assuming it is made available by Park Service?
o Should we reconsider special contract subsidies for ASLC
(electric)and Seward Fisheries(elec,water,harbor lease)?
o Should we consider optional ways to subsidize ASLC or
Seward Fisheries such as from General Fund rather than
enterprise funds?
47
12
August 22, 2011
Council Comments & Direction
Appendix:
Historical Info & Trends
.9 5°
III
,0._
Revenue History— sales tax -� Mill Rate History—property taxes
o Sales taximplemented March,1982 I%for hospital operations; i r p
general government if any left over — - p I=
o Rate increased from I%to 3%June,1986 to fund general "m— — — — —1 ''' °—•'5.• _ ® ® U
government
o Oct 1998 advisory vote to increase from 3%to 4%was not `m
approved. Stated purpose of increase:to establish Capital —
Improvement Trust Fund. I
0 2003 advisory vote to increase sales tax rate from 3%to 4%was 4.03
approved by voters. Voter education clearly stated purpose was to - — —
address increased costs rather than capital. m•
�'a�'a� �,.°� �'.o�>.:�.:�."�.��
O 2010 advisory vote to increase sales tax by 0.5%to fund
library/museum capital was not approved. o.m
°S.r Pani flood 5.5,4e 9ch of Hal
13
•
August 22, 2011
Why Reserves? 0 General Fund fund balance hist \
o City has no depreciation fund to cover 1
replacement of$75M governmental assets A `m°a°° '°
o General Fund must cover deficits in all other .°
funds; SMIC annual deficit— $82K after debt dec. _°
paid off • I
CI 030 t — —
Economic uncertainty 30. 1 „1
o Used to leverage grant dollars(matching) 2030°°° '
o Cover unforeseen needs/emergencies (flooding, t''t
avalanches,healthcare,ASLC,critical/high risk 1 .1: . �. .1. i '
unfunded needs in enterprise funds) 2000 2�' �' �° �°° °°° 2002000 °'° 20
""
o No capital fund to cover deferred maintenance
(roads, buildings,equip)or new capital
CPI Information:
Cash Balances in all funds s
CONSUMER 00(5 i.AEXNFORMA00N 1\
General Fond f 544Fj094 ten{a..Is 0.55r 30n.*t.nw6ew1955155 •
Available 2,881,811 COe3.43VSAO
Harbor Fund 605,477 i • Not Seasons:.,.2us0l.0000,.00.*K,u nems
eau Perna ee2.191a.10
Harbor Capital Projects 2,458,113
ay ma,.a
SMIC Fund (44,321) A,,,1, 0..113.
Parking Fund 373,092 CR CR mu ..i •
..1.1 ea
Electric Fund 192,157 2000 1080 'M. 0.203% 205. ,'tn%
MO' Ie0ZOO 21502, 310:3% 001 1'Nl
Electric Capital Projects 1,056,999 mm 1020 'pia 1191011 000% 1'N.
Water Fund 1,693,156 203 10300 2'100 .now 1.01. 1100•
2300 191 000 21{5% 2122 C.
0* 0000 13 0
Wares Capital Projects 121,504 2000 In... 3°011 213.1 000• 1300.
Sewer Fund 605,642 2000 1110 32011. 0001. 200• 1500.
Sewer Capital Projects 112,115 x11 1N Zee 2231* 531101. 30011 ,1100.•
1 2001 191 M. 951251. 3 D 2''0•
Motor Pool Fund 787,363 2000 194- 511*
tato to•.. '-0% ee200% 000. 3500.
Capital Projects(grants) (291,685) 20,1 2011 20 91•
Special Revenue Funds(grants) (89,764)
Hospital Debt Service (35,457) Enwpm.ruNI'r'Annual CMime.*
ilinsr300�viaLTC Debt Service 1,583,373 atel 200.2001001 %
TYC Agency Fund 39,980 21312.38d on 2016a0m CPO 2816
213 101110 00 2006-2010 CPU 201
Compensated Absences 457,188 ss ss
Total Cash Balance at 820/11 S 15,073,026 •0000101355
14
1,0(41-,ssioy,
tc t1- kick,off:)
CITY OF SEWARD
20'0/�z 2012/2013 BUDGET POLICIES
1. General Fund: The general fund is the general operating fund of the City of Seward,
funded primarily through taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and user fees. This fund
accounts for the current financial resources of the City which are not required by law or
administration action,to be accounted for in another fund.
A) Fund Balance Policy: The City should maintain a level of undesignated fund balance
equal to at least 3-6 months' of expenditures and transfers-out, in order to cover
unanticipated revenue shortfalls, and to provide an adequate level of reserves to cover
unforeseen needs and emergencies, as well as to cover the potential shortfall of all other
City funds.
1. When the level of undesignated fund balance is not within the desired range, a
plan should be developed to bring fund balance within the desired range within
three years.
2. When the level of undesignated fund balance is below the desired range,
withdrawals from undesignated fund balance should be limited to emergency
purposes.
B)One-time Revenue Policy:One-time revenues(such as grant administration fees,sales
of fixed assets, legal settlements,etc.)should not be utilized to fund ongoing expenditures,
but should be used to fund capital repairs and replacement. The use of one-time revenues
to fund annual budgets promotes structural budget deficits in future years. To the extent
that the General Fund fund balance has reached 6 months' of expenditures and transfers-
out,one-time revenues will be allocated annually to the Capital Acquisition Fund.
C) Revenue Stabilization Account: The City has established a revenue stabilization
account to maintain a prudent level of financial resources to protect against the need to
reduce service levels or raise taxes or fees due to temporary revenue shortfalls or
unpredicted one-time expenditures. The balance in this account should be equal to ten
percent of the General Fund's annual revenues. This level of reserve is based on the City's
increasing dependence on the visitor industry for the generation of sales taxes, bed taxes,
and camping fees,as well as on State funding to fund general government services.
2. Debt Service Fund: Debt service funds are used to account for the accumulation of
resources for the payment of capital repairs and replacement,general long-term principal_
and interest,and related debt costs. The City's Hospital Debt Service Fund consists
primarily of proceeds from a 1%sales tax which is intended to cover hospital-related
costs,including debt related to the hospital construction bonds.The new Seward
Mountain Haven Debt Service Fund will account for debt related to the issuance of
revenue bonds for the long-term care facility.
__- Formatted:None,Indent:Left: 0",Hanging:
0.5",Tab stops: 0.5",Left
r
CITY OF SEWARD
20x01-1201'7/2013 BUDGET POLICIES
A) Hospital Capital Funding Policy: The City will transfer 5% of the previous full
years' Fund Balance Reserved for Debt Service to the hospital to fund their annual capital
budget. This transfer takes place only in years where the debt service reserve fund
maintains a balance at least equal to the single years'highest debt service payments.
B) Hospital PERS Payment Policy: The City made loan payments to PERS from this
fund and then borrowed from the Motor Pool and Electric MRRF to repay this debt, and
in years when there are sufficient reserves in this fund,they may be used to repay a portion
of those loans.
C)Hospital Debt Service Fund-Recommended Fund Balance Reserve Policy: The
City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved for hospital bond debt service
(equal to the highest years'principal and interest—$878,500)prior to utilizing reserves to
repay PERS debt service or to fund the annual hospital capital budget from this fund.
Given that the hospital bonds will be paid off in 2013,the necessity of this level of
reserves is less critical over time.
D) Seward Mountain Haven Debt Service Fund— Fund Balance Reserve Policy:
The City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved for long-term care facility
debt service(equal to the highest years'principal and interest-$1,973,360). Due to the
frequent rebasing of reimbursement rates,as well as the potential for changes in the
reimbursement methodology,the City finds it prudent to accumulate as much reserve in
this account as possible. This will hedge against future declines in reimbursement,as well
as mitigate timing differences between depreciation and debt lifecycles. The City will
therefore not spend these reserves on anything other than debt repayment.
E) Accrued Annual Leave Funding Policy: The City created an internal service fund
for the purpose of accumulating cash to pay for the accrued but unused portion of annual
leave for governmental fund employees. This account is to be designated solely for the
payment of accumulated leave. .
3. Capital Acquisition Fund Policy:The City will designate 50%of the previous years'
annual surplus(defined as the difference between revenues and transfers-in,and
expenditures and transfers-out)into the Capital Acquisition Fund for the purpose of
financing major capital maintenance and repairs(defined as items in excess of$20,000),
•
CITY OF SEWARD
204012044 1012/2013 BUD('LFT POT I1IFS
in any year where the General Fund fund balance is within the band of established policy
levels. •-- - - •• • _ -.--. - . ..
A) Limit on Allocation of Surplus-The allocation of surplus funds from the General
Fund to the Capital Acquisition Fund should occur only when the General Fund
undesignated fund balance will continue to exceeds 3 months'reserves after the
transfer is made.
B) Sales of General Fixed Assets—Revenues from the sales of general fixed assets
(including land)should be added to the Capital Acquisition Fund.
C) Recurring Fund Source for Capital—The City should seek recurring funding sources
to fund capital so that capital spending is not given last priority in competing for
limited financial resources.
D)Capital Acquisition Fund Appropriation Control-Capital replacement funds are to
be restricted and distributed only for major capital outlay expenses. Since-eCapital
expenses are defined as those in excess of$20,000.,aAll expenditures from these
funds in excess of$50.000 require approval by the City CounciL
4. Motor Pool Internal Service Fund:The purpose of this fund is to establish a consistent
funding mechanism for the replacement of the City's fleet of heavy equipment,mobile
equipment,and vehicles. This mechanism minimizes the fluctuations to the annual
operating budget when purchasing replacement equipment,and recognizes the annual cost
of this equipment in each department's budget. The intent is to eventually fund all City
vehicles and heavy equipment through this fund.
A)Motor Pool Appropriation Control Policy:Motor Pool reserves should be preserved
for the sole intended purpose of replacing City heavy equipment and vehicles,based on the
established goals of minimizing fluctuations to annual operating budgets,and exercising
fiscal prudence in saving for replacement of the City's fleet.
B)Loans from the Motor Pool to other Funds will be repaid with interest to the Motor
Pool in order to safeguard the viability of the long-range vehicle and heavy equipment
replacement plan.
C. Equipment Replacement Schedule: The City has established a Fleet Replacement
Policy to be approved by the City Council,which will allow for the routine and timely
replacement of City vehicles at a certain mileage interval per vehicle type,with the primary
goals of maximizing safety and trade-in values.
A
CITY OF SEWARD
20-1440-14'111''/2013 BUDfcT POT I1'IES
5. Enterprise Funds: The City's Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that
are financed and operated in a manner similar to business-lilce entities. It is the intent of
the City Council that the cost of providing goods and/or services through an enterprise
fund be financed or recovered primarily through user fees. The City maintains the
following enterprise funds:Small Boat Harbor,Seward Marine Industrial Center,Parking,
Electric,Water,and Wastewater.
A)Annual Rate Review Policy:Rates should be reviewed annually to determine if they
are adequate to cover annual operating and capital costs,plus the annual cost of
depreciation. Recommendations for annual rate adjustments should be made annually
biennially to the City Council
B) Enterprise Fund Depreciation Reserve Funds(Major Repair and Replacement
Funds): The City has established a major repair and replacement fund(MRRF)for each of
its major enterprise funds(Small Boat Harbor, Electric,Water,and Wastewater).
C) Depreciation Funding Policy:The policy of the City shall be to fund a minimum of
100%of the annual rate of depreciation,recognizing that failure to establish adequate
reserves for the replacement of plant and equipment shifts the financial burden of such
major repairs and replacement,to future generations,creating an imbalance of inter-
generational equity.
1) `Funding depreciation'is defined as either placing equivalent cash into the
MRRF Fund,or spending on capital repairs valued greater than$20,000, such that the
total amount invested in major maintenance and repair is at least 100%of the annual
depreciation. Investments in new infrastructure are not considered investments in capital
for the purpose of depreciation funding,since they do not replace existing infrastructure.
2) Exception: Where Council determines that a specific enterprise fund asset will
not be replaced at ratepayer or taxpayer cost,but will be replaced through grants,or not
be replaced at all,it may be prudent not to fund depreciation on that item.
6. General Policies:
A)Tax Cap Policy: Continue to support an increase in the Kenai Peninsula Borough
sales tax cap above$500.
August 22, 2011
City of Seward
2012/2013 Biennial Budget
Policy Discussion &
Council Direction
Discussion Outline
•:• Budget Policies
• Budget Goals
• Budget Assumptions
• Administration Questions
• Council Comments & Direction
• Appendix
z
1
August 22, 2011
Budget Policies
1 - GF Fund Balance Policy:
Y
The City should maintain a level of undesignated fund
balance equal to at least 3-6 months' of expenditures and
transfers-out, in order to cover unanticipated revenue
shortfalls, and to provide an adequate level of reserves to
cover unforeseen needs and emergencies, as well as to cover
the potential shortfall of all other City funds.
(no proposed change)
4
2
August 22, 2011
1A - GF Fund Balance Policy:Y
1. When the level of undesignated fund balance is not within
the desired range, a plan should be developed to bring fund
balance within the desired range within three years.
(no proposed change. Proposed budget will ensure fund balance
is within policy band.)
2. When the level of undesignated fund balance is below the
desired range, withdrawals from undesignated fund balance
should be limited to emergency purposes.
(no proposed change)
s
Ct
Status of Current Fund Balance Levels.
Policy requires 3-6 months expenditures
and transfers-out in reserves
Policy level: $2.8M to $5.7M
Current balance: N$2.5M (2.7 months)
May need $300K additional reserves; goal
in budget is to bring within bands
3
r ,
August 22, 2011
1B - One-time Revenue Policy:
Y
One-time revenues (such as grant administration fees, sales of
fixed assets, legal settlements, etc.)should not be utilized to fund
ongoing expenditures, but should be used to fund capital repairs
and replacement. The use of one-time revenues to fund annual
budgets promotes structural budget deficits in future years. To
the extent that the General Fund fund balance has reached 6
months' of expenditures and transfers-out, one-time revenues will
be allocated annually to the Capital Acquisition Fund.
(no proposed change)
Status of One-Time Revenue;
9 The City has not transferred one-time revenues to the
Capital Acquisition Fund in more than ten years, due
to failure to meet General Fund 3-6 months' reserve
levels (except revenue sharing)
o Propose to transfer one-time Revenue Sharing to
CAF in 2012/2013 as was done in 2011.
Note: Revenue sharing from 2010 was used to begin repay Electric Fund for
prior years'transfers to SMIC,etc.
a
s
8
4
August 22, 2011
1C - Revenue Stabilization Account Poli `
The City has established a revenue stabilization account to
maintain a prudent level of financial resources to protect against
the need to reduce service levels or raise taxes or fees due to
temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted one-time
expenditures. The balance in this account should be equal to ten
percent of the General Fund's annual revenues. This level of
reserve is based on the City's increasing dependence on the
visitor industry for the generation of sales taxes,bed taxes, and
camping fees, as well as on State funding to fund general
government services.
(no proposed change)
Note: Purpose of this account is to provide revenue stability so that we do not
have to be as conservative in our revenue budget estimates. 9
Status of Revenue Stabilization Account
This account is currently not funded
n 10% of annual revenue is goal = $925,737
I
5
August 22, 2011
2 - Debt Service Fund:
Debt service funds are used to account for the accumulation of
resources for the payment of capital repairs and replacement,
general long-term principal and interest, and related debt costs.
The City's hospital debt service fund consists primarily of
proceeds from a 1% sales tax which are intended to cover
hospital-related costs, including debt related to the hospital
construction bonds. The Seward Mountain Haven debt service
4
fund accounts for debt related to the issuance of revenue bonds
for the long-term care facility.
(no proposed change)
11
I
Status of SMH Debt Fund
Funded by transfers to City from LTC facility
u Used solely to pay bond debt
❑ Initial years anticipate surplus due to rebasing
methodology (may not materialize if State cuts to
reimbursement rates persist)
a Crucial to retain surplus for out-years when
reimbursement methodology does not pay for capital
❑ Balance 12/31/10 = $1,925,681
— Balance 8/20/11 = $1,583,373
u Annual debt payments approx. $1.97 million
12
6
August 22, 2011
A-•
Status of Hospital Debt Fund
❑ Utilizes 1% sales tax = $900K /yr.
❑ Cash Balance 12/31/10 = $546,695
❑ Cash Balance 8/20/11 = -$35,457
❑ Principal payment due next in April, 2012
❑ Bond debt matures 4/1/2013 (2012 = $879K; 2013 =
$722K)
Using $134,704/yr. to repay SGH PERS
SGH PERS Debt Balance 12/31/11 = $1,374,859;
matures 2026
Revenues pledged for SMH debt payments 13
t
2A - Hospital Capital Funding Policy:
The City will transfer 5% of the previous full years' Fund
Balance Reserved for debt service to the hospital to fund
their annual capital budget. This transfer takes place only in
years where the debt service reserve fund maintains a
balance at least equal to the single years' highest debt
service payments.
(no proposed change)
(Status: No funding currently going to PSMC for capital needs since
fund balance not sufficient. Significant capital needs in 2013 and
beyond due to delays in funding capital -- e.g. CT scanner, facility
repairs and upgrades, bed expansion needs)
14
7
August 22, 2011
2B - Hospital PERS Payment Policy:''" .'
The City made loan payments to PERS from this fund
and then borrowed from the Motor Pool and Electric
MRRF to repay this debt, and in years when there are
sufficient reserves in this fund, they may be used to
repay a portion of those loans.
(no proposed change)
(Status: This Fund making annual payments of$134,704; balance
owed 12/31/11 = $1,374,859)
15
2C - Hospital Debt Service Reserve Policy:
The City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved
for hospital bond debt service (equal to the highest years'
principal and interest —$879K) prior to utilizing reserves to repay
PERS debt service or to fund the annual hospital capital budget
from this fund. Given that the hospital bonds will be paid off in
2013,the necessity of this level of reserves is less critical over
time.
(no proposed change)
16
8
August 22, 2011
2D - SMH Debt Service Reserve Policy:
The City will maintain a minimum level of fund balance reserved
for long-term care facility debt service (equal to the highest
years' principal and interest— $1.97M). Due to the frequent
rebasing of reimbursement rates, as well as the potential for
changes in the reimbursement methodology, the City finds it
prudent to accumulate as much reserve in this account as
possible. This will hedge against future declines in
reimbursement, as well as mitigate timing differences between
depreciation and debt lifecycles. The City will therefore not
spend these reserves on anything other than debt repayment.
(no proposed change)
17
2E - Accrued Annual Leave Funding Policy:
The City created an internal service fund for the purpose of
accumulating cash to pay for the accrued but unused portion
of annual leave for governmental fund employees. This
account is to be designated solely for the payment of
accumulated leave.
(no proposed change)
9
August 22, 2011
3 - :Capital Acquisition Fund Policy:
l' q Y
The City will designate 50%of the previous years' annual
surplus (defined as the difference between revenues and
transfers-in, and expenditures and transfers-out) into the Capital
Acquisition Fund for the purpose of financing major capital
maintenance and repairs (defined as items in excess of$20,000),
in any year where the General Fund fund balance is within the
band of established policy levels. . . - - . . - . .
(Propose to strike-out above sentence. See policy 3D - slide
#22 - which specifies that 1) capital items are defined as
expenditures in excess of $20K; and 2) Council
authorization for expenditures is at the $50K level, per
purchasing Code.)
19
y
3A - Limit on Allocation of Surplus:
The allocation of surplus funds from the General Fund to the
El Capital Acquisition Fund should occur only when the General
Fund undesignated fund balance will continue to exceeds 3
months' reserves after the transfer is made.
(The purpose of this proposed change is to ensure that
General Fund reserves do not fall outside of the policy band
in order to make this transfer to the Capital Fund)
20
i 1
10
August 22, 2011
3B - Sales of General Fixed Assets:
Revenues from the sales of general fixed assets
(including land) should be added to the Capital
Acquisition Fund.
(Proposed change also moves land sales revenue to the fund
reserved for Capital purchases.)
21
3C - Recurring Fund Source for Capita :
The City should seek recurring funding sources to fund
capital so that capital spending is not given last priority
in competing for limited financial resources.
(no proposed change)
(Status: the City has not identified a source of funds to fund
capital. State Revenue Sharing has been allocated to capital
in 2011 and proposed for 2012/2013.)
General Fixed Assets historic cost L 12/31/10=$121 million
11 22
11
•
August 22, 2011
3D - Cap. Acq. Fund Appropriation Control Policy:
Capital replacement funds are to be
restricted and distributed only for major
capital outlay expenses. Since Capital
expenses are defined as those in excess of
$20,000.7 All expenditures from these funds
in excess of $50,000 require approval by the
City Council.
(The purpose of this proposed change is to make the dollar thresholds
consistent with the city manager's spending authority for items up to
$50,000.)
23
4A - Motor Pool Appropriation Control Polk
Motor Pool reserves should be preserved for the sole intended
purpose of replacing City heavy equipment and vehicles, based
on the established goals of minimizing fluctuations to annual
operating budgets, and exercising fiscal prudence in saving for
replacement of the City's fleet.
(no proposed change)
Status:
Cash balance 8/20/11 =$787,363
Debt balance 8/20/11= $605,224
Asset historic cost= $5.3 million
Loans receivable=$1.1 million
Upcoming need= $450K fire engine
Note: In 2010, discussed replacing word "should"with"will". No apparent 24
consensus to change.
12
August 22, 2011
4B - Loans from Motor Pool to other Funds:
Loans from Motor Pool to the other funds will be
repaid with interest to the Motor Pool in order to
safeguard the viability of the long-range vehicle
and heavy equipment replacement plan.
(no proposed change)
Status: Loan repayments are current. Loans receivable $1.1
million from SGH PERS ($1.006M) and 50-ton boat lift
($125K).
4C - Equipment Replacement Schedule: •
The City has established a Fleet Replacement Policy
to be approved by the City Council which allows for
the routine and timely replacement of City vehicles
at a certain mileage interval per vehicle type, with
the primary goals of maximizing safety and trade-in
values.
(no proposed change)
Status - Fleet Replacement Policy established as part of Bird's enterprise fund
rate review, and has yet to be brought forward to the City Council for
approval
26
13
August 22, 2011
5 Enterprise Funds:
The City's enterprise funds are used to account for operations
that are financed and operated in a manner similar to business-
like entities. It is the intent of the City Council that the cost of
p providing goods and services through an enterprise fund be
financed or recovered primarily through user fees. The City
maintains the following enterprise funds: Small Boat Harbor,
Seward Marine Industrial Center, Parking, Electric, Water, and
Wastewater.
27
5A - Annual Rate Review Policy
Rates should be reviewed annually to
determine if they are adequate to cover
annual operating and capital costs, plus the
annual cost of depreciation.
Recommendations for annual rate
adjustments should be made biennially to
the City Council.
(Purpose of change is due to rate reviews being done now at the
time of biennial budget preparation. Previously stated that
"recommendations for rate adjustments should be made
annually to the City Council.")
28
14
August 22, 2011
Status of annual rate reviews
n City has been reviewing rates biennially prior to budget
process
I ❑ Annual rate changes included in budget
❑ Reviews are now standard process
a CPI increase added to tariffs was critical
a Rates insufficient to address critical and high-risk needs but
3progress being made
, o Last formal (third-party) rate review 1993, was not
implemented due to lack of political will
o Lack of support for full-blown rate reviews due to cost,but
needed
29
iiii
5B — Enterprise Fund Depreciation Reserve Fun
The City has established a major repair and replacement
fund (MRRF) for each of its major enterprise funds
(Small Boat Harbor, Electric, Water, and Wastewater).
(no proposed change)
15
•
August 22, 2011
5C - Ent. Fund Depreciation Funding l'
The policy of the City shall be to fund a minimum of 100%of the
annual rate of depreciation, recognizing that failure to establish
adequate reserves for the replacement of plant and equipment
shifts the financial burden of such major repairs and replacement,
to future generations, creating an imbalance of inter-generational
equity.
Note: This policy was changed from 50% to 100% in 2010
Status of Depreciation Funding
Status:
■ Harbor=$206,246 cash vs assets of$27 million(*a)
Annual contribution s/b min.$1.1M per policy
• Electric=$423,889 cash vs assets of$56.3 million*
Annual contribution s/b min.$1.4M per policy
• Water=$4,019 cash vs assets of$9.1 million*
Annual contribution s/b min.$204K per policy
• Sewer=$112,115 cash vs assets of$12.1 million*
Annual contribution s/b min.$276K per policy
*Asset values are at historic cost;significantly less value than what it would cost to replace
assets,and exclude non-depreciable assets(e.g.land).
(a)Harbor capital renewal fee plus raw fish tax being earmarked for harbor-related capital
beginning 2011. 32
16
August 22, 2011
5C(1) - Depreciation Funding Policy, contd1
"Funding depreciation" is defined as either placing equivalent
cash into the MRRF Fund, or spending on capital repairs valued
greater than$20,000, such that the total amount invested in major
maintenance and repair is at least 100%of the annual
depreciation. Investments in new infrastructure are not
considered investments in capital for the purpose of depreciation
funding, since they do not replace existing infrastructure.
i (no proposed change)
33
5C(2) - Depreciation Funding Policy, contd ,
Exception: Where Council determines that a specific
enterprise fund asset will not be replaced at ratepayer or
taxpayer cost, but will be replaced through grants, or not
be replaced at all, it may be prudent not to fund
depreciation on that item.
(no proposed change)
34
17
August 22, 2011
6A - General Policies (Tax Cap Policy):
Continue to support an increase in the Kenai
Peninsula Borough sales tax cap above
$500.
(no proposed change)
35
Budget Preparation
35
18
August 22, 2011
Previous Council
Direction Accomplished
3?
b
Previous Council suggestions implemented
o Motor Pool—developed priority list for replacing
vehicles/equip
o Energy improvements
o Developed plan to repay electric fund
o Customer service improvements (job descriptions revised,
online bill pay, new economic development position with UA)
19
August 22, 2011
Budget Goals
39
�t.
Budget Goals
❑ Maintain current service levels and add new library/museum facility
o Present Council with balanced budget
❑ Achieve General Fund reserves within policy band
❑ Address growing deferred maintenance
❑ Address capital infrastructure needs
n Become self-sufficient in anticipation of declining federal/state
funding
u Protect long-term financial health of City
o Strengthen health of enterprise funds and meet critical and high-risk
capital needs; begin funding depreciation at achievable levels
o Restore motor pool contributions to maintain plan to replace
existing vehicles and heavy equipment
40
20
August 22, 2011
Budget Assumptions
Revenue Assumptions
0
❑ Anticipate revenue levels for sales tax,camping,bed tax consistent with
2010 actual levels
a Be conservative in revenue assumptions given lack of safety net
o Assume State revenue sharing of$228,933;one-time revenues to Capital
Acquisition Fund
a Continue search for ways to assess entities receiving services but not
paying
During year-2 of biennial budget,identify potential revenue sources to fund
general government infrastructure and finalize Motor Pool equipment and
vehicle replacement policy
o New alcohol/tobacco tax will not be built into budget until after election
❑ Raw fish tax transferred from GF to Harbor as in 2010/2011
a Enterprise fund tariffs—CPI 5-yr.avg in 2012=2.8%;in 2013=$2.6%
a Implement rate review recommendations for enterprise funds
o Increase some recreation program and misc.General Fund fees
42
(_____
21
August 22, 2011
Cost Assumptions
9
Cost Assumptions
❑ Non-discretionary cost increases don't exceed 1.8%
❑ Fill budget gap to fund library/museum capital and operating costs
o Storage needed for parking electric cars
O City pays costs of existing library and existing museum facilities(utilities,
etc.)pending alternative uses
Purchase of fire truck thru 7-year capital lease
Resume funding hospital capital budget when debt matures 2013
1 New library/museum bonds begin in 2012
L New library/museum operating costs in 2012—personnel
o New library/museum operating costs in 2013—facility
o Chamber of commerce—50%of bed tax,per policy
o Same level of support to Senior Center as in 2011 budget
o Pass credit card convenience fees on to customers
• New accounting system and software
22
August 22, 2011
Personnel Assumptions
Move harbor lease management to General Fund (Comm.
Development), and a portion of revenues to offset
Business development position $25K in Comm. Develop.
Comm. Development Director position remains vacant
New operator in Elec Fund paid with grant; train to replace
retiring operator
Increase part-time library staff to full-time to assume
museum tasks
Assume 1.8% cola for 2012; 2.5% for 2013
Health insurance cost increases — 10%; maintain current
cost-share split between employer/employee
State continues to pay PERS rate > 22%
If budget gap can't be filled with projected revenues,
consider eliminating or consolidating positions (results in
reduction of services)
45
Administration Questions,
Council Comments and
Direction
46
23
August 22, 2011
Administration Questions:
How does Council intend to pay for library/museum bonds if
alcohol/tobacco tax fails?
Are you willing to consider reduced library hours or service
levels to pay increased operating costs?
Are there specific categories of services we must protect?
Are there specific services you do not want to continue to
provide?
Do you want us to consider sale of the electric utility?
Do you want us to consider converting LTC bonds from
non-taxable to taxable to open possibility of future sale of
LTC and hospital?
Should we reconsider special contract subsidies for ASLC
(electric) and Seward Fisheries (elec, water, harbor lease)?
Should we consider optional ways to subsidize ASLC or
Seward Fisheries such as from General Fund rather than
enterprise funds?
47
Administration Questions:
Do you want us to sell old library building and land?
Are there any City facilities you don't want to replace when
they fail?
Should we attempt to outsource operations at SMIC (250-
ton lift, boat storage)?
250-ton lift is at end of useful life; should we attempt to
RFP operations and/or consider capital lease to buy new?
If budget gap exists, should we contribute to Boys & Girls
Club and/or other non-profits?
Does Council want to assume ownership of Legends
Building assuming it is made available by Park Service?
48
24
August 22, 2011
Council Comments & Direction
49
Appendix:
Historical Info & Trends
50
25
August 22, 2011
Revenue History — sales tax
❑ Sales tax implemented March, 1982 1%for hospital operations;
general government if any left over
❑ Rate increased from 1%to 3%June, 1986 to fund general
government
❑ Oct 1998 advisory vote to increase from 3%to 4%was not
approved. Stated purpose of increase: to establish Capital
Improvement Trust Fund.
❑ 2003 advisory vote to increase sales tax rate from 3%to 4%was
approved by voters. Voter education clearly stated purpose was to
address increased costs rather than capital.
❑ 2010 advisory vote to increase sales tax by 0.5%to fund
library/museum capital was not approved.
51
a._„
Mill Rate History — property tax ;
12.00 18.10117.601 17.101
— 16.60 1 16.601 117.10 17.101 17.101
10.00— — — _ — 6-°° Is.aol 15.001 15*8.00— — — --
I 6.00---
— —
4.00
3.121 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.121 7.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12.1 3.12 3.121-
2.00—. - - __.._ _., —1
0.00 • . ,
iuw '11111 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20118x1
OKenai Peninsula Borough and Flood Svc Area •City of Sewmd
52
26
August 22, 2011
Why Reserves?
City has no depreciation fund to cover
replacement of $75M governmental assets
General Fund must cover deficits in all other
funds; SMIC annual deficit N $82K after debt
paid off
Economic uncertainty
Used to leverage grant dollars (matching)
Cover unforeseen needs/emergencies (flooding,
avalanches, healthcare, ASLC, critical/high risk
unfunded needs in enterprise funds)
No capital fund to cover deferred maintenance
(roads, buildings, equip) or new capital 53
General Fund fund balance history
8,000,000 — - —5.0
7,000,000 - " —4.5
40
6,000,000
r - 35
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2000000 -
1000,000 1
2000 7001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 200/ 2008 2000 2010 2011Bul
�Undesignaled Fund Balance Total Fund Balance . Expend Rurec 8 T.F Out
27
August 22, 2011
Cash Balances in all funds
General Fund S 5,4485194
Available 2,881,811
Harbor Fund 605,477
Harbor Capital Projects 2,458,113
SMIC Fund (44,321)
Parking Fund 373,092
Electric Fund 192,157
Electric Capital Projects 1,056,999
Water Fund 1,693,156
Water Capital Projects 121,504
Sewer Fund 605,642
Sewer Capital Projects 112,115
Motor Pool Fund 787,363
Capital Projects(grants) (291,685)
Special Revenue Funds(grants) (89,764)
Hospital Debt Service (35,457)
LTC Debt Service 1,583,373
TYC Agency Fund 39,980
Compensated Absences 457.188 55
Total Cash Balance at 8/20/11 $ 15,073,026
CPI Information:
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX INFORMATION:
htty: data.bls.eov PDQ sen let Sun evOutoutSen let
CUUSA427SA0
Not Seasonally Adjusted-Anchorage,AK,All Items
Base Period: 1982-1984=100
Cay of Seward
Annual Cu ubtive Annual Cunuhttve
Year CPI CR COLA COLA•
2000 150.900 1.685% 34203% 2.50% 11.60%
2001 155.200 2.850% 37.053% 0.00% 11.60%
2002 158200 1.933% 38.986% 0.00% 11.60%
2003 162.500 2.718% 41.704% 1.40% 1300%
2004 166.700 2.585% 44288% 0.00% 1300%
2005 171.800 3.059% 47.348% 0.00% 13.00%
2006 177.300 3201% 50549% 2.60% 15.60%
2007 181.237 2221% 52.770% 3.00% 18.60%
2008 189.497 4.558% 57.327% 2.50% 21.10%
2009 191.744 1.186% 58.513% 4.50% 25.60%
2010 195.144 1.773% 60286% 0.00% 25.60%
2011 1.20% 26.80%
Enterprise Fund Tariff Annual CPI hcrease:
2010(based on 2003-2007 CPI): 2.8%
2011(based on 2004-2008 CPI): 3.1%
2012(based on 2005-2009 CPI): 2.8%
2013(based on 2006-2010 CPI): 2.6%
56
beginning 1987
28