Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09072022 PACAB Meeting Packet
Port & Commerce Advisory Board Agenda Packet Regular Meeting Wednesday, September 7, 2022 City Cound I Chambers 12.00 p.m. The City of Seward, Alaska SEWARD PORT AND COMMERCE ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING AGENDA eptember 7, 2022 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers Brandii Holmdahl 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Term Expires July, 2023 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Lynda Paquette 3. ROLL CALL Vice Chair Term Expires July, 2024 4. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE Bruce Jaffa ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING Board Member Term Expires July, 2024 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA [Approval of Consent Agenda passes all routine items indicated by asterisk (*). Consent Agenda Carl Hughes items are not considered separately unless a council member so requests. In the event Board Member of such a request, the item is returned to the Regular Agenda] Term Expires July, 2023 6. SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS Benjamin Smith Board Member A. Proclamations and Awards — None Term Expires July, 2025 Fred Woelkers B. Administration Report .............................................................Pg. 3 Board Member Term Expires July, 2024 C. Other Reports and Announcements - [Reports must be submitted to the city clerk no later than noon on the Tuesday preceding the Monday meeting for Dwayne Atwood inclusion in the packet. Five (5) minutes speaking time will be allowed for each Board Member report.] Term Expires July, 2025 1. Chamber of Commerce Report by Executive Director Kat Sorensen Stephen Sowell D. Presentations - None Assistant City Manager Norm Regis Harbormaster Brenda Ballou City Clerk 1 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — None 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Other New Business Items * 1. Approve the May 4, 2022 PACAB Regular Meeting Minutes...............................................Pg. 50 *2. Approve the June 8, 2022 PACAB Regular Meeting Minutes...............................................Pg. 54 3. Nominate and elect a Chair to serve through July, 2023........................................................Pg. 59 4. Nominate and elect a Vice Chair to serve through July, 2023...............................................Pg. 59 5. Discuss the status of the Heat Loop Project...........................................................................Pg. 60 6. Discuss the Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Bench Housing Feasibility Report....Pg. 117 9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS [No Action Required] A. PACAB Meeting Schedule................................................................................................Pg. 131 B. PACAB Priorities & Goals...............................................................................................Pg. 133 10. CITIZEN COMMENTS [There is no sign in for this commentperiod. Time is limited to five (5) minutes per speaker.] 11. BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION COMMENTS & RESPONSE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS 12. ADJOURNMENT `a Assistant City Manager Stephen Sowell ➢ Parks and Recreation staff and the Assistant City Manager met with Victus Advisors on Friday July 8t" to discuss the Recreation Center Feasibility Study. A copy of the draft report is included in the CMR as well. Please note that the information presented is a draft copy and as such, the results and information is not finalized. Victus continues their work on the project and plans to present the final report on September 28t" ➢ Work on the Feasibility Study for the SMIC Bench Project has continued. Please see the attached report from R&M Engineering on this project. Council will be receiving a presentation on September 26t" from R&M Engineering on this project and I would encourage PACAB members to attend as well to see this information. This has the potential for making a huge impact on housing in Seward. 3 Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Bench Draft Development Feasibility Study Prepared for: City of Seward 410 Adams St Seward, AK 99664 Date: June 2022 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 ExistingConditions Overview.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Opportunities& Constraints...................................................................................................................................................4 LandUse & Zoning.............................................................................................................................................................. 4 IntendedLand Use..........................................................................................................................................................4 Zoning.............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 DevelopmentRequirements........................................................................................................................................... 6 Required Public Improvements...................................................................................................................................... 7 Geotech............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Access.................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Utilities.............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 WaterSource................................................................................................................................................................ 10 WaterTreatment.......................................................................................................................................................... 10 WaterStorage............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Water Transmission & Distribution.............................................................................................................................. 11 Sewer Collection, Treatment & Disposal...................................................................................................................... 11 Electric and Communications....................................................................................................................................... 12 Total Order of Magnitude Utility Development Costs.................................................................................................. 12 TsunamiCenter Site Potential.......................................................................................................................................... 13 DevelopmentConcept.......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Overview........................................................................................................................................................................... 13 ConceptDesign................................................................................................................................................................. 13 FeasibilitySummary.............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Attachments 1. SMIC Bench Concept 2. SMIC Bench Concept Phase 1 Roadway Alignments M Introduction The City of Seward is exploring development opportunities for its vacant land to meet community needs and advance their vision and goals. Part of their land inventory includes an 1,828.5-acre parcel on the east side of resurrection Bay near the Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC). Fourth of July Creek and its tributaries created a natural northern and southern divide of the parcel. The northern portion of the parcel has been identified as a potential development opportunity and the City of Seward has authorized R&M Consultants, Inc. to assess its feasibility. The following feasibility study provides an overview of the SMIC Bench property being considered for development, identifies opportunities and constraints of the site, and presents development concepts based on the goals of the project and municipal code requirements. Conclusions and recommendations made in this study are based on desktop analysis conducted by certified surveyors, engineers and planners and are considered conceptual. Existing Conditions Overview Parcel ID: 14532003 Legal Description: Tract G, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision No. 2, according to Plat No. 98-04, Seward Recording District, Alaska. Located within T 1S R 1E & 1W SEC 7, 8, 17, 18, 12, & 13 Physical Address: 700 Nash Road The City of Seward is considering the development feasibility of the portion of the SMIC Bench property generally adjacent to Nash Road, north of the Spring Creek Correctional Center, and west of Godwin Creek. Physical constraints including steep slopes and the presence of intermittent or permanent streams are driving the feasibility study area boundary (see cover image). Size of Study Area: 833 acres, approximately (full parcel is 1,828.5 acres) Zoning: Resource Management — partially developable lands subject to floodplains and steep slopes. Land Use: Vacant land that is anecdotally used for recreation (recreation occurs north of the SMIC Bench parcel on USDA Forest Service land for the Godwin Glacier Overlook trail). Utilities: Utilities do not extend into SMIC Bench area. Water and sewer lines exist within a closed system between the SMIC harbor and prison facilities; no sewer lines are present on Nash Road, however, city water is available at the base of the mountain. Overhead electric lines are present along Nash Road adjacent to the SMIC Bench study area, and underground lines are present on the Spring Creek Correctional Center property. Opportunities & Constraints Land Use & Zoning Intended Land Use The City of Seward is experiencing an ongoing housing shortage for seasonal and year-round residents and it is a priority of the Community Development Department and City Council to identify areas for residential development. SMIC Bench is being considered as a potential development site for a new residential neighborhood. Depending on the feasibility of development and anticipated housing units, additional public or commercial land uses could be desirable or needed within the SMIC Bench area. Non-residential uses may include parks and recreation, a school or other institutional land uses, home occupation or other small commercial or office uses, restaurants or other food establishments. Access for recreation is anticipated to accompany any development of SMIC Bench, as public lands are adjacent to the City' property and the topography, viewsheds and environment make it highly attractive for year-round recreational pursuits. If access up the mountain to the bench can be established, the topography and amount of available city -owned land would be supportive of a trail network. Development of a trail system should take into consideration access and parking, wayfinding, maintenance, management, intended uses and sustainable design and construction of trails. Establishment of a recreational trail system could increase the attractiveness and marketability of housing developments at SMIC Bench and provide a new destination to be enjoyed by Seward residents. Zoning Zoning districts create the framework for regulating land use within the City of Seward. Each zoning districts has allowable land uses and associated development requirements. SMIC Bench is zoned Resource Management (RM). Resource Management — considered principally public The RM district is defined by City of Seward Code Title 21.05.025(b)13. as lands which are generally undeveloped and cannot be precisely zoned due to inadequate information on the extent of public services and utilities; the suitability of the land to support commercial, residential, industrial or public uses; and other possible environmental considerations. To effectively support the desired development at SMIC Bench, rezoning the area to one or more of the following zoning districts may be considered based on the City's desired use and intensity of the land: (1) Rural residential district (RR). Intended to provide for stable, quiet, low density (one or two dwelling units per acre) detached single-family residential development, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district including recreational, religious and educational facilities of an appropriate scale and design complementary to the neighborhood character. (2) Single-family residential district (R1). Intended to provide for stable and quiet low to medium density (one to five dwelling units per acre) detached, single-family residential development, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district. (3) Two-family residential district (R2). Medium density (one to seven dwelling units per acre) transitional housing area with a mix of single and two-family units, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district. (4) Multi -family residential district (R3). Intended to provide opportunities for a higher density residential setting with a mix of housing units which are predominately multi -family units close to concentrations of public services, employment and/or recreation. This district may provide a transition between more intensive districts and lower density residential areas if sufficient screening and design features are provided to protect multi- family residences from undesirable effects. (5) Urban residential district (UR). Intended to allow an area of higher density mixed residential uses from detached single-family housing to multi -family apartments in conjunction with compatible low impact professional office uses in the area surrounding the downtown business district. Residential development has been identified as the primary land use for a SMIC Bench development to address the identified need for additional housing units. The preferred residential density (units per lot, lots per acre, etc.) will be determined by market preferences and the anticipated availability and costs of utilities, roadways and lot development. The following tables summarizes potential land uses allowed in applicable zoning districts. Table 1. Summary of Residential Land Uses by Zoning District, per City of Seward Code 15.10.226 Residential Land Use Zoning Districts RM RR R1 R2 R3 UR Apartment, efficiency or accessory Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Apartment, studio Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Attached single-family townhouse, row Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Condominium Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Detached single-family Conditional Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Group Home Conditional Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Guest House Conditional I Permitted Permitted Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Two-family or duplex Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Multi -family (3 or more) Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Table 2. Summary of Non -Residential Land Uses by Zoning District per City of Seward Code 15.10.226 Zoning Districts RM RR 1111 R2 R3 UR Non -Residential Land Use Grocery, convenience store Prohibited Permitted Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Home occupation Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Home rental on a nightly Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Admin. Admin. basis Lodging, B&B, rooms, duplex Permitted/ Permitted/ Permitted/ Permitted/ Permitted/ Prohibited and accessory apartment admin admin admin admin admin Lodging, multifamily Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted dwelling apartment Office, home professional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Planning Unit Development Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Prohibited Playground, public tot lot Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Restaurant, food service, Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited catering, brew put School, public/private Prohibited Conditional Conditional Conditional Conditional Conditional elementary/secondary Wind Energy Conservation Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted System Development Requirements City of Seward Land Use Code, Title 15, defines dimensional standards by zoning district that limit the range of possible subdivision configurations. The following table provides the dimensional standards required by zoning district: Table 3. Summary of City of Seward Code Table 15.10.222 Development Requirements Zoning Districts RM RR 1111 & R2 R3 UR Dimensional Requirements Maximum Building Height (ft.) 34 34 34 34 34 Minimum Buildable Lot Size (ft.) Varies 3,000 Varies 3,000 Varies 3,000 *Note 2.B, 2.E, 2.F. 20,000 20,000 to 7,000 to 9,000 to 9,000 Minimum Lot Width (ft.) 100 100 Varies 30 to Varies 30 to Varies 30 to 60 90 90 Minimum Front Yard Setback (ft.) 20 20 20 20 20 5 min. each Minimum Side Yard Setback (ft.) 10 10 side with 15 10 5 total Minimum Side Yard Setback Adjacent to Street (ft.) 20 10 10 10 10 Minimum Rear Yard Setback (ft.) 10 10 10 10 10 Maximum Accessory Building Height (ft.) 34 20 20 20 20 Maximum Lot Coverage (%) *Note 2G 100 30 35 40 40 *Note 2E. Multiple -family developments (except studio apartments) with three or more units require a minimum of 9,000 SF in the R3, UR, OR Districts and 20,000 SF in the RIM District *Note 2F. Two -Family or duplex developments require a minimum of 6,000 SF in the R2, R3, UR, OR, AC and CB Districts and 20,000 SF in the RIM District. Duplex developments within the Federal Addition Subdivision require 5,000 SF. All other development requirements of this chapter shall be met. *Note 2.G. Multiple -Family, studio apartments in the OR, AC, CB, HC, I and RIM districts require a minimum of 9,000 SF. The total square footage required for lot setbacks shall be reserved as open area. All other requirements set forth in this chapter shall be met. Required Public Improvements City of Seward Subdivision Code, Title 16 identified required public improvements that must meet identified minimum standards for a subdivision to be approved by the City. 16.05.010 Required Public Improvements: 1. Streets: minimum requirements are a 50' width and gravel surface. 2. Telephone and electric lines: must be underground. 3. Water system: the subdivider shall provide the water system in accordance with the specifications established by the city planning and zoning commission and affirmed by the city council. Fire hydrants shall be provided to standards established by the American Waterworks Association and shall be a brand specified by the city. The subdivider shall not be required to drill individual wells. 4. Sewer system: Where the city sewer system will service the area covered by the plat or proposed plat, the subdivider shall provide the sewer system in compliance with all applicable state and federal health and environmental laws and regulations. 5. Street lighting: Street lighting shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the city. In addition to the City of Seward Code, minimum standards contained in the Kenai Peninsula Borough Code under Title 20 must be met. Some requirements are more stringent in the KPB Code, and any deviation from the code requires a waiver. Geotech Based on the review of available geotechnical reports', geologic maps', and LIDAR data3, the surficial geology of the subject site is expected to consist of thin soil deposits overlying bedrock. The thickness of soil deposits is expected to be generally less than 5 feet, and exposed bedrock is likely present in many areas, particularly on the steeper slopes. In flat areas bog deposits are expected consisting of saturated organic material and perched groundwater. The bedrock is mapped as the Valdez Group, composed of interlayered sandstone and phyllite. Actual bore holes have not been drilled on site to confirm the information gathered from existing sources. ' R&M consultants, Inc., Nash Road Extension Geologic Evaluation, November 1980. z Tysdal, R.G., and Case, J.E., Geologic Map of the Seward and Blying Sound Quadrangles, Alaska, USGS Map 1-1150, 1979. 3 https:Hgis.kpb.us/map/index.html?viewer=terrain it$] Landslide risk at the subject site is considered low due to the thin soil and lack of evidence of past landslide activity. Excavations for road construction and site development are likely to encounter bedrock and may require blasting. The subject site is not expected to be suitable for conventional on -site wastewater disposal. Access The current access to the SMIC Bench area is via Nash Road, a paved road that extends around the east side of the bay and into Seward. There are currently no roads that access the SMIC Bench area and this feasibility study addresses the various issues and costs associated with constructing an access road up the mountain. Two primary constraints have been identified for development in this area: the steepness of the terrain and the presence of shallow bedrock. The slopes adjacent to Nash Road vary, but are consistently over 30 percent, with many areas up to 80 percent. The Kenai Peninsula Borough Code Title 14 Streets and Sidewalks, Roads and Trails Chapter 14.06 Road Standards identifies the following construction requirements for roadways: • 14.06.160 Road Construction Standards —Alignments: A. Vertical alignment. Roads shall be constructed in a manner such that grades shall not exceed, at any point, six percent on arterial roads and ten percent on all other roads, and no more than four percent within 100 ft. of any intersection. We have assumed that the access road to SMIC Bench would not be an arterial road and can be constructed to a maximum of ten percent. Two potential alignments connecting Nash Road with the SMIC Bench have been identified (see Figure 1). The main access alignment recommended accesses the northern portion of the developable bench area. The alignment switches back to maintain the ten percent requirements and is approximately 6,000 feet long. Because of the slopes along this alignment, no new lots can be created along the alignment until the top of SMIC Bench is reached. Secondary access would be provided via a 7,600-foot-long road originating at Nash Road and extending to the southern portion of the development. The road is designed to fit completely within the existing City of Seward tract so that no additional agreements are required with other property owners to build and maintain the road. The second impediment to construction is the shallow bedrock. Bedrock is good for stability, and dramatically decreases the chances of landslides, however, it increases the cost of road and site construction because it needs to be blasted rather than dug. It also precludes the use of traditional on -site sewer and water system that make the development of individual lots simpler and cheaper (see Utilities section below). Steep slopes and shallow bedrock add significant costs to road and utility construction for the project. is Erl I 7 'Cou F, M PLAT Ntj,5-4. V I I I I I IT Figure 1. Conceptual Roadway Alignments from Nash Rd. toSMICBench Development im Utilities Providing public water and sewer to homes on the SMIC bench requires construction of significant infrastructure relative to the number of parcels being served. This section evaluates utility requirements in concept, including how improvements can be constructed in phases while supporting the future full build -out. Water Source The SMIC Bench development depends on the development of a water source with adequate quality and capacity. Based on the desktop geotechnical assessment of the bench study area, the high bedrock makes well development expensive. Depending on source aquifer hydrology, groundwater production, and water quality, wells on the bench may be entirely infeasible. The following solutions for providing the SMIC bench with water were considered: 1. Develop additional high production capacity public groundwater well(s) near existing city wells. Potential impacts to existing groundwater wells served by shared aquifer would need to be evaluated further. 2. Develop high -capacity public groundwater well(s) on bench — capacity and water quality are likely not adequate due to shallow bedrock and lack of water producing aquifers in bedrock. If a water source on the bench were deemed viable, it could be more cost efficient, depending on the well depth required through bedrock. This should be confirmed by geotechnical or hydrologic study. 3. Develop private groundwater wells on individual parcels. These are subject to the same challenges listed in #2 above. 4. Develop a surface water impoundment and water intake structure in nearby creek— not likely to be viable and will be influenced by climate conditions. This would require a new WTP be constructed on the SMIC bench. Booster pumps may also be required for source water transmission/distribution. 5. Connect to existing city water distribution network located at the bottom of the mountain south of Nash Road. This option requires constructing pumping stations to pump the water up the mountain, and large storage facilities on the SMIC Bench to store the water once on site. Water Treatment The existing water treatment plant (WTP) located near the correctional center serves a limited number of city customers in the area. The WTP will require expansion, modernization, and improvements to support the additional water demand presented by the SMIC bench. The WTP should be improved to increase output capacity and meet current water treatment regulatory requirements. The existing WTP should be further evaluated for its condition and suitability for expansion, improvement, or replacement. Water Storage Water storage tank(s) (WST) would likely need to be provided for the SMIC Bench development to serve anticipated community peak demands, emergency storage, and fire flows for the area. The tanks should be placed at an elevation which the system can provide minimum pressures to higher elevation homes. This may require dedicated access and a WST site higher than the development, approximate elevation of 1,200'. 13 Water use and storage requirements are estimated based on the following design criteria: a. 3-bedroom residential homes b. 100 gal/capita/day c. School/commercial daily use (35k gpd) d. 3 days emergency storage. The water storage tank site can be developed to support the phased development. A smaller 0.5 million -gallon (mGal) tank will be constructed for Phase 1, with future expansion area reserved for the full build -out 1.5 mGal water storage tank. Water Transmission & Distribution Water must be supplied to the SMIC bench development to fill the WST and provide distribution system pressures. To supply treated water from the source well/WTP (elevation 100'+) to the bench/WST (elevation 1,200+), a series of booster stations supplying high-pressure transmission mains would be required. The booster pumps could be vault style or in above -grade structures. A high-pressure transmission main would be constructed. The SMIC Bench development parcel elevations range from approximately 700' to 1,050' which will likely require two or more hydraulic pressure zones managed by city pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations to maintain service pressures within the pressure range allowable by Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) and the city code utility tariffs. Alternatively, homes could be supplied with in -home PRVs or booster pumps, but limitations exist due to the elevation differences. The following improvements will be required: 1. Booster Station and high-pressure transmission main from source wells/WTP to bench WST. 2. Intermediate booster stations for water transmission to SMIC bench along access road. 3. Pressure reducing valve stations to manage service pressures throughout bench development. Sewer Collection, Treatment & Disposal Due to the number of parcels, their density, topography, and size of the proposed parcels, on -site septic systems are not practical or suitable for wastewater disposal. On site -treatment and disposal for each lot is limited by the presence of groundwater, topography, and geotechnical conditions and must comply with minimum separation distances. Installation per lot would be approximately $30,000, and ongoing electricity and maintenance costs will be incurred by individual private property owners. Advanced on -site treatment systems (Advantex or similar) for individual parcels could be considered as an interim solution but these are not the most cost-effective design for the full SMIC build -out. A public sewer collection system maintained and operated by the city is recommended. Sewage would be collected at a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The WWTF would provide for the secondary treatment of wastewater via mechanical processes. Final effluent disposal discharge quality parameters and wastewater effluent discharge receiving waters should be evaluated further. A WWTP requires active and ongoing facility management and maintenance including sludge disposal, electricity costs, replacement and servicing of parts, and presents additional energy costs to the city. Another alternative to the WWTP was considered. This alternative would pipe wastewater down the hill and discharge into the existing city sewer lagoon. The lagoon would require expansion approximately doubling its footprint, and 14 associated improvements/upgrades. Due to the high-pressure sewer mains, wastewater pressure reducing stations are required. In -line hydro turbines could be considered to recapture potential energy, generate electricity, and supply power to the grid offsetting energy consumption by the booster stations. The improvements presented carry additional O&M costs and responsibility for the city public works department. The concept design goals and assumptions are subject to change as the site is investigated further and the project evolves. Electric and Communications Overhead electric is present along Nash Road adjacent to the SMIC Bench study area. Its capacity, condition, and suitability for serving the full build -out of the SMIC bench is unknown. Roadway lighting and other amenities on the SMIC bench may be considered. The City power utility is expected to provide conceptual costs and designs to provide electrical and communications service to the SMIC bench. Total Order of Magnitude Utility Development Costs Table 4 summarizes an order of magnitude cost estimate for providing water and sewer service to 750 parcels in the SMIC Bench "full build -out". The order of magnitude cost estimates should be updated as design assumptions evolve, and more information becomes available. Annual O&M and energy costs for operation of the water and sewer facilities are not included in this estimate and should be considered in a net present worth evaluation of project feasibility. Table 4. Full Build -Out Utility Expansion Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate SMIC Bench Feasibility Study - Utility Expansion - Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate Full Build -Out This cost estimate is a preliminary concept order of magnitude level of completion only. Estimator's contingency is intended to cover engineering and construction requirements not readily apparent at the concept level of evaluation, inflation, and escalation of construction costs. Work Description Unit Quantity I Unit Costj Cost Water Source, Treatment, Storage, Distribution Water Source Well Development Lump Sum 1 $250,000 S 250,000 Water Treatment Plant Lump Sum 1 S5,000,000 S 5,000,000 Treated Water Storage Tank Gallons 1.500,000 S4 S 5,250,000 Water Booster Station Each 3 S1,000,000 S 3,000,000 Water Transmission Mains Linear Foot 8,500 $325 S 2,762,500 Water Distribution Mains Linear Foot 19,000 $250 S 4,750,000 Pressure Reducing Valve Station Each 2 $450,000 S 900,000 Subtotal Water $ 21,912,500 Sewer Collection and Treatment Gravity Sewer Collection System Linear Foot 19,000 1 S275 S 5,225,000 Wastewater Treatment Facility Lump Sum 1 1 S16.000,000 S 16,000,000 Subtotal Sewer $ 21,225,000 Electrical Service and Communications Electric and Communications Service (Verify with Electric Utility) Estimator's Contingency (25%)l $ 10,784,375 Total Order of Magnitude Estimated Cost $ 54,000,000 W Tsunami Center Site Potential The City of Seward is within a tsunami hazard zone. Currently there is no tsunami refuge location east of the Seward Hwy, resulting in people at the correctional center, SMIC harbor area, and residential neighborhoods accessed via Nash Road having to travel to the Seward Hwy and north to evacuate. If a significant earthquake event were to compromise the bridge on Nash Road, access to the Seward Hwy would not be possible. The SMIC Bench study area is at an elevation above the areas of potential impact for tsunami events and therefore presents an opportunity for a tsunami refuge location. Preliminary research to identify grant funding opportunities to mitigate this hazard revealed that new road construction intended to facilitate emergency evacuation was not an eligible use of funding through the existing hazard mitigation programs. Development Concept Overview The concept design shown in this report is a portion of Tract G, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, Number 2, according to Plat No. 98-04, Seward Recording District, Alaska. Contours were obtained from publicly available LiDAR data from the Kenai Peninsula Borough GIS. The terrain within Tract G is very steep, which makes construction of an access road up the mountain to reach the SMIC Bench challenging. In addition, the Kenai Peninsula Borough (KPB) code stipulates, in 14.06.080 — Road Construction Standards -Construction categories, that a road that serves greater than 50 lots is designated as a Category IV road and cannot exceed 10% slope. Design concepts are based on all rights of way being 60 feet wide, with road slopes at, or less than, a 10% slope. In addition to the steep slopes, the soils in the area are shallow, and most of the site is expected to be near -surface bedrock. This means that all road construction will include a fair amount of blasting, which increases the overall construction costs. The north access road that connects the proposed subdivision with Nash Road will need to be approximately 6,000 feet long, with switch backs to accommodate the slope limits. A secondary access road will need to be constructed to meet secondary access requirements for subdivisions over 30 lots. The estimated cost of the road construction from Nash Road to the beginning of the proposed subdivision is $2,000 per linear feet of road. This does not include water and sewer but does include ditches and lighting. Individual lot development is also limited by steep slopes. In general, slopes up to 20% are developable, but slopes between 20% and 30% require additional effort and money to develop. Slopes over 30% require specialty measures to develop. The concept lots shown attempt to keep the slopes within individual lots at 20% or less, however, some lots are in slopes that exceed this due to necessity. Lot development is also hampered by the near -surface bedrock. This site condition inhibits the use of on -site sewer and water. Instead, the water will need to be pumped up the hill and stored in tanks at the top. A specialized sewer treatment system will also be required as typical leach fields do not work in bedrock. Concept Design The concept design features lots with a minimum area of 10,500 square feet. This size accommodates City of Seward code requirements for single family, duplexes, and multi -family houses. In general, for this type of terrain, more lots are needed to offset the high costs of road and utility construction. This design creates approximately 674 lots and requires ill approximately 32,625 feet of local roads for access within the proposed subdivision. The cost of road construction is expected to be less than the main access road at $1,000 per linear foot but will still require blasting and on -site gravel production. Another feature of this design is a 12-acre parcel that can be used for development of a Tsunami Evacuation Area, parking for recreational trails, and potentially as an elementary school site in the future. Ten -foot -wide rights of way are also dedicated throughout the proposed subdivision to allow foot and bicycle traffic to access the 12-acre site without having to traverse completely around the subdivision using bike paths along the roads. These corridors would also create more direct access to other trails that might be developed on the hillside around the subdivision. See attached SMIC Bench Concept. The main barrier to achieving a concept design that financially breaks even or makes a profit is the cost of the road and utility construction. Within any given subdivision design, the lots along a section of the subdivision road that serves those lots must pay for itself at a minimum. The construction will include the road itself, ditches, bike paths, lighting, and underground electric, communication, and gas lines. These features are considered when generating a construction cost for a linear foot of road. This makes the equation simpler when comparing costs of construction to the market value of each lot created. At a minimum, the creation of a group of lots, served by a road corridor that includes all utilities and drainage, would pay for itself when the lots are sold. If the road costs are more than other areas within a given market, the market value of the lots must also increase proportionally, and it becomes a question of what the market will bear regarding the appeal of the lots. The concept design requires two access roads that begin at Nash Road, and extend to the top of the SMIC Bench. Because of the steep slopes between the road and the bench, there can be no lot development until the top is reached. Therefore, there is no offsetting lot sales available to pay for the construction of the 13,600 feet of road construction. The estimated cost of this road construction is $27.410M, which does not include the water and sewer costs. The interior subdivision roads on top of the bench are expected to cost $32.6M, bringing the total roads costs to $60M. Water, sewer, electric, and communication line costs for the entire 674 lot development is expected to be approximately $54M, driving costs upward to above $100M. Table 5. Estimated Concept Development Cost Summary Infrastructure Needed Estimated Cost for Full Included Contingencies Concept Development Road Construction from Nash Rd. to Bench $27.41 million 20% ($5.48 million) Interior Subdivision Roads $32.6 million 20% ($6.52 million) Water, Sewer, Electric, Communication Lines $54 million 25% ($10.78 million) Total Estimated Development Cost $114 million 20% ($22.78 Million) Price per Lot to break even on development $169,155 costs (total costs/674 lots) There are contingencies associated with each construction estimate. For example, the utilities estimate has a 25% contingency that adds $10.78M to the final cost; the utility estimate is based on 750 housing units to account for two or multi -family units on some of the proposed lots and ensure the water and wastewater systems would be right -sized for the potential development. Final construction costs could potentially be lower depending on actual conditions within the site, lowering the breakeven individual lot value. 17 Feasibility Summary The SMIC Bench provides a large, buildable space to expand housing for the City of Seward. The crux of development is constructing access roads up the steep slopes to the bench and bringing utilities to the site. The expectation that the entire site is shallow bedrock also increases the costs of development. Roads and ditches would need to be blasted, and gravel crushed on -site for use as a leveling course. The bedrock also eliminates the option of on -site sewer and water for each lot. Instead, the water must be pumped up the hill, or a community well would need to be established at the top of the bench. In either case, a water storage system would also be required. On -site sewage systems would not be viable, so a treatment system would need to be constructed that would meet the needs of the entire community. Estimated costs for creating these systems is included in Tables 4 and 5. Utility Expansion Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate. The last consideration is the cost to maintain the improvements. Roads must be plowed. Sewage systems must be maintained. Water pumps and storage facilities require maintenance. With a subdivision such as this, it is imperative that the access road be maintained in a usable state. Any disruption caused by landslides, avalanches, earthquakes, or even on -going maintenance, would disrupt the entire community that resides in the subdivision. The SMIC Bench site is one of the only large areas in Seward that can add a meaningful amount of housing inventory for the city. Once the site is accessed, the bench offers over 240 acres of space to develop individual lots, a tsunami evacuation area, a potential school site, and access to millions of acres of public recreational land. The views from the bench would undoubtedly be stunning on a clear day, adding value to the created lots, and making the subdivision one of the more desirable ones in the city. For a subdivision of this size, a phased approach works best to avoid incurring the costs of constructing the entire subdivision prior to selling a single lot. A connection will need to be made between the north and south access roads to provide alternate access for the created lots. This connection would naturally fall along the south and west edges of the subdivision, which feature lots likely to have the greatest appeal and views. The southern and western lots would be expected to have a higher value once access and utilities are provided, and construction costs could be recovered more quickly than lots on the interior. After dual access is constructed, the rest of the subdivision could be developed as needed, and as more funding becomes available. Additional benefits of phasing the development is that the SMIC Bench area becomes available sooner to the community at large for recreational purposes. Once on the bench, multi -use trails can be established and be incorporated into future phased development. Trails built to accommodate a multitude of nonmotorized recreational uses, including cross-country skiing in the winter and mountain biking in the summer, could crisscross the bench resulting in trails with breathtaking mountain views on one side and panoramic views of Resurrection Bay on the other. Local hiking trails might be built to connect with established ridge trails to provide further access to millions of acres of recreational public land and scenic vistas. The Bench Community, if constructed thoughtfully, could satisfy the need for housing while creating miles of recreational opportunities for the citizens of Seward. The SMIC Bench subdivision has been designed to support a potential mix of zoning and housing development types including single family homes, single family with accessory dwelling units, duplexes, and multifamily developments to provide for significant and flexible housing unit expansion. The opportunities offered through the development of SMIC Bench are feasible and could help meet multiple high priority needs of the community and achieve identified goals of the City of Seward. The cities' Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan both encourage development of new housing, and the city and borough code support the proposed concept plan. The citizens of Seward are united in their love for the city 18 and the outdoor space that surrounds it, but also understand that the city needs housing for people that live and work in the city year-round. This subdivision addresses the community's needs and values by creating housing opportunities surrounded by expansive nature, featuring panoramic views, and providing access to recreational opportunities otherwise available to so few. iM \\�\\I \l`\ +tea �,. LIIrza u rzrz. H L- i b rzo 12-PCRE SCHOOL I z TRACTq J z,a zas zs z, za y r sry +wno n•^ � z. e TSUNAhII CENTER SITE L6 _ z z o ,o ego , a s i rz ,o .a +,.an +rcan zr � zrzs zrzz au �� \ zx zw / ze Lacy /'�-�Roeoseo +�,.� rasss reono� 20 N,7TE$ UP& al CONCEPT DESIGN PROPOSED SMIC BENCH SUBDIVISION n°tso�i Su a iso�igs z assm <o' —4 1111osnoirzorz TRACT I � '� ---------- L--=------ H, TRAC- ------------------- i I 00 \ / ORTH ACCESS ROAD \ �- \ 6,062' LONG $12.124M $2K PER FOOT @ So SOUTH ACCESS ROAD 7,643 LONG FROM WATER TANK $15.286M @ $2K PER FOOT / \ 20C / , v b 21 Please note that this Interim Summary of Findings contains a high-level overview of some of Victus Advisors' research, analysis, and recommendations, however our full final report should be read for a complete presentation of findings and detailed understanding of underlying methodologies, findings, assumptions, and estimates. Our work relies on a variety of information and assumptions to develop market, financial, and economic projections. Sources of information and assumptions include, but may not be limited to, information provided by the City of Seward, input and opinions provided by relevant third parties, Octus Advisors' industry experience and previous studies, and publicly available data from various industry sources. Any information collected by Victus Advisors has not been audited or verified and has been assumed to be correct. There will be differences between actual events and the projections contained herein, and we express no assurances of any kind related to any projected information. Differences between projections and actual events may be material 23 DRAFT- Subject to Change 2 1. MARKET RESEARCH -qur INTER/M PRESENTATION 2. CONCEPTUAL, OPERATIONAL & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS M 3. FINAL REPORT & PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS DRAFT- Subject to Change SECONDARY MARKET RESEARCH Regional Inventory Public & Demand Information Session Analysis Local Sports/Rec Program &Facility • • InventoryProgram Recommendations Demographic & Socioeconomic Analysis Ownership & Operations Analysis Operating Pro Forma 24 -4�eL FMMCaRN RESEARCH & ENGAGEMENT Funding Options Analysis Building Project Assessment (Sites, Concept Plan & Cost) Seward (shown at left) is part of the Kenai Borough and has a current estimated population of 2,796. Source: Esd 25 DRAFT- Subject to Change 40 Miles: 5,186 Based upon Victus Advisors' experience, primary attendance for public recreation centers in smaller and rural communities can often be drawn from within a 30-45 minute driving distance. As shown at left, there is a population of just under 5,200 people within a 40-mile driving distance of Seward. Source: Esd 26 DRAFT- Subject to Change LOCAL SPORTS PROGRAMS Program Operator Facilities Used Amenities Used Competitive Volleyball League Seward Parks & Recreation Seward Middle School Court Space Dr. D's Basketball Private Seward Middle/High School, AVTEC Gym Court Space Marathon Volleyball Club Private Ephraim Middle/Elementary School Court Space Marathon Wrestling Club Private Seward Middle/High School Court Space Recreational Volleball League Seward Parks & Recreation Seward Middle School Court Space Tsunami Swim Club Private Seward High School Pool Urbach's Youth Basketball League Seward Parks & Recreation AVTEC Gym Court Space Youth Archery Seward Parks & Recreation Seward Cruise Ship Terminal Open Space Sources.- Victus research, City of Seward Note. Sorted by Program in alphabetical order LOCAL SPORTS FACILITY INVENTORY Basketball Multi -Purpose Facility Owner Operator Court Floor Pool AVTEC Gym Seward Cruise Ship Terminal Seward High School Seward Middle School State of Alaska Alaska Railroad Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Kenai Peninsula Borough School District State of Alaska Alaska Railroad Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Sources.- Victus research, City of Seward Notes.- Sorted by Facilitym alphabetica/order "A VTEC Gym is only available Thursday through Saturday for Seward residents. **The facilityis scheduled to be demolishedand replaced with anew facilitythat may not accommodate other uses. 27 DRAFT- Subject to Change 6 vrogram Competitive Volleyball League Recreational Volleyball League Individual Fee Team Fee $225 $180 Urbach's Youth Basketball $40 - Youth Archery $20 - Source: Seward Parks and Recreation Note: Sorted by Program in alphabetical order 28 DRAFT - Subject to Change As shown to the left, the Seward Parks and Recreation department currently offers four (4) recreational programs for youth and adults. The department currently does not offer senior programming, aquatic programming, and adaptive programming in large part because of a lack of indoor recreational space. According to staff, the department used to offer more indoor recreation programs, but many have been cut over the last three (3) years. Willow Glaci er View a, Alexander 4.O Palmer Creek Knik-Fairview lark 6 Q AQa ve 8 ,0 Chugach Chugach Vald ness Tyonek State Park National Forest Alyeska Tatitlek Whiotier �© <i lark I Park erling Cooper serve �---� Landing Si,a Seward Chenega AnchorP. Kenai Fjords National Park F, r Kachemak Bay State Park Source. Google Maps Notes. (1) Facilities sorted by Driving Distance from Seward (Mi/es) m descending order (2) This list is not intended to be comprehensive, but rather a sample of facilities that have been used or are currently used by various groups and individuals that we interviewed. Driving Distance from Seward Facilities (Mules) 1 Soldotna Regional Sports Complex 95 2 Kenai Recreation Center 104 3 Nikiski Community Recreation Center 116 4 O'Malley Sports Complex 119 5 The Dome 123 6 South Peninsula Athletic & Recreation Center (SPARC) 167 7 Curtis D. Menard Memorial Sports Center 171 Victus Advisors compiled the list above of local indoor sports facilities that have been visited or utilized by interviewees and survey respondents. Many of these facilities have been utilized for both local practices/games and regional tournament activities. 29 DRAFT - Subject to Change 8 Saskethal0 lce Indoor Facility Location Owner/Operator Court Sheet Turf Curtis D. Menard Memorial Sports Center Wasilla City of Wasilla 1 1 The Dome Anchorage Private - - 1 Kenai Recreation Center Kenai City of Kenai 1 - Nikiski Community Recreation Center Nikiski North Peninsula Recreation Service Area 1 - O'Malley Sports Complex Anchorage Private 4 2 Soldotna Regional Sports Complex Soldotna City of Soldotna - 1 South Peninsula Athletic & Recreation Center (SPARC) Homer Private 1 - Sources: VIctus research, facility operators Note: Sorted by Factlityin alphabetical order REGIONAL INDOOR SPORTS FACILITY INVENTORY NOTES As shown above no facility had all three (3) cited amenities. Furthermore, only one (1) of the facilities profiled had more than one (1) basketball court/multi-use floor, ice sheet, or indoor turf field. Lastly, four (4) of the seven (7) profiled facilities are owned and operated by the public sector. 30 DRAFT- Subject to Change In May 2022, the City of Seward identified participants and scheduled a series of in -person, virtual, and telephone interviews for Victus Advisors. The goals of these interviews were to gather feedback from key stakeholders and community leaders regarding the potential for a new community recreation center in Seward. INTERVIEWS - Victus Advisors conducted in -person, virtual and telephone interviews with representatives from the following 20 stakeholder groups (in alphabetical order): • Alaska Vocational Technical Center (AVTEC) • Bloom • Boys & Girls Clubs of the Kenai Peninsula • City of Seward, City Manager's Office • City of Seward, Community Development • City of Seward, Parks & Recreation • City of Seward, Mayor's Office • Happy Youth Programs + Educational Resources • Kenai Fjords National Park • Kenai Peninsula Econ Dev District • Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly • Major Marine Tours • Qutekcak Native Tribe • Seward Boys & Girls Club • Seward Chamber of Commerce • Seward Community Foundation • Seward Community Health Center • Seward Prevention Coalition • Seward Providence Medical Center • Seward Senior Center 31 DRAFT - Subject to Change 10 PERCEPTIONS OF CURRENT INDOOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN SEWARD • All interviewees agreed that there are limited indoor spaces for recreational activities and other events such as banquets and weddings requiring a capacity over 80 people. • Demand for more indoor space has been driven by middle and high school parents asking for more indoor opportunities and activities for youth during the winter months. • Interviewees also indicated that there is no indoor space for elderly residents to get exercise, in particular walking, during the colder months and poor weather. • The following indoor facilities were commonly cited as spaces used by local Seward residences: o 5th Avenue Fitness o Apex Gym (Crossfit) o AVTEC Gym o Seward Cruise Ship Terminal • The AVTEC Gym is only available Thursday through Saturday for Seward residents via the Parks & Recreation department while the Seward Cruise Ship Terminal is occasionally available for some sports activity and other events October through April. The Seward High School pool as been used by local residents and the Tsunami Swim Club, foot outside access is very limited. ?AFT - Subject to Change 11 IDEAL FEATURES AND AMENITIES FOR A NEW COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER • Nearly all interviewees stated that the proposed venue should be multi -use and ensure open access for all residents. • Common amenities requested by most interviewees included: o Indoor walking track o Multi -purpose gym/floor for basketball, volleyball, wrestling, etc. and other events such as banquets and weddings o Multi -purpose rooms that can be used for classes, dance studios, youth programs, etc. SUPPORT FOR A NEW COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER • Generally speaking, interviewees were supportive of a new community recreation center citing the lack of current indoor space and the potential benefits including improved quality of life, providing safe and diverse opportunities and activities for youth, and creating a community gathering place. • While there was support for the need of a community recreation center, there were may questions and concerns about how the proposed venue would be funded and financially operated/sustainable. recreation center. 33 DRAFT - Subject to Change 12 In May 2022, Victus Advisors also conducted phone interviews with local and regional community and sports groups that could potentially use a new community recreation center in Seward. INTERVIEWEES - Victus Advisors conducted telephone interviews with representatives from the following 10 user groups (in alphabetical order): • Alaska Hockey Association • Alaska USA Wrestling • Dr. D's Basketball • Kenai Peninsula Hockey Association • Marathon Volleyball Club • Marathon Wrestling Club • Seward High School Swimming • Seward High School Track & Field • Tsunami Swim Club • USA Hockey Pacific 34 DRAFT - Subject to Change 13 Likelihood Type Ideal User Groups of Usaae of Usaae Amenities Days Times Seasons Bloom (Seward Prevention Coalition) Definitely Use Children's Programming Flex Space Weekdays Mornings, Afternoons Year -Round HYPER (Seward Prevention Coalition) Definitely Use Children's Programming Flex Space Weekdays Mornings, Afternoons Year -Round Qutekcak Native Tribe Definitely Use Adult & Youth Programming Flex Space, Walking Track Weekdays All Day Year -Round Seward Boys & Girls Club Definitely Use Children's & Youth Programming Flex Space Weekdays Afternoons Year -Round Seward Senior Center Definitely Use Senior Programming Flex Space, Walking Track Weekdays Mornings, Afternoons Year -Round Source: VIctus research Notes: Non -Sports User Groups sorted in alphabetical order. This is likely a partial list of potential users, based solely on the interviewees contacted by VIctus Advisors. SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL NON -SPORTS USERS Several community groups that were interviewed expressed interest in using a new community recreation center in Seward. Sports User Groups Likelihood of Usage Type of Usage Ideal # of Courts/Sheets Days Times Number of Annual Events Seasons Alaska Hockey Association Definitely Use Events 1 Weekends All Day 1 Spring Alaska USA Wrestling Possibly Use Events 1 Weekends All Day 1 Spring Dr. D's Basketball Definitely Use Camps, Leagues 2 Weekdays Evenings - Year -Round Kenai Peninsula Hockey Association Definitely Use Events 1 Weekends All Day 1 Spring Marathon Volleyball Club Definitely Use Practices, Games, Events 4 Weekdays, Weekends All Day 2 Winter, Spring Marathon Wrestling Club Definitely Use Practices, Games, Events 2 Weekdays, Weekends All Day 2 Winter, Spring Seward High School Swimming Definitely Use Events - Weekends All Day 1 Spring Seward High School Track & Field Definitely Use Practices Weekdays Evenings - Winter, Spring Tsunami Swim Club Definitely Use Practices, Games, Events - Weekdays, Weekends All Day 2 Winter, Spring USA Hockey Pacific Definitely Use Events 1 Weekends All Day 3 Spring Source: VIctus research Notes: (1) Sports User Groups sorted in alphabetical order. (2) This is likely a partial list of potential users, based solely on the interviewees contacted by VIctus Advisors. (3) Swimming groups interest is based on potential building of an indoor pool as part of recreation center, SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL SPORTS USERS Sports User Groups' usage ranged from weekday use for games and practices to weekend tournament usage. DRAFT- Subject to Change In addition to one-on-one, in -person and telephone interviews in May and June 2022, Victus Advisors also conducted online surveys with 681 respondents. Based on the current estimated population of 5,186 people in the Greater Seward community, questions with 681 responses have a margin of error of +/- 3.5%* with a 95% confidence interval. The survey link was distributed by the City via their email, digital, online, and social media channels. Respondent profile: • 54% reside within City of Seward limits • 46% live outside of City limits ("Greater Seward") • 83% between the ages of 25 and 64 (50% age 25 to 44, 33% age 45 to 64) • 45% live in a household with children under 18 • 83% live in a household where someone has been involved in recreational programs in Seward, whether public (operated by Seward Parks and Recreation) or private programs *Note: For questions later in the survey with 523 �bsoonses, the margin of error is +/- 4. 06% with a 95% confidence interval. DRAFT - Subject to Change 15 Survey respondents were asked to rate their impressions of indoor recreation opportunities on a 7-point scale, in which "T represents "Very Satisfied" and 'T' represents "Very Dissatisfied". Based on these satisfaction ratings, Victus Advisors has assigned a "Top-2 Box Rating to each factor that is presented on the following page. Top-2 Box Rating represents the combined scores of "T and "6" given to each factor by respondents, representing the highest levels of satisfaction. A" 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 Te?r?-? ROY Pnting (% 7 or 6) §0:-Excellent General Top-2 Box score Good standards for satisfaction hM analysis • Average VV • Below Average Our Top-2 Box methodology is a best -in -class approach to satisfaction measurement. 37 DRAFT- Subject to Change 16 Please rate your OVERALL IMPRESSIONS of the indoor recreation opportunities in the City of Seward on a scale of 7 to 1, where 7 = `l T Satisfied'and 1= `l T Dissatisfied"' Comniitmentisupport for indoor recreation from local businesses Quality of indoor meeting, gathering & community evert spaces Quantity of indoor meeting, gathering & mnmunity evert spaces Quality of indoorsports/recreationfacilities - Opportunities for youth to participate in a wide variety of indoor recreation � opportunities Quantity of indoor sperts/recreatien facilities 9% Overall Sat. with indoor recreation opportunities in Seward 9% Opportunities foradultsto participate in a WdevariiAy of irKkmx recreation % opportunities Opportunities for senior citizens to participate in indoor recreation programs and 9% act vibes Cornrrfitment/support for indoor recreation from government estifies 9% 28% 26% 23% 24% 25% 24% 25% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ■ Top-2 Box 5,4 ■ Battorrr3 Box Notes. (1) Sorted by Top-2 Box score in descending order (2) Base. 582 respondents Overall ratings of the indoor recreation opportunities in Seward were very negative, with all factors receiving Bottom-3 Box scores of at least 40%. IDRAFT- Subject to Change 17 ■ `How often do you typically travel outside of the City of Seward to part/2/pate in indoor recreational activities?' 60% 52% 50%® 40% 30%® 20% 1 7%® 10%® 0% Rarely or Monthly Never 14%® 3%® 3%® 1 0 ■ 1 %® Quarterly Once per Weekly Daily Year Notes: (1) Sorted by frequency score in descending order (2) Base: 559 respondents 48% of respondents indicated that they travel outside of Seward for indoor recreational activities. 17% indicated they travel at least once a month. 39 DRAFT- Subject to Change "When you do travel outside of the City of Seward to participate in indoor recreational activities, which indoor recreation facility do you visit most often?' 1 S% 17% 16% 14% ■ 12% 12% M11% U101 10% 7% 6% The Dome Nikiski O'Malley Sports Soldotna Menard Kenai (Anchorage) Community Complex Regional Sports Memorial Recreation Recreation (Anchorage) Complex Sports Center Center (Kenai) Center (Nikiski) (Soldotna) (wasilla) Notes: (1) Sorted by Facilities score in descending order (2) Facilities shown above were selected by more than 5% of respondents (3) Base: 314 respondents The facilities most frequented outside of Seward were fairly fragmented, with no facility receiving more than 17% of the responses. 40 DRAFT- Subject to Change "What are the primary indoor amenities that you (or your farm/y) utilize most frequently at recreation centers outside of Seward?" Ice rink (includes recreational skating, figure skating, ice hockey, etc.) Indoor leisure pool (for families with children) Youth sports programs 7% Indoor running/walking track 7% Rock climbing wall 7% Adult fitness programs and classes 7% Indoor lap pool (for swim teams, personal 6% fitness/training, etc.) Sauna or steam room 6% Meeting/event rooms (e.g. rentals for private events) 5% Adult sports programs 5% Youth after school programs and summer camps 5% D 9% ®% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% Notes: (1) Sorted byAmenities score in descending order (2) Amenities shown above were selected by a minimum of 5% of respondents (3) Base: 472 respondents Like the previous question, the amenities/uses that Seward residents travel outside the City for were also very fragmented, with no amenity/use receiving more than 9% of the responses. 41 DRAFT- Subject to Change `Please select up to two 0 established amateur indoor sports that you think the Seward sports community has developed most successfully in terms of organized opportunities to learn and play." Basketball Swimming & Diving VoHeyball Wrestling 9% 24% 27% 26% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Notes: (1) Sorted by Sports score in descending order (2) Sports shown above were selected by minimum of5% of respondents (3) Base: 509 respondents Basketball, Swimming, and Volleyball were identified as the three most established indoor sports in Seward. 42 DRAFT- Subject to Change 'Please select up to two (2) emerging or underserved amateur indoor sports that you think have the most potential to be successful in Seward with the addition of a new indoor recreation facility. " Bowling Ice Hockey Indoor Track Indoor Soccer 8% Swimming & Diving 7% Dance M 6% Gymnastics 5% Bickleball 5% Basketball 5% 11% 13% im. ®% 5% 16% 15% 20% Notes: (1) Sorted by Sports score in descending order (2) Sports shown above were selected by minimum of 5% of respondents (3) Base: 523 respondents Bowling, Ice Hockey, and Indoor Track were identified as the three sports in Seward with the most emerging potential. 43 DRAFT- Subject to Change "General/y speaking, do you support the idea of the City of Seward building a new public indoor community recreation center for primary use by Seward area residents and fami/ies?" Not Sure, 111% No, 10% Base: 523 respondents Prior to any discussion of potential construction costs or funding sources, 79% of respondents support the idea of the City of Seward building a new indoor community recreation center. 44 DRAFT- Subject to Change "If a new ,nub/ic indoor community recreation center were built in Seward, how would you rank your (or your family's) interest in using the followin_a ,potential amenities?" Rank Amenity 1 Indoor running/walking track 2 Youth sports programs 3 Gym (courts for basketball, volleyball, etc.) 4 Indoor field (for soccer, flag football, running/training, etc.) 5 Ice rink (for recreational skating, figure skating, ice hockey, etc.) 6 Adult fitness programs and classes 7 Indoor leisure pool (for families with children) 8 Adult education programs and classes 9 Adult sports programs 10 Rock climbing wall 11 Indoor lap pool (for swim teams, personal fitness/training, etc.) 12 Meeting/event rooms (e.g. rentals for private events) 13 Cardio equipment 14 Sauna or steam room 15 Senior programs 16 Youth after school programs and summer camps 17 Strength equipment (Nautilus, Cybex, etc.) 18 Weight room (free weights) 19 Racquetball 20 Pickleball Base: 523 respondents Indoor running/walking track, Youth sports programs, and Gym space were the three highest ranked priorities for desired amenities at a new indoor community recreation center. 45 DRAFT - Subject to Change \1 \ v I C T U A D V I S 0 R S S INITIAL BUILDING PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS Our building program recommendations are based primarily upon Victus' research and engagement results presented in the previous pages. We have identified that community demand exists for a community indoor recreational facility in Seward. Please note: a) We have presented levels of priority, assuming that the project may need to be phased based upon available funding (to be explored in the next stage of our study); and, b) We have prioritized amenities/uses that are multi -use and/or appeal to the largest number of users. Priori I • Gymnasium (two basketball courts convertible to four volleyball; multi -use for wrestling, pickleball, larger flat -floor events, banquets, weddings, gatherings for 80+ people, etc.) • Indoor Walking/Jogging Track • Multi -use programming space (youth programs, adult programs, meeting space, etc.) • Other potential amenities: Bathroom/changing rooms ("express lockers"), childcare for facility users, concessions stand or vending machine area, office/administrative and storage space for Seward Parks & Recreation, and on -site parking to meet peak demand. Priori II • Indoor artificial turf field Priority III • Ice sheet • Pool DRAFT - Subject to Change KEY TAKEAWAYS Priorities / & // are relatively more affordable to build and operate on a SF basis than Priority /// amenities. /n addition, Priorities / & // would be expected to maximize utilization per SF relative to 47 Priority /// features. Mav June July Aua PROJECT TASK: WEEK ENDING. B 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 TBD Kickoff Meeting, Site Tours & Stakeholder/User Interviews (2 days) Demographic & Socioeconomic Analysis Local Sports/Recreation Program & Facility Inventory Community Recreation Survey DRAFT DISTRIBUTE ANALYZE Regional Inventory & Demand Analysis (includes Event Interviews) Building Program Recommendations Interim Presentation - Initial Research Findings & Facility Recs. Ownership & Operations Analysis Operating Pro Forma Funding Options Analysis Building Project Assessment Submit Draft Report Final Presentations in Seward (TBD) Note: cat; EE.3V boxes identify on -site visits by Victus Advisors and EAPC to Seward L* 48 DRAFT- Subject to Change 27 ➢ The 330-ton Travelift has started to pick up; vessels are starting to come out for winter. ➢ We are training new harborworkers on the maintaining the Travelifts. ➢ We are working on the SMIC yard drainage to keep water flowing into the ditches. ➢ The water is on at all locations in the harbor. ➢ We have opened G, K and L-float still waiting on the pedestals, no water is available but we did set up a location between K and J float for the vessels to clean or get fresh water. STILL WAITING ON THE PEDESTALS. ➢ We are still working with the public with COVID protocol in mind while continuing to do boat lifts and public contact in the Seward Harbor office. ➢ A continuous cleanup is still in process on the last lot at SMIC, this cleanup is starting to take shape, just a few more items to deal with and we can lease out the property again. ➢ The harbor office is currently open seven days a week. ➢ The North East harbor launch ramp water line is complete just a few punch list items for the contractor to work on. ➢ We have applied for a federal grant from the PIDP for the washdown pad. (STILL WAITING) ➢ We are continuing to work with Moffatt & Nicole on the design for the 5-ton crane on I - Dock, Corp Permit has been approved ➢ We have completed the 2022 Salmon Derby we had four vessels sink in 5 days to start the derby off. ➢ I would like to thank Storm Chasers who were on scene very quickly to raise the vessels before any release of fuel. E,M CALL TO ORDER The May 4, 2022 regular meeting of the Port and Commerce Advisory Board was called to order at 12:00 p.m. by Chair Brandii O'Reagan. OPENING CEREMONY Chair Brandii O'Reagan led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL There were present: Brandii O'Reagan, presiding; and Lynda Paquette Bruce Jaffa Colby Lawrence (arrived at 12:30 p.m.) r^r' Benjamin Smith Fred Weel er-s comprising a quorum of the Board; and Stephen Sowell, Assistant City Manager Norm Regis, Harbormaster Kris Peck, Deputy City Clerk Excused — Woelkers Absent — Hughes CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING — None APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Motion (Jaffa/Paquette) Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda Motion Passed Unanimous The clerk read the following approved consent agenda items: Approval of the April 6, 2022 PACAB Regular Meeting Minutes. Approval of the April 20, 2022 PACAB Special Meeting Minutes. SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS Proclamations & Awards — None 50 Administration Report. Assistant City Manager Stephen Sowell reported that last night the Planning & Zoning Comission considered two resolutions regarding the proposed Hemlock Subdivision and both were failed. Paquette asked about the possibility of the Kenai Peninsula Borough opening up land for local development. Sowell responded that he had talked with borough representatives and planned to walk some property outside of city limits. Paquette wondered if there was a way to ensure the opened land wouldn't go straight to vacation rentals. Sowell responded there could be provisions in the contract of a purchase agreement. Smith asked about the status of vacant city lots that hadn't yet been considered yet for housing. Sowell responded that administration was waiting to see what residents wanted in terms of building an ice rink or a community recreation center. Jaffa recalled land sales with the borough had been problematic, because the borough couldn't limit anyone to a specific zoning use. He cautioned that if too much land was opened at once, it might create a frenzy and careful planning would go by the wayside. Sowell said the city was advocating for the borough and private enterprises to step up and meet the housing needs of the Seward area. However, he noted there was always going to be more people who wanted to live in Seward that were actually able to. Paquette wondered if the city could encourage private entities to help solve the housing crisis. Major players like the Sealife Center, school system, and the hospital could potentially pool their resources to create employee housing. Many other private enterprises had successfuly built housing for their employees. Harbormaster Report. Harbormaster Norm Regis reported the waitlist for the travelist was at least a week. The harbor crew had been shortstaffed due to Matt Chase's retirement and Tony Sieminski learning his new role as Deputy Harbormaster. The remaining concrete blocks for the Northeast boat launch ramps should be arriving soon. Jaffa asked about the life expectancy of the new launch ramp.Regis responded there was a 50-year life span for the new launch ramp. PACAB Chair report. Brandii O'Reagan announced PACAB had received two more letters of interest for the heat loop funding Ad -Hoc Committee. She appointed both Mary Tougas and Mike Brown to the committee. Other Reports and Announcements Alaska Railroad Report. Port Operations Manager Christy Terry estimated around 175,000 total cruise ship passengers would be in Seward this summer. These figures were similar to the passenger numbers from 2016. This year would mark the absence of Holland America ships in Seward, as they had relocated their operations to Whittier. In regard to Covid-19 protocols, A Terry stated every crew member or passenger able to get vaccinated would be required to get vaccinated. Paquette asked what the plan was if a passenger tested positive for Covid-19. Terry responded the passenger would instantly be put on a shuttle and transported straight to Anchorage. Terry continued that Viking cruiselines had a new business model which included a two night stay in Seward to encourage shore excursions. Studies indicated that the cruising demographic was getting younger, and the passengers were becoming more independent. Lawrence arrived at the meeting at 12: 3Op. m. Chamber of Commerce Report. Executive Director Kat Sorenson reported that over the past five years visitor trends in Seward had shifted from a two day stay to four and a half day visit. As the summer season was gearing up, the chamber staff had been doing familiarization trips with locals excursions and businesses. Sorenson addressed the long wait times at restaurants last summer and said there was more preparation this year. More dining options such as food trucks and mobile vendors would also help meet the increased demand. Sorenson emphasized how we don't want visitors to depart Seward with bad memories of two hours wait times for food. During the winter months, Sorenson hoped the locals would be understanding of the lack of variety. Restaurants would not stay open in the winter simply as a favor, if the business model did not support it. Presentations Update on the project to clear trees from the electric lines and status of net metering by Electric Director Rob Montgomery. O'Reagan left the meeting at 12: 55 p.m. Smith wondered what caused the recent Saturday night power outage. Mongomery responded that a small tree near Bear Creek fell onto the power lines and tripped the breaker. Paquette asked if widening the road in Moose Pass would make it easier to maintain the lines. Montgomery responded the Electric Department already had their own access points. In some cases, the new construction actually exposed new trees that could be problematic to the power lines. Jaffa brought up how GCI had a history of outages in that same Moose Pass area. He wondered if the city shared the right of -way with GCI. Montgomery responded that sometimes GCI and AT&T attached their equipment to city poles for a fee. NEW BUSINESS Resolutions- None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS PACAB's 2022 Priorities & Goals. 6% Jaffa felt PACAB had done all they could in regard to the housing crisis and it should no longer be a hot topic with this board. CITIZEN COMMENTS — None BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION COMMENTS & RESPONSE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS Sowell thanked PACAB for their work this past year. He wished everyone a busy and successful summer. Regis thanked Montgomery for his presentation. He encouraged PACAB members to call the harbormaster's office with any questions over the summer. Jaffa thanked the board for their helpful discussions. He enjoyed his daily commute into Seward and was glad to travel from one beautiful environment to another. Smith thanked Montgomery for the utility presentation and thanked the city staff who made these PACAB meetings possible. Lawrence observed there was only one more PACAB work session and then the summer craziness would begin. Paquette thanked Montgomrey for his presentation. She appreciated the two new members who joined the heat loop funding Ad Hoc Committee. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 1:20 p.m. Kris Peck Deputy City Clerk (City Seal) Brandii O'Reagan Chair 53 City of Seward, Alaska Port and Commerce Advisory Board Special Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Volume 4, Page CALL TO ORDER The June 8, 2022 special meeting of the Port and Commerce Advisory Board was called to order at 12:00 p.m. by Chair Brandii O'Reagan. OPENING CEREMONY The board led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL There were present: Brandii O'Reagan, presiding; and Lynda Paquette Colby Lawrence Benjamin Smith comprising a quorum of the Board; and Stephen Sowell, Assistant City Manager Brenda Ballou, City Clerk Excused — None Absent — None Bruce Jaffa Carl Hughes Fred Woelkers CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING Deborah Altermatt thought PACAB was doing a great job. She said there was a Seward resident named Sue Canta who had gifted the city with $100,000 upon her passing in 2010 with the request that the funds be put towards beautifying Seward; specifically, Canta wished for the city to install a year-round public toilet facility at Wellington Park. Altermatt believed the heat loop project would dovetail well with Canta's endowment to provide energy efficiencies. Unfortunately, Altermatt said, in 2021 the city put the funds towards temporary portable toilet facilities; she didn't know where they had been set up, but hadn't seen any at Wellington Park. Darryl Schaefermeyer supported Resolution 2022-006, and thought it was very important to keep Your Clean Energy available as a technical resource. Bob Linville also supported Resolution 2022-006. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Motion (Paquette/Hughes) Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda 54 City of Seward, Alaska Port and Commerce Advisory Board Special Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Volume 4, Page Motion Passed Unanimous There were no consent agenda items. NEW BUSINESS Resolutions Resolution 2022-006, Requesting Authorization From The City Council To Direct The Manager To Issue A Purchase Order To Your Clean Energy To Consult With The Heat Loop Ad Hoc Committee And Provide Services As Authorized By The Manager And As Requested By The Ad Hoc Committee In Its Effort To Identify Available Funding Sources To Continue The Ground Source/Seward District Heat System Project To Completion. Motion (Jaffa/Lawrence) Approve Resolution 2022-006 O'Reagan stated that there were some amendments that had been requested and she wished to start with those. Motion to Amend (Jaffa/Paquette) Amend Resolution 2022-006 in the title as follows (strikethroughs are deletions and underlines are additions): Rig Author-ization From Recommending The City Council To Direct The City Manager To issue " Pur-ehase Or- T ^ Enter Into A Professional Services Agreement With Your Clean Energy To Consult With The Heat Loop Ad Hoc Committee And Provide Services As Authorized By The City Manager A4W As Requested By The Ad Hoc Committee !n its Effort To Eomple In An Amount Not To Exceed $19,520, And Appropriating Funds. Jaffa said this amendment would clean up the language. Paquette wanted to clarify that the purpose of contracting with Your Clean Energy was to have his support and assistance in seeking funding opportunities. Motion to Amend Passed Unanimous O'Reagan said she strongly supported grass roots efforts that lightened the burden on elected officials and the city, and she was extremely impressed with the committee taking on this 611 City of Seward, Alaska Port and Commerce Advisory Board Special Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Volume 4, Page challenge. She added that she did not support this resolution because she believed the board's charge to the committee in PACAB Resolution 2022-004 was not in keeping with what was proposed in the resolution before them right now. She said the committee was formed to find funding sources, and that was not the purpose of the resolution before them; she believed the process of engaging Your Clean Energy as a resource should come after a potential funding opportunity was identified by the committee, and after the committee brought the opportunity to the attention of PACAB and, subsequently, city council. Once council gave approval to pursue the funding opportunity, then it would make sense to engage Your Clean Energy to assist as a technical resource in completing a grant application. Paquette said her understanding was that Your Clean Energy had information about potential funding sources that were available, and if this contract was approved, YCE could help the city obtain funding. O'Reagan said there was nothing in front of PACAB right now that spoke to YCE helping the committee to find funding; what was written and in front of PACAB was that YCE would help apply for grants. Jaffa was the chair of the committee, and said the committee unanimously believed that YCE would provide significant contributions to accomplishing the mission of the committee. He believed the intent of the resolution before them was to have an expert available as a resource. He said there will come a time when the committee's work will require counsel from YCE to be successful. Jaffa said the city already had access to grant writing resources, but it was important to have access to YCE for technical support and input. Smith thought this resolution was not necessarily a contract for $19,520 worth of services as much as it was an hourly estimate. Hughes believed YCE was instrumental in obtaining and creating the heat loop system at the Alaska SeaLife Center, and thought engaging him in this capacity would be to the benefit of this project. O'Reagan wholeheartedly agreed with the assertions that YCE was an expert in the field of heat loop systems, but reiterated that the committee's charge was to identify funding sources. This resolution specifically says the committee was requesting funding for the purpose of applying for grants, which was not something the committee had been tasked to do. She felt strongly that is the board approved this resolution, then PACAB would be approving something that was outside the scope of the original resolution that defined the mission of the committee. Paquette wondered if the city administration was supportive of this resolution. In response, Assistant City Manager Stephen Sowell said he thought the process would be that the committee would identify a potential funding source, would bring that information to PACAB and city administration, PACAB would bring it to city council, and then administration would engage the grant writers on contract with the city to pursue the application, and would at that time engage YCE for technical information. Sowell said, in order to pursue a grant, both a subject matter expert, as well as a technical resource, were required. He wondered, based on this resolution, who would 67. City of Seward, Alaska Port and Commerce Advisory Board Special Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Volume 4, Page be responsible for writing a grant application. Sowell said he was supportive of this concept, but wanted to make sure YCE had a clear understanding of the role they would play. Paquette wondered what the committee's expectation was for who would be writing grant applications. In response O'Reagan said her understanding was that, once potential funding opportunities were identified, the city manager and city council would be utilizing whatever resources they saw fit to pursue the opportunity, including the possibility of engaging YCE as a technical resource. O'Reagan said the committee's deliverable was to provide potential funding opportunities, either as a list or as they found them, and it would be up to city council to determine the best way to respond. Motion to Amend (O'Reagan/Paquette) Motion to Amend Passed Main Motion Passed Amend Resolution 2022-006 by adding a new Section 3 that reads, "Funding in the amount of $19,520 is hereby appropriated from General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance account no. 01000-0000-3400 to Finance Department Contracted Services account no. 01000-1140-7009 within the 2022 operating budget." and moving all other sections down. Unanimous Yes: Jaffa, Paquette, Smith, Woelkers, Lawrence, Hughes No: O'Reagan INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS — None CITIZEN COMMENTS Bob Linville thanked PACAB for approving the resolution. Darryl Schaefermeyer appreciated the support and the discussion today. Regarding the restroom concern, he believed the heat loop project could provide an opportunity to have a heated public restroom and shower facility. Casie Warner appreciated the resolution being approved, and looked forward to the future outcome. BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION COMMENTS & RESPONSE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS Smith thought this resolution would help move the project forward, and he appreciated hearing about the restroom concern. 57 City of Seward, Alaska Port and Commerce Advisory Board Special Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Volume 4, Page Hughes was pleased to move this project forward. He knew Sue Canta, and wished that her gift would be honored. Paquette was glad the resolution passed, and said Andy Baker from Your Clean Energy had told her he could not help without being paid. She announced she had been selected to attend an Ocean Scientific Drilling Workshop next week in Washington, DC. Jaffa thanked everyone for attending the meeting today, and said he appreciated all the comments and concerns that were expressed. He said the committee met every two weeks, and had been diligently searching for grant opportunities and had been working on community outreach. Lawrence was happy to see this project move forward. Woelkers said he would be open to the possibility of expanding the scope of the committee. O'Reagan appreciated learning about the restroom gift, and said she was glad to see citizens being involved. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 12:55 p.m. Brenda Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) Brandii O'Reagan Chair 58 MEMORANDUM Date: September 7, 2022 To: Port & Commerce Advisory Board From: Brenda Ballou, City Clerk RE: Election of PACAB Chair & Vice Chair Electing a Chair is a multi -step process: • Nominations are taken from the floor • If there is more than one nominee, ballots are cast • When there is a majority of ballots cast for a single candidate, a motion and second can be made to take formal action The term of the Chair will expire at the end of July, 2023. In accordance with Seward City Code 2.10.40, 2.30.210, and Seward Charter 3.5, an applicant must receive at least four of the votes to be appointed. SCC 2.30.210 states the council [and, therefore, PACAB] appoints by ballot voting if there is more than one applicant for the position. For the position of Vice Chair, repeat the process. 59 City of Seward Action Memorandum 2022-001 Subject: Provide City Council Direction to Administration Concerning the Port and Commerce Advisory Board Resolution 2022-006: Recommending the City Council Direct the City Manager to Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Your Clean Energy to Consult with the Heat Loop Ad Hoc Committee and Provide Services as Authorized by the City Manager as Requested by the Ad Hoc Committee in an Amount not to Exceed $19,520, and Appropriating Funds Agenda Date: June 27, 2022 Council Action: 0✓ Approved 0 Amended: 0 Defeated Background and justification: On November 26, 2018, the City of Seward received a $725,000 grant from the Alaska Energy Authority's Renewable Energy Fund to build the Ground Source/Seward District Heat System demonstration project via Resolution 2018-089. PACAB approved Resolution 2022-004 on February 16, 2022, to request that City Council direct PACAB to create a committee to research funding opportunities for this project. March 29, 2022, City Council approved Resolution 2022-038, authorizing PACAB to create and lead an Ad Hoc Committee of interested community members to identify available funding sources to continue the ground source/Seward District Heat System project to completion. On June 2, 2022, the Ad Hoc Committee voted unanimously to bring this recommendation forward to PACAB for consideration. During a special meeting on June 8, the Port and Commerce Advisory Board passed Resolution 2022-006, recommending that City Council direct the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Your Clean Energy to assist with the identification of grant sources and provide grant writing services for the Heat Loop Project. Action Memorandum 2022-001 requests city council direction. Comprehensive and Strategic Plan Consistency Information This legislation is consistent with (citation listed): Comprehensive Plan: 3.1.1.2 continue to support efforts to develop alternate energy sources Strategic Plan: Other: Certification of Funds Total amount of funds listed in this legislation: $ 0 — a future resolution would expend $19,520 This legislation (✓): Creates revenue in the amount of: $ Creates expenditure in amount of: $ Creates a savings in the amount of: $ X Has no fiscal impact Funds are (✓): Budgeted Line item(s): Not budgeted X Not applicable Unassigned Fund Balance and Available Unrestricted Cash Balance Information Fund (✓): General SMIC Boat Harbor Parking Motor Pool Other Unassigned Fund Balance*: Available Unrestricted Cash Balance* Attorney Review,/ RYes Not applicable NElectric Wastewater Water Healthcare *unaudited numbers Finance Director Signature: Administration Recommendation x Provide City Administration Direction Other: Sponsored by: Board Member Jaffa CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA PORT AND COMMERCE ADVISORY BOARD RESOLUTION 2022-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE PORT AND COMMERCE ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH YOUR CLEAN ENERGY TO CONSULT WITH THE HEAT LOOP AD HOC COMMITTEE AND PROVIDE SERVICES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MANAGER AS REQUESTED BY THE AD HOC COMMITTEE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $19,520, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the City of Seward received a $725,000 grant from the Alaska Energy Authority's Renewable Energy Fund to build the Ground Source/Seward District Heat System demonstration project via Resolution 2018-089; and WHEREAS, this project was designed to provide primary heat for the City Library/Museum and City Hall Annex, with options to include the City Hall and Fire Station; and WHEREAS, the project is fully shovel ready for construction; and WHEREAS, the benefits to the community are broad and include long-term economic and environmental benefits; and WHEREAS, the project has substantial merit, beyond a return on investment, by showing the feasibility and benefits of using geothermal heat generated from Resurrection Bay; and WHEREAS, the project has stalled due to dramatic increases in the cost estimates; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022, PACAB approved Resolution 2022-004 to request that City Council direct PACAB to create a committee to research funding opportunities for this project; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022, City Council approved Resolution 2022-038, authorizing PACAB to create and lead an Ad Hoc Committee of interested community members to identify available funding sources to continue the ground source/Seward District Heat System project to completion; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Committee was directed to bring their recommendations back to PACAB for consideration; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Committee will meet with city administration to learn about the grant writing resources available to the city through R&M Consultants which was approved by 62 council Resolution 2021-119; and WHEREAS, should the Ad Hoc Committee discover a potential opportunity to apply for grant funding through R&M Consultants, or by other means, the Ad Hoc Committee wishes to have ready access to Your Clean Energy (YCE) for technical support, information, and services in support; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Committee may continue to request input and engagement from YCE on a voluntary basis, but the Ad Hoc Committee is not authorized to commit or expend funds, per council Resolution 2022-038; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Committee may request the paid services of YCE on a billable hourly basis, based on the contract proposal attached to this resolution, only by submitting their request to the city manager to include a specific request and time estimate; any expenditures incurred by YCE must be approved by, and will be paid in response to, a request from the city manager; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2022, the Ad Hoc Committee voted unanimously to bring this recommendation forward to PACAB for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PORT AND COMMERCE ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that: Section 1. The Port & Commerce Advisory Board (PACAB) hereby accepts the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee. Section 2. PACAB will present this resolution and the contract proposal attached to City Council for consideration. Section 3. Funding in the amount of $19,520 is hereby appropriated from General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance account no. 01000-0000-3400 to Finance Department Contracted Services account no. 01000-1140-7009 within the 2022 operating budget. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Port and Commerce Advisory Board of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 8th day of June, 2022. 63 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ATTEST: THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Brandii O'Reagan, Chair Jaffa, Paquette, Smith, Woelkers, Lawrence, Hughes O'Reagan None None Brenda J. Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) 64 Your Clean Energy Celebrate the power of nature Page 1 of 2 May 11, 2022 Janette Bower, City Manager City Of Seward PO Box 167 Seward, AK 99664 RE: Proposal For Support Services — District Heat Loop Project Dear Janette: This proposal is for anticipated time effort by Andy Baker PE of YCE (You rCleanEnergy) to support additional grant opportunities and development of the City's District Heat Loop Project. This proposal is based on the following: BACKGROUND A team effort by the City and YCE to develop the current Heat Loop Project began with YCE completing a preliminary concept design and Economic Evaluation in 2015. YCE then provided technical assistance to develop a scope of work for construction of a 300 ft deep test well in the waterfront park near the Branson Pavilion. This test well was drilled and a 4" perforated PVC well screen was installed to depth in August of 2015. YCE assisted to identify the Castaway submersible probe that then City Building Inspector Stefan Nilsson used to make a series of measurements to profile the temperature and salinity of the water column down this test well. YCE updated the Economic Evaluation to include the test well measurements and the potential of the heat resource below grade in the waterfront park along the bike path. YCE presented the project to City Council and Admin in September 2015 and Council voted unanimously to pursue a $725,000 grant from the AEA Renewable Energy Fund. YCE provided assistance to complete the descriptive, economic, and technical elements of the AEA grant application; the application successfully competed along with 52 other renewable heat projects across the state of Alaska, and the grant award of $725,000 was made to the City with support in late 2018 from then Governor Bill Walker. The City in 2019 secured the services of YCE for Engineering Design of the project and to update the Economic Evaluation to reflect the final design. Both the final Engineering Design and Economic Evaluation were completed by YCE in August of 2020. SCOPE OF WORK - YCE ongoing time efforts may consist of the following: meetings with and/or presentations for PACAB, the PACAB Heat Loop Project Committee, City Admin and/or City Council; meetings with private, state or federal grant agencies regarding the project; providing historical and new information regarding the project and potential grant opportunities; general correspondence with City Admin, Council, Mayor, PACAB and/or PACAB Heat Loop Committee regarding the Project; and providing assistance to the City with technical and economic information needed for grant applications the City is making for the Project. 3604 S. Charlestown Street, Seattle WA 98144 907-274-2007 www.yourcleanenergy.us M-1 Your Clean Energy Celebrate the power of nature Page 2 of 2 ASSUMPTIONS — Andy Baker of YCE will be available via teleconference or zoom for meetings and presentations with PACAB, City Admin and City Council, but will not travel to Seward unless time and expenses for a trip are fully covered by the City. DELIVERABLES — Following any meetings with City Admin, City Council or PACAB, meeting minutes will be compiled and then distributed to attendees as a record of what was discussed. Following any presentations to City Admin, City Council or PACAB, a PDF and power point show of the slide presentation will be distributed by email by YCE to attendees. Review comments, suggestions, or contributions to grant applications will be sent in PDF form to City Admin and PACAB. These efforts allow progress to be documented with transparency thru the process of developing funding for the project. SCHEDULE —Support services are available to the City from YCE as needed thru December 31, 2022. An extension of YCE support services is available once projected budget herein is reached, or if a time extension into 2023 is requested by City Admin. COMPENSATION — The 2022 billing rate for Andy Baker, PE of YCE for grant and project support is $160/hour. An invoice for each completed effort of the work will be submitted when the tasks and deliverables for that effort is completed. An estimate of YCE support time that may be needed thru December 31, 2022 is as follows, actual time effort may be more or less than this estimate: Prepare for and attend meetings w/ Admin, Council, PACAB (24 hours) $ 3,840 Provide historical and new information regarding the project (24 hours) $ 3,840 General correspondence with Admin or PACAB on the project (24 hours) $ 3,840 Technical assistance with completion of grant applications (50 hours) $ 8,000 Total Compensation $ 19,520 If you have any questions regarding the above scope for support services, or our understanding of the services that may be needed, please feel free to contact me, Sincerely, Andy Baker, PE Owner, Project Manager YourCleanEnergy LLC 3604 S. Charlestown Street, Seattle WA 98144 907-274-2007 www.yourcleanenergy.us [:11 TASKORDER NO.22.02: Seward Heat Loop EERE Community Geothermal Grant Completion This task order is subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement for On -Call Engineering Services between R&M Consultants, Inc. (Engineer) and City of Seward (Owner) dated April 15, 2019 and any amendments thereto. This task order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this task order shall supplement the Agreement as it pertains to the task described below. 1. Task Order Name: Seward Heat Loop EERE Community Geothermal Grant Completion 2. Description of Services to be Performed by Planners: Assist the City of Seward and Heat Loop Project Committee in completing an application for the Community Geothermal Heating and Cooling Design and Deployment Program, administered by the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Specific activities include: a) Project management b) Coordinating, compiling, and/or drafting application materials c) Revisions, edits, finalizing, and compiling application materials 3. Deliverables and Schedule: Deliverables: a. Project check -ins (6-8) b. Project schedule c. Deliverables & responsibilities matrix d. Draft and final Project Narrative (up to 15 pgs.) e. Draft and final Statement of Objectives (up to to pgs.) f. Draft and final Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Plan (up to to pgs.) g. Standard Form-424 h. Budget justification worksheet i. Summary/abstract for public release (1 pg.) j. Summary PowerPoint slide (1 pg.) k. Standard Form-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities I. Current & Pending Support statement m. Compiled, completed application files (.zip) M-A Schedule: All deliverables will be completed before the October 11, 2022 grant deadline. Notes: - YourCleanEnergy, LLC and NREL staff will be primarily responsible for contributing technical content and associated draft narrative language to be used in application materials. - City of Seward staff will submit application materials online. - Exhibit B is an excerpt from the Funding Opportunity Announcement detailing the full application content requirements. 4. Payments to R&M: Owner shall pay R&M Planners on a T&M basis in accordance with the contract rate schedule. Total Not -To -Exceed budget is $ii,iog and will not be expended without prior written approval and task order amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Task Order as of the Effective Date first above written under the hands of their duly authorized representatives. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC Len Story, CEO (Signature) (Date) City of Seward Janette Bower, City Manager (Signature) (Date) 68 EXHIBIT A T026_Seward Heat Loop EERE Community Geothermal Grant Completion_Fee Estimate R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 212 F Vanguard trt 4150.Aa �b°nks KK99 01:907.452 5 70 FIRM: R&M PROJECT TITLE: DATE: T026: Seward Heat Loop EERE Community Geothermal Grant Client: City of Seward Completion 8/17/2022 Task Task Description Labor Expenses & Subs Task Subtotal 1 Community Geothermal Grant Completion $11,109 $ - $ 11,109 Totals: $11,109 $ - $ 11,109 70 COST ESTIMATE PER TASK FIRM: R&M Consultants, Inc. PROJECT TITLE: T026: Seward Heat Loop EERE Community Geothermal Grant Completion TASK NO: 1 TASK DESCRIPTION: Community Geothermal Grant Completion DATE: 8/17/2022 SUB- TASK NO. SUB -TASK DESCRIPTION LABOR HOURS PER JOB CLASSIFICATION Grant Writer Coleman Project Management a Project Check -ins & preparation (6-8) 12 b Building & monitoring schedule of deliverables 3 c Task and deliverables coordination/compilation 10 d Deliverables & responsibilities matrix (completed under TO#22) 0 Application Development e Draft Project Narrative (up to 15 logs., partial completion under TO #22) 20 f Draft Statement of Objectives (up to 10 pgs.) 10 g Draft Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Plan (up to 10 pgs.) 15 h SF-424, budget justification workbook, summary/abstract for public release (1 pg.), summary slide (1 pg.), SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, Current and Pending Support statement) 10 i Revisions, edits, finalizing & compiling application materials 12 TOTAL LABOR HOURS 92 LABOR RATES ($/HR) $120.75 LABOR COSTS ($) $11,109 COMMENTS: 1. Estimate based on 2022 rates. 2. Estimate based on Time and Expenses. 3. This estimate assumes technical content contributions by yourCleanEnergy, LLC and NREL. The Ad -Hoc committee will source team member resumes and letters of committment. 4. City of Seward to submit application materials via EERIE account. SUB -TASK ITEMS) QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FIRM'S LABOR: $11,109 TOTAL EXPENSES: $0 FIRM'S TOTAL EXPENSES Plus 5% Mark -Up: $0 SUB -CONTRACTORS: Firm Initials and Price Per Task TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR Plus 10% Mark -Up: $0 FIRM: TOTAL SUB AMOUNT: $0 TOTAL: $11,109 EXHIBIT B Full Application Content Requirements VA C. Content and Form of the Full Application Applicants must submit a Full Application by the specified due date and time to be considered for funding under this FOA. Applicants must complete the following application forms found on the EERE eXCHANG E website at https://eere- eXCHANGE.energy.gov/, in accordance with the instructions. All Full Application documents must be marked with the Control Number issued to the applicant. Applicants will receive a control number upon starting their application in EERE eXCHANGE, and should include that control number in the file name of their Full Application submission (i.e., Control number_ Applicant Name_ Full Application). i. Full Application Content Requirements EERE will not review or consider ineligible Full Applications (see Section III. of the FOA). Each Full Application shall be limited to a single community system. Unrelated community systems shall not be consolidated in a single Full Application. Full Applications must conform to the following requirements: Page File NameLimit Component File Format Project Narrative PDF 15 Control Number_LeadOrganization_Project Narrative Resumes PDF 2 Control Number_LeadOrganization_Resume pages s each Letters of Commitment PDF 1 page Control Number_LeadOrganization_LOCs each Statement of Project Objectives MS Word 10 Control Number_LeadOrganization_SOPO SF-424 PDF n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_App424 Budget Justification Workbook MS Excel n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_Budget _Justification Summary/Abstract for Public PDF 1 Control Number_LeadOrganization_Summa Release ry Summary Slide MS 1 Control Number_LeadOrganization_Slide Powerpoint SubrecipientBudgetJustification MS Excel n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_Subreci pie nt_Budget_Justification DOE Work Proposal for FFRDC, if PDF n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_WP applicable (see DOE O 412.1A, Attachment 3) Authorization from cognizant PDF n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_FFRDCA Contracting Officer for FFRDC uth 73 SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities PDF n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_SF-LLL Foreign Entity and Foreign Work Waivers PDF n/a Control Number_LeadOrganization_Waiver Diversity Equity and Inclusion Plan PDF 10 Control Number LeadOrganization DEIP Currentand Pending Support PDF n/a Control Number LeadOrganization CPS Note: Replace "ControlNumber" in the filename structure above with the control numberth at was acquired while starting the Full Application in EERE eXCHANGE. Replace "Lead Organization" with the name of the prime applicant organization. The maximum file size that can be uploaded to the EERE eXCHANGEwebsite is 10MB. Files in excess of 10MB cannot be uploaded, and hence cannot be submitted for review. If a file exceeds 10MB but is still within the maximum page limit specified in the FOA it must be broken into parts and denoted to that effect. For example: ControlNumber_ LeadOrganization_ProjectNarrative_Part_1 Control Number_LeadOrganization_ProjectNarrative_Part_2 EERE will not accept late submissions that resulted from technical difficulties due to uploading filesthat exceed 10MB. EERE provides detailed guidance on the content and form of each component below. ii. Project Narrative The Project Narrative must be submitted in PDF format. The Project Narrative must conform to the following content and form requirements, including maximum page lengths. If applicants exceed the maximum page lengths indicated below, EERE will review only the authorized number of pages and disregard any additional pages. This narrative must address the Merit Review Criteria as discussed in Section V.A.i. of the FOA. Save the Project Narrative in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_ProjectNarrative". Applicants must provide sufficient citations and referencesto the primary research literature tojustify the claims and approaches made in the Project Narrative. However, EERE and reviewers are underno obligation to review cited sources. The Project Narrative to the Full Application may not be more than 15 pages, including the cover page, table of contents, and all citations, charts, graphs, maps, photos, or other graphics, and must include all of the information in the table below. The applicant should consider the weighting of each of the 74 evaluation criteria (See Section V.A.I. of the FOA) when preparing the Project Narrative. The Project Narrative must conform to the following content requirements: SECTION/PAGE LIMIT DESCRIPTION Cover Page The cover page should include the projecttitle, the specific FOA geographic Sub -Topic Area chosen, both the technical and business points of contact, names of all coalition member organizations, names of the senior/key personnel and their organizations, and any statements regarding confidentiality. Project Overview The Project Overview should contain the following information: (Approximately 10% of • Background: The applicant should discuss the background of all of the Project Narrative) the organizations that DOE isfundingthat make up the coalition. • Project Goal: The applicant should explicitly identify an estimate of the amount of geothermal heating and cooling that will be provided in relation to the total amount of heating and cooling used. • DOE Impact: The applicant should discuss the impact that DOE funding would have on the proposed project. Applicants should specifically explain how DOE funding —relative to prior, current, or anticipated funding from other public and private sources —is necessaryto achieve the project objectives. Preliminary Technical The Preliminary Technical and Economic Concept Description should and Economic Concept contain the following information: Description • This section should describe the relevance of the proposed project (Approximately30% of to the goals and objectives of the FOA. The applicant should clearly the Project Narrative) specify the expected outcomes of the project. • The proposed geographic sub -topic area description, including a summary of the currently available relevant physical infrastructure. • A preliminary technical model concept or description of the type of energy use and geothermal models that will be used to analyze, review, and design the system. • An estimate of the current heating and cooling needs and cost. • A preliminary workforce needs assessment describing the nature of the current workforce and training programs most applicable to community geothermal heating and cooling. • A description of the type of analysis and design that will be provided bythe proposed "Analysis/Design"coalition participants. For example, the proposed analysis and design might include: r& o Developing a complete energy profile by gathering information on local stakeholders, demographics, power infrastructure, electricity load profiles, electricity rate and tariff structures, currentand historical energy challenges, and future energy opportunities. o Identifying metrics to measure what's important to the community whetherthat's affordability, environmental impact, or climate resilience. o Conducting an observational study to determine the relationship between currentenergysystems and current socioeconomic conditions, including an equityand workforce assessment, Identifying solutions, technologies, logistics, etc. Workplan The Workplan should include more specific information than that included (Approximately 20% of in the Statement of Project Objectives. The Workplan should contain the the Project Narrative) following information: • Project Objectives: The applicant should provide a clear and concise (high-level) statement of the goals and objectives of the project as well as the expected outcomes. • Project Scope of Work Summary: The applicant should provide a summary description of the overall work scope and approach to achieve the objective(s). The applicant should describe the specific expected end resultof Budget Period 1. • Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Task Description Summary: The Workplan should describe the work to be accomplished and how the applicant will achieve the milestones, will accomplish the Budget Period 1 goal(s), and will produce all deliverables.The Workplan is to be structured with a hierarchy of task and subtasks, which is typical of a standard WBS for any project. The Workplan shall contain a concise description of the specific activities to be conducted during Budget Period 1. The description shall be a full explanation and disclosure of the project being proposed (i.e., a statement such as "We will then complete a proprietary process" is unacceptable). It is the applicant's responsibility to prepare an adequately detailed task plan to describe the proposed projectand the plan for addressing the objectives of this FOA. The summary provided should be consistent with the SOPO. • Milestone Details: While examples of the milestones are included in the SOPO,the applicant should provide milestone descriptions that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timely (SMART) in the workplan, and describe the intended achievement. Unless otherwise specified in the FOA, the minimum requirement is that each project must have at least one milestone per quarter for the duration of the projectwith at least one SMART technical milestone per year (depending on the project, more milestones be necessaryto comprehensively demonstrate progress).The IN& applicant should also provide the means by which the milestone will be verified. • The detailed milestones provided in the workplan should be consistent with the Milestone Summary Table in the SOPO. • End of Budget Period 1 Goal: The applicant should provide a summary of the end of Budget Period 1 goal(s). At a minimum, each project must have one SMART end of Budget Period 1 goal. The summary provided should be consistent with the SOPO. • Project Schedule (Gantt Chart or similar): The applicant should provide a schedule for Budget Period 1 of the project, including task and subtask durations and milestones. • Project Management: The applicant should discuss the coalition's proposed management roles in terms of the required roles described in the FOA, including the following: o The overall approach to and organization for managing the work o The roles of each project coalition member o Anycritical handoffs/interdependenciesamong project coalition members o The systems and practices that will be used to manage the project,such as financial and project management practices o The approachto projectrisk management o A description of how project changes will be handled o If applicable, the approach to Quality Assurance/Control o How communication will be maintained among project coalition members Coalition Qualifications The Coalition Qualifications and Resourcesshould contain the following and Resources information: (Approximately40% of • Organization chart(s) for each coalition member the Project Narrative) • Description of the project coalition's unique qualifications and expertise, includingthose of keysubrecipients. Include each coalition member roles and prior experience performing comparable activities • Descripitions of any Letters of Commitment from both funded and non -funded coalition members and Letters of Support from community stakeholders outside of the projectteam in supportof the coalition • Describe the time commitment of the key coalition membersto support the project 77 • Describe the services to be provided by DOE FFRDCs, if applicable • For your multi -organizational or multi -investigator projects, describe succinctly: o The roles and the work to be performed by each coalition memberand senior/key personnel o Business agreements between the applicant and each PI and senior/key personnel o How the various efforts will be integrated and managed o Process for making decisions on scientific/technical direction o Publication arrangements o Intellectual property issues o Communication plans among coalition members and with external stakeholders iii. Resumes A resume provides information that can be used by reviewersto evaluate the individual's skills, experience, and potential for participation and leadership within the coalition. Resumes should include skills and experiences relevantto the role(s) described in Section I.A.ii that the individual will contribute towards within the broader coalition. Applicants are required to submit two -page resumesforthe Principal Investigatorand all Senior/Key Personnel that include the following: 1. Contact Information; 2. Education and training: Provide institution, major/area, degree, and year for undergraduate, graduate, and postdoctoral training; 3. Research, Professional, and Community Experience: Beginning with the current position, list relevant positions in chronological order with a brief description. List all current academic, professional, community, volunteer, or institutional appointments, foreign or domestic, at the applicant institution or elsewhere, whetheror not remuneration is received, and, whetherfull-time, part-time, or voluntary; 4. Awards and honors; 5. Synergistic Activities: List up to five professional and scholarly activities related to the proposed effort. Save the resumes in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_Resumes". 78 iv. Letters of Commitment Submit letters of commitment from all subrecipient and third party cost share providers. If applicable, also include any letters of commitment from partners/end users (one -page maximum per letter). Save the letters of commitment in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_LOCs". v. Statement of Project Objectives (SOPO) Applicants are required to complete a SOPO, but encouraged to use the provided Community Geothermal Heating and Cooling Design and Deployment SOPO. The SOPO template contains information specific to Budget Period 1 of the proposed project. Details pertaining to Budget Period 2 project objectives will not be required with this submission, rather applications awarded under this FOA if down -selected will complete a continuation SOPO detailing the deployment work to be completed under Budget Period 2. The Budget Period 1 SOPO required with this application is available on EERE eXCHANGEat https://eere- eXCHANGE.energy.gov/. Information included in the provided SOPO, including the Milestone Table, must not exceed 10 pages when printed using standard 8.5 x 11 paper with 1" margins (top, bottom, left, and right) with font not smaller than 12 point (except in figures or tables, which may be 10 point font). Save the SOPO in a single Microsoft Word file using the following convention forthe title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_SOPO". vi. SF-424: Application for Federal Assistance Applicants are required to complete the SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance. This form is available on EERE eXCHANGEat https://eere- eXCHANGE.energy.gov/. Complete all required fields in accordance with the instructions on the form. The list of certifications and assurances in Field 21 can be found at http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational- management/financial-assistance/financial-assistance-forms, under Certifications and Assurances. Note:The datesand dollar amounts on the SF-424 are for the complete project period and not justthe first projectyear, first phase or othersubset of the project period. Save the SF-424 in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_424". vii. Budget lustification Workbook Applicants are required to complete the Budget Justification Workbook. This form is available on EERE eXCHANGEat https://eere-eXCHANGE.energV.gov/. Prime recipients must complete each tab of the Budget Justification Workbook but only for Budget Period 1 of the proposed projector the first 12 months of design work. As part of the continuation application required 30 days prior to the end of Budget Period 1, an updated budget justification for Budget Period 2 will r1:1 be required of projects that applyforthe down-selectprocess, including all work to be performed by the prime recipient and its subrecipients and contractors. Applicants should include costs associated with required annual audits and incurred cost proposals in their proposed budget documents. The "Instructions and Summary" included with the Budget Justification Workbook will auto - populate as the applicant enters information into the Workbook. Applicants must carefully read the "Instructions and Summary" tab provided within the Budget Justification Workbook. Save the Budget Justification Workbook in a single Microsoft Excel file using the following convention forthe title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_Budget_Justification". viii. Summary/Abstract for Public Release Applicants are required to submit a one -page summary/abstract of their project. The project summary/abstract must contain a summary of the proposed activity suitable for dissemination to the public. It should be a self-contained document that identifies the name of the applicant, the project director/principal investigator(s), the project title, the objectives of the project, a description of the project, including methods to be employed, the potential impact of the project (e.g., benefits, outcomes), and major participants (for collaborative projects). This document must not include any proprietary or sensitive business information as DOE may make it available to the public after selections are made. The project summary must not exceed 1 page when printed using standard 8.5 x 11 paper with 1" margins (top, bottom, left, and right) with font not smaller than 12 point. Save the Summary for Public Release in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_Summary". ix. Summary Slide Applicants are required to provide a single slide summarizing the proposed project. This slide is used during the evaluation process. The Summary Slide template requires the following information: • A technology summary; • A description of the technology's impact; • Proposed project goals; • Any key graphics (illustrations, charts and/or tables); • The project's key idea/takeaway; • Project title, prime recipient, Principal Investigator, and senior/key personnel information; and • Requested EERE funds and proposed applicant cost share. 80 Save the Summary Slide in a single Microsoft Powerpointfile using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrgan ization_Slide". x. Subrecipient Budget Justification (if applicable) Applicants must provide a separate budget justification for each subrecipient that is expected to perform work estimated to be more than $250,000 or 25 percent of the total work effort (whichever is less). The budgetjustification must include the same justification information described in the "Budget Justification" section above. Save each subrecipient budgetjustification in a Microsoft Excel file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_Subrecipient_Budget_Justification". A. Budget for DOE/NNSA FFRDC (if applicable) If a DOE/NNSA FFRDC contractor is to perform a portion of the work, the applicant must provide a DOE WP in accordance with the requirements in DOE Order 412.1A, Work Authorization System, Attachment 3, available at: https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0412.1- BOrder-a-chgl-AdmChg Save the WP in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrgan ization_WP". xii. Authorization for non-DOE/NNSA or DOE/NNSA FFRDCs (if applicable) The federal agency sponsoring the FFRDC must authorize in writing the use of the FFRDC on the proposed project and this authorization must be submitted with the application. The use of a FFRDC must be consistent with the contractor's authority under its award. Save the Authorization in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_FFRDCAuth". xiii. SF-LLL: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (required) Prime recipients and subrecipients may not use any federal funds to influence or attempt to influence, directly or indirectly, congressional action on any legislative or appropriation matters. Prime recipients and subrecipients are required to complete and submit SF-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities" (https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-individual-family.html) to ensure that non-federal funds have not been paid and will not be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any of the following in connection with the application: • An officer oremployee of any federal agency; 81 • A Member of Congress; • An officer or employee of Congress; or • An employee of a Memberof Congress. Save the SF-LLL in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_SF-LLL". xiv. Waiver Requests: Foreign Entity and Foreign Work (if applicable) i. Foreign Entity Participation: As set forth in Section III.A.iii., all prime recipients receiving funding under this FOA must be incorporated (or otherwise formed) underthe laws of a State or territory of the United States. To request waiver of this requirement, the applicant must submit an explicit waiver request in the Full Application. Appendix B lists the necessary information that must be included in a requestto waive this requirement. ii. Performance of Work in the United States (Foreign Work Waiver) As set forth in Section IV.I.iii., all work under EERE funding agreements must be performed in the United States. This requirement does not apply to the purchase of supplies and equipment, so a waiver is not required for foreign purchases of these items. However, the prime recipient should make every effortto purchase supplies and equipmentwithin the United States. Appendix B lists the necessary information that must be included in a foreign work waiver reauest. Save the Waivers in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title "ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_Waiver". xv. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan As part of the application, applicants are required to describe how diversity, equity, and inclusion objectives will be incorporated in the project. Specifically, applicants are required to submit a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Plan that describes the actions the applicant will take to fostera welcoming and inclusive environment, support people from groups underrepresented in STEM, advance equity, and encourage the inclusion of individuals from these groups in the project; and the extentthe project activities will be located in or benefit underserved communities (also see Section I.A.iii.). The plan should include at least one SMART milestone per Budget Period supported by metrics to measure the success of the proposed actions, and will be incorporated into the award if selected. The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Plan should contain the following information: 82 • Equity Impacts: the impacts of the proposed project on underserved communities, including social and environmental impacts. • Benefits:The overall benefits of the proposed project, if funded, to underserved communities; and • How diversity, equity, and inclusion objectives will be incorporated in the p roj e ct. The following is a non -exhaustive list of actions that can serve as examples of ways the proposed project could incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion elements. These examples should not be considered either comprehensive or prescriptive. Applicants may include appropriate actions not covered by these examples. a. Include persons from groups underrepresented in STEM as PI, co -PI, and/or other senior personnel; b. Include persons from groups underrepresented in STEM as student researchers or post -doctoral researchers; c. Include faculty or students from Minority Serving Institutions as PI/co-PI, senior personnel, and/or student researchers, as applicable; d. Enhance or collaborate with existing diversity programs at your home organization and/or nearby organizations; e. Collaborate with students, researchers, and staff in Minority Serving Institutions; f. Disseminate results of research and development in Minority Serving Institutions or other appropriate institutions serving underserved communities; g. Implement evidence -based, diversity -focused education programs (such as implicit bias training for staff) in your organization; h. Identify Minority Business Enterprises, Minority Owned Businesses, Woman Owned Businesses and Veteran Owned Businesses to solicit as vendors and sub -contractors for bids on supplies, services and equipment. The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Plan must not exceed 10 pages. Save the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Plan in a single PDF file using the following convention forthe title"ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_DEIP". xvi. Current and Pending Support Current and pending support is intended to allow the identification of potential duplication, overcommitment, potential conflicts of interest or commitment, and all other sources of support. As part of the application, the principal investigator and senior/key personnel at the applicant and subrecipient level must provide a list of all sponsored activities, awards, and appointments, whether paid or unpaid; provided as a gift with terms or conditions or provided as a gift without 83 terms or conditions; full-time, part-time, or voluntary; faculty, visiting, adjunct, or honorary; cash or in -kind; foreign or domestic; governmental or private - sector; directly supporting the individual's research or indirectly supporting the individual by supporting students, research staff, space, equipment, or other research expenses. All foreign government -sponsored talent recruitment programs must be identified in current and pending support. For every activity, list the following items: • The sponsor of the activity or the source of funding • The award or other identifying number • The title of the award or activity. If the title of the award or activity is not descriptive, add a brief description of the research being performed that would identify any overlaps or synergies with the proposed research • The total cost or value of the award or activity, including direct and indirect costs and cost share. For pending proposals, provide the total amount of requested funding • The award period (start date — end date) • The person-monthsof effort per year being dedicated to the award or activity If required to identify overlap, duplication of effort, or synergistic efforts, append a description of the other award or activity to the current and pending support. Details of any obligations, contractual or otherwise, to any program, entity, or organization sponsored by a foreign government must be provided on request to eitherthe applicant institution or DOE. Pls and senior/key personnel must provide a separate disclosure statement listing the required information above regarding current and pending support. Each individual must sign and date their respective disclosure statement and include the following certification statement: I, [Full Name and Title], certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the information contained in this Current and Pending Support Disclosure Statement is true, complete and accurate. I understand that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, misrepresentations, half-truths, or omissions of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 287, and 31 U.S.C. 3729-3730 and 3801-3812). 1 further understand and agree that (1) the statements and representations made herein are material to DOE's funding decision, and (2) 1 have a responsibility to update the disclosures 84 during the period of performance of the award should circumstances change which impact the responses provided above. The information may be provided in the format approved by the National Science Foundation (NSF), which may be generated by the Science Experts Network Curriculum Vita (SciENcv), a cooperative venture maintained at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sciencv/, and is also available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/nsfapprovedformats/cps.pdf. The use of a format required by another agency is intended to reduce the administrative burden to researchers by promoting the use of common formats. If the NSF format is used, the individual must still include a signature, date, and a certification statement using the language included in the paragraph above. Save the Current and Pending Support in a single PDF file using the following convention for the title"ControlNumber_LeadOrganization_CPS". D. Content and Form of Replies to Reviewer Comments If replies to reviewer comments are applicable, EERE will provide applicants with reviewer comments following the evaluation of all eligible Full Applications. Applicants will have a brief opportunity to review the comments and to prepare a short Reply to Reviewer Comments responding to the comments howeverthey desire or supplementing their Full Application. The Reply to Reviewer Comments is an optional submission; applicants are not required to submit a Reply to Reviewer Comments. EERE will post the Reviewer Comments in EERE eXCHANGE. The expected submission deadline is on the cover page of the FOA; however, it is the applicant's responsibility to monitor EERE eXCHANGE in the eventthat the expected date changes. The deadline will not be extended forapplicants who are unable to timely submit their reply due to failure to check EERE eXCHANGEor relying on the expected date alone. Applicants should anticipate having approximately three (3) business days to submit Replies to Reviewer Comments. EERE will not review or consider ineligible Replies to Reviewer Comments (see Section III. of the FOA). EERE will review and consider each eligible Full Application, even if no Reply is submitted or if the Reply is found to be ineligible. Replies to Reviewer Comments must conform to the following content and form requirements, including maximum page lengths, described below. If a Reply to Reviewer Comments is more than three (3) pages in length, EERE will reviewonly the first three (3) pages and disregard any additional pages. 85 ID as Mo Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessor! 9 September 2022 ORaber 2022 14 19 24 29 3 8 13 18 23 28 3 8 13 1 W4 Project Team Reviews Schedule & Task Matrix W4 Project Team Membership Finalized w. Project Team Resumes W4 Project Team Role Descriptions (1-4) W4 Preliminary Technical & Economic Concept w. Project Budget Finalized W. Outlines (Project Narrative; Statement of Objectives; Diversity, Equity& Inclusion Plan) W4 Team Members Provide Content for Outlines w. Standard Forms & Disclosure Content W. Work Session: Discuss Additional Content Needs W4 Draft Project Narrative w. Draft Statement of Project Objectives W. Draft Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Plan W4 Review: Project Narrative w. Review: Statement of Project Objectives w. Review: Draft Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Plan w4 Draft Summary/Abstract for Public Release W. Draft Summary Slide (PowerPoint) w. Review: Summary/Abstract for Public Release w4 Review: Summary Slide (PowerPoint) W. Letters of Commitment/Support W4 Final Edits & Compilation W4 Submit Final Application Materials + Application Deadline 1 day 3 days 3 days 5 days 5 days 3 days 1 day 6 days 2 days 1 day 7 days 7 days 7 days 3 days 3 days 3 days 1 day 1 day 1 day 1 day 28 days 2 days 1 day 1 day Mon 8/22/22 Mon 8/22/22 Tue 8/23/22 Thu 8/25/22 Fri 8/26/22 Tue 8/30/22 Fri 8/26/22 Thu 9/1/22 Fri 8/26/22 Thu 9/1/22 Fri 9/2/22 Tue 9/6/22 Wed 9/7/22 Wed 9/7/22 Thu 9/8/22 Thu 9/15/22 Fri 9/16/22 Mon 9/19/22 Fri 9/16/22 Fri 9/16/22 Mon 9/19/22 Tue 9/27/22 Mon 9/19/22 Tue 9/27/22 Mon 9/19/22 Tue 9/27/22 Wed 9/28/22 Fri 9/30/22 Wed 9/28/22 Fri 9/30/22 Wed 9/28/22 Fri 9/30/22 Mon 10/3/22 Mon 10/3/22 Mon 10/3/22 Mon 10/3/22 Tue 10/4/22 Tue 10/4/22 Tue 10/4/22 Tue 10/4/22 Fri 8/26/22 Tue 10/4/22 Wed 10/5/22 Thu 10/6/22 Fri 10/7/22 Fri 10/7/22 Tue 10/11/22 Tue 10/11/22 1 2 2 2 5 6 7 8 8 10 10 10 11 12 13 14,15,16 14,15,16 17 18 2 19,20,21 22 i6 ♦ 10/7 11 10/11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Project: Community Geotherma Date: Thu 8/18/22 Task Split ......................... Milestone ♦ Summary 0------ Project Summary Manual Task Inactive Task Duration -only Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup Inactive Summary t 0 Manual Summary r -------- Start -only C Deadline 4 Finish -only ] Progress External Tasks Manual Progress I External Milestone O Page 1 HMS Project No. 22098 FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA PREPARED FOR: City of Seward P.O. Box 167 Seward, Alaska 99664 August 31, 2022 YN. 4103 Minnesota Drive • Anchorage, Alaska 99503 p: 907.561.1653 • f. 907.562.0420 • e: mail@hmsalaska.com CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS Level of Documents: (34) final design document drawings Date: July 30, 2020 Provided By: Your Clean Energy, LLC, and their subconsultants of Anchorage, Alaska RATES Pricing is based on current material, equipment and freight costs. Labor Rates: A.S. Title 36 working 60 hours per week Premium Time: 16.70% Subcontractor's Mark -Up: 25.00% BIDDING ASSUMPTIONS Contract: Standard construction contract without restrictive bidding clauses Bidding Situation: Competitive bids assumed Bid Date: October 2022 Start of Construction: April 1, 2023 Months to Complete: Within (3) months completion EXCLUDED COSTS 1. A/E design fees 2. Furniture, furnishings and equipment (except those specifically included) 3. Remediation of contaminated soils or abatement of any hazardous materials, if found during construction 4. Owner furnished equipment 88 PAGE 2 DATE: 8/31 /2022 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT PAGE 3 SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE DATE: 8/31/2022 HMS Project No.: 22098 GENERAL When included in HMS Inc.'s scope of services, opinions or estimates of probable construction costs are prepared on the basis of HMS Inc.'s experience and qualifications and represent HMS Inc.'s judgment as a professional generally familiar with the industry. However, since HMS Inc. has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, over contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, HMS Inc. cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from HMS Inc.'s opinions or estimates of probable construction cost. This estimate assumes escalation based on a 12-month rolling average of the U.S. Consumer Price Index. HMS Inc. will continue to monitor this, as well as other international, domestic and local events, and the resulting construction climate, and will adjust costs and contingencies as deemed appropriate. Due to the rapidly evolving nature of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and its affect on the economy, and more specifically the construction industry, HMS Inc. is incorporating an additional contingency titled 'Unique Market Risk'. The amount provided for in the estimate will be adjusted as the situation continues to change and the effect on construction pricing becomes more quantifiable. This estimate incorporates scope reductions and associated reduced quantities as provided by the project designer during the initial August 25, 2020, estimate. 89 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 FINAL DESIGN COST SUMMARY PAGE 4 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GROUND SOURCE BOREHOLE FIELD AND VERTICAL PIPING Material... $ 308,411 $ 68,311 Total $ 376,722 BURIED MAINS BETWEEN LIBRARY AND ANNEX 8,631 16,856 25,487 SOURCE MAINS - WATERFRONT TO LIBRARY 94,761 113,531 208,292 LIBRARY BASEMENT ARCHITECTURAL WORK 15,383 15,088 30,471 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK 334,222 123,539 457,761 CITY ANNEX MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK 7,785 7,521 15,306 SUBTOTAL: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $ 769,193 $ 344, 846 $ 1,114, 039 357,269 SUBTOTAL: CONTINGENCIES $ 1,471,308 249,125 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 1,720,433 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (ASSUMED NO CHANGE) $ 136,880 INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATING SERVICES (ASSUMED NO CHANGE) 7,339 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (ASSUMED NO CHANGE) 29,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 1,893,652 AEA REF GRANT AMOUNT (PER 2020 AMOUNT PROVIDED) $ 725,000 CITY MATCH COMMITTED 2015 -157,497 ADDITIONAL CITY MATCH REQUIRED TO BUILD IN 202212023: $ 1,011,155 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 5 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GROUND SOURCE BOREHOLE FIELD AND VERTICAL PIPING QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 011 - SITE DEMOLITION Remove wood at horseshoe toss area Remove and store horseshoe pins 012 - SITE PREPARATION Site survey and staking SWPPP and implementation SWPPP maintenance and erosion control Temporary construction fencing and gates Traffic control (minimal) 013 - SITE IMPROVEMENTS Wood fence at horseshoe area Sand for horseshoe pits 014 - SITE MECHANICAL Excavate for wellfield and manifolds and stockpile Mobilize/demobilize drilling 48 LF 2.25 108 2.25 108 1 LOT 50.00 50 50.00 50 1 LOT 1000.00 1,000 3000.00 3,000 4000.00 4,000 1 LOT 2500.00 2,500 1500.00 1,500 4000.00 4,000 2 MOS 350.00 700 600.00 1,200 950.00 1,900 600 LF 7.50 4,500 4.80 2,880 12.30 7,380 4 WKS 300.00 1,200 3900.00 15,600 4200.00 16,800 48 LF 24.50 1,176 13.00 624 37.50 1,800 2 CY 26.00 52 15.00 30 41.00 82 414 CY 4.35 1,801 9.00 3,726 13.35 5,527 1 LOT 3000.00 3,000 5000.00 5,000 8000.00 8,000 91 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 6 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GROUND SOURCE BOREHOLE FIELD AND VERTICAL PIPING QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 014 - SITE MECHANICAL (Continued) 4" diameter HDPE manifold piping 4" diameter insulated HDPE supply and return piping 4" diameter HDPE manifold fitting 4" diameter insulated HDPE coupling HDPE SDR17 to SDR11 transition 2" rigid insulation Sand bedding for piping Backfill from stockpile Dispose of excess material Topsoil to affected areas Hydroseed affected areas 3/4" double loop installed to 240'0" below grade SUBTOTAL: 170 LF 5.57 947 9.51 1,617 15.08 2,564 194 LF 30.70 5,956 11.60 2,250 42.30 8,206 12 EA 35.00 420 125.00 1,500 160.00 1,920 2 EA 260.00 520 130.00 260 390.00 780 2 EA 270.00 540 150.00 300 420.00 840 945 SF 1.50 1,418 1.00 945 2.50 2,363 126 CY 26.00 3,276 12.00 1,512 38.00 4,788 320 CY 9.00 2,880 9.00 2,880 83 CY 8.00 664 8.00 664 42 CY 35.00 1,470 12.00 504 47.00 1,974 2.3 MSF 110.00 253 295.00 679 405.00 932 8 EA 27000.00 216,000 27000.00 216,000 S246,729 $ 46, 829 S293,558 92 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 7 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GROUND SOURCE BOREHOLE FIELD AND VERTICAL PIPING QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAL/LABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL Labor Premium Time SUBTOTAL: Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 16.70% 25.00% 7,820 7,820 $ 246, 729 $ 54, 649 $ 301, 378 61,682 13,662 75,344 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 308,411 $ 68,311 $ 376,722 93 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 8 DATE: 8/31 /2022 BURIED MAINS BETWEEN LIBRARYAND ANNEX QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 014 - SITE MECHANICAL Excavate and stockpile for piping 1 1/2" diameter ecoflex twin insulated piping 1 1/2" diameter twin end cap 2" rigid insulation Sand bedding Backfill from stockpile Type 2 gravel Type 2A gravel Extra for special equipment or hand excavation at utility crossings Traffic barriers and flaggers (minimal) SUBTOTAL: Labor Premium Time SUBTOTAL: 100 CY 3.00 300 12.00 1,200 15.00 1,500 110 LF 34.50 3,795 27.00 2,970 61.50 6,765 2 EA 87.00 174 123.00 246 210.00 420 440 SF 1.35 594 1.00 440 2.35 1,034 12 CY 26.00 312 12.00 144 38.00 456 60 CY 9.00 540 9.00 540 16 CY 18.00 288 9.00 144 27.00 432 19 CY 18.00 342 9.00 171 27.00 513 2 EA 350.00 700 850.00 1,700 1200.00 2,400 1 WK 400.00 400 4000.00 4,000 4400.00 4,400 $ 6,905 $ 11,555 $ 18,460 16.70% 1,930 1,930 $ 6, 905 $ 13, 485 $ 20, 390 94 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 9 DATE: 8/31 /2022 BURIED MAINS BETWEEN LIBRARYAND ANNEX QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAL/LABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 25.00% 1,726 3,371 5,097 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 8,631 $ 16,856 $ 25,487 95 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 10 DATE: 8/31 /2022 SOURCE MAINS - WATERFRONT TO LIBRARY QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 011 - SITE DEMOLITION Cut asphalt at street crossings 120 LF 1.18 142 1.20 144 2.38 286 Demolish asphalt at street crossings and dispose 480 SF 2.80 1,344 2.80 1,344 Cut concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter at library 20 LF 1.35 27 2.20 44 3.55 71 Demolish concrete sidewalk and curb and gutter and dispose 120 SF 7.00 840 7.00 840 013 - SITE IMPROVEMENTS 2" leveling course, compacted 6 CY 24.00 144 12.00 72 36.00 216 3" asphalt at street crossings 480 SF 3.50 1,680 2.25 1,080 5.75 2,760 Match existing asphalt 120 LF 2.50 300 3.70 444 6.20 744 Concrete sidewalk to library 100 SF 6.75 675 8.75 875 15.50 1,550 Curb and gutter (all types) 10 LF 15.00 150 30.00 300 45.00 450 Topsoil to affected areas 16 CY 35.00 560 10.00 160 45.00 720 Hydroseed affected areas 0.9 MSF 110.00 99 295.00 266 405.00 365 014 - SITE MECHANICAL Excavate and stockpile for piping 600 CY 3.00 1,800 12.00 7,200 15.00 9,000 96 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 11 DATE: 8/31 /2022 SOURCE MAINS - WATERFRONT TO LIBRARY QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 014 - SITE MECHANICAL (Continued) 4" diameter insulated HDPE supply and return piping 4" diameter insulated HDPE coupling 4" diameter HDPE fitting Sand bedding for piping Backfill from stockpile Type 1 fill Type 2 fill Dispose of excess material 18" diameter CMP culvert (OFCI) Type 2A gravel backfill and surfacing Grade drainage swale to facilitate water flow through OFCI culvert Extra for special equipment or hand excavation at utility crossings 1,072 LF 30.70 32,910 11.60 12,435 42.30 45,345 26 EA 260.00 6,760 130.00 3,380 390.00 10,140 18 EA 884.00 15,912 160.00 2,880 1044.00 18,792 109 CY 26.00 2,834 12.00 1,308 38.00 4,142 442 CY 3.00 1,326 9.50 4,199 12.50 5,525 10 CY 20.00 200 9.50 95 29.50 295 105 CY 18.00 1,890 9.50 998 27.50 2,888 158 CY 8.00 1,264 8.00 1,264 NIC NIC NIC 6 EA 400.00 2,400 750.00 4,500 1150.00 6,900 97 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 12 DATE: 8/31 /2022 SOURCE MAINS - WATERFRONT TO LIBRARY QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 014 - SITE MECHANICAL (Continued) Traffic control SUBTOTAL: Labor Premium Time SUBTOTAL: Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 4 WKS 1500.00 6,000 8500.00 34,000 10000.00 40,000 S75,809 S77,828 S153,637 16.70% 12,997 12,997 S75,809 S90,825 S166,634 25.00% 18,952 22,706 41,658 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 94,761 $ 113,531 $ 208,292 98 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 13 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT ARCHITECTURAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAL/LABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 011 - SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION Saw cut slab for sump 6 LF 0.35 2 20.00 120 20.35 122 Excavate for sump basin 1 LOT 40.00 40 40.00 40 031 - FLOOR CONSTRUCTION Drilled and epoxied dowel 30 EA 11.50 345 18.00 540 29.50 885 4" concrete curb 57 LF 9.00 513 10.00 570 19.00 1,083 ADA ramp and landings 148 SF 9.50 1,406 5.50 814 15.00 2,220 Housekeeping pads 104 SF 7.00 728 5.00 520 12.00 1,248 061 - PARTITIONS AND DOORS Partitions 3 5/8" metal studs, 16" o/c, with track 650 SF 2.35 1,528 1.45 943 3.80 2,471 Blocking/backing 20 LF 1.10 22 1.50 30 2.60 52 5/8" Type X gypboard, both sides 1,300 SF 0.75 975 1.65 2,145 2.40 3,120 4" sound batts 650 SF 0.70 455 0.45 293 1.15 748 Sealants at new construction to existing wall joint and wall penetrations 70 LF 0.35 25 0.75 53 1.10 78 99 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 14 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT ARCHITECTURAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 061 - PARTITIONS AND DOORS (Continued) Doors 6'0"x7'0" hollow metal double door assembly with narrow relites and panic bar hardware, complete 062 - INTERIOR FINISHES Seal concrete for ramp and landing Paint safety stripe at ramp and landing 4" rubber base Paint walls Paint hollow metal door and frame SUBTOTAL: Labor Premium Time SUBTOTAL: Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 1 PR 5500.00 5,500 1450.00 1,450 6950.00 6,950 148 SF 0.35 1 LOT 85.00 120 LF 1.50 1,300 SF 0.35 100 SF 0.35 16.70% 25.00% 52 1.25 185 1.60 237 85 70.00 70 155.00 155 180 1.50 180 3.00 360 455 1.70 2,210 2.05 2,665 35 1.80 180 2.15 215 $ 12, 306 $ 10, 343 S22,649 1,727 1,727 S12,306 $ 12, 070 S24,376 3,077 3,018 6,095 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 15,383 $ 15,088 $ 30,471 100 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 15 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL Heat pump 1 and 2, material pricing provided by designer (FOB Kobe, Japan) Ocean freight on heat pump 1 to 2 from Kobe to Seward (container price) Heat pump testing and start-up (all) CP-1: 50 GPH, fractional HP, 115 volt, single phase circulation pump for condensate unit (packaged condensate unit) CP-100 to 101: 5 HP, 480 volt, 3 phase, 180 GPM source loop circulating pump CP-120: 178 watt, 115 volt, single phase circulation pump serves cooling FCUs 450 watt, 115 volt, single phase heat pump source side circulation pump 370 watt, 115 volt, single phase heat pump load side circulating pump CP-400 to 401: 108 watt, 115 volt, single phase heating loop circulation pump 2 EA 67275.00 134,550 1 LOT 8500.00 8,500 1 LOT 5500.00 1 EA 611.00 611 225.00 2 EA 4300.00 8,600 700.00 1 EA 1825.00 1,825 270.00 2 EA 3328.00 6,656 337.00 2 EA 2800.00 5,600 337.00 2 EA 300.00 600 88.00 101 67275.00 134,550 8500.00 8,500 5,500 5500.00 5,500 225 836.00 836 1,400 5000.00 10,000 270 2095.00 2,095 674 3665.00 7,330 674 3137.00 6,274 176 388.00 776 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 16 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) CP-500, 501, 502, 510 and 511: 108 watt, 115 volt, single phase various heat loop circulation pump 5 EA 300.00 1,500 88.00 440 388.00 1,940 CP-520: 185 watt, 115 volt, single phase basement CUH circulation pump 1 EA 1890.00 1,890 248.00 248 2138.00 2,138 AS-400: 2" air separator 1 EA 1850.00 1,850 240.00 240 2090.00 2,090 HX-500: 30 GPM, brazed plate heat exchanger 1 EA 1950.00 1,950 337.00 337 2287.00 2,287 ET-100: 8/2.4 gallon expansion tank, bladder type 1 EA 945.00 945 86.00 86 1031.00 1,031 ET-400: 77/34 gallon expansion tank, bladder type 1 EA 4000.00 4,000 160.00 160 4160.00 4,160 FC-120: 64.7 MBH, 1,600 CFM, 3/4 HP fan coil unit 1 EA 2530.00 2,530 700.00 700 3230.00 3,230 FC-121: 64.7 MBH, 1,600 CFM, 3/4 HP fan coil unit 1 EA 2530.00 2,530 700.00 700 3230.00 3,230 FC-520: 59 MBH, 720 CFM fan coil unit 1 EA 2100.00 2,100 550.00 550 2650.00 2,650 BT-400: 120 gallon buffer tank 1 EA 1878.00 1,878 250.00 250 2128.00 2,128 Chemical pot feeder 2 EA 399.00 798 170.00 340 569.00 1,138 Glycol media With Testing and Commissioning 102 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 17 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Plumbing SP-1: 16 GPM, 1/6 HP sump pump, including prefabricated sump insert 1 EA 456.00 456 170.00 170 626.00 626 4" diameter Schedule 80 PVC piping 70 LF 43.00 3,010 27.00 1,890 70.00 4,900 2" diameter Schedule 80 PVC piping 50 LF 20.50 1,025 22.60 1,130 43.10 2,155 1 1/2" diameter Schedule 80 PVC piping 130 LF 16.75 2,178 18.20 2,366 34.95 4,544 1 1/4" diameter Schedule 80 PVC piping 50 LF 15.40 770 16.00 800 31.40 1,570 2 1/2" diameter Aquatherm piping 10 LF 12.25 123 23.87 239 36.12 362 2" diameter Aquatherm piping 180 LF 8.61 1,550 22.60 4,068 31.21 5,618 1 1/2" diameter Aquatherm piping 250 LF 5.60 1,400 18.20 4,550 23.80 5,950 1 1/4" diameter Aquatherm piping 50 LF 3.53 177 16.00 800 19.53 977 1" diameter Aquatherm piping 40 LF 2.30 92 4.60 184 6.90 276 4" diameter Schedule 80 PVC fitting 10 EA 42.00 420 75.00 750 117.00 1,170 2 1/2" diameter Schedule 80 PVC fitting 6 EA 21.00 126 49.60 298 70.60 424 1 1/2" diameter Schedule 80 PVC fitting 26 EA 8.65 225 34.10 887 42.75 1,112 103 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 18 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Plumbing (Continued) 1 1/4" diameter Schedule 80 PVC fitting 2 1/2" diameter Aquatherm fitting 2" diameter Aquatherm fitting 1 1/2" diameter Aquatherm fitting 1 1/4" diameter Aquatherm fitting 1" diameter Aquatherm fitting 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 2 1/2" diameter pipe 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 2" diameter pipe 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 1 1/2" diameter pipe 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 1 1/4" diameter pipe 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 1" diameter pipe 10 EA 8.10 81 30.69 307 38.79 388 5 EA 203.00 1,015 90.00 450 293.00 1,465 18 EA 146.00 2,628 65.00 1,170 211.00 3,798 42 EA 123.00 5,166 52.00 2,184 175.00 7,350 10 EA 91.00 910 50.00 500 141.00 1,410 8 EA 49.50 396 40.00 320 89.50 716 10 LF 4.42 44 5.80 58 10.22 102 180 LF 3.80 684 5.80 1,044 9.60 1,728 250 LF 3.31 828 4.35 1,088 7.66 1,916 50 LF 3.10 155 4.00 200 7.10 355 40 LF 2.20 88 3.70 148 5.90 236 104 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 19 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Plumbing (Continued) 2 1/2" diameter ball valve 22 EA 264.00 5,808 90.00 1,980 354.00 7,788 2" diameter ball valve 35 EA 182.00 6,370 70.00 2,450 252.00 8,820 1 1/2" diameter ball valve 26 EA 155.00 4,030 57.00 1,482 212.00 5,512 1 1/4" diameter ball valve 15 EA 132.00 1,980 48.00 720 180.00 2,700 1" diameter ball valve 8 EA 87.00 696 41.00 328 128.00 1,024 3/4" diameter ball valve 5 EA 68.00 340 32.00 160 100.00 500 2 1/2" diameter check valve 11 EA 507.00 5,577 251.00 2,761 758.00 8,338 2" diameter check valve 7 EA 428.00 2,996 150.00 1,050 578.00 4,046 1 1/2" diameter check valve 11 EA 300.00 3,300 48.00 528 348.00 3,828 1 1/4" diameter check valve 3 EA 250.00 750 44.00 132 294.00 882 1" diameter check valve 2 EA 179.00 358 33.00 66 212.00 424 2 1/2" diameter balancing valve 5 EA 858.00 4,290 90.00 450 948.00 4,740 2" diameter balancing valve 3 EA 380.00 1,140 65.00 195 445.00 1,335 105 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 20 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Plumbing (Continued) 1 1/2" diameter balancing valve 4 EA 279.00 1,116 52.00 208 331.00 1,324 1 1/4" diameter balancing valve 5 EA 225.00 1,125 47.00 235 272.00 1,360 1" diameter balancing valve 4 EA 175.00 700 35.00 140 210.00 840 3/4" diameter drain valve 8 EA 34.00 272 37.00 296 71.00 568 Auto air vent 1 EA 79.00 79 65.00 65 144.00 144 Pressure relief valve 2 EA 160.00 320 55.00 110 215.00 430 2" wye strainer 4 EA 249.00 996 58.00 232 307.00 1,228 3/4" wye strainer 1 EA 60.00 60 35.00 35 95.00 95 Thermometer 8 EA 82.00 656 46.00 368 128.00 1,024 Pressure gauge 35 EA 95.00 3,325 55.00 1,925 150.00 5,250 Control point 20 EA 880.00 17,600 700.00 14,000 1580.00 31,600 1/2" diameter EMT conduit 500 LF 1.08 540 4.83 2,415 5.91 2,955 Control wiring 1,170 LF 0.52 608 0.64 749 1.16 1,357 106 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 21 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Plumbing (Continued) Pressure test, flush system, and antifreeze protection for source heat loop (budgetary quote by Chuck Renfro, Energy Efficiency Associates, 907-244-5008) Test, balance and commission building heat SUBTOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL: Labor Premium Time TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL: 09 - ELECTRICAL Service and Distribution 13 jaw meter base in Nema 3R 36"x36"x11", 400 amp, 480/277 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire, Nema 3R CT cabinet 300 amp, 480/277 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire Nema 3R service disconnect 1 LOT 17500.00 17,500 Included 17500.00 17,500 40 HRS 160.00 6,400 160.00 6,400 S294,992 S78,051 S373,043 16.70% 13,035 13,035 S294,992 S91,086 S386,078 1 EA 1347.00 1,347 675.00 675 2022.00 2,022 1 EA 380.00 380 825.00 825 1205.00 1,205 1 EA 2628.00 2.628 875.00 875 3503.00 3.503 107 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 22 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL (Continued) Service and Distribution (Continued) 800 amp, 3 phase power monitor with bac/net interface 1 EA 1645.00 1,645 450.00 450 2095.00 2,095 Panel A: 400 amp, 480/277 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire, 30 circuit Nema 3R main panel 1 EA 6600.00 6,600 2518.00 2,518 9118.00 9,118 Panel B: 100 amp, 208/120 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire, 30 circuit, subpanel 1 EA 2500.00 2,500 1650.00 1,650 4150.00 4,150 30 KVA, 48OD: 208/120 volt, 3 phase Nema 3R transformer 1 EA 5275.00 5,275 1511.00 1,511 6786.00 6,786 4" diameter galvanized rigid steel conduit stub out for service lateral 20 LF 37.30 746 35.00 700 72.30 1,446 3" diameter EMT conduit 80 LF 13.46 1,077 16.05 1,284 29.51 2,361 1 1/2" diameter EMT conduit 15 LF 5.25 79 7.34 110 12.59 189 1" diameter EMT conduit 170 LF 2.38 405 7.20 1,224 9.58 1,629 3/4" diameter EMT conduit 75 LF 1.46 110 6.40 480 7.86 590 #350 MCM wire 300 LF 9.60 2,880 6.00 1,800 15.60 4,680 #2 XHHW copper wire 100 LF 3.23 323 1.65 165 4.88 488 108 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 23 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL (Continued) Service and Distribution (Continued) #4 XHHW copper wire 100 LF 2.10 210 1.47 147 3.57 357 #6XHHWcopper wire 840 LF 1.43 1,201 1.26 1,058 2.69 2,259 #8 XHHW copper wire 350 LF 0.94 329 1.05 368 1.99 697 #12 XHHW copper wire 280 LF 0.41 115 0.65 182 1.06 297 Test and tag service 1 LOT 250.00 250 1250.00 1,250 1500.00 1,500 Lighting and Power Fractional HP, single phase motor connection 16 EA 30.00 480 75.00 1,200 105.00 1,680 5 HP, 3 phase motor connection 2 EA 135.00 270 225.00 450 360.00 720 Junction box with power motor, including transformer 2 EA 390.00 780 212.00 424 602.00 1,204 Exit sign/emergency light fixture 1 EA 160.00 160 110.00 110 270.00 270 L-1: 48" LED strip light, 4,500 lumens 3 EA 190.00 570 90.00 270 280.00 840 Duplex receptacle 2 EA 15.00 30 45.00 90 60.00 120 Single pole switch 1 EA 13.00 13 45.00 45 58.00 58 109 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 24 DATE: 8/31 /2022 LIBRARY BASEMENT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL (Continued) Lighting and Power (Continued) Disconnect switch at pumps and units 9 EA 27.00 1/2" diameter EMT conduit 210 LF 1.08 #12 XHHW copper wire 880 LF 0.41 Test and tag 1 LOT 150.00 SUBTOTAL 09 -ELECTRICAL: Labor Premium Time 16.70% SUBTOTAL: Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 25.00% TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL: 243 50.00 450 77.00 693 227 4.83 1,014 5.91 1,241 361 0.65 572 1.06 933 150 350.00 350 500.00 500 S31,384 S22,247 S53,631 3,715 3,715 $ 31,384 $ 25.962 $ 57,346 7,846 6,491 14,337 S39,230 S32,453 S71,683 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 334,222 $ 123,539 $ 457,761 110 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 25 DATE: 8/31 /2022 CITYANNEX MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL HX-510: 16 GPM, brazed plate heat exchanger 1 EA 1110.00 1,110 295.00 295 1405.00 1,405 CP-512: 87 watt, 115 volt, single phase City Annex loop circulation pump heat exchanger 1 EA 300.00 300 88.00 88 388.00 388 1 1/2" diameter Aquatherm piping 90 LF 5.60 504 18.20 1,638 23.80 2,142 1 1/2" diameter Aquatherm fitting 18 EA 123.00 2,214 52.00 936 175.00 3,150 1" fiberglass pipe insulation to 1 1/2" diameter pipe 90 LF 3.31 298 4.35 392 7.66 690 1 1/2" diameter ball valve 6 EA 155.00 930 57.00 342 212.00 1,272 1 1/2" wye strainer, screwed 1 EA 189.00 189 48.00 48 237.00 237 1 1/2" diameter check valve 1 EA 300.00 300 48.00 48 348.00 348 1 1/2" diameter balancing valve 1 EA 279.00 279 52.00 52 331.00 331 Thermometer 4 EA 82.00 328 46.00 184 128.00 512 Modify/recircuit existing control point 3 EA 150.00 450 250.00 750 400.00 1,200 Heat pump remote panel 1 EA 295.00 295 170.00 170 465.00 465 Temperature controller 1 EA 415.00 415 196.00 196 611.00 611 ME CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 26 DATE: 8/31 /2022 CITYANNEX MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL (Continued) Test, balance, and commission SUBTOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL: Labor Premium Time TOTAL 08 - MECHANICAL: 09 - ELECTRICAL Fractional HP, single phase motor connection 1/2" diameter EMT conduit #12 XHHW copper wire Test and tag SUBTOTAL 09 -ELECTRICAL: Labor Premium Time SUBTOTAL 09 -ELECTRICAL: 1 LOT 750.00 750 750.00 750 $ 7,612 $ 5,889 $ 13,501 16.70% 983 983 $ 7,612 $ 6,872 $ 14,484 1 EA 30.00 30 75.00 75 105.00 105 25 LF 1.08 27 4.83 121 5.91 148 75 LF 0.41 31 0.65 49 1.06 80 1 LOT 50.00 50 200.00 200 250.00 250 $ 138 $ 445 $ 583 16.70% 74 74 $ 138 $ 519 $ 657 112 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 27 DATE: 8/31 /2022 CITYANNEX MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAL/LABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL (Continued) Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Material and Labor 25.00% 35 130 165 TOTAL 09 - ELECTRICAL: $ 173 $ 649 $ 822 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 7,785 $ 7,521 $ 15,306 113 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 28 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL MOBILIZATION Mobilization/demobilization and set-up Freight (material and equipment) Miscellaneous air freight OPERATION COSTS Project manager Supervision/quality control Field engineering Site offices and equipment Consumables Construction equipment and tools Temporary utilities Communications Porta cans and maintenance As-builts, schedules, submittals, etc. 1 LOT 2500.00 2,500 5000.00 5,000 7500.00 250 LBS 1.75 438 0.25 63 2.00 7,500 With Unit Rates 501 40 HRS 120.00 4,800 120.00 4,800 4 MOS 200.00 800 13000.00 52,000 13200.00 52,800 12 HRS 160.00 1,920 160.00 1,920 3 MOS 850.00 2,550 200.00 600 1050.00 3,150 3 MOS 400.00 1,200 400.00 1,200 3 MOS 4500.00 13,500 500.00 1,500 5000.00 15,000 3 MOS 850.00 2,550 50.00 150 900.00 2,700 3 MOS 850.00 2,550 850.00 2,550 3 MOS 275.00 825 50.00 150 325.00 975 1 LOT 350.00 350 2550.00 2,550 2900.00 2,900 114 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 29 DATE: 8/31 /2022 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL OPERATION COSTS (Continued) Regular clean-up Final clean-up, punch list and trade damage repairs Alaska Dept. of Labor contract labor filing fee Per diem Road travel costs from Anchorage SUBTOTAL: Home Office Overhead and Profit Bonds Insurances 3 MOS 100.00 300 600.00 1,800 700.00 2,100 1,250 SF 0.20 250 0.30 375 0.50 625 1 LOT 5000.00 5,000 5000.00 5,000 110 MD 226.00 24,860 226.00 24,860 12 RT 175.00 2,100 175.00 2,100 S59,773 S70,908 S130,681 3.00% 37,342 12.50% 160,258 0.85% 12,260 1.15% 16,728 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 357,269 115 CITY OF SEWARD GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP - DISTRICT HEAT PROJECT SEWARD, ALASKA FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PRICING UPDATE HMS Project No.: 22098 PAGE 30 DATE: 8/31 /2022 CONTINGENCIES QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL UNIT RATE TOTAL MATERIAULABOR RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL ESTIMATOR'S CONTINGENCY The estimator's allowance for site unknowns and engineering requirements that are not apparent in the design documentation 10.00% $ 147,131 Unique market risk 5.00% $ 80,922 ESCALATION CONTINGENCY The allowance for escalation from the date of estimate to the proposed bid date of October 2022 at the rate of 7.43% per annum (2 months) 1.24% $ 21,072 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 249,125 116 SEWARD MARINE INDUSTRIAL CENTER (SMIC) BENCH DRAFT DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED JULY 2022 FOR: City of Seward • 410Adams Street, Seward,Alaska 99664 ,4& R&M Consultants, Inc • gioi Vanguard Drive Anchorage, AK 995o8 • 907.522.1707 `NVA CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ ExistingConditions Overview............................................................................................. OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS.............................................................................................2 LandUse & Zoning..............................................................................................................2 IntendedLand Use.........................................................................................................................................2 Zoning............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Development Requirements........................................................................................................................3 Required Public Improvements...................................................................................................................3 Geotech.................................................................................................................................4 Access.................................................................................................................................... 4 Utilities..................................................................................................................................5 WaterSource..................................................................................................................................................5 WaterTreatment............................................................................................................................................ 5 WaterStorage.................................................................................................................................................6 Water Transmission & Distribution............................................................................................................6 Sewer Collection,Treatment & Disposal...................................................................................................6 Total Order of Magnitude Utility Development Costs..........................................................................7 TsunamiCenter Site Potential...........................................................................................7 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT.............................................................................................................8 Overview............................................................................................................................... 8 ConceptDesign....................................................................................................................8 FEASIBILITY SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................9 ATTACHMENTS I. SMIC Bench Subdivision Concept 2. SMIC Bench Concept Roadway Alignments R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 118 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 INTRODUCTION The City of Seward is exploring development opportu- nities for its vacant land to meet community needs and advance their vision and goals. Part of their land inventory includes an 1,828-acre parcel on the east side of resurrec- tion Bay near the Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Fourth of July Creek and its tributaries created a natural northern and southern divide of the parcel.The northern portion of the parcel has been identified as a potential development opportunity and the City of Seward has authorized R&M Consultants, Inc. to assess its feasibility. The following feasibility study provides an overview of the SMIC Bench property being considered for development, identifies opportunities and constraints of the site, and presents development concepts based on the goals of the project and municipal code requirements. Conclusions and recommendations made in this study are based on desk- top analysis conducted by certified surveyors, engineers and planners and are considered conceptual. EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERVIEW The City of Seward is considering the development fea- sibility of the portion of the SMIC Bench property gen- erally adjacent to Nash Road, north of the Spring Creek Correctional Center, and west of Godwin Creek. Physical constraints including steep slopes and the presence of in- termittent or permanent streams are driving the feasibility study area boundary (see cover image). Parcel ID 14532003 Legal Description Tract G, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision No. 2, according to Plat No. 98-04, Seward Recording Dis- trict,Alaska. Located within T I S R I E& I W SEC 7, 8, 17, 18, 12, & 13 Physical Address 700 Nash Road Size of Study Area 833 acres, approximately (full parcel is 1,828 acres) Zoning Resource Management — partially developable lands subject to floodplains and steep slopes. Land Use Vacant land that is anecdotally used for recreation (recreation occurs north of the SMIC Bench parcel on USDA Forest Service land for the Godwin Gla- cier Overlook trail). Utilities Utilities do not extend into SMIC Bench area. Water and sewer lines exist within a closed system between the SMIC harbor and prison facilities; no sewer lines are present on Nash Road, however, city water is available at the base of the mountain. Overhead electric lines are present along Nash Road adjacent to the SMIC Bench study area, and underground lines are present on the Spring Creek Correctional Center property. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 h g CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS LAND USE & ZONING Intended Land Use The City of Seward is experiencing an ongoing housing shortage for seasonal and year-round residents and it is a priority of the Community Development Department and City Council to identify areas for residential development. SMIC Bench is being considered as a potential develop- ment site for a new residential neighborhood. Depending on the feasibility of development and antic- ipated housing units, additional public or commercial land uses could be desirable or needed within the SMIC Bench area. Non-residential uses may include parks and recreation, a school or other institutional land uses, home occupation or other small commercial or office uses, restaurants or other food establishments. A school site has been included in the subdivision concept (see Attach- ment I, SMIC Bench Subdivision Concept) which could also be used for a tsunami evacuation area. Access for recreation is anticipated to accompany any development of SMIC Bench, as public lands are adjacent to the City' property and the topography, viewsheds and environment make it highly attractive for year-round recreational pursuits. If access up the mountain to the bench can be established, the topography and amount of available city -owned land would be supportive of a trail network. Development of a trail system should take into consideration access and parking, wayfinding, maintenance, management, intended uses and sustainable design and construction of trails. Establishment of a recreational trail system could increase the attractiveness and marketability of housing developments at SMIC Bench and provide a new destination to be enjoyed by Seward residents. Zoning Zoning districts create the framework for regulating land use within the City of Seward. Each zoning districts has allowable land uses and associated development require- ments. SMIC Bench is zoned Resource Management (RM) commercial, residential, industrial or public uses; and other possible environmental considerations. To effectively support the desired development at SMIC Bench, rezoning the area to one or more of the following zoning districts may be considered based on the City's desired use and intensity of the land: Rural residential district (RR),Intended to provide for stable, quiet, low density (one or two dwelling units per acre) detached single-family residential development, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district including recreational, religious and educational facilities of an appropriate scale and design complementary to the neighbor- hood character. Single-family residential district (R 1) Intended to provide for stable and quiet low to medium density (one to five dwelling units per acre) detached, sin- gle-family residential development, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district. Two-family residential district (R2).Medium density (one to seven dwelling units per acre) transitional housing area with a mix of single and two-family units, free from other uses except those which are both compatible and convenient to residents of such a district. 4. Multi -family residential district (R3 Intended to provide opportunities for a higher density residen- tial setting with a mix of housing units which are predominately multi -family units close to concen- trations of public services, employment and/or recreation.This district may provide a transition between more intensive districts and lower density residential areas if sufficient screening and design features are provided to protect multi -family resi- dences from undesirable effects. Resource Management — Considered principally public 5. Urban residential district (UR),Intended to allow an The RM district is defined by City of Seward Code area of higher density mixed residential uses from Title 15.05.025(b). as lands which are generally detached single-family housing to multi -family apart - undeveloped and cannot be precisely zoned due to ments in conjunction with compatible low impact inadequate information on the extent of public ser- professional office uses in the area surrounding the vices and utilities; the suitability of the land to support downtown business district. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 40 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 Residential development has been identified as the primary land use for a SMIC Bench development to address the identified need for additional housing units.The preferred residential density (units per lot, lots per acre, etc.) will be determined by market preferences and the anticipated availability and costs of utilities, roadways and lot develop- ment.The following tables summarizes potential land uses allowed in applicable zoning districts. Table I. Summary of Residential Land Uses by Zoning District, per City of Seward Code 15.10.226 RM RR RI R2 R3 UR Apartment, efficiency or accessory Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Apartment, studio Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Attached single-family townhouse, row Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Condominium Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Detached single-family Conditional Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Group Home Conditional Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Guest House Conditional Permitted Permitted Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Two-family or duplex Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Multi -family (3 or more) Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Table 2. Summary of Non -Residential Land Uses by Zoning District, per City of Seward Code 15.10.226 • RM RR RI R2 R3 UR Grocery, convenience store Prohibited Permitted Prohibited Prohibited Conditional Conditional Home occupation Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Home rental on a nightly basis Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Admin. Admin. Lodging, B&B, rooms, duplex and acces- sory apartment Prohibited Permitted/ admin Permitted/ admin Permitted/ admin Permitted/ admin Permitted/ admin Lodging, multifamily dwelling apartment Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Office, home professional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Planning Unit Development Prohibited Prohibited Permitted Permitted Permitted Prohibited Playground, public tot lot Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Restaurant, food service, catering, brew pub Conditional Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited School, public/private elementary/sec- ondary Prohibited Conditional Conditional Conditional Conditional Conditional Wind Energy Conservation System Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Development Requirements City of Seward Land Use Code,Title 15, defines dimen- sional standards by zoning district that limit the range of possible subdivision configurations. Table 3 on the follow- ing page provides the dimensional standards required by zoning district: *Note 2E. Multiple -family developments (except studio apartments) with three or more units require a minimum of 9,000 SF in the R3, UR, OR Districts and 20,000 SF in the RM District *Note 2F. Two -Family or duplex developments require a minimum of 6,000 SF in the R2, R3, UR, OR,AC and CB Districts and 20,000 SF in the RM District. Duplex developments within the Federal Addition Subdivision require 5,000 SF.AII other development requirements of this chapter shall be met. *Note 2G. Multiple -Family, studio apartments in the OR, AC, CB, HC, I and RM districts require a minimum of 9,000 SF. The total square footage required for lot setbacks shall be reserved as open area.All other requirements set forth in this chapter shall be met. Required Public Improvements City of Seward Subdivision Code,Title 16 identified required public improvements that must meet identified minimum standards for a subdivision to be approved by the City. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 141 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 Table 3. Summary of City of Seward Code Table 15.10.222 Development Requirements NON-RESIDENTIAL IL RM RR RI & R2 R3 UR Maximum Building Height (ft.) 34 34 34 34 34 Minimum Buildable Lot Size (ft.) *Note 23, 2.E, 2.F. 20,000 20,000 Varies 3,000 to 7,000 Varies 3,000 to 9,000 Varies 3,000 to 9,000 Minimum Lot Width (ft.) 100 100 Varies 30 to 60 Varies 30 to 90 Varies 30 to 90 Minimum FrontYard Setback (ft.) 20 20 20 20 20 Minimum Side Yard Setback (ft.) 10 10 5 min. each side with 15 total 10 5 Minimum Side Yard Setback Adjacent to Street (ft.) 20 10 10 10 10 Minimum RearYard Setback (ft.) 10 10 10 10 10 Maximum Accessory Building Height (ft.) 34 20 20 20 20 Maximum Lot Coverage (%) *Note 2G 100 30 35 40 40 *See Notes on previous page. 16.05.010 Required Public Improvements: I . Streets: minimum requirements are a 50' width and gravel surface. 2. Telephone and electric lines: must be underground. 3. Water system: the subdivider shall provide the water system in accordance with the specifications established by the city planning and zoning commis- sion and affirmed by the city council. Fire hydrants shall be provided to standards established by the American Waterworks Association and shall be a brand specified by the city.The subdivider shall not be required to drill individual wells. 4. Sewer system:Where the city sewer system will service the area covered by the plat or proposed plat, the subdivider shall provide the sewer system in compliance with all applicable state and federal health and environmental laws and regulations. 5. Street lighting: Street lighting shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the city. In addition to the City of Seward Code, minimum stan- dards contained in the Kenai Peninsula Borough Code under Title 20 must be met. Some requirements are more stringent in the KPB Code, and any deviation from the code requires a waiver. GEOTECH Based on the review of available geotechnical reports' geologic maps2, and LIDAR data 3, the surficial geology of the subject site is expected to consist of thin soil de- posits overlying bedrock.The thickness of soil deposits is expected to be generally less than 5 feet, and exposed bedrock is likely present in many areas, particularly on the steeper slopes. In flat areas bog deposits are expect- ed consisting of saturated organic material and perched groundwater.The bedrock is mapped as the Valdez Group, composed of interlayered sandstone and phyllite.Actual bore holes have not been drilled on site to confirm the information gathered from existing sources. Landslide risk at the subject site is considered low due to the thin soil and lack of evidence of past landslide activity. Excavations for road construction and site development are likely to encounter bedrock and may require blasting. The subject site is not expected to be suitable for con- ventional on -site wastewater disposal. ACCESS The current access to the SMIC Bench area is via Nash Road, a paved road that extends around the east side of the bay and into Seward.There are currently no roads that access the SMIC Bench area and this feasibility study addresses the various issues and costs associated with constructing an access road up the mountain. Two primary constraints have been identified for devel- opment in this area: the steepness of the terrain and the presence of shallow bedrock.The slopes adjacent to Nash Road vary, but are consistently over 30 percent, with many areas up to 80 percent.The Kenai Peninsula Bor- ough Code Title 14 Streets and Sidewalks, Roads and Trails 1 R&M consultants, Inc., Nash Road Extension Geologic Evaluation, November 1980. 2 Tysdal, R.G., and Case, J.E., Geologic Map of the Seward and Blying Sound Quadrangles, Alaska, USGS Map 1-1150, 1979. 3 https://gis.kpb.us/map/index.html?viewer=terrain R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 112 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 Chapter 14.06 Road Standards identifies the following construction requirements for roadways: 14.06.160 Road Construction Standards —Alignments: A. Vertical alignment. Roads shall be constructed in a manner such that grades shall not exceed, at any point, six percent on arterial roads and ten percent on all other roads, and no more than four percent within 100 ft. of any intersection. We have assumed that the access road to SMIC Bench would not be an arterial road and can be constructed to a maximum of ten percent.Two potential alignments con- necting Nash Road with the SMIC Bench have been iden- tified (see Attachment 2, SMIC Bench Concept Roadway Alignments).The main access alignment recommended accesses the northern portion of the developable bench area.The alignment switches back to maintain the ten per- cent requirements and is approximately 6,000 feet long. Because of the slopes along this alignment, no new lots can be created along the alignment until the top of SMIC Bench is reached. Secondary access would be provided via a 7,600-foot-long road originating at Nash Road and extending to the southern portion of the development. The road is designed to fit completely within the existing City of Seward tract so that no additional agreements are required with other property owners to build and maintain the road. The second impediment to construction is the shallow bedrock. Bedrock is good for stability, and dramatically decreases the chances of landslides, however, it increases the cost of road and site construction because it needs to be blasted rather than dug. It also precludes the use of traditional on -site sewer and water system that make the development of individual lots simpler and cheaper (see Utilities section below). Steep slopes and shallow bedrock add significant costs to road and utility construction for the project. UTILITIES Providing public water and sewer to homes on the SMIC bench requires construction of significant infrastructure relative to the number of parcels being served.This sec- tion evaluates utility requirements in concept, including how improvements can be constructed in phases while supporting the future full build -out. Water Source The SMIC Bench development depends on the develop- ment of a water source with adequate quality and capacity. Based on the desktop geotechnical assessment of the bench study area, the high bedrock makes well develop- ment expensive. Depending on source aquifer hydrology, groundwater production, and water quality, wells on the bench may be entirely infeasible.The following solutions for providing the SMIC bench with water were considered: I. Develop additional high production capacity public groundwater well(s) near existing city wells. Poten- tial impacts to existing groundwater wells served by shared aquifer would need to be evaluated further. Develop high -capacity public groundwater well(s) on bench — capacity and water quality are likely not adequate due to shallow bedrock and lack of water producing aquifers in bedrock. If a water source on the bench were deemed viable, it could be more cost efficient, depending on the well depth required through bedrock.This should be confirmed by geo- technical or hydrologic study. 3. Develop private groundwater wells on individual parcels.These are subject to the same challenges listed in #2 above. 4. Develop a surface water impoundment and water intake structure in nearby creek — not likely to be viable and will be influenced by climate conditions. This would require a new WTP be constructed on the SMIC bench. Booster pumps may also be required for source water transmission/distribution. Connect to existing city water distribution net- work located at the bottom of the mountain south of Nash Road.This option requires constructing pumping stations to pump the water up the moun- tain, and large storage facilities on the SMIC Bench to store the water once on site. WaterTreatment The existing water treatment plant (WTP) located near the correctional center serves a limited number of city customers in the area.The WTP will require expansion, modernization, and improvements to support the addi- tional water demand presented by the SMIC bench.The WTP should be improved to increase output capacity and meet current water treatment regulatory requirements. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 43 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 The existing WTP should be further evaluated for its condition and suitability for expansion, improvement, or replacement. Water Storage Water storage tank(s) (WST) would likely need to be provided for the SMIC Bench development to serve antic- ipated community peak demands, emergency storage, and fire flows for the area.The tanks should be placed at an elevation which the system can provide minimum pres- sures to higher elevation homes.This may require dedi- cated access and a WST site higher than the development, approximate elevation of 1,200'. Water use and storage requirements are estimated based on the following design criteria: a. 3-bedroom residential homes b. 100 gal/capita/day c. School/commercial daily use (35k gpd) d. 3 days emergency storage. The water storage tank site can be developed to support the phased development.A smaller 0.5 million -gallon (mGal) tank will be constructed for Phase 1,with future expansion area reserved for the full build -out 1.5 mGal water storage tank. Water Transmission & Distribution Water must be supplied to the SMIC bench develop- ment to fill the WST and provide distribution system pressures.To supply treated water from the source well/ WTP (elevation 100'+) to the bench/WST (elevation 1,200+), a series of booster stations supplying high-pres- sure transmission mains would be required.The booster pumps could be vault style or in above -grade structures.A high-pressure transmission main would be constructed. The SMIC Bench development parcel elevations range from approximately 700' to 1,050' which will likely re- quire two or more hydraulic pressure zones managed by city pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations to maintain service pressures within the pressure range allowable by Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) and the city code utility tariffs. Alternatively, homes could be supplied with in - home PRVs or booster pumps, but limitations exist due to the elevation differences.The following improvements will be required: 1. Booster Station and high-pressure transmission main from source wells/WTP to bench WST. 2. Intermediate booster stations for water transmis- sion to SMIC bench along access road. 3. Pressure reducing valve stations to manage service pressures throughout bench development. Sewer Collection, Treatment & Disposal Due to the number of parcels, their density, topography, and size of the proposed parcels, on -site septic systems are not practical or suitable for wastewater disposal. On site -treatment and disposal for each lot is limited by the presence of groundwater, topography, and geotechnical conditions and must comply with minimum separation distances. Installation per lot would be approximately $30,000, and ongoing electricity and maintenance costs will be incurred by individual private property own- ers.Advanced on -site treatment systems (Advantex or similar) for individual parcels could be considered as an interim solution but these are not the most cost-effective design for the full SMIC build -out. A public sewer collection system maintained and op- erated by the city is recommended. Sewage would be collected at a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The WWTF would provide for the secondary treatment of wastewater via mechanical processes. Final effluent disposal discharge quality parameters and wastewater effluent discharge receiving waters should be evaluated further. AWWTP requires active and ongoing facility management and maintenance including sludge disposal, electricity costs, replacement and servicing of parts, and presents additional energy costs to the city. Another alternative to the WWTP was considered.This alternative would pipe wastewater down the hill and discharge into the existing city sewer Iagoon.The lagoon would require expansion approximately doubling its foot- print, and associated improvements/upgrades. Due to the high-pressure sewer mains, wastewater pressure reducing stations are required. In -line hydro turbines could be con- sidered to recapture potential energy, generate electricity, and supply power to the grid offsetting energy consump- tion by the booster stations. The improvements presented carry additional O&M costs and responsibility for the city public works department. The concept design goals and assumptions are subject to change as the site is investigated further and the project evolves. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 1§4 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 Table 4. Full Build -Out Utility Expansion Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate EXPANSIONSMIC BENCH FEASIBILITY STUDY — UTILITY ORDER OF • FULL BUILD -OUT The cost estimate is a preliminary concept order of magnitude level of completion only. Estimator's contingency is intended to cover engineering and construction requirements not readily apparent at the concept level of evaluation, inflation, and escalation of construction costs. WORK DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST COST Water Source,Treatment, Storage, Distribution Water Source Well Development Lump Sum 1 $250,000 $250,000 WaterTreatment Plant Lump Sum 1 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Treated Water Storage Tank Gallons 1,500,000 $4 $5,250,000 Water Booster Station Each 3 $1,000,000 $3,000,000 Water Transmission Mains Linear Foot 8,500 $325 $2,762,500 Water Distribution Mains Linear Foot 19,000 $250 $4,750,000 Pressure Reducing Valve Station Each 2 $450,000 $900,000 Subtotal Water $21,912,500 Sewer Collection and Treatment Gravity Sewer Collection System Linear Foot 19,000 $275 $5,225,000 Wastewater Treatment Facility Lump Sum 1 $16,000,000 $16,000,000 Subtotal Sewer $21,225,000 Electrical Service and Communications Electric and Communications Service (Verify with Electric Utility) Estimator's Contingency (25%) $10,784,375 Total order of 9400��� �i Electric and Communications Overhead electric is present along Nash Road adjacent to the SMIC Bench study area. Its capacity, condition, and suitability for serving the full build -out of the SMIC bench is unknown. Roadway lighting and other amenities on the SMIC bench may be considered.The City power utility is expected to provide conceptual costs and designs to provide electrical and communications service to the SMIC bench. Total Order of Magnitude Utility Development Costs Table 4 above summarizes an order of magnitude cost estimate for providing water and sewer service to 750 parcels in the SMIC Bench "full build-out".The order of magnitude cost estimates should be updated as design assumptions evolve, and more information becomes avail- able.Annual O&M and energy costs for operation of the water and sewer facilities are not included in this estimate and should be considered in a net present worth evalua- tion of project feasibility. TSUNAMI CENTER SITE POTENTIAL The City of Seward is within a tsunami hazard zone. Currently there is no tsunami refuge location east of the Seward Hwy, resulting in people at the correctional center, SMIC harbor area, and residential neighborhoods accessed via Nash Road having to travel to the Seward Hwy and north to evacuate. If a significant earthquake event were to compromise the bridge on Nash Road, access to the Seward Hwy would not be possible.The SMIC Bench study area is at an elevation above the areas of potential impact for tsunami events and therefore pres- ents an opportunity for a tsunami refuge location. Prelim- inary research to identify grant funding opportunities to mitigate this hazard revealed that new road construction intended to facilitate emergency evacuation was not an eligible use of funding through the existing hazard mitiga- tion programs. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 1h CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OVERVIEW The concept design shown in this report is a portion of Tract G, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, Number 2, according to Plat No. 98-04, Seward Recording District, Alaska. Contours were obtained from publicly available LiDAR data from the Kenai Peninsula Borough GIS.The terrain within Tract G is very steep, which makes con- struction of an access road up the mountain to reach the SMIC Bench challenging. In addition, the Kenai Peninsula Borough (KPB) code stipulates, in 14.06.080 — Road Construction Standards -Construction categories, that a road that serves greater than 50 lots is designated as a Category IV road and cannot exceed 10% slope. Design concepts are based on all rights of way being 60 feet wide, with road slopes at, or less than, a 10% slope. In addition to the steep slopes, the soils in the area are shallow, and most of the site is expected to be near -sur- face bedrock.This means that all road construction will include a fair amount of blasting, which increases the overall construction costs.The north access road that connects the proposed subdivision with Nash Road will need to be approximately 6,000 feet long, with switch backs to accommodate the slope Iimits.A secondary access road will need to be constructed to meet second- ary access requirements for subdivisions over 30 Iots.The estimated cost of the road construction from Nash Road to the beginning of the proposed subdivision is $2,000 per linear feet of road.This does not include water and sewer but does include ditches and lighting. Individual lot development is also limited by steep slopes. In general, slopes up to 20% are developable, but slopes between 20% and 30% require additional effort and mon- ey to develop. Slopes over 30% require specialty measures to develop.The concept lots shown attempt to keep the slopes within individual lots at 20% or less, however, some lots are in slopes that exceed this due to necessity. Lot development is also hampered by the near -surface bedrock.This site condition inhibits the use of on -site sewer and water. Instead, the water will need to be pumped up the hill and stored in tanks at the top.A spe- cialized sewer treatment system will also be required as typical leach fields do not work in bedrock. CONCEPT DESIGN The concept design features lots with a minimum area of 10,500 square feet.This size accommodates City of Seward code requirements for single family, duplexes, and multi -family houses. In general, for this type of terrain, more lots are needed to offset the high costs of road and utility construction.This design creates approximately 674 lots and requires approximately 32,625 feet of local roads for access within the proposed subdivision.The cost of road construction is expected to be less than the main access road at $1,000 per linear foot but will still require blasting and on -site gravel production. Another feature of this design is a 12-acre parcel that can be used for development of aTsunami Evacuation Area, parking for recreational trails, and potentially as an elementary school site in the future.Ten-foot-wide rights of way are also dedicated throughout the proposed subdivision to allow foot and bicycle traffic to access the 12-acre site without having to traverse completely around the subdivision using bike paths along the roads.These corridors would also create more direct access to other trails that might be developed on the hillside around the subdivision. See attached SMIC Bench Concept. The main barrier to achieving a concept design that financially breaks even or makes a profit is the cost of the road and utility construction.Within any given subdivision design, the lots along a section of the subdivision road that serves those lots must pay for itself at a minimum. The construction will include the road itself, ditches, bike paths, lighting, and underground electric, communication, and gas Iines.These features are considered when gen- erating a construction cost for a linear foot of road.This makes the equation simpler when comparing costs of construction to the market value of each lot created.At a minimum, the creation of a group of lots, served by a road corridor that includes all utilities and drainage, would pay for itself when the lots are sold. If the road costs are more than other areas within a given market, the market value of the lots must also increase proportionally, and it becomes a question of what the market will bear regard- ing the appeal of the lots. The concept design requires two access roads that begin at Nash Road, and extend to the top of the SMIC Bench. Because of the steep slopes between the road and the bench, there can be no lot development until the top is R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 1§6 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 reached. Therefore, there is no offsetting lot sales available to pay for the construction of the 13,600 feet of road construction.The estimated cost of this road construc- tion is $27.41 OM, which does not include the water and sewer costs.The interior subdivision roads on top of the bench are expected to cost $32.6M, bringing the total roads costs to $60M.Water, sewer, electric, and commu- nication line costs for the entire 674 lot development is expected to be approximately $54M, driving costs upward to above $ I OOM. Table 5. Estimated Concept Development Cost Summary. There are contingencies associated with each construc- tion estimate. For example, the utilities estimate has a 25% contingency that adds $10.78M to the final cost; the utility estimate is based on 750 housing units to account for two or multi -family units on some of the proposed lots and ensure the water and wastewater systems would be right -sized for the potential development. Final con- struction costs could potentially be lower depending on actual conditions within the site, lowering the breakeven individual lot value. INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED ESTIMATED COST FOR FULL INCLUDED CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT• Road Construction from Nash Rd.to Bench $27.41 million 20% ($5.48 million) Interior Subdivision Roads $32.6 million 20% ($6.52 million) Water, Sewer, Electric, Communication Lines $54 million 25% ($10.78 million) Total Estimated Development Cost $1 14 million 20% ($22.78 Million) Price per Lot to break even on development costs (total $169,155 costs/674 lots) FEASIBILITY SUMMARY The SMIC Bench provides a large, buildable space to ex- pand housing for the City of Seward.The crux of develop- ment is constructing access roads up the steep slopes to the bench and bringing utilities to the site.The expecta- tion that the entire site is shallow bedrock also increases the costs of development. Roads and ditches would need to be blasted, and gravel crushed on -site for use as a leveling course.The bedrock also eliminates the option of on -site sewer and water for each lot. Instead, the water must be pumped up the hill, or a community well would need to be established at the top of the bench. In either case, a water storage system would also be required. On - site sewage systems would not be viable, so a treatment system would need to be constructed that would meet the needs of the entire community. Estimated costs for creating these systems is included in Tables 4 and 5. Utility Expansion Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate. The last consideration is the cost to maintain the im- provements. Roads must be plowed. Sewage systems must be maintained.Water pumps and storage facilities require maintenance.With a subdivision such as this, it is impera- tive that the access road be maintained in a usable state. Any disruption caused by landslides, avalanches, earth- quakes, or even on -going maintenance, would disrupt the entire community that resides in the subdivision. The SMIC Bench site is one of the only large areas in Seward that can add a meaningful amount of housing in- ventory for the city. Once the site is accessed, the bench offers over 240 acres of space to develop individual lots, a tsunami evacuation area, a potential school site, and access to millions of acres of public recreational Iand.The views from the bench would undoubtedly be stunning on a clear day, adding value to the created lots, and making the subdivision one of the more desirable ones in the city. For a subdivision of this size, a phased approach works best to avoid incurring the costs of constructing the entire subdivision prior to selling a single Iot.A connec- tion will need to be made between the north and south access roads to provide alternate access for the created Iots.This connection would naturally fall along the south and west edges of the subdivision, which feature lots likely to have the greatest appeal and views.The southern and western lots would be expected to have a higher value once access and utilities are provided, and construction costs could be recovered more quickly than lots on the R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 127 CITY OF SEWARD SMIC BENCH DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 2022 interior. After dual access is constructed, the rest of the subdivision could be developed as needed, and as more funding becomes available. An additional benefit of phasing the development is that the SMIC Bench area becomes available sooner to the community at large for recreational purposes. Once on the bench, multi -use trails can be established and be incorporated into future phased development.Trails built to accommodate a multitude of non -motorized recre- ational uses, including cross-country skiing in the winter and mountain biking in the summer, could crisscross the bench resulting in trails with breathtaking mountain views on one side and panoramic views of Resurrection Bay on the other. Local hiking trails might be built to connect with established ridge trails to provide further access to millions of acres of recreational public land and scenic vistas.The Bench Community, if constructed thoughtfully, could satisfy the need for housing while creating miles of recreational opportunities for the citizens of Seward. The SMIC Bench subdivision has been designed to sup- port a potential mix of zoning and housing development types including single family homes, single family with accessory dwelling units, duplexes, and multifamily devel- opments to provide for significant and flexible housing unit expansion.The opportunities offered through the development of SMIC Bench are feasible and could help meet multiple high priority needs of the community and achieve identified goals of the City of Seward.The cities' Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan both encourage development of new housing, and the city and borough code support the proposed concept plan.The citizens of Seward are united in their love for the city and the outdoor space that surrounds it, but also understand that the city needs housing for people that live and work in the city year-round.This subdivision addresses the com- munity's needs and values by creating housing opportuni- ties surrounded by expansive nature, featuring panoramic views, and providing access to recreational opportunities otherwise available to so few. R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. 1A \\�\\I \l`\ +tea �,. LIIrza u rzrz. H L- i b rzo 12-PCRE SCHOOL I z TRACTq J z,a zas zs z, za y r sry +wno n•^ � z. e TSUNAhII CENTER SITE L6 _ z z o ,o ego , a s i rz ,o .a +,.an +rcan zr � zrzs zrzz au �� \ zx zw / ze Lacy /'�-�Roeoseo +�,.� rasss reono� 129 N,7TE$ UP& al CONCEPT DESIGN PROPOSED SMIC BENCH SUBDIVISION n°tso�i Su a iso�igs z assm <o' —4 1111osnoirzorz I� Port & Commerce Advisory Board 2022 GOALS CALENDAR DATE TOPICS Resolution: Approve PACAB Priorities Resolution: Adopt SMIC Development Plan updates (from Dec 1) Jan 5 Meeting Discuss having a job fair (from Dec 1) Review LP sewage lagoon engineer report (from Dec 1) Vote on Chair and Vice Chair to expire July, 2022 Zoom or remote attendance Invite Chamber of Commerce to collaborate on reducing/eliminating barriers to doing business in Seward Jan 19 WS Review definitions for J-1 and H213 visas; discuss status of getting workers to Seward Presentation from Tara Riemer on the hiring difficulties they face at their business Feb 2 Meeting Presentation from Nicole Lawrence on the difficulties they face at their business Fisheries issues, including international vs. local, halibut by catch Feb 16 WS Presentation by PND re: Harbor wash down pad Presentation from Cathy LeCom to on the difficulties they face at their business Mar 2 Meeting Provide input on the CIP plan for the 2023/2024 budget Presentation from Jena Petersen on the difficulties they face at their business Mar 16 WS Review vessel property tax Review and u date Harbor Tariff Mar 28 Joint WS w/council Review PACAB Priorities & Goals at 5:30 p.m. Apr 6 Meeting Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (APDES) Program — wastewater discharge plan Apr 20 WS Overall discussion on SMIC area -wide development May 4 Meeting May 18 WS Discuss labor shortage issues; identify potential legislative issues Education/hos itali /childcare Jun -Aug Hiatus Sep 7 Meeting Sep 21 WS Invite renewable energy users to share their experiences Oct 5 Meeting Decide who will attend the AML Conference in Anchorage in November Climate Action Plan Oct 19 WS Review Harbor Plan 131 Port & Commerce Advisory Board 2022 GOALS CALENDAR Nov 2 Meeting Provide recommendations to the board of Fisheries Nov 16 WS Annual update of the SMIC Development Plan Dec 7 Meeting Dec 21 WS PACAB Priorities for 2023 OTHER ITEMS TO BE SCHEDULED (or updated) Invite Alutiiq Hatchery to make presentation about ocean acidification and hypoxia Whittier cruise ship project AKRR contractor announcement for new terminal 132 PORT & COMMERCE ADVISORY BOARD (PACAB) 2022 PRIORITIES & GOALS Following are the Priorities & Goals for PACAB, as approved by PACAB (Res 22-001) and City Council (Res 22-009): PRIORITIES • Support harbor operations and harbor users • Help lead Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) development • Advise and support the Seward Chamber of Commerce in their marketing role for the city • Explore and promote energy alternatives and community sustainability practices + Support actions and legislation that promote the viability of all businesses • Promote quality of life for Seward residents • Monitor and provide recommendations to Council regarding all fisheries issues impacting our community SHORT TERM GOALS • Solicit data, input, and comments for recommendation to solve problems with employee recruitment and retention • Prioritize the City's legislative priorities for port and commerce initiatives • Conduct an annual review of vessel property tax and provide recommendation to Council; consider flat rates • Review the Harbor Tariff • Promote energy education and communication between the City and its residents • Track and evaluate the progress of the Interconnect Policy, Heat Pump Rebate and other energy -related issues • Hold a joint work session with the Planning & Zoning Commission about a SMIC overlay • Review the SMIC Development Plan • Track progress and make recommendations related to ongoing development at SMIC • Update Seward Boat Harbor Plan • Provide input on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) • Submit a Climate Action Plan to Council for adoption • Monitor and provide recommendations to Council regarding all fisheries issues impacting our community • Send a board member to the Alaska Municipal League Conference + Discuss water and wastewater infrastructure and its ability to support economic growth, and evaluate environmental impacts • Participate in a joint work session with Historic Preservation Commission on Downtown Historic Overlay District LONG TERM GOALS • Update SMIC Development Plan • Support renewable and alternative energy sources; identify barriers to adoption and provide solutions • Promote open air and other meeting venues for public gatherings 133 September 2022 October 2022 September 2022 SuThMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 910 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Aug 28 29 30 31 Sep 1 2 3 1:00pm PACAB Ad Hoc Committee Meeting @ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12:00 PACAB 6:00pm HPC 6:00pm P&Z Work Session Work Session (Meeting - (Council Cancelled) 7:00pm HPC (Review Municial Regular EEZ.and Meeting... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 5:30pm CC Spc 1:00pm PACAB Mtg Ad Hoc (2023/2024 Committee Meeting @ m CC Mtg 7::(C ouncil 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6:00pm P&Z Work Session (Council 25 27 28 29 30 Oct 1 m CC Spc 1:00pm PACAB (SMIC Ad Hoc ch Committee sibility Study) (7:00pm Meeting @ --library- CC Mtg a.m.b.er. Council Calendar 1 8/31/2022 11:23 AM 134 October 2022 November 2022 October 2022 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Sep 25 26 27 28 29 30 Oct 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ELECTION DAY 7 12:00pm PACAB 1:00pm Canvass am - 8 pm Board (Council (Council Chambers - Open to 9 10 11 12 3 14 15 7:00pm CC Mtg 7:OOpm P&Z :OOpm PACAB (Council Ad Hoc :00pm HPC [7:00�m HPC ul.ar................................. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 HOLIDAY 9:00am CC Work Session (Proposed L5:30pmCC Changesto Seward City Code as part ofthe 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 5:30pm CC 5:30pm CC 1:00pm PACAB Special Mtg Special Mtg Ad Hoc (COTW (COTW Committee 2023/2024 /2024 Meeting @ -Budge. 6:00pm Librace 7:06pm CC �tgfl Cancelled 30 31 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 Council Calendar 2 8/31/2022 11:23 AM 135 November 2022 December 2022 November 2022 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 910 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Oct 30 31 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 rt=Z] PACAB mg- 6pm 7 8 9 11 12 ELECTION DAY 7 0pm PACAB HOLIDAY am - 8 pm Ad Hoc (Council HPC (7.6opm Work Session C.o..u.n.c.i.l. .............. HPC� 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 7:00pm CC Mtg 6:OOpm P&Z (Council Work Session (Council 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5:30pm CC 1:00pm PACAB Special Mtg (COTW Ad Hoc 2023/2024 Committee g.et) Meeting @ 27 28 29 30 Dec 2 3 5:30pm CC Special Mtg (CoTW 2023/2024 udget 7:00pm CC Mtg a.m.b.er. Council Calendar 3 8/31/2022 11:23 AM 136