Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08262019 City Council Laydown - Kaluza Letter on PACAB RECEIVED Philip Kaluza AUG 22 2019 PO Box 3234 Seward, AK 99664 8/22/2019 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO: Christy Terry, Chair & PACAB members: Re: PACAB Resolution 2019-003 (Alternative Energy Interconnect Policy) It has come to my attention the PACAB Resolution 2019-003 approved this spring is being reconsidered per the request of the utility manager. Once again the can gets kicked down the road. A brief history: I began my approval process over a year ago. The interconnect policy roadblocks became clear and well defined, both from a technical and financial aspect. There was no reason to complete an application for an interconnect that was essentially impossible to meet. To my knowledge no one in Seward has been able to successfully navigate our city electric utility minefield of the unique interconnect requirements for a simple solar rooftop system. I know of one homeowner that has been trying for 4 years. A year ago the utility manager stated he would work on revising the interconnect policy over the winter. This spring arrived, nada. Just BS. With a little persuasion, I was able to get the City Council to request the PACAB review the policy and make a recommendation. That task was accomplished in relatively short order and I believe corrected the insurmountable roadblocks intentionally laid to dissuade any such systems from coming on line. Unfortunately, the utility manager apparently convinced PACAB he was in the process of having an engineering review done to assure the changes were not detrimental to the city electric utility. The PACAB recommendation to the City Council was delayed till this fall to allow for this review. Another kick of the can. Now, it is my understanding the utility manager never did proceed with any engineering review. Claiming nearly out of work engineering firms in Alaska were too busy to address the issue in a timely manner. A summer of solar was essentially wasted as my panels remain in my shed. One thousand pounds of CO2 emissions could have been avoided with my solar panels. Not huge, but certainly a step in the right direction. Instead the utility manager now recommends a revised resolution that would remove one obstacle but leave the other. You may have seen that beat up can roll down your street. It was nice he provided the PACAB members an example of a piece of hardware that would meet the manual reconnect requirements. Of course I asked for that piece of information over a year ago, with nothing more than a shrug in response. I'm not sure that particular switch would work on my system, nor does the wiring diagram he provided appear to be for that switch. Had the utility manager provided you with a complete engineer's drawing of a "pre-approved" switch assembly that any general electrician could install we would have had something to work from. I have no idea the cost estimate of that manual reconnect switch hardware properly engineered and installed. Nor any technical explanation of why that switch is even required. Only that Seward is "special". Yes we are special in deed. I have yet to find another utility in Alaska or the country or the world for that matter that requires such equipment for a simple rooftop solar installation. (There are currently millions of photovoltaic (pv) rooftop solar systems in the US operating just fine without it, even real islands like Kodiak manage fine) I doubt the utility manager can provide you a list of utilities with our special requirements but it would be worth asking for. Does the value of that disconnect switch justify increasing the cost of my installation 30% to possibly over 300%? Will the utility require an engineer certify that each switch installation complies with our code? Better double my cost estimate. We have national codes that cover all aspects of rooftop solar systems, though you will find no reference to the switching hardware we require. Regarding the requirement for a dedicated transformer the utility manager suggests the City "suppress the code ordinance" whatever that means. Seems he suggests we ignore the law regarding the transformer but still require the yet to be understood reconnect switch requirement. (Sounds like a little of the "good ole boys club" policy in play.) Why not just get it right? Remember the bottom line of any interconnected system is it WILL be disconnected if it is found to cause a problem. Where's the risk to the utility? My next move: In order to receive the full federal solar tax credit available I will be installing my pv solar system this fall without the interconnect enabled. The system will be installed and inspected to all current electrical code, sans the bogus manual reconnect switch and redundant dedicated transformer. My options are limited. But nothing says I can't winterize my home and turn the power off, including two electric heat pumps and join the snow bird club. Batteries next spring and stay off the grid completely for the summers? Our forests burn and the air is choked with smoke such that I can hardly breathe. Our oceans rising, warming, and acidifying from climate change..... we kick the renewable can down the road. NICE. Respectfully submitted /71a-77' /271 ---'' Phil Kaluza Seward Resident Cc: Seward City Council