HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes2020-052 Sponsored by: Meszaros
Public Hearing: July 13, 2020
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2020-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD,
ALASKA, APPROVING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL REMOVAL, SITE
DEMOLITION, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MEMORIAL AT THE
SITE OF THE JESSE LEE HOME LOCATED AT JESSE LEE
HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, ADDITION NO. 4, LOTS 15A AND 15B,
CITY OF SEWARD
WHEREAS, the City accepted a Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development (DCCED) grant via Resolution 2018-088 in the amount of
$1,073,441.46 to mitigate the Jesse Lee Home structure, to remove, dispose,and abate
environmental hazards remaining on the property,including asbestos,underground fuel and/or
other tanks, buildings, fencing, and structures, and to respectfully remove salvageable wood
and/or property features to build a memorial to the residents and staff of the facility; and
WHEREAS, as stated in Resolution 2018-088, the City's intent was to conduct such
hazardous material removal, site remediation,and memorial construction in the event the
11111 ownership oftheproperty reverted back to the City from Friends of the Jesse Lee Home; and
WHEREAS, the property identified as Lots 15A and 15B, Jesse Lee Home Heights
Subdivision Addition No. 4 according to Plat 89-18 is also known as the Jesse Lee Home; and
WHEREAS, a site visit was conducted in February, 2020 by hazmat consultant
EHS-Alaska, Inc. (Engineering, Health and Safety Services) and Schneider Structural
Engineers; and
WHEREAS, Hazmat Report and Structural Assessment Reports were submitted, along
with solicited budget cost estimates, from abatement contractors and demolition contractors; and
WHEREAS, R & M Consultants presented the consultants' findings to City Council on
June 8,2020:
• Hazard material removal of Home (Refurbish) - Asbestos and lead removal along
with structural shoring for hazmat removal $1,700,000; removal of hazardous
materials only — this doesn't include any restoration to stop further deterioration;
and
• Hazard material removal of Home (Demolition) - Asbestos and lead removal
along with structural shoring for hazmat removal $800,000 to 1,300,000; demo of
buildings and removal of hazardous materials; and
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2020-052
• Building refurbish and Hazard material removal - Asbestos and lead removal
along with structural shoring for hazmat and building refurbish to current code
$27,000,000+ million; removal of hazardous materials and building refurbish, not
including furnishings; and
WHEREAS, for decades, various attempts have been made to restore/save Jesse Lee
Home, but have failed and the two remaining buildings still sit vacant, neglected, and
deteriorated; and
WHEREAS, it is the City's intent to conduct hazardous material removal, site
demolition, and memorial construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that:
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the grant f v►n the State of Alaska in the
amount of$1,073,441.46 to conduct hazanious material tcinoval, site demolition, and constriction of a
memorial at the site of the Jesse Lee Home located at Jesse Lee Heights Sub Addition No.4 Lots 15A and 15B.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to release Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the
removal of hazardous materials,site demolition,and for the construction of a memorial to the residents and
staff of the facility at the site of the Jesse Lee Home using respectfully removed salvageable wood
and/or property features.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this
13th day of July, 2020.
TH CITTO/ SEWARD, ALASKA
/1111:11-1\
Tristy Ter, , ► ayor
AYES: Butts, Baclaan, McClure, Osenga, Terry
NOES: Seese
ABSENT: Crites
ABSTAIN: None
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2020-052
tor
ATTEST:
//
renda J. al o MC
City Clerk
(City Se41j F S •.
SEAL I -
•
.„.. OFF tki" •'
Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: July 13, 2020
To: City Council
Through: Scott Meszaros, City Manage
From: Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development Director
Agenda Item: A Resolution Approving Hazardous Material Removal, Site Demolition, And
Construction of a Memorial at The Site of The Jesse Lee Home Located at Jesse Lee
Heights Subdivision Addition No 4 Lot 15a and 15b City Of Seward
BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION:
For decades various failed attempts have been made to restore/save the Jesse Lee Home,but the two
remaining buildings still sit vacant, neglected and deteriorated
The City was awarded a Department of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development Grant
in the amount of$1,073,441.46 to mitigate the Jesse Lee Home structure, to remove, dispose, and
abate environmental hazards remaining on the property,including asbestos,underground fuel and/
or other tanks,buildings,fencing and structures,and to respectfully remove salvageable wood and/
or property features to build a memorial to the residents and staff of the facility.
Site visits by both hazmat and structural engineer consultants, Schneider and EHS, Alaska were
conducted in February 2020.The City requested a visual assessment of existing structures to identify
any structural deficiencies or safety issues which pose immediate life-health and safety concerns for
the purposes of hazardous material abatement and construction of temporary reinforcements to
structural systems.
Schneider's report stated there was considerable further deterioration of the structure as
compared to the previous structural assessment performed in 2011. That due to the structural
deficiencies observed, it is recommended that no individuals or groups of individuals other than
professional qualified and licensed personnel with expertise and experience be allowed entry to
these structures.
Prior to hazardous material abatement to be conducted, a new temporary shoring and
reinforcement design should be conducted by a licensed professional structural engineering firm
with specific attention to the areas defined for abatement to occur and in coordination with the
abatement plan. A shoring plan and design should be conducted with coordination between
contractor, hazmat cleanup subcontractor and structural engineering sub., so that effective and
efficient work can be achieved with specific attention to life safety.
Once shoring and structural reinforcements are established, hazardous materials abatement could
potentially proceed in either a level-by-level effort or space-by-space format. After hazardous
material removal has been concluded, the structures may be fully evaluated for remediation and
restoration and financial feasibility. At this future point, a comprehensive structural evaluation
can be conducted and specific recommendations for permanent structural retrofit can be
provided.
22
It should be noted that there has already been significant effort put into previous evaluations
structural or otherwise, that maybe drawn upon. However, additional structural damage has
occurred, and will continue to occur since the previous evaluations, causing exacerbation to the
already identified structural deficiencies and causing new unidentified structural damage. The
full report is attached with this agenda statement.
Mr. Robert A. French, P.E. of EHS-Alaska, Inc. (EHS-Alaska) conducted an inspection of
hazardous material assessment the home was surveyed for the presence of asbestos-containing
materials (ACM), and other potentially hazardous materials for the City of Seward. The survey
also provided a"good faith" inspection for hazardous materials that may be disturbed during
future preservation or demolition work. The proposed work would also include the disturbance,
demolition, removal and disposal of lead-containing paints and/or lead-containing materials that
is incidental to the project. The full report is attached with this agenda statement.
On June 8, 2020, R & M Consultants presented to City Council a presentation with background
research,hazardous material assessment,structural assessment and budgetary estimates as follows:
Hazard material removal of Home(refurbish)-Asbestos and lead removal along with structural
shoring for hazmat removal$1,700,000**Rerrroval of hazardous materials only;this doesn't include
an),restoration to stop further deuteratior
Hazard material removal of Home(Demolition)-Asbestos and Iead removal along with structural
shoring for hazmat removal$800,000 to 1,300,000**Demo of buildings and removal of hazardous
materials
Building refurbish and Hazard material removal - Asbestos and lead removal along with
structural shoring for hazmat and building refurbish to current code$27,000,000+million. Removal
of hazardous materials and building refurbish not including furnishings
The City intends to conduct hazardous material removal,site demolition,and memorial construction.
INTENT:
Execute an RFP for remove of hazardous material removal, site demolition, site demolition, and
build a memorial to the residents and staff of the facility using respectfully removed salvageable
wood and/or property features
CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No N/A
Comprehensive Plan (docrnnent source here):2.2.9 Public Safety-
1 innprove the safety of city owned buildings 3.6.LI encourage and X
continue development of walking and bike paths that connect residential
areas to the schools, parks......
2. Strategic Plan (document source here): X
:31. 0ther(list):
23
FISCAL NOTE:
Funding for this project will be spent out of the Jesse Lee Home project fund account
number 80093-0000-7009, and will be reimbursed by the Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development Grant received via Resolution 2018-088.
Approved by Finance Department: k=VeJ 64 5, W0/t-
ATTORNEY REVIEW: Yes No X Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION: Council Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute an
RFP for the Hazardous Material Removal,Site Demolition,And Construction of a Memorial
at The Site of The Jesse Lee Home Located at Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision Addition No 4 Lot
15a And 15b City Of Seward
Resolution 2020-052
Public Hearing
24
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA Sponsored by: Bridges
RESOLUTION 2018-088
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEWARD, ALASKA, APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SEWARD AND THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS FOR A
DESIGNATED LEGISLATIVE GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF$1,073,441.46
FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL REMOVAL, SITE REMEDIATION,AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A MEMORIAL AT THE SITE OF THE JESSE LEE
HOME
WHEREAS, the City of Seward and the Friends of the Jesse Lee Home entered into a
Purchase and Sale Agreement, for the property identified as Lots 15A and 15B, Jesse Lee Home
Heights Subdivision Addition No.4 according to Plat 89-18 also known as the Jesse Lee Home, as
authorized by City of Seward Resolution No. 2014-059; and
WHEREAS, within that purchase and sale agreement there are certain improvements
required during a"due diligence"period which expires August 29,2019. Those improvements are:
a. Hazmat abatement (estimated at $216,000)
b. Extension of 50% of the water utilities: 270 +/- feet 8" main @ 200 per foot and 2
hydrants (estimate at &74,000 X .5 = $37,000)
C. Extension of 50% of the sewer utilities: 220 +/- feet 6" main @ $150 per foot, 100
+/- feet 4"main @ 125 per foot, 3SSMHs @$10,000 each(estimated at$75,000 X
.5 = $37,750)
and;
WHEREAS, in the event these improvements are not completed by August 29, 2019, the
property reverts back to City ownership; and
WHEREAS, the City has been awarded a Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development Grant in the amount of $1,073,441.46 to mitigate the Jesse Lee Home
structure,to remove,dispose,and abate environmental hazards remaining on the property,including
asbestos,underground fuel and/or other tanks,buildings,fencing and structures,and to respectfully
remove salvageable wood and/or property features to build a memorial to the residents and staff of
the facility; and
WHEREAS, it is in the City's intent to conduct such hazardous material removal, site
remediation,and memorial construction in the event the ownership of the property reverts back to the
City.
25
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2018-088
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEWARD, ALASKA that:
Section 1.The City of Seward finds it advisable to have resources available in the event the
Jesse Lee Home reverts back to City ownership.
Section 2. The City of Seward hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept the Department
of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development Grant in the amount of$1,07 3,441.4o.and
to execute all documents related to the grant on behalf of the City.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect thirty(30) days after approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward,Alaska this 26`h day
of November, 2018.
THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
a"IQk�-k I -
David Squires, Mayr
AYES: Squires, McClure, Towsley, Horn, Seese, Osenga, Lane
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Brenda J. Ballou, MMC
City Clerk li 9 c f y C le /c
(City Seal)
O�
v �� PORpok '•.> rt
SEA.
.... •Ittv f,..
tigjE OF iM-NC'•'x
26
DESIGNATED LEGISLATIVE GRANT FINANCIAL/PROGRESS REPORT
Department of Commerce,Community,and Economic Development,Division of Community and Regional Affairs
Grantee. City of Seward Grant Number: 19-RR-004
Project Title:Hazardous material removal and site remediation at the Jesse Lee Home for the fiscal years ending June 30,2019,June 30,2020,
and June 30,2021
Reporting Period:
Report No: 6 ❑ Monthly R] Quarterly From: October 01,2019 To:December 31,2019
Cost Category Authorized Budget Expenditures this Total Grant Expenditures to Date Balance of Grant Funds
Report Period
Project Funds 1,073,441.46 0.00 0.00 1,073,441.46
Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total This Report 1,073,441.46 0.00 0.00 1,073,441.46
Current Advance Balance(if any) 0.00
Total Grant Expenditures This Period 0.00 Total Grant Award 1,073,441.46
LESS Advance Recovered This Report(if any) 0.00 LESS Total Grant Expenditures to Date 0.00
NET REIMBURSEMENT TO GRANTEE 0.00 LESS Unrecovered Advance Balance 0.00
Advance Balance Remaining(if any) 0.00 TOTAL Grant Funds Remaining 1,073,441.46
Progress Report: Describe activity that supports the expenditures during the period.If no activity has taken place please provide an
explanation. Identify any problems you have experienced and or accomplishments this period.Attach additional pages if necessary.
The project is on-going,but the City of Seward sources is still being used for labor. There was no financial activity for
this period.
Grantee Certification: l certify that the above information is true and
correct,and that expenditures have been made for the purpose of and DCCED Staff Use:
In accordance with,applicable grant agreement terms and conditions.
Encumbrance No:
y� Payment Amount:
- i L ' —� GA Approval:
Aut rued Slgn re Date Date
SCOTT MESZAROS,CITY MANAGER DCCED Signature Date
Name and Title
Revised 05/2012
27
a
lisp
VA
-----------------------------------------
G i
e
w
y
. �
4
Quick History
■ 1925 Jewel Guard & Goode Hall built
■ 1936 Balto Building and arcades built
■ 1964 Earthquake damaged the building
— Building Vacant since this time.
— Goode Hall demolished
■ Various owners and proposed development of the building over the
years—none have come to fruition likely due to cost.
1995 & 1999 Engineer reviews questioned feasibility of rehabilitation
■ Some recent work (2010) has been done to shore-up/stabilize the
building.
it Ilil(](i(�Ifi(fil������lGl(,QGlrl�li(i�iafialf,G�����(li������fi(Glfil( �
��i ���1�4'�RV.�ll W'14' 1tR114'(RV.4V19'14't0V.4llV. 4' 9'14'V
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Scope of Step 1
■ Review previous reports (where available)
■ Hazardous Materials Evaluation
■ Structural Engineer Evaluation (for safety)
,,Utilize State Grant to remove hazmat
Consider both approaches
REFURBISH or DEMOLISH
R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Dackgro nd Research
■ Talk of Rehabilitation/Concepts for many decades
■ 2003 Historic Structure Report (ECl/Hyer, Inc.)
— Condition Survey and Assessment for Rehab ($8.3M)
— Recommended short-term stabilization efforts
■ 2011 White Environmental Asbestos & Lead Inspection
■ Feb. 2011 Schneider & Associates Shoring Report
— Recommendations of immediate shoring of dangerous or imminent
structural failure
■ July 2011 Schneider & Associates Structural Engineering Assessment
— Reviewed In-progress shoring efforts
— Recommend repairs to bring to min. code for occupancy ($12.8M):
■ Ranged from foundation repairs, to infill stud framing, full plywood floor overlay,
and full roof replacement, replacing stairs, etc.—
■ 2013 Schneider & Associates: Rehabilitation Design (65%1
k1ko
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Hazardous Materials Assessment
EHS-Alaska, Inc.
■ Inspection of hazmat that may be disturbed during
rehabilitation or demolition.
— Asbestos & Lead
— Took samples to supplement 2011 White Enviro.
— Also assume mercury in any lights or switches.
1
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
lab M
Remove prior Remove prior Rehab?
to D- •
Pipe insulation Yes Yes
Tank insulation in boiler room Yes Yes
gxg floor tiles Yes Yes
Window glazing No Yes
Boiler gaskets & Sealants No No (remove w/ boiler)
Flange gaskets and valve packings on No Yes
mechanical equipment
Fiberboard ceilings (Balto Bldg) No Yes
Hardboard stair tread (Arcade to Jewel Bldg) No Yes
Tar paper flooring underlayment No Yes
Grit surfaced roll roofing patching tars No Yes
7 • • indicates it may be
IL place during demolition of building
s "
p
A:
I;
d : bib
Photo 33: Balto Kitchen,asbestos tar paper under plywood subfloor.
law
TCrawlspace
2020..Di. 13 A 5.10
Photo M, Balto dining area.note dam tied vinyl asbestos floor the 44: West Arcade to Jewel Guard,damaged pipe insulation in soil
a.
> a
x
n
Photo 46: East Arcade to Goode Hall,damaged pipe insulation in soil,concrete rubble
Photo 2T Basement Jewel Guard,damaged asbestos pipe insulation
ern
r,
Q 2020.02. 13 12
tiOtn 22 Basement Jewel Guard,damaged asbestos pipe insulation in soil. Photo 4'3 Balto,Vilest Stair,with damaged asbestos pipe insulation,hatch to west Arcade to Jewel Guard.
Hazardous Materials Assessment
EHS-Alaska, Inc.
Remove priorto Remove prior Rehab?
Metallic Lead in
Demo?
Waste . vent - -
and flashings (incl. • • flashing)
Ceramic glazing No No
All painted surfaces (window frames, Disturbance requires trained personnel,
exterior stucco, etc.) regulations are performance based.
Testing of demolition debris is required
(for both - • or - •
Ek
*A TCLP test of the waste stream(s) produced by the Contra'
are required to be performed to determine if those wastes will be hazardous or
non-hazardous. If results are hazardous then special handing/disposal is required.
1
R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
structural Assessment
■ Subcontractor Schneider Engineers was asked
to update their 2011 assessments.
■ Identify dangerous conditions & make
recommendations regarding repairs for safe
access for Hazmat abatement prior to demo or
rehab activities.
R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Structural Assessment-Results
■ As expected—more degradation since 2011
■ Wall collapse at several locations
■ Floor collapse/partial collapse at several locations
■ Roof system: broken rafters, severely deflected members, and fully or
partially collapsed sections.
■ Areas of compromised beam and post systems (rotten materials or poor
construction)
■ Concrete foundations: locations with severe spalling/cracking, general
weather degradation. Also some structural wood embedded in concrete is
rotte n.
■ 2011 Shoring Recommendations
— Partially executed
— Good shoring and completely repaired flooring in several locations
— Some shoring not properly constructed—unbraced, insufficient load paths, set on
compromised flooring systems, etcShoring needed for safe access for
abatement. Must be designed and
constructed in co• • -
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. , • , - - nt contractor.
a
y �
e ,
r � -
h
x�
t
1 ,
... -
a,
4
Wall collapse examples
It
s .
I P �"
, M"
+
ty Figure 4: Area of Boiler Room Wall, where Collapse Occurred and Remainder was Demolished.
Exterior'Nall Collapse and Chimney Above Boiler Room. If Access to this Area is R
Add Temporary Shoring to Chimney. *Tote 1"
4
wzy
a
v
"wn
r'
Y
1
" la
Figure 9: Floor Call:
loor-Rotten from Exposure. Provide Temporary Shoring Below, Replace o
Rotten Joists and Overlay with Sheathing as Necessary'*Ilate 1««
Figure 16:Roof Rotten,Previously Temporary Cover Attached,With Additional Degradation and
► CONSULTANTS, Rot at Surround.Not Issue for Access to Abate.
a
�P
\ r
Figure 24:Collapsed Stairs and Surrounding Structure in Pocr Condition.**Note 1** Figure 33:Wood Studs Embedded in Concrete/Mortar,Rotten atop Concrete Wall.Floor May Need
Replace with Temporary Stair for Abatement Purposes if Required.Overlay Sheathing As Necessar Sheathing Overlay
for Abatement Purposes
7fGah t'
41
g li ig Figure 31:Column Rotten at Floor Intercept.Surrounding Floor Also Rotten.Temporary Wood
Shoring Similar in Size is Required to Bring Conditions to Safe Entry Condition.**Mote I**
\A 4
«.±■. � z � < ^ \ � y .
. .\
: » =d ■ �� . % � ^
� . f
Figure 41: Newly Established Flooring and Joist System, Good Constr
eqn 38: Newly Established Bracing edReinforcing Systems with Tension Ties. Good
CONSULTANTS, Construction Practices 0Eerd.
N
y � 7
IY
Figure 6: Area Exhibits
Paths Established to Foun
Degradation and Lack of W fa
^° Abatement Reps
Figure 5:Unbraced Shoring.Add Diagonal Bracing to Shoring.
d
Summary/
■ Considerable further deterioration since zo11.
■ No entry except qualified licensed professionals.
■ Asbestos & Lead are present.
— Some must be removed prior to demolition and/or renovation of the
building.
— Some may remain if the building is demolished, and may be disposed
with demolition debris.
■ Prior to hazmat abatement, a new temporary shoring design should
be completed
— Specific to the abatement plan
— Conducted by a licensed structural engineer
■ Hazmat abatement approach may be different depending on whether
the building is to be refurbished or demolished.
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
")udgetary Estimates
"inROM Estimate ROM Estimate
Refurbish (zoz�) Demolish (zoz�)
Shoring • r Hazmat Removal $0.2M •
TotalAbatement • 6M to
Building Demolition •
Building Refurbish
• code, not •
• Project: • i to
Note: Estimates do not include any fuel or other unknown contamination on property.
Notes:
1. Wayne Schmidt, Alaska Abatement Corporation (907) 563-0088
2. Nate Simms, Alaska Demolition (907) 274-DEMO
3. Based on 2011 Estimate plus 7% peryearto 2021 (escalation/inflation)
4. If Refurbish is not to begin soon, should invest in additional short " w
the structure until a later date not included
R&M CONISULTANTS, INC. - - 'A M-J
Recommendations
for Hazmat Abatement (Step 2)
■ City to decide: Rehabilitate or Demolish?
— Select abatement approach that coincides with future fate of the
buildings.
■ RFP for abatement & demo (using grant $$).
— If rehabilitation:
■ Abatement will be more expensive, conducted in advance of construction.
■ Most of cost is due to difficult access to asbestos and cost of disposal.
■ Should include additional shoring (design and construction) for long-term
stabilization of the structure until rehabilitation work is started.
— If demolition:
■ Can likely achieve both demolition and abatement <$1M.
■ Costto rebuild newstructureon site, similartoJLH is likelyll
of refurbishing the existing structures.
V R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Questions/Discussion
-°
�N
17,
1
5 -
1 '
R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Jesse Lee Home r'•11 Out of Service
Parcels ff I In Service
® Manholes Water Main
0 Service Connections ® Utility Pole
Gravity Mains Overhead Circuit
BENSON
DO RA
■
X
Z
w
O
a
NP
t-
Aab
0,
n`iIf
f Q
co
44
Location Map - 0 60 120 240Feet
1824 Phoenix JESSE LEE HEIGHTS SUB
Jesse Lee Home Parcels N
ADDN NO 4 LOTS 15A, 15B
Due to different data sources property lines and aerial imagery do not
overlay correctly. Map is to be used for orientation and reference purposes only. Drawn By: EAK 06/30/2020
48
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
SECTION 02 26 00— HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.01 SECTION INCLUDES
A. The Hazardous Materials Assessment for the proposed construction is included with these
Contract Documents.
1.02 USE OF INFORMATION
A. The Hazardous Materials Assessment is provided for the Contractor's information and use
in the planning and performance of work in areas containing hazardous or potentially
hazardous materials as outlined in Paragraph 1.03.
1. The information provided in the Hazardous Materials Assessment is based on
samples collected in various locations of the building. Thus, the Owner and/or its
Representative cannot guarantee or warrant that actual conditions encountered
might not vary from the information presented in these reports.
2. The data reported in the Hazardous Materials Assessment is accurate to the best
of the Owner's and it's Representative's knowledge. The requirements contained
in these specifications and in the relevant state and federal regulations pertaining
to the performance of work in areas containing hazardous or potentially hazardous
materials provide guidance for the contractor for performance of work in these
areas. The Owner and its Representative disclaim all responsibility for the
Contractor's erroneous conclusions regarding the information presented in these
reports; the requirements contained in these specifications; and the requirements
of applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to performance of work in
these areas.
3. The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining additional information if
Contractor deems it necessary to carry out the work.
B. It is highly recommended that the contractor visit the site to acquaint themselves with
existing conditions.
C. Attached Hazardous Materials Assessment
1.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOTIFICATION:
A. Notification of Potential Hazards: Asbestos, lead and other potentially hazardous materials
are present in the building that may impact the work of all trades. Regulated air
contaminants, including asbestos and lead, are also present in settled and concealed dust
in and on architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical components or systems
throughout the building. All trades shall coordinate with other trades and conduct their
work to prevent worker exposure or site contamination. This notification is provided in
accordance with EPA and OSHA requirements.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
Not Used
PART 3 - EXECUTION
Not Used
Seward Jesse Lee Home 49 Section 02 26 00
Page 1 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
ASSESSMENT
i
JESSE LEE HOME CONCEPTUAL STUDY
SEWARD, ALASKA
Surveyed
February 13, 2020
Report Date
April 6, 2020
ElI&ALASKA, INC.
ENGINEERING,HEALTH&SAFETY CONSULTANTS
11901 BUSINESS BLVD.,SUITE 208
EAGLE RIVER,ALASKA 99577-7701
Seward Jesse Lee Home 50 Section 02 26 00
Page 2 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
JESSE LEE HOME CONCEPTUAL STUDY
SEWARD, ALASKA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................................................4
A. GENERALIZED REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS..............................................4
B. BUILDING DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................5
C. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................6
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................................6
2. Lead-Containing Materials .......................................................................................................6
D. SURVEY RESULTS...........................................................................................................................6
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................................6
2. Asbestos in Dusts...................................................................................................................12
3. Lead-Containing Materials .....................................................................................................12
4. PCB-Containing Materials......................................................................................................13
5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................13
6. Other Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................14
E. REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS......................................................................................................14
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ..............................................................................................14
2. Dusts with Asbestos...............................................................................................................15
3. Lead-Containing Materials .....................................................................................................15
4. PCB-Containing Materials......................................................................................................16
5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................16
6. Other Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................16
F. RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................................17
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ..............................................................................................17
2. Dusts with Asbestos...............................................................................................................17
3. Lead-Containing Materials .....................................................................................................17
4. PCB-Containing Materials......................................................................................................17
5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................17
6. Other Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................18
G. LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................................................18
1. Accuracy of Information..........................................................................................................18
2. Site Conditions .......................................................................................................................18
3. Changing Regulatory Constraints ..........................................................................................18
APPENDICES
Appendix A.........................................................Asbestos Bulk Field Survey Data Sheets and Lab Reports
Appendix B......................................................................2011 Asbestos & Lead Inspection Report by WEC
Appendix C..................................................................................................... Drawings of Sample Locations
AppendixD....................................................................................................................................Key Photos
Appendix E.......................................................................................................Rough Estimate of Quantities
Seward Jesse Lee Home 51 Section 02 26 00
Page 3 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
JESSE LEE HOME CONCEPTUAL STUDY
SEWARD, ALASKA
OVERVIEW
The Jesse Lee Home, located in Seward, Alaska, was surveyed for the presence of asbestos-containing
materials (ACM), and other potentially hazardous materials for the City of Seward. The survey also
provided a "good faith" inspection for hazardous materials that may be disturbed during future preservation
or demolition work. The proposed work would also include the disturbance, demolition, removal and
disposal of lead-containing paints and/or lead-containing materials that is incidental to the project. Mr.
Robert A. French, P.E. of EHS-Alaska, Inc. (EHS-Alaska) conducted the inspection February 2020.
A. GENERALIZED REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Potentially hazardous materials have been identified in Jesse Lee Home that will be affected by any
demolition or renovations. Those materials include asbestos, lead, mercury, and radioactive materials. Not
all materials were tested for potentially hazardous components, other potentially hazardous materials,
including those exterior to the building, such as contamination from underground fuel tanks may be present,
but are not part of this report.
Buildings or portions of buildings that were constructed prior to 1978 which are residences, or contain day
care facilities, kindergarten classes or other activities frequently visited by children under 6 years of age
are classified as child occupied facilities. All work classified as "renovations" or disturbing more than 6
square feet of lead-based painted surfaces per room for interior activities or more than 20 square feet for
exterior activities in child occupied facilities must comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 745. The
Buildings are not currently classified as a child occupied facility, but the requirements of 40 CFR 745 may
be applicable if the buildings are not demolished, and instead are renovated to house or serve children on
a regular basis. If the building is renovated into an adult facility, the requirements of 40 CFR 745 would not
apply, but"lead safe work practices" would be utilized to comply with OSHA lead regulations, and to avoid
contamination of the site.
This survey was not intended to find or identify all of the potentially hazardous materials at the site, but to
provide guidance to the City of Seward in making their determination as to what will happen with the site.
Should a project move forward, this baseline data will be used to coordinate and fully develop a hazardous
materials removal design that will identify the presence, locations and quantities of asbestos and/or other
hazardous materials that will be affected by this project. The removal and disposal of potentially hazardous
materials are highly regulated, and it is anticipated that removal and disposal of asbestos, lead and
chemical hazards will be conducted by a subcontractor to the general contractor who is qualified for such
removal. It is anticipated that the general contractor and other trades will be able to conduct their work
using engineering controls and work practices to control worker exposure and to keep airborne
contaminants out of occupied areas of the building.
Settled and concealed dusts in areas not subject to routine cleaning are present throughout the building,
including the roof, and inside and on top of architectural, mechanical, electrical, and structural elements,
and those dusts are assumed to contain regulated air contaminants. This should not be read to imply that
there is an existing hazard to building occupants (normal occupants of the building as opposed to
construction workers working in the affected areas). However, depending on the specific work items
involved and on the means and methods employed when working in the affected areas, construction
workers could be exposed to regulated air contaminants from those dusts in excess of the OSHA
Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs).
Seward Jesse Lee Home 52 Section 02 26 00
Page 4 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
NOTE: Asbestos-containing debris was noted from damaged or removed materials were found throughout
the facility, and it is likely that the dusts in these areas may contain more than one percent (1%) asbestos
by weight, and therefore would be classified as an asbestos-containing material (ACM). Reference 40 CFR
763.83. All asbestos-containing debris would need to be removed prior to either renovation or demolition.
"Awareness training"(typically 2 hours)and possibly respiratory protection will be required for all Contractor
Personnel who will be disturbing the dusts. The extent of the training and protective measures will depend
upon the airborne concentrations measured during air monitoring of the contractors work force, which
depends on the means and methods employed to control the dusts. The air monitoring may be discontinued
following a "negative exposure assessment" showing that worker exposures are below the OSHA
permissible exposure limits for the type of work and means and methods employed. Previous air monitoring
from similar jobs with similar conditions may be used as historical data to establish a "negative exposure
assessment".
B. BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The Jesse Lee Home was originally constructed in 1925, consisting of the Jewel Guard Hall and the Goode
Hall, which were the Boys and Girls Dormitories for the Jesse Lee Home for Children, an orphanage. In
1936, the middle building, the Balto Building, with a central kitchen and dining space, as well as boiler plant
was added, along with connecting arcades to the two dormitory buildings. There have been various
undocumented upgrades and repairs through the years, one of which was a boiler replacement project in
1957. Due to extensive contamination from asbestos debris, it is recommended to continue to restrict
access to the Buildings.
The Goode Hall was severely damaged by the 1964 earthquake, and was subsequently demolished.
Judging by the lack of knowledge about asbestos and lead hazards at that time, and the abandoned piping
at the cut point of the East Arcade, it is assumed that there will be buried (or exposed) debris that contain
asbestos and lead at the site of the former Goode Hall, which are likely buried in vegetation.
The buildings were of wood framing with concrete footings and basement walls, and some interior concrete
walls in the basement. Portions of the buildings had crawl spaces with dirt floors.
The exterior finish was of a very hard stucco or concrete finish, that because it appeared to be uniform
throughout both eras of construction, which could have been installed as part of the 1936 addition, or could
be original with each building. Photos from before the 1936 addition do appear to have similar stucco
siding. The tree silhouettes painted on the stucco during WWII as camouflage is still partially visible on the
north side of the buildings.
The interior wall and ceiling finishes have been mostly removed. There were partial finishes left in portions
of the Balto Building, with very minor amounts of finishes found in the Jewel Guard building. Those finishes
were sampled by this project in order to get an idea of what might be present in the debris located
throughout the building.
Floor finishes were extensively damaged, with vinyl asbestos tile in portions of the Balto Building, and non-
asbestos "lineoleum" in the Jewel Guard Hall and Arcades. Most areas had an original hardwood floor
visible under the damaged flooring.
The buildings had been previously heated by a steam heating system combined with various radiators. The
heating and domestic water piping was typically insulated with asbestos-containing "Aircell" and "Mag"
insulation, and asbestos-containing "Hard Fitting" insulation. Similarly, the roof drain piping had asbestos-
containing insulation. The asbestos-containing pipe insulation was severely damaged, with friable and
hazardous debris in all locations where piping had been located.
There did not appear to be any ventilation systems,with ventilation originally provided by operable windows.
The windows had been mostly removed, leaving the building open to snow and rain.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 53 Section 02 26 00
Page 5 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
The roof was originally of cedar shingles, applied without tar paper. While reinforced poly had been applied
over that roofing in the past 10 years or so, the poly has deteriorated, and currently has numerous holes.
C. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
The survey included sampling of suspect ACM materials that had not been sampled in prior asbestos
surveys, or samples of materials where previous sampling had been inconsistent. Refer to the 2011
asbestos and lead inspection report by WEC, which is included as Appendix B. Additional testing of
materials pertinent to the project was conducted and is included in this report.
The samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM), the method
of analysis recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine the
composition of suspected asbestos-containing materials (EPA method 600/M4-82-020). Only materials
containing more than 1% total asbestos were classified as "asbestos-containing" based on EPA and the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) criteria. Samples that were analyzed to have less
than 10% asbestos were "point-counted" by the laboratory for more accuracy. Samples that are listed as
having a "Trace by Point Count" had asbestos fibers found in the material, but the fibers were not present
at the counting grids. Table 1 in Part D below contains a summary list of the asbestos bulk samples and
the applicable results.
The Bulk Asbestos samples were analyzed for asbestos content by International Asbestos Testing
Laboratories (IATL), Mt. Laurel, New Jersey a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
EPA regulations under 40 CFR 763 requires the use of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) to determine
whether or not a material contains asbestos. While PLM analysis does a good job for most materials, it
does have some limitations, both in the size of the fibers that are visible under a standard optical
microscope, and because the organic matrix that the fibers are bound within can obscure the fibers. At the
discretion of the building inspector and the client, some types of samples may be analyzed or re-analyzed
by what is called TEM NOB, or Transmission Electron Microscopy for Non-Friable Organically Bound
materials. TEM NOB is the definitive method for determining if asbestos is present, but TEM NOB use is
not required by the EPA. TEM NOB analysis was not done for this project.
Field survey data sheets and laboratory reports of the bulk samples are included in Appendix A. Drawings
showing sample locations are included as Appendix C.
2. Lead-Containing Materials
About the only remaining paint at the buildings was at the exterior stucco, and at window and door trim. All
previous lead in paint samples of those paints taken by WEC in 2011 were classified as lead-based paint.
Therefore no paint testing was included in this survey. Refer to the Paint Test information shown in
Appendix B.
EPA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) have defined lead-based paint as any
paint or other surface coating that contains lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter
(mg/cm2) or 0.5 percent by weight.
D. SURVEY RESULTS
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
Seward Jesse Lee Home 54 Section 02 26 00
Page 6 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
The following Table 1 A lists the samples taken in February 2020, and the results of the laboratory analysis.
Asbestos field survey data sheets and laboratory reports are included as Appendix A. Refer to Appendix
C for sample locations.
TABLE 1A
SAMPLE MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS
NUMBER CONTENT
JLH0220-AO1 Fiberboard, probably from Balto Hall, Basement, Maint shop, None Detected
ceiling Photo 394
JLH0220-AO2 Fiberboard,from walls of stair Balto Hall, Basement, East Stairs, None Detected
tower Photo 395
JLH0220-AO3 Fiberboard,from walls of stair Balto Hall, Basement, West Stairs, None Detected
towe r P hoto464
JLH0220-AO4 Fiberboard, ceiling at light Balto Hall, Basement,West 0.25% Chrysotile
Stairs, Photo455
Lab identified the asbestos as a
likely surface contamination
JLH0220-AO5 Stucco (concrete) Balto Hall, Exterior, SE Corner, None Detected
Photo 505 &506
JLH0220-AO6 Stucco patch at crack Balto Hall, Exterior, SE Corner, None Detected
Photo 505 &506
JLH0220-AO7 Stucco (concrete) Balto Hall, Exterior, SW Corner, None Detected
Photo 513
JLH0220-AO8 Tar paper under stucco Balto Hall, Exterior, SW Corner, None Detected
Photo 513
JLH0220-AO9 Tar paper under stucco Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, South None Detected
side, corner of S wing to E wing,
Photo 540
JLH0220-A10 Stucco (concrete) Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, South None Detected
side, corner of S wing to E wing,
Photo 540
JLH0220-Al1 Tar paper under stucco Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, South None Detected
side, by Stairs, Photo 542&543
JLH0220-Al2 Stucco (concrete) Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, South None Detected
side, by Stairs, Photo 542&543
JLH0220-A13 Green mineral coated thick tar Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, West None Detected
paper side,At window patch at SW
Corner, Photo 550
JLH0220-A14 Green mineral coated thick tar Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior,West None Detected in
paper with patching tar or side, Collapsed Roof over stair to Tar Paper. 1.2%
tabbing tar Bsmt, Photo 555 chrysotile in patch
tar
JLH0220-A15 Marlite Balto Hall, at west stairs, 1st floor, None Detected
Photo 42, similar.
JLH0220-A16 Jute backed linoleum, greenish Balto Hall,west hall, 1st floor, Photo None Detected
585 &6
JLH0220-A17 Brown VAT&black mastic Balto Hall, South dining area, 1st 4.7%chrysotile in
floor, Photo 10 similar. tile, None Detected
in black mastic
JLH0220-A18 Tar paper under plywood Balto Hall, 1st floor, Kitchen, 7.7% chrysotile
Photo 587
Seward Jesse Lee Home 55 Section 02 26 00
Page 7 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
SAMPLE MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS
NUMBER CONTENT
Z e JLH0220- Crepe paper with tar paper Balto Hall, 2nd floor, room over None Detected both
A19 kitchen at side walls to attic space. layers
Photo 590
JLH0220-A20 Cardboard holding up crepe Balto Hall, 2nd floor, room over None Detected
paper. kitchen at side walls to attic space.
Photo 590
JLH0220-A21 Fibrous paper, with light yellow Balto Hall, 2nd floor, east side near None Detected both
mastic hall, Photo 591 layers
JLH0220-A22 Fibrous paper, with light yellow Balto Hall, 2nd floor, west side None Detected both
mastic center, Photo 592 layers
JLH0220-A23 Fiberboard ceiling Balto Hall, 2nd floor, west side None Detected
center, Photo 64
JLH0220-A24 Hardboard at stairs Jewel Guard Hall,at bottom of 0.25% chrysotile
stairs to West Arcade. Photo 77
similar.
Lab identified the asbestos as a
likely surface contamination
JLH0220-A25 Brown Jute backed Linoleum, Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected.
cream mastic wing, SE portion. Photo 596 Insufficient mastic to
analyze
JLH0220-A26 Fiber board, under plaster at Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected
column wing, on center north column.
Photo 602
JLH0220-A27 Skim coat of plaster Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected
wing, on center north column.
Photo 602
JLH0220-A28 Scratch coat of plaster Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected
wing, on center north column.
Photo 602
JLH0220-A29 Cream& brown Jute backed Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected.
Linoleum, cream mastic wing, near center north column. Insufficient mastic to
Photo 603 analyze
JLH0220-A30 1/4"gypsum board, plaster Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected all 3
scratch coat, plaster skim coat, wing, NE Corner at light hole. Photo layers
paint 604
JLH0220-A31 1/4 inch gypsum board Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected
wing, remnant at ceiling. Photo 605
JLH0220-A32 1/4 inch gypsum board Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE None Detected
wing, remnant at beam. Photo 605
JLH0220-A33 Joint compound Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, NE 2.0%chrysotile
wing,West side at light hole.
Patching a hole, light removed.
Photo 607
JLH0220-A34 Shower Pan concrete Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, 2nd None Detected
layer of concrete, etc. at raised
showers, center wing. Photo 612
JLH0220-A35 Shower Pan concrete Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, 2nd None Detected
layer of concrete, etc. at raised
showers, center wing. Photo 610
JLH0220-A36 Brown Jute backed Linoleum, Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, near None Detected all 3
mastic,tar paper west door, Photo 617 layers
Seward Jesse Lee Home 56 Section 02 26 00
Page 8 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
SAMPLE MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS
NUMBER CONTENT
JLH0220-A37 Tar paper, loose Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, near None Detected
west door, Probably from wall? Or
ceiling. Photo 619
JLH0220-A38 Plaster, scratch &finish Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, by 1st None Detected both
window south of hall. Photo 620 layers
JLH0220-A39 Brown Jute backed Linoleum, Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, west None Detected both
white mastic stairs, Photo 622 layers
JLH0220-A40 Plaster Remnant at side of stairs Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor, west None Detected
stairs, Photo 624
JLH0220-A41 Red shower concrete lining Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd floor, 2nd None Detected
layer of concrete, etc. at raised
showers, center wing. Photo 623
JLH0220-A42 Plaster, scratch &finish Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd floor, NE None Detected both
Corner of Chapel. Photo 625 layers
JLH0220-A43 Brown 9x9 floor tile, Black Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor, 3.3%chrysotile in
mastic bathroom of SE corner Room. mastic, none
Photo 627 detected in mastic
JLH0220-A44 Cream& brown, Jute backed Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd floor, room None Detected
linoleum by Chimney. Photo 628
JLH0220-A45 Cardboard holder of insulation Jewel Guard Hall, 3rd floor, attic None Detected
joists at center section. Photo 632
JLH0220-A46 Fiberboard Jewel Guard Hall, 3rd floor, N side None Detected
by window center section. Photo
633
JLH0220-A47 Plaster, scratch &finish Jewel Guard Hall, 3rd floor, N side None Detected, Lab
by window center section. Photo did not find 2 layers
633
JLH0220-A48 Plaster, scratch &finish Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd floor, NE None Detected both
corner of W wing. Photo 621 1 layers
The testing method used(polarized light microscopy[PLM])is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and
similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing,
confirmation should be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy TEM .
The following Table 1B lists the samples taken in March 2011, by White Environmental Consultants, Inc.
(WEC), and the results of the laboratory analysis. Refer to the WEC Asbestos and Lead Survey Report
included as Appendix E, for information about materials previously sampled, and shown to contain
asbestos.
TABLE 1 B
SAMPLE MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS
NUMBER CONTENT
049-01 Floor the no size or color JG Hall, 3rd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-02 Fiber board JG Hall, 3rd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-03 Plaster/Skim coat JG Hall, 3rd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-04 Floor the no size or color JG Hall, 3rd floor Hallway None Detected
049-05 Floor Felt JG Hall, 3rd floor Hallway None Detected
049-06 Electrical Insulation JG Hall, 2nd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-07 Floor the no size or color JG Hall, 2nd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-08 Plaster/Skim coat JG Hall, 2nd floor East side by chimney None Detected
049-09 TSI -Line JG Hall, 2nd floor East side by 40% chrysotile
chimney
Seward Jesse Lee Home 57 Section 02 26 00
Page 9 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
SAMPLE MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS
NUMBER CONTENT
049-10 TSI -Debris JG Hall, 2nd floor,West side 40% chrysotile
049-11 Floor tile debris (no size or JG Hall, 2nd floor, West side None Detected
color
049-12 Plaster/Skim coat 1st floor,West Entry Way None Detected
049-13 TSI -Debris 1st floor,West Side on Floor 40% chrysotile
049-14 Sheet Vinyl (likely linoleum 1st floor,West Stairs None Detected
049-15 Exterior Stuco West side of JG Hall None Detected
049-16 Floor tile/mastic debris JG Hall, 1st floor Hallway 4% chrysotile in
tile, ND in black
mastic
049-17 TSI -Line JG Hall, 1st floor, center at South wall 40% chrysotile
049-18 Window glazing JG Hall, 1st floor, East Win 4% chrysotile
049-19 TSI -Line JG Hall, 1st floor, East Win 40% chrysotile
049-20 Floor tile/mastic debris JG Hall, 1st floor, East Wing 4% chrysotile in
tile, ND in black
mastic
049-21 TSI -Elbow JG Hall, Basement,West Side 8% chrysotile,
12%amosite
049-22 TSI -Line JG Hall, Basement,West Side 40% chrysotile
049-23 TSI -Debris JG Hall, Basement,West Side 40% chrysotile
049-24 TSI -Elbow JG Hall, Basement, East Side 30% chrysotile
049-25 TSI -Line JG Hall, Basement, East Side 40% chrysotile
049-26 TSI -Line Balto Bldg,2nd floor,West Side 40% chrysotile
049-27 Floor tile/mastic debris Balto Bldg, 1st floor, SW side 4% chrysotile in
tile, ND in black
mastic
049-28 Window glazing Balto Bldg, 1st floor, SW side 3% chrysotile
049-29 Floor tile/mastic debris Balto Bldg, 1st floor, SE side 4% chrysotile in
tile, ND in black
mastic
049-30 Elec Wire Insulation Balto Bldg, 1st floor, SE side None Detected
049-31 Window glazing Balto Bldg, 1st floor, East side 5% chrysotile
049-32 TSI -Line Balto Bldg, Basement under West 25% chrysotile
Stairway
049-33 TSI -Elbow Balto Bldg, Basement under West 30% chrysotile
Stairway
049-34 Boiler Gasket Balto Bldg,West Boiler 90% chrysotile
049-35 Boiler Insulation Balto Bldg,West Boiler None Detected
049-36 Silver Seal Balto Bldg,West Boiler None Detected
049-37 Boiler Gasket Balto Bldg, East Boiler 90% chrysotile
049-38 Boiler Insulation Balto Bldg, East Boiler None Detected
049-39 Tank Insulation Balto Bldg, Boiler Room, South side 50% chrysotile
049-40 TSI—Debris Balto Bldg, Boiler Room Floor, SE 30% chrysotile
Side
049-41 Elec Wire Insulation Balto Bldg, Basement Center None Detected
049-42 Exterior Stucco Balto Bldg, SE Side None Detected
The testing method used(polarized light microscopy[PLM])is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and
similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing,
confirmation should be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy TEM .
The following materials have been found to contain asbestos in this or previous surveys, or were assumed
to contain asbestos.
1. Pipe insulation on heating, domestic water and roof drain piping (confirmed asbestos).
2. Tank insulation in boiler room of Balto Building (confirmed asbestos).
3. 9"x 9" floor tiles (confirmed asbestos) in both Jewel Guard and Balto Buildings.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 58 Section 02 26 00
Page 10 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
4. Window glazing compounds in both Jewel Guard and Balto Buildings (confirmed asbestos).
5. Joint compound found at a hole patch, typically not found elsewhere (confirmed asbestos).
6. Boiler gaskets and sealants (confirmed asbestos and assumed asbestos).
7. Flange gaskets and valve packings (assumed asbestos).
8. Remnants of fiberboard ceilings in Balto Building (trace of asbestos).
9. Remnants of hardboard at stair in Arcade to Jewel Guard Building (trace of asbestos).
10. Tar paper under plywood subflooring in Balto Building (conformed asbestos).
11. Mineral grit coated roofing with patching tar (confirmed asbestos).
The above asbestos-containing materials are further discussed below:
Pipe Insulation
Piping in the basement, crawl spaces, pipe chases, etc. are insulated with asbestos-containing insulation
on the runs and fittings. The insulation is generally highly damaged, with widespread debris and is
considered friable. All rocks and soil in the crawl spaces beneath the buildings and arcades are highly
contaminated with asbestos-containing debris. The piping and the asbestos-containing insulation would
need to be cleaned up to accomplish most of the structural repairs that are necessary. All of the piping
would need to be removed prior to demolition if the buildings were to be demolished or renovated.
Tank Insulation
There is a tank in the boiler room in the Balto Building that has asbestos-containing insulation. The
insulation is damaged, with widespread debris and is considered friable. The tank and the asbestos-
containing insulation would need to be cleaned up to accomplish any work in the boiler room. All of the
tank insulation would need to be removed prior to demolition if the buildings were to be demolished or
renovated.
9" x 9" Floor Tiles
There was heavily damaged vinyl asbestos floor tiles in the Balto Building that contain asbestos. The floor
tile mastics have thus far not been found to contain asbestos. There are some limited area of 9" x 9" vinyl
floor tiles in the Jewel Guard Hall that have also been found to contain asbestos, and have also been found
to not contain asbestos. The tile and mastic was damaged enough to be considered to be friable. All of
the floor tiles and debris would need to be removed prior to demolition if the buildings were to be demolished
or renovated.
Window Glazing Compounds
The window glazing compounds have been found to contain asbestos. The sealants are assumed to be
not friable and in good condition. The sealants and glazing compounds would likely be removed by any
projects that would include window replacement. The window glazing compounds could be left in place
during demolition with the rest of the building, as long as they do not become friable during demolition.
Boiler Gaskets and Sealants
Gaskets at the boilers have been found to be asbestos-containing. The sealants at the boilers are also
assumed to contain asbestos. These materials were in good condition but may become friable during
removal for replacement. The gaskets and sealants could be left in place unless the boilers are to be
removed or disturbed. The boilers are not expected to be able to be refurbished for use, and the gaskets
and sealants could be pulled out with the boilers if they are not dismantled or exposing the gaskets and
sealants.
Flange Gaskets and Valve Packing
Due to their age, gaskets and valve packing on mechanical equipment throughout the buildings, are
assumed to be asbestos-containing. The gaskets and valve packings would likely be removed along with
the pipe and insulation to accomplish the structural repairs. The non-friable gaskets and valve packings on
the piping (without any insulation) could be left in place during demolition if the buildings were to be
demolished.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 59 Section 02 26 00
Page 11 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
Fiberboard ceilings in Balto Building.
The remnants of fiberboard ceilings in the Balto Building had 1 out of 5 samples that the lab found to have
0.25% chrysotile asbestos, but also said that the fibers were not imbedded in the matrix of the material.
Because of the large amounts of asbestos debris from pipe insulation, etc., it is likely that the trace of
asbestos found was due to contamination. While little fiberboard ceilings were left, they would need to be
removed as part of likely renovations. The fiberboard could be left in place during demolition if the buildings
were to be demolished.
Hardboard stair tread in the Arcade stairs to Jewel Guard Building.
The remnants of hardboard stair treads at the Arcade Stairs to the Jewel Guard Building (likely built at the
same time as the 1936 Balto Building)was found to have 0.25% chrysotile asbestos. The lab said that the
fibers were not imbedded in the matrix of the material. Because of the large amounts of asbestos debris
from pipe insulation, etc., it is likely that the trace of asbestos found was due to contamination. While
scattered remnants of the flooring materials were left, they would need to be removed as part of likely
renovations. The hardboard flooring materials could be left in place during demolition if the buildings were
to be demolished.
Tar Paper Flooring Underlayment
Tar paper underlayment was found under a plywood subfloor in the Kitchen of the Balto Building. Because
it is typically sandwiched between the subflooring and the main floor sheathing, it is not possible to
determine the full extent of where the tar paper exists. The tar paper could also be present as a roofing
underlayment on the Balto Building. The tar paper can become friable, and would need to be partially
removed as part of likely renovations. The tar paper could be left in place during demolition if the buildings
were to be demolished.
Roofing Patching Tars
The main roofing of the buildings were of cedar shakes. There was a grit-surfaced roll roofing over a
collapsed roof at the west stairs to the basement level that had asbestos in a patching tar. The roofing
materials would need to be removed as part of likely renovations. The roofing materials could be left in
place during demolition if the buildings were to be demolished.
2. Asbestos in Dusts
The settled and concealed dusts were examined by an EPA Certified Building Inspector but no samples for
asbestos in dusts were authorized for this project. Based on their visual inspection and experience from
similar buildings, the inspector determined that the typical settled and concealed dusts are not "asbestos
debris" from an asbestos-containing building material (ACBM). Based on similar sampling from similar
buildings, the inspector also determined that the dusts are unlikely to contain more than one percent (1%)
asbestos by weight, and therefore are not an asbestos-containing material (ACM).
3. Lead-Containing Materials
Refer to the WEC Asbestos and Lead Survey Report included as Appendix E, for information about
materials previously sampled, and shown to contain lead. All of the paint chip samples that they took were
classified as lead-based paint.
Paints
There was very little painted surfaces left inside of the buildings, as most interior finishes had been removed.
There was some paint on the remaining window frames, and the entire stucco exterior was painted. As
stated above, lead based paints (paint containing more than 5,000 parts per million of lead)were identified
on all of the painted surfaces that WEC tested. Refer to the Regulatory requirements in Part E, and the
Recommendations in Part F below.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 60 Section 02 26 00
Page 12 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
Metallic Lead in Waste and Vent Piping and Flashing
Metallic lead items identified in the building included poured lead sealants at bell and spigot joints of waste
and vent piping and sheet lead flashings of the roof drains and assumed at other roof flashings. If removed
during renovation or demolition they should be recycled or disposed of as hazardous waste.
Ceramic Glazing
An abandoned bathtub was found in the Jewel Guard building, and the glazing of ceramic plumbing fixtures
should be assumed to contain high lead levels. The concentrations of lead in ceramic glazing compounds
should not be compared to lead-based paint criteria, as the glazing is inherently less likely to cause lead to
be present in dusts or on surfaces, where it can be ingested. Lead in ceramic tile glazing may not pose a
hazard to occupants, or workers performing renovation or demolition if lead-safe work practices are
followed. All ceramic tiles and fixtures in the facility should be assumed to contain lead.
Lead Dusts
The settled and concealed dusts were examined but no samples for lead in dusts were authorized for this
project. Based on their visual inspection and similar sampling from similar buildings, the inspector also
determined that the dusts are likely to have measurable concentrations of lead in the dusts.
4. PCB-Containing Materials
Light Ballasts
Older fluorescent lights typically have PCB-containing ballasts. PCB-containing ballasts in fluorescent
lights were banned in 1978, but manufacturers were allowed to use up existing stocks, and lights may have
been reused from other facilities. There were no fluorescent lights found in the buildings.
Older High Intensity Discharge (HID) lights may have PCB-containing ballasts. There were no HID lights
found in the buildings.
Bulk Products
Some older paints, sealants and other building materials may contain measurable amounts of PCB's. PCB
use in paints and sealants was supposed to have been discontinued in 1979. The EPA does not require
the sampling of bulk products, and no sampling of"Bulk Products" were authorized for this project.
5. Mercury-Containing Materials
Fluorescent Lamps
Fluorescent lamps use mercury to excite the phosphor crystals that coat the inside of the lamp. These
lamps contain from 15 to 48 milligrams of mercury depending on their age and manufacturer. There were
no fluorescent lights found in the buildings.
Thermostats
Electrical switches that may contain mercury were noted in the building in the boiler room, and would be
required to be removed prior to demolition.
High Intensity Discharge Lamps
High Intensity Discharge (HID) lamps use mercury and sodium vapors in the lamp, and also typically have
lead-containing solders at the bases. These lamps contain varying amounts of mercury depending on their
age and manufacturer. There were no HID lights found in the buildings.
All mercury-containing items being removed by this project are required to be disposed of as hazardous
waste or recycled.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 61 Section 02 26 00
Page 13 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
6. Other Hazardous Materials
Heavy Fuel Oil
There were two fuel oil tanks in the basement of the Balto Building that reportedly had "Bunker C" fuel oil,
a heavy, low grade fuel oil that is probably mostly solidified after over 50 years, but there were visible fuel
spills at the tanks..
Soil Contamination
The scope of work for EHS-Alaska, Inc. did not include investigation of soils for petroleum or other
contaminations. Because of lack of regulations at the time of the 1964 or 1965 demolition of the Goode
Hall, and the asbestos pipe insulation noted at the cut point of the East Arcade, it is likely that there is
asbestos debris in the vicinity of the old Goode Hall.
E. REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (29 CFR 1926.1101) and the State of Alaska
Department of Labor (8 AAC 61) have promulgated regulations requiring testing for airborne asbestos
fibers; setting allowable exposure limits for workers potentially exposed to airborne asbestos fibers;
establishing contamination controls, work practices, and medical surveillance; and setting worker
certification and protection requirements. These regulations apply to all workplace activities involving
asbestos-containing materials.
The EPA regulations, issued as Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 (40 CFR 61) under the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) established procedures for handling
ACM during asbestos removal and waste disposal. These regulations required an owner (or the owner's
contractor)to notify the EPA of asbestos removal operations and to establish responsibility for the removal,
transportation, and disposal of asbestos. Jesse Lee Home would NOT fall under the EPA's Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) law regulating asbestos in schools, however clearance
sampling would be recommended where interior asbestos-containing materials are removed.
The NESHAP regulations also address three categories of ACM in a building being demolished:
1. Friable, or regulated ACM (RACM) which must be removed from a building before the building is
demolished
2. Category I non-friable ACM (resilient flooring, asphalt roofing products, packing and gaskets)
3. Category 11 non-friable ACM (non-friable ACM other than Category I ACM).
If allowed by the disposal site, the EPA allows Category I and 11 non-friable ACM to remain in a building
during demolition if: (1) Category I ACM is not in poor condition and is not friable and (2) the probability is
low that Category 11 ACM will become crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder during demolition. The
condition of the ACM and method of demolition will generally determine if Category I and 11 non-friable ACM
may be left in the building during demolition. This EPA standard also requires that no visible emissions be
generated from the ACM during removal and transportation and does not allow intentional burning of any
building containing ACM.
The EPA regulations require an owner (or the owner's contractor) to notify the EPA of asbestos removal
operations and to establish responsibility for the removal, transportation, and disposal of asbestos-
containing materials.
The disposal of asbestos waste is regulated by the EPA, the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation, and the disposal site operator. Wastes being transported to the disposal site must be sealed
in leak tight containers prior to disposal and must be accompanied by disposal permits and waste manifests.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 62 Section 02 26 00
Page 14 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
2. Dusts with Asbestos
Settled and concealed dusts above ceilings, and at other areas that are not routinely cleaned (such as
inside ducts and at roofs, etc.) are assumed to have measurable concentrations of asbestos. Based on
sampling of similar settled and concealed dusts at similar buildings, those dusts are assumed to contain
less than 1 percent asbestos. Normal settled and concealed dusts are distinct and treated differently from
debris resulting from damaged asbestos-containing materials.
Background levels of asbestos in dusts for a particular location will depend on many factors, including
whether or not asbestos occurs naturally in soils in the area.
Likely sources of asbestos in dusts include natural occurrences of asbestos
The types of asbestos found in settled and concealed dusts often contain actinolite, anthophylite, and
tremolite forms of asbestos which are not commonly found in bulk samples taken of materials from
buildings. Those forms of asbestos may come from natural occurrences of asbestos in an outside source,
such as rock or ore deposits, which appear to be common in Alaska.
Because the type of disturbance, concentration of asbestos in the dusts, cohesiveness of the dusts and
room sizes will change, the airborne asbestos levels expected during the project will depend on the
contractor's means and methods of conducting the work. The mere presence of asbestos in the dusts does
not necessarily imply that a "hazard" exists which would require the use of specially trained workers to
"abate" the "hazard". All dusts will likely be required to be removed from the areas where asbestos-
containing materials are being removed (abatement areas) in order to achieve clearances. The dusts in
the other areas are to be controlled so as to limit worker exposures and prevent contamination of occupied
areas of the building.
There is no established correlation between settled or adhered dusts with measurable concentrations of
asbestos and airborne concentrations. The definition in the OSHA regulations of asbestos-containing
materials as those materials that contain 1 percent or more asbestos by weight, apply to cohesive materials
and not to dusts. The OSHA regulations are essentially"performance based", if workers are exposed above
the permissible exposure limits, then all of the requirements in the regulations become effective.
3. Lead-Containing Materials
The EPA Standard 40 CFR 745, Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention in Certain Residential Structures,
defines lead—based paint hazards and regulates lead based paint activities in target housing and child-
occupied facilities. The requirements of this regulation include training certification, pre-work notifications,
work practice standards and record keeping. Areas typically classified as child occupied facilities may
include but are not limited to: day care facilities, preschools, kindergarten classrooms, restrooms,
multipurpose rooms, cafeterias, gyms, libraries and other areas routinely used by children under 6 years of
age. New training requirements for Firms (Contractors) and Renovators (Workers) became effective on
April 22, 2010. The building is not currently classified as a child occupied facility,therefore the requirements
of 40 CFR 745 do not apply.
Federal OSHA (29 CFR 1926.62) and the State of Alaska (8 AAC Chapter 61) have promulgated
regulations that apply to all construction work where employees may be exposed to lead. The disturbance
of any surfaces painted with lead-containing paint requires lead-trained personnel, personnel protective
procedures, and air monitoring until exposure levels can be determined. If initial monitoring verifies that
the work practices being used are not exposing workers, monitoring and protection procedures may be
relaxed. Experience has shown that some paints in most buildings will contain low concentrations of lead
and disturbance of those paints are still regulated under the OSHA lead standard, 29 CFR 1926.62. Low
levels of lead found by XRF testing does not mean that the paints are free of lead, the paints may contain
lead, and OSHA regulations apply anytime measurable amounts of lead are present in paints.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 63 Section 02 26 00
Page 15 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
Settled and concealed dust above ceilings, and at other areas that are not routinely cleaned are assumed
to have measurable concentrations of lead. Background levels of lead in dusts for a particular location will
depend on many factors, including whether or not engines utilizing leaded gasoline were run in or near a
building, and upon the age of the building, and thus the age of the dusts. Because the type of disturbance,
quantity of lead dusts, cohesiveness of the dusts and room sizes will change, the airborne lead levels
expected during the project will depend on the contractor's means and methods of conducting the work.
The mere presence of lead in the dusts does not necessarily imply that a "hazard" exists which would
require the use of specially trained workers to "abate"the "hazard".
There is no established correlation between settled or adhered lead dust concentrations and airborne
concentrations. The OSHA regulations are essentially"performance based", if workers are exposed above
the permissible exposure limits, then all of the requirements in the regulations become effective.
The EPA requires that actual construction or demolition debris that contains lead or lead-containing paint
or other heavy metals be tested using the TCLP test to determine if the waste must be treated as hazardous
waste. All federal, state and local standards regulating lead and lead-containing wastes are required to be
followed during the renovation or demolition of portions of this building.
If the TCLP tests done on the waste stream(s)that are produced by the contractor are found to be classified
as hazardous wastes, then those waste stream(s) will have to be packaged for shipping and disposal in
accordance with hazardous waste and transportation regulations. Because there are no hazardous waste
landfills in Alaska, this report assumes that disposal will take place in Seattle or elsewhere in the Pacific
Northwest.
4. PCB-Containing Materials
The EPA has promulgated regulations (40 CFR Part 761) that cover the proper handling and disposal of
PCB-containing materials. The EPA regulates liquid PCBs differently from non-liquid materials. Workers
who remove or handle PCB-containing or PCB-contaminated materials or who transport or dispose of PCB
wastes must be trained and certified in hazardous waste operations and emergency response
(HAZWOPER) as required by 29 CFR 1910.120 and the State of Alaska Department of Labor(8 AAC 61).
The Department of Transportation under 49 CFR Parts 100-199 regulates the marking, packaging, handling
and transportation of hazardous materials. All federal, state and local standards regulating PCBs and PCB
waste must be followed during this project.
5. Mercury-Containing Materials
Float switches are classified by the EPA as Universal Wastes. The EPA encourages that all Universal
Wastes be recycled in accordance with 40 CFR 273. Mercury and mercury-containing products are
considered hazardous waste if TCLP testing of the waste for mercury confirms the mercury content to be
greater than the EPA criteria of 0.2 mg/I.
6. Other Hazardous Materials
Chemical Hazards
The EPA has promulgated regulations (40 CFR Parts 260 to 299 amongst others) that cover the proper
handling and disposal of waste chemicals, including listed wastes, which are ignitable, corrosive, reactive,
toxic, or an acute hazardous waste or wastes that exhibit the characteristics of toxicity. All construction
workers who are required to remove or handle chemical hazards or to transport or dispose of chemical
wastes shall be trained and certified as required by the U.S. Department of Labor (29 CFR 1910.120) and
the State of Alaska Department of Labor(8 AAC 61). Transportation of chemical hazards are regulated by
Department of Transportation regulations under 49 CFR Parts 171 to 178 amongst others.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 64 Section 02 26 00
Page 16 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
F. RECOMMENDATIONS
Disposal of hazardous materials is often difficult and expensive in Alaska. It is possible to obtain a one-
time permit to dispose of non-friable, non-RACM asbestos materials from the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation, however that process is neither fast nor inexpensive, and is highly dependent
on getting permission for an asbestos monofill from a landowner, and may not be financially feasible at
many locations. The Contractor will be required to test the waste stream(s) produced by their"means and
methods, and dispose of them accordingly. Lead-containing materials which are not classified as
hazardous waste(if they are not also asbestos-containing materials)are often possible to dispose of locally,
but in general, painted materials, with lead at measurable concentrations, are not allowed to be burned.
Lead-containing materials which have been classified as hazardous waste, and chemical hazards (such as
mercury, fuel oil, etc.) are required to be disposed of at permitted landfills, which will require air freight or
barge transportation for disposal.
1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
The asbestos-containing materials identified in the building are typically in intact condition and are classified
as both friable and non-friable ACM. All asbestos-containing materials that will be disturbed by the planned
renovation or demolition work are required to be removed by trained asbestos workers.
2. Dusts with Asbestos
Dusts with measurable concentrations of asbestos are assumed to be present, and most areas of the
buildings were contaminated with debris from asbestos-containing materials. Workers disturbing dusts are
required to have hazard communication training in accordance with OSHA regulations, but are not required
to receive 40 hours of training, which is required for asbestos workers. The contractor will need to choose
means and methods to control worker exposures to airborne contaminants. At least an initial exposure
assessment or data from previous air monitoring is needed to show that worker exposures are maintained
below the OSHA permissible exposure limits (PELs).
3. Lead-Containing Materials
Federal OSHA (29 CFR 1926.62) and the State of Alaska (8 AAC Chapter 61) have promulgated
regulations that apply to all construction work where employees may be exposed to lead, including
disturbance of paints with low concentrations of lead.
Worker exposure to lead may be able to be controlled below the OSHA permissible exposure limit if proper
engineering controls and procedures are used during renovation or demolition. Lead is a potentially
hazardous waste and the EPA requires that all wastes that contains lead be tested to determine if they
must be treated as hazardous waste. A TCLP test of the waste stream(s) produced by the Contractor's
means and methods are required to be performed to determine if those wastes will be hazardous or non-
hazardous.
4. PCB-Containing Materials
No PCB-containing materials were found during this preliminary survey. If any are discovered, and they
are removed or replaced, they will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance
with all regulations.
5. Mercury-Containing Materials
Mercury-containing materials are hazardous wastes or Universal Wastes, and any scheduled for removal
will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 65 Section 02 26 00
Page 17 of 18
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Division 02
Section 02 26 00
6. Other Hazardous Materials
The heavy fuel oils shall be removed and properly disposed of in accordance with all regulations and the
requirements of the disposal site.
G. LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon professional opinions with
regard to the subject matter. These opinions have been arrived at in accordance with currently accepted
environmental consulting and engineering standards and practices and are subject to the following inherent
limitations:
1. Accuracy of Information
The laboratory reports utilized in this assessment were provided by the accredited laboratories cited in this
report. Although the conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are based in part, on such information,
our services did not include the verification of accuracy or authenticity of such reports. Should such
information provided be found to be inaccurate or unreliable, EHS-Alaska, Inc. reserves the right to amend
or revise its conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations.
2. Site Conditions
This limited survey did not include investigation of the entire site and may not be valid outside the survey
area. The intent of this survey was to identify common hazardous materials that may be disturbed during
a currently undefined renovation or demolition. This survey is not intended to be utilized as the sole design
document for abatement. This survey was conducted while the site was filled with debris. All inspections
were performed with furniture, equipment and/or stored items in place. The scope of work for this survey
did not include identification of all potentially hazardous materials that may be present at this site, and was
limited to the scope of work agreed upon with our client. Although a concerted effort was made to identify
those common hazardous materials likely to be affected by this project, some hazardous materials may
have been hidden by furniture, equipment or stored items and may not have been identified. The survey
investigated representative materials and items, such as lights and mechanical components. Variations
may occur between materials and items that appear to be the same, but are actually of different construction
or materials. Other asbestos-containing or potentially hazardous materials may be present in the facilities
that were concealed by structural members, walls, ceilings or floor coverings, or in materials where testing
was not conducted.
3. Changing Regulatory Constraints
The regulations concerning hazardous materials are constantly changing, including the interpretations of
the regulations by the local and national regulating agencies. Should the regulations or their interpretation
be changed from our current understanding, EHS-Alaska, Inc. reserves the right to amend or revise its
conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations.
Seward Jesse Lee Home 66 Section 02 26 00
Page 18 of 18
APPENDIX A
Asbestos Bulk Sample
Field Survey Data Sheets
and
Laboratory Reports
67
!-LD 2 2020
EH&A ask., Inc.
EHS-ALASKA, INC, 11901 Business Blvd., Suite 208,Eagle River,AK 99577
o � rj uC ALASKA (907)694-1383 • (907) 694-1382 fax
L�111J INCORPORATED e-mail• ehsak(&ehs-alaska.com
PROJECT NO: PROJECT NAME: FACILITY: COLLECTION
DATE:
7760-01 Seward Jesse Lee Home Jesse Lee Home 2-13-2020
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
ANALYSIS ®PLM BULK ❑PLM DUST ❑TEM BULK TYPE: TURNAROUND: DISPOSAL: QUANTITY
REQUESTED: ❑LEAD DUST ❑LEAD TCLP ❑LEAD PPM ®ASBESTOS 4 DAYS NORMAL 48
❑TEM MICROVAC DUST(ASTM 5756) ❑LEAD
IATL SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS:
COLLECTED BY(signaturef, SELECTED LABORATORY
LAB: RETURN A SIGNED COPY OF THIS FORM WITH
Robert French THE FINAL REPORT TO EHS-ALASKA,INC.
PRINTED NAME SAMPLES ACCEPTED BY
1564 88IMP-0028 See sample location drawing for more detailed explanation of exact
CERT# / AHERA# DATErrIME {1 ._ locations.
FedEx L l
ANALYST'S SIGNATURD
SHIPPING METHOD .-J_
7777 7582 5286 �• -� �� {"
COURIER(signature) DXTE/L T?-,b 1,1h^ /�
DATE/TIME Feb 14,2020,11:00 Vn
N
FIELD SURVEY DATA
EHS SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, LOCATION/COMMENTS RESULTS
(COLOR, MATERIAL TYPE,LAYERS,FRIABILITY) (INCLUDING PHOTO/XREF) FOR EHS-ALAS
LAB ID NO USE ONLY
JLH0220-A01 Fiberboard,probably from ceiling Balto Hall, Basement, Maint shop, Photo 394
JLH0220-AO2 Fiberboard,from walls of stair tower Balto Hall,Basement,East Stairs,Photo 395 NC)i--p-
J � z 1-/
JLH0220-AO3 Fiberboard,from walls of stair tower Balto Hall, Basement, West Stairs,Photo464 poi e
`Jcn, f�ifc!
JLH0220-AO4 Fiberboard,ceiling at light Balto Hall,Basement, West Stairs,Photo455 0,
Q :7 11
.5 ;
JLH0220-AO5 Stucco(concrete) Balto Hall,Exterior, SE Comer,/Photo 505& VC4,-e
�Q "I , ) 1. 506
J . — , L j
JLH0220-AO6 Stucco patch at crack Balto Hall,Exterior, SE Corner,Photo 505& Po,-.e
506 Pe f-ea�l
JLH0220-AO7 Stucco(concrete) Balto Hall,Exterior, SW Corner,Photo 511 Pav-
a "I
, 2 0-I✓Ae-,?1e_1
JLH0220-A08 Tar paper under stucco Balto Hall,Exterior, SW Corner,Photo 513 fu0,7 Ie
vd-e'd-te-111
JLH0220-AO9 Tar paper under stucco Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South side, comer N C)e
6 Q -1 V 3 of S wing to E wing, Photo 540
3
Page q$of 4
RECEIVED
r FEB 2 7 2020
IE]H[&A alai Inc.
EHS-ALASKA, INC. 11901 Business Blvd.,Suite 208,Eagle River,AK 99577
o rj uC ALASKA (907) 694-1383 • (907) 694-1382 fax
L111J INCORPORATED e-mail • ehsak(&ehs-alaska.com
PROJECT NO: PROJECT NAME: FACILITY: COLLECTION
DATE:
7760-01 Seward Jesse Lee Home Jesse Lee Home 2-13-2020
FIELD SURVEY DATA
EHS SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, LOCATION/COMDIENTS RESULTS
(COLOR, NIATERIAL TYPE,LAYERS,FRIABILITY) (INCLUDING PHOTO/XREF) FOR EHS-ALASKA
LAB ID NO USE ONLY
JLH0220-A10 Stucco(concrete) Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South side,corner kou,P_
of S wing to E wing, Photo 540
JLH0220-A11 Tar paper under stucco Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South side,by N��
r r� 7 +^J Stairs, Photo 542&543
O v ;J tJ
JLH0220-Al2 Stucco(concrete) Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South side,by j.t'o—e-
r.`�
C1 �J ', 3 � J Stairs, Photo 542&543 d
_ �
JLH0220-A13 Green mineral coated thick tar paper Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior,West side,At PUo2
window patch at SW Corner,Photo 550 1)eA"A'/
JLH0220-A14 Green mineral coated thick tar paper Jewel Guard Hall, Exterior, West side, No
I'v
Q y 3 , ;; W I'14 P'. I )�„- %a 61", Collapsed Roof over stair to Bsmt,Photo 555 1J1�oo��Pl�tJfrt`
9 �J .1 /r�/p CMS' IL.
JLH0220-A15 Marlite Balto Hall, at west stairs, 1st floor,Photo 42, 1./V"e
similar. v �
JLH0220-A16 Jute backed linoleum,greenish Balto Hall,west hall, lst floor,Photo 585&6 /Jciie
JLH0220-A17 Brown VAT&black mastic Balto Hall, South dining area, 1st floor,Photo �,7`70 L ly
10 similar. ND W.-k
JLH0220-A18 Tar paper under plywood Balto Hall, 1st floor,Kitchen,Photo 587 77e2e
Cl `i I -
JLH0220-A 19 Crepe paper with tar paper Balto Hail,2nd floor,room over kitchen at
I. side walls to attic space. Photo 590r e �
onyll
JLH0220-A20 Cardboard holding up crepe paper. Balto Hall,2nd floor,room over kitchen at Uc y
side walls to attic space. Photo 590
JLH0220-A21 Fibrous paper,with light yellow mastic Balto Hall,2nd floor,east side near hall, vooe
a . Photo 591
JLH0220-A22 Fibrous paper,with light yellow mastic Balto Hall,2nd floor,west side center,Photo Pt 4tAL-
592 adzzf'I
i a '.i 4 "
o laqw
JLH0220-A23 Fiberboard ceiling Balto Hall,2nd floor,west side center,Photo A/CcO'
64
Page(of 4
FEB 2 1' 2020
EHS,A &., Inc.
EHS-ALAS11Q0, !NC. 11901 Business Blvd., Suite 208,Eagle River,AK 99577
oA
rj M ALASKA (907) 694-1383 • (907) 694-1382 fax
L/11J INCORPORATED e-mail - ehsakaehs-alaska.com
r77160-01
JECT NO: PROJECT NAME: FACILITY: COLLECTION
DATE:
Seward Jesse Lee Home Jesse Lee Home 2-13-2020
FIELD SURVEY DATA
EHS SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, LOCATION/COAIAIENTS RESULTS
FOR EHS-AL ASKA
USE ONLY
(COLOR, DIATERIALTYPE,LAYERS,FRIABILITY) (INCLUDING PHOTO/XREF) Y
LAB ID NO Y
JLH0220-A24 Hardboard at stairs Jewel Guard Hall,at bottom of stairs to West 0', °�c
!h 0 ,-, Arcade. Photo 77 similar. G{,I r y fc'i1I
JLH0220-A25 Brown Jute backed Linoleum,cream mastic Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st floor,NE wing,SE
L1 is ' portion. Photo 596
JLH0220-A26 Fiber board,under plaster at column Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,ona��
6,Q -i + ,! center north column. Photo 602
.J . �t
JLH0220-A27 Skim coat of plaster Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,on Pp0'e,
�- 1 4 center north column. Photo 602 ,!�1&�
J _
JLH0220-A28 Scratch coat of plaster Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,on P'C"^2.
a I center north column. Photo 602 P41i-eef/
64
JLH0220-A29 Cream&brown Jute backed Linoleum, Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,near �C -
cream mastic center north column. Photo 6031'
!'� "t �� l= �`� •�l S�tf'1�!C.! k/ vna a'�1 G
JLH0220-A30 1/4"gypsum board,plaster scratch coat, Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,NE
plaster skim coat,paint Corner at light hole. Photo 604
ah3toe*s
JLH0220-A31 1/4 inch gypsum board Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,remnant 0"P_
!, •y_,3 J at ceiling. Photo 605
J
JLH0220-A32 1/4 inch gypsum board Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,remnant PC V-c
Cy m, at beam. Photo 605 O plhzclvzll
JLH0220-A33 Joint compound Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,NE wing,West Z.O�o
side at light hole. Patching a hole, light
removed.Photo 607
JLH0220-A34 Shower Pan concrete Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,2nd layer of
concrete,etc.at raised showers,center wing. v,�.,�u/
rj a y Photo 612
JLH0220-A35 Shower Pan concrete Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,2nd layer of P0,V
concrete,etc. at raised showers,center wing.
D elf
Photo 610
JLH0220-A36 Brown Jute backed Linoleum,mastic,tar Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st floor,near west door,
paper Photo 617
!`t1 'I ad-3
JLH0220-A37 Tar paper,loose Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,near west door, tXAe
9 :'_ 3 v Probably from wall?Or ceiling. Photo 619 p - -�l
Page�Oof 4
FEB 2 7 2020
lE+IH[.S,-Alaska, 1,,:.
EHS-ALASKA, INC, 11901 Business Blvd.,Suite 208,Eagle River,AK 99577
o � rj uC ALASKA (907) 694-1383 -(907) 694-1382 fax
INCORPORATED e-mail- ehsaWi)ehs-alaska.com
PROJECT NO: PROJECT NAME: FACILITY: COLLECTION
DATE:
7760-01 Seward Jesse Lee Home Jesse Lee Home 2-13-2020
FIELD SURVEY DATA
EHS SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, LOCATION/CONINIENTS RESULTS
(COLOR, MATERIAL TYPE,LAYERS,FRIABILITY) (INCLUDING PHOTO/XREF) FOR EHS-AL USE ONLY ASKA
LAB ID NO Y
Y
JLH0220-A38 Plaster,scratch&finish Jewel Guard Hall, 1st floor,by 1st window Poop
south of hall. Photo 620 1)e;"ed----1
JLH0220-A39 Brown Jute backed Linoleum,white mastic Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st floor,west stairs,Photo ctnZ
J 622
JLH0220-A40 Plaster Remnant at side of stairs Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st floor,west stairs,Photo k•o,,�
Ei 1 7_ 3 0 _ 624 ��e�tctA
JLH0220-A41 Red shower concrete lining Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor,2nd layer of
concrete,etc.at raised showers, center wing.
_ • w Photo 623 '
JLH0220-A42 Plaster,scratch&finish Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor,NE Corner of pat2
(� 'I_ Chapel. Photo 625 odi!.Je"/
JLH0220-A43 Brown 9x9 floor tile,Black mastic Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor,bathroom of SE 3 ':?oCJ4
F, corner Room. Photo 627 i f'I Ie,
JLH0220-A44 Y Cream&brown,Jute backed linoleum Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor,room by
a .1 ". '_ Chimney. Photo 628 17�fr �e
JLH0220-A45 Cardboard holder of insulation Jewel Guard Hall,3rd floor,attic joists at
center section. Photo 632
JLH0220-A46 Fiberboard Jewel Guard Hall,3rd floor,N side by
window center section. Photo 633
JLH0220-A47 Plaster,scratch&finish Jewel Guard Hall,3rd floor,N side by t)pI'V,
window center section. Phot 633
6 ' a .; h g
JLH0220-A48 Plaster,scratch&finish Jewel Guard Hall,2nd floor,NE corner of W (Jo'v
V J wing. Photo 621 c!
aftt l
END
Page74 of 4
0 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Lab No.: 6971822 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,Basement,Maint
Client No.: JLH0220-AO1 Client Description: Fiberboard,Probably From Ceiling Shop
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971823 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,Basement,East Stairs
Client No.: JLH0220-AO2 Client Description: Fiberboard,From Walls Of Stair Tower Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971824 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,Basement,West Stairs
Client No.: JLH0220-AO3 Client Description: Fiberboard,From Walls Of Stair Tower Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971825 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,Basement,West Stairs
Client No.: JLH0220-AO4 Client Description: Fiberboard,Ceiling At Light Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 0.25 Chrysotde 99 Cellulose 0.75
-Note:-Probable surface contamination only.-
Lab No.: 6971826 Analyst Observation: Grey Stucco Location: Balto Hall,Exterior, SE Corner
Client No.: JLH0220-AO5 Client Description: Stucco(Concrete) Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971827 Analyst Observation: Grey Stucco Location: Balto Hall,Exterior, SE Corner
Client No.: JLH0220-AO6 Client Description: Stucco Patch At Crack Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - ��' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:11 Page 42of 15
0 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971828 Analyst Observation: Grey Stucco Location: Balto Hall,Exterior, SW Corner
Client No.: JLH0220-AO7 Client Description: Stucco(Concrete) Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971829 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Balto Hall,Exterior, SW Corner
Client No.: JLH0220-AO8 Client Description: Tar Paper Under Stucco Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 90 Cellulose 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971830 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South
Client No.: JLH0220-AO9 Client Description: Tar Paper Under Stucco Side, Corner Of S Wing To E Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 90 Cellulose 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971831 Analyst Observation: Grey Stucco Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South
Client No.: JLH0220-Al0 Client Description: Stucco(Concrete) Side, Corner Of S Wing To E Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971832 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South
Client No.: JLH0220-Al1 Client Description: Tar Paper Under Stucco Side,By Stairs
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 95 Cellulose 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971833 Analyst Observation: Grey Stucco Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior, South
Client No.: JLH0220-Al2 Client Description: Stucco(Concrete) Side,By Stairs
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - ��' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:11 Page Nof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971834 Analyst Observation: Black/Green Shingle Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior,West
Client No.: JLH0220-Al3 Client Description: Green Mineral Coated Thick Tar Paper Side,At Window Patch At SW Corner
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 15 Cellulose 85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971835 Analyst Observation: Black/Green Shingle Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior,West
Client No.: JLH0220-Al4 Client Description: Green Mineral Coated Thick Tar Paper Side, Collapsed Roof Over Stair To Bsmt
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 15 Cellulose 85
Lab No.: 6971835(L2) Analyst Observation: Black Tar Location: Jewel Guard Hall,Exterior,West
Client No.: JLH0220-Al4 Client Description: Green Mineral Coated Thick Tar Paper Side, Collapsed Roof Over Stair To Bsmt
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC].2 Chrysotile 10 Cellulose 88.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971836 Analyst Observation: Beige Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,at West Stairs, 1st
Client No.: JLH0220-Al5 Client Description: Marlite Floor
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 99 Cellulose 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971837 Analyst Observation: Grey Vinyl Sheet Flooring Location: Balto Hall,West Hall, 1 st Floor
Client No.: JLH0220-Al6 Client Description: Jute Backed Linoleum,Greenish Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971838 Analyst Observation: Tan Floor Tile Location: Balso Hall, South Dining Area,
Client No.: JLH0220-Al7 Client Description: Brown VAT And Black Mastic 1st Floor
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 4.7 Chrysotile None Detected 95.3
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - �' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:11 Page Hof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Lab No.: 6971838(L2) Analyst Observation: Black Mastic Location: Balso Hall, South Dining Area,
Client No.: JLH0220-Al7 Client Description: Brown VAT And Black Mastic 1 st Floor
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 2 Cellulose 98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971839 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Balto Hall, 1 st Floor,Kitchen
Client No.: JLH0220-Al8 Client Description: Tar Paper Under Plywood Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 7.7 Chrysotde 65 Cellulose 27.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971840 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,Room
Client No.: JLH0220-Al9 Client Description: Crepe Paper With Tar Paper Over Kitchen At Side Walls To Attic Space
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 98 Cellulose 2
Lab No.: 6971840(L2) Analyst Observation: Tan Plaster Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,Room
Client No.: JLH0220-Al9 Client Description: Crepe Paper With Tar Paper Over Kitchen At Side Walls To Attic Space
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971841 Analyst Observation: Tan Paper Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,Room
Client No.: JLH0220-A20 Client Description: Cardboard Holding Up Crepe Paper Over Kitchen At Side Walls To Attic Space
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 98 Cellulose 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971842 Analyst Observation: Grey Paper Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,East Side
Client No.: JLH0220-A21 Client Description: Fibrous Paper,With Light Yellow Mastic Near Hall
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 95 Cellulose 5
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - �' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Hof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA]FL Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASSI:s-Ios TEsru c-LAL30RATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Lab No.: 6971842(L2) Analyst Observation: Light Yellow Mastic Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,East Side
Client No.: JLH0220-A21 Client Description: Fibrous Paper,With Light Yellow Mastic Near Hall
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971843 Analyst Observation: Tan Paper Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,West Side
Client No.: JLH0220-A22 Client Description: Fibrous Paper,With Light Yellow Mastic Center
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 96 Cellulose 4
Lab No.: 6971843(L2) Analyst Observation: Tan Mastic Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,West Side
Client No.: JLH0220-A22 Client Description: Fibrous Paper,With Light Yellow Mastic Center
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Cellulose 99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971844 Analyst Observation: Beige Fiberboard Location: Balto Hall,2nd Floor,West Side
Client No.: JLH0220-A23 Client Description: Fiberboard Ceiling Center
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971845 Analyst Observation: Beige Fiberboard Location: Jewel Guard Hall,At Bottom Of
Client No.: JLH0220-A24 Client Description: Hardboard At Stairs Stairs To West Arcade
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 0.25 Chrysotde 98 Cellulose 1.75
Note: Probable surface contamination only.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By: ��
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020 Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - i �' £� _ `-- V\-. Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Hof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971846 Analyst Observation: Tan Vinyl Sheet Flooring Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A25 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,Cream Wing, SE Portion
Mastic Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 35 Cellulose 65
Insufficient mastic to analyze--------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971847 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A26 Client Description: Fiberboard,Under Plaster At Column Wing, On Center North Column
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971848 Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A27 Client Description: Skim Coat Of Plaster Wing, On Center North Column
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971849 Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A28 Client Description: Scratch Coat Of Plaster Wing, On Center North Column
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971850 Analyst Observation: Lt Yellow/Tan Vinyl Sheet Flooring Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A29 Client Description: Cream And Brown Jute Backed Wing, On Center North Column
Linoleum,Cream Mastic Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 30 Cellulose 70
Insufficient mastic to analyze
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - ��' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Hof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971851 Analyst Observation: Lt Tan Drywall Location: Jewel Guard Hall, I st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A30 Client Description: 1/4" Gypsum Board,Plaster Scratch Coat, Wing,NE Corner At Light Hole
Plaster Skim Coat,Paint Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 20 Cellulose 80
Note: No joint compound present
Lab No.: 6971851(L2) Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, I st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A30 Client Description: 1/4" Gypsum Board,Plaster Scratch Coat, Wing,NE Corner At Light Hole
Plaster Skim Coat,Paint Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Lab No.: 6971851(L3) Analyst Observation: Tan Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, I st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A30 Client Description: 1/4" Gypsum Board,Plaster Scratch Coat, Wing,NE Corner At Light Hole
Plaster Skim Coat,Paint Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971852 Analyst Observation: Lt Tan Drywall Location: Jewel Guard Hall, I st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A31 Client Description: 1/4 Inch Gypsum Board Wing,Remnant At Ceiling
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 30 Cellulose 70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971853 Analyst Observation: Tan Board Location: Jewel Guard Hall, I st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A32 Client Description: 1/4 Inch Gypsum Board Wing,Remnant At Beam
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - �' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Hof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971854 Analyst Observation: Off-White Joint Compound Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A33 Client Description: Joint Compound Wing,West Side At Light Hole. Patching A
Hole,Light Removed.
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 2.0 Chrysotile None Detected 98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971855 Analyst Observation: Grey Concrete Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,2nd
Client No.: JLH0220-A34 Client Description: Shower Pan Concrete Layer Of Concrete,Etc.At Raised Showers,
Center Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971856 Analyst Observation: Grey Concrete Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,2nd
Client No.: JLH0220-A35 Client Description: Shower Pan Concrete Layer Of Concrete,Etc.At Raised Showers,
Center Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971857 Analyst Observation: Tan/Brown Vinyl Sheet Flooring Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,Near
Client No.: JLH0220-A36 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,Mastic,Tar West Door
Paper Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 20 Cellulose 80
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971857(L2) Analyst Observation: Tan Mastic Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1st Floor,Near
Client No.: JLH0220-A36 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,Mastic,Tar West Door
Paper Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - ��' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Vof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Lab No.: 6971857(L3) Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,Near
Client No.: JLH0220-A36 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,Mastic,Tar West Door
Paper Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 80 Cellulose 20
Analyzed by Tiffanx Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971858 Analyst Observation: Black Tar Paper Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,Near
Client No.: JLH0220-A37 Client Description: Tar Paper,Loose West Door,Probably From Wall?Or Ceiling
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 95 Cellulose 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971859 Analyst Observation: Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,By
Client No.: JLH0220-A38 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish 1st Window South Of Hall
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Hair 99
Lab No.: 6971859(L2) Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,By
Client No.: JLH0220-A38 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish 1 st Window South Of Hall
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffanx Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971860 Analyst Observation: Brown Vinyl Sheet Flooring Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,West
Client No.: JLH0220-A39 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,White Mastic Stairs
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 20 Cellulose 80
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - �' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page Vof 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA]FL Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBLs-Ios TEsru c-LAL30RATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Lab No.: 6971860(L2) Analyst Observation: White Mastic Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,West
Client No.: JLH0220-A39 Client Description: Brown Jute Back Linoleum,White Mastic Stairs
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971861 Analyst Observation: Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall, 1 st Floor,West
Client No.: JLH0220-A40 Client Description: Plaster Remnant At Side Of Stairs Stairs
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Hair 99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971862 Analyst Observation: Red Concrete Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,2nd
Client No.: JLH0220-A41 Client Description: Red Shower Concrete Lining Layer Of Concrete,Etc.At Raised Showers,
Center Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971863 Analyst Observation: Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A42 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish Corner Of Chapel
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Hair 99
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971863(L2) Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A42 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish Corner Of Chapel
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By: ��
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020 Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - i �' £� - `-- V\-. Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page M of 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA L Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEsTos TEs-ri.Nc;LAL30RA-IOIZIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971864 Analyst Observation: Brown Floor Tile Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,
Client No.: JLH0220-A43 Client Description: Brown 9x9 Floor Tile,Black Mastic Bathroom Of SE Corner Room
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
PC 3.3 Chrysotde None Detected 96.7
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971864(L2) Analyst Observation: Black Mastic Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,
Client No.: JLH0220-A43 Client Description: Brown 9x9 Floor Tile,Black Mastic Bathroom Of SE Corner Room
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971865 Analyst Observation: Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,
Client No.: JLH0220-A44 Client Description: Cream And Brown,Jute Backed Bathroom Of SE Corner Room
Linoleum Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Hair 99
Analyzed by Tiffany Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971865(L2) Analyst Observation: White Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,
Client No.: JLH0220-A44 Client Description: Cream And Brown,Jute Backed Bathroom Of SE Corner Room
Linoleum Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100
Analyzed by TifLmy-Lowe 3/6/20.
Lab No.: 6971866 Analyst Observation: Tan Insulation Location: Jewel Guard Hall,3rd Floor,Attic
Client No.: JLH0220-A45 Client Description: Cardboard Holder Of Insulation Joists At Center Section
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By:
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020_ Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - ��' � �� _ - _ Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page $?of 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA]FL Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASSI:s-Ios TEsru c-LAL30RATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782 -PLM Rev#3,3/12/2020
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971867 Analyst Observation: Tan Fiberboard Location: Jewel Guard Hall,3rd Floor,N
Client No.: JLH0220-A46 Client Description: Fiberboard Side By Window Center Section
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 100 Cellulose None Detected
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971868 Analyst Observation: Lt Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,3rd Floor,N
Client No.: JLH0220-A47 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish Side By Window Center Section
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Note: No additional layers observed.
------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lab No.: 6971869 Analyst Observation: Lt Grey Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A48 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish Corner Of W Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected 1 Hair 99
Lab No.: 6971869(L2) Analyst Observation: White/Black Plaster Location: Jewel Guard Hall,2nd Floor,NE
Client No.: JLH0220-A48 Client Description: Plaster, Scratch And Finish Corner Of W Wing
Facility:
Percent Asbestos: Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: Percent Non-Fibrous Material:
None Detected None Detected 100
Analyzed by Rebecca Hargrove 3/12/20.
Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.
Date Received: 2/17/2020 Approved By: ��
Date Analyzed: 02/20/2020 Frank E.Ehrenfeld,III
Signature: - i �' £� - `-- V\-. Laboratory Director
Analyst: Ellen Smith
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page $1 of 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA IL Email: customerservice@iatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEs'roS TESTING LABORATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782-PLM
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
Appendix to Analytical Report
Customer Contact: Ellen Cloudy
Method:40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763,interim method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples,and USEPA 600,R93-116 as
needed.
This appendix seeks to promote greater understanding of any observations,exceptions,special instructions,or circumstances that the laboratory needs to communicate to
the client concerning the above samples.The information below is used to help promote your ability to make the most informed decisions for you and your customers.
Please note the following points of contact for any questions you may have.
1ATL Customer Service: customerservice@iatl.com
1ATL Office Manager:wchampion@iatl.com
1ATL Account Representative:Semih Kocahasan
Sample Login Notes: See Batch Sheet Attached
Sample Matrix: Bulk Building Materials
Exceptions Noted: See Following Pages
General Terms,Warrants,Limits,Qualifiers:
General information about iATL capabilities and client/laboratory relationships and responsibilities are spelled out in iATL policies that are listed at www.iATL.com and it
our Quality Assurance Manual per ISO 17025 standard requirements.The information therein is a representation of iATL definitions and policies for turnaround times,
sample submittal,collection media,blank definitions,quantification issues and limit of detection,analytical methods and procedures,sub-contracting policies,results
reporting options,fees,terms,and discounts,confidentiality,sample archival and disposal,and data interpretation.
iATL warrants the test results to be of a precision normal for the type and methodology employed for each sample submitted.iATL disclaims any other warrants,
expressed or implied,including warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability.iATL accepts no legal responsibility for the purpose for which
the client uses test results.Any analytical work performed must be governed by our Standard Terms and Conditions.Prices,methods and detection limits maybe changed
without notification.Please contact your Customer Service Representative for the most current information.
This confidential report relates only to those item(s)tested and does not represent an endorsement by NIST-NVLAP,AIHA LAP LLC,or any agency of local,state or
province governments nor of any agency of the U.S.government.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full,without written approval of the laboratory.
Information Pertinent to this Report:
Analysis by US EPA 600 93-116:Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy(PLM).
Certifications:
• NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0
• NYSDOH-ELAP No. 11021
• AIHA-LAP,LLC No. 100188
Quantification at<0.25%by volume is possible with this method.(PC)Indicates Stratified Point Count Method performed.(PC-Trace)means that asbestos was detected
but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting regimen.PC Trace represents a<0.25%amount.Analysis includes all distinct separable layers in accordance with EPA
600 Method.If not reported or otherwise noted,layer is either not present or the client has specifically requested that it not be analyzed(ex.analyze until positive
instructions).Small asbestos fibers may be missed by PLM due to resolution limitations of the optical microscope.Therefore,PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting
asbestos in non-friable organically bound(NOB)materials.Quantitative transmission electron microscopy(TEM)is currently the only method that can pronounce
materials as non-asbestos containing.
Analytical Methodology Alternatives:Your initial request for analysis may not have accounted for recent advances in regulatory requirements or advances in technology
that are routinely used in similar situations for other qualified projects.You may have the option to explore additional analysis for further information.Below are a few
options,listed as the matrix followed by the appropriate methodology.Also included are links to more information on our website.
Bulk Building Materials that are Non-Friable Organically Bound(NOB)by Gravimetric Reduction techniques employing PLM and TEM:FLAP 198.6(PLM-NOB),
FLAP 198.4(TEM-NOB)
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page P1 of 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA IL Email: customerservice@iad.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBEs,roS TESTING LABORATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782-PLM
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
Loose Fill Vermiculite Insulation,Attic Insulation,Zonolite(copyright),etc.:US EPA 600 R-4/004(multi-tiered analytical process)
Sprayed On Insulation/Fireproofing with Vermiculite(SOF-V):FLAP 198.8(PLM-SOF-V)
Soil,sludge,sediment,aggregate,and like materials analyzed for asbestos or other elongated mineral particles(ex.erionite,etc.):ASTM D7521,CARB 435,and other
options available
Asbestos in Surface Dust according to one of ASTM's Methods(very dependent on sampling collection technique—by TEM):ASTM D 5755,D5756,or D6480
Various other asbestos matrices(air,water,etc.)and analytical methods are available.
Disclaimers/Qualifiers:
There maybe some samples in this project that have a"NOTE:"associated with a sample result.We use added disclaimers or qualifiers to inform the client about
something that requires further explanation.Here is a list with highlighted disclaimers that may be pertinent to this project.For a full explanation of these and other
disclaimers,please inquire at customerservice@iatl.com.
1)Note:No mastic provided for analysis.
2)Note:Insufficient mastic provided for analysis.
3)Note:Insufficient material provided for analysis.
4)Note:Insufficient sample provided for QC reanalysis.
5)Note:Different material than indicated on Sample Log/Description.
6)Note:Sample not submitted.
7)Note:Attached to asbestos containing material.
8)Note:Received wet.
9)Note:Possible surface contamination.
10)Note:Not building material. 1%threshold may not apply.
11)Note:Recommend TEM-NOB analysis as per EPA recommendations.
12)Note:Asbestos detected but not quantifiable.
13)Note:Multiple identical samples submitted,only one analyzed.
14)Note:Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116.Point Counting detection limit at 0.080%.
15)Note:Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116.Point Counting detection limit at 0.125%.
16)Note:This sample contains>10%vermiculite mineral.See Appendix for Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis.
Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis:
Several analytical protocols exist for the analysis of asbestos in vermiculite.These analytical approaches vary depending upon the nature of the vermiculite mineral being
tested(e.g.un-processed gange,homogeneous exfoliated books of mica,or mixed mineral composites).Please contact your client representative for pricing and turnaround
time options available.
iATL recommends initial testing using the EPA 600/R-93/116 method.This method is specifically designed for the analysis of asbestos in bulk building materials.It
provides an acceptable starting point for primary screening of vermiculite for possible asbestos.
Results from this testing may be inconclusive.EPA suggests proceeding to a multi-tiered analysis involving wet separation techniques in conjunction with PLM and TEM
gravimetric analysis(EPA 600/R-04/004).
For New York State customers,NYSDOH requires disclaimers and qualifiers for various vermiculite containing samples that direct analysis via ELAP198.6 and
ELAP198.8 for samples that contain>10%vermiculite mineral where ELAP198.6 may be used to evaluate the asbestos content of the material.However,any test result
using ELAP198.6 will be reported with the following disclaimer:"ELAP198.6 method does not remove vermiculite and may underestimate the level of asbestos present in
a sample containing>10%vermiculite."
Further information on this method and other vermiculite and asbestos issues can be found at the following:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry(ATSDR)
www.atsdr.cdc.gov,United States Geological Survey(USGS)www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/,US EPA www.epa.gov/asbestos.The USEPA also has an informative
brochure"Current Best Practices for Vermiculite Attic Insulation"EPA 747FO3001 May 2003,that may assist the health and remediation professional.
The following is a summary of the analytical process outlines in the EPA 600/R-04/004 Method:
1)Analytical Step/Method: Initial Screening by PLM,EPA 60OR-93/116
Requirements/Comments: Minimum of 0.1 g of sample.—0.25%LOQ for most samples.
2)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique,EPA R-04/004
Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g**of dry sample.Analysis of"Sinks"only.
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page H of 15
9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B
Mt.Laurel,New Jersey 08054
Telephone: 856-231-9449
.iA IL Email: customerservice(oiatl.com
INTERNATIONAL
ASBES'IY]S TESTING LABORATORIES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Client: EHS Alaska Incorporated Report Date: 2/20/2020
11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Report No.: 609782-PLM
Eagle River AK 99577 Project: Seward Jesse Lee Home
Client: EHS511 Project No.: 7760-01
3)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique,EPA R-04/004
Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g**of dry sample.Analysis of"Floats"only.
4)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique,EPA R-04/004
Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g**of dry sample.Analysis of"Sinks"only.
5)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique,EPA R-04/004
Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g**of dry sample.Analysis of"Suspension"only.
LOQ,Limit of Quantitation estimates for mass and volume analyses.
*With advance notice and confirmation by the laboratory.
**Approximately 1 Liter of sample in double-bagged container(-9x6 inch bag of sample).
Dated: 3/12/2020 1:25:12 Page P�of 15
APPENDIX B
2011 Asbestos & Lead
Inspection Report by WEC
87
EWRITE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC .
Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska
Asbestos Inspection Report
Prepared for:
Friends of the Jesse Lee Home, LLC
307 E. Northern Lights Boulevard, Suite 201
Anchorage,AK 99503
Prepared by:
White Environmental Consultants, Inc.
7311 Street, Suite 203
Anchorage,AK 99501
April 4, 2011
88
Contents
Scopeof Work.....................:.........................................................................................................................3
InspectionFindings.. ........................ ..............................................................................................4
Jesse Lee Home-Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM)..............................................................................4
Compliance Recommendations-Asbestos...................................................................................................5
Jesse Lee Home- Lead Containing Paint(LCP)..............................................................................................7
Compliance Recommendations—Lead................................................ .......................................................8
Limitations................................... .........................................................................................................8
Appendices
Appendix A: Bulk Asbestos Analytical Report/Field Collection Forms
Appendix B: Lead Sample Results/Field Collection Forms
Appendix C: lnspectors'Certifications
2
89
Scope of Work
On March 15, 2011 White Environmental Consultants Inc. (WEC) performed an asbestos inspection of
the Jesse Lee Home located in Seward,Alaska. WEC also collected paint samples to determine if any
lead containing paints were presents at the property.
The purpose of this survey is to provide our client, Friends of the Jesse Lee Home, with professional
guidance from which they may fulfill all relevant environmental and worker health and safety
obligations through compliance with applicable Environmental Protection Agency(EPA),Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), and the Federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA)and the Alaska's Department of Occupational Safety and Health (AKOSH)
regulations during renovation activities conducted at the aforementioned property.
The interior and exterior of the building was inspected and/or sampled for asbestos containing materials
(ACM)and suspected lead-containing paint(LCP)to determine specific renovation and disposal activities
required if these materials are present.
WEC collected 42 samples consisting of 46 layers of suspected asbestos containing materials(ACM).
Suspect materials identified and sampled include:
a. Thermal System Insulation—Piping and Boilers
b. Plaster
C. Skim Coat
d. Floor Tile
e. Floor Tile Mastic
f. Exterior Stucco Style Texture
g. Sheet Vinyl
h. Window Glazing
i. Electrical Wiring Insulation
j. Boiler Gasket
k. Boiler Insulation
I. Tank Insulation
M. Silver Seal
The materials listed above are an inventory of suspect ACM found throughout the Jewel Guard Hall and
Balto Building which together are known as the Jesse Lee Home; sample results by material will be
addressed in the findings section of the report.
WEC collected 5 samples of suspect lead containing paints from various locations throughout the Jewel
Guard Hall and Balto Building. The purpose of the paint sampling was to characterize suspect paints to
determine the need, if any,of lead compliance measures during the renovation process. Analysis was
performed by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy EPA Method SW846-7420,
3
90
Inspection Findings
Jesse Lee Home - Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM)
WEC personnel collected 42 samples for a total of 46 discrete layers of suspected asbestos containing
building materials from the Jewel Guard Hall and Salto Building located in Seward,Alaska. Of the 46
sample layers collected, 24 samples were found to contain asbestos. A summary of the materials
containing asbestos is shown below and is described as positive along with the percentage of asbestos
contained in the product.
SAMPLE ASBESTOS
I D# MATERIAL. LOCATION CONTENT
Thermal System
049-09 Jewel Guard Hall, 2"d Floor, East Side by Chimney 40%
Insulation- Line
Thermal System
049-10 Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd Floor,West Side 40%
Insulation- Debris
Thermal System � o
049-13 Jewel Guard Hall, 1 Floor,West Side, on Floor 40%
Insulation -Debris
049-16a Floor Tile Jewel Guard Hall, 1" Floor Hallway 4%
Thermal System
049-17 Jewel Guard Hall, 1st Floor, Center at South Wall 40%
Insulation- Line
049-18 Window Glazing Jewel Guard Hall, 1"Floor, East Wing 4%
Thermal System
049-19 Jewel Guard Hall, 1st Floor, East Wing 40%
Insulation-Line
049-20a Floor Tile Jewel Guard Hall, 1st Floor, East Wing 4%
Thermal System
049-21 Jewel Guard Hall, Basement, West Side 20%
Insulation-Elbow
Thermal System
049-22 Jewel Guard Hall, Basement,West Side 40%
Insulation- Line
049 23 Thermal System Jewel Guard Hall, Basement,West Side on 40/
Insulation -Debris Ground o
4
91
SAMPLE ASBESTOS
I D# MATERIAL LOCATION CONTENT
Thermal System
049-24 Jewel Guard Hall, Basement, East Side 30%
Insulation- Elbow
Thermal System
049-25 Jewel Guard Hall, Basement, East Side 40%
Insulation- Line
049 26 Thermal System Balto Building, 2"d Floor,West Side 40%
Insulation- Line
049-27a Floor Tile Balto Building, 1st Floor,Southwest Side 4%
049-28 Window Glazing Balto Building, 15t Floor,Southwest Side 3%
049-29a Floor Tile Balto Building, 1'Floor,Southeast Side 4%
049-31 Window Glazing Balto Building, 1'Floor, East Side 5%
Thermal System
049-32 Balto Building, Basement, Under West Stairway 25%
Insulation- Line
Thermal System
049-33 Balto Building, Basement, Under West Stairway 30%
Insulation - Elbow
049-34 Gasket Balto Building, Boiler Room,West Boiler 90%
049-37 Gasket Balto Building, Boiler Room, East Boiler 90%
049-39 Tank Insulation Balto Building, Boiler Room,South Side 50%
049-40 Thermal System Balto Building, Boiler Room,Southeast Side on 30/
Insulation-Debris Floor a
Compliance Recommendations - Asbestos
Gaskets:
Gaskets are considered a Class it non-friable asbestos containing material by the Occupational Health
and Safety Administration (OHSA). Any disturbance of the material should only be performed by state
accredited asbestos abatement personnel. Given the age of the buildings all gaskets should be
considered asbestos containing material.
5
92
Thermal System Insulation: Pipe and Tank Insulation
Thermal system insulation is considered a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) by the EPA
and a Class I friable asbestos containing material by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration
(OHSA). This material has to be removed from the structures prior to renovation or demolition.Any
disturbance of the material should only be performed by state accredited asbestos abatement
personnel. Thermal system insulation was found to be present in the Jewel Guard Hall and Balto
Building. Most of the thermal system insulation in the building is significantly damaged. There is a
minor amount of thermal system insulation left in place on the first,second, and third floors of the
Jewel Guard Hall and first and second floors of the Balto Building. The basements of both the Jewel
Guard Hall and Balto Building have large quantities of asbestos containing thermal system insulation
present that is significantly damaged. Thermal system insulation debris is present on the floors and on
the ground in the basements of both buildings;this contamination is also present in the crawl space
areas. All efforts should be made to secure the basement areas of the Jewel Guard Hall and Balto
Building to ensure that no one can access these areas. Proper postings should be placed at all entrances
to the basement areas of both buildings warning of the asbestos hazard present in these areas. The only
personnel that should be allowed to enter the basement areas are state accredited asbestos abatement
personnel. There is debris on all floors throughout both buildings. All debris at the Jewel Guard Hall and
Salto Building should be assumed to contain both asbestos containing thermal system insulation and
asbestos containing floor tile. This debris should only be disturbed by state accredited asbestos
abatement personnel.
Floor Tile:
Asbestos containing floor tile was found to be present in both the Jewel Guard Hall and Balto Building.
Floor tiles are considered to be a Class II non-friable asbestos containing material by the Occupational
Health and Safety Administration (OHSA). Any disturbance of floor the in the building should only be
performed by state of Alaska certified asbestos abatement personnel. This includes cleaning of debris
that is spread through out the first, second and third floors of the Jewel Guard Hall and first and second
floors of the Balto Building. Most of the asbestos containing floor tile is located on the first floor of the
Balto Building and has been reduced to small pieces by weathering as the building has no windows. EPA
regulations allow the asbestos containing floor tile to remain in place during demolition of the building
however,state certified asbestos workers will still be required to perform all demolition activities and
the entire waste stream must be disposed of as asbestos containing waste.
Window Glaze:
Window glazing is considered to be a non-friable Class II asbestos containing material by the
Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OHSA). Any disturbance of window glazing at the Jesse
Lee Home should only be performed by state of Alaska certified asbestos abatement personnel. Given
the age of the buildings all window glazing should be considered asbestos containing material
6
93
Regulatory Authority
Code of Federal Regulations EPA 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M (NESHAP), §61.145 Standard for demolition
and renovation requires the removal of all Regulated asbestos-containing materials (RACM)from a
facility being demolished or renovated before any activity begins that would break up, dislodge,or
similarly disturb the material or preclude access to the material for subsequent removal. Regulated
asbestos containing material (RACM) is defined as(a)friable asbestos material, (b)Category 1 non-
friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will or has been subjected to
sanding,grinding, cutting, or abrading,or(d)Category it non-friable ACM that has a high probability of
becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on
the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.
EPA 40 CFR 61 Subpart M National Emission Standard for Asbestos requires the removal of regulated
asbestos containing materials prior to the renovation or demolition of a building.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires specific worker training and removal methods for all asbestos
disturbances in renovation and demolition procedures.
Always test building materials before disturbing the material in any way. Disturbance is defined as any
activity that could disrupt the material's matrix that secures asbestos fibers within the material.
Disturbance includes, but is not limited to,sanding,cutting, screwing, and nailing into the substrate.
Jesse Lee Home - Lead Containing Paint (LCP)
WEC personnel collected 5 samples of suspected lead containing painted surfaces from the interior and
exterior of the Jesse Lee Home located in Seward,Alaska.Samples were analyzed by EPA Method
SW846-7420. A summary of the materials paint analyses is shown below.
Client Sample Sampling Location Results, Limit of Detection,
parts per parts per million
ID# million (ppm)Total Lead
(ppm)Total
Lead
049P-01 Jewel Guard Hall, 2nd Floor,Window Trim 220,000 50
049P-02 Jewel Guard Hall, West Entryway, Door Trim 180,000 40
049P-03 Jewel Guard Hall, West Side, Exterior Wall 7,700 42
049P-04 Balto Building,Southwest Side,Window 15,000 48
049P-05 Balto Building, Southeast Side, Exterior Wall 2,800 46
7
94
Compliance Recommendations Y- Lead
All paint samples collected were found to have detectable levels of lead present. During the course of
the visual inspection and sample collection WEC observed that the interior painted surfaces were in
satisfactory condition; no significant flaking or peeling was observed. The exterior of the building is in
fair condition; minor deterioration of some exterior paint is occurring.
The HUD/EPA term "lead-based paint" addresses the layers of paint on an applicable surface having lead
equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cmZ or 5,000 parts per million. The EPA does not indicate any safe levels
of lead on painted components of a waste stream and requires a Toxicity Characteristic Leachate
Procedure (TCLP)test to be performed on the waste stream to determine disposal requirements.
The OSHA Lead-in-Construction standard (29 CFR 1926.62)applies to all construction work where an
employee may be occupationally exposed to any detectable level of lead, including demolition or salvage
of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present. Based on these results OSHA lead
compliance measures need to be implemented for the disturbance of lead containing paints related to
any renovation or demolition.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 "Lead in Construction" has specific requirements when working in the presence of
lead and where there is a potential for employee exposure to airborne lead.
1. Employee training.
2. Employee exposure assessments
3. Lead compliance plan
Limitations
WEC performed an asbestos and lead containing paint inspection of the Jesse Lee Home located in
Seward,Alaska. Other suspect materials discovered during renovation or demolition not covered in this
survey should be assumed to contain asbestos and treated as such until further sampling shows
materials do not contain asbestos.
Non-destructive testing was performed; asbestos-containing materials may exist in areas not accessible
at the time of inspection.
S
95
Appendix A
Bulk Asbestos Analytical Report / Field Collection Forms
96
WHITE
WEC ENVIRONMENTAL HWUf
QONSbTT A1NiTS INQ.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661
FAX: (907)258-8662 Lab Code: 200124-b
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbest®s
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79150
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard.
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client: Friends Of Jesse Lee Home Collection Date: 3/15/2011
Collection By. T.Hubbard
TAT: 5 Day
Analysis By: D.Milton
#Samples: 42 #Layers:46 Analysis Date: 3/21120.1.1
Received By: Waltuch
Project Name/Location: Jesse Lee Home Received Date: 311,512011
Building: Seward,AK
Client ID# WEC iD# Location. Material Layer
049-01 AB11-2597 JG Halll3rd Floor/East Side/By Chimney Floor Tile 1. of 1
ASBESTOS. Homo-
genous Color
None Detected %Other Fibrous Materials: 30% No Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 70%
Cellulose 30%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-02 AB11-2598 JG Hallt3rd Floor/East Side By Chimney Fiber Board 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
None.Detected % Other Fibrous Materials. 979.1 No Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 3%
Cellulose 97%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Laye
049-03 AB11-2599 JG Ha1113rd Floor/East Side By Chimney Plaster/Skim Coat 1 of
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
None.Detected Other Fibrous Materials: 3% No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 97%
Cellulose 3%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material d ayez
049-04 AB11-2600 JG Halfl3rd Floor/Hallway Floor Tile 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
None Detected % Other Fibrous Materials: 30% No Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 70%
Cellulose 30%
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 1 of 10
97
WHITE
WE C ENVIRONMENTAL KWUf
CONSULTANTS
`{ TT T !'y
CON SILL�.A�i.NTS INC.
731 I St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code:200124-0
FAX: (907)258-86.62
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79160
Client Project#: Report By;C.Blianchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material i�ayer
049-05 AB11-2601 JG Halll3rd Floor/Hallway Floor Felt 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo-
enous Color
None Detected % Other Fibrous Materials: 98% 9 No Gray
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 2%
Cellulose 98%
Client ID# WEC.ID# Location Material Layer
049-06 AB11-2602 JG HaIV2nd Floor/East SidelBy Chimney Electrical Insulation 1 of. 1
ASBESTOS Homo-
0 o genous Color
%
None Detected Other Fibrous Materials: 90% nNo
o Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 90%
Clientlb# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-07 AB11-2603 JG HaI112nd FloortEast SidelBy Chimney Floor Tile 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo Color
% Other Fibrous Materials: 30% genous Brown
None Detected
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 70%
Cellulose 30%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-08 AB11-2604 JG Halll2nd Floor/East Side/By Chimney Plaster/Skim Coat 1 of 1
Homo-
ASBESTOS Color
genous
None Detected No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 100%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-09 AB11-2605 JG HaIV2nd FloorlEast Side/By Chimney TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo- Color
Chrys°tile 40/° genous
° %Other Fibrous Materials: 50% No Off-White,
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 1091.
Cellulose 50%
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 2 of 10
98
ENVIRONMENTAL
WE C CONSULTANTS INC. v
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code: 200124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
Bulk Samp[e Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79150.
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard.
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Iayer
049-10 AB11-2606 JG Halll2nd Floor/West Side TSI Debris 1 of
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo-
Chrysotlle 4oio % Other Fibrous Materials: 50% g
enous Color
No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material i,ayer
049-11 AB11-2607 JG Hallf2nd Floor/West Side Floor Tile Debris 1 of t
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
/
None Detected Other Fibrous Materials: 30% No Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 70%
Cellulose 30%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-12 AB11-2608 1st FloorANestEntryway Plaster/Skim Coat 1 of t
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
None Detected No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 100%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-13 AB11-2609 1st FloorlWest SidelOn Floor TSI Debris 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %p Asbestos: 40%u Homo-
0 n genous Color
Chrysotile 4aio %Other Fibrous Materials: 50/ No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-14 AB11-2610 1st FloorMest Stairs Sheet Vinyl 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo Color
% Other Fibrous Materials: 40% genous Brown
None Detected No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 60%
Cellulose 40.
Report Version: 2011,01,13.01 Page 3 of 10
99
�' WHITE
ENVIRONMENTAL. MM fl
® CONSULTANTS
O C N L S
INC.
731 I.St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code: 200124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
hulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project t#:11CSLT-049 Report#:79150
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21i2011
Client 1D# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-15 AB11-2611 West Side/At JG Hall Stucco of t
ASBESTOS Homo-
genous Color
None Detected No Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials 100%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC.ID# Location Material Layer
049-16 AB11-2612A JG HalV1 st Floor Hallway Floor Tile
ASBESTOS I %Asbestos: 4%a Homo-
genous Color
Chrysotile 4% Brown
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials' 96%
None Detected
Client lD# WEC IQ# Location Material Layer
049=1.6 AB11-2612B JG Hall11 st Floor Hallway Floor Tile Mastic 2 of 2
ASBESTOS Homo- Color
%Other Fibrous Materials: <.1% 9enous
None Detected No Black
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 100%
cellulose «%
Client 1D# WEC ID# Location Material I ayer
049-17 AB11-2613 JG HalVst Floor/Center At South Wall TSI-Line 1 of. 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo-
genous Color
Chrysotile 40% %Other Fibrous Materials., 50% No. Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-18 AB11-2614 JG HaIV1 st Floor/East Wing Window Glazing 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 4% Homo-
genous Color
I. Chrysotile 4% White
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 96%
None Detected
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 4 of 10
100
WHITE
WE C ENVIRONMENTAL ah,
CONSULTANTS ULTANTS INC.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code: 200124-0
FAX. (907)258-8662
Bulk Sample. Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11CSLT-049 Report#:79.15Q
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Laren
049-19 AB11-2615 JG Halllist FloorlEast Wing TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo-
Color
Chrysotile 40% % Other Fibrous Materials: 50% genoous Oft-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 50%
Client[D# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-20 AB11-2616A JG Ha[Ulst Floor/East Wing Floor Tile 1 of 2
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 4% Homo- Color
Chrysotile q°/, Homo-
genous No Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 96%
None Detected . .
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-20 AB11-261.6B JG Hallllst Floor/East Wing Floor Tile Mastic 2 of 2.
ASBESTOS Homo-
. Color
None Detected %Other Fibrous Materials. �1% Na genous Black
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 100%
Cellulose
Client ID# WEC[D# Location Material Layer
049-21 AB11-2617 JG HalllBasementANest Side TSI-Elbow 1 of 1
ASBESTOS1 . %Asbestos: 20% Homo- Color
Chrysotile S% genous
No Off White
Amosite 12%
Other Fibrous Maferials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 80%
None Detected
Client]D# WEC 1D# Location Material Layer
049-22 AB11-2618 JG HallBasementlWest Side. TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 4�0% Homo- Color
Chrysotile ao% % Other Fibrous Materials: 50% geNBous Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Cellulose 50%
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 5 oo 10
EC
RONIVIENTAL �� Q
CONSULTANTS INC.
73.1 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 9.9501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code: 200124-0
FAX: (907)268-8662
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#t:71 CSLT-04.9 Report#:79150
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Dater 3121/2011
Client lD# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-23 AB11-2619 JG HalllBasement(West Side
T51-Debris 1 of 1
AA�Chrysofile
%Asbestos: 40% Homo- Color
genous
ao% %Other Fibrous Materials: 50% No Off-lNhite
%Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Other-Fibrous Materials
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-24 ABl 1-2620 JG HalllBasementlEastSfde
TSI-Elbow 1 of 1
ASBESTOS °/u Asbestos: 30% Homo-.
genous Color
ChrysoUle 30°i° %Other Fibrous Materials: 40% No Off-White
%Non-Fibrous Materials 30%
Other Fibrous Materials
Cellulose 40%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material. Layer
049-25 AB11-2621 JG Hall/Basement/East Side
TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo- Color
genous
Chrysoble 400/4 a Other Fibrous Materials: 50% No Off-White
%Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Other Fibrous Materials
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-26 F1B1 1-2622 Balto BIdgl2nd Floor/West Side
TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 40% Homo- Color
genous
Chrysotile4 0% %% Other Fibrous Materials: 50% No off-White
%Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
Other Fibrous Materials
Cellulose 50%
Client lD# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
D49-27 AB11-2623A BaEto Bldgilst Floor/SW Side
Floor Tile L of 2
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 4% Homo- Color
genous
Chrysotile 4% No Brown
Non-Fibrous Materials: 96%
Other Fibrous Materials
None Detected
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 02 f 10
WEC ENVIRONMENTAL KIW A
CONSULT ANTS INC.
731 l St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code: 200124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report M 79150
Client Project#: Report By:.C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-27 AB11-2623B Balto Bldg/1st Floor/SW Side Floor Tile Mastic
2 of 2
ASBEST05 Homo- Color
genous
None Detected
No Black
%Non-Fibrous Materials. 100%
Other Fibrous Materials
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
Window Glazir 1 of . t
049728 AB11-2624 Balto BIdgl1st FloorlSW Side 9
nChrys!o-ble
%Asbestos: 3% Homo- Color
genous
3% No Gray
%Non-Fibrous Materials: 97%
Other Fibrous Materials
None Detected
ClientlD# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
D49-29 A1311-262.5A Balto Bldg/1st Floor/SE Side
Floor Tile 1 of 2
I�TChrysoUle
%Asbestos: 4% Hoino- Color
genous
4% No Brown
%Non-Fibrous Materials: 96%
Other Fibrous Materials
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049_29 A611-2625B Balto BIdgl1st FloarlSE Side
Floor Tile.Mastic 2 of 2
Homo- Color
ASBESTOS genous
No Black
None Detected
Nan-Fibrous Materials: 100%
OfherFibrous Materials
None Detected
Client lD# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-30 AB11-2626 Balto Bldg/1st Floor/SE Side
Electric Wire Insul. 1 of 1
Homo- Color
ASBESTOS genous
% Other Fibrous Materials: 30% No Off-White/Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous Materials: 70%
OfherFrbmus Materials
Cellulose 30°�
Report Version: 2011.01,13.01 Page 7 of 10
103
WE
WHITE
ENVIRONMENTAL KWU
CONSLTTAN 1 S INC.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code:20.0124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79150
Client Project#: Report By-C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC 1D# Location Material Layer
049-31 AB11-2627 Balto Bldg/1st Floor/East Side Window Glazing 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 5% Homo. Color
Chrysotile 5% No Off-White
OtlierFibrous Materials 961
Non-Fibrous Materials: 95%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
D49-32 AB11-2628 Balto Bldg/Basement/Under West Stairway TSI-Line 1 of 1
ASBESTOS. %Asbestos:. 25% Homo- Color
Chrysotile 26% % Other Fibrous Materials: 45% genous
No Off-White
Other Fib Materials. %Non-Fibrous Materials. 30%
Cellulose 451/6
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-33 AB11-2629 Balto.BldglBasementlUnder West Stairway TSI-Elbow 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 30% Homo- Color
Chrysotile mk %Other.Fibrous Materials: 50% genous Off-White
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 2096
Cellulose 50%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-34 AB11-2630 Balto BIdglWest Boiler Gasket
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 90% Homo-
genous Color
Chrysotile 90% Brown
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Dyer
049-35 AB11-2631 Balto Bldg/West Boiler Insulation 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo- Color
% Other Fibrous Materials: 98% genous Brown
None Detected No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 2%
Mineral Wool 98%
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 8 of 10
104
WIU
WE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONS-U1,TANTS INC.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99603- (907)258-8661 Lab Code:200124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#.79150
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-36 AB11-2632 Balto BldgNVest Boiler Silver Seal 1 01 1
ASBESTOS Homo- Color
genous
None Detected No Silver
Other Fibrous Materials %Nan-Fibrous Materials: 100%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC[D# Location Material Layer
049-37 AB11-2633 Balto Bldg/East Boiler Gasket 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 90% Homo- dolor
Chrysotile g0% genous Brown
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 10%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-38 AB11-2634 Balto Bldg/East Boiler Insulation 1 of t
ASBESTOS Homo Color
None Detected % Other Fibrous Materials: 99% No genous Brown
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 1%
Mineral Wool 99%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-39 AB11-2635 Balto Bldg]Boiler RoomlSouth Side Tank Insulation 1 of 1
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 50% Homo- Color
Chrysotile 50% genous Off-White
No
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 50%
None Detected
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-40 AB11-2636 Balto Bldg/Boiler Room FloorlSE Side TSI-Debris
ASBESTOS %Asbestos: 30% Homo- Color
Chrysotile 30 % Other Fibrous Materials: 50% geNo s Off-White
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 20%
Cellulose 50%
Report Version: 2011.01.13.01 Page 9 of 10
105
MITE M� _t ENVIRONMENTAL JN
WE CO SULTANTS INC.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661 Lab Code:200124-0
FAX: (907)258-8662
Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79150
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Date:312112011
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-41 A1311-2637 Balto Bldg/Basement Center Electric Wire Insul. 1 of 1
ASBESTOS Homo- Color
Other Fibrous Materials: 60% Homo-
genous
None Detected No Off-White/Black
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 40%
Cellulose 4o°/a
Fibemus Glass 20%
Client ID# WEC ID# Location Material Layer
049-42 AB11-2638 Balto Bldg/SE Side Stucco 1 of 1
ASBEST- Homo-
genous Color
None Detected No Gray
Other Fibrous Materials %Non-Fibrous Materials: 100%
None Detected
Date 3/21/2011
Mil ave,Lab Analyst
Date 3/21/2011
Analysis performed by EPA Method 600/R-931116. All quantities reported are based on visual estimation by PLM,unless point-
counting method is requested and noted for the sample. Test report relates only to items tested and must not be used by client
to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S.Govemment. Test reports must not be reproduced without
the approval of WEC Inc.,and are subject to WEC Inc.General Terms and Conditions(see reverse).
Report Version: 2011,01.13,01 Page 10 6of 10
WHITE ' S
ENV R T ENT�L I�
PROncr
flNSHXi I S INC
,
731.x st Pt -;20% tom.ag 99-501- C�
CHMN OF CC7STODY RECORD --ANALYTICAL REQUEST
ANAL'SCSIS (cimic) TURNAROUM REQUES" NO_OF SAMPLES c ON DAZE:
TEM LEAD
,,
RELINgFEBED BY: ,4F DATE-� �(^ SAMP � BY
E e I[!'71'ir1
SLLIP.-INN h!>tZIOA" £OiI—(siguadrre) SAMPLES RECEIVED BY llATE/TIME
cohm F m
.SAA'��i�pP/" LE'Ot MATERML LOC.AT_10N COMh am
OM—
d u,
o .bl R ;AA
�( 50
w f ll s, 'r e soh 1 It C
T
9- A
Purl
\V-
21
107
WHITE m�H
EN . - ON . 1 wJ TAL
� K CONGr.T]�TA1�TS INC. �
73�.I St Ste.20�,Andia e AK"501 CUENT
Fhone::{- 88 ( 2§9-8662
CHIC OF CUSTODY RECORD -ANALYTICAL REQUEST
A11-1= (circle l TURNAROUND LFFSTID NO.OF SAMFLFS y , CO QN DAM
PC�iTIIy1 IAD S
lf� 7
REIR
"UMM)BY DATE ITO&E `tt SAMPLES RlCENM By DATE/ME
SHPPINGMElfiOD' CO[3R>IIt(si tme) SAMRLPSRECEIVEDBY DATE ITAM
COZsstvf=
SAMPLE'ID►. MATERIAL LOCATION COMMENTS
all �g
a _
CAI- A -71
ECSP
108
ZTE rsd�crxAa�
' EIRONENTAL
xo f t�
CONSULTANTS INC.
-7311JSL Ste,.-2p1,4 hor*e..Ag 9MI CL.Mff ecru xo o�
Phott :;(9 2S8 6G1{. 25$-8652
CHAIEN OF Ct STODY RECORD -ANALYTICAL REQUEST
APLA c SAD TURNAROUND REQUESTED NO.OF S�ih�CE$ l
RELINQUISHED DATE 1 SAMPLES RUC MED BY DATE/TDAE
SMPAINGMEMOD- GYSU�{sippatms) SAWL:FS RECEIVEDHY 1ATE1UNIE
cofl TI'S
$AMPLE'lD#- MA•FERIAL LOCAU014 CdMMEMS
Lk
M' 740
E .. ,
-�o
o
109
F
r
ar` OK
Li gyt
E
s.
x, 3
h $
e.
110
"fit ,"° � � _ \u' -,� ""�"�� s.• �a
Pm Ir
�l } ,aq�i7ed W 6. F 3
a 4 p�-
o d�
q�.
°
<
Y of 6dv
I it Mn
L#L"
Ij
LAW
TWO`,
mce6 1� ,
fPS
&MAL
low
01
nV saw
CEO 1 F,
PIST
112
1,
? t.
' ? }
TeP
J
113
114
.tJ44 ..
c,Fs)
°
<
d
c
,
r
r
z
r
115 m
<_,,, <...,_..E .,�.,dr ���....;.(.»a„«..«»,....,aa°aa..,,. .ria P�°e � ... �.�� „x,.�. uw u.�w..��,.,.r�. .n� �... .P,»..,... ". .,au:�.�;•
t >
E
vi
sOt
116
Appendix B
Lead Sample Results / Field Collection Forms
117
® WHITE
ENVIRONMENTAL
� CONSULTANTS INC.
731 1 St.,Suite 203,Anchorage,AK 99501- (907)258-8661
FAX: (907)258-8662
Lead Analysis in Paint
WEC Project#:11 CSLT-049 Report#:79154
Client Project#: Report By:C.Blanchard
Report Date:3/21/2011
Client: Friends Of Jesse Lee Home Collection By: T.Hubbard
Collection Date: 3/15/2011
Analysis By: J.Hicklin
Analysis Date: 3/2 112 0 1 1
TAT: 5 Day #Samples: 5 Received By: Hicklin
Received Date: 3/21/2011
Project/NameLocation: Jesse Lee Home
Building: Seward,AK
Client 1D# WIEC ID# Result Result Units Reporting Limit
04913-01 AL11-479 220,000 ppm 50
049P-02 AL11-480 180,000 ppm 40
049P-03 AL11-481 7,700 ppm 42
049P-04 AL11-482 15,000 ppm 48
049P-05 AL11-483 2,800 ppm 46
' Date 3/21/2011
oel Hicklin,Lab Analy
7 Date 312112011
Analysis performed by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy,EPA Method SW846-7420. The Reporting Limit is twice that of
the Method Detection Limit(MDL)which is the minimum concentration of analyte that can be reported with 99%confidence that
the analyte's concentration is greater than zero,and is determined from statistical analysis of replicate samples in a given matrix
containing the analyte as defined in 40CFR Part 136,Appendix B. Any modifications that have been made to the previously
referenced test methods are documented in WEC Inc.'s Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Supporting Laboratory
Documentation is available upon request. WEC is a current proficient participant in the AIHA ELPAT program(Lab ID#
102739). Test reports must not be reproduced without the approval of WEC Inc.,and are subject to WEC Inc.General Terms
and Conditions(see reverse).
Report Version: 2011.01.13,01 Page 119Y
WHITE .. . rxo crNA*+F� X
w A
MMC il ENt�IbNCENT�L N
Rl
931.1 iS cS`Ce_r,203 1Ait�'3lo -ir 99501 CLMNrtpxo> 5[FFT Na _cff*
f . !$-8662
CHAIN OF CVSTODY RECORD --ANALYTICAL REQUEST
ANALYSSM. [IE5fF (cize TIMNAtOUND UESTED NO.OFSAMPiFS COLLE A/
RELItI i7LSHEp DATE r 5�� I DATE I TIME2-7
d
SIIIPFIIE M PETC3D" £OUKIEI2(sgnstaM) SAWLPSRECEMDBY DATEITIME 1
COMMA
SAMPLE'IDN MAIERIAL l!LOCAMN COMMEIM
ul
9 Y e
119
Appendix C
Inspectors Certifications
120
�.*t II -i.:.rr� v....�.i1 �rlj� 1.1tF�rtt4 �4.i{ I3�.tflfl•� R?t tit:,!#{�� td-pf.,, ;m'il i�.,� 0'a( ,: (�, \ �,}'dli�FTf a'.r - \� S;f, l/r...,,�\\�5,�55E{i;i,��{f flfry
j rr
..s;. ;..+ ,u° 2'i: �..r,�'}x Y>!' t7 E:,.. .r5t;'�- 1.,;,rn;r� ,T .r,�, rtS t�.s.f� JI +*ab' .:.. ... ,.I E .a, a .fr„vat .:( � {:I � � �, ,f,„n±l•., r + � #
:'s,t , , ,t? ,?"�.� hw; .:.tta`• ..: ?ka'itc.� ^� Z .,r �� I:..f/• .. �!.,.i:p, 1=�;� -,.' ,i`wa i, �:., ^., :� .,. t, .- .„r,,.,�''.p i:v ' ' 3.,iLv. .,."f�
'3.+`+"- S,i.,. M1��f 5.r'�;. .,I7.�k u, � �1 '•Ilr, r =?.,, '^�t��^�' i EI` � r } ,:;.,, 1 rl?' _ h syrl� �,•,i7�r .`�:,I .:ar4 r€ i�k � ^„ ��y Iftin. �,. ll �' !
�'`r .+.•,tr$ ss.t y - �S!.ar+` 4� E F',sYE ,`Si 1`� +•,:..�i. �s 1.-„�� �i! �� )0 _,r. � yt1 � Itrt, " � t/ � °?'`
-
:.,_
.-c > �s : 3'� .r }r' # S #''�' �vw Q�w v�.A � '�.t s, dWLS. N ,.•- �.w 5 : � ,,;.
' tl r 1 ui 's'l� •.
a ' ENVIRONMENTAL li
xF . MANAGEMENT
INCORPORATED f M
r:. Certificate of Training
rf i a
p� T-22133-831 4„
�_�•" e;`�{ e Cerhftcate Number y""+ r� �^•'
a;:r
This is to certify that o
Travis W. Hubbard �f
' Fri',k has satisfactorily completed 4 hours t• N:
t7 7 rl' 3
Of
�
EPA/AHERA Inspector Refresherda'
fafd't,N v 5:p5'
4 s In Accordance With 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E °t
0
gp
Class Start Date; 111412010 Class End Date,- l I1412010
ft�t C �� ✓4 `�
111412010 111412011 Stuart M. Jacques t '
�E David Gonzales Exam Date Cen.Exp.Date Director # z,^ r'
a
Environmental Management!nc. 206 E.Fireweed Lane Suite 201,Anchorage Alaska 99503 907 272-8852 a r`
1' Cr ne:•rmtvn.r ene+n� :emeM1eeecr .r :rrM1.i rs5 e a �.{t5 ' -"'�..
r i � v
;r.- j �r-rie a3.,"+ a.. n. !p- a+��,+a�'NS�, ,�1,�,w + n�' a w '��• _S,.•
•.,,r t4 SSB� *f,. 1{���qy99� ��t fE= '���ppy{§ .y j{r .;d�i�+j� t •f''�.' :��E �[I� i.t�ltyS��\{ fJjt;}ji�I�4tli'M,•(1=t{ til'� .It�4 p�i=, -,.�t��i�*" �{•�f t
t€ N!Y i _ ;�Y:.l;1,; x�R'�. iFf9� �i ';, Ai� e5��f !� "� � l i, �� � � „�4�� !•+l6 ,;,r^ rM1[� `�. it£ ,1�^"}:.s 5�4�}• : i¢ �-'4. .}S�i� 116�e`e 5d-�If'i`s
�', i`r' �tE :-. 5-,Pr ;i;>,S ,l��p,. )� :I�jr•} ll,,I. uE4fi s;,.�;. la :.. ;f',i• :r aip� i�,. .,,r I Iml :,hil, tau, '1+Y... �
�.��,
..:V �" r�`'fFi'1{ ! P�F.1Bl�"+-•.;, 14:.. ,�,L rro>Y'gr -I I :u IEJ , ��. C'I !'�y :� ;turd 41+r,., � .,I t t �.-.r�,�N �" �I r,E,; � n
..-.> 2.' • 57'7�`asrl} ....,'<���Sri ��;!�"'gi ,, .: yr*'�Fj�:, ,'u7,..'"5 ' 1.5 'r�,'#'; =.. .,yr y,✓Et!+k� 1 b+1 `�u`5!' y �'7� .F._ ^,,s;;... ,, ur y °t,�ttv"�"t d�`r.�'/t frn .�<�
11: kf,7, r!.,,u,;. :,av�:,, - :d1,F '�•S^+ log„Ih; :_.,..' n,�I �. Y �;;o '�.�,��.>lr Ilr:,l.. �A ,a 9h- 1 r '"g
--z-. d 1<,„s rt�Y.'lh.`..,.fl r, 171+...,,;.ln....-+`d+/. Ir,,,. e''•F`s"3ds>. `
y .#;.o x,t`in;c\. r!•ed!•:.,,,s.;�.t., .Jrrdt�tfl�.. { A t111'r fl.y,:l:•[3'r.:\"Y�` dg ":1.�� �'� d'r�;! .1 ip'Ej - �! r•��i- fli,,r,:t }� 13',r�72;<.l�fr,dj�j/.5.:�,,:r..,�t\�.17fi„'d:•fe:,. .,
+j7ar .t;t;_ts�t' �J�1 .'t4b`". '�rt3�• v:3S;+fi�,r�?:��I, ,Sti:yt�y`i^. (^—��•� did �f/fir a t• �... 9/ f�,. �55,,."s,?•,;,b�#l",1 /���:. ��g:4ay ''+'a�ts+ih�rl:fOyS gPs. -,re J 1 i i
121
®GOES 746 LITHO.IN US A.
gla, 41"
Eli
pI
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
INCORPORATED
Certificate of Training
T
Certificate Number
This is to certify that
Travis W. Hubbard
has satisfactorily completed 4 hours
Of
EPA/AHERA Management Planner Refresher
6o
' z
In Accordance With 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E
a�
x
Class Start Date; 411512010 Class End Date: 411512010 ---k
411512010 4/1512011 Stuart M. Jacques -6
-Rt
is Dauid Gonzales Exam Date Cerl Exp.Date
Director
To
Environmental management Inc. 206 E.Fireweed Lane Suite 201,Anchorage Alaska 99503 907-272-8852
N"'
............
®GOES 746 122 LITHO IN vs A
f.", XIII
"'ni�11 ,01 New)
I hly
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT .2 M-,
INCORPORATED
Ak
Certificate of Training
MAE
T-21862-831
Certificate Number
e This is to certify that
Travis W. Hubbard
has satisfactorily completed 8 hours
Of
R
EPAIAHERA Project Design Refresher
fi In Accordance with 40 CFR 763 Subpart B, TSCA Title IL, and State of Indiana's
326 LAC 18
ClassEndDate: 411612010
Class StartDate: 411612010
411612010 411612011 Stuart M. Jacques
Exam Date Cert.Exp.Date
David Gonzales Director
EriVronmenta[Management Inc. 206 E.Fireweed Lane Suite 201,Anchorage Alaska 99503 IJ07-272-8852
'I��WMwA-705&047
4"
III...........................
...........
LITHO.IN Us A
APPENDIX C
Drawings of Sample Locations
124
A3 o i IJ
A2
A4
C -.-Jr
I
—_ .
!El
I
Al
1 BASEMENT LEGEND
C-1 NTS (jN
AXX ASBESTOS TEST LOCATION
AXX LAB TEST RESULTS POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS
REFER TO TESTING SUMMARY IN REPORT FOR FULL DETAILS. ALL
SAMPLES HAVE JLH0220- PREFIX.
CITY OF SEWARD JESSE LEE HOME DRAWN:CTO DATE:
CHECK: RAF 2-13-2020
NOTE: BACKGROUND LAYOUT CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT � EHS nLpsxA FILE#: DWG.NO:
APPROXIMATE ONLY ASBESTOS&LEAD SAMPLE LOCATIONS �1C00RA$D
125 ENGINEERING,HEALTH&SAFETY CONSULTANTS 7760-SL C-1
A48 A33
fi
A30 A26
A27
A28
A29
A18
A31
A32
A39 A35 A
A40 25
Al
A24
A36 e L = �I —
A16
A14
A37
A38
A34
A9 A11
A13 A10 Al2
A7 A17 A5
A8 A6
LEGEND
1 MAIN L L O OR
AXX ASBESTOS TEST LOCATION
C-2 NTS AXX LAB TEST RESULTS POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS
N REFER TO TESTING SUMMARY IN REPORT FOR FULL DETAILS. ALL
SAMPLES HAVE JLH0220— PREFIX.
CITY OF SEWARD JESSE LEE HOME DRAWN:CTO DATE:
20
NOTE: BACKGROUND LAYOUT CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT ALASKA CHECK: RAF DWG.
O
APPROXIMATE ONLY ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
� E H S arcoxPox�•rsD FILE# DWG NO
126 ENoaaaaMG,HEALTH&SAFETY coNSOLTANTS 7760-SL C-2
A42
A19
p A41 A20
II ]�
IL
o
A21
A23
A44 A43
A22
LEGEND
1 SECOND F LO O R AXX ASBESTOS TEST LOCATION
C-3 NTS AXX LAB TEST RESULTS POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS
N REFER TO TESTING SUMMARY IN REPORT FOR FULL DETAILS. ALL
SAMPLES HAVE JLH0220— PREFIX.
CITY OF SEWARD JESSE LEE HOME DRAWN:CTO DATE:
20
NOTE: BACKGROUND LAYOUT CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT ALASKA CHECK: RAF DWG.
O
APPROXIMATE ONLY ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
� E H S IN��PDRATED FILE# DWG NO
127 sNcaaaaMc.HEALTH a sererr coNsucTeNzs 7760-SL C-3
4 �
o- b
o-
L L-�
A45
d 6 6 6
o— b
LEGEND
1 THIRD L LO O R AXX ASBESTOS TEST LOCATION
C-4 NTS F—AX—X-1 LAB TEST RESULTS POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS
N REFER TO TESTING SUMMARY IN REPORT FOR FULL DETAILS. ALL
SAMPLES HAVE JLH0220— PREFIX.
CITY OF SEWARD JESSE LEE HOME DRAWN:CTO DATE2-13-2020
NOTE: BACKGROUND LAYOUT CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT � E H SING�PDRATALASKA ED FILE# DWG CHECK: RAF DWG.NO O
APPROXIMATE ONLY ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
128 ENcaaEEFING.HEALTH a SAFETY coNSOLYANTB 7760-SL C-4
APPENDIX D
Key Photos
129
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
1
1
dF
{ 020 .02 . 9.E 16 u'!
Photo 1: Entrance to Jewel Guard Hall
r
N
Photo 2: Jewel Guard 1 st Floor near main entrance, Asbestos pipe insulation, debris
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 130 1 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
Y
h :+
4 • 'wr
r
� r
e
}
Photo 3: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor central wing. Note old shell &tube wiring & remnant wood lath strips at former
plaster ceiling.
}
r,€
Photo 4: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor SW Wing, heavily damaged stairs &flooring
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 131 2 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE II
r yYl
2 1 NF
y � a
�i
s t t{ylY
SM
N x�
,�ue C41u �}isY
A!4
^ r,
4�
.�,kit �/� e"°` '.✓"^' \415�..
9
Photo 5: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor, west central. Note debris swept to the side
"'S 711
. . a
= P
_ S
_Y
Photo 6: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor SW wing, Note Debris, and damaged asbestos pipe insulation
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 132 3 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
a.
tir `1
a
'4
ti p
v
gl,
Photo 7: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor west side near exit. Note swept damaged asbestos pipe insulation and debris
r �6
if I
d
"
6
Photo 8: Jewel Guard, 2nd floor central wing. Added concrete shower pans, may conceal other materials
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 133 4 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
m w
1 1
a
rr i
r
tl 1
w
Photo 9: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor central wing. Added concrete shower pan, may conceal materials.
'r"fiW
. �
a
Photo 10: Jewel Guard, 1 st floor central wing. Concrete floor of bathroom. Note collapsed floor
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 134 5 of 23
7760Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
\ /
� � . .
■ � . . f
� f
. <
}
<
. ,a!
Photo ]t Jewel Guard, ]gfolorcentral aea. Stair damaged and covered ovr
. 11 :39
Photo ]2 Jewel Guard, ]gfloor NE Wing. One G the only places where remnant finishes exist.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 25 6 of23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
s "I
t A
Y 3t
L
7.
�r
� 1
d
• ! s
l`
�7
Photo 13: Jewel Guard, 1st floor, NE Wing. Remnant finish: Fiberboard, covered with plaster.
a.
1
7 ■
Photo 14: Jewel Guard 1 st floor, NE wing, remnant asbestos-containing joint compound patch at former electrical
ceiling light.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 136 7 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
I
Photo 15: Jewel Guard, 1st floor NE wing. Remnant linoleum flooring &damaged asbestos pipe insulation
x
a
4'
4
w
v
Photo 16: Jewel Guard 1st floor, east side. Typical debris including vinyl asbestos tile throughout, variability of
damages to wood finishes.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 137 8 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
G
A
Photo 17: Jewel Guard, 2nd floor looking west. Note Debris, and damaged asbestos pipe insulation
x f
A� y f
i
Photo 18: Jewel Guard, 3rd floor bathroom. Note rotted floor, and damaged vinyl asbestos tile
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 138 9 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
� i
Photo 19: Jewel Guard, 3rd floor SW Wing. Major structural collapse of roof, with temporary bracing.
i
m ,
d� T
_ w
Photo 20: Jewel Guard, 3rd floor SW Wing. Major structural collapse of roof, note broken rafters, with temporary
bracing.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 139 10 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
f
i
Photo 21: Basement Jewel Guard, damaged asbestos pipe insulation.
y�.
2020 . 02 . 13
a�
.may .. ,. _•e,. ,N ,.
Photo 22: Basement Jewel Guard, damaged asbestos pipe insulation in soil.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 140 11 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
a "N
GD
e �
µ b.
Photo 23: Basement Jewel Guard, exit stairs to west side. Collapsed roof.
F M
ek
Y�S
w
Photo 24: Balto, Kitchen wing. Structure apparently damaged by removal of stove.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 141 12 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
i
I .
v
d1 . ,,
y
k1 T!
e�.
4
y7
Photo 25: Balto, N side vents and probable fill location for Bunker C fuel oil tanks.
'' � �.
.. 'Li `
Photo 26: Balto Kitchen Wing. Note Calcium Hydroxide leaching out of Kitchen floor slab
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 142 13 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
^ -_
k
I
pppp--
2020 e
Photo 27: Balto Boiler Room. Note Calcium Hydroxide leaching out of Kitchen floor slab, asbestos debris
u
0.
n;
TITUANWy
•+b
Photo 28: Balto Boiler room with damaged asbestos pipe and tank insulation
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 143 14 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
W
F �.
u u-.
t
Photo 29: Balto Boiler room with damaged asbestos gaskets and pipe insulation
202
yam,
T
..4
5 I
4'1 ,q
i yy
(�
Photo 30: Balto Boiler Room. Note Calcium Hydroxide leaching out of Kitchen floor slab, pipe insulation on floor
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 144 15 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
AM
x " a
w
, .
a :
9
Photo 31: Balto Boiler Room. Note Calcium Hydroxide leaching out of Kitchen floor slab, pipe insulation on floor
- 36
e 9 i r
F y
9
�A
c
a
r
. s.
q
2
r �Y
Photo 32: SW corner of Balto Bldg. Typical plaster exterior finish. Note tree too close to foundation, typical.
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 145 16 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
a
or
„
i
' N
w�
a
" * �"..00
w "
Photo 33: Balto Kitchen, asbestos tar paper under plywood subfloor.
�d
i
}b�.� yk but ♦ „
N
r' v
Photo 34: Balto Kitchen, rotting column where it sits on wet concrete slab above boiler room
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 146 17 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
W"
Photo 35: Balto Dining area, note damaged vinyl asbestos floor tile
a�
a °
a
4 4:7
w
1
w
star.
� r"12 t)l Sir r
Photo 36: Balto East Stairs, Note structural beams cut out for piping
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 147 18 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
s
ti
A
,
2,
4 � A
4
a Vr.
l
Photo 37: Balto Note sheet lead roof drain leader
-• r
202
r
1"
'F
Photo 38: Balto, east stairs, with spruce cones, looking down to entrance to East Arcade
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 148 19 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
�r
Photo 39: East Arcade. With spruce cones. Note linoleum floor remnants, and structure tilt at E end.
Photo 40: Balto East 2nd floor. Note asbestos roof drain insulation &debris
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 149 20 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
2020 - 02 - 13
� 4
4r
t 't
IS,
Photo 41: Balto 2nd Floor. Note cracked roof rafters.
F' !
8"
f
� w
m Y
n
t
� h
h
1pp�F
l�)1
Rt�.
It'ft
II L'i
0'
u
Photo 42: Balto, West Stair, with damaged asbestos pipe insulation
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 150 21 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
4 ,
Photo 43: Balto, West Stair, with damaged asbestos pipe insulation, hatch to West Arcade to Jewel Guard.
}
r
y
+k
a N 20 . 02, 13 15 : 10
Photo 44: West Arcade to Jewel Guard, damaged pipe insulation in soil
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 151 22 of 23
7760 Appendix D — KEY PHOTOS & NARRATIVE
WM
T
I
0 4 Ira, 27
Photo 45: East Arcade to Goode Hall, cut off with exposed crawl space
91
a!,..
o
•
w
a a, ,i Jry1 2
r rl ly .. 21n"
Photo 46: East Arcade to Goode Hall, damaged pipe insulation in soil, concrete rubble
Seward Jesse Lee Home
Seward, Alaska 152 23 of 23
APPENDIX E
Rough Estimate of Quantities
153
Appendix E-Jesse Lee Home Rough Quantities
Material East Arcade West Arcade Balto Jewel Guard Group Total Renovation Demolition Comment
Adjusted Pipe Insulation, LF,mostly falling off 472 357 144 1599 2643 2643 2643 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Tank Insulation SF almost all has fallen off 50 50 50 50 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Gaskets,valve packings.Remove intact w piping 1 lot 1 lot 1 lot 1 lot 1 bunch 1 bunch Could remain during demolition,but unlikely,as
piping likely to be removed with insulation"intact"
Boiler Room Cleanup LF Pipe insul 300 300 300 300 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Boiler Demolition,Each 2 2 2 2 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Tar Paper underlayment Balto Bldg. 6740 6740 400* 0*allowance for some floor replacement.Non-
friable,
could remain during demolition
Soil cleanup,Basements,Square Feet 613 460 0 2774 3847 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Soil cleanup Basements,assumes 4 inches of soil removal,Cubic Feet 1282 1282 1282 Demolition would be about 2/3 the effort,because
floor removed,but require 2 mobilizations
Floor Area Cleanup of all debris Basement,SF 3430 3480 Remove priorto demolition or renovation
Floor Area Cleanup of all debris,1st floor,SF 6501 480 33701 6270 Due to extensive pipe insulation debris,
Floor Area Cleanup of all debris,2nd floor,SF 3370 6270 all floors would need to be cleaned for
Floor Area Cleanup of all debris,3rd floor,SF 6270 both renovation or demolition
650 480 10170 22290 33590 33590 33590
Badly damaged and friable,would need to be
9x9 VAT,SF 3000 100 3100 3100 3100 removed in either demo or renovation,but pretty
easy to clean up. No mastics have been shown to be
ACM,but they could remain for Demo
Windows w/ACM Glazing,Each(counting from 2003 Elevations) 250 250 250 0 Non friable,can remain during demo.
Bunker C fuel oil tank removal,Each 2 2 2 2 Remove prior to demolition or renovation
Bunker C removal in Boiler Room,SF of concrete floor 250 250 250 250 Remove prior to demolition or renovation
Metallic Lead Removal 1 lot 1 lot 1 lot Remove priorto demolition.Could be reused during
renovation.
Exterior Stuco with lead-based paint. 1 lot 1 lot 1 lot 1 lot Choice of removal to leave in place during demolition
would depend on TCLP results for whatever the
anticipated waste stream(s)will be forthe project.
Vertical Pipe Insulation,from Survey Notes 4 3
2 1
4 4
6 2
9 4
8 8
2 2
2 2
Adjusted Subtotal,added to pipe insulation total 72
154
SCHNEIDER Av►V
STRLt CTURAL ENGINEERS
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT
731 1 Street., Suite 200 REPORT
Anchorage,Alaska 99501
Phone: 907.561.2135 www.sastructural.com
CLIENT: R&M Consultants, Inc.
9101 Vanguard Dr.
Anchorage, Alaska 99507
ATTENTION: Kim Nielsen
PROJECT: Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment
Swetmann Ave.
Seward, Alaska 99664
PROJECT NO.: 219155
REPORT DATE: April 15, 2020
PURPOSE OF THIS ASSESSMENT:
At the client's request, Schneider Structural Engineers (SSE) personnel performed a site visit to the
referenced property. The purpose of this assessment is to observe and comment on existing structural
conditions, to identify areas of dangerous conditions, and to make general recommendations regarding
structural repairs/retrofits that will be required for reasonable and safe access for Haz-Mat and
abatement personnel prior to demolish or renovation. This assessment does not cover actual design or
specific engineering for each condition observed. Only our observations, conclusions, and
recommendations are presented in this report.
Our investigation was limited to a visual observation of the existing property. Our observations were only
as thorough as required to gain a general understanding of representative structural conditions, and to
identify and document areas of potential structural concern. We observed only those portions of the
structure that were easily accessible and exposed to view. The thoroughness and accuracy of our
observations are only as accurate as the methods imply.
Our knowledge of the building is based on our observations and our review of the following documents:
• Jesse Lee Home Historic Structure Report prepared by ECl/Hyer, Inc. dated May, 2003
• Previous structural assessment prepared by Schneider Et Associates Structural Engineers, Inc.,
dated July 8th, 2011.
• Hazardous Materials Assessment prepared by Engineering Health Et Safety Consultants(EHS-Alaska,
Inc.), dated March 12th,2020
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The existing structures were originally constructed in the 1920's as a boarding school for dislocated and
orphaned children. In subsequent decades, improvements and alterations were made to the existing
structures. The center has been closed and abandoned for decades. The City of Seward recently
acquired the property and historic structures. It is the desire of the city to clean up the property and
buildings and either demolish or renovate the structure for occupancy. SSE has been contracted to take
a second look at the property, some years later now, from the previous assessment conducted in 2011.
The primary directive for this assessment is to determine and identify dangerous sections of the
structure that pose a substantial risk to life and safety for hazardous materials abatement operations
to be conducted.
CREATINC'. ELEC+AN7 SC7l_4lTfC]id SCHNEIDER.•:' Page 1
155
HNEIDER *vv
E Ni.:�IN E E:Ra&
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
The client has requested that we perform a visual assessment of existing structures to identify any
structural deficiencies or safety issues which pose immediate life-health and safety concerns for the
purposes of the following work: hazardous material abatement and construction of temporary
reinforcements to structural systems.
BUILDING AND SITE INFORMATION:
The site is located on the hillside above the bay at 1824 Phoenix Road in Seward, Alaska. Located on the
site are the Jewell Guard and Balto buildings and connecting arcades. The buildings are two and three
stories above basement and crawlspace levels. The connecting arcades are single story enclosed corridors
over a crawlspace.
GENERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTIONS:
• These buildings are wood framed using conventional methods of the time. Wood framed
bearing walls at the exterior and interior support the loads imposed by gravity, such as self-
weight and snow.
• The roof framing for all the structures utilizes the ridge board, rafter, collar tie method to
create the slopes, ridges and valleys of the roof planes. Ridge boards are typically 1x material
supporting 2x rafter and collar tie framing. While this framing system was typical for the late
1800's to the early 1900's and has traditionally performed adequately, it is no longer
considered a viable system to support loads, especially snow loads. Evidence in these
structures was observed where splitting of the rafters, buckled collar ties, and excessive roof
deflections have all occurred.
• The floor framing for all the structures consists of wood 1x decking on wood joists supported by
wood bearing walls and wood beams. Spacing of the joists appeared to be consistently 16" on
center.
• The exterior and interior wall framing consists of wood studs spaced at generally 16" on
center. Typically seen at openings for windows and doors the headers consist of a small built
up beams with diagonal stud braces. Diagonal wood bracing (blocking in the plane of the wall)
was observed in many, but not all exterior walls.
• The foundation system consists of cast-in-place concrete footings, basement walls and stem
walls. In some areas that the stem wall or basement wall had been cut or demolished in the
past, small reinforcing bars were observed. Interior posts are supported by concrete spread
footings.
• Lateral loads (as from wind and seismic events) are resisted and transmitted to the foundations
by separate mechanisms for the main building shell and floor. However, the existing elements
to resist these loads are not recognized by building codes and any future use will require the
complete upgrade and construction of a lateral load resisting system, which will include
horizontal (roof and floors) plywood sheathed diaphragm, vertical plywood shear walls, hold
down anchors and adequate foundations.
• Completed Et partially completed shoring exists throughout the structures. Some of this shoring
is unbraced.
[ ATINC. C3 E�FAN-r .50LUTIONS SCHNEIDER A,•:
;ESE Page t
156
HNEIDER *vv
E Ni.:�IN E E:Ra&
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
SITE VISIT:
We walked around the exteriors and interiors of the structures on Feb. 13th, 2020. We observed the
structures for signs of existing or impending structural failure. Such conditions, if they existed, may
consist of the following:
• Collapse (partial or complete)
• Detachment, dislodgement, or excessive deformation of members and structural systems, of
the buildings structure
• Leaning of the building frame
• Shifting of the building off its foundations
We observed those portions of the structures that were readily accessible and exposed to view. Our
observations were thorough enough to gain a representative understanding of the existing conditions.
Some areas of the structure were not accessible for visual assessment due to existing concerns for
safety at those locations.
OBSERVATIONS: (site photos attached as Appendix A).
We observed the following conditions of note:
• Wall Collapse at several locations (See Figures 1 and 2)
• There is an exterior chimney adjacent to the boiler, and it is collapsing, and the wall around it
is collapsing. Note: Friable asbestos hazards have been identified in numerous locations
throughout the structures, on, in and near structural members/systems. (See Figures 2,3 and 4)
• Various locations of structural shoring, segments are not braced well and have insufficient load
paths for the existing bracing and roof. This is caused because the load path to the foundation
is broken/setting on compromised flooring systems, which lack further bracing underneath to
provide a positive direct load path to the foundation. This has occurred in several locations.
(See Figures 5,6,7 and 8)
• Floor collapse or collapsing was observed in several locations. (See Figures 8 thru 14)
• Sections of the roof systems were observed to have collapsed or be collapsing. Broken rafters,
severely deflected members and partially or fully collapsed sections were observed. (See
Figures 15, 16 and 17)
• Collapsed and unsafe conditions were observed at several stair systems.
(See Figures 18 thru 24)
• Areas of compromised beam and post systems were observed, either from rotten materials or
from poor construction practices. (See Figures 25 thru 31)
• Several locations exist where the concrete foundations have severe spatting/cracking and
general weather degradation. In addition, some structural wood members are embedded in
concrete and most are rotten at embedment locations. (See Figures 32 thru 35)
• Good shoring and completely repaired flooring was observed in several locations. (See Figures
36 thru 41)
[ ATINC'. E�FC3AN-r 50LUTIONS SCHNEIDER Ars;E�E Page 3
157
HNEIDER *vv
E Ni.:�IN E E:Ra&
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on our observations, we make the following conclusions and offer the following
recommendations for future action:
• There is considerable further deterioration of the structure as compared to the previous
structural assessment performed in 2011.
• Due to the structural deficiencies observed, it is recommended that no individuals or groups of
individuals other than professional qualified and licensed personnel with expertise and
experience be allowed entry to these structures.
• Prior to hazardous material abatement to be conducted, a new temporary shoring and
reinforcement design should be conducted by Schneider Structural Engineers or another
licensed professional structural engineering firm with specific attention to the areas defined
for abatement to occur and in coordination with the abatement plan.
• A shoring plan and design should be conducted with coordination between contractor, hazmat
cleanup subcontractor and structural engineering sub., so that effective and efficient work can
be achieved with specific attention to life safety.
• Once shoring and structural reinforcements has been established, hazardous materials
abatement could potentially proceed in either a level by level effort or space by space format.
(coordination will be required)
• After hazardous material removal has been concluded, the structures may be fully evaluated
for remediation and restoration and financial feasibility. At this future point a comprehensive
structural evaluation can be conducted and specific recommendations for permanent structural
retrofit can be provided.
• It should be noted that there has already been significant effort put into previous evaluations
structural or otherwise, that maybe drawn upon. However, additional structural damage has
occurred and will continue to occur since the previous evaluations, causing exacerbation to the
already identified structural deficiencies and causing new unidentified structural damage.
MAIN AREAS OF CONCERN:
1. Wall Collapse above boiler (See S211, grid G between 3 and 4.4) and adjacent chimney
collapsing with apparent asbestos debris. See figures 2, 3 and 4.
2. Area in Figure 1 tt 1.1. This area is shored, but not braced well and lacks a good load path
by observation. Calculations are recommended to determine if the supporting floor joists
are capable of the sustained loads from the second story and roof above. The floor above is
collapsing in and is dangerous. Once the shoring is improved and calculations can verify the
sustained load capacity of the floor joists this area and the space above should be
accessible.
3. Collapse at dormer, S213, grid 8. There is a dormer at this location that is falling in of
itself. It has been shored and some of the shoring is ok, but much of the shoring (especially
the horizontal collar tie-type members that were added) is severely overloaded and
exhibited marked bowing and lateral -torsional type buckling. The 4x12 along the floor is
holding up portions of the roof and thus the floor is holing up the entire roof area with no
shoring below to move the loads to the ground. Additional calculations for adequate
shoring and load path should be considered here. See figures 6, 6.1 and 6.2
4. Floor framing JGH at grids A to B at 7 to 9. The floor is very wavy and deflected in this
area. This area needs calculative analysis to determine if it is sufficient and requires
AV
[;ESEATINC. ELFC3AN-r50LUTIONS SCHNEIDERAvV Page
158
HNEIDER *vv
E Ni.:�IN E E:Ra&
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
shoring or additional shoring.
5. Stairs that will be used to carry out abated materials should be reconstructed prior to
work, ideally a single egress route can be chosen and reconstructed prior to abatement
work.
6. The floors are a mix of very soft with holes present at some locations and at other locations
the floors seem adequate. It is recommended that areas that feel spongy or have obvious
holes should be overlaid with sheathing. All egress exists should also be sheathed.
Overall Perspective:
Since 2013 (SSE previous evaluation) the building has really deteriorated. Overall, the
structure/s are not in bad shape given the history. If restoration is to be considered it should be
done very soon. Restoration is a viable option in our opinion.
LIMITATIONS OF THIS ASSESSMENT:
Schneider Structural Engineers' services have been performed with the appropriate care and judgment
that can be reasonably expected given the project constraints. The opinions noted in this report are
based on limited visual observations only. No numerical analysis was performed to determine the
structural adequacy or code compliance of the structure.
SSE does not express or imply any warranty of the structure, nor do we guarantee that we have
observed all areas of the existing structure or identified all deficiencies. Certain assumptions regarding
existing conditions have been made which cannot be verified without significant additional effort,
which are beyond the scope of this assessment.
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Forest W. Bishop, E.I.T. ENG II Ron H. Schneider, S.E.
ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A: Site Photos
**Note 1**: Recommend restricted entry due to existing hazardous condition, until properly fitted
structural shoring is in place and/or repaired for use or entry as noted in photos.
[ ATINC'. E�FC3AN-r 50LUTIONS SCHNEIDER Avv;E�E Page 5
159
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR"— _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
W
1
Figure 1: Area of Exterior Wall Collapse with Existing Temporary Shoring.
(Note Full Load Path is Unestablished) Add Additional Temporary Shoring In Line Below Existing
Shoring at Level Below to Provide Load Path. Otherwise Acceptable for Abatement Purposes.
I
Figure 1.1: Same Area as Figure 1, Showing the Upper Floor Collapsing In.
�7
CRE:ATINC' ELEC+ANT 25OL- lTIONS 160 f�'iC Cyr' f� Page 2
HNEI DER A.Avv
LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
.. l
ITO
M
6 w
I
A
W
Figure 2: Exterior Wall Collapse and Chimney Above Boiler Room. If Access to this Area is Required,
Add Temporary Shoring to Chimney. "Note 1**
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN r 50ULJ7'10NS 161 S,",'�'I'j11: C1�'"F,I Page 3
HNEI DER A.Avv
l"RL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
xV
a yy
�.r �
41
p' iM
p
N
4,
Figure 3: Boiler Room, Surrounding Concrete and Masonry Structure is
Failing/Leaning/Spalled/Broken in Several Locations. Slab Above is Leaking. Friable Asbestos
Lagging Apparent. Selective Demolish of this Area is Recommended Prior to Entry for and during
Abatement.
[;REATINC. ELEC+AN'r50L-LJTIONS 162 SCHNEIDER Page
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
i
r
, t
IN,,,
Figure 4: Area of Boiler Room Wall, where Collapse Occurred and Remainder was Demolished.
AV
CRE:ATINC: ELFR I'r 50L-L-PTfONS 163 SCHNEIDER AvV Page 5
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
N�
w
w,
.s
— aria
Figure 5: Unbraced Shoring. Add Diagonal Bracing to Shoring.
AV
CREATINC: ELEC+AN-r5OL-UTfONS 164 SCHNEIDERAvV Page
HNEI DER A.Avv
ST-: .. e YLJF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
a � F
� t
N
rv�
I ul��IYY
U��
�y 5�y
T �Ii1IY
�t
,�1+y
a
Figure 6: Area Exhibits Bowing and Sagging of Shoring Sections, Due to Lack of Sufficient Load
Paths Established to Foundations. Further Exacerbated by Incomplete Repairs and Continued Roof
Degradation and Lack of Weather Barrier. Access to this Area Should be Restricted. Based Upon the
Abatement Report Access to this Area should not be Required for Abatement.
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 50L-LJT10NS 165 SCHNEIDER Av;i Page 7
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR"— _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
01.
Figure 6.1
Bob—
Figure 6.2
CRE:ATINC'. ELIFR3A v r -50L- l-rfcaNS 166 +]CHNEIDER.& v'
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR-_ _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
kL
I
�a
u,
n' ar
UA-
r
j
Figure 7: Close-Up View of Figure 6, Showing Additional Broken Roof Structure and Degradation
after Shoring was Originally Established. Additional Insufficient Shoring Added.
C:REATINC'. ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTIONS 167 SCHNILEIDER '"°TA Page 9
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIW1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
...............
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
m
4 °
, w.
TWO ro
Ile ..
me
u°
k
Figure 8: Unbraced Shoring Et Failing/Rotten Supporting Flooring System. Add Diagonal Bracing to
Shoring Members and Add Additional Sheathing to Close Holes in Floor. "Note 1**
CRE:ATINC: I'r 5 N E�IFIR 0ULJTf0S 168 SCHNEIDERA,rw Page 10
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
„ 77'
213,28 -0
W i a
1
*k
r
a
w,
xW "
Figure 9: Floor Collapse Near Boiler. Add Sheathing at Areas Required for Abatement Access.
CREATING: ELEC3ANT 50L-11TIONS 169 SCHNEIDER Arw Page 11
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
h�
Y
2 l w
Figure 10: Degraded Flooring System and Perforation. Add Sheathing in Area of Failure. "Note 1**
CREATING: ELEC3ANT 50ULJTf0NS 170 SCHNEIDER Arw Page 12
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIW1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
4 ,
m a
� V a
l
y
iv I
'�Er
Figure 11: Collapsing Floor At Corner. Add Sheathing in Area of Failure. "Note 1**
CRE:ATINC: ELEC+AhIT 50ULJTf0NS 171 SCHNEIDERArw Page 13
HNEI DER A.AVv
TR-- _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
IJIf
A
I
Figure 12: Collapsing Floor- Rotten from Exposure. Provide Temporary Shoring Below, Replace or
Reinforce Fully Rotten Joists and Overlay with Sheathing as Necessary "Note 1**
C:REATINC'. ELEC+AN-r 50L-LJ7'1ONS 172 S,",'�'I'j11: C1�'"F,i Page 14
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
-u
141
fl
m
T
� n
,
�F
r
J
i1w;
�
Figure 13: Floor Area Previously Identified as Dangerous. Provide Temporary Shoring Below,
Replace or Reinforce Fully Rotten Joists and Overlay with Sheathing as Necessary. "Note 1**
AV
CREATING: ELEC3AN7 50L-11TIONS 173 SCHNEIDER AvT Page 15
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
NK
dui
iun t
lMI�
Figure 14: Interior Floor with Extreme Deflection and Sloping. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
AV
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTfONS 174 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 16
HNEIDER ,OFAv
STRL:_YURAL CNGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
17
Q �
N
m
Figure 15: Roof Rafters Broken and Roof Structure Partially Collapsed. Not Issue for Access to
Abate.
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 50L-L-PTfONS 175 SCHNEIDER Arw Page 17
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-:' .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
o
N�.
NI
W
R
I
2 M ) 2 . 18
Figure 16: Roof Rotten, Previously Temporary Cover Attached, With Additional Degradation and
Rot at Surround. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
AV
CREATING: ELEC3ANT 50ULJT10NS 176 SCHNEIDERAvV Page 18
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
MEN-
a
Figure 17: Broken Roof Framing Members. Repairs not Required for Broken Roof Members to
Perform Abatement.
AV
CREATING: ELEC3ANT 5OL-UTfONS 177 SCHNEIDERAvV Page 19
HNEI DER A.AVv
LT-:' .. e YLJF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
.` 411,
P
- m
/'
1
tCi —
n
e
1
i
r t
a
i
i
Figure 18: Stairs Boarded-Up and Collapsed. Replace with Temporary Stair for Abatement Purposes
if Required. Overlay Sheathing As Necessary for Abatement Purposes
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN r 50L_LJ710NS 178 -- Page 20
HNEI DER A.AVv
LT-:' .. e YLJRAL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
r4 �
fit
AW
i
r ....
a '
4
a 4
yy�
l
�ry
Figure 19: Stairwell Unsafe and Surrounding Flooring Rotten. Replace with Temporary Stair for
Abatement Purposes if Required. Overlay Sheathing as Necessary for Abatement Purposes.
CRE: sTINC' eLIFR3A N-r 5ot-U71ONs 179 +�.� Cyr' Page 21
HNEI DER A.Avv
LT-:' .. e YLJRAL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
a rx
1
KK
l�
Figure 20: Stairwell Appears in Safe and Usable Condition at this location. May Be Utilized for
Abatement Purposes.
C'FRE:ATINC' eLIFR3A N-r 5OL-LJT>IONS 180 +�.� Cyr' Pale 22
SCHNEIDER AIF Avv
ST,�-27URALEw G wE=@=
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
99 / ®
( / \
� � . . .
/ 7g,
» \:
Figure 21: Unsafe E Rotten Star. Replace with Temporary Stair fo r Abatement Purpos o f
Required.
CRe«�No eEen«m-r socu�owa e1 SCHN )[R A v mg 23
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR"- _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
AL
w
Figure 22: Stairwell Condition Unknown, Surrounding Structure Rotten and Failing, Assumed to be
in Similar Condition. (Inappropriate Graffiti Obscured) Replace with Temporary Stair for Abatement
Purposes if Required.
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTIONS 182 SCHNEIDER vA Page 24
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR"— _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
R`
h
w
Figure 23: Stairwell Appears in Relatively Good Condition,
Further Investigation and Minor Repairs May Be required. Usable for Abatement Purposes.
Reinforce Guard Rail if Required for Use.
CRE:ATINC E�EC+AhI r 5C71.4lTfc]+t 183 SCHNEIDER Avv Page 25
HNEI DER A.AVv
LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
WPM
j7e ,k of
Or
M a
i
Figure 24: Collapsed Stairs and Surrounding Structure in Poor Condition. **Note 1**
Replace with Temporary Stair for Abatement Purposes if Required. Overlay Sheathing As Necessary
for Abatement Purposes
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN'r 5C71_llTIONS 184 SCMIFIDER "T Page 26
HNEI DER A.AVv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
. ti
:
Figure 25: Supporting Column Severely Degraded at Midspan and Rotting at Base.
Add Additional Columns to Provide Load Path. Use Framing Clips to Positively Attach Existing and
Additional Shoring Members.
CREATINC. ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTfONS 185 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 27
HNEI DER A.Avv
TR"- _MURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
W dA
e o s
4
V
7
Figure 26: Temporary Supports Added to Column Line, Original Columns have Rotted at Floor
Intercepts with Collapsed Floor Around. Load Transfer to Foundations Not Fully
Established with Temporary Repair. Add Additional Columns In Line with Floor Below to Provide
Load Path. Use Framing Clips to Positively Attach Existing and Additional Shoring Members.
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTIONS 186 SCHNEIDER V V Page 28
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
w
PA 4.rua�.w�F �
(4
Figure 27: Poorly Constructed and Connected Beam Section. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
CREATINC. ELEC+AN r 50L-UTfONS 187 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 29
HNEI DER A.Avv
'LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
20
tt
� +r
f
M
i
�d
Ii ei��ftv N, ul t
Figure 28: Notched/Broken Beam-Composite Structural Bearing System. Poor Construction
Practices Evidenced. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
AV
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 50ULJT10NS 188 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 30
SCHNEIDER AIF Avv
ST,�-27URALEw G wE=@=
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
!� . .
. . .. � .
. . � . \
� � � s� . ■ , . » °
Figure 29 Exterior Column/Framing Member Rotten E Exposed. No Issue fo r Access to Abate.
CRe«TINoeEen«mr socuTI owa 189 SChh[ [/[ Pgea
HNEI DER A.AVv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
m ,
..
Figure 30: Top of Column Lack Positive Attachment. Add Framing Clips For Temporary Positive
Attachment to Prevent Accidental Dislodgment During Abatement.
AV
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTfONS 190 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 32
HNEI DER A.Avv
LT-: .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
}Y
s
FK20
T .>
� 6
y �
I
X -
k
Figure 31: Column Rotten at Floor Intercept. Surrounding Floor Also Rotten. Temporary Wood
Shoring Similar in Size is Required to Bring Conditions to Safe Entry Condition. **Note 1**
C:REATINC.: ELEC+AN r 50L-UTIONS 191 SCHNEIDER ,vA Page 33
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
82 . 13 IC
a ,
5
Figure 32: Rafter Bracing Embedded in Concrete. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
AV
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTfONS 192 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 34
SCHNEIDER AIF Avv
ST,�-27URALEw G wE=@=
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
\ �\ »
. , .
Figure 33 Wood Studs Embe dde in Concrete/Mortar, Rotten atop Concrete Wall. Floor May Need
Sheathing Overlay
CRe«�NoeEen«mr socu�owa 1m SCHN )[RA V mg 35
HNEI DER A.Avv
LT-:' .. e YUF?AL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
t
r
4
�..
.,I 40
Figure 34: Concrete Spalled, Broken/Cracked at Perforation. Not Issue for Access to Abate.
CRE:ATINC: E�EC3AnlT SC7l_4lTfC]id 194 SCHNEIDER A,rw Page 36
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
A
At
w
N
IN '
i
' -
k ip
Iren � II "I" 2 M M.
Figure 35: Concrete Wall Spalling/Cracked Broken at Corner of Window Perforation. Not Issue for
Access to Abate.
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 50L-L-PTfONS 195 SCHNEIDER A,rw Page 37
HNEI DER A.AVv
LT-:' .. e YURAL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
i M
t� VW
w.
m
�w
a
Figure 36: Newly Established and Repaired Flooring System, Good Construction Practices Observed.
CRE: sTINC' eLIFR3A N-r sot_UTtiONS 196 +�.� Cyr' Page 38
HNEI DER A.AVv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
14
s'
o-
Figure 37: Newly Established Bracing and Reinforcing Systems with Tension Ties. Good
Construction Practices Observed.
AV
CREATING: ELEC+AN r 5OL-UTfONS 197 SCHNEIDER Av V Page 39
HNEI DER A.Avv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
PP
�h
J
a
Figure 38: Newly Established Bracing and Reinforcing Systems with Tension Ties. Good
Construction Practices Observed.
[;REATINC. ELEC+AN'r50L-LJTfONS 198 SCHNEIDERAvV Page40
HNEI DER A.AVv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
40
„ t
a
ti
4
G�
p
Y( YI
ry
Figure 39: Newly Established Tension Ties. Good Construction Practices Observed.
CREATINC: ELEC+ANr5OL-UTfONS 199 SCHNEIDERAvV Page41
HNEI DER A.AVv
'LT-: .. e MURAL EN GIN1:R
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
qua
N
3
r
C
iJ
- r
I
Figure 40: Newly Established Flooring and Joist System. Good Construction Practices Observed.
AV
CREATING ELEGANT SOLU71ONS 200 SCHNEIDERAvV Page42
HNEI DER A.AVv
STRL:_YURAL ENGINC=Ft
Jesse Lee Home Structural Assessment Report
Seward, Alaska March 18th, 2020
APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS
i
e
.ri
Figure 41: Newly Established Flooring and Joist System. Good Construction Practices Observed.
CREATINC. ELEC+ANr5OL-UTfONS 201 SCHNEIDERAvV Page43
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
GENERAL
FRIENDS OF JESSE LEE HOME (hereafter referred to as the Client) has hired Schneider & Associates to
perform a limited condition assessment of the existing historical structures currently known today as the
Jesse Lee Home in Seward, Alaska. The purpose of this assessment is to observe and comment on existing
structural conditions, to identify areas of dangerous conditions, and to make general recommendation
regarding structural repairs/retrofits that will be required to bring these buildings into code compliance for
potential occupancy. Our observations, conclusions, and recommendations are presented in this report.
Our investigation was limited to a visual observation of the existing property. Our observations were only
as thorough as required to gain a general understanding of representative structural conditions, and to
identify and document areas of potential structural concern. We observed only those portions of the
structure that were easily accessible and exposed to view. The thoroughness and accuracy of our
observations are only as accurate as the methods imply.
Our knowledge of the building is based on our observations and our review of the following document:
• Jesse Lee Home Historic Structure Report prepared by ECl/Hyer, Inc dated May, 2003
Our knowledge of the site soils is based only on our general knowledge of the prevailing soils conditions
in the area; a geotechnical investigation report (soils report) was not available for review. No numerical
analysis or load testing has been performed to evaluate the load-carrying capacity of the existing
structure.
Recommendations for immediate shoring of dangerous or immeinant structural failure has been
addressed under a separate report. This report will not readdress these items.
SITE VISIT
A site visit of the subject property was conducted on February 215t and 22nd of 2011. Review of in
progress shoring efforts was conducted and additional time was used to document the conditions and
findings of the existing buildings.
Page 1
202
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS (Photos are included as Appendix A)
General Building and Site Description
The site is located in the hillside above the bay in Seward, Alaska. The site is currently fenced off to
prevent access due to the dangerous conditions that the structures are in. Located on the site are the
Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings and connecting arcades. The buildings are two and three stories above
basement and crawlspace levels. The connecting arcades are single story enclosed corridors over a
crawlspace.
Structural Systems Descriptions
1. General:
These buildings are wood framed using conventional methods at the time. Wood framed bearing walls at
the exterior and interior support the loads imposed by gravity, such as self weight and snow.
2. Roof Framing:
The roof framing for all the structures utilizes the ridge board, rafter, collar tie method to create the
slopes, ridges and valleys of the roof planes. Ridge boards are typically 1x material supporting 2x rafter
and collar tie framing. While this framing system was typical for the late 1800's to the early 1900's and
has traditionally performed adequately, it is no longer considered a viable system to support loads,
especially snow loads. Evidence in these structures was observed where splitting of the rafters, buckled
collar ties, and excessive roof deflections have all occurred.
3. Floor Framing:
The floor framing for all the structures consists of wood 1x decking on wood joists supported by wood
bearing walls and wood beams. Spacing of the joists appeared to be consistently 16"on center.
4. Exterior and Interior Wall Framing:
The exterior and interior wall framing consists of wood studs spaced at generally 16"on center. Typically
at openings for windows and doors the header consisted of a small built up beam with diagonal stud
braces. Diagonal wood bracing (blocking in the plane of the wall) was observed in many, but not all
exterior walls.
5. Foundations and Floor Slab:
The foundation system consists of cast-in-place concrete footings, basement walls and stem walls. In
areas that the stem wall or basement wall had be cut or demolished at some point, small reinforcing bars
could be seen (approximately #3 equivalent running horizontal). Interior posts are bearing on concrete
pad footings.
Page 2
203
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
6. Lateral Force Resisting System
Lateral loads (as from wind and seismic events) are resisted and transmitted to the foundations by
separate mechanisms for the main building shell and floor. However, the existing elements to resist
these loads are not recognized by building codes and any future use will require the complete upgrade
and construction of a lateral load resisting system, which will include horizontal (roof and floors) plywood
sheathed diaphragm, vertical plywood shear walls, hold down anchors and adequate foundation.
Page 3
204
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
CONDITION/RECOMMENDATION TABLE
JEWEL GUARD BUILDING
Location/Area Condition Recommendation
Foundation —
1 Exterior concrete While much of the concrete stem . Expose the exterior side of the
basement/stem walls are not visible to be concrete walls.
walls evaluated, the areas that are . Patch and fill cracks with an epoxy
indicate that the concrete has grout on both sides of the walls.
deteriorated substantially due to . Apply a fiber reinforced polymer
the continued exposure to the (FRP) on both sides of the walls.
wet marine environment and the . Waterproof exterior side
freeze/thaw seasonal cycle. . Provide foundation drainage system
2 Foundation - The exterior footings supporting No retrofit anticipated
Exterior Footings the building are not visible to be
evaluated. If the loads to the
foundations are not changed, the
footings are anticipated to
perform as required.
3 Foundation - The interior footings supporting Further evaluation should be conducted
Interior Footings wood posts and/or wood framed to verify existing conditions.
walls were not all visible to be
evaluated. Some footings were
addressed in the shoring report.
4 First Floor In general the floor joists are in
Framing adequate condition. During any
potential construction, damaged
joists should be replaced.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current
use, the floor would need to be
evaluated to ensure it has the
capacity to support code
required live loads based on
occupancy.
Page 4
205
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
5 Second Floor In general the floor joists are in
Framing adequate condition. During any
potential construction, damaged
joists should be replaced.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current
use, the floor would need to be
evaluated to ensure it has the
capacity to support code
required live loads based on
occupancy.
6 Third Floor In general the floor joists are in
Framing adequate condition. During any
potential construction, damaged
joists should be replaced.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current
use, the floor would need to be
evaluated to ensure it has the
capacity to support code
required live loads based on
occupancy.
7 All Floors The diagonal 1x wood decking is • Provide 5/8"thick plywood
not adequate. The decking does sheathing over existing 1x
not behave as a horizontal decking.
diaphragm to transfer lateral . Screw sheathing to existing
loads, such as wind and seismic decking and framing.
to the vertical resisting elements. • Repair/replace damaged, rotten
or missing 1x decking.
8 Roof Framing The roof framing for the entire Since failure of the roof structure
structure has areas of distress members was observed, the entire
and failure. The roof framing roof structure (not including the chapel
method utilizing ridge board, room) should be removed and
rafters and collar ties, is a replaced with a new conventional
method that is no longer framing system such as prefabricated
recognized as an acceptable trusses or ridge beam and joist
framing method. system.
Page 5
206
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
9 Roof Framing-Old Since the roof over the old This roof cannot remain as the main
Chapel Room chapel is an architectural structural roof, but it can remain as
significant feature of the the ceiling system for this room. An
building, this area should remain. architectural and structural solution
It appears that this area of the will need to be investigated to keep
roof has performed better than the existing in place while adding a
expected and evident signs of new structure.
distress and/or failure was not
observed.
10 Walls— Gravity The existing 2x wood stud walls Provide infill stud framing where
Support for the exterior and interior are existing studs are deteriorated,
adequate to support the vertical damaged or excessively notched.
loads to the structure, provided Provide additional stud framing around
the studs are not more than one openings (king and trimmer studs).
story tall, not deteriorated or Where studs exceed one story in
damaged, or significantly height, additional engineered wood
studs would be required or other
means to brace the wall.
11 Walls— Lateral The existing exterior 1x diagonal The exterior walls and selected interior
Support board sheathing is inadequate to walls will need to be retrofitted with
resist lateral loads and act as a plywood sheathing, straps and
shear wall (vertical resisting attached hold downs that will be
element). The existing required by design. Exterior walls can
construction does not have hold potentially be retrofitted from the
downs that are necessary to inside so that the exterior finishes
resist overturning (uplift) at the
could remain, if desired.
ends of shear walls.
12 Stairs - Interior The existing interior wood stairs All stairs should be demolished and
are in varied structural condition. rebuilt to meet current code
The stairs were not checked for requirements. Conventional wood
current code compliance for framed stringers, treads, and landings
required rise/run of treads. methods will be used.
13 Stairs - Exterior The existing exterior stairs are All exterior stairs should be demolished
cast—in-place concrete. They are and rebuilt with cast-in-place concrete
extremely deteriorated and in to meet current code requirements.
some cases sloping due to
settlement. The stairs were not
checked for current code
compliance for required rise/run
of treads.
Page 6
207
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
CONDITION/RECOMMENDATION TABLE
BALTO BUILDING
Location/Area Condition Recommendation
1 Foundation — Exterior While much of the concrete stem . Expose the exterior side of
concrete walls are not visible to be evaluated, the concrete walls.
basement/stem walls the areas that are indicate that the . Patch and fill cracks with an
concrete has deteriorated epoxy grout on both sides of
substantially due to the continued the walls.
exposure to the wet marine . Apply a fiber reinforced
environment and the freeze/thaw polymer (FRP) on both sides
seasonal cycle. of the walls.
• Waterproof exterior side
Provide foundation drainage
system
2 Foundation - The exterior footings supporting the No retrofit anticipated
Exterior Footings building are not visible to be
evaluated. If the loads to the
foundations are not changed, the
footings are anticipated to perform
as re uired.
3 Foundation - The interior footings supporting No retrofit anticipated
Interior Footings wood posts and/or wood framed
walls were not all visible to be
evaluated. If the loads to the
foundations are not changed, the
footings are anticipated to perform
as required.
4 First Floor Framing The existing concrete floor appeared • Clean underside surface of
to be in adequate condition. concrete slab floor by sand
However, the concrete does show blasting.
signs of deterioration and due the • Patch and fill cracks with an
extended time of exposure to the epoxy grout.
marine environment, the condition of . Apply a fiber reinforced
any existing reinforcing steel would polymer (FRP) on underside
be speculative. of floor system to provide
some tension capacity.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current use,
the floor would need to be evaluated
to ensure it has the capacity to
support code required live loads
based on occupancy.
Page 7
208
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
5 Second Floor In general the floor joists are in
Framing adequate condition. During any
potential construction, damaged
joists should be replaced.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current use,
the floor would need to be evaluated
to ensure it has the capacity to
support code required live loads
based on occupancy.
6 Second Floor The diagonal 1x wood decking is not . Provide 5/8" thick plywood
Framing adequate. The decking does not sheathing over existing 1x
behave as a horizontal diaphragm to decking.
transfer lateral loads, such as wind . Screw sheathing to existing
and seismic to the vertical resisting decking and framing.
elements. • Repair/replace damaged,
rotten or missing 1x decking.
7 Roof Framing The roof framing for the entire Since failure of the roof structure
structure has areas of distress and members was observed, the entire
failure. The roof framing method roof structure should be removed
utilizing ridge board, rafters and and replaced with a new
collar ties, is a method that is no conventional framing system such
longer recognized as an acceptable as prefabricated trusses or ridge
framing method. beam and joist system.
8 Walls—Gravity The existing 2x wood stud walls for Provide infill stud framing where
Support the exterior and interior are existing studs are deteriorated,
adequate to support the vertical damaged or excessively notched.
loads to the structure, provided the Provide additional stud framing
studs are not more than one story around openings (king and trimmer
tall, not deteriorated or damaged, or studs). Where studs exceed one
significantly story in height, additional
engineered wood studs would be
required or other means to brace
the wall.
Page 8
209
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
9 Walls— Lateral The existing exterior 1x diagonal The exterior walls and selected
Support board sheathing is inadequate to interior walls will need to be
resist lateral loads and act as a retrofitted with plywood sheathing,
shear wall (vertical resisting straps and attached hold downs
element). The existing that will be required by design.
construction does not have hold Exterior walls can potentially be
downs that are necessary to resist retrofitted from the inside so that
overturning (uplift) at the ends of the exterior finishes could remain,
shear walls. if desired.
10 Stairs - Interior The existing interior wood stairs All stairs should be demolished and
are in varied structural condition. rebuilt to meet current code
The stairs were not checked for requirements. Conventional wood
current code compliance for framed stringers, treads, and
required rise/run of treads. landings methods will be used.
11 Stairs - Exterior The existing exterior stairs are cast All exterior stairs should be
—in-place concrete. They are demolished and rebuilt with cast-
extremely deteriorated and in some in-place concrete to meet current
cases sloping due to settlement. code requirements.
The stairs were not checked for
current code compliance for
required rise/run of treads.
Page 9
210
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
CONDITION/RECOMMENDATION TABLE
ARCADES
Location/Area Condition Recommendation
1 Foundation — Exterior While much of the concrete stem . Expose the exterior side of the
concrete walls are not visible to be concrete walls.
basement/stem walls evaluated, the areas that are . Patch and fill cracks with an
indicate that the concrete has epoxy grout on both sides of
deteriorated substantially due to the walls.
the continued exposure to the . Apply a fiber reinforced
wet marine environment and the polymer (FRP) on both sides of
freeze/thaw seasonal cycle. the walls.
• Waterproof exterior side
Provide foundation drainage
system
2 Foundation - Exterior The exterior footings supporting No retrofit anticipated
Footings the building are not visible to be
evaluated. If the loads to the
foundations are not changed, the
footings are anticipated to
perform as required.
3 First Floor Framing In general the floor joists are in Decking over wood joists will need
adequate condition. During any to be replaced with plywood
potential construction, damaged sheathing.
joists should be replaced.
If loading criteria changes to the
floor structure from its current
use, the floor would need to be
evaluated to ensure it has the
capacity to support code
required live loads based on
occupancy.
4 Roof Framing The roof framing for the entire Since failure of the roof structure
structure has areas of distress members was observed in the main
and failure. The roof framing building structure, the entire roof
method utilizing ridge board, structure should be removed and
rafters and collar ties, is a replaced with a new conventional
method that is no longer framing system such as
recognized as an acceptable prefabricated trusses or ridge beam
framing method. and joist system.
Page 10
211
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc. July 8, 2011
Structural Condition Assessment
Jesse Lee Home(Jewell Guard and Balto Buildings)
Seward,Alaska
STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT
GUIDELINES REGARDING THE USE OF THIS REPORT
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Friends of Jesse Lee Home, LLC. The professional
opinions and recommendations provided in this report are based on site observations and knowledge of
the existing structures. All of the information herein is subject to some degree of interpretation and
possible modification. Structural calculations were not performed to determine the theoretical load-
carrying capacity or to evaluate the stability of the existing structure. These recommendations are
provided as an attempt to reduce life safety concerns and to limit the potential future failure of elements
and the structure until permanent repairs can be properly designed and implemented. The structures,
even with temporary shoring installed, will likely not be able to withstand catastrophic events, such as
earthquakes, sustained strong winds or heavy snow. These structures should be considered dangerous
with structural members failing and over-stressed due to extensive deterioration due to weather
exposure.
Prepared by:
Jeffrey S. Robertson, P.E.
Schneider &Associates Structural Engineers, Inc.
Page 11
212
Sponsored by: 11unt
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2014-059
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD,
ALASKA, ENTERING INTO A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
("AGREEMENT") BETWEEN THE CITY OF SEWARD AND THE
FRIENDS OF THE JESSE LEE HOME, DISPOSING OF PROPERTY AT
LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE TO A NONPROFIT
CORPORATION, FOR LOTS 15A AND 15B, JESSE LEE HOME
HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO. 4 ACCORDING TO PLAT 89-
18, FOR USE AS A PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL
BOARDING SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the Seller owns the Jesse Lee Home property ("Property," defined below)
that is the subject of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, since 2005 the Buyer has been working pursuant to City of Seward
Resolution 2005-01 and City of Seward Resolution 2005-83 to obtain funding for the
rehabilitation and development of the Property as an educational and residential/ boarding
facility; and
WHEREAS, Buyer has already coordinated valuable improvements to the Property,
including but not limited to Structural Stabilization, Roof Protection & Repairs, Phase I
Environmental Assessment, Hazmat Study, Surveying, Structural Analysis and Architectural
Design; and
WHEREAS, the property was appraised by MacSwain Associates LLC. in 2011 and the
two parcels were valued at$470,000 for the raw land; and
WHEREAS, since repossessing the property in 2001 the City has paid $264,958 in back
taxes and utility assessments, plus untallied administrative, maintenance and risk control costs;
and
WHEREAS, the assessed value of the property has decreased over time as the property
has deteriorated; and
WHEREAS, Buyer has supported $33,125.51 for the Environmental Study, Hazmat
Study, and survey work and has agreed to provide additional improvements totaling$290,750 as
consideration toward the purchase of the property; and
WHEREAS, the Buyer wishes to acquire, rehabilitate and develop the Property for use
as a public educational and residential/boarding school; and
WHEREAS, the Buyer intends to submit an application to the Kenai Peninsula Borough
School District for a charter school; and
213
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2014-059
WHEREAS,the Property requires significant physical improvements to be used for such
purposes, and such uses also require that governmental permits and approvals be granted; and
WHEREAS, development of the Property by the Buyer as an educational and
residential/boarding school will be a public benefit; and
WHEREAS, the educational and residential/boarding school will have a net positive
economic development impact for the community including short and long-term employment;
and
WHEREAS,Buyer is uniquely situated and able to redevelop the Property; and
WHEREAS, it is in the City's best interest to dispose of these properties in the manner
described in the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement, to transfer the risk and liability of the
abandoned Properties and the responsibility for necessary site hazardous materials disposal and
abatement to the Buyer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA that:
Section 1. The City of Seward hereby authorizes the City Manager pursuant to SCC
7.05.120 and 7.05.150 to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of properties
referenced as 15A and 15B, Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision Addition No. 4 according to Plat 89
18, Seward Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska to the Friends of the Jesse
Lee Home for less than fair market value.
Section 2. The Friends of the Jesse Lee Home agree to complete at least $290,750 in
future long-term site improvements and to pay all closing costs and fees for said property as
consideration to the City for the properties.
Section 3. The Seward City Council finds the disposal of these properties as described in
the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement to be in the best interests of the citizens of the City of
Seward and that the public interest will be served by disposing of the property interest for less
than the appraised fair market value, in accordance with the recitals above which are
incorporated herein.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect thirty (30)days after passage and posting.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska,this 28t" day of
July, 2014.
214
CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
RESOLUTION 2014-059
THE CITY OF SEWARD,ALASKA
- p
Jean Bardarson,Mayor
AYES: Keil, Casagranda, Terry, Squires, Butts, Darling, Bardarson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
jk&it
hanna Ki y, 1 C
Clerk
(City Seal)
�.y pF SE
�•�V�.?c,�ter
- • = SEAL •
215
Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: July 28, 2014
Through: Jim Hunt, City Manager
From: Ron Long,AssistantPrIt
Development Direct t�ffl
&Community
Agenda Item: To enter into a purchase and sale agreement
between the City of Seward and the Friends of the Jesse Lee Home,disposing of
Property at less than fair market value to a nonprofit corporation, for lots 15A
and 15B,Jesse Lee Home Heights Subdivision Addition No.4 according to Plat
89-18
BACKGROUND &JUSTIF>(('ATrnN
The Jesse Lee Home is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and has been identified b the
Seward Historic Preservation Commission,Planning and Zoning Commission Y
ouncils
and the State of Alaska as a property that should be preserved and rehabilitated. The C tytof Seward
acquired the Jesse Lee Home property through a foreclosure action in 2001 after previous private
preservation efforts failed. The Friends of the Jesse Lee Home (FJLH) was formed to preserve the
property as an education facility and has since worked to obtain funding for the rehabilitation and
development of the Property and to develop a business model that can sustainably operate the property
as an educational and residential/boarding school.
The property was appraised by MacSwain Associates LLC in 2011 and the two parcels were valued at
$470,000 for the raw land. The Kenai Peninsula Borough assesses the properties' value at$193,500.
The City's cost basis in the property is $264,958 paid in back taxes and assessments, plus untallied
administrative, maintenance, and risk control costs. FJLH has coordinated$33,125 in environmental
studies, HAZMAT assessments and survey work that estimate the costs of HAZMAT abatement at
$216,000. Actual costs may be more, and other costs would be necessary to make the property
marketable for other uses.
FJLH wishes to acquire, rehabilitate and develop the Property for use as a public educational and
residential/boarding school. The Friends of the Jesse Lee Home intend to submit an application to the
Kenai Peninsula Borough School District for a charter school.The Property requires significant physical
improvements to be used for such purposes, and such uses also require that governmental permits and
approvals be granted.
The City recognizes that in its current state the property is more of a liability than an asset to the City,
and that FJLH is uniquely situated as the most likely entity to bring the property back to a viable state
that will restore the public purpose and maintain the historic significance of the property.
FJLH has coordinated significant funding towards the project,has done considerable architectural and
engineering work already, and now needs to gain site control before beginning the major work of
restoration and development. Yet more funding is needed to complete the project;FJLH will exhaust all
efforts to ensure the project succeeds but there is no guarantee that a source can be found or that the
project will actually be completed.The Friends of the Jesse Lee Home and the City administration have
negotiated the attached Purchase and Sale agreement that attempts to further the Friends'objectives and
the City's desire to see the project succeed but at the same time ensure that if it does not,that the City
1
216
will at least take back ownership of a developable and sellable property.
The agreement prioritizes the HAZMAT abatement and environmental cleanup work andprovides
reasonable timeline to complete that work.The City receives no cash in this agreement,and this is a le
than fair market value transaction. As consideration, the City acce is the pnne a
improvements as described in the Purchase and Sale Agreement,at the timeline benchmarks less
p $290,500 of planned
be of good value and in the public's interest. Additionally, a reversionary clause endures
therein,to
project to ensure that if the property is used for an with the
condition to the transaction (use as a public educational oand residential boarding ng that which tsc ool)he City,owner h a
goes back to the City. ship
Development of the Property by the Buyer as an educational and residential/boardin facility
Public benefit. The educational and residential/ boarding school will have a positive economic
development impact for the community including short and long-term g y will be a
Jesse Lee Home is uniquely situated and able to redevelop the Property.
gterm employment.The Friends of the
This Agreement is in the city's best interest to dispose of unused land and provide necessary site
improvements to make the property an asset to the community and not a continuing liability.
INTENT: To dispose of property at less than fair market value as described in the
Purchase and Sale Agreement. e Resolution and
CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST:
Yes No N/A
Comprehensive Plan (p. 9):Cultural Facilities- Options refurbishing the
1. Jesse Lee Home per Historic Structure Report; 3.9.1.2—Encourage the X
reco nition, rehabilitation and preservation of .historic structures...
2. Strategic Plan (document source here):
X
3 Other(list): SPHC, P&Z and City Council Resolutions of support;
National Register of Historic Places listing X
FISCAL NOTE: No money changes hands in this transaction. The Friends of the Jesse Lee Home
agrees to pay all closing costs and fees. The City has written off the costs to acquire the property in
previous budgets. Transfer of ownership will reduce the City's liability for an attractive nuisance
property. Ownership by a non-profit entity will maintain the tax-exempt status of the property.
Approved by Finance Department: '? 4A�a�
ATTORNEY REVIEW: Yes X No
RECOMMENDATION:
To authorize the City Manager to execute the Purchase Agreement for the property referenced as 15A
and 15B, Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision Addition No. 4 according to Plat 89-18, Seward Recording
District,Third Judicial District, State of Alaska with the Friends of the Jesse Lee Home as a less than
fair market transaction in substantial form as described in the attached Purchase and Sale agreement to
facilitate the use of the property as a public educational and residential/boarding facility.
217