HomeMy WebLinkAbout02022021 Planning & Zoning PacketCity of Seward
Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting- Virtual
February 2, 2021
7:00 PM
The Public may observe and participate in the following meetings via Zoom.
6:00 — 6:50PM --Planning and Zoning joint work session with Historic
Preservation
Topic "Review Seward's Historic District and Possible Ways to Update Code"
7:00 PM Planning and Zoning Regular meeting
Please note that the Planning & Zoning and Historic Commissioners will not be
present at City Hall.
When: February, 2, 2021 06:00
PM
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https: f lzoom.us or
by telephone
Dial 1-253-215-8782 or 1-888-788-0099 (toll free)
Webinar ID: 925 8140 1316
Passcode: 144149
The Public is strongly encouraged to participate.
Public Comment: Callers will be placed in a queue and calls will be answered in the order in
which they were received once public comment begins.
Seward Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting
Joint Work session with Historic Preservation 6: 00 p.m.
February 2, 2021 7: 00 p.m. City Council Chambers,
410 Adams Street
Cindy Ecklund
Chair
Term Expires 02123
Tom Swann
Vice -Chair
Term Expires 02122
Gary Seese
Commissioner
Term Expires 02122
Craig Ambrosiani
Commissioner
Term Expires 02122
Nathaniel Charbonneau
Commissioner
Term Expires 02121
Kelli Hatfield
Commissioner
Term Expires 02121
Vanessa Verhey
Commissioner
Term Expires 02123
Norm Regis
Acting City Manager
Jackie C. Wilde
Community Development
Director
Andy Bacon
Planning Assistant
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Citizens' Comments on any subject except those items
scheduled for public hearing. [Those who have signed in
will be given the first opportunity to speak. Time is limited to
3 minutes per speaker and 36 minutes total time for this
agenda item]
5. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda. [Approval of
Consent Agenda passes all routine items indicated by asterisk
(*). Consent Agenda items are not considered separately
unless a Commissioner so requests. In the event of such a
request, the item is returned to the Regular Agenda.]
6. Special Reports & Presentations
A. City Administration Report
B. Other Reports, Announcements & Presentations
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda
February 2, 2021
7. Public Hearings [Limit comments to 5 minutes. Those who have signed in will be given
the first opportunity to speak]
A. Unfinished Business Items requiring a Public Hearing - None
B. New Business Items requiring a Public Hearing
1. Resolution 2021-01 Recommending City Council And Kenai Peninsula
Borough Approval Of The City Owned: Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision,
Seward Marine Industrial Center, Polar Seafood Lease Lots; A Replat Of Lots
1A And 1B Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision, Seward Marine Industrial
Center Polar Seafoods Replat; Located Within The Industrial (1) Zoning
District........................................................................................Page 3
8. Unfinished Business
9. New Business
1. Discuss planning and Zoning Priorities from April 2021 to April 2022 ............... Page 14
2. Approve 2021 Planning and Zoning meeting calendar ......................................... Page 17
3. Set February 16 Work session Topic as: Discuss possible code changes regarding
Dwellings, Housing, and Short -Term Rentals
4. Discuss scheduling a work session to review the Municipal Lands Management Plan
5. 2021 Planning Conference Notice......................................................... Page 19
6. * Approval of December 1, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes ................................. Page 21
7. * Approval of December 15, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes ................................ Page 26
10. Informational Items and Reports (No action required) -
A. Planning and Zoning Commissioner Newsletter ...................................... Page 31
B. FEMA Region X News................................................................................ Page 33
C. 2021 Planning & Zoning Meeting Schedule .............................................. Page 34
D. City Calendars......................................................................................... Page 37
11. Commission Comments
12. Citizens' Comments [Limit to 5 minutes per individual Each individual has one
opportunity to speak]
13. Commissions and Administration Response to Citizens' Comments
14. Adjournment
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda
February 2, 2021
Sponsored by: Administration
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 2021-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL AND KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH APPROVAL OF THE
CITY OWNED: FOURTH OF JULY CREEK SUBDIVISION, SEWARD
MARINE INDUSTRIAL CENTER, POLAR SEAFOOD LEASE LOTS; A
REPLAT OF LOTS IA AND 1B FOURTH OF JULY CREEK
SUBDIVISION, SEWARD MARINE INDUSTRIAL CENTER POLAR
SEAFOODS REPLAT; LOCATED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL (1)
ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Enterprise Engineering, on behalf of the City of Seward, has submitted a preliminary
replat of City owned Block 9, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, to be known as Fourth of July Creek
Subdivision, Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Polar seafood Lease Lots; and
WHEREAS, this platting action subdivides Lot IA and Lot 2A, Block 9, Fourth of July Creek
Subdivision, SMIC, 2007-02; creating four (4) parcels to be located on the west side of Nash Road between
Morris Avenue and Mustang Avenue; involving approximately 3.8 acres; and
WHEREAS, the properties of this replat are located within the Industrial Zoning District (I); the
minimum lot size and lot width as required by City Code have been met; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this replat is to create a new lease parcel to support operations at the
Polar Seafoods processing plant; and
WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed the preliminary replat; and
WHEREAS, Block 9 is currently serviced by private roads, municipal water, sewer, electric and
other utilities; therefore no subdivision installation agreement shall be required; and
WHEREAS, the replat protects and provides easements for existing and planned utilities
throughout the replat area; and
WHEREAS, it is the Planning and Zoning Commission's responsibility to act in an advisory
capacity to the Seward City Council and the Kenai Peninsula Borough regarding subdivision plat proposals;
and
WHEREAS, all conditions required by Seward City Code § 16.01.015, Conditions to plat approval,
were met; the property owners and leaseholders within 300 feet of the requested replat were notified of the
proposed subdivision, and the property was posted with public notice signage.
3/39
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission
that:
Section 1. The Commission hereby recommends that, in accordance with Seward City Code
Section 16.01.015 (B), the City Council approve the submittal of the Fourth of July Creek Subdivision,
Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Polar seafood Lease Lots to the Kenai Peninsula Borough for
approval.
Section 2. The Commission further recommends Kenai Peninsula Borough approval of the Fourth
of July Creek Subdivision, Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Polar seafood Lease Lots.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission this 2nd day of
February 2021.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VACANT:
ATTEST:
Brenda Ballou, MMC
City Clerk
(City Seal)
THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
Cindy L. Ecklund, Chair
4/39
P&Z Agenda Statement
Meeting Date:
February 2, 2020
To:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Through
%�
Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development Director( /
1�',/
From:
Andy Bacon, Planning Assistant
Agenda Item:
Resolution 202 1 -01 recommending City Council and Kenai Peninsula Borough
approval of the Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, Seward Marine Industrial
Center, Polar Seafood Lease Lots replat
BACKGROUNI) & JUSTIFICATION:
Attached for the Commission's review and recommendation to City Council and the Kenai Peninsula
Borough Planning Commission is a preliminary plat submitted by Enterprise Engineering, on behalf of
the City of Seward. In accordance with Seward City Code (SCC) 16.01.015(B) "No preliminary plat of
City -owned property may he submitted to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission for
approval without the prior consent of the City."
This replat is located within the Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC). This platting action subdivides
Lot I A and Lot 2A, Block'9, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, SMIC, Plat no. 2007-02; creating four (4)
parcels; involving approximately 3.8 acres. The new parcels are located an the west side of Nash Road
between Morris Avenue and Mustang Avenue.
The purpose of this platting action is to crate a new lease parcel to support operations at the Polar
Seafoods fish processing plant, and to create a parcel to support operations for the US Coast Guard fast
response cutter.
SUBDIVISION REVIEW:
Zonln:
The replat is within the Industrial Zoning, Uislrict. Current development surrounding this replat includes
Jag Industrial & Marine Services, the Polar 5cal'oocls lish processing plant, newly constructed floats for
moorage, and the City boat storage yard and washdown pad parcels.
Utilities:
The replat area is currently serviced by roads, municipal water, sewer, and electric; no subdivision
installation agreement shall be required.
, xistinX Uses:
Block 9 currently contains the Polar Seafoods fish processing plant and :idlacent ccluipment storaHIc Anti
seasonal employee campground. A vacant parcel, currently known its I-ot l.\. contains i perking and
staging area servicing the newly constructed fisherman's float. The adjacent parcel to the north consists ol,
a staging area to serve the public crane.
Flood Zone:
A portion of these parcels, loc.itccl ilonx the \Gesdern jwopertN line. is lok:aled within the VE coastal high
hazard area flood zone.
CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST:
Yes
No
N/A
Seward 2030 Comprehensive Plan (approved by Council, 2017)
3.5 Port and Harbor Development (page 16)
1.
Section 3.5.1 Maintain a thriving port of Seward through harbor
X
improvements, infrastructure expansion, and implementation of management
Tans.
2.
Strategic Plan (1999)
X
Seward City Code:
16.01.015. Conditions to plat approval.
3.
b) No preliminary plat of city -owned property may be submitted to the Kenai
X
Peninsula Borough planning commission for approval without the prior
consent of the city -council.
Staff Comments:
Staff has reviewed the preliminary plat and no objections were reported.
Department
Comments
No Comment
N/A
Building Department
X
Electric Department
X
Harbor Department
X
Police Department
X
Public Works Department
X
Telecommunications
X
Public Comment:
Lease holders and property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed platting action were
notified of this public hearing. Public notice signs were posted on the property, and all other public
hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040 were complied with.
At the time of this publication the Community Development Department has received no public inquiries,
and staff provided additional information regarding the size and location of the subject parcel. If any
further correspondence is received after publication of this agenda statement, it will be presented as a lay
down item at the Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of Planning and Zoning Resolution 2021-01 recommending City Council
and Kenai Peninsula Borough approval of the Fourth of July, Seward Marine Industrial Center, Fourth of
July Creek Subdivision, Seward Marine Industrial Center, Polar Seafood Lease Lots replat
6/39
CO
At,
MUSTANG
Lr
0
ANN
rr
P&Z Resolution 2021-01 Location of proposed replat
Fourth of July Sub, SMIC
N
PDR�r c§e gTqaq I aqoLease 0 62.5 125 250 Feet
0 er urces prope�?P�s and aerial #
imagery do not overlay correctly. Map is to be used for Drawn By AB
orientation and reference purposes only.
7/39
o ohs �e
/ WMN
99M c�
v�wj uhl
- eg mg==o R ¢ os
rn y a& _ ;o>o�,a�-��-y.�`.� WWW]pc�°` $ �a�°z °�o �I�■ w a
d o� -_�� ��„ems C �' U�I'�"d0 � �9��05 0"5 ���• � � _ r
35
�Ml?J JA��cS o�a Mi U i"'s� w I�y�Q, ¢¢oS7o 3�3 z Ilia rt�a
Z 333 � 0 3
N N `§ aw p w woo= - Sao hl ra n
a
s d�
_ §
Wilt
its
Ila
g rvr�nat � vnlxoaaav wananva eo ssas gApy�m � $ I
I li I v I I
♦ I I I� I I
�I
PI ICI I `"qh � I
,�$�88Y �� `✓m� _ i -� 6v I
v o
g I
kk I /JI
I I I C I x I. I ♦ m �✓r[ e
J (a)sfi�lf
_____
_ ________________
_
sQ
w--1N3u5tlJ umin ,w w w iw3w3svi unun ,oz � w
_ ® ___ eH I - V
I � oh---------- ;8�_ -JII-- �oW _ __ —
I E IV
(a1re>fiz a.u,zo.los fa)sv t5z 3.u,zo.ws vmk
6
�'�e o (a),99'Ifi M,CO,COAO�
�h
-oal
zB7 - a g
lot o 3 5 0
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL FORM
[Z]PRELIMINARY PLAT n REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT (no fee required)
PHASED PRELIMINARY PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PRIVATE STREETS / GATED SUBDIVISION
— all requirements of chapter 20, excluding 20.30.210 and 20.50 apply and must be met.
SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME: must be a unique name, contact staff for assistance if needed.
IF'ourth of July Creek Subdivision Seward Marine Industrial Center Polar Spafond I Pac;p
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
legal description Lot to & Lot 2A, Black 9, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision Seward Manne Industrial Center Polar Seafoods Replat plat no 2007-2
Section Township,Range Sec. 34 T1 S R1 E SM AK
General area description End of Nash Road
City (if applicable) Seward I Total Acreage 3.849
SURVEYOR
Company Enterprise Engineering, Inc.
Contact Person: Stacy Wessel
Mailing Address: 2525 Gambell st Suite 201
City, state, zip Anchorage, AK 99503
Phone: (907) 563-3835
a -mail: wessels(d,)eeiteam.Com
PROPOSED WASTEWATER AND WATER SUPPLY
WASTEWATERE]on site[2]CityE]community WATERan site ZCity Ocommunity
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A preliminary plat application will be scheduled for the next available plat committee meeting
after a complete application has been received.
::1 1—full size paper copy
7 — reduced sized drawing (11 x 17)
preliminary plat NON-REFUNDABLE submittal fee 400
City Planning Commission minutes when located within city limits or Bridge Creek Watershed District
71 certificate to plat for ALL parcels included in the subdivision
:i documentation showing proof of signatory authority (partnerships, corporations, estates, trusts, etc.)
D ALL requirements of KPB 20.25.070 (see page 2 for checklist) and KPB 20.25,080
EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED TO PLATTING CODE: A letter, to be presented to the commission, with
substantial evidence justifying the requested exception and fully stating the grounds for the
exception request, and the facts relied upon, MUST be attached to this submittal.
1. 2. 3.
APPLICANT: SIGNATURES OF ALL LEGAL PROPERTY OWNERS ARE REQUIRED. Additional signature
sheets can be attached. When signing on behalf of another individual, estate, corporation, LLC,
partnership, etc., documentation is required to show authority of the individual(s) signing.
Contact KPB staff for clarification if needed.
OWNER(s)
Name (printed): Signature:
Phone: e-mail:
Name (printed): Signature:
Phone: I e-mail:
Name (printed): Signature:
Phone: I e-mail:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIVED BY DATE SUBMITTED KPB FILE #.
9139
The preliminary plat shall be drawn to scale of sufficient size to be clearly legible and shall clearly show the
following:
A.
Within the title block:
Not applicable
The required
to my plat.
information has
been shown/noted.
1.
Name of the subdivision which shall not be the same as an
existing city, town, tract, or subdivision of land in the
borough, of which a plat has been previously recorded, or
so nearly the same as to mislead the public or cause
confusion;
2.
Legal description, location, date, and total area in acres of
the proposed subdivision; and
3.
Name and address of owner(s), as shown on the KPB
records and the certificate to plat, and registered land
surveyor;
B.
North point;
C.
The location, width and name of existing or platted streets and
public ways, railroad rights -of -way, and other important features
such as section lines or political subdivisions or municipal
corporation boundaries abutting the subdivision;
D.
A vicinity map, drawn to scale showing location of proposed
subdivision, north arrow if different from plat orientation, township
and range, section lines, roads, political boundaries, and prominent
natural and manmade features, such as shorelines or streams;
E.
All parcels of land including those intended for private ownership
and those to be dedicated for public use or reserved in the deeds
for the use of all property owners in the proposed subdivision,
together with the purposes, conditions, or limitations of reservations
that could affect the subdivision;
F.
The names and widths of public streets and alleys and easements,
existing and proposed, within the subdivision;
G.
Status of adjacent lands, including names of subdivisions, lot lines,
block numbers, lot numbers, rights -of -way; or an indication that the
adjacent land is not subdivided;
H.
Approximate locations of areas subject to inundation, flooding, or
storm water overflow, the line of ordinary high water, wetlands
when adjacent to lakes or non -tidal streams, and the appropriate
study which identifies a floodplain, if applicable;
I.
Approximate locations of areas subject to tidal inundation and the
mean high water line;
J.
Block and lot numbering per KPB 20.60.140, approximate
dimensions and total numbers of proposed lots;
K.
Within the limits of incorporated cities, the approximate location of
known existing municipal wastewater and water mains, and other
utilities within the subdivision and immediately abutting thereto or a
statement from the city indicating which services are currently in
place and available to each lot in the subdivision;
L.
Contours at suitable intervals when any roads are to be dedicated
unless the planning director or commission finds evidence that road
grades will not exceed 6 percent on arterial streets, and 10 percent
on other streets;
M.
Approximate locations of slopes over 20 percent in grade and if
contours are shown, the areas of the contours that exceed 20
percent grade shall be clearly labeled as such;
N.
Apparent encroachments, with a statement indicating how the
encroachments will be resolved prior to final plat approval; and
O.
If the subdivision will be finalized in phases, all dedications for
through streets as required by KPB 20.30.030 must be included in
the first phase.
10/39
po
CL
LY C a U' �k tirl{SNtq 4�A
Q O
c O 5�
< O A. a
Ld
cr '� x
u, �a G
le
qj
x x s n€a 11f
W n 8 Q x
< #S pwc
pIDON aa-"os
4-i
I
M
988ZZt [,s8'6Z3. ^.,<a cS,SgN)
3<'SL M„bZ,4S.685
�LGL"St M..fiO,SS.64Nj
0
}uaueso3 .toMart(�fl Qu
o \
rJ 1,v mj d
sa
� ,io ZL04 (,Lo cZ6l 3,4tr,SL'o8kj Eul�ce8 to asog
✓� tt'aYi11
c + _
(anuaav 6unlsnjy) OY 101311
s
anuarav uos2Y1ar
I',
C
I
O
,ZZS Z M,0 6 &95
--
� LB
�"ry
atttN 11
S �
€zpi 5
'`
8 _
-a
_ Z j In
66> h
,£8"BOOI TT311„Ll.9 u,69N (,O8'800I M_44,9!,085) l0'00. � Is°M 6l uoryseS
0099 .£4944 tJ N aZ MkOf£o�19aSn,OS IS
00'OOt 9LlroZ MO6,F h,
M
,St FL
'rJ+ m I o,0090t s Og
� w 41.81o68N
,CO'SZY L4SZ,o95 � M � a ,� OaeSN C1 O m
V 8���� r 3,Sv,80.66N
I I I JeJ v
lit d3ijv i-din
i z m I
4)
_ I
� 90 s'Ztr
-__—_____'l--
z 107 4° Q Z 207
,9t14S 3„L4,SZ,SBN tr4trZt 3.La SZ„6HN I I ,6t S6I I
I
I
N
(}
.7
.9L't4£ 3,LY.SZo68ry I
I
i
I'
I
q I=
i
vlio
I
ml
I
N viler
I
I
I
i
I
,0tt4t 3„L4.SZ,68N
(mY rtuotmJ�J v (1-1L
F M.L4,SZ,68S
,OCSZOI 3.LV 9L 69N
84t
.IS"LLZ
_
.9..ttrf 3,L4,SZe68N
90
,501 0024£
.00"<Ztr .SZ
I
I
0 h ^
ioo
.'aC
?Op�
1\\[Y✓-'s}J
I
4L .SL
oil
hi z
N
y n o b
.00'<ZY ,6£Bbt
,00"Wl
9tIaC
,00'09
,40'90i WZ4f
at
uosa a
,LZ95S1 MOti ,09
M,L4,92,685
�
N
-t2
.58-9"i6
(,000Oit ,5656t tra'69L
1 Qyd
O v;
y "S
n
o ,-�
�\
a
,S6'6bt 3.10.LL„68N
bin�
sc3 3 asC��4 .OZ �I p ss s� ,OS
1
.r r
____--_N — —_
—
_
�j
^--rr
— __�__—____- —
—T — —
� ----- --'
°6ouio 6uV6c
j
�u°wesv3 e6vulvi9 yaa�Z 6u1�05 ,O8
6L SBZt
,19'B8Z
� Gb SLSt
-
3„L9.9Ze68N
fT
L4:OSt 3,.40,IS,668 t7
00
'i PQ
7111 L<SL
U
z O N,
_
$ U gel. u e Er N 5mU m„ w
} Q � CIE%
& a z3 0
a
> t1f z R Ed E N o E 5 0 J'•- ° N .ySC o z°
U
o
,6
��} � ,66'99C£ CLItSfC M,Ct,>C.ON1 6u;iga8 to atso8 (,8699tr M fI,OLON)
laa ilE uat/d IaU
'hxa<
a
Q LO _
T vv a� EvE
Q o�E"
�� netow
'pY L. h i
y 0�
e}
0
mQ�
ZN200000� G�� z E �° m
D SgtH
f
C
lT
V)
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 2, 2021
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development
Director
Subject: Discuss the Planning and Zoning priorities in preparation for Council and Board
joint work session.
BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council hold an annual joint work session to
discuss and set priorities for the coming year.
The 2020 Planning and Zoning Priorities are attached. Annually, priorities are proposed by the
Commission and confirmed by Council. Please review and discuss recommendations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission review 2020 Planning and Zoning Priorities information and
make any changes they deem necessary in preparation for the joint work session with Council.
14/39
Sponsored by: Planning and Zoning Commission
CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 2020-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE SEWARD PLANNING AND ZONI\i
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALA,-,d,,: ",�,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF 1-I-1 F.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PRIORITIES FR[t -1
APRIL 2020 TO APRIL 2021
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Seward City Council
held a joint work session. reviewed and updated the Planning and Zoning annual
Priorities List on February 25, 20210; and.
WHEREAS, the Seward City Council Rules of Procedure, adopted March 14.
1994, state that the Council should meet in an annual ,joint work session with the
Commission to address areas of mutual concern; and
WHEREAS, Council will address a resolution adopting these recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Seward Planning and Toning
Commission that:
Section 1. The following list of priorities with status updates and timelines is
licrei v recommended to the City Council for approval:
11'RI L Zt12ti '1'C1 AP1tI L wt121 PRIORITIES
Short and .Medium Term
I ) Review/ Update all of Title 15
2) Support Council in exploring available funding / policy for infrastructure development
(hold jointly with City council. if possible)
3) Current planning and zoning, including the subdivision of land
4) Provide research, analysis, and insights in an accessible and straightforward way on
current topics — including demographics, housing, lodging, economic development.
resiliency and sustainability.
5) Promote public interest and understanding of the comprehensive plan and review process
6) Communication tower education / work session with an industry expert. and recommend
draft ordinance to Council
15/39
Continuing
1) l.00k at current and future community needs to identify a %vide range of strategies and
investments that support the neighborhood's growth and ` itality.
2) Ground truthing of City for Comprehensives Plan
3) Continue to pursue compliance with the Seward C'it; %oning Cade by prioritizing the
outstanding health and safety issues, such as snow removal, illegal camping, junk
vehicles. etc. --This is are ongohi q revieu,
4) Identify and implement land use and zoning changes as well as other actions needed to
support the short-term rccovery and long-term vitality of City
5) Se%vard Marine Industrial Centex' new zoning district
6) Fort Raymond Property planning and platting, (former USAF Rec. Camp)
7) Did You Know Code Education
8) Planning &, Zoning Commissioner training
a. Seek additional training funding if possible
Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Seward Planning and. Zoning
Commission this 2nd day of June. 2020.
THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA
Cind ' . Ec und. Chair
AYES: Hatfield, Swann, DeMoss, Ambrosiani, Seese, Charbonneau, Ecklund
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VACANT:
ATTEST:
Brenda Ballou, NIMC
City Cleric
rr�rrwrr,rr��
of Szk,
�+ w
SEALci`'1)
�-+- i
�y r
OF AV'
�' ..
0"F00260r 40
16/39
Memorandum
CITY OF SEWARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Date: February 2, 2021
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
Through: Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development Director
From: Andy Bacon, Planning Assistant
Subject: 2021 - Planning & Zoning Meeting Schedule
This memo is to provide a schedule of the Planning & Zoning Commission Meetings for the calendar year 2021. Unless
otherwise noted the P & Z regular meetings will begin at 7:00 p.m. P & Z work sessions will begin at 6:00 p.m The
Planning and Zoning Commission will be holding more joint work sessions with other board and commissions in 2021,
and these are reflected on the color chart below:
Regular Meetings begin at 7
Joint Work Sessions with the Historic
p.m. in City Council Chambers:
p.
City Council Meetings begin at 7 p.m. in Gitv Pre=erra-ic : :c�-n =sicr at 6 o.i- and are
Q Adams Street, City Hall.
ty
Council Chambers, 410 Adams Street, City follev.-ed ,�. he F an-inc anc Zoning
Hall. Commisson ret_larmee:inc at, a.�.
Work Sessions begin 6 m.
g P
Joint Work Sessions with the Seward f Bear
Greek Flood Service Area Board at 6 p.m. and Joint Work Sessions ,::h :he Port and
in City Council Chambers, 410
v
are followed by the Planning and Zoning �-m111Crce Ad:i4jlv E and a- o r M.
Adams Street, City Hall.
Commission regular meeting at 7 p.m.
A draft copy of the proposed 2021 meeting schedule is included under Informational Items and Reports: Page 35
17/39
W
L �
U)
LL
w�
yy 4 N
0
0
U)
ca
c)
LL
._
_F-
F �L
a�
r Q
CV F-
[V 2
Ili
LL
7
U)
INNIMIN
MIIMMIII
M11MMIN
Nommmil
BEENE
BONN
11MIMIN
mulmmill
MINNIE
ISEMIN
Cammmil
MINMEMI
11111
IN
I
oil
III
MIN
INNIMINIMINSIMINISINNIMI
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
Ilill
I
I
M
11
I
M
I
11
M
I
I
N...
ME
Boom
INNIMIN
NOMMMIN
Mims
MINI
111NIMI
21111111
lammill
CMIMMIN
MEMMMI
NOMMMIN11I1
NN
N
M
M
I
I
MIN
MNOMMMIN
MINI111MMINIMINIMMM11MINIMIN
slim11MIMIN
I
1
WIN
21111111
11mmmil
Cammill
1113ml
11
gill
IN
m
m
0MQ,
CCL
Cr
V E
d Q
a7 N Itf
(U
C
0
N
_ C E
C m
OEm
20
E
0.0
0Ut m
m�
�0>,❑
��
O 2M N
O ,
�Lo
�(U
0�
•O0
�F
5 0
D_ a U
U
L
U
m M
U
E I)
v L
aaa)i
Al
� �N
n:
C
f� N
C E
M
CD ra
y 0
a1�
�.z
y�
c
3 ai
E
cQd
a�
�
�E
s
E
C
0C)
i 0 ,°
Oa30
0-�
o.N
u C
y SC o f
—_�
VC)�U
ICU
o
E
N
_
�_
L
cn
�UU
a�E=
L t'
c �
L
0UU]
W 7, N
0
fA
�v E
s ."^.
ayi ❑�
N
cp
(D E�
oU-0
IX CL
Q
Save the Date
2021 Alaska
Planning
Conference
February
23-25, 2021
Mark your calendars for our
virtual annual planning
conference!
Call for sessions and more
information coming soon 19/39
A
Ln
in
O
F
Lu
Ao
bA
r-
O 'E
c
C
0 no
to
s
C
M
CL
O
E
r4 E E E
IR r,4
0 g <
< Lui a v t
(D 5 co
m Gi
4p m 41 14
E .2 r;
co R-1 In o = t
L, , L4 R Lm
c Q m RE
C, qu
- ZlJ u
Sr
2,
o
Ou cu r
z LILI L;
T; 'M -4';
FG4(5 z
. . ......... . ....... . ...... .... . ..... . ....... . ....... . ....... . ....... . ...... ...... . ...... . ..... . ..... .... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ..... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ..... . ..... . ....
r
a u
m
LA
0
Z
LA
tt" m Q& i
6.6 CL
- q - z , < -M
z E E
u E
LM S
In
C
0 -0
u ro
cc LU Liz m
m c E
p x 0 w r
.... ............ .......... . ......... ...... . ....... ..... . ...... . ...... . ...... L ...... . ...... ... . ......... . ......... . ......
E rm
0
iv
aj r
a -0 r
< r u
ri
Ln
E
Ili 16P r
aj he Qoj 2
r
aj cc -E
Me E
a tv -a fm m m It -r-
U ,a uS
CL a
aal .2 .2 o
'I m
ILI -M
CL -Y C m AP
-COL I A A
. . ......... . ......... . ...... . ...... . ..... . ...... . ... ..... . ....... . ........ . ......... ....... ..........
0
ID X
0
;-A
E
E f 4 0-
o
2t: 2 8
m Qj
CALL TO ORDER
The December 1, 2020 meeting of the Seward Planning & Zoning Commission was
called to order at 7:00 p-m. by Chair Cindy Ecklund.
OPENING CEREMONY
Commissioner Charbonneau led the pledge of allegiance to the flag
ROLL CALL
There were present:
Cindy Ecklund presiding, and
Tom Swann Gary Seese Kelli Hatfield
Craig Ambrosiani Nathanial Charbonneau
Comprising a quorum of the Board; and
Also Present
Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development Director
Eric Kozielski, Planner
All public testimony was delivered either in writing or telephonically at this meeting
CITIZENS' COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED
FOR PUBLIC HEARING - none
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Motion (Swann/Hatfield) Approve the agenda and consent agenda
Chair Ecklund pulled the November 3, 2020 minutes off the consent agenda
Motion Passed
AYES: Charbonneau Swann, Ambrosiani,
Seese, Hatfield, Ecklund
NOES: none
SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
Administration Report
Jackie Wilde thanked the MIS department for their assistance in migrating public meetings over
to the Zoom platform. Wilde stated that Planner Kozielski's last day at work was approaching, and
that he will be missed.
Other Reports, Announcements, and Presentations - None
21 /39M
Unfinished Business Items requiring a Public Hearing
Resolution 2020-12 of the Seward Planning And Zoning Commission, Recommending That
The City Council Amend. The Land Use Plan And Zoning Designation Of Lots 15A And 15B,
Of Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision Addition No. 4 With The Physical Address of 101 & 105
Benson Drive From Multi -Family Residential (R3) To Park (P)
Wilde stated that she has written citizen comments to read into the record, and has presented a
laydown of the public comments received in the recent survey so that those may be retained in the
record. This item is being brought back for public hearing from the November 3, 2020 meeting
after the Commission requested more public input on the zoning change. A work session was held
on December 1, and an online survey was distributed receiving approximately 160 comments.
Chair Ecklund opened public hearing on this item.
Christy Audette Bagula, inside city, discussed the historic use of the property as an orphanage
and stated that it would be a shame to see the area developed with apartment buildings, and
supported a plan to convert the area to a memorial and a park.
Sharyl Seese, inside city, stated that she supports the resolution as written. Seese stated that she
supported construction of a gazebo with interpretive panels telling the story of the Jesse Lee Home.
Sara Walker, outside city, stated that she is with the HYPER group, and that she I not in support
of a park because she has two young kids and they need a place to play indoors. Walker stated that
her dream is to build a childcare facility, a daycare, and a museum. Walker was in support of doing
something for the kids, but not an outdoor park.
Nicole Lawrence, outside city, stated that she has heard a lot of great ideas of how the land should
be used, and that it should honor the JLH and the children who lived there. Stated that this area
was a high -density housing area and that it would be nice to have a green space for the area
residents to use. Lawrence pointed out that contrary to what many were saying, if a portion of the
land were to be designated for housing development, that it would not necessarily become section
8 multi -family housing. Lawrence emphasized the importance of honoring the history of the site,
and stated that it would be beneficial to the City to sell some of the land for the purpose of building
more housing.
Liz DeMoss, inside city, stated that it seemed that most people wanted this to remain a green space,
but noted that there were still housing issues with quality single family homes being available in
Seward. DeMoss noted that the City may have other lands available to sell for housing
development, and stated that she supports the resolution as written.
Tanguy Libbrecht, outside city, stated that he supports the park designation, and looks forward
to hearing further conversation on how the land gets developed. Libbrecht thanked the
Commission for their work.
22/39
Chair Ecklund closed public hearing.
Motion (Chaz•bonneau/Ambrosiani) Approve Resolution 2020-12 Of The
Seward Planning And Zoning
Commission, Recommending That The
City Council Amend The Land Use Plan
And Zoning Designation Of Lots 15a And
15b, Of Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision
Addition No 4 With The Physical Address
Of 101& 105 Benson Drive From Multi -
Family Residential (R3) To Park (P)
Charbonneau asked if a zoning change to Park would affect any of the development ideas heard,
such as museum or child care center, to which Wilde replied that if a development proposal was
brought forward that did not fit with the Park designation a section of the property could always
be rezoned to fit the proposal. Ecklund and Ambrosiani asked if a community center or child
care center were already allowed in Park.
Ecklund relaxed the rules to ask questions of Sara Walker.
In response to Ecklund, Walker stated that her group was not interested in purchasing the land,
but was more interested in leasing it or partnering with the City to develop the child care center
and museum. Walker stated that her group was latnching a website in January and was planning
a family needs survey. Walker stated that a 2020 survey conducted by her group found that a large
number of respondents weren't satisfied with the child care options in Seward.
Ecklund went back on the rules
Wilde provided the Commission with land uses allowed in Park zoning. Hatfield stated that she
has concerns with rezoning the entirety- of the land as a park, and predicted that given the economic
situation the lot would likely be empty for years to come. Hatfield noted that the housing market
already contained many newly developed multifamily and studio dwelling units, and discussed the
need for more suigle-family homes. Hatfield discussed selling; a portion of he land for housing
development as a means to raise money for developing the park and memorial. Swann stated that
from a public point of view it is more difficult to change back from Park to another residential use
later in time. Swann stated that what is not known is the amount of leftover grant funds from
demolition, and how those may be used to fiord the development of the park and memorial. Swann
stated that knowing how much funduug was leftover would better inform the Commission of how
they should plan future use of the land.
Motion (SwannfHatfield) Postpone Resolution 2020-12 until
demolition of the Jesse Lee home is
completed.
Ecklund asked administration about the demolition timeline. Wilde stated that because the City
was delayed in demolishing the building, they were up against a tight deadline to spend funds by
June 30, 2021. Wilde stated that by code, a memorial had to be built in the Park zoning district.
Ecklund asked if the state could not be petitioned to move the deadline forward due to the delay
caused by the Title dispute, to which Wilde replied that the City had already asked and that if the
23/39
funds are not spent then they would return to the States general fund. Swann stated that he would
like to rescind his motion, and Hatfield agreed. Ambrosiani asked what permanent structures
could be placed on the property, which may inhibit future development for other purposes, and the
commission discussed possible land uses. Ecklund discussed leaving the platted lots as they are,
rezoning Lot 15B to park, and leaving Lot 15A available for housing development. and asked the
commission for their thoughts on that. Hatfield concurred with that, but noting the public concerns
with density in the area, recommended rezoning Lot 15A to R1 for lower density development.
Commissioners discussed using the Lot 15A for various types of housing. Swann stated that if the
land were developed with a pavilion, or other public use amenities, it would be better to have more
land as a buffer between the adjoining dwellings in the area. Ambrosiani noted that this area was
the highest density housing area in town, and that the neighborhood needed recreation spaces for
kids, discussing such items as a recreation center or a pool, being attractive for bringing new
families to town. Wilde stated that these uses would be allowed by CUP in the Park zoning district.
Ecklund moved to amend the resolution to rezone .66 acres of the subject property to Park, and
rezone the remaining 2 acres to R2. Wilde called a point of order, stating that the proposed
amendment would need to be re -noticed to the public, specifying that the proposed amendment
would be too significant a change to the resolution that went out for public notice. Ecklund's
motion failed for lack of a second. Swann stated that he originally would have been in favor of
dividing the property to allow for more housing, but upon hearing discussion is now in favor of
turning the whole parcel into a park for the purpose of creating a public space. Swarm stared that
he is in favor of passing the resolution as written. Hatfield asked what might happen if the land
were to remain zoned R3, specifically if the Council could move ahead and sell the property.
Ecklund stated that the municipal land management plane recommended dividing the property
and selling it to a party with a sound development plan.
Main Motion Passed AYES: Hatfield, Swann, Seese,
Charbonneau, Ambrosiani
NOES: Ecklund
Set Work Session Topic for December 15, 2020
Commission set a one -hour work session to discuss Dwelling definitions on December 15, 2020
Commission scheduled a special meeting for December 15, 2020
Approval of the November 3, 2020 meeting minutes
Ecklund stated that she recalled that Commission discussed conducting a survey on the Jesse Lee
Home, but there was no mention in the minutes of the Commission directing staff to conduct the
survey, which she felt would give more credence to the survey_ Wilde stated that the minutes would
be amended and brought back at the special meeting.
24/39
Commission Comments:
Ambrosiani- Thanked staff for their work on the survey
Charbonneau- thanked staff for their work on the survey, and wished Eric well in his future
endeavors
Swann- thanked the staff for setting up the meeting on Zoom
Ecklund- thanked the MIS and Community Development department for holding the meeting on
Zoom
Citizens' Comments:
Christy Audette Bagula, thanked the commission for being thoughtful and considerate of the
citizens comments, and thanked the staff who transcribed the all comments
Cheryl Seese, thanked the Commissioners and staff for their work on the Jesse Lee Home topic
Tanguy Libbrecht thanked staff and commission on the thoughtfiil process, and for listening to
the thoughts from the public. Libbrecht stated that there is a difficult balance that mist be achieved.
Commission and Administration Response to Citizens' Comments
Wilde stated that City staff were working on holding all subsequent public meetings on Zoom
Ecklund appreciated being able to conduct public business on Zoom
ADJOURNMENT (Charbonneau)
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 FM
Jackie C. Wilde Cindy L. Ecklund
Community Development Director Chair
(City Seal)
25/39
CALL TO ORDER
The December 15, 2020 special meeting of the Seward Planning & Zoning Commission
was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Cindy Ecklund.
OPENING CEREMONY
Commissioner Hatfield led the pledge of allegiance to the flag
ROLL CALL
There were present:
Cindy Ecklund presiding, and
Tom Swann Gary Seese Kelli Hatfield
Comprising a quorum of the Board; and
Also Present
Jackie C. Wilde, Community Development Director
Excused
Nathanial Charbonneau Craig Ambrosiani
All public testimony was delivered either in writing or telephonically at this meeting
CITIZENS' COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED
FOR PUBLIC HEARING - None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Motion (Swann/Hatfield)
Motion (Ecklund/Swann)
Motion Passed
Main Motion Passed
Approve the agenda and consent agenda
Add New Business item to schedule a
January 2021 Work session
AYES: Hatfield, Seese, Swann, Ecklund
NOES: none
AYES: Seese, Swann, Hatfield, Ecklund
NOES: none
November 3, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes were approved on the consent agenda
26/39
SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
Administration Report
Jackie Wilde stated that Planner Eric Kozielski's last day was December 11. Wilde stated that the
Community Development department was short staffed at this time. Wilde appreciated everyone
willing to use Zoom meetings, and thanked MIS for their help. In response to Ecklund, Wilde
stated that the Clerk has received no applicants for the vacant seat on the P&Z Commission.
Other Reports, Announcements, and Presentations - None
New Business Items requiring a Public Hearing
Resolution 2020-13 of the Seward Planning And Zoning Commission, Granting A
Conditional Use Permit To Blaine Bardarson For Storage In Place Of The Obi/Icicle
Employee Campground Units Located At 1607 Northwestern Circle Leirer Industrial
Subdivision Lot 2 Block 3, For The Purpose Of Maintenance And Renovation, In The
Industrial (I) Zoning District
Chair Ecklund opened public hearing on this item. Hearing no one wishing to speak, Chair
Ecklund closed public hearing and asked for the staff report.
Wilde stated that Blaine Bardarson has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the
Seward Planning and Zoning Commission to store in place the 36 temporary housing units
currently located at 1607 Northwestern Circle. Mr. Bardarson is the owner of the units and leases
them to Ocean Beauty/ Icicle (OBI) Seafood for their Employee Campground which requires
annual Conditional Use approval and Temporary Structure Permits. The land is leased by Ocean
Beauty/ Icicle (OBI) Seafood from Leirer Enterprises. Mr. Bardarson requested an exemption from
having to relocate the units off site this year. Staff was directed to have Mr. Bardarson apply for a
Conditional Use Permit so that he may, upon approval, store his units in place for the purposes of
maintenance and upgrades. The Temporary Structure Permits and Employee Campground CUP
has been renewed annually for 11 years. Of those years, exemptions were made 5 times for various
purposes. Temporary Structure permits are for a period of 180 days. As "Temporary Structure" is
explained in Section 3103 of the 2006 IBC, the amount of time erected not the time used is the
basis for its definition. Wilde discussed the surrounding land use and zoning and stated that all
requirements for public posting were complied with. Building department staff recommended the
following condition "The owner of the units shall bring the units and required foundation
anchoring up to current International Building Code and International Fire Code for permanent
structures within 1 year of the approval date. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Structural and
Architectural Stamped Engineered drawings shall be approved by the Building Official."
Motion (Seese/Swann) Approve Resolution 2020-13 Of The
Seward Planning And Zoning
Commission, Granting A Conditional Use
Permit To Blaine Bardarson For Storage
In Place Of The Obi/Icicle Employee
27/39
Campground Units Located At 1607
Northwestern Circle Leirer Industrial
Subdivision Lot 2 Block 3, For The
Purpose Of Maintenance And Renovation,
In The Industrial (I) Zoning District
Ecklund asked for clarification on the amount of time these structures would be allowed to remain
if Commission were to approve this resolution, to which Wilde replied that the applicant would
have one year to bring the camp up to IBC code standards in order to keep the structures there
permanently. Ecklund asked about some of the exemptions which allowed applicant to leave the
structures in place in excess of 180 days over the years. Fire Chief Clinton Crites was in
attendance to answer building code questions, and he provided background information on the IBC
regulations pertaining to temporary structures. In response to Ecklund, Crites stated that the
applicant had received written authorization in 2011 to leave the structures in place by building
official Squires for "one time only" in order to perform maintenance. The following year, Chief
Squires retired, and incoming Chief Athey allowed further exemptions for the purpose of
maintenance in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2019. Crites stated that these structures are in effect
permanent structures, and that the building code states that any structure remaining in place over
180 days, regardless of whether or not it is occupied, shall meet permanent structure requirements.
Crites outlined requirements that would need to be met through the building department to make
these structures permanent, and stated that the intention is to ensure consistent application of the
IBC which has been adopted by the City. Ecklund asked if annual health and safety inspections
would be conducted, to which Crites replied that these structures have been and will continue to
be inspected annually for health and safety. Crites discussed liability issues that the City potentially
faces with regard to these containers. Swann stated that these structures are meant to meet a
permanent need for annual employee housing for fisheries workers, and that the requirement to
move every 180 days encourages a more permanent type of employee housing development.
Swann acknowledged that there would be cost in bringing these up to code, and discussed the ease
in which a container could be bolted to a permanent foundation and connected to water and electric.
Seese thought the parties involved should be given a year's grace due to COVID related factors:
illness at the processing plant and a difficult fishing season. Swann stated that the party providing
the housing was separate from the parties involved in fishing and seafood processing. Ecklund
discussed possible alternatives, but that she agreed with the point that the original CUP should
have been followed all along, or the structures should have been made permanent. Ecklund stated
that if Commission votes yes on this resolution, the applicant has one year to bring these units up
to code, and that a no vote would require the applicant to move the structures now.
Main Motion Passed
AYES: Hatfield, Seese, Ecklund
NOES: Swann
Resolution 2020-14 Of The Seward Planning And Zoning Commission, Granting A Variance
From Seward City Code 15.10.220 Development Requirements To Philip Zimmerman,
Permitting An Exception To The Zoning Code To Allow For A Total Sign Area Greater
Than 32 Sgft For The Temporary Advertising Of The Gateway/ Phoenix Heights Subdivision
28/39
Located At 2004 Dunham Drive, Gateway Subdivision Addition 1 Lot 1 Block 3, In The
Multi -Family (R3) Zoning District
Wilde stated that the applicant is requesting a Variance to the Sign Code from the Seward Planning
and Zoning Commission to erect a temporary (up to 2 years) freestanding sign at 2004 Dunham
Drive, formerly known as Rush Loop. The proposed sign face exceeds the 32 square foot maximum
size allowed for freestanding signs in the R3 zoning district. The Commission is authorized to
grant special variances from the provisions of Chapter 15.20 in accordance with the conditions
described therein. Property owners within 300 feet of the subject property were notified of this
variance request and all other public hearing requirements were met.
Chair Ecklund opened public hearing on this item.
Wilde stated that a written comment was received from an adjoining property owner asking how
long the sign was intended to remain, to which Wile replied that the variance would last 2 years.
The commenter was satisfied with this answer and had no further concerns.
Chair Ecklund closed public hearing.
Motion (Hatfield/Swann) Approve Resolution 2020-14 Of The
Seward Planning And Zoning
Commission, Granting A Variance From
Seward City Code 15.10.220 Development
Requirements To Philip Zimmerman,
Permitting An Exception To The Zoning
Code To Allow For A Total Sign Area
Greater Than 32 Sgft For The Temporary
Advertising Of The Gateway/ Phoenix
Heights Subdivision Located At 2004
Dunham Drive, Gateway Subdivision
Addition 1 Lot 1 Block 3, In The Multi -
Family (R3) Zoning District
Hatfield stated that she had no concerns with the application but wondered if the applicant
intended to move the sign to a new location after two years, noting that it appeared to be a well
made and permanent looking sign. Wilde replied that the applicant had stated the sign would be
removed in two years, or when all properties in the subdivision were sold. Ecklund noted that the
sign was only slightly larger than what would have been allowed under code, but appreciated that
surrounding property owners were notified because of the public hearing requirement for this
particular sign. Swann stated that he appreciated the applicant going through the variance process
and also that he constructed a sign that was not an eyesore. Swann supported the granting of the
variance.
29/39
Motion Passed
AYES: Hatfield, Swann, Seese, Ecklund
NOES:
Commission set the topic of the January 19, 2021 work session to discuss Title 15 Definitions for
Dwellings, Lodging, and Housing
Commission Comments:
Seese- Stated that he was proud of what Commission did tonight to help these people.
Ecklund- Stated that she hoped the Commission would not see another Conditional Use Permit
application for the permanent storage of temporary buildings for employee housing because she
recalled the Commission's discussion in 2009 on the original permit being strongly worded toward
the requirement that they be moved every year. Ecklund stated that the applicant should either
make the structures permanent or attempt to change the portion of code requiring annual removal.
Citizens' Comments: none
Commission and Administration Response to Citizens' Comments
Wilde stated that she has initiated a review of all previously issued Conditional Use Permits for
the purpose of determining any that need to be followed up on.
ADJOURNMENT (Swann)
The meeting was adjourned at 7:51 PM
Jackie C. Wilde
Community Development Director
(City Seal)
Cindy L. Ecklund
Chair
30/39
11�J[�►/\[�
Making Space for Tiny Houses
"Tiny house are attracting a lot of attention through social r,nedia, television shows, documentaries,
and stories in the popular press, Advocates often tout the affordability and environmental friendliness
of living in very small homes, Meanwhile, skeptics and detractors see a passing fad and caution against
embracing tiny houses as a distinct type of dwelling. Currently, many cities and counties have provisions
in their land -use and development regulations that make legal development and occupation of tiny
houses difficult or impossible. However, a small number of communities have made changes to their
codes to explicitly permit tiny -house living.
Background
While there is no ofli .I..II .ir: I1r.
. I I JI I1 k,I_ 111 _rs, pollce -v;_
:r :., .,I iu i,jvocat__ ._vl rD,dt-r al, sir lyle-
family dwelling with
'._r ..If
f .-t or less of I' _ ..Ir r . I_
., 'Inyhouse. In so! „contexts, commenta-
t,-.,;-oly apply the I,;:
-I111. '�.I h-itI,::,rmanent
f - , 11 l:ations• Hov\r-v
FI'Ie1
r,ta'ur I l' I
i-,. -nes, which
r may not l I
.,Iltto l <.
F),-,-)artment of .I,_, c.Ir .r•.I.I
Ili an Developme, I,,r r- .I. manu-
factl .'ed hoo, I a '4
CFR §y "
-'I ,- t - tl f - -r-- it I 1 .; =111
ri . -tryAssocia- ,,n's standar s for"park
mocI"recre•ir .-,r -.1 vrhf<
le (ANSI At 19-5).
I' rr _"I 1 . l_:d -. �; I: ,I_ -rtv owners and residents are interested in both foundation -attached and chassis-
,ounted tic 1%, -If_ _.;e_ ,_ I.rr' =ioal or accessory dwelling units. In some cities and counties, there is also
JIc"Wlne1 I I -II-- II I �.n I, h �r11- communities, where multiple foundation -attached or chassis -mounted
' 1, 'r _u aI I d .jn fee-sll F'lple subdivided lots, a condominium lot, or lease lots.
Reg3igal . -I ",or,•1,, cif tirrV .'ht, r , �,vr,i,il i-n-r•rltial irl_hv^i(', _nl air 1 r_r•16the�� k:�a:11 "It�r,:.r55oCi
ated "T'll'I': 1 I'. 1' Itt'_ '. _'•I _ ItV •Ir_,JIMt L'• i11 ity
imp r r ;r1. 11 n11 r• ,I 6 -11 ullding core ,, as v., II as local sr.a ..n • ,r• .-II i zon-
Inc�- i-iilnar i. 1 .� .:,r I'r't�. .It'n.� In ;;v.1r'I`. 'lOUseS.
The Case for Tiny -house Living
When considering homes constructed with similar materials and sited in similar locations, the smaller
the home the cheaper and more efficient it is to heat, cool, and prrvide with electricity and water
services. The same rule applies to the cost of the home itself. Chas, _-i-nounted tiny houses are easier
to move than site -built homes, and buyers can typically punch.,_ t =L)_ ,_,t= Ir,_ I II land. This makes
0- : rattractive to people interested in traveling with their hors and , •:I_ I l_ . le, _r a - - wner-
st pportunities for those who can't afford a conventional site -built i 1ui Ire.
Mar
sera- ii,1. .•I
_ I I .
'I, ; ': I 1 it. member`.
11 , - , n ;'l. P. ill 1' •11 • .` ..;. --, • ^' I,- III- . ...
rary •I j
_i 1 '' r ,:,,;,,:al monitori',--I
i-ii , F.-' 1 th, :,r, I, IL I(. and
I
1 �,• ,,
-. -r ..r= 1 f rr i in ex ID; -,ri;-
i - ,-,r._.I-Ir .-It•-r r 1. Ip,; -IC, r1 Ir1i-i-Is an
r r
--, -tI r
nI-h-It-"s or Infor-i,1 e nca m p r
-I � r, r,; -or indlvid.i:, s expe ter- II- i I- n r-- •
F r - l,'=•
C r t::`ili
_ i- in ='ortland, . r=-ion, has 1=
ided transitional housing In tf,e torn„ of a tiny
lI
_;I;
C, _"'-'1 .Jiq li'C,J1liayc,or�)•
Notwithstanding the potential benefits above, tiny houses do not enjoy universal support In some com-
munities, tiny -house residents have earned a reputation as scofflaws by"flying under the radar"of local
building and zoning code enforcement. In other communities, there is a general concern aboutwelcom-
ing tiny houses without carefully assessing their likely impacts on public health, safety, and welfare.
C.
kr
I
a
V
Pord and, Oregon.
American Planning Association
A Publication of the American Plarx ou"iation I PAS QuickNotes No. 68
Mukrrry Great Cornmurwtes Happen
Remove Unintentional Barriers
For cities and counties interested in supporting tiny -house living, it is important to take a close look
at the effects of current building, subdivision, and zoning requirements on opportunities to site and
occupy tiny houses.The most common regulatory barriers are state or local building code provisions
that stipulate the minimum amount of habitable space per person for different types of residences, local
zoning provisions that stipulate minimum unit sizes, and local zoning provisions establishing minimum
lot area per unit and off-street parking requirements. Beyond this, many cities and counties classify
chassis -mounted tiny houses as recreational vehicles and not dwelling units at all.
In some localities, minimum unit size or habitable space requirements and general prohibitions on
camping outside of designated campgrounds or recreational vehicle parks effectively prohibit all tiny
houses. In others, development standards can make tiny housing cost prohibitive.
Each of these potential barriers to tiny -house living may be wholly consistent with local policy objec-
tives. If this not the case, consider opportunities to revise local building, subdivision, or zoning codes to
remove unintentional barriers to siting and occupying tiny houses.This may be as simple as eliminating
off-street parking requirements for accessory dwelling units or minimum unit size standards that exceed
minimum habitable space requirements in the latest version of the International Building Code.
Identify Appropriate Locations
Not all types of tiny houses are appropriate for all community contexts. Some cities and counties may
be content to see tiny houses on permanent foundations comingled with conventional site -built hous-
ing. Others may prefer to limit tiny houses to tiny -home communities or recreational vehicle parks.
In contexts where it is important to differentiate between tiny houses and other types of dwelling units (or
recreational vehicles), cities and counties should consider defining tiny -house living as one or more distinct
types of land uses and adding these land uses to tables or lists of permitted uses by zoning district.
Mitigate Potential Impacts
In some contexts, zoning district development standards may either be inappropriate for tiny house de-
velopment or insufficient to ensure neighborhood compatibility. In these cases, cities and counties should
consider adopting use -specific standards to minimize the potential for incompatible development.
For example, Fresno, California, permits chassis -mounted tiny houses as a type of accessory dwell-
ing unit, subject to use -specific standards addressing design, minimum lot size, units per lot, unit size,
lot coverage, setbacks, entrances, space between buildings, unit height, openings, access, parking,
mechanical equipment, utility meters/addressing, home occupations, airport compatibility, and owner
occupancy (§15-2754). Meanwhile, Bemidji, Minnesota, permits"tiny house subdivisions"as planned
unit developments, subject to standards addressing location, density, ownership structure, structural
independence, lot size, setbacks, open space, design review, and utilities (§1101.F).
Conclusions
The aging of the U.S. population, the continued growth in the percentage of single -person households,
and the demand for a wider range of housing choices in communities across the country is fueling
interest in new forms of residential development, including tiny houses. While many cities and counties
can accommodate very small, site -built homes under their existing building, subdivision, and zoning
codes, many others have development regulations that make factory -built or chassis -mounted tiny
houses impractical or impossible to site and occupy. Once a city or county has identified a desire to
make space for tiny houses, it's important to remove unintentional regulatory barriers, identify suitable
locations, and consider adopting use -specific standards for tiny -house living.
PAS QuickNotes (ISSN 2169-1940) is a publication of the American Planning Association's Planning Advisory Service (PAS). 02017 by the
American Planning Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing.
VIsitPAS online at planning.org/pas to find out how PAS can work foryou. American Planning Association staff. .James M. Drinan, jo, Executive
Director, David Rouse, IAICP Managing Director of Research and Advisory Services; David Morley, AU, and Anna Read, Mp QuickNotes Editors,
Julie Von Bergen, Senior Editor, Susan Deegan, Senior Graphic Designer
FURTHER READING
1. Published by the American
Planning Association
Elliott, Donald L., and Peter Sullivan. 2015. "Ti ny
Houses and the Not -So -Tiny Questions They
Raise"Zoning Practice, November. Available at
plannina.ora/zoningpractice.
Wyatt, Anne. 2016."Tiny Houses: Niche or
Noteworthy?" Planning, February. Available at
planning.org/planning/2016/feb/tinyhouses.
htm.
2.Other Resources
Vail, Katherine. 2016."Saving the American
Dream:The Legalization oftheTiny House
Movement" University ofLouisville Law Review,
54: 354-379. Available at tinvurl.com/nyxfgbj.
Watson, Jaynes 2017."Do Tiny Houses Fit in
Your Community?" Western Planner, February.
Available attinyurl.com/m8hd2 .
A Publication of the American Plarxl2 iation I PAS QuickNotes No.68
cwwral���rr.
Seward Planning and Zoning Commission
January 6, 2021
Dear Chair €cklund and P&Z Commissioners,
The Seward Historic Preservation Commission would like to formally thank you, the Planning and Zoning Commission,
for your willingness to work together with our commission for the betterrnent ❑f our mutual community. We are
delighted for the opportunity to align ourselves with you in related matters such as the zoning of historical properties.
We acknowledge and appreciate that your commission has valuable knowledge and expertise that is beneficial to the
City of Seward and W Our commission's preservation efforts.
As citizens, two of our commissioners Cheryl Seese and Tanguy Libbrecht, attended your meeting Octuber 6, 2020. 1
understand that there were many public comments that were passed on via the survey and we were grateful for the
opportunity to witness the transparency and public involvement that was afforded by P & Z providing this survey and
public forum.
We are aware that at that meeting your commission voted by majority to approve Resolution 2020-12, sending your
recommendation on to Council for its 1/1.1/21 meeting. Whatever the ultimate outcome, our commission is in support
of the ordinance below to rezone the Jesse Lee Heights Lots 15A and 15B from Multi-Farnily (R3) to Park.
Ordinance 2020-015, Amending the Land Use Plan and Rezoning Lots 15A AND 15B Of Jesse Lee Heights Subdivision
Addition No 4, With the Physical Address Of 101 & 105 Berson Drive, Frorn Multi -Family Residential (R3) To Park (P).
In fact, we are so much in support of your resolution that we drafted one of our own that we would like to include in the
Jan 2021 Council meeting;
HP Resolution 2021-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, IN SUPPORT OF THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF LOTS 15A AND 158, JESSE LEE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, ADDITION 4, WITH
THE PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF 101 AND 105 BENSON DRIVE FROM MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R3) TO PARK (P).
We make this resolution as a show of cooperation and goodwill between our commissions and as affirmation of our
belief in preserving the lots 15A and 1513 for future community use, as a park and memorial to the Jessie Lee Hoare, as
has been proposed.
Thank you again for allowing us to stand with you for the mutual uetterment and preservation of our community'$
history.
Most Respectfully,
Chair Seese
cc. Seward City Council
Substantial
Improvements in
Floodplains
Mitch Paine, CFM — FEMA Region 10
When the NFIP requirements were
created, a decision was made to
create the substantial improvement
rule, where buildings must be
elevated and otherwise brought into
compliance when proposed
improvements are valued at 5011/6 or
more of the pre -improved building's
market value. This substantial
improvement rule is a way to see that
major investments in property in the
floodplain are made safer through
compliance with local floodplain
management regulations. The 50%
threshold was a compromise between
requiring, for example, a house to be
elevated to current standards for any
improvements made to a building or
not requiring elevation for even an
entire house remodel. The most
helpful resource on this topic is the
FEMA Substantial Iinprm ement/
Substantial Damage Desk Reference
(FEMA P-758. Floodplain
administrators often face the
following challenges in applying
substantial improvement
requirements.
How do we determine pre -improved
value?
Establishing the value of the building
before the improvements are made is
the first step in the substantial
improvement review process. Your
community floodplain regulations'
definitions section will reference
"market value:" and a professional
appraisal is the best way to determine
the pre -improved market value.
There are two other main methods:
assessed value and the building's
actual cash value including
depreciation. The key requirement
for using any method is to identify
the value of only the building, not
including land or any other
improvements on the property.
What are included in Casts of
improvements?
When property owners are seeking to
do improvements in the floodplain.
they must supply a detailed list of
project costs, including the market
value of all donated materials or
labor. Floodplain administrators
often then have to identify which
costs of the project are part of the
substantial improvement rules. A
detailed list is found in the Desk
Reference, but generally includes all
work done to the house and must
include all materials and labor.
Generally, the project costs that can
be excluded are permit fees, plug-in
appliances, and outside components
like swimming pools, sidewalks, or
fences. There are templates for use in
the Desk Reference to request
specific project costs that apply to
substantial improvement rules.
Applying the 50% Rule
By accurately obtaining the
building's market value and the
correct costs of the improvements.
you'll be able to calculate the
percentage. The work is SIISD if the
ratio of the cost of work to the market
value equals or exceeds 50 percent.
Continuer) nest page
Cost of Improvement or Cost to Repair to Pre -Damage Condition
Marketvalue of Building
34/39
Substantial Improvement, cont'd
If it falls below 50%, then the
property owner does not need to
elevate or otherwise bring their
building into compliance. If the
improvement costs are 50% or
greater, then the project must include
compliance measures like elevating a
home, including the building
utilities, or dry floodproofing if the
building is nonresidential. Be sure
that permits clearly indicate the
percentage and all documentation
supporting the conclusion is included
in the permit file.
A key step to build into your
community's process is inspecting
the improvement project as
construction is underway to ensure
the property owner doesn't complete
work outside of the scope of the
original permit. If any changes have
been made, issue a stop -work order
and ask the property owner to submit
updated project costs.
Importance of Substantial
Improvement
While requiring a property owner to
elevate their home when doing a
remodel may seem burdensome,
applying substantial improvement
rules results in more buildings safer
from flooding. The cost of elevating
may be offset by flood insurance
savings and reduced future risk from
flooding. Communities can adopt
higher standards by lowering the
50% threshold to, say, 30%, to
ensure more buildings are elevated
when major remodels are done or by
requiring cumulative tracking of
improvements made over a course of
5 or 10 years to catch more projects
done to a building.
Additionally, FEMA is trying hard to
help communities understand these
rules and apply them correctly.
Improved buildings are a big focus of
any Community Assistance Visit, the
FEMA or state audit of local
floodplain management programs.
Administering these requirements
can be complicated and confusing, so
please reach out to your State NFIP
Coordinator or FEMA Region 10
staff for any technical assistance.
FEMA P-758 is an excellent
resource which foodplain
administrators should have handy.
Thinking Beyond Flood
Maps
Using FEMA's Coastal Data to
Reduce Risk and Build Resilience
This year, several FEMA Regions
collaborated with Resiliency Action
Partners to display accessible online
information to assist communities
experiencing coastal flooding. The
purpose of this online stor�map is to
highlight the resiliency actions taken
by these communities, following the
utilization of flood risk data.
Our coasts are home to vibrant
communities, vital resources,
recreational destinations, and robust
economies. About 40 percent of the
United States' population lives in a
coastal county. The National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) estimates
that at least 10 million Americans
moved to a coastal area in the last
decade. What makes these areas so
distinctive also puts them at risk.
Flooding is the nation's costliest
natural disaster. In the United States,
7 of the 10 most expensive disasters
were caused by coastal storms. As
the coastal population grows, more
people and properties are at risk from
coastal storms and flooding.
Coastal environments are dynamic.
They are constantly reshaped by the
forces of nature. Land use changes
and rising average temperatures and
sea levels may increase flood risk.
Many communities see flooding
from high tides more often now. This
can lead to road closures,
overwhelmed stormwater systems,
and disrupted business districts. By
2050, high tide flooding is likely to
occur between 25 and 75 days per
year, depending on location. It is
vitally important for coastal
communities to make informed
decisions about planning, land use,
and building codes. Doing so today
will reduce their risk and increase
their resiliency in the future.
In addition to information about
coastal flood risk around the country,
this resource provides suggestions
for increasing resiliency through
adopting building codes and higher
standards, encouraging communities
to consider land use, zoning, and
siting for new critical facilities, and
how to elevate buildings in high -risk
areas or relocate them to areas with a
lower risk. This coastal data
storymap can help communities to
consider resilience in new
infrastructure, residential, and
commercial design.
For more information on the
development of virtual storymap
resources, contact Kate Skaggs:
kate. skaggskmbakerind. com
Ask the Help Desk
The Region 10 Service Center is
here to help local community
officials and stakeholders with
technical, training, mitigation, and
mapping questions.
Email RegionXHelpDesk@starr-
team.com.
35/39
Next Steps in WA
State's Plan
Integration
A Project update
In the fall of 2019, the Washington
Department of Commerce and
FEMA Region 10 partnered to
provide local land use planners in
Washington State the opportunity to
help structure how natural hazard
mitigation data and risk reduction
strategies are integrated into
Comprehensive Planning. The
widespread need for more thorough
guidance and examples for this
integration became clear over a
series of workshops held in October
and November.
Through collaborative discussions,
FEMA and the Department of
Commerce identified two projects to
support local planners in the near -
term; a Resource Handbook and a
Project Advisory Connnittee who
will work to develop more in-depth
guidance on plan integration.
The Resource Handbook is the result
of a resource audit of current
practices and guidance, from a wide
range of sources, that support the
integration of natural hazard
information into Comprehensive
Plans. It is intended to provide a
summary of existing policy/planning
guides developed by federal, state.
Online Training
(All times Pacific)
CRS: Preparing an Annual
Recertification
January 19, 10 am
Online - 1 GEC
CRS: Substantial Damage
Properties Management Plans
.January 20, 10 am
Online - 1 CEC
and non -profits. It also highlights
specific sections that may be
applicable in helping communities
better incorporate hazard data into
Comprehensive Plans.
The Resource Handbook was shared
with those who participated in the
first series of 2019 workshops, and is
available for download at:
hops : //depto fconunerce. box. c om/ sh
ared'static 4ko34uz5dkzmpthjrf0w
u1hk-0z5ohw.pdf.
There will also be an Advisory
Committee that will be convened in
early 2021 to support the
development of additional tools and
products to help better integrate
natural hazard data into
Comprehensive Plans. The
Department of Connnerce will lead
the committee, with FEMA
supporting the efforts.
If you would litre to be kept apprised
of the Advisory Committee, please
email Steve Roberg:
steve.roberee( connnercemv.gov
STARR: NFIP Basics
January 21, 10 am
Online - 1 CFC
CRS: The 2021 Addendum to
the CRS Manual
February 16, 10 am
Online - 1 GEC
CRS: Changes to Activity 310
Elevation Certificates
February 17, 10 am
Online - 1 GEC
NORFI'IIIA NEWS
CRS users Group Meeting - WA
Quarterly meetings are continuing
virtually. the next meeting is
Thursday January 21, 1pm-3pm
{Pacific}, The Skype connection is
available day -of at: htMs://meet
na.atldnsglobal.com/becca.cro."229
NRMH-r -
HEC-RA5 Training Opportunities
Two HEC-RAS courses hosted by
NORFMA will be available virtually
this spring, one focused on modeling
basics, and another focused on 2D
unsteady flow applications, both led
by WEST Consultants. These
intensive, hands-on workshops will
prepare engineers and water resource
professionals to use the HEC-RAS
computer program in real world
situations. Dates are as follows. -
Basic Steady Flow HEC-RAS Course
March 1 - 5, 2021 (AM sessions)
2D HEC-RAS Course
April 5 - 9, 2021 (AM sessions)
Seats are limited to 15 participants,
so please register early if you are
interested. Full details, times. and
registration costs are available on
NORFMA's Event Calendar.
www.norfma.or;'.
STARR
STARR: Tools for Determining BFE
February 18, 10 am
Online - 1 CEC
To register for online courses, visit
STARR's training site:
i_mo/starronlinetraininP_ or email
RXT ra in i n p-@sta r r-team _ co m _
36/39
Vf �NNN
si � 4�wry
♦C+
0
(A
N
u
VM
d
u
PsN
Ac
c
c
c
-4
m
Ln 2L�++
'+
In OLM
-4
W.
'~ V) N
'� A N
�i �5
'� Vl N
�
'� V) N
D C
c
p
q
M
M0 2
M yp
M
2
N N
lR
N
rl
a"F
~
YV
H
LA
LL rry�l
N F 4Y-1�N
O
�
•a E
Ga] L
a ..90�,f
O 'u
rti C
PsNR
F"
rC 7
07 �
�
S
00
L,
N
RS
E
Ln
E
v
ri
41
N cz
N G] E.
d
E.
i
d V
8a
8a�
m
.-I
ri
N
rr1
^pm
E LA
Q
E o c
N U
c7i
w
p� 0 7 7
S d p 0
O
m a-
f� U �4 U E
6;
O O
a
r,
ry
c+
.i
ry
ry
u
u
E _
E
c C
In
m E
V-0
E
co
c
W9
M
m
!�
Hgo
N
fy
9 qaj - TE ue f ET - L qa j OZ - hi qaf CZ T Z qa j 9 ie W - SZ qo j
N M
W N Q1�NM
�
n:
N
^tiN mN
pp
N
M
a V
a L7
el. C7
a t7
f/1 ptirlN
E C
E c
E C,
E e
Ln LM
y1 �Qyi
Ul 0 M
� {0( LM
W.
O!
'~ GA N
� 47 V
"-4 V1 N
~ Ql �+
'� Vl N.
� QJ
'� L, N
p C
0
D C
O
M
� U
M 2M
0 � l7
Lo
� � L7
M 2
Ln � l7
C7
p
C7
4l1Nrn�
rl N
Let
"� N
Q1
—4
~
N
M
rrWWl
•i IE �WNN
N
V
c ^�
H-.-t�"V2i
T�,
p[E� Gam] m
u
0
C
L
CL
0
E
Ln
E
$3�
v
N co
E
CZ E
8�
CL
8C.L
t�1
'� Ci
1'►
CV
°� et
.r
C1
T
E r^
a. E
0
ch
r4n 7
pa U
0
E:
L
7
CL
$"
� v a
C3�
r+
1da
� M
C7
Nki
m
u
u 7
E _
E
c C
o E
0
0 o
o
E m
E
o
e�
m
n Ih
N
r. 09
co
(14
N
C
y
mr
ri
OD
9JeW -8Zgaj FT •LKIN oz - di Jeffµ LZ -EZJeW EJdV-8ZJeW
0)
�(Y)
00
m
uR Mao .�+r�ry
nNNN
�
pp
bwmiNN
V
N
�
m
c nsona-
Na�MM
:E=u
J
= d
J
E c
o LA
E c
E
A5�
E c
Lm
E c
0 Lny�
s,
Ln
Ln _a 5�5��
Ln
�25
�n o
�
Ln
4
V) ry
425
� ry
��4
- . V) ry
-4
E c
E,
E
E
Vq7 mc^I n.aNar
✓D
�
�c
L
a�E. }
2
D m
--
N
? htiNN
= G .p
E a E
d L
�2
�5 U
a
8
qq
LA
N
rN
N
O
.yy
A
E �
!7
'�
aco
s
a�
K cc
a�
[V
ry
r2i
m
d"u
E o
�m §
O U
a
p QQ CJ
ti V
m a—
vi
—
E
Y 7
i
O 0
10
ri
N
N
LUJ
V in
a'V
a
_
a0�
g E U
$ �
ry
Ln
rl
M
10
N
J
^ice
A
V1
•�
Od
�
19t
e-f
r1
Q
E Jdy - 8Z Jeyy pI - k Jdy LI - II Jdy bZ - 81 Jdy I Re{N - SZ JdV
CD
�0)
co