Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11022021 Planning & Zoning Meeting PacketPlanning and Zoning Commission Regular Board Meeting November 2, 2021 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers, 410 Adams Street The City of Seward, Alaska SEWARD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA November 2, 2021 Vacant Chair Term February, 2023 Tom Swann Vice Chair Term February, 2022 Gary Seese Commissioner Term February, 2022 Craig Ambrosiam Commissioner Term February, 2022 Nathaniel Charbonneau Commissioner Term February, 2024 Vanessa Verhey Commissioner Term February, 2023 Clare Sullivan Commissioner Term February, 2024 Janette Bower City Manager Courtney Bringhurst Acting Community Development Director Brenda Ballou City Clerk 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL � I Council Chambers 4. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING [Those who have signed in will be given the first opportunity to speak. Time is limited to 3 minutes per speaker and 36 minutes total speaking time for this agenda item.] 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA [Approval of Consent Agenda passes all routine items indicated by asterisk (*). Consent Agenda items are not considered separately unless a commissioner so requests. In the event of such a request, the item is returned to the Regular Agenda] 6. SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS City of Seward, Alaska November 2, 2021 A. Proclamations and Awards - None B. City Administration Report C. Other Reports and Announcements D. Presentations [Presentations are limited to ten minutes each, excluding Q&A, and are limited to two per meeting unless increased by the commission.] - None Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda `a 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS [Public hearing comments are limited to five (5) minutes per person. After all speakers have spoken, a person may speak for a second time for no more than one (1) minute.] A. Resolutions Requiring Public Hearing 1. Resolution 2021-026, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Granting A Conditional Use Permit To ACOM Consulting Inc. To Construct A Wireless Communications Facility On The Roof Of The Residence Hall On Block 29, Original Townsite Of Seward, Block 29 Replat, Located At 516 Third Avenue; Within An Institutional (INS) Zoning District.......................................................................Page 5 2. Resolution 2021-027, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Granting A Conditional Use Permit To OBI Seafoods To Construct An Employee Campground With Modular Housing On Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision, Located At 1607 Northwestern Circle; Within An Industrial (I) Zoning District............... ...............................................................................................................................Page 131 3. Resolution 2021-028, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Recommending Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval Of The Preliminary Replat Of Lot 4A-1 And Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, Creating Four Lots; Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, And Lot 4A-4; Vacating The West 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, And East 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat.............................................................Page 149 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — None 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Other New Business Items * 1. Approve the October 19, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes ........................Page 164 2. Nominate and elect a Chair...............................................................................Page 172 3. Nominate and elect a Vice Chair.......................................................................Page 172 4. Review City Council directive to evaluate allowing Light Manufacturing in the Central BusinessDistrict..............................................................................................Page 173 5. Discuss and set the topic for the November 16, 2021 work session. 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS [No Action Required] A. Reminder: December 7, 2021 meeting and December 21, 2021 work session have been cancelled. B. Reminder: January 4, 2022 meeting has been rescheduled to January 11, 2022. C. PAS Quick Notes- Climate Resilient Pollinator Gardens...............................Page 180 It. CITIZEN COMMENTS [There is no sign in for this commentperiod. Time is limited to five (5) minutes per speaker.] City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda November 2, 2021 3 12. BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION COMMENTS & RESPONSE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda November 2, 2021 Sponsored by: Applicant CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2021-026 A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Seward, Alaska, Granting a Conditional Use Permit to ACOM Consulting Inc. to Construct a Wireless Communications Facility on the Roof of the Residence Hall on Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat, Located at 516 Third Avenue; Within an Institutional (Ins) Zoning District WHEREAS, ACOM Consulting Inc. has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission to construct a wireless communications facility on the roof of the residence hall at 516 Third Avenue, Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat; and WHEREAS, the property is in an Institutional (Ins) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the existing rooftop wireless facility on this property is operated by a different carrier; and WHEREAS, residents, students, businesses, and first responders rely heavily on networks to function for daily communications; and WHEREAS, the benefit from connectivity for wireless services to the surrounding area is essential for not only communications, but for purposes of work and business as well; and WHEREAS, the applicant has complied with all of the public hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission that: Section 1. According to SCC 15.10.320.D., the Commission shall establish a finding that the use satisfies the following conditions prior to granting a conditional use permit: A. The use is consistent with the purpose of this chapter (the Seward Zoning Code) and the purposes of the zoning district. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with an existing use on the facility for the proposed wireless communications facility in an Institutional Zone. The applicant's compliance with the requirements of the Seward Zoning Code and District demonstrate that the proposed facility will be safe, functional, energy efficient and compatible with Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-026 Page 2 of 4 the proposed use. The attached site plan and narrative contained herein provides response and detail indicating the requirements of the following are met: City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.320 Conditional Use Permit City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.250 Commercial Communication Towers City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.220 Development Requirements B. The value ofadjoining property will not be significantly impaired. Finding: This condition has been met. The ability to utilize reliable wireless communications provides productivity, efficiency and safety for all those who live, work, or are visiting a specific area, and therefore provide additional value to the properties in which are provided this proposed service. C. The proposed use is in harmony with the Seward Comprehensive Plan. Finding: This condition has been met. The proposal is in harmony with the Seward 2030 Comprehensive Plan (2017) and Strategic Plan (1999) Seward Comprehensive Plan (approved by Council, May 30, 2017) Vol I Ch 2.2.11 - Economic Base • "Provide modern communications infrastructure" Vol I Ch 3.1 - Economic Development • 3.1.1.2 "Support development of modern communications infrastructure" Strategic Plan (1999) Endeavor to provide modern communication infrastructure (Page 5). Promote the development of local communication networks (Page 13). D. Public Services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. Finding: This condition has been met. Construction plans, analysis, and narratives included in the application show that public services and facilities are adequate to support a wireless communications facility at the proposed location. E. The proposed use will not be harmful to the public safety, health or welfare. Finding: This condition has been met. The proposed facility will comply fully with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety standards. The FCC developed those standards in consultation with numerous other agencies, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standards were developed by expert scientists and engineers after Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-026 Page 3 of 4 extensive reviews of the scientific literature related to RF biological effects over decades of wireless usage. F. Any and all specific conditions deemed necessary by the commission to fulfill the above -mentioned conditions shall be met by the applicant. These may include but are not limited to measures relative to access, screening, site development, building design, operation of the use, and other similar aspects related to the proposed use. Based on the above findings and conclusions, approval of the CUP shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with City staff through the building permit process to address and accomplish any required upgrades or modifications. 2. The applicant shall work with the City Electric Department for any possible upgrades to electric utilities. 3. Per Seward City Code § 15.10.325(f). an approved CUP shall lapse six months from the date of approval if the use for which the permit was issued has not been implemented or a building permit obtained. The Commission may grant a six-month extension upon finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. 4. Modification of final approval of a conditional use permit may, upon application by the permitee, be modified by the Planning and Zoning Commission: a. When changed conditions cause the conditional use to no longer conform to the standards for its approval. b. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards for its approval. c. The modification plan shall be subject to a public hearing and a filing fee set by City Council Resolution. Section 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the proposed use, subject to the above conditions satisfies the criteria for granting a conditional use permit provided the conditions listed on Section 1, Subsections A through F are met by the applicant, and authorizes the administration to issue a conditional use permit to ACOM Consulting Inc. to construct a wireless communications facility on the roof of the residence hall at 516 Third Avenue, Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat Section 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that adherence to the conditions of this permit is paramount in maintaining the intent of Seward City Code Section 15.10.320: Conditional Use Permits, and authorizes the administration to issue a conditional use permit. Additionally, the administration shall periodically confirm the use conforms to the standards of its approval. Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-026 Page 4 of 4 Section 4. This resolution shall take effect 10 days following its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission this 2nd day of November 2021. THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Tom Swann, Vice Chair AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) P&Z Agenda Statement Meeting Date: November 2, 2021 Through: From: Courtney L. Bringhurst, Planner Agenda Item: Resolution 2021-026 of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Seward, Alaska, Granting a Conditional Use Permit to ACOM Consulting Inc. to Construct a Wireless Communications Facility on the Roof of the Residence Hall on Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat, Located at 516 Third Avenue; Within an Institutional (Ins) Zoning District BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: ACOM Consulting Inc. has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission to construct a wireless communications facility on the roof of the residence hall at 516 Third Avenue, Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat. The site proposed for this wireless communications facility is designed to improve the voice and data capacity for Verizon's customers in Seward, Alaska. It will also maximize coverage while minimizing visual impacts by locating next to an existing communications facility while using the minimum height needed to meet coverage objectives. The facility will be unmanned, and accessible by authorized personnel only, and will not produce any hazardous waste. The proposed facility will serve the surrounding community by providing additional cellular bandwidth in an area that is currently underserved. With the ever-increasing number of data - intensive mobile devices that are now being used for streaming, online conferences and education, cloud computing, and telemedicine, the telecommunications industry is facing unprecedented demand for increased telecommunications bandwidth capacity. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Development Requirements: The proposed structure for the business meets the Zoning Code Development Requirements Table 15.10.222, as well as the more specific requirements for Commercial Communications Towers in § 15.10.250. Seepage 39, Land Use Narrative, and page 49, Construction Drawings and Site Plans, for additional details. Floodplain status: According to the Kenai Peninsula Floodplain Map, the area is not located within a flood zone. Utilities: The applicant is proposing an unmanned facility on an existing structure with adequate structural capacity for the use. The proposed use will also utilize existing infrastructure for electricity and fiber for ongoing use and operations of the facility. No other public services or facilities are needed. Parking: No parking is needed or required for the use of this wireless communications facility. CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No N/A Comprehensive Plan (2030, approved by Council 2017): Vol I Ch 2.2.11 - Economic Base • "Provide modern communications infrastructure" 1. Vol I Ch 3.1 - Economic Development X • 3.1.1.2 "Support development of modern communications infrastructure" Strategic Plan (1999): Endeavor to provide modern communication infrastructure (Page 5). 2. Promote the development of local communication networks (Page 13). X Staff Comments: Department Comments No Comment N/A Building Department Applicant will need a building permit Fire Department X Public Works Department X Harbor Department X Police Department X Electric Department X Telecommunications X Public Notice: Property owners within three hundred (300) feet of Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat were notified of this proposed conditional use permit action. Public notice signs were posted on the property and all other public hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040 were complied with. At the time of this publication the Community Development Department has received no public inquiries regarding the proposed Conditional Use Permit. If any correspondence is received after publication of this agenda statement, it will be presented as a lay down item at the Commission 10 meeting. Recommended Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with City staff through the building permit process to address and accomplish any required upgrades or modifications. 2. The applicant shall work with the City Electric Department for any possible upgrades to electric utilities prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued. 3. Per Seward City Code § 15.10.325(f). an approved CUP shall lapse six months from the date of approval if the use for which the permit was issued has not been implemented or a building permit obtained. The Commission may grant a six-month extension upon finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. 4. Modification of final approval of a conditional use permit may, upon application by the permitee, be modified by the Planning and Zoning Commission: a. When changed conditions cause the conditional use to no longer conform to the standards for its approval. b. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards for its approval. c. The modification plan shall be subject to a public hearing and a filing fee set by City Council Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of Resolution 2021-026, granting a conditional use permit to ACOM Consulting Inc. to construct a wireless communications facility on the roof of the residence hall at 516 Third Avenue, Block 29, Original Townsite of Seward, Block 29 Replat, in an Institutional Zoning District (Ins). is CITY OF SE" WARD Community Development P. O. Box 167 907.224.4049 907.224.4038 fax 410 Adams Street Seward, Alaska 99664 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION This completed application is to be submitted to the City Clerk no later than three (3) weeks in advance of the next regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of each month. The application must be accompanied by the $300 filing fee. Approved permits will require an additional document recording fee, as set by the State of Alaska. In addition, please provide an as -built survey if the property has been developed or a scaled site plan with elevations if the property is undeveloped. Applicant: ACOM Consulting Inc - Christine Bradford (Verizon Wireless Agent) Address: 5200 SW Meadows Rd Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Telephone Number: 503-509-9034 Email: christine.bradford@acomconsultinginc.com Property Owner (if other than applicant): Alaska State D N R - Avtec Address: 550 W 7th Avenue Suite 650 Anchorage AK 99501 Telephone Number: 907-224-6151 Property Description Address: 516 Third Avenue Seward AK 99664 Email: Lot Size: 3.03 Acres T 01 W R 10 SEC 01 S Seward Meridian SW 0000067 ORIGINAL TOWNSITE OF SEWARD BLO CK 29 REPLAT BLK 29 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Kenai Peninsula Borough Tax Parcel ID Number: Development Information 14811003 There are multiple building structures on the property, including an What structures are on the property? existing rooftop wireless facility The buildings are currently used as a campus for workforce development, providing education and training as well as residence halls. The rooftop of one of the residence How is the property being used? halls is currently being used for wireless communications. What is the proposed use of the property? What is the development timeline? Verizon Wireless proposes to utilize the roof of the residence hall at 516 3rd Ave to place and operate a wireless communications facility Verizon proposes to install equipment within 3 months of an approved land use and building permit issuance im Please note that prior to the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission granting a Conditional Use Permit, it shall be established that the proposed use satisfies the following conditions of Seward City Code 15.10.320 (See the attached pages for specific City Code requirements) A) The proposed use is consistent with the requirements of the Seward Zoning Code and the designated zoning district. Please describe the use. The proposed use is consistent with an existing use on the facility for the proposed wireless communications facility in an Institutional Zone.The applicant's compliance with the requirements of the Seward Zoning Code and District demonstrate that the proposed facility will be safe, functional, energy efficient and compatible with the proposed use. The attached site plan and narrative contained herein provides response and detail indicating the requirements of the following are met: City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.320 Conditional Use Permit City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.250 Commercial Communication Towers City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.220 Development Requirements B) Describe any impacts to the adjoining properties and how property values may be affected. Residents, students, businesses and first responders rely heavily on networks to function for daily communications. The benefit from connectivity for wireless services to the surrounding area is essential for not only communications, but for purposes of work and business as well. The ability to utilize reliable wireless communications provides productivity, efficiency and safety for all those who, live, work or are visiting a specific area and therefore provide additional value to the properties in which are provided this proposed service. C) How is the proposed use consistent with the Seward Comprehensive Plan? Explain. You can view the plan at: http://www.cityofseward.us/ The proposed use is in line with the needs to upgrade and expand connections with modern telecommunication networks to further support businesses and government operations as outlined in the 13.4.1 Communications section of the Comprehensive Plan. Further narrative is provided herein as part of consistency and support of other areas throughout the Plan as well including, but not limited to public safety, and economics of the surrounding area. D) Describe / list the public services and facilities that will serve the proposed use. (i.e., roads, utilities.) The proposed use will provide wireless communications and connectivity to all the surrounding areas of the City of Seward that is comprised of a myriad of environments ranging from restaurants, parks, lodging facilities, retail shops, medical facilities, government buildings, schools, businesses and organizations. The proposed use will provide necessary coverage needed for reliable communications for purposes of work, school, socializing, tourism and public safety. E) The proposed project or use must not be harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. Describe any mitigation measures that may be needed to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed facility will comply fully with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety standards. The FCC developed those standards in consultation with numerous other agencies, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standards were developed by expert scientists and engineers after extensive reviews of the scientific literature related to RF biological effects over decades of wireless usage. The FCC explains that its standards "incorporate prudent margins of safety." It explains further that "radio frequency emissions from antennas used for cellular and PCS transmissions result in exposure levels on the ground that are typically thousands of times below. safety limits." The FCC provides information about the safety of RF emissions from cellular base stations on its website at: http:// www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/rffags.html. Wireless Communication facilities have been designated by Homeland Security as critical infrastructure of the United States. During events such as natural disasters or acts of terrorism, cell reception has been critical for first responders and emergency personnel to have effective communications. 13 F) Include building elevation plans and a site plan, drawn to scale. The site plan should include: 1) Property dimensions 2) Location and dimensions of existing and planned buildings 3) Parking configuration 4) Driveways and access 5) Natural features 6) Other pertinent information I hereby certify that the above statements and other information submitted are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I have the following legal interest in the property: ( ) Owner of record ( )Lessee ( ) Contract purchaser ( ) Authorized to act for a person who has the following legal interest: I understand that this item will be scheduled for action only if all application materials are submitted not less than three weeks in advance of the next regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of every month. Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Enclosed: $300 Payment (nonrefundable) ( ) Dimensioned plot plan / drawings ( ) Other: 14 �9<< B F x r O LL A MONROE o C/) L x x X MADISON 0 z x O c� LL w LL U) Wireless Communications Tower Application — Table of Contents AK2 Seward RF Letter Signed.....................................................................page 17 Verizon AK Seward Land Use Narrative .........................................................page 23 Construction Drawings and Site Plan..............................................................page 49 FCCLicense..........................................................................................page 74 StructuralAnalysis...................................................................................page 76 NIERReport..........................................................................................page 101 Seward Wireless Facility Removal Agreement Draft...........................................page 122 AK Seward Photosims...............................................................................page 127 IV verizonv 5430 NE 122"d Ave n u e Portland, OR97230 September 22, 2021 This letter will serve to explain Verizon's site selection process for our proposed site named SEWARD to be located at 516 Third Avenue in Seward, Alaska. I have worked on Verizon radiofrequency (RF) design for 20 years and I personally performed the RF analysis for this site. Our objective for this site is to provide new 4G service in the downtown area of Seward. Verizon customers currently roam in the Seward area, they use service provided by another wireless company. The result of the new SEWARD site on the roof of the AVTEC building will allow Verizon to control their customers experience and will result in increased data rates with stronger RF signals and an overall improved customer experience in the downtown area. Site Location, Coverage Objectives & Collocation Feasibility When evaluating an existing or new area for the need for coverage or capacity improvements, Verizon will firsttry to utilize an existing toweror structure for collocation atthedesired antenna height. If an existing tower or structure is not available or not attainable because of space constraints or unreliable structural design, Verizon will propose a new tower. Verizon's real estate group, with the assistance of outside consultants, was able to find an existing structure for colocation of the Verizon wireless equipment. The first site identified that allows for colocation is located at 516 Third Avenue, Seward, Alaska. The rooftop of this facility has an operational wireless facility of another provider with additional space for colocation of equipment for another carrier. The ground elevation is 83 feet at this location and allows for a 49 foot antenna tip height on the rooftop. The second location explored was a self-supporting tower owned by TeIAlaska, located at 333 4th Ave. Seward, AK which is located .23 miles away from the primary location identified. The tower stands at 45 feet tall, with a ground elevation of 77 feet, and has several existing carriers equipment already collocated on the facility. This location was initially determined to be a potential candidate for colocation of equipment at this facility with a 30 foot antenna tip height, but subsequent propagation analysis found it will not appropriately provide the coverage needed to the area, as discussed in more detail below. In addition, the TeIAlaska structure is over 40 years old and the tower owner has confirmed that this tower would require replacement in order for Verizon to collocate equipment at this facility. UVA We then worked on a new tower in the area after we had troubles with the first 2 existing structures. Due to some rule changes we went back to look at existing structures again. With the ability to collocate equipment on a rooftop with an existing wireless use per the city code, Verizon approached the AVTEC building a second time and was able to establish a feasible location that would provide the needed coverage to the surrounding area. Verizon is building a new network in the Seward area. We are trying to cover the most people that we can with the best coverage with m inimal towers. This site is designed to cover a large portion of the city When determining the height of antennas, the surrounding area, terrain, trees and buildings in the coverage area are all taken into consideration. A lower antenna height will not provide as extensive of a coverage area because clutter present at a lower height interferes with RF signals. The taller antenna height will have a bigger coverage area because the clutter has less of an impact. The roof of the AVTEC building places the antennas above the clutter. Design Criteria To analyze network design, Verizon Wireless uses a proprietary Radio Frequency prediction tool to predict the signal strength and analyze our network design. Figure 1 shows the coverage of our sites that we are currently pursuing in the area, as seen with our prediction tool. The red area on the maps represents a high RF signal strength, generally providing good service in vehicles and buildings. Green represents moderate RF signal strength that generally provides good service in vehicles and fair service inside structures. Blue represents RF signal that generally offer a poor quality of service, with problems penetrating building walls but fair service in vehicles. In Figure 1 below, there is significant blue areas throughout the city, including the downtown area. Areas without color represent anticipated weak RF areas where coveragewould be unreliable overall. Verizon Wireless needs adesign that maxim izes areas indicated by the red and green throughout com m unities to best serve our customers. It is important to note that higher signal strengths promote and provide much greater wireless data speeds, which are much needed as customer use of multiple wireless devices for a variety of tasks, including teleconferencing, telemedicine, remote learning and employment and public safety. To accom plish high data rates, signal strengths noted by red and green on coverage plots, need to be present where most of the customers use these data devices. Evaluation Results Figure 1 shows predicted coverage with the surrounding proposed sites. Figure 2 shows the predicted coverage with our proposed SEWARD site on the AVTEC rooftop with an antenna tip height of 49 feet. An improvement in coverage can be seen when comparing figures 1 and 2, much more red and green and the weaker blue areas push out farther to the west. Figure 3 show a prediction from the TelAlaska location with the antennas at 30 feet. It can be seen that the RF signals are weaker to the north with more area of no color opening up. There is a small section at the south end of town that is stronger but overall the AVTEC building provides better coverageto m ore people and businesses in the Seward area due to the higher ground elevation and taller roof. 18 Summary As Verizon continues to improve coverage and adds capacity in these areas, we will require mores ites to provide the reliable and robust wireless services and quality that our customers expect. We make every effort to utilize existing structures and will continue to prioritize them in the future, when available and technically feasible. The proposed SEWARD site, Figure 2, provides better coverage for more users when compared to Figure 3, the TelAlaska tower. This design places the cell site near more users and will help create a high quality network that will minimize dropped calls and access failures and provides reliable voice and data, as expected by Verizon customers. The proposed SEWARD site is also an essential com m unication facility for public safety as the Verizon com m unication network is providing enhanced 911 services as well as serving many governmental agencies and emergency responders. This design will provide a quality service experience for our customers and others that count on our network. Regards, Jeff ulley Verizon Pacific Northwest Region Network Department —System Design iM Fiaurel —Predicted : a� with other Verizon sites in the Seward area. ti FfSURRECTION (STA-4M1) MML04_4W& 6 0 In -Building In -Car Street Pill Figure 2 — Predicted coverage with the AVrECH building E. F5r-1 R ECTION (STA-OM1) aim 44$1 SEWARD (STA4)Op Seward-UXa*a (STA{'ANO) ep452 SPRING CR IN M In -Building Ire -Car Street PA Figure 3 r m 11. Predicted with the TeWaska tower In wilding bm In -Car ■ str88t W LAND USE APPLICATION NARRATIVE VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 516 Third Avenue Seward, Alaska 99664 Prepared By CCNS€JLTING, INC Date September 24, 2021 Project Name AK SEWARD 23 NARRATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION...............................................3 II. PROJECT OVERVIEW........................................................3 III. PROPOSED PLAN.............................................................4 IV. SITE SELECTION..............................................................4 V. APPLICABLE LAW.............................................................9 VI. CODE COMPLIANCE......................................................11 City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.320 Conditional Use Permit City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.250 Commercial Communication Towers City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.220 Development Requirements VII. CONCLUSION......................................................................26 EXHIBIT LIST A. RF Justification B. Construction Drawings inclusive of a Site Plan C. FCC License D. Structural Analysis E. Wireless Facility Removal Agreement Draft F. Photo simulations G. NIER Report 2 24 Acorn I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Verizon Wireless d/b/a Cellco Partnership ("Verizon") 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 Representative: Acorn Consulting, Inc. Christine Bradford 2098 Allendale Way NE Keizer, OR 97303 Property Owner: Alaska State D N R - AVTEC 550 W 7t" Avenue Suite 650 Anchorage, AK 99501 Proiect Information: Site Address: 516 Third Avenue Seward, AK 99664 Parcel: 14811003 Parcel Area: 3.03 Acres Zone Designation: INS I Institutional, public, quasi -public uses Existing Use: Communication/Public Use Project Area: Rooftop area inclusive of 850 square feet II. PROJECT OVERVIEW Acorn Consulting, Inc. is applying for a conditional use permit for a new unmanned wireless telecommunications facility on behalf of the Applicants, Verizon Wireless and the property owner, Alaska D N R, AVTEC. The site proposed herein is designed to improve the voice and data capacity for Verizon's customers in Seward, Alaska. The applicant proposes to collocate antennas and associated wireless equipment including equipment cabinets, cabling, and an ice bridge on the rooftop of the structure located at 516 Third Avenue, in Seward, Alaska. 3 25 Acorn The location of the proposed facility maximizes coverage while minimizing visual impacts by locating next to an existing communications facility while using the minimum height needed to meet coverage objectives. The proposed antenna height, with an overall antenna tip height of 49 feet, is the minimum height necessary to provide the required coverage relative to nearby complementary wireless facilities. The facility will be unmanned, and accessible by authorized personnel only and will not produce any hazardous waste. A site technician will visit the site 1-2 times a month. The proposed facility will serve the surrounding community by providing additional cellular bandwidth in an area that is currently underserved. With the ever-increasing number of data - intensive mobile devices that are now being using for streaming, online conferences and education, cloud computing, and telemedicine, the telecommunications industry is facing unprecedented demand for increased telecommunications bandwidth capacity. III. PROPOSED PLAN This request is for review of the Land Use Development of a proposed wireless communications facility on a rooftop with an existing wireless use. The subject property consists of approximately 3.03 acres with existing primary access from Third Avenue to the existing structure. The tract is surrounded primarily by residential parcels, with commercial and business zones throughout the outer areas of the proposed service area. There are no existing Verizon Wireless facilities in the surrounding area. This proposed facility would be part of a larger network proposed for development in and around the surrounding areas. All required materials required for the application and conditional use process are submitted and included herein. IV. SITE SELECTION Verizon seeks to address a significant capacity deficiency in its coverage in the city of Seward, Alaska. The proposed site location was chosen to improve the voice and data coverage and capacity for customers in the area, as detailed below. 4 26 t CONSULTING, INC Figure 1 - Area of Concern Verizon constructs wireless communication facilities at carefully selected locations. The need for service in this geographic area was determined by market demand, coverage and capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another. Once the need for additional capacity was established, Verizon's radio frequency ("RF") engineers performed a study to determine the approximate site location and antenna height required to provide the additional wireless capacity. Using a computer modeling program that accounts for the terrain within the service area and other variables, such as proposed antenna height, available radio frequencies and wireless equipment characteristics, the engineers identified a "search ring," wherein a site could be located to meet Verizon's service objectives. Generally, the RF engineers take the following objectives into consideration when identifying a search ri ng: D. Coverage. An antenna site must be located in an area where the radio frequency broadcasts will provide adequate coverage within any significant gap in coverage. The RF engineer must take into consideration the coverage objectives for the site as 5 27 iF Acorn well as the terrain in and around the area to be covered. Since radio frequency broadcasts travel in a straight line and diminish as they travel further away from the antennas, it is generally best to place an antenna site near the center of the desired coverage area. However, in certain cases, the search ring may be located away from the center of the desired coverage area due to the existing coverage, the surrounding terrain, or other features which might affect the radio frequency broadcasts like buildings or sources of electrical interference. 2. Capacity. Capacity refers to the technological limitation of a wireless communication facility to provide communication. Mobile phones and wireless devices transmit to and receive radio frequency signal from antennas at wireless communication facilities. Antennas are capable of transmitting and receiving a finite amount of signal - the capacity. When capacity is reached, busy signals on phones, dropped calls result and data transmission speed is lost. Monitoring of each wireless facility is continuous, and the data collected is analyzed for planning to prevent overloading. Projections based on the data allow Verizon to plan, design, permit, and construct new facilities or modify existing wireless communication facility before reaching or exceeding capacity, which can result in a loss of coverage. 3. Clutter. Verizon's antennas must "clear the clutter" in the area. The radio frequencies used in Verizon's systems are adversely affected by trees, buildings, and other natural and man-made obstacles. Radio frequencies do not penetrate mountains, hills, rocks or metal, and radio frequencies are diminished by trees, brick and wood walls, and other structures. Therefore, antennas must be installed above the "clutter" in order to provide high quality communications services in the desired coverage areas. In addition, if the local code requires us to accommodate additional carriers on the structure, the structure must be even higher in order to allow the other carriers' antennas to clear the clutter as well. 4. Call Handoff. The antenna site must be located in an area where the radio broadcasts from this site will allow seamless call handoff with adjacent sites. "Call handoff' is a feature of a wireless communications system which allows an ongoing telephone conversation to continue uninterrupted as the user travels from the coverage area of one antenna site into the coverage area of an adjacent antenna site. This requires coverage overlap for a sufficient distance and/or period of time to support the mechanism of the handoff. 5. Quality of Service. Users of wireless communications services need to use their devices where they live, work, commute, and play, including when they are indoors. Verizon's coverage objectives include the ability to provide indoor coverage in areas where there are residences, businesses, and indoor recreational facilities. 6 28 iF Acorn 6. Radio Frequencies Used by System. The designs of telecommunications systems will vary greatly based upon the radio frequencies that are used by the carrier. If the carrier uses radio frequencies that are in the 850 MHz to 950 MHz range, the radio signals will travel further and will penetrate buildings better than the radio frequencies in the 1900 MHz band. Thus, Verizon needs more facilities in a given area to support technologies that use the 1900 MHz band. 7. Land Use Classifications. Verizon's ability to construct a cell site on any property is affected by Alaska state law and the Seward Municipal Code. This needs determination for the proposed site was a result of a combination of customer complaints and service and preliminary design analysis. Terrain data within the service area is entered into a modeling program along with a series of variables, such as proposed antenna height, available radio frequencies and wireless equipment characteristics. Using this information, Verizon's RF engineers identified an area of optimum location for and height of a new wireless communication facility antenna to address the significant deficiency in capacity. When this technical analysis was completed, a search area map and a description of other requirements were provided to Verizon's site development specialists. 7 29 t CONSULTING, INC Figure 2: Search Ring Map When designing an existing or new area for coverage or capacity Verizon Wireless prioritizes site designs; 1 It priority sites attempt to utilize an existing tower or structure for colocation at the desired antenna height; 2r,d priority sites are utility poles or high tension power lines for colocation at the desired antenna height; and 3rd and last priority is to propose a new tower or structure and then only provided an existing tower or structure is not available or not attainable because of space constraints or unreliable structural capacity. For this specific search area, the real estate team did several searches in the area. The entire search ring is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Seward. 8 30 Acorn For this project, a significant deficiency in coverage and capacity was determined to exist in the proposed area of Seward. With this information in hand, Verizon ranked potential sites within the search ring. When designing an existing or new area for coverage or capacity, Verizon will first attempt to utilize an existing tower or structure for collocation at the desired antenna height. If an existing tower or structure is not available or not attainable because of space constraints or unreliable structural design, Verizon will propose a new tower. In this instance, our real estate group with the help of outside consultants did several searches and concluded the option to collocate on a rooftop with an existing wireless facility would be feasible, provide coverage and additional capacity for the area in need, with the least amount of visual impact. V. Applicable Law Federal and local laws will apply to this application. Federal Law Federal law, primarily found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("Telecom Act"), acknowledges a local jurisdiction's zoning authority over proposed wireless facilities but limits the exercise of that authority in several important ways. o Local jurisdictions may not materially limit or inhibit. The Telecom Act prohibits a local jurisdiction from taking any action on a wireless siting permit that "prohibit[s] or [has] the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(13)(i)(II). According to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") Order adopted in September 2018,1 a local jurisdiction's action has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services when it "materially limits or inhibits the ability of any competitor or potential competitor to compete in a fair and balanced legal and regulatory environment." 2 Under the FCC Order, an applicant need not prove it has a significant gap in 1 Accelerating Wireless and Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order, WT Docket No. 17-79, WC Docket No. 17-84, FCC 18-133 (rel. Sept. 27, 2018); 83 Fed. Reg. 51867 (Oct. 15, 2018) ("FCC Order"). 2 Id. at ¶ 35. 9 31 Acorn coverage; it may demonstrate the need for a new wireless facility in terms of adding capacity, updating to new technologies, and/or maintaining high quality service.' While an applicant is no longer required to show a significant gap in service coverage, in the Ninth Circuit, a local jurisdiction clearly violates section 332(c)(7)(13)(i)(II) when it prevents a wireless carrier from using the least intrusive means to fill a significant gap in service coverage. T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. City of Anacortes, 572 F.3d 987, 988 (9th Cir. 2009). Significant Gap. Reliable in -building coverage is now a necessity and every community's expectation. Consistent with the abandonment of land line telephones and reliance on only wireless communications, federal courts now recognize that a "significant gap" can exist based on inadequate in -building coverage. See, e.g., T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, 528 F. Supp. 2d 1128, 1168-69 (D.Kan. 2007), affirmed in part, 546 F.3d 1299 (10th Cir. 2008); MetroPCS, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, 2006 WL 1699580, *10-11 (N.D. Cal. 2006). Least Intrusive Means. The least intrusive means standard "requires that the provider'show that the manner in which it proposes to fill the significant gap in service is the least intrusive on the values that the denial sought to serve."' 572 F.3d at 995, quoting MetroPCS, Inc. v. City of San Francisco, 400 F.3d 715, 734 (9th Cir. 2005). These values are reflected by the local code's preferences and siting requirements. o Environmental and health effects prohibited from consideration. Also, under the Telecom Act, a jurisdiction is prohibited from considering the environmental effects of RF emissions (including health effects) of the proposed site if the site will operate in compliance with federal regulations. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). Verizon has included with this application a statement from Pramira, Inc. demonstrating that the proposed facility will operate in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission's RF emissions regulations - a NIER report (Exhibit G) Accordingly, this issue is preempted under federal law and any 3 Id. at ¶¶ 34-42. 10 32 iF Acorn testimony or documents introduced relating to the environmental or health effects of the proposed Facility should be disregarded in this proceeding. o No discrimination amongst providers. Local jurisdiction also may not discriminate amongst providers of functionally equivalent services. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(1). Ajurisdiction must be able to provide plausible reasons for disparate treatment of different providers' applications for similarly situated facilities. o Shot Clock. Finally, the Telecom Act requires local jurisdictions to act upon applications for wireless communications sites within a "reasonable" period of time. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii). The FCC has issued a "Shot Clock" rule to establish a deadline for the issuance of land use permits for wireless facilities. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6001, etseq. A presumptively reasonable period of time for a local government to act on all relevant applications for a rooftop collocation is 90 days. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(c)(1)(iv). The Shot Clock date is determined by counting forward 90 calendar days from the day after the date of submittal, including any required pre - application period. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(e). Pursuant to federal law, the reasonable time period for review of this application is 90 days. VI. CODE ANALYSIS City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.320 Conditional Use Permit • 15.10.320 -Conditional use permits. (a) Intent. It is recognized that there are some uses which may be compatible with designated principal uses in specific zoning districts provided certain conditions are met. The conditional use permit procedure is intended to allow flexibility in the consideration of the impact of the proposed use on surrounding property, and the application of controls and safeguards to assure that the proposed use will be compatible with the 11 33 CONSULTING, INC surroundings. The commission shall permit this type of use if the conditions and requirements listed in this chapter are met. The allowed uses are listed in the land uses allowed table 15.10.225. Before a conditional use permit may be granted, the procedures specified in this chapter must be followed. Response: The proposed wireless communication facility is located in an Institutional, Public, Quasi -Public Use zone (INS). Seward Municipal Code (SMC) Section 15.10.225, allows a Commercial Communications tower less than 16 feet in diameter or 75 feet in height with a Conditional Use Permit. (b) Applications. Applications for a conditional use permit shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. The application shall include but is not limited to the following: (1) Name and address of the applicant; Response: The name and address of the applicant is included on the application and here for reference: ACOM Consulting Inc I Christine Bradford 1 5200 SW Meadows Rd Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (2) Verification by the owner of the property concerned if other than the applicant; Response: The owner of the property is included on the application and has signed the application provided herein as verification required. (3) A legal description of the property involved; Response: PARCEL NO. 1 Block 29, VACATION AND REPLAT OF BLOCK 29, CITY OF SEWARD, according to the official plat thereof, filed under Plat Number S-67, Records of the Seward Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. EXCEPTING THEREFROM Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Block 29, the point of beginning, thence West 87 feet; thence South 404 feet, thence East 87 feet; thence North 404 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL NO. 2 That portion of Block 29, VACATION AND REPLAT OF BLOCK 29, CITY OF SEWARD, according to the official plat thereof, filed under Plat Number S-67, Records of the Seward Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, more particularly 12 34 Acorn5��o �N:. described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Block29, the point of beginning, thence West 87 feet; thence South 404 feet, thence East 87 feet; thence North 404 feet to the point of beginning. (4) A description of the proposed use; Response: The applicant proposes to build a new wireless communications facility on the rooftop of a facility located at 516 Third Avenue in Seward, AK. The proposed use includes the placement of antennas and ancillary equipment necessary for ongoing operations of the wireless communications facility. The proposed facility will be safe, functional, energy efficient and compatible with the existing building use. Please see the attached site plan included in the construction drawings (Exhibit B) (5) Dimensioned plot plans showing the location of all existing and proposed buildings or alteration, and such data as may be required; and Response: A full set of construction plans with the location of the existing buildings and proposed facility is included herein for review as Exhibit B. (6) The appropriate fee as established by City Council resolution. Response: The applicant will provide payment for the fee required by the City Council resolution for the proposed project once the final amount due is requested at time of submittal. (c) Public hearing. If the application is in order, a public hearing shall be scheduled in accordance with the requirements of section 15.01.040 of this title. Response: The applicant is prepared to comply with all notice requirements necessary for a Public Hearing per the City of Seward Code Section 15.01.040. (d) Review criteria. Prior to granting a use permit, it shall be established that the use satisfies the following conditions: 0) The use is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and the purposes of the zoning district; 13 35 Acorn5��o �N:. "15.05.025(b)(11) Institutional district (INS). Public and private educational, administrative, government and health care uses, including public land reserve for future public development. The development standards are intended to set a high standard to assure that the activities provide visual amenity to the surrounding area. Response: The proposed use is consistent with the zone purpose and the existing use of the parcel because the rooftop already hosts another carrier's wireless facility and because the proposed new equipment placement is designed to blend in with the existing equipment on the rooftop of the building. See Exhibit F, Photo simulations. (2) The value of the adjoining property will not be significantly impaired; Response: Residents, students, businesses and first responders rely heavily on wireless networks to function for daily communications.. The ability to access reliable wireless communications enhances productivity, efficiency and safety for all those who, live, work or are visiting this area, providing additional value to the adjoining properties. (3) The proposed use is in harmony with the comprehensive plan; Response: The proposed use advances the goal to upgrade and expand connections with modern telecommunication networks to further support businesses and government operations as outlined in the 13.4.1 Communications section of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed facility will serve the surrounding community by adding coverage and capacity and providing additional cellular bandwidth in an area that is currently underserved. With the ever-increasing number of data intensive mobile devices that are now an essential part of everyday life, reliable and robust wireless service is both needed and expected by residents, visitors and businesses. In addition to providing improved service to Verizon customers, the proposed facility addresses the FCC requirements for enhanced 911 service (E911). The wireless E911 program allows public safety entities to report the telephone number of a wireless 911 caller and the location of the antenna helps provide more precise location information. (4) Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed use; 14 36 Acorn5��o �N:. Response: The applicant is proposing an unmanned facility on an existing structure with adequate structural capacity for the use. The proposed use will also utilize existing infrastructure for electricity and fiber for ongoing use and operations of the facility. No other public services or facilities are needed. (5) The proposed use will not be harmful to the public safety, health or welfare; Response: The proposed facility will comply fully with all federal, state and local safety standards. (6) Any and all specific conditions deemed necessary by the commission to fulfill the above - mentioned conditions shall be met by the applicant. These may include but are not limited to measures relative to access, screening, site development, building design, operation of the use and other similar aspects related to the proposed use. Response: The applicant acknowledges and understands all reasonable conditions deemed necessary by the commission shall be met. (e) Approval resolution. At any time after the hearing required in section 15.20.320(c), the commission may adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit provided that it includes findings of fact that the review criteria in section 15.10.320(d) have been met. Upon adoption, the City shall cause a copy of the resolution to be posted for at least ten days in at least three public places within the City. An appeal of the commission's action may be made at anytime until the resolution becomes effective. Unless rescinded, amended, or appealed any resolution adopted under this chapter automatically becomes effective ten days after passage and posting. Response: Acknowledged. (f) Modification of final approval. 0) An approved conditional use permit may, upon application by the permittee, be modified by the planning and zoning commission: a. 15 37 Acom When changed conditions cause the conditional use to no longer conform to the standards for its approval. Response: Acknowledged. b. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards for its approval. Response: Acknowledged. (2) The modification application shall be subject to a public hearing and a filing fee set by City Council resolution. Response: Acknowledged. (g) Expiration: extensions: transferabilit4 (1) An approved conditional use permit lapses six months after approval if no building permit is procured or if the allowed use is not initiated. Response: Acknowledged. (2) The commission may grant time extensions not to exceed six months each upon a finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently to warrant reconsideration of the approval of the conditional use permit. A request for an extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the permit. A public hearing shall not be required prior to granting an extension of time. Response: Acknowledged. (3) 16 38 Acorns��o ���.. A conditional use permit shall automatically expire if for any reason the conditioned use ceases for a period of one year or longer. Response: Acknowledged. (4) A conditional use permit is not transferrable from one parcel of land to another. Conditional use permits may be transferred from one owner to another for the same use, but if there is a change in use on the property, a new permit must be obtained. (Ord. 626, § 3, 1989: Ord. 649, § 5, 1991; Ord. 94-56; Ord. 97-15; Ord. 98-06) Response: Acknowledged. City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.250 Commercial Communication Towers 15.10.250 - Commercial communications towers. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish a process, rules, and standards for the siting and construction of wireless communication facilities to: 0) Protect and promote public health, safety and welfare; Response: Acknowledged. (2) Ensure that facilities are compatible with adjacent land uses; Response: The proposed facility will provide enhanced wireless communications and service to adjacent land uses and has been designed to minimize visual impacts. (3) Provide guidelines for the siting and design of communication facilities; Response: The proposed facility will utilize colors that will blend with the existing viewshed and is designed to minimize the visual impact on the surrounding area. The antennas will be painted a nonglare color that will blend with the surrounding environment that are complementary to the viewshed, also as required by the guidelines. Grey colors and/or earth tones, whichever is determined as best fit, will be utilized to ensure guidelines are met as required in the code. The antennas will be 17 39 Acorn5��o �N:. placed at the minimum height necessary to ensure minimum impact to the siting and design proposed. (4) Protect the City's environmental and economic resources including the viewshed; Response: The applicant proposes a facility on a rooftop in which there is an existing wireless use to avoid the need for a new tower. The antennas will be placed at the minimum height necessary to achieve the network objectives. The additional equipment will not noticeably impact the viewshed. Demand for wireless capacity is growing. more consumers are accessing wireless services every year, driving more modernization, and expanding access to public safety. The ability to meet this demand depends on the infrastructure that supports the services. The FCC has put in place steps to facilitate the deployment of the infrastructure necessary to support surging demand, expand broadband access, support innovation and wireless opportunity, and enhance public safety —all to the economic benefit of consumers and the communities in which they live. (5) Minimize the number of towers by encouraging the colocation of facilities and maximizing the use of existing structures; Response: The proposed facility a collocation on an existing structure. The proposed use will not require a new wireless tower. (6) Provide for the ability of communications companies to enhance wireless coverage and capacity services for the City's residents, businesses, and visitors. Response: Acknowledged. Supplemental definitions. (1) Total height. The distance as measured from the ground at the preexisting natural grade to the topmost point of the entire tower and attachments. (2) 18 40 Acom Equipment. Refers to satellite dishes, antennas, and other wireless electronics intended to transmit and/or receive commercial communication signals. (3) Stealth facility. Any tower/facility designed to make the structure look like something other than a wireless facility. Response: Acknowledged. (c) Permitting. The planning commission may approve a conditional use permit for a communications tower in the AC, HC, CB, I, RM, and INS zoning districts, subject to the conditions in this section and sections 15.10.220, 15.10.320. Response: Acknowledged. The application for a conditional use permit for a communications tower shall include the following information: a. A written narrative explaining why the proposed site has been chosen, why the communications tower is necessary, why the requested height was chosen, and a full explanation regarding the communication tower's ability to accommodate other providers; Response: A written narrative inclusive of the selection of the site location and justification is provided by a Verizon RF Engineer and is included herein as Exhibit A. b. Specifications for the communications tower and all equipment to be located on it, including a description of design characteristics and material; Response: A full set of the proposed construction plans inclusive of the communications equipment, design and materials are included herein as Exhibit B. C. A site plan drawn to scale showing property boundaries, communication tower location, communication tower height, guy wires and anchors and existing structures and land uses on the site and on adjacent property; Response: A full site plan drawn with the required boundaries, equipment location, height and uses of the property and adjacent property is included in the construction drawings on page A-1, included herein as Exhibit B. 11 19 41 Acom A map showing the locations of the applicant's existing communications towers that serve customers within the City, the proposed new communications tower, expected changes to the applicant's existing coverage and capacity within the City, and/or other improvements to wireless service; Response: A map with location of the applicants existing communications towers within the City is included with the U justification that shows the requested coverage and capacity for the area in Exhibit A. e. A report prepared by a person registered as a structural engineer in Alaska showing the structural capacity of the communications tower, the equipment type and number to be installed, and that the communications tower and antennas are designed to withstand winds in accordance with the latest revision of ANSI/EIA/TIA-222 standards ("Structural standards for steel communications antenna towers and communications antenna supporting structures"); Response: A full structural analysis for the proposed facility is provided by a structural engineer in Alaska to show the wireless rooftop facility will be constructed and able to withstand all required ANSI/EIA/TIA-222 standards. The structural analysis is included herein as exhibit D. f. Identification of the person or persons who will own the communication tower and the equipment that is to be located on it; Response: Anew tower is not proposed for this facility. The building is owned by Alaska State D N R - AVTEC. The wireless facility will be owned and operated on behalf of Verizon Wireless d/b/a Cellco Partnership ("Verizon"). g. Written authorization for the application from the owner of the site; Response: The application has been signed by the owner of the building in which the facility is to be collocated on as authorization of the proposed project and is enclosed herein. h. Evidence that the applicant has a valid FCC license for the use of the communications tower; 20 42 Acorn5��o �N:. Response: The applicant has a valid FCC license for the use of the wireless facility; a reference copy of the associated license is attached herein as Exhibit C. L A line of sight analysis showing the potential visual and aesthetic impacts of the communications tower on adjacent residential districts through the use of photo simulations of the communications tower, including all antennas, structures, and equipment, using three vantage points and photo simulations from locations requested by the planning department; Response: The applicant has included photo simulations from three vantage points included herein for reference as exhibit F. j• A written agreement, on a form approved by the city attorney, to remove the communications tower and restore the site to its original condition, and consistent to the natural grade, within 180 days after the communications tower is substantially unused for a period of 12 consecutive months, and providing that if the communications tower is not removed within this 180-day period, the City may remove the communications tower at the cost of the owner; Response: The applicant has provided a draft agreement regarding the requested terms of removal of the communications equipment and is attached herein for reference and review as Exhibit E. k. Any additional information required by the planning department during the application process for determination that all applicable zoning laws are met. Response: Acknowledged. (2) For permits issued under subsection (1) of this section, the applicant must show all applicable conditions are met as follows: a. Location and visual impacts. (i) The proposed location shall minimize the visual impact on the surrounding area while allowing the communications tower to function in accordance with minimum standards 21 43 Acorns��o ���.. imposed by the applicable communications regulations and the applicant's technical design requirements. Response: The proposed facility is a rooftop installation, rather than a new tower. It will utilize colors that will blend with the existing viewshed and is designed to minimize the visual impact on the surrounding area while allowing the communications tower to function in accordance with minimum standards imposed by the applicable communications regulations and the applicant's technical design requirements as required in the guidelines. The antennas will be painted a color that will blend with the surrounding environment that are complementary to the viewshed, also as required by the guidelines. Grey colors and/or earth tones, whichever is determined as best fit, are proposed to ensure guidelines are met as required in the code. The antennas will be placed at the minimum height necessary. (ii) Communications towers and attached antennas and equipment must be a color that blends with the surrounding environment or complementary to the viewshed. Muted colors, earth tones, and subdued hues, such as gray, are preferable. All associated structures such as equipment buildings, including the roofs, shall be painted with earth tone colors unless otherwise required under this code or other applicable law. Response: Please see previous response. No equipment building is proposed. (iii) Where necessary to make a communications tower compatible with the historical, environmental or cultural character of its location, the planning commission may require that the communications tower be stealth facility, hidden, or integrated as an architectural feature of a structure, to reduce its visual impact. Response: The rooftop design is consistent with the other structures in the area and will use appropriate paint to make the installation compatible with the surroundings. Inability to collocate. (i) The applicant must show that it is not feasible to locate the proposed communications antenna and equipment on an existing structure within the area required for service. New towers shall be designed to allow collocation of an equal number of facilities to the applicants present and reasonably foreseeable future requirements. 22 44 ((.0 Acorn5��o �N:. Response: Not applicable. The proposed facility is a collocation on the roof of an existing building. No new tower is proposed. A communications tower shall not be approved if it is located within one-half mile (2,640 feet) of an existing communications tower, unless the applicant certifies that the existing communications tower does not meet the applicant's structural specifications and technical design requirements, or that a collocation agreement could not be obtained. Response: Not applicable. A new communications tower is not proposed. C. Setbacks and safety. (i) In all allowable zoning districts, a communications tower must be located no less than a distance equal to the factor of 1.1 of the tower height from any lot line; or the towers highest engineered breaking point, as certified from a person registered as a structural engineer in Alaska. Response:Not applicable. A new communications tower is not proposed. (ii) The tower and facilities will be fenced for security and screening purposes, fencing shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Landscaping may be required as additional screening buffer between land uses. Response: Not applicable. The proposed facility is located on an existing rooftop (iii) The structure and accessory facilities shall meet all applicable laws and code requirements including but not limited to health, nuisance, noise, fire, building, and safety code requirements. Response: This requirement is acknowledged and understood. d. Zoning requirements. With the exception for those requirements, established within this section, the commercial communications tower must comply with all applicable zoning 23 45 Acorns��o ���.. laws and regulations, including all laws governing land development, parking, lot size, and storage. Response: All applicable zoning laws and regulations have been met. e. Signs. No signs may be located on a communications tower except for identification signage, and safety signage as required by law, regulation, and standards. Response: The applicant will post all required signage as required by law, regulation and FCC standards as indicated on page A-8 of the attached construction drawings attached herein for reference as Exhibit B. f. Lighting. No lighting may be located on a communications tower except as reasonably required for safety purposes or as required by the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Aviation Administration or other government agency with jurisdiction. Response: The applicant will not be placing any lighting other than for safety purposes to be utilized during maintenance. The FAA is not requiring any lighting. 9. Height. The height of a communications tower may not exceed the maximum tower height specified in the conditional use permit or in this section. Response: Not Applicable. A new communications tower is not proposed. h. Towers located on existing buildings. A communications tower may be mounted on an existing building, as long as it does not extend more than 30 feet above the roofline and the applicable conditions of this section have been met. For example, if a building was constructed to its maximum allowed height of 34 feet in a zone, a communications tower/antenna may be placed on it provided that it is not more than 30 feet above the highest part of the building. Response: The proposed facility is located on an existing rooftop and the facility does not extend more than 15' above the existing building height. The antenna tip height is 49'-0'; which does not exceed the 34 foot height maximum in the INS zone, plus the 30 feet allowed by this section. . 24 46 Acomsu�_������. Variances to development requirements may be granted pursuant to applications as provided for in section 15.10.325. Response: No variance is sought. (3) For permits issued under subsection (1) of this section, a. No decision regulating the placement, construction or modification of a communications tower may be made on the basis of environmental or health effects of radio frequency emission if the antennas and other equipment on the communications tower comply with Federal Communications Commission regulations. b. All permit applications shall be processed in a timely manner under the circumstances and not unreasonably delayed. C. Denial of any permit application shall be in writing and supported by substantial evidence. d. Appeals to the board of adjustment in the case where an application has been denied shall be made pursuant to section 15.10.410. Response: Acknowledged. City of Seward Zoning Code 15.10.220 Development Requirements 15.10.220 - Development requirements. (a) Table 15.10.222, development requirements, is incorporated herein by reference and the restrictions and annotations contained therein are mandatory unless otherwise modified by this chapter. (See table at the end of this section; see also section 15.10.210.) (b) Building height. The purpose of building height standards is to prevent loss of life or excessive property damage through the inability of the City fire department to reach upper stories or roofs and to help maintain the character of neighborhoods. Response: The proposed facility is located on an existing rooftop and the facility does not extend more than 15' above the existing building height. The antenna tip 25 47 height is 49'-0", which does not exceed the 34 foot height maximum in the INS zone, plus the additional 30 feet allowed by Section S.10.250. (c) Setbacks —Yards. Response: Not applicable. No new structure is proposed. VII. CONCLUSION As demonstrated above, this application meets all applicable code criteria and the Applicant respectfully requests that this application be approved. 26 48 US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC verticalbridgv, 516 THIRD AVE SEWARD, AK 99664 VERTICAL BRIDGE SITE #: US-AK-5264 VICINITY MAP AREA MAP PROJECT CONTACT LIST DRAWING INDEX PROJECT SITE — DRIVING DIRECTIONS START OUT GO AT ON I NT EINATONALAIPORTID FRED LEFT AT THE POIRTO CONTINUE ON VV INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DID TURN SLGHT LEFT ONTO A T=E ONTO M NNESOUR BE M NNESOUR BE BECOMES 0 MALLEY DID TAKE THE AN 1 A ED T TOWARD SEWARD MERGE ONTO A =HIGH—Y SEWARD CODE COMPLIANCE AFCVGORDFBYPTDHMl BEG PERFORMED AND NANTALLNETHIENSACCLO IDANCE -BET C ENOT CEO _0NA ONOTTE FNHLO"NG CODES AS CODES 20 20 UTILITY INFORMATION POWER COMPANY HOMER ELECTR C ASSOCIATION FIBER PROVIDER GO PHONE COX (9oi)PROTECT O i5Cs9T5 MANAGER PHONE F(90,)99 E PROPERTY O WNEAVUEC Box e89 SEWARD AN DUTY DI RECTORICUEF GOODS cell6151 OPE242939' IMPLEMENTATION CONTACT: FEARS' NCHOLS VER ION TBELLEVUE UE WRELEMA231Lc 3245 15808 NE (425) 531 5224 F—s. vim UlsvTo ver1-1. escom SITEACQUISITION: ROOM CONSULT NG NC IKE oSWEGO OR anchxraiob53s035 PHONE @a co STRUCTURAL ENAECTOR B I oEERTE iDi Ill WGALENA DRAPER UT '4020 ASE CONSULTANTFAME ACONCONSULTING INC NE (4 )209123 , OF_RsoU@—.co Us BUc com APPLICANT s g @ve CO -APPLICANT: VER SON ss(RA(dVAR SON WREL.ESS LLC 3245158EH AVENUE 231 ATIONs BELLE ZONING / PERMITTING:Al2 STRUCTURAL DETAILS CHRISTINE BRADFORD A, ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS ACO'CONSULTNG PC LAKEOSWAGO OR 033 PHONE (0 3)'099034 POSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION chliSIU9. a or @—.cl1s11P19Incmm H ELECTRICAL ENGINEER RF2 MOPROUNTING DETAILS PHo FRsol.ssoo2o PROJECT INFORMATION CODEINFORMATIONJURISDICTION C Ty OF SEWARD ZONING CLASS F CAT ON EAST END . XED USE CONSTRUCT ON TYPE HE OCCUPANCY UT L Ty PROPOSED BUILDING USE TEL SITE LOCATION (NA VD88)Econn GROUND ELATD'AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT. 9' (fOP OF BUILDING PARAPET) 49 (ANTENNATIP HEIGHT) GEODETIC COORDINATES MAD83): ALPHA SECTOR 'T TUBE GAMMA INITDDE SECTOR 4N,� 253D,ss A SCOPE OF WORK BY ING PC OP (VERTICAL BIZE LEASE AREA). PRo PosED INSTALLATI oN OF M) RANTENNASAN OOFTOP. DANOLaRAEODIPnnENTONEXISTING US-AK-1014 SEWARDAVTEC LEASE AREA SIZE: 516 THIRD AVE PARCEL SIZE: PARCEL NUMBER: 3 03 ACRES 14311003 Do NOT SCALE D OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ORSURE COVER SHEET , SEDED BY THE LAT EST PER So N ALL MOD T-1 GENERAL NOTES LINE/ANTENNA NOTES I "o" AT ALL COMPLY ITI ALL KOHL I ILI CODES OIIINANCII AND IIGl—IONA ALL 11 A11111 ALL EXISTING ININSIONA 11101 TO 111HORANG —IN PICISDA', L CMDA C"T , CATA ETC IElUIIED BY AUTHOR TI HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL BE PROCURED AN I PAID To, BY THE CONTRACTOR 17 VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL BURIED UTILITIES PRIOR TO MY EXCAVATION I ACo I LA N OF Co US UCT ED N ON I o I A T CLEM To C OND UCT ANY NVEST GAT ON AS TO 11 N DAWLAND COND�ONS POT-1 FCFUoNDN AT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL To BEG'oUNDED THE P, I A :N C I OPH REARD MS vAT I I AT IN CLU ING I UT NOT L.TEDTo ASBESTOS P, oToCoNCE AT ACXF, DAT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BECOUNNECTED THLITYESE MAF ToINTAINED AT ALLTIMEs ROD PRIORTOTowER ERECTION TOWER GROUND MUST BE MATE I ALS I F EV SINCE o F HAZARDOUS MATED ALS A FOUND WORK A TO PROCEEDWITH , BED AT PON AWARD CONTRACT THE FURTHER WORK UNTIL INSTRUCTED BYTHEOMER INVARITING ROWE I IF Y CONTRACTOR IS GENERAL I ALL MATE I AT F UP N I SHED UNDER TH A CONTRACT SHALL BE PROPOSED UNLESS ACHNOXXT ING NG APR TO AT ON F 0, ROWE I WELL IN AND AIR BAL I SCUSS ONS PATH THE OTHE 'PS SE N OF ED ALL ME A SHALL BE GUARANTEED AGANAL I EFE CTS IN MAT I I ALS POWER COMPANY ETC WORK THAT MAY DEVELOP DEFECTS NMATEALSO` PC "CANS 11 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN WG�TEN CONF IMAT ON OPOTHMED ED PECTED 11 R` IT HUE ROWE' COMPAN Y SU CABLE To PC CARE THE PO_' Co NNEC To N I Y OMER A I TH I GENE CAL C ONT "To' AND EACH SUBC NIACTO' A IT ALL BE= BLEF OR RED DATE THE GENERAL Co NTIACT 0, SIT ALL PIONDEAND MA NTAI N ATE MPO GARY VE 'I F y NG ALL EY AT NG COND T ON A AND U T I A AT THE j ON ST ASK A A GENERATOR UNTIL THE POWER COMPANY CONNECTION IS COMPLETED COSTSASSOCIATED STARTED NOC' M rloK C HT C ULUDMHA BEEN WITH THE TEMPORARY GENERATOR TO BE APPROVED BY THE OMER F 0 11 SE I N I Y AN � MN SS PFECT EXT RAHEOM PE IENSSAOT 0 N ON 7 1 C NT PC ENT' NOT N OF I S1, GO AND 'I ABOVE TH =AL C ONT IACTO I SHALL POVID:A T EM PONAy I TH I GENE CAL C 0 NTAYTO I AND EACH SU GO 0 N T IACTO' SIT AT BE N I I F OR GENER LOCAL NO COSTUOTHE OMER WON A UP BE I TH SCO CUP ACT ALL MANU FACTUI EIS I ECOMMEND ED SPEC F CATIO US 23 PLANS PART 0 FTH SSEL A' I COMPLEMENTARY N AT No TE To FACE PT T IT 0 SE A PRO F CAT ONS HERE N WHERE MOST AL, POINT SHALL BE COM PLIED PLAN I I AMIG A AND SPE C F I CAT ONS ARE NSTIU=S OoFSEPV GELAMND SPALLONERAIN WITH T HE CROP EITY OFTHEA`C IT TECT ETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EX ECUTED 0 1 N OF T HE y A, I NOT To BE USED By TH I O=NoGNMHP �E'T=PIOATE ` T HE CONTRACTOR SHALL VE I FY AND CO 0 IDINATE S' I A I LOCAL ON 0 F 'Lop IN NG A EXTENSION TO THIS PROJECT EXCEPT BYAGIEEMENT IN F 0, AT UCTU, M I C FAN C AT I LE CT, CAL PLUM BING CIVIL 0, AOC IT T ECTUIAL AS, I A COMP ENSAT ON To THEA`C IT T ECT T HE A I PLAIN A _' EPIEPRIED To BE SU BM TTED To 7 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VAR FY THAT NO CONDIT CTS EX ST BETEX` IN T HE TO CAT 0 N So F Co BE A AND IT ST HE SOLE I ESPO F THE OWNER ANDRAI CONTRACTOR TO BUILD L� IF CONTRACTOR 01 SUB CONTRACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO SEARLE FROM 'NAB I ALLT .. A"' 'T .. T"AL 'A .... A To' ANT .. A SUPPORT ASSRAILIS SIAL L COPPORIATOAST.AAGIONAST.A31 ALL STRUCTURAL MTM,,S To, STUYTU CAL STEEL FIRM NG SIT ALL Co NF OEM To AST' "' FASTENE I SSHALFBEll IN DAB EVE N G Ty RE Co NNE CT o US RX TH T FIEADS EXCLUDED F Co. T HE PLANE ALLED CA ED FAST ENE CA NUTS ANDWA I TV OTHERWISE NOTED CONZPERAPANSION ANCHORS SHALL B:HELIA =GBEIGAUNALNESSENTHEIWISE NOTED ALLANCHORS INTO CONCRETE SHALL L BE STAINLESS STEEL FY ND NOT I FVCONSULTANT OFANVDISCREPAN CVBEFORE STARTI NG CONSTRUCTION I PION BE LOCKWASHEIS FOR ALL MECHANI CAL CONNECTIONS FOR GROUND CONDUCTORS USE STAINLESS ATEEL HARDWARE THEM GH OUT I THOROUGHLYSIEMOVE ALL PAINT AND CLEAN ALL NET FROM SURFACES IE.UlING GROUND MAKE ALL GIO U US Co NNECT !0 US ASS SIT ONT AND 111 ECT AS ROSSI BLE AVO IS SHAI P BENDS ALL BEND STO BEA M N 0 FIE AR U F 0 G 'OU ND2G IT LD I NCTF IAM EXAN DSHATBCFGOL7AT ED G 10 U NOD EIRI A U SE A TWO 10 ILL IT OZE NEMA I LLTEO C ONCE 0 SU HA 0 APR, A I FOUR 7 FOR ALL EXTERNAL GROUND CONNEC ONS CLAMPS AN I CAD -LDS 'PLY A L GREAT PROTECT VE COAT NG 0, AN ANT OR I CO MPOUND SUCH AS NO OR SEA BY DEARBORN I E PA I ALL T HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THERMO ­D IN G U SE ED C 0 T 311 =MDG`BAlFl`COLDTHX LACK I NG PAINT I SIT ALL CONDUIT PENETRATIONS INTO MODULAR BUILDING WITH A SILICONE SEALANT AND ALL CONDUIT OPENINGS 11 ANTENNAS AND CO. TO BE PROVIDED BY VEIGON WIRELESS CONTIACTONTOCOODDINATE PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MO DIn CATONSMN THE D SO F THE CONTRACT WITHOUT THE CONTRACTOR GETTINCE T ON 'ESPONS FLY ETHEA FOR HIS APPROVAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WTH THE WORK NADDTONTIFECONTIACTOR BIMENSIONssHALLBEVERIFIEBANBNOTIFYTHEBONSULTTOFANYBISBREPANBIEs BUI�BINBAUTDE HORTIESOM BURINBTHEExEBUTIONYMOFTHEWOS ARPIOVALSAH FROMALL RANT VCTCLCdl verizon PROJECT INFORMATION CELLULARACA RER B THE COCUPBE WORK I UP TOR ISRESPONSIBLEFORADEOUATELCBRACINGANDPROTECTINGA55 ROM PRO�IBINBABOMP�ETEANBBORREBT�OB�TENACEEDTHIITEMNIMUMOT RELEVE THE CONTRACTOR SUB CONTRACTOR ANDDON OUIREB TO APPLICABLE CODES STANDARDS AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICESAGE COLLAPSE °CORDINGONS TO PR= COMPLETE RN SPECI PC THEN SERACED ONLY ByAIFOR R''ONWRELESSEoLOYEEESERVC PERSONNEL ORCROPIPISRNOSES0NLyTHA�AY y THUSC(> ,, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS ANITEMANNNOEPPI RaRNEQEUIPMON���'ASSAo��RWON�ZE�(I1CTU ELESH CA LWREE12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MEN'TS)REDUCED SPAY ING,ANDTO NCREASEILENGTHOE.BOLTLENGTHSBAR CONSTRUCT ON AND REPAR ALL DAMAGES TO BETTER THAN PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION HS, THEN IT SHALL BE DEEMED AND UNDERSTOOD TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 3 THIS FACILITY WSSCONSUME NOUNRECOVERABLE ENERGY a. NOPOTABLEWATERBUPPLYISTOBEPROVIDED ATTHIS LOCATION . CTOR � � .. . IE EL IT UDM PAI DCONSTRUCTIONANT Ey SJACENTSTRUCTUREBAROUNDTHEPRONECT THEBUILDINGOWNERSHAL DDTDDNEDETA G TH BECONTRACTDDCUMENTSANDBPROFICATIONSSHALLNDTBECDN RUEDTD BDLEANDFINALjUDGEABTDTHEQUA�TYDFTHE CONTRACTOR EAWOXRHMODIFICATIONSWHICHMATTBEMADESHAL MCAODEATTHECONTRACTORS THIS EDSHALLHTUAMREa0I0NSHIPOFANAHWSS WEENTHECON-R DTHE AR 13 DCDLIDWACTE LLILBBBENERAAERED EDAWAT RVPCIC�LAADOEPERCDN LLMAREANA R EDFDNE VERPERMONTHAT N=PCERV D DN TRIP ISIT WHERE "Opo SED FRANC CONCRETES DECKALKS OR PATHS ME' EXIST NG ELEVATION SO THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH TRANSITION 11 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MOD FY THE I AT NG FLOORS WALL CEIL NG OR OTHER LEGEND IMPORTANT NOTICE OR NUALRENBASAENNCOTV SUAL OBSERVATIONS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS REPRESENATCODMHE US-AK-1014 EVIATIONS RIONS CELNG RUC OR0P0SED REARRANGED OR -ERE THE EXPOSED OR HIDDEN MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMSBRCONST TON DOORS PA UCTURALMOD:!nRETOBEREMOVED MODIFIED GE AREADDEDORMODFIED THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL I EPAI I PAT CH AND _TC IT cP� SCALEDE TOOTH IN ALLPRO PRo3EOTREPORT.wTooNFDOTSOROISOREP.woIESTOTHE SEWARDAVTEC AIL NUMBER URGE POSED Co N STRUCT 0 NT 0 MATCH THE EX�T ING BOND -ERE CONCRETE CSOENDSTRURCCTOONNU To CONTRACT. sTRUCnoNED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE . ALL WORK SHALL BE COVERED UNDER THEGENERAL TO BE TaLNUMBER CONSULTANT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 516 THIRD AETAVF sEwARo,AH eeeea SHEET MBE I vvneeeoElwLEo i GENERAL NOTES REF ERENCED REFERENCE DRAWING AND SYMBOLS �RRAILNUMBER �'IRNNUMBER T-2 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e oamm vu cum. mwwExis FOURTH AVE LOT FROM FOURTH STREET vfftimi vwiz ,/ Asa �� O o ^ �ErvT� DORr _ O TD'UTILITY EASEMENT 0 �: Q --------------------- ALLEY ............... _______- — --- .. I cory auirlrvo b - \ RY E DVERZON ee AlvTevlvAAaaAY o R POF� Exo xE Ev or PE[UPo. ��/ECTOR U CAF�ERA rvS y . OHY I I I LA '� ------------ - --- ------ ------ U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516THIRDAVE SE—RD, AH eeeea ED AT NO Z sPARCEL EQMENT PROPEaTYA NEE r yp) UIP AREA THIRD AVE PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN A-1 51 PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 OO _ ---------- __7_' -/ nREA sEDUIPnnENi t - ________ PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .... ..'.'.""".'.' I I f ERM TORvX ST NG DO / c oewm vnn cu�x. cDMMENis o oa�cm vnn cu�x. cDMMENis I -- -- — L------ ------------- -- -- �---- � I I '---- I PROPOSE »�»» -J I SLEEPS ------ e wreuDDE ELESS NDUF F E mmm vw cuEx. mwwEx.s o oswm vw ioox rixucosrr PROPOSED 11ION wIRELESSAVFENNAARRAv ---------------------- (TVPOF3) �a ------------------ � 7 VeTCLCal w7 IiVt ■ }� ---------- EXISTING ----- ----- ---------------- DORnnlFoev ---------------- -- -------- ---- PROPOSED IELESS 111AGENR lD AREA (GRASS AREA) . EX SASNSG ........ . PROPOSED VERIGON VARELESS TEMPORARY GENERATOR ---- - - ACCESS ROUTE -----. . .----- ---� - - - - US-AK-1014 SEWARDAVTEC RDAVF ME-wARDRD,AR eeeea PROPOSED ENLARGED SITE PLAN PEX RATE R PARCEL A-1.1 LOT FROM FDURF ANUE 52 PROPOSED ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 EXISTING ROOF ACCESS HATCH W/GUARDRAL EXISTING DOGHOUSE EX AT G OTHER CARRIER CABLE TRAY (rv% riecv A2, KTSW/RUBBER PADS APPROVED EQUAL OR PCXBFG FFDVTENTl=TE LN ESSEXISTING OTHER RRER WITHa EQUI PMENT(TVP) PA PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION cucx.. 11 Vfftim El lii./i, [=—TNGBULDNGROOFTOP----- RF-, goo — EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP -✓ V�PIZOI'1 �^A*-� oI , cory auLneo, ec PROPOSED VERIZON VARELEss HYBRID CABLE (TYR OFF) DNIT NVORANG RANCETDBEMANTAINED,AND D UPUCT J/ECTOR U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516THIRDAVE MW ARD, AA R936P PROPOSED ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-2 53 PROPOSED ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 — -- m -- -- Ur — — — IXSTNG ROOF FRAMING (TVP) ---------- -- ------ PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION m IXI9FINc RooF AREA DRAIN ESS — --- — ----- --- BILN EL PLOED 1 WIRELESS PREFSTEP OVER �— PER MANUFACTURER Ai WITH RUBBER MA TS(TYR OFC a -- -- — — CENTER OVER BETWEEN THE (2) CABINETS— — — — O O ROOFTOP E.U=T PER FACTURER SEE OR DETAILS I I . — HVBRIDPROPOSCABLERI �N WIR) LESS I m I I lz�— PROPOSED SITE PR01 asPi54L _ o_—______ I PADS OR APPROVED EQUAL ER x� vffti y� Y1.11.L1Q V�PIZOII xvev o xvev o xvev o -- io PRDPDSED D DID MOUNTINB SITE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - __ P — aA TRIPOD ORAPPROVEDEOUAL ---------------------------- PROPOSED' FRA EwI=I�� �o�a�L,l�o WIRELESS — --------------- eINET�TELCDlIB RCABINET -- NITS "OR' -- C EAR NCETOBEM o, ---- ------------------------- l�� P SEDVERBONIRELESS S NTENNAATT DIED To ------------------------------ EQUIPMENT CA INETSEEWP4 ��°�x�xD.xEDxx OR ` U S-A K-1014 I SEWARD AVTEC 516THIRDAVE M-RD,AKR9664 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PLAN A-2.1 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PLAN 1 EXISTING ANTENNA SUPPORT PATH ANTENNAAND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS PROPOSORAO GAMMA SEBRMPIOON= E CUNTYONTN ANTENNA A MO(TROED SCUvteSAMNI-5 DUAL A BRACKET OR POPE OID uAL(BETA &GAMM4 RZONTENNAS(TVPo4F PER oRST E SEC NTOfl), ADJUST PIPE MASTS AS ROPOSED VERIZON RADIO aa49 RE]UIRED TO ACHI EVE2a POPE VAR GPS EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPO MANUFACTURER a TILITV H rHAmt PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCT ION (TVP OF 3 -1 OR) PROPOSED VAR SON RADIO 8843 MOUNTED BEHI NO ANTENNAS (TYR) PROPOOF 3D1MPOUR TECGTSYSTPROl MOUNTED BEHENOSANTESNRNAB (TVP) TRPD ITS PEN PEN EfRATING RIPODOR PROVED EQUAL IT VP OF 3- PER TOR) EQUIPMENT AREI NET PER MANUFACTURES OFT OR BATTERY CABINET PER MANUFACTURER e e PER _ ANTENNA MAY TIP HE GHT 4, TOP OF(q PARAPET mm Er e e ertiml EXISTING �44LR PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 1 v47 i�J DUAL -MOUNTANTENNABRACHOTOR APPROVEDAL(-ASECTOR) PROPOED VERISON CART 04441 MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (TYR � ccs aviDv.O ixs auwnox Dr,wrexws,wouurceomaMex.Ov euu,w..... rvnmuii.e. ��' PROPOSEDSON CAR Eon MOUNTEDBEHIND ANTENNAS(TYR) PROPOSED MOUNT NG TRPD ITS NqL PENETRATIIN oR APPROVEDPOF3- P D� ) PR POSED DANCILLARYEQDIPMPORTEN OTHERS ASRYPHO 4 2 ORS ADJUST PIREMASTSAS REQUI RED TO ACHI EVE240. C SPAC NG ALPHA EDTOR) DCTOACITEABTPIPEMAATBAB IPI �E..a. �aEo a�..Pa..�O aw�.� o ao o,0a ON US oPREM VERVANTENNA MAY TIP GH7� �Dao � ��/ECTOR TOP oEp PHAPET� U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 TH I RDAF M-RD, AK RV664 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A-3 55 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 2 OSED BOX PER PROPOSED ADI U AT P RE MASTS AS RE U�.vizox v.av=s.x.wn�.. CPS ANT EN UP ATTAC DIED To EQUIPMENT CAN NET PROPOSED AERIZON RAN O 4445 P'oPoSOFT OR MOUNTED BEHINDSANTENNNAS ()YC EQUIPMENT CABINET PER MAN UFACTUDIED PROPOSED VERIzoN RADIO 8843 PROPOSED1 PER IT FRAMEMOUNTED BEHINDSANTENNNAS ()YC MANUFACTURER PROPOSED OAP. MOUNTED (P) VLWANTENNA MAX PROPOSED ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT ()VP. OF 3) f PURNoTpR`UTEDN`CEG RED TO — PAINTUOMATCH PROPOSED BULDNOROUTE FROM GENERATOR RECEPT TO TRPD ITS PEN MOUNTING PENETRATINGTRIPODTRIPOD OR THECnDA ILC @ EQUIPMENT AREA APPROVED EQUAL ()VP OF3-1 PER SECTOR) OF (E) PA PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRopo SED VERZoAS(TVPOFaC2 GAMMASECTORS) ADJUST PIPEMASTSAS ■ PROPOSED VERIZON ATOUR RL WIRELESS (+3 AGu Yl.l lll.Ql ��r� PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 1 v47 izow C B PRo ANTENS) AD GAMMASE Eoro HETRETNGTMPCDOR TRA ITSP°MTYR O 3 1 PER CU DdPERAPPRovEDEQUAL (TAPOF3 ,PERSECTOR) DUAL MOUNT A BRACKET OR APPROVED EQUAL (BETA Q`IAMk A ` °NRF oF2PER SE MR),ARRVUP PI REQDIREDTDA3HIEAEL4 DGSPA3ING PROP oNPROPOSED AN PIPE MOUNT (TYP. OF 3) MOUNTED BEHIND NTRE E R s YF P7o SECToo10-3 a.o.D,A..=..ASA.=iLaa.=oiPM=..Da nnoUNTEDBEHwDANTENnIAs(TVP) ND PN CILLPRV EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS (N VZwANTENNA MAX TIP HEIGHT TOP OF(E)PARAPET `llV�l-1'1 >�/ECTOR U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 THIRDAVE sEwARD, AK RR664 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A-3.1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 2 VNIELE . ANT El UP RE PRO PROPOSED 200A ILC PER MANUFACTURER D UTILITY H FRAMEPROPOSED Ox PER MANUFACTURER CPS ANT ENNAALTAC HER To EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOS ED ARE R VLW ANTENNA MAX EQUIPMENT CABIN Ef PER MANUFACTURER ( BATTER Y CAB NET PER MAN U FAC THE ED �1�.. THE2➢DA ILCD@EQUIPMUTE ENT PREA RRECEPT TO ��.. OF (E)PARAPET PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Y 1.11.L1.Q1 I ❑❑❑❑❑ EaD,aE�Dao ❑❑❑❑� �/ECTOR US-AK-1014 EWARD AVTE SC 51B THIRDAVF sEwARo,AH eeeea EII;41ISTFLR ❑ ❑_ —_ —_ —_ —__ 6am�-- ------ ------ -- - -- -- - - -- - - - - SS MOUNTED ON EPAL� ( 3OPOSEDIRIZON 6 AGO TEMPORARY PROPOSED GENERATOR ENLARGED ELEVATIONS A-3.2 5' PROPOSED ENLARGED WEST ELEVATION 1 ROOFTOP COPY FRA— (4) CADLE RUN4S MAY. SELF SPL C COVE' NCLUDED(DIFFER PADS NOT NCL'DED)EPE COVER HE GHT IS 3 1 A FROM TOP OF SLEEPERS OVERALLD sIONSFORTRAVARE1119/32 x 35C TENNA 1 1/4 SLID PIPENOT (suPPU ED SV VLC9 DElC"TASREOD PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR APPROVED EQUAL GPS CO. CYCLE STEEL POST' ANTENNA P RE MOUNT Y 1.1 lll.Ql F ROOFTOP CABLE TRAY DETAIL 1 GPS ANTENNA MOUNTING 12 VWIZOW 3 KID (4) ,aS m sOLTs PER MFR AILGALV AT 1 EDON Gcp,E oDIPM NTCADIN DY �YDUT(3DDDIeMAC PIPE MN NEKLUT(RP1 om UNISTR s s — - —ti N P R oD LUMN SEEDETAILS NEW,rz.mG�PECDLDMN WAs"ER NUT Ea Dr aE�Dao. �xoixe ��/ECTOR , ou NT1 NG RITE oD1,MENT DD�eMm (4)1rzmsOLTSPEUMFR MINI EDGEDIsrBOLTCP ° ° ° wane rvP PLAN SECTION AAA SECTION s-s w1D.9 w"TH s"ER s,N°T. uwsTRUT1ia°-2 SPRING s1rzroOLUMN PART-142o) MDa'N7"T"R EouIPMENT NITT(UNISTIUT11DDs 4�' PwecowMN cPLATe D CAP SCREW HEX 7, 4 US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC s1s T"IRDAVE sEwARD,AV eessa CONSTRUCTION ffi UP W10w CHANNEL STRUT P PLAN DETAIL C DETAILS A-4 OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT TO STEEL BEAM DETAIL 13 w"gong H-FRAME DETAIL 14, XLENNA PER MANUFACTURER SEE 1NRF 3 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS COMMSCOPE DUAL MOUNT RRU PER MANUFACTURER, TVP. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS IOOFTOP E.0 PMENT CAS NET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RD HD I EN PER MANUFACTURER SEE6,DF3 AD PER ITT TY IT FRAME MANUFACTURER OOOO POD OR PENET"T NO APPROVED EOUAL SEERF2200A PER ER OOOO®o O 1 %FACTU 0 veeee W 0. (E)2,P&RAEATHInIc ® ege (E)POOLINSUL --� ��V�PIZOI'1� STEP RPROPOSDEH ND W,D� ON"DEAM q ROOF 3D ST y OF EM PROPOSED EQUIPMENT STRUCTURE ELEVATION 1 SITPEEVER ALL TO 2 Sp IN ED >�/ECTOR EDOEDIST-„1IIEFINMIN /X P HSB 3/am WDM US-AK-1014 0 / SEWARD AVTEC sieTwRO AVF sEwAID,AKR-1 WBM ����/ A ' "16�� STRUCTURAL II II II II II II I DETAILS A-5 ,..�..,D,-D. SLEEPER — — — ALPHA SECTOR PARTIAL PLAN DETAIL 2 BETA SECTOR PIARTIAL PLAN DETAIL F3 W BM TO W BM 4 NEW ROOF MEMBRANE BM,PER PIN W/��IIxDEAD'DP TO NEW FR=PERX6, MANUFACT WEATHER PRO F WARRANTY2x6 2W-ERE4X6 EXISTS BERL SCREWS OTTOM PENETRATION @1'X euc5 TIMBERLOCK BCREw (E)2z PARAPET ALL SHEATH NG NEW ROOF M=NE W/AS/a�%13 PER PLAN FAG (4) LOCVTVP RRO ACM WARNRTRANTY F 2X6 WHERE4X6 BCTIMBERLOCOK PAS 4X6 @ 24"OC, 3"MIN ION@2X IRS SCREWS OK ()2z PARAPET WALL ALL (62X STUDS@ ,6 OC NEW ROOF MEMERRANE wG RE REIN CS )'4"m 4W (4) LOCSDEBTYR X6X12 ATEAB M 24 MANUFACTURERS AMPAPINRTOAIIN DROROFING WARRANTY WHERE ax6 EXIST (,)TIMBERLOCK 4X TO P AND BOTTOM aX6 @WTI"OC 3 MNPENET ON@ 2X BLKG P DEC IRS I SCR RA PAR SHEATHING L (E) 2X STUDS @ "OC PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION X6X12 ATEAB M X6X12 ATEABEAM — 24"min. RLAPPIN6 OVE EX ST NG ROOF FIN TL mn. — 2a"min. ER,AFFIN6 OV IXISr NG ROOF NG TL mn. — ERIAPPINs OV EX ST NG ROOFING ,2 min. E' E GRACE XISTING =IMS — EXISTING ROOF M ME RACE — EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE — 117 WSTACKED 4' VERTICAL TOI MBERLOCK SCREW@, 6" OC, 3" MIN PEN BM (E)ROOF JOIST (E(GL BM w/(,) VERTICAL �I MBERLOCA SCREW @,6" OC TO MATCH JOIBTBPACIN6, 3@' iNPENIRS vV (A T Md ER i K NSILSTOJRERAS NO BLKG EOUI REDBLKG C IF JOISTNAILS �ROOF�0S' w/(,) V ERTI CALTIMBERL ATC SCREW @,6" OCTO MATCH JOIS) ACING, 3"MIN PEN @2X BLKG SPACING (4)) ROOFerti 2`4 TO TO (AT01aSCRE a" (E)BLOCKING@24�o _Y�__ ;� N W BEAM TO DBL 2x WALL+GL BM 1 W BEAM TO DBL 2x WALL+JOISTS 2 W BEAM TO DBL 2x WALL+BLOCKING 3 V�PIZOIIJ PRDPDSEDSITEPRD, PTR TR TRA RIPDDORAPPROVEDE6UAL BTDTHR� (47,rz"BAT EA LE SO B MPLT PurznOM 10 (3)Loc 4-0..,2� IEPV R -O ) FRONT OF BwETS BETWEEN 4° .°.B-0° SLEEPER *ECTOR e - — ----- aaw" ------------- ------------ ----------- nl-- -- US-AK-1014 SEWARDAVTEC 516THIRDAVF sEwARD,AK eeeea --- — --- -- ------------ _-------_. �___---------- - — — — — To — — - — — — — — 12'-4" ----------—,B-4-,,, ----- — ----—————------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -------------- STRUCTURAL DETAILS A-5.1 — E ANTENNA MOUNTTO STEEL BEAM DETAILI4 60 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT STRUCTURE PLAN 5 =D PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 14 yeraml V�PIZM� >�/ECTOR US -AK 1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 TNI RDAVF sEWARo, AR RR STRUCTURAL DETAILS A-5.2 s, HE ANTENNAMOUNTING RATES). SE ILT BRACKETSIRE MOUNT BRACKETS PLtFE.EODGETO.FNCLLNEOMETEEAI=I EDGE UN A UT I o MOUNTING BRACKET — BAC ARM WITH WEIDIK—A COVER DEGTILT TOR i 0 ARM covER NOT SHowN PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6� 627281 BRACKETS L� COMMSCORF INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA NI BSAMNT-SBS-1-2 ?" ©.. �....,... m Az .e....� �T �� -47 IzM ,,/ A B C ... .x, e. .,.... ....a.. 1T 7r� ® ® ® ® ® ®AIM A B C n. ® COMMBCORFINC. OFNORTHCAROLINA awl BSAMNT-SBS-2-3 ���_ is °�""pSAMNTsaszaL q2� ix�v DrvEmvo n ��VECTOR US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC siBTwRD AVE sEASED, AK 99B64 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS A-6 sz ANTENNA SIDE -BY -SIDE MOUNTING DETAILS 1 / ' ' 'E l ' � `RE STHIS ENo STHIS ENo R STEPSTHIS (TYR OISEINO~ EMOVE REMOVE STEP PRELIM INARV DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r sEc.ioxnw FO I I I .b_®a.....R.r 'u°� F w '^ E mmm vM cu�x. COMMENTS o oawm vM �oox rixucosrr Vffdcd C REMOVE STEPS THIS END ."°.,.000,_•°....e a•�oX.N�.:'EroIXio. lm. w 1 cuEx.. izonl �aci—.. V-.....�,^..,.o�, w. �*ECTOR � ExoxE�ox. � � .. . .��..E�.._...._°°..,�.,_._,. US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516THIRDAVE S-RD,AKR9884 IvoTe HE ETH�osrE�Ps oleo To m°L �� �SE�TIo sA 0 THE rizi Sr�I`�NS'PB�IrI E E CONSTRUCTION DETAILS A-7 STEP -OVER SPECIFICATIONS 1 "" T, CASE UNIVERSAL PIPE -TO -PIPE CLAM SET #UPC1 2 verizon✓ RADIO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY SITE NAME oom LOCATION CODS- - NO FCC ASR# - - CONTACT PHIS°°5335553 - -O TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING SIGN NOT TO SCALE VERIZON SIGNAGE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS LETTERING ETIT1AIGH MIN STROKE D CT ONAT °UIR jEo FLAMMABLE LREIQUIDS SIGN NOT TO SCALE NO SMOKING INJHIS AREA KLETTERING ErI1A N STROKE REQUIREMENTSWRELESS NO SMOKINGSIGN NOT TO SCALE ACAUTION AWARNI ON RF NOTICE SIGN N OF TO SCALE RF CAUTION SIGN NOT TO SCALE RF WARNING SIGN NOT TO SCALE INFORMATION ANTENNA AND OBEY ALL POSTED SI GN A CONTACT ERIS)oFTHEANTENNAANBETGOE VVORW NG CLOSEE THE o-TH 3FEEf FR o.TH TENNAR) CONTACT 'E' 'ON AT (FERI FV PHONE" PRIOR To ANTENNAS THIS IS SITE. CONTACT THE MANAGEMENT OFF CE FTHIS 000, HATCHreATE IA FOUND UNLOCKED. INFORMATION SIGN NOTTOSCIE STAINLESS RE 'U `DRILLEED RRAPOF4) WCKGRDDND 1 REQUIRED BLUE BACKGROUND � BACKGROUND YELLOWlElU DIED REQUIRED WNTE BAY KGROUND NFPA 704 PLACARD N4 NOT TO SCALE SIGNAGE NOTES1 SIGNS � PLACEMENT A LOW LEVEL (BLUE) WARN NGSIGNS-PaOEAT SITE ENTRYjACCESSPoNTSoNLY ROOFTOPS RICE SGNSON THEINSIDE OF ROOF FoRACCESS N THESE CASES CONSULT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OR CC SUPERVISOR WATER TRICKS PLACE SIGNS ON COMPOUND CATE VER11ON OWNED SITES RICE ONE SIGN ON SITE CATE B EN STEIP THE TENNAS IS POSSIBLE ZSTAINLESS ESR'ALESSTECHSCREWSPARTICIPATIONNN 2 CC SITES WFERE SIGN PLACEMENT IS PARTICU FAIRLY ON SPECIF�N VISIT MAY BE REQUIRED TO F U ILL ILL RE U REM ENTS FOR EACHSITEASTHOSEOCCCC ILL CALL OUT A GN LOCAL UR ATTHE WEWALK NOT YET CONSTRUCTED CC WILL BE ASKED o° LFIDEOPTHINTAIOR SIGN PLACEMENT THAT WILL BE SLP SHEETED NUDEXSTING SETS US WILL BE N STRYKAT FINT WAREHOUSE To BE DISBURSED AS PART OF THE GC BOM AS CALLED OUT IN ­ R—INGS FOR EACH SITE 4 SIGN D SIGN STANDARDS NSTIL PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FCC AND VARZoNPXRELESSGUDELNES F ORARECIFICATIOON NA�Eo DEDBD�CONTRACTOR R=oA; ALL TEXT FONT IS ARIAL UNO GooRHINAToRPH°(a25)8957ooRNG FROM GNS RUCOMPLIANCEMANAGER RECOMMENDATIONS TEXT FOR A GRACE SHALL ND CATE CORRECT A vertidbmw SITE NAME SITE Tft( FIR In NO TRESPASSING VERTICAL BRIDGE SIGNAGE DETAIL PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Vei'd dl wizoW EN�\/ECTOR US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 TH I RD AVE SE—RD, AK R9364 SIGNAGE INFORMATION A-8 PROPOSE PARELANDENNA ANTENNA MOUNTED TO PIPE MOUNT ANTENNA EPA_ R UN APPROVED EQUAL PROPOSED 11U MOUNTED GET ND ANTENNA PROPOSED GAP MOUNTED ON q a OR PROPOSED MOUNT NO SYSTEM APPROVED EQUAL „ b FOR PROPOSED QEAIIMENISIHD�IDHEDEIwL PRELIMINAR V DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED ANTENNA AND AN CILLECRY EQUIPMEN T SCH EFULE Yx AN N NHHLF I REB SE CTOR), ADJUSTSPIPEPMASTS A9 ROPOSEoa:.s xSD SLEEPER ALPHA SEC REQUIRED TO ACHIEJE2a" 0 C. SPACING. SEE PROPOSEDTOMMSTLM „RF DEQUAL(ALPHA aRAcM�oRAPP DAL -MOD S —', SECTOR SEE„A6 PROPOSED a 6 � D SLEEPER , � PROPOSEDVARF 3F 3 � N R D 04449 PROPOSED OAP MOUNTED ON MOUNTS BEHIND ANTENNAS(TFR) , D OSED ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT SYSTEM SITE R P°OF3) SEEa,RE3 NPUNETRAR NO , RSALAPPRovEo PRO, TED RPD_Ho-PE CLAMPSETADPC,VER D TRIPOD DRAPER SECTOR) R� OE ERUA SEE „A, RADIO P RS TOR, SEE„RF_L PROPOSED PER SECTOR) �Nd ROPOF D-, HINDANTOR MDDNTEDDEHINDANTENNASRYV P PER —HE PROPOSED oP LP ----- ASCED NASASACPOFaARREEoJj° OAA BETA MM VUR,AE �• HIEVE24 OGSPACING SEE„RF3 � Q^'D PROPOSED a M 0 SLEEPER fftimi cuE x.. V�PIZOII� ��/ECTOR U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC THIRD RV — sEwCO ARo,AH eeeea PROPOSED PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION RF-1 TYPICAL ANTENNA AND ANCILLARY MOUNTING 1 ;;: "'"°"„ PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION 2 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION rEm ory I No. N LE wr. wr zaie",z-pie", o-WOPELv e xzazssi U111 erE Paoi ae ... ... ... ... ... .... 11 lsw II +L A � cuExr. I �I vffdcal vw'Zon,/ DETAILB =?Dl[AIL A ® cURv iB MyAI C m Ev or vEmvo. CTOR DETAIL C TOLERANCE NOTES 11 ooiol rvocorviIE ITEIVOLLF SE EN Escvw.iox 7Rlvoo PRO ®i-®e-ss3-saa cEKNeV v42Da TRPPHPPEN og US-AK-1014 - e1 2 cusroMER eMcv4iwla TRP0.H0.PEN SEWARD AVTEC 516 THIRD AVE SEWARD, AK 99664 MOUNTING DETAILS R F-2 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS 1 ALPHA SECTOR fiBETA SECTOR NHH 65C ROD GAMMA SECTOR LU LU (ID NHH-55CRLO FRONT SEE O_ — M2 o �Q 2 2 919 11 9 70 51 5 LBS L RSR. 119 ,o S,sLaS INGHARNWAREPER iiE]--- PIN AEVV 910 IIIIIIIIIIIIVIIVIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIVIIVIIIIIIIII i � IIIIIIIIIIIIVIIVIIIIIIIII m IIIIIIIIIIIIHIVIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIVIIVIIIIIIIII PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION _........................... ANTENNA DIMENSIONS 1 ERICSSON RADIO 4449 DETAIL (700 / 850) 2 PLAN VIEW f i IIIIIVIIVIIVIIIIIIIIIVIIV ( i IIIIIVIIVIIVIIIIIIIIIVIIV ( i IIIIIVIIVIIVIIIIIIIIIVIIV VIE PLAN1130 m m - 0 0 a a W P 16 COLOR LIGHT AMOUNT,1260 ve fralb vw!Zon,/ ERICSSON RADIO 8843 DETAIL (AWS / PCS) 3 RAYCAP OVP SPUTTER DETAIL 4 OR >�/ECTMODEL CUBE eaSELx HE CUT 74o -qr DEPTH 3ff� • COLOR OFF TE • 1 pLp lAN moon OPENI 0000 -sir zz•'3L o 0 �1o PN m00R OPEND READ US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 THIRD AVE M—RD, AH RR664 RF EQUIPMENT R F-3 BATTERY CABINET DETAIL 15 1IT TonALE EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAIL 16 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AK2 — SEWARD [3 Sector — (4x4 700/AWS)]. a = SECTOR 1 ® 90' �a,�,3.a� SECTOR 2 ® 190° SECTOR 3 350° �a,�,3.an vffdc ll vwiZon,/ STRUCTURE/SHEET STRUCTURE/SHELTER STRUCTURE/SHEL R STRUCTURE/SHELTER STRUCTU /SHELTER ixccv or vccDvo. LR ECTOR US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516THIRDAVE SEWARD, RC 99664 PROPOSED IT DIAGRAM R F-4 se PROPOSED IT DIAGRAM 1 GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES LEGEND GENERAL I RGAM RE TIE A T E CORD T ON A VERY CAREFULLY AND TIE SCOPE 01 PROPOSED I�ZGITOGETNSI TH EQUPMNT ANDNDWRNGMADE D.EECESSARYTOACCOMMODATETHEELECTRICALSYSTEMSSHowNAND SYSTETRADE MCFhAYS AND ­ ALLCONDUITSHALLBEULLABELED. ALL EMPTYCONDUlrSINSTALLEDFORFUTUREUSESHALLHAVEAPULLCORD. SHEET METAL B olES SHALLoRISCoowGANTOFALLTOBSITECONDITIONSANDWORKTOBE AHALL BESIZEDIPRO CON DANCEWPHNEC UNLESS NOTED OTHER vNSE ONFORM TO NEMA OM CAST METAL BOXES "ALLcoNFORMTONEMAeLAND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION a ©, FUS Co v, IT DPANELBOARD SFo PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. AND I PERF ORM DETALED VAR F CATION OFrRKPERNONROTTOCORTDOETRHNEGCTOHNESELECTRICAT EUD= C IRS GROUNDING®KLONVALT THEELE LA BECARRIED HOUR METER DENOTES CABLE OR CONDUIT T =UT PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I ON N ALL RE RMTS PAY ASSOC AT SCHEDUCONTRACT ANDSRECCESENT IT AS LLY COMPLETETHISOPERATIONALTPROT IN ORAOANCEWTH THE THE OUT IN ACCORDANCE CS TH THE CURRENT NFPA STANDARD SAN D VERRICO'N =FEM SEN STANDAR D A GROUND LUGS ARE SPECIFIED UNDER SECTION 3 CONDUCTORS AND coNNECTORS. Q DENOTES CABLE OR ,IUNCTIION OXmI IN PLAN VIEW AT CTI ON OF THE OMERRAC I PROVIDEALLIBOR MATERIAL ElUPMENT E AND SERV CE A To Co A POOL ECTIN E CONTR PC ESEN T FAST ULLYOP =1 TO THE 3 ALL NDLUG AND COMRPORESSI F COMPRESSION SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI AGENT SUCH AS NO 4 GROUND ALL EXPOSED METALLIC OBJECTS ON EQUIPMENT ROOM CATERION © PULL BOX TO NEC/fELCO STANDARDS OVER HEAD UT LIT ES R GO LCO CARRY OUT WDRKIN ACCORDANCE PATH ALL GOVERNING STATE, COUNTY AND LOCAL CODES AND OSHA CooE ALL POWER AND TPARRIXRMTAO INVOLVED. APPLY TOTHIS SITE ALLvvORKTO COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE UTIHTIES 5 PROVIDE LOCK WASHERS FOR ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS FOR GROUND CONDUCTORS USESTAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE THROUGHOUT. DO 7 RENOT INSTALL GROUND RING OUTSIDE LEASE GROUND CONNECTIONS, REPAINTTO MATCH AFTEOVE ALLR CONNECTION IS MADE To PAN T AND CLEAN ALL MNNTAIN CORROSION RESISTANCE. — — - — — - — a' UNDERGROUND POWER MECHANGROUNDICAL CONNECTION (egDEXENOTOHTEESRMRIECFE-RELNDCCEONNONTEECTIOLUG, GTPPL SHALL SCHEDULE THE WORK IN AN ORDERLY MANNER SO. NOTTO IMPEDE PROGRESS OFTHEPROROD G CAL G GOTJECT ROSS FILE A'FAN yBEND SHALLNO TrGROUND BURIBENDEDGROTALLNOF FEE " GGOT NDINGCoNDUCTORSAHALLBEROUTED DOWNWARDTOWARDTHE UND RING H ro OR OUN D ROD H IN SPECTI ON SLEEVES BAR PIN AND SLEEVE RECEPTACLE CABLE LOCATONS UPON CO MPLET ON OF THE INSTALLAT ON TRANSFER ALL R T 0 B LACK L 'ECORD DATA PR NTS OF THE 0 CONSULTANT RIGIN DRAWINGSANDSUBMITTH EDR WINGSASRECORDDRAWINGSTOTHE NECLAMP DIE OF 7,) AR AFT EBE FAILRTHELYDURIJOB PERIOD SHALL BE CORRECTED I ONCE UPON WRITTEN NOTIFICATION ITHEEXPENSEOPTHE CONT DAYTON ICKGBLAY HASNSE PIP MP DCYLINDRICAL NDYGM TALLICSERIESSWTHACLAMPNLNNUNION OFSERISUBSTUTE ACC 0 ALLGROUNDCONNECTIONSSHALL BEAPPROVED FOR THE METALS BEING CONNECTED 11 ALL EXTERNAL GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY VVELDED ALL EXOTHERMIC WELDS TO Q GROUND CONDUCTOR OTOEWLHORSEPO RR TING VeiClCdl �Z N OF C OMM E RC AT POWER FRO M CONTRACTOR THE POWER COMPANY RK W TH T HE GENERAL YELECTRIC CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATETHIS OC TELEPHONECO P Y APPLY FOR TELEPHONESERWCEIMMEDIATELYUPONAWARDOFCONTRACT BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS EXTE R 0 R GROUND RING SHALL BE THE PARILEL TYPE EXCEPT FOR THE - CH RE ECTEE ACT HER MC_ LD A RE PAR ALL GALVAN ZED SURFACES THAT HAVE BEEN "ELDINGUSE SPRAY GALVANIZER SUCH ASHOLUBLECTROSOL.1101 DAMAGEDBYEXOTHERST LED So THE REPRESENTATIVECANINSPONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FYTHE CoECTTHEGROUNDRINGNAGE BEFOREITHEISB CEDwILL OWPRINGS ITSoIL 13 FOR METAL FENCE POST GROUNDING USE=WDUTHYNTYPOEFGER.OUUPNMDENNG CILAMPOR COOTHERMIC-LD ABBREVIATIONS PC CRGB �owFlINISHEo RIECwACITY CONDUIT CELL REFERENCE GROUND BAR COPPER ARIEDCT CAL ANND orHE �`PO° aELO°AL"�ooESAOREG�aT USCEPEDBYTHELOCAL 2 ALL MATERIALSAND ElUPMEN T SHALL BE PROPOSED A AND ElU DIRECT SHALL BE THE 'UCTQUIREMADEMENTS TO THE CONTRACT RESTAN CARD PRODUCTS OF MANUFACTURER A CURRENT= NALANY F EST CLASS PROD RE MANUFACTURE USED PROVIDING CONFORMS CONNECT ONTO POST GROUND I F ,a -ERE ECHANICACONNETOSIo��OLEORCo VREFUSNOALOXEDA°RoxoLBEPEN 5HR oCTI�L CONNECToas BB UPAPPLICABLEc TT R. HE ANDMEELE OFTHEEUD S THE APPROVAL LOCATAAGRANGNCESANDOURTACOESS CAREFULLYRR3 IT WRING EQUIPMENT AIAINEAAT ONER ooE O DRAv NOo°o°OCOEPT EEoFFOTHPER DNDI IDNSON THER PREPAREANDSDBMITDETaLEDDRA ANCE FIELON D ACCE ES RENOTNE RE WN AD L SUCH AS MAYBEREQUIREDTOFITTHE WDRKTO THE CONDITIONS 5 MAINTAIN ALL CLEARANCES AS RE.URED BY NEC READ I NGS WHEN SITE POWER 0 RIGINATES ° oOREA�NT oADAOTLOCAT�HE TWF tOECORA FAN LECTRIPS AVoaEP�oVAACA TO EoMP�FNU NGS(1AEC°�°sREo�RIES oLMARA�RE PULLCE SWTCHES SHALL BE CLASS RN CURRENT LINITING TYPE 200 11 C NON TITlEDElY DISCONNECT SWTCHESTO HAVE EFFECT ION CLIPS UNLESS INDICATED OTHEOWSE ELECTR CAL RDU PIAENT S. PROTE CT ON A SHALL BE STAN DID 'PC RATED IT G HER THAN NCO. NG EST P.ENT AND PC R UT IT T YCO 'PC RATE AN D Co NSIDER NG ELECTR C ATTORS FAULT CONTRIBUTION CONTRACTOR CTION UNTIL THIS MANDATORY REQUIREMENT IS MET IF PROPOSED LORD IS= rT DEC CRY GRC -TS eouNoomODRY TYPE u TRANSFORMER GROUNDINGELEC TRODE CONDUCTOR =IZ ED R G D COURT T TRANSFER SWTCH ��.EEaO,aE�Oao CTOR ERE BPEN AT NUILELF 0 DING,SHELTER THASIHCDNESE NTTDPREVENTMDISTUREPENETRATIDNINTD 7 SILICONE SIT AROUND ALL BOIS AND SCREWS USED TO SECURE E.UIPElENT TO CATERION OF BUILDING CONDUCTORS AND CONNECTORS NFYQCONFIRMBEFORECONSTRUCTIDNTHATTOTALITTIDTYGERVICEL�ADSHALLKEP 7 To MAX RE MAND.PROPOSEDLOAD),80 SERWCEENTRANCECDNDUCTDRTECT ON CAPAC TY WHICHEVER RATICG A FL0SWSEHALLLGHoT.NpG SHALL BEEF NEC IE AAAND, STANDARDS IF APPLIC ABLE PHOTOMETR LEVE L YWTHLOCAF STATE &FEDERAL RULES BE N STALLED N AY ALL FILE CT 2 CRT ElU P' ENT SHALL THE E LE CTRI ON Ly CE SS COMPANIES. ITATL BEEF ALL STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OF POWER AND TELE PHONE UTILITYN SD TGB SCHEDULESOPAC) SERMCED SOLID NEUTRAL TELCO GROUND BAD US -AK 1014 1 UNLESS NOTED O= ALL CONDUCTORSGTONESHALL BE WITH CO T�cYNFORMINGTo NEMAWW ORCROSSON SHALLBERATETHYLL-ENEINBuwTION NDOR SHALL BE COL EWITHNEC oRYCE THHN CcoRDANCIN ALlBERATED FOR90C TEGB TOWER EX T ND BAR voLTAceSURGE SUPPRESSOR SEWARD AVTEC 61BRD RD AR sEwARD,AK eeeea L BE COPPER AND SHALL HAVE GREEN ATION EXCEPT 2 ALL CONDUCTORS USED FOR GROUNDING ERE WORTYPECOPPER OPP RC PPG POWERPROTECTIONSHELTER GENERAL THAN ' A— U SE SOULDERLE SS DENT HEX A CREWoR B OFF T YPE PRESSURE CONNECTORS OR DOUBLE NOTES E-1 CoMPR SON SITYPE ACCEPTABLE IF SOL CES ARE UNAVoIDnBLE PRIOR ATERI PPROVAL FRo. THIT E ENGINEER MUST 69 COMMON VZW DCPLANT RECTIFIER REGU I REM ENTS LOAD CALCULATION RECTIFIER NPUTFLA CURRENT AT 2402 RECT/BRANCH CIRCUIT I RECT/BRANCH CIRCUIT LOAD AMPS VAC (EACH RECTIFIER) ALTERNATE APPROACH ALTERNATE APPROACH RTIV 351ow(R. 21-1 OR elm) 11 1 A. PE PPACOP (ORa 2V x9 THHN OR 5A(NEO]5ACae;x;x 0 R 8IM) pE"AX OTHER 111RD11VINDIR RIF ER TO OUT IHEETI REFER TO OUT EHEETE REFER TO OUT ETEETE DP°(.ATBE CI ANNIFACTUREID" OF SAND NBEATSX ORA�R) PROVIDE 200A METER (EMONDMON OR EOUAQ LABEL V11 ED ST NO MAIN D DUE BIT 30N4W a0 (SO-D L NE PAN ELBOARD m 2121210'Soo 10001) -� 2001 J'p � Li Li Li Li Li ENSTINGGIOIND TOEXISTING CnooAMAN SERVICE 2 CONDUIT (oPnCH oPATAM Lo TYPICAL) NOTE: ALL VZW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE RATED FOR 120/208V, 1 PH NDU �—�IET NDU ROUTE CO OVEOUT oELAosTo N FRAME w(uoELFouT Auw (e vP1L EE INSTALL 11VDUaRvTsusRiNciARwcEG FOR FUT(1RE RECTFERCU NOTES ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM BE L CHUN NG PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE PATH TIAG22 G AND VERISON WIRELESS STANDARDS 3 CONDUCTOR SIZES AND DISTANCES HAVE BEEN SIZED FOR 3% — VOLTAGE OP (TOTAL SYSTEM VOLTAGE DROP ON EXCEEDsn M RE T�MWUMT24 RADIUS ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE SUIT AD L�EUFSoT'FUNSEECE�STH.TIHYALLDCEDON'DGUDTCSHoANLDLUMTEEVTE'NIEFCYCSoTNATDEUITAND PANELSCHEDULE (1) 2. R (1) 2 CONDUIT DECG1Pnmelnom NO ROR DED) (1 elXll FIeEa EQUIPMENT CAGNET TELRO 'AG Eq CONNECTION' JA NEEDED FOR (DD 2, CO—T FOR E NET F OR NREBHI (OR�RI T0NEOXON MEFINcoMPOOND (ADE 'ALM NEEDED aF RROOiReoUE wlw (FOR eeHiENEEDEG vloEw TH FIBER SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM ADD(1) ADD ITIoNAL2 ComouIT FOR CAR UETER ¢ TOTAL) IF REQUIRED BY IFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (ADD 2STRINGS TO EACH PULL CONDUIT) VIDEDPRIORTOCONSTRUcnON. (AI o z PULL s° RlRROD To EACH co`Po o PRo 70 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Vei'Clcd vwiZon,/ EN�\/ECTOR US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC 516 TH I RD AVE ME—RD, AN 00664 ONE -LINE DIAGRAMS & PANEL SCHEDULE E-2 ILE ELEC BACKBOARD v ROOMMo OMON METER EXI MDP PANEL SDDA, oe v,CO 4CP AOUARE'' _ � � Ro OF (VIA ROxOFTo OOGHOU SE)AND ROUTE TO NEWEQUIPMENT TOP DOGHOUSE D x ouvcoxou� T oaL�cuusaavouxo coxoui. rsraL.Da or x° voD. ar.cv uvixo� covEov DDr coxouu PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION `� � =�O \ L R ROUTE � UP TO VZW 2➢0A ILC ON ROOF MECH ROOM :iuG m ELEC ROOM _ oEcu EaoxrsEwaxTavouxo acv METED or cox ouT x coxou TTxvu voDrixo mxTvxTDV TD avmno EPCDMPLETE pxsTauFo acv wEnTxEv noxTs vEcowwExowTioxs voor oEcu uvwurxTuvcvs EwsTixo Eaow voor xD. owTE w oawm vu eoxa co vcuicw 1%IITING PANE L'R1A' IX ST NO PANEL'Ri B' 3p2A e ` III _ avDDr rvae o rz vu curxT mwwExTs rz° vw cue°T mwwExTs °cm vw curxT mwwExTs ST NG PPNELu RAK PROPOSED VZCOM M M 303 -. cucxT. _ Y fftimi ELEC 1ST FLR PLAN 1 ® FIBER 3RD FLR PLAN 2 CONDUIT ROOF PENETRATION 13 v izm,/ NEW VAR SON C' RELE" �x��(�•��s�L,�N�.IN�7 200-P TO POFSER CAB NET FROM �o x�v Dr vECDvx CTOR UT HVERZONVNRELESS FRAME N-4 FIBER CONDUIT TO _� --- STNGROOFTOP DOGHOUSE �Hl - /lFO FACCAla/aF" _ - US-AK-1014 SEWARD, AVTEC Po - - - - - — SERVE css RUBBERooE TYv) EG DU EC ON PM RouTe TO NEw VERIFY sieTwRDAveRPoE SEPPARDAH R966PW/ MOUNTED ON EPLAY ROUT ONTHEF"EON ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E-3 °1 ELECTRICAL ROOF PLAN PLAN 4 GROUNDING PLAN - KEYED NOTES 0 a.E SFOD caoumD eAD nD EQuwMENT cnawETs. sEEDErAIL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION comsTDucnoN. 0 STEMECHANICGROUND AL 2 GDOANDF M EOUIPMENTGROUND BUS BADTO EXISTING BUILDING EL QVP. of z� ■ DAN 0 ANTENNAGIOUND BUS TRACTION AND UND IT SEE ou No DA, CoNS SFOR • EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION a PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS ANTENNA GROUNDING. RVP. oF3f B A \ 0 ORBALDNGSTEEDRM PACOF3/NA GROUND BUS DAD TO EQAPMENT GROUND BAR NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 RM AWG GROANDFDOMANTENNA MOANTNGPPE/RRH/OVR1-FRAMEPPCFIBER 1 / g BOX TO PNTENNP/EQU PMENT GROUND BAR, TVP. O B M6 AWG GROUND FROM GPS ANTENNA MOUNT TO EQUIPMENT GROUND BPR. � M6 AWG GROUND FROM E]UIPMENT CABINET TO EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR ,TVP. O _ O BADTVP U ND PRO M EQUIP MENTSUPPORT BEAMS TO EQUIPMENT GROUND / 5 B Y ertiml vwizow CTOR A -------- CADWELD GROUND CONNECTION DETAILS �I I 1 rPE.A naE �x naE xc naE ss — — — -- —--------- I����[�y\\¶� I���QIyIj�� • — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — US-AK-1014 SEWARD AVTEC Sis THIRD AVF sEwARD,AH eeeea LT_------------ 1-------_ ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN E-4 'Z ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN 1 I ;3"`':�= S0'T o=�LE NOT USED 121 NOT USED 111a2�', NNA AD E �E E u EAT" RPN CRT CEO, NO AT REENGTE' CABLE THWN oN(GROUNDEDTO GROUND BAR &2) EWE P°�NT)"�M owl LD (9D9 WELDS ALLOWED RE SOLD FARE T INNED COPPER GROUND NG NO SLAG OR DEFORMITIES UCToR CoND ALLOWED MINIMUM DECIDING R A Op Op —PER RESOLID BARE TIN NED C ORDER GROUNDING CONDUCTOR m .o TYP GRID CONNECTION IFL GAP RYPOF„ .D..D� EGROUND KIT TO ANTENNA CABLE 5 1;Zll,ll— PANEuwTENNAS a PER SECTOR-TUP) RRU IF PER SECTOR-TYR) BUMPERS FROM RRU S TO ANTENNAS D� CAST FROMoUPToRRU SDI ORELIMINARV DRAWINGS OCCUR D WELOCATIONAND INSTALLATION IN HOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e� QO FIELD2 FOR GROUND BOND TO STEEL ONLY NSEIT A TOOTH WASHEI BETWEEN °OOa CU LEAD TO GROUND Loop 2� FIELD VERIFY NOTES LUG AND STEEL COAT ALL SURFACES v, TH GOP, SHIELD E " GET S"RINAALL OUTSIBELUG CONNECTIONIyer"1 l�^� MAIN GROUND BAR DETAIL 1 14 vaAlum✓ ANTENNA C0NIULTING,IIC A aSSARUETUPMENT(T R ITS E.o.EEaD,aE�Dao CTOR DUSBARw,T"DDT,NDD TOF To_RDRD�EA�" TO ANTENNATOR ON MOUNT0RTO-R "E° o GRoU ND BAR VAR Fy EXACT LLAT ON A. 0 LOCATION AND IN IN a® US-AK-1014 GROUND wRE�I� _ SEWARDAVTEC ROOFTOP 516Z§N1 JDIN sEwA TINN �E� Rlelwo ED ST NG BUTD NG ROUND 2PLACES) THPOcoPPER cRING@EACS E-5 73 GROUNDING DIAGR REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license. It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated. In cases where FCC rules require the presentation, posting, or display of an FCC license, this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license. Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN:REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 5055 NORTH POINT PKWY, NP2NE NETWORK ENGINEERING ALPHARETTA, GA 30022 FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0003290673 Call Sign File Number WQJU651 0008587238 Radio Service WU - 700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-19-2019 11-19-2019 06-13-2029 11-21-2019 Market Number Channel Block Sub -Market Designator REA007 C 0 Market Name Alaska 1st Build -out Date 2nd Build -out Date 3rd Build -out Date 4th Build -out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations, whether exclusively or in combination with other services, the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast service or within the term of the license had the broadcast service not been provided, whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CFR §27.13(b). This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the CommissionOs rules. Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System (ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB Page 1 of 2 August 2021 74 Licensee Name: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: WQJU651 700 MHz Relicensed Area Information: Market Market Name File Number: 0008587238 Buildout Deadline Print Date: 11-21-2019 Buildout Notification Status FCC 601-MB August 2021 Page 2 of 2 75 Structural Calculations Acom Seward 516 3rd Ave Seward, AK 99664 DCI Job Number 20011-0462 March 24, 2021 %5P �1 I * . 49T--" PAUL D. ROGNESS (�'F'•, No. SE13924 Q� EXPIRES: 12/31 /21 Prepared for: Acorn Consulting, Inc. Scott Matteson 5200 SW Meadows Rd. Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 vvashingtog I Oregon I California I Texas I Alaska I Colorado I Montana MDO E n C. r n E E R S Project Subject rlrkh sl\ d w 10 00 `1 6\ Co ^ {'\(-J, 1:,A 5Npp.rf toCCrls 61_ --0,%14 :na."5 ` 3 :� �- k e i,."qt Project No. Z�uull-u-+(O Sheet No - Date By 1 C� 3/25/2021 Hazards by Location ATC Hazards by Location Search Information Address: 516 3rd Ave, Seward, AK 99664, USA Coordinates: 60.1073149,-149.4418478 Elevation: 89 ft Timestamp: 2021-03-26TO1:48:33.613Z Hazard Type: Seismic Reference ASCE7-10 Document: Risk Category: II Site Class: D MCER Horizontal Response Spectrum Sa(g) 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 5 10 15 Basic Parameters 89 ft If Waterfront r Firk Seward Map data 02021 Google Design Horizontal Response Spectrum Sa(g) 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Period (s) 0 5 10 15 Name Value Description SS 1.5 MCER ground motion (period=0.2s) St 0.716 MCER ground motion (period=1.Os) SMS 1.5 Site -modified spectral acceleration value SM1 1.074 Site -modified spectral acceleration value SDS 1 Numeric seismic design value at 0.2s SA SD1 0.716 Numeric seismic design value at 1.0s SA Additional Information Name Value Description SDC D Seismic design category Fa 1 Site amplification factor at 0.2s Fv 1.5 Site amplification factor at 1.0s Period (s) 78 hftps://hazards.atcouncii.org/#/seismic?lat=60.1073149&ing=-149.4418478&address=516 3rd Ave%2C Seward%2C AK 99664%2C USA 1/2 3/25/2021 ATC Hazards by Location CRg 1.095 Coefficient of risk (0.2s) CR1 1.024 Coefficient of risk (1.0s) PGA 0.5 MCEG peak ground acceleration FpGA 1 Site amplification factor at PGA PGAM 0.5 Site modified peak ground acceleration TL 16 Long -period transition period (s) SsRT 1.892 Probabilistic risk -targeted ground motion (0.2s) SsUH 1.728 Factored uniform -hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) SsD 1.5 Factored deterministic acceleration value (0.2s) S1 RT 0.899 Probabilistic risk -targeted ground motion (1.0s) S1 UH 0.878 Factored uniform -hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) S1 D 0.716 Factored deterministic acceleration value (1.0s) PGAd 0.5 Factored deterministic acceleration value (PGA) The results indicated here DO NOT reflect any state or local amendments to the values or any delineation lines made during the building code adoption process. Users should confirm any output obtained from this tool with the local Authority Having Jurisdiction before proceeding with design. Disclaimer Hazard loads are provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Design Web Services While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, ATC and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in the report should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals. ATC does not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the report provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use. Use of the output of this website does not imply approval by the governing building code bodies responsible for building code approval and interpretation for the building site described by latitude/longitude location in the report. 79 https://hazards.atcouncii.org/#/seismic?lat=60.1073149&ing=-149.4418478&address=516 3rd Ave%2C Seward%2C AK 99664%2C USA 2/2 MDOProject No. Sheet No. GnGina5 Z Project Date Subject L A6, 11l ,_. 4 By (C� f- IiJJ _U t - 0. 1 ziti �.tiS�,r,� vc1 f.j`f_ 1' .�-37 x .. 65. `�'' T// S F6 - �Ef S►'�I L �(vNiR_o6� +den.._ I'Z k/ L n LGctii+rrn �S WOW �rmr, I �Cx•r• Cv.pE+�c., n+► 1v+ C..� �r ,jr.4/eSw� 11 0,, rv.QLt = l.Co'4 I 3 �.! 1o ,� _ S' tC �trt5ro� J (a..PrCSsiu�1 I- Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 1 81 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 2 82 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 3 83 ASD Load combination for reactions = Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 -D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:47 AM Job Number Checced By E r1 G 4 n E E R 5 Model Name Detail Report: M2 Unity Check: ).i; a:•i,l: c d r, i1 Load Combination: LC 1C. 6- 16, iu •;b) ----------------- Input Data: Shape: W10X45 I Node: Member Type: Beam J Node: Length (ft); 315 1 Release: Material Type: Hat Rolled Steel J Release: Design Rule: Typical I Offset (in): Number of Internal Sections: 97 J Offset (in): Material Properties: Material: E (ksi): G (ksi): Nu: Shape Properties: d (in): bf(in); tf (in): t,,,(in): Iyy(in'): 1xr(in'): Design Properties: Lbr-y (ft): Lb,, (ft): L comp top (ft) Lcompbat A: Ltorctue (ft) Diagrams: No net uplift. A.ial Force i kips i A992 Therm. Coeff. (1e"F-'): 0.65 Ry: 29000 Density (k/ft'): 0.49 F„ (ksi): 11154 Fy(ksi): 50 Rt: 0.3 N3 N4 Fixed Fixed N/A N/A 1.1 65 1.1 10.1 Area (in'): 13.3 Sv(in'); 23.6 8.02 Zyy(in'); 20.3 rT(in): 2.18 0.62 Z,(in'); 54.9 J(in'): 1.51 0.35 Cv,,(l^ 1200 kM(in): 1.313 53.4 Wna(in')-. 19 kd.(in): 1.12 248 31.5 KY-y: 1 Max Defl Ratio: L/6814 31.5 Kt-t; 1 Max Defl Location: 14.766 31.5 y sway. No Span: 1 31.5 z sway: No 31.5 Function: Lateral Seismic DR: None 0at0ft 0.401 at 0 ft M2 -0.055 at 14.766 ft y Deflection (in) 0.23.8 at 31.5 y Shear Force kips I 0 N4 0.868 at 15.75 ft 0at0ft z Deflection i in } 0.509 at 21 ft -0.604 at 0 ft r SI,a: ar Force : k RISA-3D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 4 84 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 �!DCI Designer bgeyer 8:46:50 AM Job Number Checked By E n G I In E E R S Model Name Torsion ( kip-ft ) Axial Stress ( ksi ) AISC 15th (360-16): LRFD Code Check .f -1,877 at 7.875 ft z-z Moment ( kip-ft ] 6,178 at 14.438 ft Bending Compression Stress i ksi ; 6.413 at 14,438 ft y-y Moment ( kip-ft) 6178 at 14.438 ft Bending Tension Stress ( ksi ) Limit State Required Available Unity Check Result Applied Loading - Bending/Axial Applied Loading - Shear + Torsion - - - Axial Tension Analysis 0.000 k 598.5 k - Axial Compression Analysis 0,000 k 84.43 k - Flexural Analysis (Strong Axis) 1.634 k-ft 123.674 k-ft - Flexural Analysis (Weak Axis) 6.413 k-ft 76.125 k-ft - - Shear Analysis (Major Axis y) OA01 k 10&05 k 0.004 Pass Shear Analysis (Minor Axis z) 0.604 k 268.51 k 0,002 Pass Bending & Axial Interaction Check (UC Bending Max) - - 0.097 Pass RISA-3D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 5 85 Company D C Designer - Job Number E r1 G I n E E R 5 Model Name <Licensed CompaI bgeyer 3/26/2021 8:58:00 AM Checked By Detail Report: M2 Llnity Check:.').w,,r; ;LC 21 Load Combination:=ruNlnpe AY Input Data: Shape- W10X45 I Node: r z Member Type: Beam J Node: N4 Length (ft): 31.5 1 Release: Fixed Material Type: Hot Rolled Steel J Release: Fixed i I Design Rule: Typical I offset (in): NIA Number of Internal Sections: 97 J Offset (in): N/A Material Properties: Material: A992 Therm. Coeff. (1es°F-'): 0.65 Ry: M E (ksi): 29000 Density (k/ft'): 0.49 F� (ksi): 65 G(ksi}: 11154 Fy(ksi); 50 1 11 Nu: 0.3 Shape Properties: d (in): 10.1 Area (irI 133 S,,M (in`): 23.6 I(in): 8.02 zyy(in'); 20.3 rT(in)-. 2.18 tf(in): 0.62 2u(in;): 54.9 J(irI 1.51 tw(in): 0.35 Cw(irI 1200 kdeL(in): 1.313 lyy (in'): 53.4 W a (in'): 19 kdes (in): 1.12 In (in"): 248 Design Properties: Le y-y (ft): 31-5 Kr-y: 1 Max I Ratio: L/265 I z-z (ft): 31,5 Ki-z; 1 Max I Location: 15.75 Lcomp top (ft): 31.5 y sway: No Span: 1 Lcomp hot (ft): 3-1 z sway. No Lsorque (ft): 31-5 Function: Lateral Seismic DR: None M2 Diagrams: 0 at 0 ft 1.24 at 15.75 ft 1.424 at 1535 ft -1.24 at 15.75 ft y Deflection (in) z Deflection ( in j Axial Force ( kips ) 4.59 at 0 ft :0.862 at 0 ft -4.24 at 31.5 ft -0.862 at 0 ft y Shear Force ( kips } x Shear Force ( kips } RISA-3D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 6 86 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 �!DCI Designer bgeyer 8:58:03 AM Job Number Checked By E n G I n E E R S Model Name Torsion ( kip-ft 1 Axial Stress ; ksi ) AISC 15th (360-16). LRFD Code Check Limit State Applied Loading - Bending/Axial Applied Loading - Shear + Torsion Axial Tension Analysis Axial Compression Analysis Flexural Analysis (Strong Axis) Flexural Analysis (Weak Axis) Shear Analysis (Major Axis y) Shear Analysis (Minor Axis z) Bending & Axial Interaction Check (UC Bending Max) -48,396 at 14.438 ft z-z Moment ; kip-ft ) 11.826 at 14.438 ft -11.826 at 14,438 ft Bending Strong Stress ( ksi ) 9.161 at 14.438 ft 9.161 at 14.438 ft y-y Moment ( kip-ft ) 8.256 at 14.438 ft -8,256 at 14,438 ft Bending Weak Stress i ksi } Gov. LC Required Available Unity Check Result 2 - - - - 2 - - 2 0.000 k 598.5 k - 2 0.000 k 84.43 k - - 2 48.396 k-ft 128,988 k-ft - - 2 9.161 k-ft 76.125 k-ft - - 2 4.59 k 106.05 k 0.043 Pass 2 0.862 k 268.51 k 0.003 Pass 2 - - 0.496 Pass RISA-3D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 7 87 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Node Coordinates I ahel X rffl Y rffl 7 rffl Detach From Dianhranm 1 N1 0 0 0 2 N2 31.5 0 0 3 N3 0 0 4.5 4 N4 31.5 0 4.5 5 N5 0 0 10 6 N6 15 0 10 71 N7 4.5 0 14.5 81 N8 10.5 0 14.5 Hot Rolled Steel Properties I ahel F rksil G rksil Nu Therm Cneff rip5°F-11 Density rk/ff31 Yield rksil Rv Ft, rksil Rt 1 A992 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 50 1.1 65 1.1 2 A36 Gr.36 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 36 1.5 58 1.2 3 A572 Gr.50 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 50 1.1 65 1.1 4 A500 Gr.B RND 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.527 42 1.4 58 1.3 5 A500 Gr.B Rect 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.527 46 1.4 58 1.3 6 A53 Gr.B 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 35 1.6 60 1.2 71 Al085 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 50 1.25 65 1.15 81 A913 Gr.65 29000 11154 0.3 0.65 0.49 65 1.1 80 1.1 Member Primary Data I ahel I Node J Node Section/Shane Tvne De -inn I ist Material De -inn Rule 1 M1 N1 N2 W1OX45 Beam Wide Flange A992 Typical 2 M2 N3 N4 W1OX45 Beam Wide Flange A992 Typical 3 M3 N5 N6 W8X15 Beam Wide Flange A992 Typical 4 M4 N7 N8 W8X15 Beam Wide Flange A992 T ical Member Point Loads (BLC 1 : D) Member Label Direction Magnitude rk k-ftl Location r(ft %)1 1 M 1 Y -0.13 2.33 2 M 1 Y -0.25 7.75 3 M 1 Y -0.7 11.5 4 M 1 Y -0.7 14.33 5 M 1 Y -0.7 17.67 6 M 1 Y -0.7 20.83 7 M2 Y -0.13 0.1 8 M2 Y -0.13 5.33 9 M2 Y -0.25 7.75 10 M2 Y -0.7 11.5 11 M2 Y -0.7 14.33 12 M2 Y -0.7 17.67 13 M2 Y -0.7 20.83 14 M 3 Y -0.13 7.5 15 M 4 Y -0.13 0.25 16 M 4 Y -0.13 5.75 Member Point Loads (BLC 2: EQz) Member I ahel Direction Magnitude rk k-ffl I ovation r(ff %11 1 M 1 z -0.062 2.33 2 M 1 z -0.12 7.75 3 M 1 z -0.336 11.5 4 M 1 z -0.336 14.33 5 M 1 z -0.336 17.67 6 M 1 z -0.336 20.83 7 M2 z -0.062 0.1 8 M2 z -0.062 5.33 RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 8 88 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Member Point Loads (BLC 2: EQz) (Continued) Memher I ahel Direction Mannitude rk k-ffl I ovation r(ff %11 9 M2 Z -0.12 7.75 10 M2 Z -0.336 11.5 11 M2 Z -0.336 14.33 12 M2 Z -0.336 17.67 13 M2 Z -0.336 20.83 14 M 3 Z -0.062 7.5 15 M 4 Z -0.062 0.25 16 M 4 Z -0.062 5.75 17 M 1 Y 0 2.33 18 M 1 Y 0 7.75 19 M1 Y 0.55 11.5 20 M 1 Y 0.55 14.33 21 M 1 Y 0.55 17.67 22 M 1 Y 0.55 20.83 23 M2 Y 0 0.1 24 M2 Y 0 5.33 25 M2 Y 0 7.75 26 M2 Y -0.55 11.5 27 M2 Y -0.55 14.33 28 M2 Y -0.55 17.67 29 M2 Y -0.55 20.83 30 M3 Y 0 7.5 31 M 4 Y 0 0.25 32 M 4 Y 0 5.75 Node Reactions LC Node Label X rkl Y rkl Z rkl MX rk-ftl MY rk-ftl MZ rk-ftl 1 1 N2 0 3.099 0 0 0 0 2 1 N 1 0 3.349 0 0 0 0 3 1 N3 0 3.513 0 0 0 0 4 1 N4 0 3.117 0 0 0 0 5 1 N5 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 6 1 N6 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 7 1 N 7 0 0.245 0 0 0 0 8 1 N 8 0 0.245 0 0 0 0 9 1 Totals: 0 14.068 0 10 1 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 2.982 11 2 N2 0 1.976 0.72 0 0 0 12 2 N 1 0 2.272 0.806 0 0 0 13 2 N3 0 4.59 0.862 0 0 0 14 2 N4 0 4.24 0.726 0 0 0 15 2 N5 0 0.25 0.031 0 0 0 16 2 N6 0 0.25 0.031 0 0 0 17 2 N 7 0 0.245 0.062 0 0 0 18 2 N 8 0 0.245 0.062 0 0 0 19 2 Totals: 0 14.068 3.302 20 2 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 3.685 21 3 N2 0 0.426 0.72 0 0 0 22 3 N 1 0 0.598 0.806 0 0 0 23 3 N3 0 2.833 0.862 0 0 0 24 3 N4 0 2.682 0.726 0 0 0 25 3 N5 0 0.125 0.031 0 0 0 26 3 N6 0 0.125 0.031 0 0 0 27 3 N7 0 0.123 0.062 0 0 0 28 3 N8 0 0.123 0.062 0 0 0 29 3 Totals: 0 7.034 3.302 30 3 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 4.389 31 4 N2 0 2.213 0 0 0 0 RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 9 89 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Node Reactions (Continued) LC Node Label X [kj Y [kj Z [kj MX [k-ftj MY [k-ftj MZ [k-ftj 321 4 1 N 1 0 2.392 0 0 0 0 33 4 N3 0 2.509 0 0 0 0 34 4 N4 0 2.226 0 0 0 0 35 4 N5 0 0.178 0 0 0 0 36 4 N6 0 0.178 0 0 0 0 37 4 N7 0 0.175 0 0 0 0 38 4 N8 0 0.175 0 0 0 0 39 4 Totals: 0 10.048 0 40 4 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 2.982 41 5 N2 0 4.222 -0.72 0 0 0 42 5 N 1 0 4.426 -0.806 0 0 0 43 5 N3 0 2.436 -0.862 0 0 0 44 5 N4 0 1.994 -0.726 0 0 0 45 5 N5 0 0.25 -0.031 0 0 0 46 5 N6 0 0.25 -0.031 0 0 0 47 5 N7 0 0.245 -0.062 0 0 0 48 5 N8 0 0.245 -0.062 0 0 0 49 5 Totals: 0 14.068 -3.302 50 5 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 2.278 51 6 N2 0 2.673 -0.72 0 0 0 52 6 N 1 0 2.751 -0.806 0 0 0 53 6 N3 0 0.68 -0.862 0 0 0 54 6 N4 0 0.435 -0.726 0 0 0 55 6 N5 0 0.125 -0.031 0 0 0 56 6 N6 0 0.125 -0.031 0 0 0 57 6 N7 0 0.123 -0.062 0 0 0 58 6 N8 0 0.123 -0.062 0 0 0 59 6 Totals: 0 7.034 -3.302 60 6 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 1.574 61 7 N2 0 1.737 0.504 0 0 0 62 7 N 1 0 1.973 0.564 0 0 0 63 7 N3 0 3.614 0.604 0 0 0 64 7 N4 0 3.324 0.509 0 0 0 65 7 N5 0 0.203 0.022 0 0 0 66 7 N6 0 0.203 0.022 0 0 0 67 7 N7 0 0.2 0.044 0 0 0 68 7 N8 0 0.2 0.044 0 0 0 69 7 Totals: 0 11.455 2.312 70 7 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 3.587 71 8 N2 0 3.31 -0.504 0 0 0 72 8 N 1 0 3.481 -0.564 0 0 0 73 8 N3 0 2.107 -0.604 0 0 0 74 8 N4 0 1.752 -0.509 0 0 0 75 8 N5 0 0.203 -0.022 0 0 0 76 8 N6 0 0.203 -0.022 0 0 0 77 8 N7 0 0.2 -0.044 0 0 0 78 8 N8 0 0.2 -0.044 0 0 0 79 8 Totals: 0 11.455 -2.312 80 8 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 2.377 81 9 N2 0 0.232 0.504 0 0 0 82 9 N 1 0 0.347 0.564 0 0 0 83 9 N3 0 1.908 0.604 0 0 0 84 9 N4 0 1.81 0.509 0 0 0 85 9 N5 0 0.082 0.022 0 0 0 86 9 N6 0 0.082 0.022 0 0 0 87 9 N7 0 0.081 0.044 0 0 0 88 9 N8 0 0.081 0.044 0 0 0 89 9 Totals: 0 4.622 2.312 RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 10 90 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Node Reactions (Continued) LC Node Label X [kj Y [kj Z [kj MX [k-ftj MY [k-ftj MZ [k-ftj 901 9 1 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 4.481 91 10 N2 0 1.804 -0.504 0 0 0 92 10 N 1 0 1.854 -0.564 0 0 0 93 10 N3 0 0.401 -0.604 0 0 0 94 10 N4 0 0.238 -0.509 0 0 0 95 10 N5 0 0.082 -0.022 0 0 0 96 10 N6 0 0.082 -0.022 0 0 0 97 10 N7 0 0.081 -0.044 0 0 0 98 10 N8 0 0.081 -0.044 0 0 0 99 10 Totals: 0 4.622 -2.312 100 10 COG ft: X: 14.446 Y: 0 Z: 1.482 Maximum Member Section Forces LC Member Label Axial[kjLoc[ftjy Shear[kjLoc[ftjz Shear[kjLoc[ftjTorque[k-ftjLoc[ftjy-V Moment[k-ftjLoc[ftjz-z Moment[k-ftjLoc[ftj 1 1 1 M 1 max 0 31.5 3.349 0 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 2 min 0 0 -3.099 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 -34.219 14.438 3 1 M2 max 0 31.5 3.513 0 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 4 min 0 0 -3.117 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 -34.525 14.438 5 1 M3 max 0 15 0.25 0 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 6 min 0 0 -0.25 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1.277 7.5 7 1 M4 max 0 6 0.245 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 8 min 0 0 -0.245 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.141 3 9 2 M 1 max 0 31.5 2.272 0 0.806 2.297 0 31.5 9.057 14.438 0 31.5 10 min 0 0 -1.976 31.5 -0.72 21 0 0 0 0 -20.348 14.438 11 2 M2 max 0 31.5 4.59 0 0.862 0 0 31.5 9.161 14.438 0 31.5 12 min 0 0 -4.24 31.5 -0.726 21 0 0 0 0 -48.396 14.438 13 2 M3 max 0 15 0.25 0 0.031 7.344 0 15 0.234 7.5 0 15 14 min 0 0 -0.25 15 -0.031 7.5 0 0 0 0 -1.277 7.5 15 2 M4 max 0 6 0.245 0 0.062 0.188 0 6 0.016 2.688 0 6 16 min 0 0 -0.245 6 -0.062 5.75 0 0 0 0 -0.141 3 17 3 M 1 max 0 31.5 0.598 0 0.806 2.297 0 31.5 9.057 14.438 0 31.5 18 min 0 0 -0.426 31.5 -0.72 21 0 0 0 0 -3.305 10.5 19 3 M2 max 0 31.5 2.833 0 0.862 0 0 31.5 9.161 14.438 0 31.5 20 min 0 0 -2.682 31.5 -0.726 21 0 0 0 0 -31.134 14.438 21 3 M3 max 0 15 0.125 0 0.031 7.344 0 15 0.234 7.5 0 15 22 min 0 0 -0.125 15 -0.031 7.5 0 0 0 0 -0.639 7.5 23 3 M4 max 0 6 0.123 0 0.062 0.188 0 6 0.016 2.688 0 6 24 min 0 0 -0.123 6 -0.062 5.75 0 0 0 0 -0.07 3 25 4 M 1 max 0 31.5 2.392 0 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 26 min 0 0 -2.213 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 -24.442 14.438 27 4 M2 max 0 31.5 2.509 0 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 28 min 0 0 -2.226 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 -24.66 14.438 29 4 M3 max 0 15 0.178 0 0 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 30 min 0 0 -0.178 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.912 7.5 31 4 M4 max 0 6 0.175 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 32 min 0 0 -0.175 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.1 3 33 5 M 1 max 0 31.5 4.426 0 0.72 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 34 min 0 0 -4.222 31.5 -0.806 0 0 0 -9.057 14.438 -48.09 14.438 35 5 M2 max 0 31.5 2.436 0 0.726 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.51 0 31.5 36 min 0 0 -1.994 31.5 -0.862 0 0 0 -9.161 14.438 -20.653 14.438 37 5 M3 max 0 15 0.25 0 0.031 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 38 min 0 0 -0.25 15 -0.031 0 0 0 -0.234 7.5 -1.277 7.5 39 5 M4 max 0 6 0.245 0 0.062 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 40 min 0 0 -0.245 6 -0.062 0 0 0 -0.016 2.688 -0.141 3 41 6 M 1 ma 0 31.5 2.751 0 0.72 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 42 min 0 0 -2.673 31.5 -0.806 0 0 0 -9.057 14.438 -30.981 14.438 43 6 M2 ma 0 31.5 0.68 0 0.726 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 44 min 0 0 -0.435 31.5 -0.862 0 0 0 -9.161 14.438 -3.494 10.172 RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 11 91 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Maximum Member Section Forces (Continued) LC Member Label Axial[k]Loc[ft]y Shear[k]Loc[ft]z Shear[k]Loc[ft]Torque[k-ft]Loc[ft]y-y Moment[k-ft]Loc[ft]z-z Moment[k-ft]Loc[ft] 451 6 M3 max 0 15 0.125 0 0.031 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 46 min 0 0 -0.125 15 -0.031 0 0 0 -0.234 7.5 -0.639 7.5 47 6 M4 max 0 6 0.123 0 0.062 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 48 min 0 0 -0.123 6 -0.062 0 0 0 -0.016 2.688 -0.07 3 49 7 M 1 max 0 31.5 1.973 0 0.564 2.297 0 31.5 6.34 14.438 0 31.5 50 min 0 0 -1.737 31.5 -0.504 21 0 0 0 0 -18.154 14.438 51 7 M2 max 0 31.5 3.614 0 0.604 0 0 31.5 6.413 14.438 0 31.5 52 min 0 0 -3.324 31.5 -0.509 21 0 0 0 0 -37.823 14.438 53 7 M3 max 0 15 0.203 0 0.022 7.344 0 15 0.164 7.5 0 15 54 min 0 0 -0.203 15 -0.022 7.5 0 0 0 0 -1.04 7.5 55 7 M4 max 0 6 0.2 0 0.044 0.188 0 6 0.011 0.75 0 6 56 min 0 0 -0.2 6 -0.044 5.75 0 0 0 0 -0.115 3 57 8 M 1 max 0 31.5 3.481 0 0.504 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 58 min 0 0 -3.31 31.5 -0.564 0 0 0 -6.34 14.438 -37.574 14.438 59 8 M2 max 0 31.5 2.107 0 0.509 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 60 min 0 0 -1.752 31.5 -0.604 0 0 0 -6.413 14.438 -18.403 14.438 61 8 M3 max 0 15 0.203 0 0.022 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 62 min 0 0 -0.203 15 -0.022 0 0 0 -0.164 7.5 -1.04 7.5 63 8 M4 max 0 6 0.2 0 0.044 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 64 min 0 0 -0.2 6 -0.044 0 0 0 -0.011 0.313 -0.115 3 65 9 M 1 max 0 31.5 0.347 0 0.564 2.297 0 31.5 6.34 14.438 0 31.5 66 min 0 0 -0.232 31.5 -0.504 21 0 0 0 0 -1.74 8.203 67 9 M2 max 0 31.5 1.908 0 0.604 0 0 31.5 6.413 14.438 0 31.5 68 min 0 0 -1.81 31.5 -0.509 21 0 0 0 0 -21.054 14.438 69 9 M3 max 0 15 0.082 0 0.022 7.344 0 15 0.164 7.5 0 15 70 min 0 0 -0.082 15 -0.022 7.5 0 0 0 0 -0.42 7.5 71 9 M4 max 0 6 0.081 0 0.044 0.188 0 6 0.011 0.75 0 6 72 min 0 0 -0.081 6 -0.044 5.75 0 0 0 0 -0.046 3 73 10 M 1 max 0 31.5 1.854 0 0.504 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 74 min 0 0 -1.804 31.5 -0.564 0 0 0 -6.34 14.438 -20.953 14.438 75,10 M2 max 0 31.5 0.401 0 0.509 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 0 31.5 76 min 0 0 -0.238 31.5 -0.604 0 0 0 -6.413 14.438 -1.877 7.875 77 10 M3 max 0 15 0.082 0 0.022 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 78 min 0 0 -0.082 15 -0.022 0 0 0 -0.164 7.5 -0.42 7.5 79 10 M4 max 0 6 0.081 0 0.044 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 80 min 0 0 -0.081 6 -0.044 0 0 0 -0.011 0.313 -0.046 3 Beam Deflections LC Member Label Span Location [ft] y' [in] (n) L'/y' Ratio 1 1 M 1 1 15.75 -1.013 373 2 1 M2 1 15.75 -1.023 369 3 1 M3 1 7.5 -0.041 4338 4 1 M4 1 6 0 NC 5 2 M1 1 15.75 -0.612 618 6 2 M2 1 15.75 -1.424 265 7 2 M3 1 7.5 -0.041 4338 8 2 M4 1 6 0 NC 9 3 M 1 1 15.094 -0.105 3583 10 3 M2 1 15.75 -0.912 414 11 3 M3 1 7.5 -0.021 8676 12 3 M4 1 6 0 NC 13 4 M 1 1 15.75 -0.723 522 14 4 M2 1 15.75 -0.73 517 15 4 M3 1 7.5 -0.03 6073 16 4 M4 1 6 0 NC 17 5 M 1 1 15.75 -1.414 267 18 5 M2 1 15.75 -0.622 608 19 5 M3 1 7.5 -0.041 4338 RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 12 92 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name Beam Deflections (Continued) I C Memher I ahel S n a n I oration rffl v' rinl (n) I '/v' Ratio 20 5 M4 1 6 0 NC 21 6 M 1 1 15.75 -0.907 416 22 6 M2 1 15.094 -0.11 3421 23 6 M3 1 7.5 -0.021 8676 24 6 M4 1 6 0 NC 25 7 M 1 1 15.75 -0.544 694 26 7 M2 1 15.75 -1.113 339 27 7 M3 1 7.5 -0.034 5327 28 7 M4 1 6 0 NC 29 8 M 1 1 15.75 -1.105 342 30 8 M2 1 15.75 -0.552 684 31 8 M3 1 7.5 -0.034 5327 32 8 M4 1 6 0 NC 33 9 M 1 1 15.094 -0.052 7243 34 9 M2 1 15.75 -0.617 613 35 9 M3 1 15 0 NC 36 9 M4 1 6 0 NC 37 10 M 1 1 15.75 -0.613 616 38 10 M2 1 14.766 -0.055 6814 39 10 M3 1 15 0 NC 40 10 M4 1 6 0 NC A/SC 15TH (360-16): LRFD Member Steel Code Checks I C Memher Shane LJC Max I nrrffl Shear LJC I nrrffl nir nhi*Pnrrklnhi*Pntrkl nhi*Mnvvrk-ffl nhi*Mn77rk-ffl Ch Fan 1 1 M1 W1 OX45 0.267 14.438 0.032 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.163 1.191 H1-1b 2 1 M2 W1 OX45 0.27 14.438 0.033 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.031 1.189 H 1-1 b 3 1 M3 W8X15 0.057 7.5 0.004 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 4 1 M4 W8X15 0.003 3 0.004 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 5 2 M1 W1 OX45 0.28 14.438 0.021 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 126.025 1.171 H1-1b 6 2 M2 W1 OX45 0.496 14.438 0.043 0 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.988 1.198 H 1-1 b 7 2 M3 W8X15 0.08 7.5 0.004 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 8 2 M4 W8X15 0.005 3 0.004 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 9 3 M1 W1 OX45 0.146 14.438 0.006 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 117.673 1.093 H1-1b 10 3 M2 W1 OX45 0.361 14.438 0.027 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 129.526 1.203 H 1-1 b 11 3 M3 W8X15 0.052 7.5 0.002 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 12 3 M4 W8X15 0.003 3 0.002 6 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 13 4 M1 W1 OX45 0.191 14.438 0.023 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.163 1.191 H1-1b 14 4 M2 W1 OX45 0.193 14.438 0.024 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.031 1.189 H 1-1 b 15 4 M3 W8X15 0.041 7.5 0.003 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 16 4 M4 W8X15 0.002 3 0.003 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 17 5 M1 W1 OX45 0.492 14.438 0.042 0 84.43 598.5 76.125 129.091 1.199 H1-1b 18 5 M2 W1 OX45 0.284 14.438 0.023 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 125.841 1.169 H 1-1 b 19 5 M3 W8X15 0.08 7.5 0.004 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 20 5 M4 W8X15 0.005 3 0.004 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 21 6 M1 W1 OX45 0.358 14.438 0.026 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 129.608 1.204 H1-1b 22 6 M2 W1 OX45 0.149 14.438 0.006 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 118.514 1.101 H 1-1 b 23 6 M3 W8X15 0.052 7.5 0.002 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 24 6 M4 W8X15 0.003 3 0.002 6 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 25 7 M1 W1 OX45 0.227 14.438 0.019 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 126.479 1.175 H1-1b 26 7 M2 W1 OX45 0.378 14.438 0.034 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.888 1.197 H 1-1 b 27 7 M3 W8X15 0.063 7.5 0.003 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 28 7 M4 W8X15 0.004 3 0.003 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 29 8 M1 W1 OX45 0.375 14.438 0.033 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 128.993 1.198 H1-1b 30 8 M2 W1 OX45 0.23 14.438 0.02 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 126.304 1.173 H 1-1 b 31 8 M3 W8X15 0.063 7.5 0.003 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 32 8 M4 W8X15 0.004 3 0.003 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 33 9 M1 W1 OX45 0.096 14.438 0.003 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 122.215 1.135 H1-1b 34 9 M2 W1 OX45 0.247 14.438 0.018 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 129.579 1.204 H 1-1 b RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 13 93 Company <Licensed Company> 3/26/2021 D C Designer bgeyer 8:46:41 AM - Job Number Checked By E fl G i n E E R 5 Model Name A/SC 15TH (360-16): LRFD Member Steel Code Checks (Continued) LC Member Shape LIC Max Loc[ftj Shear LIC Loc[ftj Dir phi*Pnc[kj phi*Pnt[kj phi*Mnyy[k-ftj phi*Mnzz[k-ftj Cb Eqn 351 9 1 M3 W8X15 0.035 7.5 0.001 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 36 9 M4 W8X15 0.002 3 0.001 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b 37 10 M1 W1OX45 0.245 14.438 0.017 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 129.659 1.204 H1-1b 38 10 M2 W1 OX45 0.097 14.438 0.004 0 y 84.43 598.5 76.125 123.674 1.149 H 1-1 b 39 10 M3 W8X15 0.035 7.5 0.001 15 y 23.777 199.8 10.013 22.489 1.226 H1-1b 40 10 M4 W8X15 0.002 3 0.001 6 y 121.971 199.8 10.013 46.441 1.088 H 1-1 b RISA-31D Version 19 [ Beams over Site Built Portion - bg 3-17-2... Page 14 94 it r O R T G' =I MEMBER REPOR' PASSED Level, Floor: Drop Beam 1 piece(s) 5 1/8" x 18" 24F-V4 DF Glulam Overall Length: 23' 10' 22,101, YI All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end). All dimensions are horizontal. ❑2 Design Results Actual @ Location Allowed Result LDF Load: Combination (Pattern) Member Reaction (Ibs) 9167 @ 4 1/2" 19988 (6.00") Passed (46%) 1.0 D + 1.0 S (All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 8242 @ 2' 18742 Passed (44%) 1.15 1.0 D + 1.0 S (All Spans) Pos Moment (Ft-Ibs) 37880 @ 11' 5 1/8" 60548 Passed (63%) 1.15 1.0 D + 1.0 S (All Spans) Live Load Defl. (in) 0.489 @ 11' 11" 0.769 Passed (L/566) 1.0 D + 1.0 S (All Spans) Total Load Defl. (in) 0.821 @ 11' 9 1/4" 1.154 Passed (L/337) 1.0 D + 1.0 S (All Spans) • Deflection criteria: LL (L/360) and TL (L/240). • Allowed moment does not reflect the adjustment for the beam stability factor. • Critical positive moment adjusted by a volume factor of 0.95 that was calculated using length L = 23' 1". • The effects of positive or negative camber have not been accounted for when calculating deflection. • The specified glulam is assumed to have its strong laminations at the bottom of the beam. Install with proper side up as indicated by the manufacturer. • Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Supports Bearing Length Loads to Supports (Ibs) Accessories Total Available Required Dead Snow Total 1 - Column - SPF 6.00" 6.00" 2.75" 5158 4009 9167 Blocking 2 - Column - SPF 6.00" 6.00" 1 1.91" 2362 3998 6360 Blocking • blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loacis applleo directly above them and the toll load Is applleo to the member being designed. Lateral Bracing Bracing Intervals Comments Top Edge (Lu) 23' 10" o/c Bottom Edge (Lu) 23' 10" o/c -Maximum allowable bracing intervals based on applied load. Vertical Loads Location (Side) Tributary Width Dead (0.90) Snow (1.15) Comments 0 - Self Weight (PLF) 0 to 23' 10" N/A 22.4 1 - Uniform (PSF) 3" to 23' 7" (Front) 10' 6" 15.0 31.5 Default Load 2 - Uniform (PLF) 0 to 23' (Front) N/A - 12.6 3 - Point (Ib) 2' 2" (Front) N/A 3310 System : Floor Member Type : Drop Beam Building Use : Residential Building Code : IBC 2018 Design Methodology : ASD Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project. Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third -party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC-ES under evaluation reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and installation details refer to www.weyerhaeuser.com/woodproducts/document-library. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support information have been provided by ForteWEB Software Operator ForteWEB Software Operator Job Notes Brad Geyer DCI Engineers (206) 787-8935 95 bgeyer@dci-engineers.com 3/18/2021 6:34:08 PM UTC ForteWEB v3.1, Engine: V8.1.6.2, Data: V8.0.1.0 Weyerhaeuser File Name: North beams Page 1 / 1 it r O R T G' =I MEMBER REPOR' PASSED Level, Wall: Stud 1 piece(s) 2 x 12 Douglas Fir -Larch No. 1 @ 12" OC Drawing is Conceptual Wall Height: 10' 1" Member Height: 9' 8 1/2" 0. C. Spacing: 12.00" Design Results Actual Allowed Result LDF Load: Combination Slenderness 10 50 Passed (21%) Compression (Ibs) 3468 21249 Passed (16%) 0.90 1.0 D Plate Bearing (Ibs) 3811 13184 Passed (29%) 1.0 D + 1.0 S Lateral Reaction (Ibs) 0 N/A Lateral Shear (Ibs) 0 N/A Passed (N/A) N/A Lateral Moment (ft-Ibs) 0 @ mid -span N/A Passed (N/A) N/A Total Deflection (in) 0.02 @ mid -span 0.97 Passed (L/5666) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 S Bending/Compression 0.24 1 Passed (24%) 0.90 1.0 D • Lateral deflection criteria: Wind (L/120) • Input axial load eccentricity for this design is 16.67% of applicable member side dimension. • Applicable calculations are based on NDS. • A bearing area factor of 1.25 has been applied to base plate bearing capacity. • A 15% increase in the moment capacity has been added to account for repetitive member usage. • Special detailing and installation procedures are necessary for large wall construction. Supports Type Material Top Dbl 2X Douglas Fir -Larch Base 2X Douglas Fir -Larch Max Unbraced Length Comments 1' Vertical Loads Spacing Dead (0.90) Floor Live (1.00) Snow (1.15) Comments 1 - Point (PLF) 12.00" 157.5 80.0 343.4 Default Load 2 - Point (lb) N/A 3310 - - System : Wall Member Type : Stud Building Code : IBC 2018 Design Methodology : ASD Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project. Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third -party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC-ES under evaluation reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and installation details refer to www.weyerhaeuser.com/woodproducts/document-library. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support information have been provided by ForteWEB Software Operator ForteWEB Software Operator Job Notes Brad Geyer DCI Engineers (206) 787-8935 96 bgeyer@dci-engineers.com 3/18/2021 6:45:01 PM UTC AForteWEB v3.1, Engine: V8.1.6.2, Data: V8.0.1.0 Weyerhaeuser File Name: North beams Page 1 / 1 PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION HATCH W/GUARDRAIL EOUI PIAENT(TOP) EQUIPMENT RI�R PRO PO SED VERIZON WI RELES S RooBEAMS (TIP OFFTOP 2) i cuE 31T�, 8 ivertiml 'O )4 /� \ % PROFOSEDVENETS WIRELESS IXSTING BUILDNG ROOFTOP — ROOFTOP CANNETS FIT 3/4" (1) INSTALLED (i)FuiuRE PRO PO SED VAR SON WI RE LESS ROOFTOP EOU PMENT SUPPORT EXISTING BULDNG ROOFTOP ` BEAMSR,POF2) ywlZph✓ 4" Via° KD VER TDN (•> „-, oP adz WIRELESS SUPPORT BEAMS(rYPDFL) IT(WORwNG CLEARANCETD BEMAINTAINED) PRO POSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPO ROOFTOP P CABLE TRAY LMOUNTED TO DDAIITOANDFIBERCABINE, S RSW,RUBBARMArR P, CTOR PROPO ANTEROOFDANTo�ARYEQUIPMENT 2785 Ibs CUBE U S-A K-1014 SEWARD AVTEC (1)Tripod =174 b ME-RD RAeeeea (2) Antenna + Mounting Kit = 130 lb Assume 500 lb Seismic load: (2) OVP = 64 lb Rp = 1.5 ap = 1.0 PROPOSED Total = 370 lb Sds = 1.2 ROOF PLAN Fp = 0.288wp Use 390 Ibs / 3 mounting points = 130/point W10x39 at north end A-2 97 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1 CUBE BBU cabinets are ideally suited for cell sites and other outdoor environments when a large amount of battery backup is required. Multiple BBU cabinets can be combined to achieve an even greater amount of battery backup time. BBU cabinets can be installed adjacent to or remotely from other CUBE Macro Cell cabinet solutions (such as CUBE-PM639 Series or CUBE -SS Series models) to form a complete Macro Cell or CRAN Node solution. Specifications Construction .............. 0.125' Aluminum Welded Construction Outer Enclosure, Powder Coated Off White Finish, 10 Gauge Steel Battery Racks Mounting Style ............. Pad Mount Enclosure Thermal Management ....... Direct Air Cooling, Solar Shield for Ni-Cd TEC, Heating/Cooling, Solar Shield for VRLA Door Latching ............. 3-Point Latching with Pad Lockable Handle in Front, Removable Panel in Rear Battery Types / Termination ... Ni-CD or VRLA, Anderson Disconnects for Each String Bus Bars ................. Two (2) 2x14 Position Bus Bars Cable Entrance ............ Seven (7) Knockouts for 1.5/2.0" Conduit on RHS, One (1) Knockout for 1.5/2.0" Conduit on LHS, Seven (7) Knockouts for 1.672.0" Conduit on Rear MADE IN THE Two (2) 2.0" for 3.0" Conduit on Rear Alarms ................... Door Intrusion, High Temperature - Certifications .............. Telcordia GR-487 and UL 50 Supported Battery Types Manufacturer Battery Model # Ah Manufacturer Battery Model # Ah Northstar NSB170FT 170 GNB Marathon M12V180FT 180 Enersys SBS170F 170 Saft Tel.X 180 180 Enersys SBS190F 190 East Penn Deka 12AVR-150ET 150 C&D TEL12-17OF 170 East Penn Deka 12AVR-170ET 170 C&D TEL12-19OF 190 Fiamm 12UMTX170 170 C&D TEL12-21OF 210 PART NUMBER STANDARD MOUNTING OVERALL DIM. in. THERMAL SYSTEM BATTERY TRAYS BATTERY SUPPORT INDEPENDENT BUSES WEIGHT EMPTY lbs. WEIGHT w/Ni-Cd BTY CUBE-B824F1HN1 Pad Mount 46x32x32 DAC 3 6 Strings Saft Tel.X 180, 24V 1 585 1656 CUBE-B824J11-IN1 Pad Mount 74x32x32 DAC 5 10 Strin s Saft Tel.X 180, 24V 1 900 2685 CUBE-B824J2XV1 Pad Mount 74x32x32 TEC 5 10 Strings VRLA Batteries, 24V 1 1000 2785 CUBE-B848A1GV1 Pad Mount 15x32x32 DAC 1 1 String Saft Tel.X180, 48V 1 100 450 CUBE-B848C1HN1 Pad Mount 46x32x32 DAC 1 3 3 Strings Saft Tel.X 180, 48V 1 585 1656 CUBE-B848C2XV1 Pad Mount 46x32x32 TEC 3 3 Strings VRLA Batteries, 48V 1 635 17 6 CUBE-B848E1 HN1 Pad Mount 74x32x32 DAC 5 5 Strings Saft Tel.X 180, 48V 1 00 2 85 CUBE-BB48E2XV1 Pad Mount 74x32x32 TEC 5 5 Strings VRLA Batteries, 48V 1 1000 2785 CUBE-BBDLF2HN1 Pad Mount 46x32x32 DAC 3 Mix of 24V/48V Saft Tel.X 180 3 5 5 15Z6 CUBE-BBDLJ2HN1 Pad Mount 74x32x32 DAC 5 Mix of 24V/48V Saft Tel.X 180 3 900 2685 0G-0SP048-K16 Phone: (847)806.6300 Chades Industries, Ltd.ya Fax: (847) 806.6231 / Web: w .charlesindustries.com 2-3/8",2-7/8",3-1/2"OR 4-1/2"BULK PIPE ORDERED SEPARATELY�� PARTS LIST ITEM OTY PART NO. PART DESCRIPTION LENGTH UNITWT. NET WT. 1 6 X-232691 FORMED PLATE PIPE CLAMP - SITE PRO 2.74 16.46 2 6 X-232697 TRPD-HD DIAGONAL ANGLE -SRR PRO 521/2in 14.21 85.27 3 3 X-232698 TRPD-HD SUPPORT PLATE -SITE PRO 8.72 26.16 4 24 G12212 1/2".2-1/2" HDG HEX BOLT GR5 21/2 in 0.20 4.89 4 12 G1204 1/2"x4" HDG HEX BOLT GR5 FULL THREAD 4in 0.27 3.24 5 12 G12FW 1/2" HDG USE FLATWASHER 0.03 0.41 6 24 G12LW 1/2" HDG LOCKWASHER 0.01 0.33 7 24 G12NUT 1/2" HDG HEAVY 2H HEX NUT 0.07 1.72 8 3 X-ATB PIPE ATTACHMENT BRACKET 10.68 9 12 SWA123 1/2"X3-3/4" STAINLESS WEDGE ANCHOR 0.30 3.6 TOTAL WT.r 174.14 DETAIL B DETAIL C TOLERANCE NOTES'DESCRIPTION TOLERANCES ON DIMENSIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ARE: PENETRATING SAWED,SHEARED AND GAS CUT EDGES(t0.080) TRIPOD ® 158fifi-IT..46 vo GRILLED AND OA$ CUT HOLES /t 0.080 J - NO CONING OF HOLES S=uth, IN ON LASER CUT EDGES AND HOLES (SO.0f0) - NO DOWNS OF HOLES A valmontY O]IBMa BENDS ARE t 112 DEGREE ALL OTHER MACHINING(10. 080J ORo. r—111ovnL PART NO. ALL OTHER ASSEMBLY(t0.080J = 21412013 TRPD-HD-PEN „. CUSTOMER J BMC 214120131 TRPD-HD-PEN w,�FIIICATIIIONsu DC Surge Protection for RRH/Integrated Antenna Radio Head RVZDC-6627-PF-48 Tower / Base / Rooftop Model Numbers Nominal Operating Voltage RVZDC-6627-PF-48 48 VDC Nominal Discharge Current [In] 20kA 8/20 ps Maximum Surge Current [1_1 60kA 8/20 ps Maximum Impulse (Lightning) Current per IEC 61643-11 5 kA 10/350 ps Maximum Continuous Operating Voltage [U ] 75 VDC Voltage Protection Rating (VPR) per UL 1449 4th Edition 400V Protection Class as per IEC 61643-11 Class I Power Alarm cross polarity, short circuit, or power outage Intrusion Sensor microswitch Moisture Sensor infrared moisture detector Strikesorb Module Type 30-V1-2CHV Strikesorb modules installed to protect 12 Remote Radio Heads Power Boost Ready Mechanical Suppression Connection Method RS485 twisted pair connection available Compression lug, #14 - #2 AWG (2 mmz - 33 mmz) Fiber Connection Method LC -LC Single mode Pressure Equalizing Vent Gore TM Vent Environmental Rating IP 67 Operating Temperature -400 C to +800 C UV Resistant Yes Dimensions (L x W x H) X 12. " x 16. ' x 9. ' [379mfn x Omm 749mm] Weight System: 32 Ibs (14.51 kg) Combined Wind Loading 0 h su ai d 18 b 8 N) Strikesorb modules are compliant to the following Surge Protective Device (SPD) Standards Standards UL 1449 41" Edition, IEC 61643-11:2011, EN 61643-11:2012, IEEE C62.11, IEEE C62.41.2, IEEE C62.45 NEBS certified to: GR-63-CORE Issue 4, GR-1089-CORE Issue 6, GR-3108-CORE Issue 3, GR-487-CORE Issue 4, GR-950-CORE Issue 1 Product Diagram r.__T [mm] inches AWG=American Wire Gauge M us & C E ���• �www-raycapxorn G02-01-033 170615 Pramira Radio Frequency Exposure RF Safety and NIER Analysis Report 09/07/2021 Site: SEWARD Seward, AK Prepared for: Verizon WIN Table of Contents 1 Certification................................................................................................................ 3 2 Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations...................................................................... 5 3 Introduction................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Site Description: ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled...................................................................... 7 4 Predictive Analysis Details......................................................................................... 8 4.1 Analysis Locations: .............................................................................................. 8 4.2 Antenna Inventory................................................................................................ 9 4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s) - All Transmitters..................................................... 10 4.4 RF Emissions Diagram(s) - Verizon Transmitters Only .................................... 11 5 Signage/ Mitigation................................................................................................... 12 5.1 Signage/ Barrier Detail....................................................................................... 12 5.2 Signage/ Barrier Diagram................................................................................... 13 6 Conclusions and Recommendations......................................................................... 14 7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies ........................................... 15 8 Appendix B: Overview of RoofMaster® Functions and Assumptions .................... 17 9 References.................................................................................................................20 10 Limited Warranty...................................................................................................... 21 Page 2 of 21 111YA I Certification This report, prepared by Pramira, Inc. for Verizon, is intended to document compliance and evaluate power density levels as outlined in the report. The computations, analysis, and resulting report and conclusions were based on applicable FCC guidelines and regulations for maximum permissible exposure to humans consistent with FCC OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. Additionally, Pramira, Inc. certifies that the assumptions are valid and that the data used within Pramira control are accurate, including information collected as part of Pramira field surveys. Pramira, Inc. does not however certify the accuracy or correctness of any data provided to Pramira, Inc. for this analysis and report by Verizon or other third parties working on behalf of Verizon. I certify that the attached RF exposure analysis and report is correct to the best of my knowledge, and all calculations, assumptions and conclusions are based on generally acceptable engineering practices: �5 s . +: 9Nr .4tip It1- , PATRlft i 1 6- EE , r .: 09/08/2021 � � 'Exp_ /30/21 Patrick A_ Kearns, P_E_ Report Prepared by: Abdelsalam Masoud, 09/07/2021 Report Reviewed by: Mike Arnold, 09/07/2021 Page 3 of 21 103 2 Executive Summary This report provides the results of an RF power density analysis performed for Verizon at site SEWARD in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules and regulations for RF emissions described in OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. This report addresses RF safety for two classified groups defined by OET Bulletin 65: Occupational/ Controlled and General Population/ Uncontrolled. Based on the analysis, this site will be Compliant with FCC rules and regulations and Verizon's Signage and Barrier Policy if the mitigation details provided in Table 1 are implemented. Final Compliant Configuration L cautioN Bw�aiH 1 GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING NOC INFO BARRIER/MARKER Access Point(s) ❑X [TBD] * ❑ [ ] ❑ [ ] ❑ [ ] ❑X [TBD] ❑ Alpha ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ Beta ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ Gamma ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ NOTE: The table represents either the sign age/b arriers installed / removed OR items required by the market (if mitigation is not installed by consultant/vendor). * These RF signs should be posted at any Access Point to the Main Roof. (See drawing in Section 5.2). Specialty Sign Detail Location N/A Access Point N/A Alpha N/A Beta N/A Gamma N/A NOTE: The tables above represent EXISTING compliance items implemented at this location. Notes/ Additional Compliance Requirements(s): Mitigation is required per the Signage/ Barrier Diagram. Table 1: Mitigation Requirements for Compliance Page 4 of 21 119111 2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Main Roof Level will not exceed the FCC's MPE limit for General Population. The max theoretical % MPE is 5.11% directly in front of the antenna beams at the Main Roof Level. This site will operate in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and Verizon's signage and barrier policy if the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive Summary are implemented. Note: Modifications to the site: and/or increases in channel counts or power levels exceeding those listed in this report will require additional evaluation to determine compliance. Page 5 of 21 `[IR 3 Introduction The purpose of this analysis and report is to evaluate the cumulative power density levels of all non -excluded antennas located on the site and identify any areas of concern that require mitigation. This report also assesses the site's compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65; "Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio -frequency Electromagnetic Fields". The power density simulation performed for this site utilized RoofMaster® analysis software. All antennas were assigned an operating frequency and transmit power and were deemed to be operating at 100% of their rated output power. 3.1 Site Description: Site Name: SEWARD Street Address: 516 Third Avenue Seward, AK, 99664 • Latitude: 600 6' 26.8704" N • Longitude: 1490 26' 29.4216" W Structure Type: Rooftop Structure Height: ± 33' AGL • BTS Equipment Location: The Verizon equipment is located on the Main Roof. Page 6 of 21 `11r 3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled This is a Monopole application where Verizon antennas are mounted to mounting pipes on the Monopole. This is a Three -Sector site supporting LTE at 700 and 2100 MHz for all sectors. All LTE assumes 4x4 MIMO. • The values of the antennas rad center of all sectors (45') and Main Roof (33') are based on CDs and RFDS. These values must be verified on the site audit for the post study. Page 7 of 21 4 Predictive Analysis Details For purposes of this analysis, RoofMaster® was configured to provide an output based on the appropriate MPE limit(s) published in the FCC's guidelines. The antenna information was loaded into RoofMaster®, an MPE predictive analysis tool by Waterford Consultants, LLC. 4.1 Analysis Locations: Number of Elevations Analyzed: 1 • Main Roof Level A study at the other Levels was not required as the study on the Main Roof Level shows that the power density on them will not exceed the FCC's MPE limit for General Population and Occupational. Page 8 of 21 WIN 4.2 Antenna Inventory The following table contains the technical data used to simulate the power density that may be encountered with all antennas simultaneously operating at full rated power with the exception of any excluded antennas cited in this document. If co -locator's antennas exist and specific antenna details could not be secured, generic antennas, frequencies, and transmit powers were used for modeling. The assumptions used are based on past experience with communications carriers. Name (MHz) Freq Trans Power Trans Coun ther s Calc Power IN Model Main Roof Z (ft) if d BWdth Orientation VZ Alpha_Antl L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-45C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 15.24 48 90 VZ Alpha_Antl L2100 2100 60.0 4 0.0 213.9 COMMSCOPE NHH-45C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 17.51 41 90 VZ Alpha_Ant2 L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-45C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 15.24 48 90 VZ Beta_Antl L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 13.2 65 190 VZ Beta_Antl L2100 2100 60.0 4 0.0 213.9 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 15.82 62 190 V2 Beta_Ant2 L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 13.2 65 190 VZ Gamma_Antl L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 13.2 65 350 VZ Gamma_Antl L2100 2100 60.0 4 0.0 213.9 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 15.82 62 350 VZ Gamma Ant2 L700 700 40.0 2 0.5 71.3 COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B 12.0 Panel 8.0 13.2 65 350 The antenna Z-heights listed above are referenced to the Main Roof Levels. Page 9 of 21 4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s) - All Transmitters The following Diagram(s) represent the theoretical spatially averaged Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) percentages that are expected for each study's elevation. An additional 1% Occupational MPE Limit (5% General Population MPE limit) is included to demonstrate where Verizon is a significant contributor to the accessible areas where multiple carriers' transmitters may be present. Reference Plane: Main Roof Level Adjacent Roof 1 N iVZW Gamma , Adjacent 3�a° Roof 2 I Ground I I L Main Roof Ground f' I NIZN ,alpha l Adjacent I Roof 3 1 rr VZW Beta 1900 Ground Fenxni I�IF'E Leoer,d ■ 1>. ztz: ■ 20i -100>d ❑ 1Co/ >-10o0: ■ 1000 + Occupational Limits Sula 09 10 foot grid size (Avg: 33 to 39 Feet Max Value: 5.11 Carrier Color Code Venzan Page 10 of 21 "llf, 4.4 RF Emissions Diagram(s) - Verizon Transmitters Only The following Diagram(s) represent the theoretical spatially averaged Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) percentages that are expected for each study's elevation. An additional 1% Occupational MPE Limit (5% General Population MPE limit) is included to demonstrate where Verizon is a significant contributor to the accessible areas where multiple carriers' transmitters may be present. Reference Plane: Main Roof Percent MPE Legend Adjacent ❑ 0% 1 : Roof 11' 2af 20%-100% .f ❑ 1�%-1000` L.LiVZW Adjacent 1ow/+ Occupational Limits 350° Roof 2 Sula 09 I 10 foot grid size (Avg: 33 to 39 feet) Max Value: 5.11 Ground 1 Carrier Color Code 1. I Verizon Main C Roof Y Ground ill I VZNN7 Alpha J90° —Tr� I Adjacent 1 1 1_rRoof 3 1 I i VZW Beta Ground 19(r Page 11 of 21 ISO 5 Signage/ Mitigation 5.1 Signage/Barrier Detail Final Compliant Configuration °tea r �- -- (('j)) i.� ACAUTIoN _ �� �► Y A = — �_ 9 w GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING NOC INFO BARRIER/MARKER Access Point(s) ❑X [TBD] * ❑ [ ] ❑ [] ❑ [ ] ❑x [TBD] * ❑ Alpha ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ Beta ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ Gamma ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ [] ❑ NOTE: The table represents either the sign age/b arriers installed / removed OR items required by the market (if mitigation is not installed by consultant/vendor). * These RF signs should be posted at any Access Point to the Main Roof. (See drawing in Section 5.2). Specialty Sign Detail Location N/A Access Point N/A Alpha N/A Beta N/A Gamma N/A NOTE: The tables above represent EXISTING compliance items implemented at this location. Notes/ Additional Compliance Requirements(s): Mitigation is required per the Signage/ Barrier Diagram. Table 2: Mitigation Requirements for Compliance Page 12 of 21 "V: 5.2 Signage/Barrier Diagram NOC and Guidelines signs need to be posted at any Access Point to the Main Roof. 11C!�7 Adjacei Roof 1 Main Roof Adjacent Roof 2 Ground Adjacent oof 3 Page 13 of 21 "K] 6 Conclusions and Recommendations • The results of the analysis indicate that the power density levels in the generally accessible areas on the Main Roof Level will not exceed the FCC's MPE limit for General Population. • The max theoretical % MPE is 5.11% directly in front of the antenna beams at the Main Roof Level. This site will operate in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and Verizon's signage and barrier policy if the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive Summary are implemented. Note: Modifications to the site: and/or increases in channel counts or power levels exceeding those listed in this report will require additional evaluation to determine compliance. Page 14 of 21 ISE 7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies In August of 1997, the FCC published OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01 to regulate methods for evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. The FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields incorporate two categories of limits; namely "Controlled" (a.k.a. Occupational) and "Uncontrolled" (a.k.a. General Public). The guidelines offer suggested methods for evaluating fixed RF transmitters to ensure that the controlled and uncontrolled limits deemed safe by the FC for human exposure are not exceeded. OET Bulletin 65 recommended guidelines are intended to allow an applicant to "make a reasonably quick determination as to whether a proposed facility is in compliance with the limits." In addition, the guidelines offer alternate supplementary considerations and procedures such as field measurements and more detailed analysis that should be used for multiple emitter situations. These guidelines define RF as emissions in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 100 GHz. The FCC define Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits within this frequency range based on limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The specific MPE limits defined by the FCC are as follows: rrequency Range [MHz] 0.3 - 3.0 3.0 - 30 30 - 300 300 - 1, 500 1,500- 100,000 rrequency Range [MHz] 0.3 - 3.0 3.0 - 30 30 - 300 300 - 1, 500 1,500- 100,000 Electric Field Strength (E) [V/m] 614 1842/f 61.4 Electric Field Strength (E) [V/m] 614 842/f 27.5 Occupational/Con Magnetic Field Strength (H) [Alm] 1.63 4.89/f 0.163 eneral Population/U Magnetic Field Strength (H) [Alm 1.63 2.19/f 0.073 lied Exposure Power Density (S) [mW/Cm^2] 100* 900/f^2* 1 f/300 5 ncontrolled Expos Power Density ] (S) [mW/Cm^2] 100* 180/f^2* 0.2 f/1500 1 f = frequency *Plane -wave equivalent power density Averaging Time JEJ^2, IHJ^2 or S [minutes] 6 6 6 6 6 re Averaging Time JEJ^2, IHJ^2 or S [minutes] 30 30 30 30 30 The FCC states that "Occupational/ Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for Occupational/ Controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where Occupational/ Controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure." Page 15 of 21 MR For General Population/ Uncontrolled limits, the FCC states that "General Population/ Uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not fully be aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure." For purposes of this analysis, all limits are evaluated against the Power Density limits. Typical guidelines for determining whether Occupational/ Controlled limits can be applied include ensuring the environment (such as a rooftop) as limited/controlled access via locked doors or physical barrier that are preferably controlled by a landlord that is aware of the situation and can inform anyone going through the locked door of the existence of the RF emissions. Such notification/awareness is typically accomplished by means of signage on the door, or other access to the area of concern, as well as signage on or near the antennas. Examples of such signs include the following: GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING This sign will inform This sign indicates This sign indicates This sign indicates that RF anyone of the basic that RF emissions that RF emissions emissions may exceed at precautions to follow may exceed the FCC may exceed the least 1 Ox the FCC when entering an area General Population FCC Occupational Occupational MPE limit. with transmitting MPE limit. MPE limit. radiofrequency equipment. ®gJOTICE® ACgU710N 77 NOC INFORMATION ' ,ft ro, T Information signs are used as a means to provide contact information for any questions or concerns. They will include specific cell site identification information and the Verizon Wireless Network Operations Center phone number. Standards for when to use each of the above signs for Occupational situations are as follows: No sign required: <20% of Occupational MPE Blue Sign, Notice: 20% to <100% of MPE Yellow Sign, Caution: 100% to <1000% of MPE Red Sign, Warning: >_1000% of MPE All MPE references are to the FCC Occupational limits. Page 16 of 21 "ll 8 Appendix B: Overview of RootMaster® Functions and Assumptions RoofMaster® is a RF Compliance software package designed to enable the analysis, assessment and mitigation of communications sites with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. RoofMaster© was developed in 2008 by Waterford Consultants to support compliance assessments performed at single and multi -operator wireless locations throughout North America and has been in service since 2008. Real -world experience in evaluating thousands of base station installations is reflected in the RoofMaster0 design approach. This document provides a guide for creating simulations of RF hazard conditions through the characterization of antenna systems and site features and through FCC -specified computational analysis. On any structure, one may encounter antennas installed by wireless service providers, public safety and other FCC -licensed and unlicensed operators. Siting constraints have resulted in diverse and complex environments accessible to people performing a variety of activities around these antennas. RoofMaster® supports the characterization of these locations to convey important information regarding RF sources and accessible areas necessary to evaluate the potential for human exposure to hazardous levels of RF energy. RoofMaster® supports the depiction of communications sites through the display of construction drawing or aerial photography image files as well as providing line drawing tools. These representations are scalable to enable the modeling of any location. RoofMaster® utilizes a three-dimensional spatial framework consisting of a 1000 x 1000 grid with unlimited vertical dimensions necessary for the positioning of antennas and modeling of RF conditions at each grid point throughout the space. Predictive analysis is performed on a study plane at a specified elevation. The subsequent sections of this guide provide the steps necessary to create a site representation and conduct these studies. RoofMaster© employs several power density prediction models based on the computational approaches set forth in the Federal Communications Commission's Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, OET Bulletin 65. This guideline utilizes several antenna and operational parameters in calculating the power density contributions from each emitter at specified points throughout the study space. RoofMaster® enables antennas to be fully defined in site specific aspects as well as through the use of a library of manufacturer data. The parameters include: Page 17 of 21 MIN § Antenna model § Radiation patterns § Aperture length § Gain § Beamwidth § Antenna radiation center § Azimuth § Mechanical downtilt § Location § Frequency § Power into antenna In OET-65, the Cylindrical Model is presented as an approach to determine the spatially averaged power density in the near field directly in front of an antenna. In order to implement this model in all directions, RoofMaster® utilizes the antenna manufacturer horizontal pattern data. Additionally, RoofMaster® incorporates factors that reduce the power density by the inverse square of horizontal and vertical distance beyond the near field region. Power density is calculated as follows: S is the spatially averaged power density value • R is the horizontal distance meters to the study point • h is the aperture length in meters • Pin is power into the antenna input port in Watts RoofMaster® Implementation: Gx is gain offset to study point as specified in manufacturer horizontal pattern • Pin is adjusted by the portion of the antenna aperture in the 0-6 ft. vertical study zone • Hr accounts for 1/R2 Far Field roll off which starts at 2*h Vr accounts for 1/ (vertical distance) roll off from antenna bottom to the top of the 0-6 ft. study zone (or antenna top to bottom of 0-6 ft. study zone) Page 18 of 21 Is .a - Yo ----------- 1, :�>Beamwidth Horizontal Distance Page 19 of 21 INK 9 References FCC (1997). "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields"; Federal Communications Commission; Office of Engineering and Technology, OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August. Waterford Consultants, LLC (2008). RoofMaster® User Guide, Waterford Consultants, LLC. Page 20 of 21 `FU 10 Limited Warranty Pramira, Inc. warrants that this analysis was performed in good faith using the methodologies and assumptions covered in this report and that data used for the analysis and report were obtained by Pramira, Inc. employees or representatives via site surveys or research of Verizon's available information. In the event that specific third -party details were not available, best efforts were made to use assumptions that are based on industry experience of various carriers' standards without violating any confidential information obtained under non -disclosure terms. Pramira, Inc. also warrants that this analysis was performed in accordance with industry acceptable standards and methods. There are no other warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, relating to this agreement or to the services rendered by Pramira hereunder. In no event shall Pramira be held liable to Verizon, or to any third party, for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, including but not limited to loss of profits, loss of data, loss of good will, and increased expenses. In no event shall Pramira be liable to Verizon for damages, whether based in contract, tort, negligence, strict liability, or otherwise, exceeding the amount payable hereunder for the services giving rise to such liability. Page 21 of 21 IN WIRELESS FACILITY REMOVAL AGREEMENT THIS WIRELESS FACILITY REMOVAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , by and between the City of Seward, whose address is 410 Adams Street, Seward, Alaska 99664 (the "City") and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, a Delaware general partnership, with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 (the Wireless Facility Owner/Operator") BACKGROUND WHEREAS, a conditional use permit was issued for a new colocation of Wireless Equipment, approved by the City on , to permit the Wireless Facility Owner to construct and operate the Wireless Facility (the "Facility") within the City of Seward, located on a rooftop leased to the Wireless Facility Owner by Property Owner and more fully described In the legal description attached as Exhibit "A"; WHEREAS Wireless Facility Owner intends to u s e s u c h facility as a commercial communication Wireless Facility; and, WHEREAS the parties make this Agreement for the purpose of satisfying the requirement of Seward Municipal Code 15.10.250(c)(1)0). NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: Notice. Wireless Facility Owner or Property Owner shall notify the City of Seward Planning Department of if the Wireless Facility is substantially unused for a period of 11 months or within thirty (30) days if the facility is unused or becomes obsolete due to changing technology. a. Definition of substantially unused. The term substantially unused is defined to mean the cessation of reception orbroadcasting of radio, light, or electromagnetic type signals to or from the communication facility. b. Definition of obsolete. The term "unused or obsolete due to changing technology" is defined to mean the facility is not used because technology has changed, and the facility's intended use is no longer commercially viable. `��: DocuSign Envelope ID: 940F73CF-9AD7-40AF-BE7D-C60FOAF15A77 2. Wireless Facility Removal by Wireless Facility Owner and Property Owner. Wireless Facility Owner and Property Owner agree that removal of the commercial communication facility located on the real property described on attached Exhibit A is governed by the provisions of KMC15.10.250, as it is amended from time to time, which is incorporated herein by reference and presently provides as follows: a. Substantially unused and obsolete technoloay. Awritten agreement, on a form approved by the City Attorney, to remove the communications facility/antenna(s) within one hundred eighty (180) days after the communications facility/antenna(s)issubstantially unused fora period oftwelve (12) consecutive months. If facility is unused orifa facility becomes obsolete due to changing technology, it shall be the responsibility of the 4desst* owner and/or property owner to remove the wireless facility andto restore the site to its original condition within sixty (60) days. If the wireless facility is not removed within this sixty (60) day period, the City of Seward may notify the wireless facility owner that it will contract for removal at the cost of the owner. b. Consequence substantially unused facility or facility becoming obsolete. Upon notice or a determination that the facility has been substantially unused or that the facility has become obsolete, or property owner shall: (1) If the facility is substantially unused, at no cost to the City, dismantle and remove the facility within 180 days. (2) If facility becomes obsolete, at no cost to the City, dismantle and remove the facility within 60 days. Removal of Wireless Facility by City. In the event that Wireless Facility Owner or Property Owner fail to remove the Wireless Facility within the one hundred eighty (180) day or (60) day periods set forth in the Code, the City may have the Wireless Facility removed by a contractor of the City's choosing and Wireless Facility Operator and Property Owner shall be responsible for the City's reasonable direct and indirect cost of removal; and the City may record a lien against the real property described on attached Exhibit A and the personal property of the Property Owner/Wireless Facility Owner for costs of removal. 4. Non -liability of City. City shall not be responsible to Property Owner or Wireless Facility Owner for damage to any structures or property caused by or related to removal of the Tower. 5. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Seward Recording District and shall run with the land and be binding on any successors or assigns of Property Owner and Wireless Facility Owner. 123 Notices. All notices and other communication hereunder shall be in writing to the parties to be notified as follows: If to the Wireless Facility Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Owner, to: One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100 Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 If to the Property Owner, to: Alaska State DNR 550 W 7th Avenue Suite 650 Anchorage AK 99501 City of Seward If to the City, to: 410 Adams Street Seward, AK 99664 124 Or to such other address as each party may designate for itself by like notice. Amendments or Waiver. This Agreement may be changed, discharged, or terminated only by writing signed by all parties hereto. No waiver of any provision of or performance, right or obligation under this Agreement shall be valid except when delivered to the other parties to this Agreement. No delay oromission by any party in exercising any right with respect hereto shall operate as waiver. A waiver onanyone occasion shall not be construed as a barto, or waiver of, any right or remedy on any further occasion. Severability. To the extent any provision of this Agreement is prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition, or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of the Agreement. Governina Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Alaska. 10. Entire Aareement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties relating to the Security and removal of Wreless Fa*. 11. Execution of Counterparts. This Agreement and any written direction maybe executed in counterparts, which, when so executed, shall constitute one and the same agreement. INWFFNESS WHEREOF, theparties hereto have hereunto settheirhands, thedayand year stated In the Individual acknowledgments below. `R EXHIBIT "A" `Fz: A rn t.fu rori_ -Lric lug verizonV I his doc...... ,—n—p lard Inform an anal only. Visual Impacts will be affected by location and vi,hility of ohserv,r Seward Antenna locations • Photosim #1 (Looking North West) Photosim #2 (Looking South East) Photosim #3I(Looking South West) C<<'?}) Top of Proposed Antenna: 49.0' Existing Building Height: 34.9' At-lu TIN -- INC Project Description: verizon)l Adding new antennas, mounts and equipment to existing 128 Verizon Wireless site I his doc...... ,—n—p lard In farm an anal only. Visual Impacts will be affected by location and vi,hiliry of ohserv,r AK Seward Top of Proposed Antenna: 49.0' Existing Building Height: 34.9' Project Description: VerIZ011v Adding new antennas, mounts and equipment to existing 129 Verizon Wireless site I his ductrin eni is eoncepival grid Inform atianal only. Visual Impacts di be aff,—d by l—t— and vi,hility of oh-rv,r (({'?)) Top of Proposed Antenna: 49.0' Existing Building Height: 34.9' couMHi lug Project Description: verizonv Adding new antennas, mounts and equipment to existing 130 Verizon Wireless site I his doc...... ,—n—p lard In farm an anal only. Visual Impacts will be affected by location and vi,hiliry of ohserv,r Sponsored by: Applicant CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2021-027 A Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Seward, Alaska, Granting a Conditional Use Permit to OBI Seafoods to Construct an Employee Campground with Modular Housing on Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision, Located at 1607 Northwestern Circle; Within an Industrial (I) Zoning District. WHEREAS, Brian O'Leary of OBI Seafoods has applied for a Conditional Use Permit from the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission to construct and operate an employee campground on the property located at 1607 Northwestern Circle Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the property is in an Industrial (I) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, an employee campground is allowed in an Industrial Zoning District with an approved CUP per City Code § 15.10.226 — Land Use Table; and WHEREAS, the applicant has complied with all of the public hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission that: Section 1. According to SCC 15.10.320.D., the Commission shall establish a finding that the use satisfies the following conditions prior to granting a conditional use permit: A. The use is consistent with the purpose of this chapter (the Seward Zoning Code) and the purposes of the zoning district. Finding: An employee campground is allowed in an Industrial Zoning District with an approved CUP per City Code § 15.10.226 — Land Use Table. B. The value ofadjoining property will not be significantly impaired. Finding: This condition has been met. The surrounding property is primarily used for Industrial businesses and storage, and will not be affected by an employee campground constructed from Modular housing units. `rd Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-027 Page 2 of 4 C. The proposed use is in harmony with the Seward Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The Seward 2030 Comprehensive Plan (2017) and Strategic Plan (1999) contain wording that should be discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine whether the proposed use is indeed in harmony with the Seward Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan. Seward Comprehensive Plan (approved by Council, May 30, 2017) Vol I Ch 2.2.11 - Economic Base • "We value a stable economic environment, economic diversity, year-round businesses, environmentally responsible industry, and employment that promote a high standard of living." • "Encourage the prudent management of resources for healthy commercial and sports fishing industries." • "Promote expansion and development of local marine entrepreneurial businesses." Strategic Plan (1999) Economic Base — "We are a community that promotes economic diversity, encourages growth of year-round businesses, desires environmentally -responsible industry, and seeks jobs that promote a higher standard of living" (Page 5). "Adjust local development regulations, where appropriate, to encourage development that is consistent with our economic base vision" (Page 5). D. Public Services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. Finding: Water, sewer, and power are available to the property. Seward City Code §15.10.226 0)(4) states, "Sanitary facilities shall include either permanent or portable toilets. If permanent facilities are constructed, they shall conform to §8.15.425(b). Shower facilities may either be on -site in conformance with §8.15.425(b), or provided on the job site of the employer. City Code requires that every business within the City must provide containers suitable for refuse collection (SCC 14.05). E. The proposed use will not be harmful to the public safety, health or welfare. Finding: Applicant has not provided an explanation to satisfy this requirement. However, this condition will be met through deliberation of proposed CUP requirements by Staff and Commissioners. F. Any and all specific conditions deemed necessary by the commission to fulfill the above -mentioned conditions shall be met by the applicant. These may include but IBY, Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-027 Page 3 of 4 are not limited to measures relative to access, screening, site development, building design, operation of the use, and other similar aspects related to the proposed use. Based on the above findings and conclusions, approval of the CUP shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Each sleeping area has a working smoke detector that is less than 10 years old. 2. Fire Extinguishers are professionally inspected and tagged annually, are easily accessible and labeled, and within 75' of all occupants. 3. No electrical hazards exist, including open junction boxes, extension cords used for permanent wiring, or multi -use plug adaptors. 4. Each MOD unit has an identification numbering system, "address", labeled on the outside of the unit for emergency response. 5. Exits and exit doors are free of obstruction and doors swing freely. 6. The applicant shall work with all City Utility Departments for any possible upgrades or connections to the water, sewer and/or electric utilities. 7. All parking and maneuverability requirements as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall remain on site for the life of the use. 8. Bear -proof / bird resistant containers shall be provided for all garbage and refuse for the life of the use. 9. Per Seward City Code § 15.10.325(f). an approved CUP shall lapse six months from the date of approval if the use for which the permit was issued has not been implemented or a building permit obtained. The Commission may grant a six-month extension upon finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. 10. Modification of final approval of a conditional use permit may, upon application by the permitee, be modified by the Planning and Zoning Commission: a. When changed conditions cause the conditional use to no longer conform to the standards for its approval. b. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards for its approval. c. The modification plan shall be subject to a public hearing and a filing fee set by City Council Resolution. Section 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the proposed use, subject to the above conditions satisfies the criteria for granting a conditional use permit provided the conditions listed on Section 1, Subsections A through F are met by the applicant, and authorizes the administration to issue a conditional use permit to Brian O'Leary of OBI Seafoods to construct and operate an employee campground at 1607 Northwestern Circle Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision, within an Industrial Zoning District. 133 Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-027 Page 4 of 4 Section 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that adherence to the conditions of this permit is paramount in maintaining the intent of Seward City Code Section 15.10.320: Conditional Use Permits, and authorizes the administration to issue a conditional use permit. Additionally, the administration shall periodically confirm the use conforms to the standards of its approval. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect 10 days following its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission this 2nd day of November 2021. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Tom Swann, Vice Chair 134 P&Z Agenda Statement Meeting Date: November 2, 2021 Through: From: Courtney L. Bringhurst, Planner Agenda Item: Resolution 2021-027 Application for a Conditional Use Permit to OBI Seafoods to Construct an Employee Campground with Modular Housing on Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision, Located at 1607 Northwestern Circle; Within an Industrial (I) Zoning District. BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: Brian O'Leary of OBI Seafoods has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission to construct and operate an employee campground on the property located at 1607 Northwestern Circle Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision. Seward City Code § 15.10.140 (b)(18)(c) states that and employee campground is "an area operated by an established business with high seasonal employment of transient workers as a housing alternative and not construed to be a construction camp." The definition of a construction camp (per lawinsider.com) is "a temporary facility for the temporary living accommodation of persons engaged in construction or maintenance of a building structure, machinery or equipment on the site on which the construction camp is located for the duration of such construction or maintenance and which must be removed upon completion of the construction project." The Land Use Table in City Code § 15.10.226 allows Employee Campgrounds with an approved Conditional Use Permit in an Industrial Zoning District. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Development Requirements: Employee Campground requirements are specified in City Code §15.20.226 0) as having "at least ten feet clear space between camping units". The applicant has stated that the "east west spacing is 12 feet between each set of MOD's. The roadway between rows on and two is 20 feet. The spacing between rows 2 and 3 is 8 feet." Floodplain status: According to the Kenai Peninsula Floodplain Map, the area is not located within a flood zone. `KR Utilities: City water, sewer, and electrical service are available to the proposed location. City code §15.10.226 0) (3&4) also requires that "Garbage and refuse requirements of §8.15.340 shall also apply to employee campgrounds. Sanitary facilities shall include either permanent or portable toilets. If permanent facilities are constructed, they shall conform to §8.15.425(b). Shower facilities may either be on -site in conformance with §8.15.425(b), or provided on the job site of the employer. Parking: Seward City Code does not have specific requirements for employee campground parking. § 15.10.215 (b) - Industrial, processing, manufacturing and assembling does require "1 parking space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area except that office space shall provide parking space as required for offices". Dormitories/Bunkhouses require "1 space per 4 residents at maximum". CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: **Findings to be Evaluated by Commissioners to Determine Consistent Yes No N/A Comprehensive Plan (2030, approved by Council2017): Vol I Ch 2.2.11 - Economic Base • "We value a stable economic environment, economic diversity, year-round businesses, environmentally responsible industry, and 1. employment that promote a high standard of living." • "Encourage the prudent management of resources for healthy commercial and sports fishing industries." • "Promote expansion and development of local marine entrepreneurial businesses." Strategic Plan (1999): Economic Base — "We are a community that promotes economic diversity, encourages growth of year-round businesses, desires environmentally -responsible industry, and seeks jobs that promote a 2. higher standard of living" (Page 5). "Adjust local development regulations, where appropriate, to encourage development that is consistent with our economic base vision" (Page 5). Staff Comments: Department Comments No Comment N/A Building Department X Fire Department Per City Code these are not classified as temporary structures nor permanent buildings, so no code review or inspections will be performed. The fire and building department suggest requiring an annual self -inspection and attestation to Community Development verifying the conditions in this CUP are iKi1.1 met. Public Works Department X Harbor Department X Police Department X Electric Department Would like to see plans for electrical connections to MOD's. Telecommunications X Public Notice: Property owners within three hundred (300) feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Leirer Industrial Subdivision were notified of this proposed conditional use permit action. Public notice signs were posted on the property and all other public hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040 were complied with. At the time of this publication the Community Development Department has received no public inquiries regarding the proposed Conditional Use Permit. If any correspondence is received after publication of this agenda statement, it will be presented as a lay down item at the Commission meeting. Recommended Conditions: 1. Each sleeping area has a working smoke detector that is less than 10 years old. 2. Fire Extinguishers are professionally inspected and tagged annually, are easily accessible and labeled, and within 75' of all occupants. 3. No electrical hazards exist, including open junction boxes, extension cords used for permanent wiring, or multi -use plug adaptors. 4. Each MOD unit has an identification numbering system, "address", labeled on the outside of the unit for emergency response. 5. Exits and exit doors are free of obstruction and doors swing freely. 6. The applicant shall work with all City Utility Departments for any possible upgrades or connections to the water, sewer and/or electric utilities. 7. All parking and maneuverability requirements as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall remain on site for the life of the use. 8. Bear -proof / bird resistant containers shall be provided for all garbage and refuse for the life of the use. 9. Per Seward City Code § 15.10.325(f). an approved CUP shall lapse six months from the date of approval if the use for which the permit was issued has not been implemented or a building permit obtained. The Commission may grant a six-month extension upon finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. 10. Modification of final approval of a conditional use permit may, upon application by the permitee, be modified by the Planning and Zoning Commission: a. When changed conditions cause the conditional use to no longer conform to the standards for its approval. `KrA b. To implement a different development plan conforming to the standards for its approval. c. The modification plan shall be subject to a public hearing and a riling fee set by City Council Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission spend adequate time reviewing and adjusting the recommended conditions of this CUP before approval of Resolution 2021-027. 138 CITY OF SEWARD Community Development P. O. Box 167 239 5th Avenue 907.224.4049- Director Seward, Alaska 99664 907.224.4020- Planner 907.224.4049- Plainuiig Assistant CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION This completed application is to be submitted to the Community Development Department no later than four (4) weeks in advance of the next regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of each month. The application must be accompanied by the $300 nonrefundable filing fee. In addition, please provide an as -built survey if the property has been developed or a scaled site plan with elevations if the property is undeveloped. Applicant: Address: �PO1 Telephone Number: qQ-j - ZZN - 339 ! Email: Y_ . ole-4 Se6�r, s e- Property Owner (if other than applicant): D171 Address: i'u�r-ano� A Telephone Number: q !0 - 19 -71 LS Email: Sc- �Ll red' (8 o- tic Property Description Address: N V4 Qxw, Lot Size: 100 DSO Lot: Block: Subdivision: Kenai Peninsula Borough Tax Parcel ID Number: 1 Development Information .1 What structures are on the property? How is the property being used? / ° What is the proposed use of the property?% What is the development timeline?_ /�% Please note that prior to the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission granting a Conditional Use Permit, it shall be established that the proposed use satisfies the following conditions of Seward City Code 15.10.320 (See the attached pages for specific City Code requirements) `KR A) The proposed use is consistent with the requirements of the Seward Zoning Code and the designated zoning district. Please describe the use. Industrial (1) ;; (i mt.,ML Aw U,.�,tZ n,u _ -6 la.. U+ A-A'A -' J-4., ayc:i�v rte.e��d B) Describe any impacts to the adjoining properties and how property values may be affected. N�- C) How is the proposed use consistent with the Seward Comprehensive Plan? Explain. You can view the plan at: http:/iwww.cityofseward.us/ NA D) Describe / list the public services and facilities that will serve the proposed use. (i.e., roads, utilities.) E) The proposed project or use must not be harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. Describe any mitigation measures that may be needed to protect the public health, safety and welfare. F) Include building elevation plans and a site plan, drawn to scale. The site plan should include: 1) Property dimensions ❑ 2) Location and dimensions of existing and planned buildings 3) Parking configuration A 4) Driveways and access ❑ 5) Natural features ❑ 61 Other pertinent information 106 I hereby certify that the above statements and other information submitted are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I have the following legal interest in the property: Owner of record I understand that this item will be scheduled for action only if all application materials are submitted not less than three weeks in advance of the next regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Regular meetings are held thce, first Tuesday of every month. Applicant Signature: w Property Owner Signature: t,�,� '�l �� l� — BRA.+, Ink,0r)SPV Enclosed: $300 Paym 9, To 40, d "' l+ Dimensioned plot plan / drawings Other: MIN am "AU �wm :.. �..e6•vF:�r—nr—E I �mlaKAar p uaun rnwK[eemw a aax Gse[arnD[u,:,w ws a,r � sE MKictt tA[i�sSl sMFies6 M wa' © �aiAKw iaPMK u smr 1l ATv/m rr4 AA#DIA r¢a[+f0 vr6 rpai [aSK mBDM alai ® � KA RanEfta M.x M IpO.bROA m �wmx ar rxr,l-ar"a.: ra. unmrs EzrK m Doa: ® r..�F,u.EE�a=�.�aA,AADDa prr,a,>A�A � uKmFAtt.PurEmK m wu K ATGrr m DEmiam xxwew rD KK, raD. s A��.4"u"SrA sm,r_y-�yy S.¢KMUKK N aw: D � .r aar,�w ErY,: rw raD. Daraaa�D[E. mprrM19pGa�xr EA4vMl m Gwn v ALASCtiv. auC OnrK ® Dea'/so.i ra¢ssr. DEzaww wY>, 1p4 eaa ® �QAM¢E�raarpry W�rPpC rNris ® �mDwirrxiei i>MQ Pa /WnTD/�OP�SSAaE ® � Grtxdr [MK iq p,aM aMA0.[P pMaiAwN wDAxar urx EwivexxT ai a anP vAew u wn �PR3�iH�Sxo (.mElms [W4 �'A M9�W� A'R4M-T-IaY FIX uiTIIkS tJrK x6cIX (p Ai ® . Prmwln eci�v r/, Paw faa fMwK sacra) unnermwarp,r E KrpEm wi z K.a raD rvrwK mT z wax q reF rAaudrx rAwa r m Garmsrs r saae uI,rDAx 6 x vez sxa tArarrs4oK ti, mc« 4 E"".Rawi a m�.aD Kap nmr,rm F.we,.K p wE.wr rv4sawnuem.K sKav Emma m r,� a<m.AGaA. AA awr-m-w>primirul�rw�>>Eurcss EmKmmx tpvl�K.rAnrKa 9KRiaavi��aMui GSEaMEK �. NUMA:Gro4T F,SaAM m>At490r'wmY mRYGHE B:C E�tYYMi K �PIrAA� e1A�r a[Iw S� G'-MIY, 143 ItiT ayxx Uoz-19� {IXE TD&E �1. *01 Location map - CUP App rth Hinkley StteM, Soldotra, Alaska 99669 • Mileposts City Limits Highways -- Major Roads Roads --m Town Medium Volume This -map is a user generated static outout from an Internet mapping site and is for reference or4y Data layers that appear on thismao mayor may rw he accurate, current, ar othersuse reliable, lr is not to be used for navigation- Notes Actual Location, Records and Aerial 0 0.02 0.05 Miles Imagery mmommmmmlK---- KPB 14525031 Coordinate System: NAD_1983_$tatePlane_Alaska 4 FIPS 5004_feet 1607 Northwestern Circle DATE PRINTED: 10/27/2024 144 YM. %° ZA t.n,d,,'�""}"^ y x' '". �" 4�GF.^a..�,,�+a�����^�'c'.�}'riLx��`� � �� '.,i-iJ• � ++�� � "r;g �•.� 'rTrA °' -M1; o- y � ,� '�� "� e� a„,.�.° _,� 5t a h.. ' �;.;.,.. _: .,± r"�;�^"��'1 f�i� -7Pa �ti•r-�`�';tu_ �" * fir, �' � r 7 ` '1,; a 3s . . . . . . I .� AMER", 4 Brian 01ear From: Blaine Bardarson <bardy689@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2021 9:06 PM To: Brian O'Leary Subject: Elevation The east west spacing is 12 feet between each set of MODs. The roadway between rows one and two is 20 feet. The spacing between rows 2 and 3 is 8 feet. This layout was a team effort with the city. Fire Dept, community development, Electric dept, city manager and building Department. 1 148 Sponsored by: Applicant CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2021-028 A Resolution Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Recommending Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval Of The Preliminary Replat Of Lot 4A-1 And Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, Creating Four Lots; Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, And Lot 4A-4; Vacating The West 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, And East 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat. WHEREAS, the City of Seward Harbor, per the request of JAG Alaska Inc, has submitted a preliminary replat to the City of Seward for review and recommendation to the Kenai Peninsula Borough; and WHEREAS, this replat creates four new parcels, Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, and Lot 4A-4 by subdividing Lot 4A-1 and Lot 41), Block 7 Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, SMIC, Raibow Replat, also known as 3305 & 3409 Morris Avenue Seward, Alaska in the Seward Marine Industrial Center; and WHEREAS, the parcels are zoned Industrial (I); and WHEREAS, the property currently has access to municipal road, water, sewer, and electric; and WHEREAS, all conditions required by Seward City Code § 16.01.015, Conditions to plat approval, were met; the property owners within 300 feet of the requested replat were notified of the proposed subdivision, and the property was posted with public notice signage; and WHEREAS, it is the Planning and Zoning Commission's responsibility to act in an advisory capacity to the Seward City Council and the Kenai Peninsula Borough regarding subdivision plat proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission that: Section 1. The Commission hereby recommends that, in accordance with Seward City Code Section 16.01.015 (B), the City Council and Kenai Peninsula Borough approve the submittal of the Replat Of Lot 4A-1 And Lot 41), Block 7, Fourth Of 149 Seward Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2021-028 Page 2 of 2 July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, Creating Four Lots; Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, And Lot 4A-4; Vacating The West 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 41), Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, And East 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Seward Planning and Zoning Commission this 2nd day of November 2021. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Brenda Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Tom Swann, Vice Chair 150 P&Z Agenda Statement Meeting Date: November 2, 2021 Through: From: Courtney L Bringhurst, Planner Agenda Item: Recommending City Council and Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval Of The Preliminary Replat Of Lot 4A-1 And Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, Creating Four Lots; Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, And Lot 4A-4; Vacating The West 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, And East 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat. BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: Attached for the Commission's review and recommendation to the City Council and the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission is a preliminary replat submitted by the Seward City Harbor on behalf of JAG Alaska, Inc. This platting action creates four new parcels, Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, and Lot 4A-4 by subdividing Lot 4A-1 and Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, SMIC, Raibow Replat, also known as 3305 & 3409 Morris Avenue Seward, Alaska in the Seward Marine Industrial Center. JAG Alaska, Inc requested this plat in order to increase the footprint of the land they are currently leasing at the Seward Shipyard. This would allow them to extend the existing rail system on the property to create additional ship berthing and much needed additional employee parking that together will support increased annual volume of work that can be performed at the facility. In accordance with Borough requirements, the City must review and comment on a plat before submittal to the Borough for approval. SUBDIVISION REVIEW: Zoning: The property is zoned Industrial (I). Size: Lot 4A-2 is 3.137 acres; Lot 4D-1 is 1.895 acres; Lot 4A-3 is 2.643 acres; Lot 4A-4 is 3.478 acres. Utilities: These Lots currently have access to City water, sewer, electricity, and fire hydrants. (see attached utility map page 163) M Existinz Use: These lots are currently being used for marine repair and storage. Access: Lot 4A-2 can be accessed from Morris Avenue. Lot 4D-1 can be accessed from Morris Avenue or Olga Street. Lot 4A-3 can be accessed from Olga Street. Lot 4A-4 can be accessed from Olga Street or Sorrel Road. Flood Zone: The lots are within a Flood Zone D. The Zone D designation is used for areas where there are possible but undetermined flood hazards. CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No N/A Comprehensive Plan (2030, approved by Council 2017): Vol 1 Ch 2.2.11 - The Comprehensive Plan encourages completing the development of SMIC as a revenue source with year-round employment opportunities. 1. Vol 1 Ch 3.5.1.2 - Support the SMIC Development Plan to include X new market trends and modern technologies for ship repair and construction, shipping of natural resource products, boat storage, and other compatible industries, soliciting support from Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA) and the US Economic Development Administration EDA . �' Strategic Plan (1999): X "Expand development in the Seward Marine Industrial Center" (page 7). Staff Comments: All staff and administration concerns have been addressed and all City department heads recommend approval of this preliminary replat. Department Comments No N/A Comment Building Department X No response Fire Department There are currently fire hydrants around the property and existing buildings. Code states buildings cannot be more than 250' from a hydrant. Just re -plating wouldn't require the hydrant, if the leasee decided to put a building on that new property, then a hydrant would be required. Public Works X Department Harbor Department X Police Department X `&V: Electric Department X Telecommunications I No resaonse Public Comment: Property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed platting action were notified of this public hearing. Public notice signs were posted on the property and all other public hearing requirements of Seward City Code § 15.01.040 were complied with. At the time of this publication the Community Development Department has received no public inquiries. If any correspondence is received after publication of this agenda statement, it will be presented as a lay down item at the Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Commission approve Resolution 2021-028, recommending City Council and Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval Of The Preliminary Replat Of Lot 4A-1 And Lot 41), Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, Creating Four Lots; Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A- 2, Lot 4A-3, And Lot 4A-4; Vacating The West 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 41), Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat, And East 10' Utility Easement Of Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Fourth Of July Creek Subdivision SMIC, Raibow Replat. 153 144 N. Binkley Street, Soldotna, Alaska 99669 • (907) 71.4-2200 • (907) 714-2378 Fax PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL FORM PRELIMINARY PLAT F-] REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT (no fee required) PHASED PRELIMINARY PLAT[] PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PRIVATE STREETS / GATED SUBDIVISION — all requirements of chapter 20, excluding 20.30.210 and 20.50 apply and must be met. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME: must be a unique name, contact staff for assistance if needed. PROPERTY INFORMATION: legal description Lot 4D and Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Raibow Replat Plat 2015-14 Section, Township, Range Section 18 T1 S R1 B SM, AK General area description Seward Marine Industrial Center SMIC City (if applicable) Seward Total Acreage 11.152 SURVEYOR Company: AK Lands, Land Surveying LLC Contact Person: Stacy Wessel mailing Address: 13521 Venus Way city, state, zip Anchorage, AK 99515 Phone: 907-744-LAND e-mail: aklands(oD_aklands.com PROPOSED WASTEWATER AND WATER SUPPLY WASTEWATERDonsite QCityDcommunity WATERDInsite R]CityDcommunity SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A preliminary plat application will be scheduled for the next available plat committee meeting after a complete application has been received. full size paper copy *,— reduced sized drawing (11 x 17) Preliminary plat NON-REFUNDABLE submittal fee 400 _RJJJAy Planning Commission minutes when located within city limits or Bridge Creek Watershed District 'certificate to plat for ALL parcels included in the subdivision ❑ Ocumentation showing proof of signatory authority (partnerships, corporations, estates, trusts, etc.) ,VSLL requirements of KPB 20.25.070 (see page 2 for checklist) and KPB 20.25,080 EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED TO PLATTING CODE: A letter, to be presented to the commission, with substantial evidence justifying the requested exception and fully stating the grounds for the exception request, and the facts relied upon, MUST be attached to this submittal. 1.20.30.030 2. 3. APPLICANT: SIGNATURES OF ALL LEGAL PROPERTY OWNERS ARE REQUIRED. Additional signature sheets can be attached. When signing on behalf of another individual, estate, corporation, LLC, partnership, etc., documentation is required to show authority of the individual(s) signing. Contact KPB staff for clarification if needed. OWNER(s) Name (printed): Norman Regis Signature: Dy; „Y�,9ne3 by Nmm RNI, N©rman Reg Date: 2021.To.7309:27:23-U'00• Phone: 907-224-4352 a -mail: nre is ci ofseward.net Name (printed): Signature: Phone: e-mail: Name (printed): Signature: Phone: e-mail: 154 CnA OrVlrF I ML nM1/l V Kenai Peninsula Borough Code Title 20 Subdivisions 20.25.070 - Form and contents required. The preliminary plat shall be drawn to scale of sufficient size to be clearly legible and shall clearly show the following: A. Within the title block: Not applicable The required to my plat. information has been shown/noted. 1. Name of the subdivision which shall not be the same as an existing city, town, tract, or subdivision of land in the borough, of which a plat has been previously recorded, or so nearly the same as to mislead the public or cause confusion; 2. Legal description, location, date, and total area in acres of the proposed subdivision; and 3. Name and address of owner(s), as shown on the KPB records and the certificate to plat, and registered land surveyor; B. North point, G. The location, width and name of existing or plaited streets and public ways, railroad rights -of -way, and other important features such as section lines or political subdivisions or municipal corporation boundaries abutting the subdivision; D. A vicinity map, drawn to scale showing location of proposed subdivision, north arrow if different from plat orientation, township / and range, section lines, roads, political boundaries, and prominent v natural and manmade features, such as shorelines or streams; E. All parcels of land including those intended for private ownership and those to be dedicated for public use or reserved in the deeds for the use of all property owners in the proposed subdivision, together with the purposes, conditions, or limitations of reservations that could affect the subdivision; F. The names and widths of public streets and alleys and easements, existing and proposed, within the subdivision; G. Status of adjacent lands, including names of subdivisions, lot lines, block numbers, lot numbers, rights -of -way; or an indication that the adjacent land is not subdivided; H. Approximate locations of areas subject to inundation, flooding, or storm water overflow, the line of ordinary high water, wetlands when adjacent to lakes or non -tidal streams, and the appropriate study which identifies a floodplain, if applicable; fJt 1. Approximate locations of areas subject to tidal inundation and the mean high water line; V J. Block and lot numbering per KPB 20.60.140, approximate dimensions and total numbers of proposed lots; K. Within the limits of incorporated cities, the approximate location of known existing municipal wastewater and water mains, and other / utilities within the subdivision and immediately abutting thereto or a J statement from the city indicating which services are currently in place and available to each lot in the subdivision; L. Contours at suitable intervals when any roads are to be dedicated Y unless the planning director or commission finds evidence that road'\ grades will not exceed 6 percent on arterial streets, and 10 percent on other streets-, M. Approximate locations of slopes over 20 percent in grade and if contours are shown, the areas of the contours that exceed 20 percent grade shall be clearly labeled as such; N N. Apparent encroachments, with a statement indicating how the encroachments will be resolved prior to final plat approval; and b. If the subdivision will be finalized in phases, all dedications for through streets as required by KPB 20.30.030 m"5be included in t`' the first phase. ALTERATION OF FLATTED UTILITY EASEMENT PROCEDURES BY THE PETITIONER(S) Some legally described and recorded utility easements are unimproved and not used. Under certain circumstances, some of these easements may be altered or removed. 20.65.010. Authority; Legislative intent; Scope. This chapter is enacted under the authority of AS 29.40. A vacation decision is a discretionary legislative land use decision. The purpose of this chapter is to establish procedures for the vacation of a platted public right-of-way, public area, or other public easement dedicated on a borough approved plat, and to provide procedures for the alteration, including removal, of platted utility easements. This chapter does not apply to easements or property owned or held by a city or the borough in their proprietary capacity which may only be extinguished through the terms of the controlling document or applicable law. This chapter does not apply to private easements. 20.65-030. Vacation Criteria. Vacation of a platted public right-of-way, access, area or other easement granted for public use or public benefit must conform to the requirements of this chapter and AS 29.40.120 through AS 29.40.160 as now enacted or as amended. 20,65.070, Alteration of platted utility easements. A. Where platted utility easements are reserved for the purpose of providing utility services by an agency or utility provider and are not dedicated to the public use in the same manner as public rights -of -way, public access, or public easement granted for public use, the planning commission shall review and act upon all requests to alter, including removal, platted utility easements. For purposes of types of easements covered by this section, the KPB 20.90.010 definition for Utility Easement controls. B. The petitioner shall include the following items when submitting a request to alter a platted utility easement. 1. A petition, provided by KPB Planning Department, signed by the owner of the land subject to the platted utility easement as shown on the borough tax rolls. 2. Comments from the city advisory commission if applicable, and the jurisdictional authority of a dedicated right-of-way when the utility easement adjoins a dedicated right of way. A petition to alter a platted utility easement will not be approved if a city with jurisdictional authority objects to the alteration. 3. Comments or non -objection from all appropriate utility providers. Affected utility providers must initial or comment on the same sketch or submittal that is provided to the borough. 4. A sketch showing the alteration of the platted utility easement. If the alteration of the utility easement is due to an encroachment, then an as -built survey or site survey must be submitted with the petition. 5. Appropriate application fee. G. Applicant statement containing the reasons for the alteration of the platted utility easement. C. Notice shall be sent per KPB 20.10.100. D. When the application is complete, the planning commission will take action on the requested alteration of the platted utility easement, either approving or denying the request- E. A planning commission decision under this section is final. A notice of decision shall be sent to the petitioner. No reapplication or petition concerning the same alteration to platted utility easement may be filed within one calendar year of the date of the final denial action except in the case where new evidence or circumstances exist that were not available or present when the original petition was filed. If the reasons for denial are resolved, the petitioner may submit a new petition for alteration of platted utility easement with documentation that the issues have been resolved, accompanied by a new fee. F. An appeal of the planning commission decision under this section must be filed in the superior court in accordance with the Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure. G. Approval of an application under this section expires in 12 months. H. Upon approval, the alteration of a utility easement can be finalized by either. I. Recording of a subdivision plat which complies with Chapter 20. 2. Recording of a utility easement alteration resolution. Upon approval of an alteration to a platted utility easement, not associated with the vacation of a right-of-way, not requiring transfer of title, or changing of boundary lines, a resolution may be adopted by the planning commission and recorded by the planning department within the time frame set out in the resolution to finalize the approval. The petitioner is responsible for the recording fees. The resolution will require an exhibit drawing showing, and dimensioning, the utility easement alteration area. The exhibit drawing shall be prepared, signed and sealed by a license land surveyor. fhb: Binkley Street, Soldotna, Alaska 99669 • (907) 714-2200 • (907) 714-2378 Fax PETITION FOR ALTERATION TO PLATTED UTILITY EASEMENT PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED Upon receipt of complete application with fees and all required attachments, a public hearing before the Planning Commission will be scheduled. The petition with all required Information and attachments must be in the Planning Department at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing date. By State statute and Borough Code, the public hearing must be scheduled within 60 days of receipt of a complete application. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A utility easement alteration application will be scheduled for the next available planning commission meeting after a complete application has been received. 0 non-refundable fee to help defray costs of advertising public hearing. ❑ Utility easement requested to be altered was granted by subdivision plat, filed as Plat No. 2015-14 in Seward Recording District. OR ❑ Comments from Electric Association attached. ❑ Comments from Gas Company attached. ❑ Comments from Telephone Company attached. ❑ Comments from Cable Company attached. ❑ Comments from KPB Roads Department attached. ❑ Comments from City Advisory Planning Commission (if located within a city). Copy of minutes at which this item was acted on, along with a copy of City Staff Report. ❑ 1 copy of the plat or map showing the utility easement to be altered. Must not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Area to be altered shall be marked clearly with cross hatching or other identifiable markings. ❑ If an existing improvement is encroaching into the easement, an As -Built drawing depicting the encroachment must be attached. ❑ Yes 21 No Is the utility easement in use by any utility company? If yes, which utility? ❑ REASON FOR ALTERATION The petitioner must attach a statement with reasonable justification for the alteration utility easement. Alteration of utility easement will be finalized by ❑ resolution R1 plat LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL CONTAINING THE UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE ALTERED: Lot 4D and Lot 4A-1, Block 7, Raibow Replat Plat 2015-14 Section, township, range Section 18, T1 S, R1 E, SM, AK City (if applicable) Seward General area SM IC owners of the parcel affected by the platted utility easement must sign the petition. Each petitioner must include address and legal description of his/her property. Attach additional signature sheets if needed. Submitted by: R1 Petitioner ❑ Representative Name (printed): Norman Regis SignatureNorman BC]IS o�,� �os,_,o,s,soa3s osao e-mail;nregis@cityofseward.net Address; Box 167 Seward, AK 99664 Owner of: Petitioners: Name (printed): Signature e-mail: Address: Owner of: Petitioners: Name (printed): Signature e-mail: Address: Owner of: 157 158 A I A% K A July 28, 2021 Mr. Norm Regis, Harbormaster City of Seward PO Box 167 1300 4th Street Seward AK 9966 Re: Additional Land for the Seward Shipyard Dear Mr. Regis: JAG Alaska, Inc. 3306 Sorrel Road PO Box 969 Seward, Alaska 99664 Phone: 907.224.3198 JAG Alaska desires to increase the foot print of its land lease at the Seward Shipyard in order to extend the existing rail system creating additional ship berthing and much needed additional employee parking that together will support increased annual volume of work that can be performed at the facility. I have attached a drawing as separate pdf file showing the additional land that JAG Alaska would like to include in its lease. Please note that the Sorrel Road right of way accessing the public beach near the shipyard main gate is being preserved. We understand that more detailed plat drawings and legal descriptions will be required for the actual lease documents, but wanted to get the discussion started with a simple sketch. Please let me know if you have comments regarding the proposed lease expansion. If, the proposed new shipyard lease boundaries meet with your approval, please advise on the next steps we will need to take to modify the shipyard lease. Sincerely, Doug Ward 907 617-4726 dward.ktn@gmail.com `&V AKLANDS October 12, 2021 Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission 144 N. Binkley St. Soldotna, AK 99669 Subject: Preliminary Plat -JAG Replat Seward, Alaska Greetings Lovely Commission Members of the Kenai Peninsula Borough, 13521 Venus Way Anchorage, AK 99515 (90) 744-LAND aklands@aklands.com aklands.com The City of Seward is creating four new parcels, Lot 4D-1, Lot 4A-2, Lot 4A-3, and Lot 4A-4 by subdividing Lot 4A-1 and Lot 4D, Block 7, Fourth of July Creek Subdivision, SMIC, Raibow Replat, Plat No. 2015-14, also known as 3305 & 3409 Morris Ave. Seward, Alaska in the Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC). The City of Seward is requesting an exception to KPB Platting Code 20.30.030 and the vacation of two 5-foot utility easements. Exception to KPB Platting code 20.30.030 The new subdivision is accessed by developed Tract A3 to the North (Morris Ave), East (Olga St) and Sorrel Road to the South. Tract A3 is a developed 60' wide service road access easement restricted to lessees, City and other authorized personnel. This easement serves as legal access for the Seward Marine Industrial Center. The City of Seward is the owner of this subdivision and Tract A3. Sorrel Rd is a platted 60 foot Right of Way to the South and varies in width to the west. Previous plats were approved with similar design. Vacate two 5' Utility Easements The City of Seward is requesting to vacate two platted 5-foot utility easements located at the West 5 feet of Lot 4D, and the East 5 feet of Lot 4A-1, Block 7 Fourth of July Creek Subdivision Seward Marine Industrial Center Raibow Replat. Said Lot 4D is expanding westward encompassing 40 feet, for a total of 210 feet. Said Lot 4D and Lot 4A-1 utilities are located along Morris Ave and Olga St. The City of Seward Electric, Water and Sewer GIS Application shows that there that are no utilities within the platted 5-foot utility easements. Granting the exception to KPB code and vacating the two 5-foot utility easements will provide the City of Seward with four new lots that facilitates creative development and economic opportunity. If you have any questions, feel free to call or email. ID3, Sincerely, AK Lands, Land Surveying, LLC by Stacy Wessel Professional Land Surveyor IN ------------------------------------ - F SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE PRELIMI( PLAT - ------------------- 'Ai7 ............ . ... ... . ----------- - ---------------------- - - -- - -- - -- - _ \) \ | � E � « v. A 1% City of Seward, Alaska October 19, 2021 CALL TO ORDER Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Volume 7, Page The October 19, 2021 regular meeting of the Seward Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Vice Chair Tom Swann. OPENING CEREMONY Commissioner Nathaniel Charbonneau led the pledge of allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL There were present: Cindy Eek! ,,, a presiding, and Tom Swann Craig Ambrosiani Vanessa Verhey Comprising a quorum of the Board; and Gary Seese Nathaniel Charbonneau Clare Sullivan Courtney Bringhurst, Acting Community Development Director Brenda Ballou, City Clerk Excused — None Absent — None Vacant — One Clerk's Note: Cindy Ecklund submitted her resignation on October 14, 2021, following the certification of the borough election wherein Ecklund was elected to serve as Seward 's Borough Assembly Representative. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT EXCEPT THOSE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING — None APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Motion (Charbonneau/Sullivan) Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda Swann removed Resolution 2021-021 from the agenda. Motion Passed Unanimous Approval of the September 7, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes. SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS 164 City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page Administration Report. Acting Community Development Director Courtney Bringhurst announced that Jason Bickling was hired as the new Community Development Director and would start on November 8, 2021. Other Reports, Announcements, and Presentations — None PUBLIC HEARINGS Resolutions Requiring Public Hearing Resolution 2021 021;F Of The -Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Sewar- §15.10.222 . This item was removed fi^om the agenda. Resolution 2021-022, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Granting A Conditional Use Permit To The Seward Police Department To Construct An Animal Shelter On Lot 6A-2, Fort Raymond Subdivision, Replat No. 3, Located At 601 Sea Lion Avenue; Within An Institutional (INS) Zoning District. Motion (CharbonneauNerhey) Approve Resolution 2021-022 Notice of the public hearing being posted and published as required by law was noted and the public hearing was opened. No one appeared and the public hearing was closed Bringhurst stated the police department had submitted an application for this Conditional Use Permit for the new animal shelter. She recited the terms contained in the agenda statement and recommended approval. Motion Passed Unanimous Resolution 2021-023, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Granting A Conditional Use Permit To Phil Zimmerman To Construct A 3-Plex And Two 4-Plexes On Lots 8, 9, 10, Block 4, Gateway Subdivision, Addn No. 1, Located At 2004, 2006, 2008 Phoenix Road; Within A Multi -Family (R3) Zoning District. Motion (Charbonneau/Sullivan) Approve Resolution 2021-023 Notice of the public hearing being posted and published as required by law was noted and the public hearing was opened Michael Craytor lived adjacent to the proposed lots and he had questions and concerns about this development. In recent years, a 12-plex had been built on the other side of his house, IRS. City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page and now this resolution was proposing a tri-plex on the other side of his home. He never envisioned this kind of development when he moved into his home. Sharon Stevens-Ganser was building a home across the street from this proposed development and her main concern was that there was adequate parking spaces, appropriate covered garbage receptacles, and appropriate lighting for the neighborhood. She also wondered what regulations there were for sidewalks, etc. for the safety of the residents. Phil Zimmerman was the developer, and said he had similar questions; he believed that sidewalk regulations were being included in the permit, as were garbage provisions and provisions for ambient lighting. He invited anyone to talk with him when they had questions. He intended to build mostly one bedroom apartments. No one else appeared and the public hearing was closed Bringhurst recited the terms contained in the agenda statement and recommended approval. Charbonneau stated there was a laydown provided for the parking plan, and that was helpful. He thought the drawings provided with the application were vague, though, and it would have been more helpful to see the landscaping plans. Sullivan wondered which party was responsible for installing sidewalks, whether it was the applicant or the city. In response, Bringhurst said she would have to refer to the original development agreement. Ambrosiani questioned what 12-plex was being referred to. In response, Bringhurst stated it was nearer to the Jesse Lee Home location, not immediately adjacent to this proposed development. Swann was confused about how the parking and traffic would work and if there was adequate room to allow for traffic flow. Seese said it appeared to him that there was adequate space allowed for parking and maneuverability. Motion Passed Unanimous Resolution 2021-024, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Granting A Variance To City Code §15.10.22 Development Requirements To James Protzman To Construct A Building With A Height That Exceeds 34' On Lots 37-40, Block 4, Original Townsite Of Seward Alaska, Located At 134 Fourth Avenue; Within A Central Business (CB) Zoning District. Motion (Verhey/Charbonneau) Approve Resolution 2021-024 Notice of the public hearing being posted and published as required by law was noted and the public hearing was opened. City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page Ristine Casagranda was surprised to see plans for a 50 foot building on this property. She did not own any property in the immediate area, and was speaking as a private citizen. She wondered if allowing variances such as this would open a can of worms. A 30-foot building in this location would block a lot of views, never mind a 50-foot building. She cautioned the commission to remember that the only legally binding aspects of a resolution were the sections, and not the whereas statements. Unless the commission amended in some binding language, there was nothing to prevent the owners in the future to allow nightly lodging. Jim Protzman stated his intention was for these units to be for permanent residences, and he intended to include this as a provision in Home Owners Association (HOA) agreement. The building he proposed to build was approximately eight feet higher than the original Arcade Building. No one else appeared and the public hearing was closed. Bringhurst recited the terms contained in the agenda statement and recommended approval. Verhey thought it might be prudent to include language in the sections to prohibit nightly lodging. Charbonneau was concerned with the proposed parking plan because parking spaces were stacked behind each other. Regarding fire safety concerns, the fire department's ladder truck was stored across the bay, a route which Charbonneau said he drove today and determined would take a minimum of 30 minutes to complete for the fire truck to respond. Sullivan stated the Alaska SeaLife Center had received a variance on the height restriction, and so was concerned that the commission may be in the position of picking and choosing who gets a height variance. She thought it should be a fair process. Ambrosiani echoed Verhey's concerns about adding a provision to disallow nightly rentals; he would be more comfortable with additional language being included. He thought the comment from the fire department in the agenda statement was vague, and wondered if the commission was being asked to grant a variance on behalf of the fire department. In response, Swann said if this 50 foot variance was allowed, the building construction would be required to meet the requirements of a 50 foot building; the commission would be granting a variance on the height of the building, not on the fire service provided. Seese did not oppose the height being requested. Swann noted that when the commission approved a variance, the commission was also responsible for setting conditions of the permit. He was less concerned with the parking plan because the parking was intended to be for residents. He did not believe the commission had the authority to prescribe the use of the building, whether it be long term residential use or nightly rental. Swann stated that this property in and of itself was neither special or unique, and in that City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page regard, perhaps did not meet the need for a variance at all. The Alaska SeaLife Center had very unique requirements for the height variance, due to the aviary. Regarding fire safety concerns, Swann said his impression was that the fire department was generally not concerned about height restrictions any longer. Swann believed it would be more appropriate to look at a change to the city code rather than approve a variance, as the topic of building height was growing to be more and more prevalent. Motion to Postpone (Swann/Ambrosiani) Postpone Resolution 2021-024 until after the commission can hold a work session. Ambrosiani concurred that the conversation about the possibility of changing code to increase height restrictions should be considered. Ambrosiani also wished to include a discussion in the work session about whether the city had the authority to dictate how the building could be used, specifically whether the city could prohibit nightly rentals at this location. Swann concurred. Motion Passed UNFINISHED BUSINESS — None NEW BUSINESS Resolutions Yes: Charbonneau, Verhey, Ambrosiani, Swann No: Seese, Sullivan Resolution 2021-025, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, Alaska, Recommending The City Council Amend Portions Of Seward City Code 15.10.140 Definitions, To Amend Definitions Related To: Apartment, Boarding House, Dwelling, Duplex, Unit, Hostel, Hosted Lodging Unit, Housing Unit, Insurance Company, Licenses, Listing, Listing Site, Lodging, Motel, Multistory Unit, Owner, Short -Term Rental, Short - Term Rental Transaction, Sleeping Unit, Townhouse, Transient, And Whole House Nightly, Amending 15.10.226 J Employee Campground, And Enacting Language In 15.10.226 K Pertaining To Short -Term Rentals. Motion (Sullivan/Charbonneau) Approve Resolution 2021-025 Bringhurst recited the terms contained in the agenda statement and recommended approval. Verhey thought it looked good. Sullivan noted the commission had been working on this since 2018, and she was pleased with it. Charbonneau was curious about the new definition for Owner; he thought the definition was more exhaustive than it needed to be. He was also concerned about the Employee 168 City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page Campgrounds definition under Land Uses Allowed, Item J, stating that the removal of the time restriction could potentially result in having employee campgrounds year round. Ambrosiani stated that the definition under Housing Unit for Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, appeared to be missing a full explanation of its use; comparing this definition to the others in the same section, this was less specific and contained no qualifiers or identifiers about its use. Ambrosiani went on to provide an example, saying other definitions specified the number of people allowed, and what kind of setting the facility provided such as dormitory. In response, Swann said Ambrosiani could make an amendment if he wished since this was his area of expertise. Ambrosiani requested that staff bring back some revised language for consideration because he was not qualified to say how one of these facilities worked, but he thought this definition should be crafted in a similar way to the others in this section. Charbonneau concurred with Ambrosiani. Ambrosiani, Swann, and Charbonneau all wondered why the definition for Group Care Home specified no more then five disabled persons. Sullivan stated that was language in the city code already, and they may never know the reason for specifying five persons. Charbonneau wished to learn if there was a reason for specifying five before making any changes to that definition. Charbonneau restated his concern about the definition of Owner. In response, Swann said that the definition of owner had been discussed quite a bit; a person could be officially on the record, but not be an owner. Swann provided examples, saying that a business could lease a building and be responsible for it, but not be the owner of record, or a property owner could authorize a manager to take care of their property. Regarding Employee Campgrounds, Charbonneau did not want to open up code to allow a permanent employee campground. Swann concurred, and was concerned that during all the work sessions that had been held, employee campgrounds were never discussed. Swann was specifically concerned that employee campgrounds might consist of tents, and keeping them up year round would look really bad. Swann stated for the last several years, the commission had been purposefully adding more restrictions on employee campgrounds, and this revised definition appeared to be a complete reversal of the commission's intent. Bringhurst clarified that in employee campgrounds, tents and RVs would be disallowed. Swann appreciated the clarification, but didn't believe it alleviated his concerns. Motion to Postpone (Swann/Charbonneau) Motion Passed Postpone Resolution 2021-025 until after the commission can hold a work session concerning the definition of Housing Unit and the Land Uses Allowed section for Employee Campgrounds. Yes: Verhey, Ambrosiani, Charbonneau, Sullivan, Swann No: Seese `GN City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page Other New Business Items Discuss holding the regular meeting on November 2, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. Bringhurst stated there were two Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) and one replat that had been submitted for the commission's consideration. The commission determined they would have a quorum and would hold the meeting on November 2, 2021. Discuss the topic for the work session on November 16, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.; suggested topic is "Continue Update and Review of *Land Use Table and Planning For Ground Truthing. " Bringhurst asked who would be present for this work session. Swann and Verhey would not be present. The commission set the topics for the work session, in order, as: Review building height restrictions in Seward City Code; Review the definition of Housing Unit and the Land Uses Allowed section for Employee Campgrounds; and, Discuss whether the city has the authority to dictate how a building can be used, specifically whether the city can prohibit nightly rentals. Discuss the meeting schedule for December and January. Swann stated he would be unavailable until early January, 2022. Verhey stated she would be gone through December. Ambrosiani stated he would be gone for part of December as well. By unanimous consent, the commission cancelled the December 7, 2021 meeting and the December 21, 2021 work session due to a lack of quorum. Swann stated he would not return in time for the January 4, 2022 meeting. Charbonneau stated he would not be available during the first week of January. By unanimous consent, the commission rescheduled the January 4, 2022 meeting to January 11, 2022. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS PAS Quick Notes Design Thinking 2021 Planning & Zoning Meeting Schedule City Calendars COMMISSION COMMENTS 170 City of Seward, Alaska Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 Volume 7, Page Sullivan thanked Bringhurst for her work. Charbonneau thanked staff and the public for coining out tonight. Ambrosiani thanked staff and the public for coming to the meeting. Seese said he had lived in Anchorage since 1964, and he observed that the building height restrictions there were due to the air traffic at Merrill Field; Seward didn't have that issue. He believed Seward should have high-rises. Swann thanked staff, and stated there would be election for chair and vice chair at the November 2, 2021 meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS Jim Protzman stated that building heights were typically not dictated by fire code, but by building codes. He said if the buildings in New York City were restricted by fire code, there would be no skyscrapers. The building he proposed to build was in keeping with building codes, and the tandem parking was in compliance with building code, as well. He said his building would be sprinklered as a fire safety measure. Regarding the HOA agreement, he intended to include restrictive language in the agreement to prohibit nightly rentals. Elizabeth Hooper wondered what the timeline was now for their variance to be finalized. COMMISSION AND ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS Bringhurst stated the November work session would lead to the Protzman variance returning to P&Z at the January 11, 2022 meeting. Swann stated the 34 foot height restriction had been in place in Seward for decades, and a lot of people would have something to say about changing it. He added that, based strictly on Protzman's variance request, the property was not unique and the building was not unique, and so he didn't believe it should be approved for a variance. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Brenda J. Ballou, MMC Tom Swann City Clerk Vice Chair (City Seal) `r` Memorandum Date: November 2, 2021 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Courtney L. Bringhurst, City Planner RE: Election of Chair & Vice Chair As you are aware, former Chair Cindy Ecklund was elected as the Borough Assembly Representative, leaving a vacancy for the Chair position in the Planning and Zoning Commission. Today's elections will be in effect through the remainder of the current term, ending February 2022. The Chair presides at the meetings and work sessions, and in the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair fills in as presiding officer. Below are guidelines you may wish to follow for the election of the Chair and Vice Chair positions. VOTING & APPOINTING PROCEDURE 1. The Presiding Officer opens the floor for nominations of Chair. 2. Any commissioner, including the Presiding Officer, may nominate one or more commissioner for the position. 3. If only one nomination is received, a motion is made to close the nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for the chosen person. That motion will need a second and can be approved by unanimous consent (no roll call is necessary). 4. If more than one nomination is received, paper ballots will be distributed for each commissioner to sign and vote for a nominee, or else the commission may conduct a voice vote. It takes four affirmative votes to be appointed. Once the Chair is elected, the same procedure is repeated for the Vice Chair. MEMORANDUM Meeting Date: November 2, 2021 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Courtney L. Bringhurst, City Planner Agenda Item: Review Directive from City Council to Discuss Amending the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in Central Business District BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: On February 22, 2021, City Council passed a motion to `Direct the Planning & Zoning Commission to review making a change to the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in Central Business District.' On March 2, 2021, that directive was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission by Jackie Wilde. On May 4, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission added the topic "Review the land use table in conjunction with light and heavy manufacturing definitions," to the work session topic scheduled for May 20, 2021. On May 20, 2021, Council member Liz DeMoss spoke as the council liaison to the Planning and Zoning Commission stating that one of the downtown businesses wished to do cannabis extraction. Currently, manufacturing was not allowed in the Central Business District, although some small manufacturers were operating, such as jewelry -making and candy -making. Chair Cindy Ecklund stated that they would review manufacturing in conjunction with the Land Use Allowed table in upcoming work sessions. CONSIDERATIONS Since the February 22, 2021 council meeting, when City Council directed Planning and Zoning to discuss amending the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in the Central Business District, the Planning and Zoning Commission has briefly discussed the topic in meetings, but has not been able to have a full work session to evaluate the topic. The Planning and Zoning Commission should decide how and when they want to address this directive from the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Commission discuss and deliberate. 173 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Meeting Date: February 22, 2021 To: City Council From: Council Member DeMoss Agenda Item: Discuss Amending the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in Central Business District BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: The City of Seward currently does not allow for manufacturing in Central Business District (CBD) per the Land Use Table in Seward City Code. A wide array of business can be conducted under the NAICS Line of Business 31— Manufacturing, including sewing clothing, food manufacturing, soap manufacturing, breweries, wineries, distilleries, retail bakeries, and jewelry manufacturing. Businesses have either already conducted business, are currently conducting business, and/or would like to conduct business under a manufacturing license in the Central Business District. To remain equitable and to respond to the needs of our business community the Land Use Table should be amended. INTENT: Direct the Planning & Zoning Commission to amend the current Land Use Table to allow for Light Manufacturing in Central Business District. CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No N/A Comprehensive Plan (document source here): Strategic Plan (document source here) Other (list): FISCAL NOTE: Approved by Finance Department: ATTORNEY REVIEW: Yes No RECOMMENDATION: N/A Not Applicable Direct the Planning & Zoning Commission to amend the current Land Use Table to allow for Light Manufacturing in Central Business District. 174 SCC 15.10.140 (52) Manufacturing, heavy. A use engaged in the basic processing and manufacturing of materials or products predominately from extracted or raw materials; or a use engaged in storage of or manufacturing processes using flammable or explosive materials; or storage or manufacturing processes that potentially involve hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions. (53) ) Manufacturing, light. A use engaged in the manufacture, predominantly from previously prepared material, of finished products or parts, including processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, packaging, incidental storage, sales and distribution of such products, but excluding basic industrial processing. `V& City ofSeivard, Alaska City Council Meeting Minutes February 22, 2021 WM Volume 41, Page 382 Motion to Amend Passed Unanimous Main Motion Passed Unanimous Other New Business Items Discuss Amending the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in Central Business District. DeMoss said a local business owner was interested in expanding his business to include manufacturing. Community Development had indicated that the Central Business District did not allow manufacturing: DeMoss said there were several examples of businesses that were already manufacturing in that zone, including soap making, t-shirt sereenprinting, jewelry making, and bakeries. McClure wondered why light manufacturing had been disallowed originally. DeMoss said she had researched and could not find an answer to that, but she knew of several other businesses who also would be interested in having light manufacturing businesses in.this zone. Osenga wondered if it would be better to ask Planning & Zoning to come back to -council with reasons why this light manufacturing should or should not be allowed. Motion (DeMoss/Baclaan) Motion Passed Direct the Planning& Zoning Commission to review making a change to the Land Use Table to allow Light Manufacturing in Central Business District. Unanimous Discuss and score the city manager candidates interviewed on February 11, 2021 and decide next steps. Terry suggested bringing up Janette Bower and Scott McClure to meet them in person for a second round of interviews and allow the public to meet them. Casagranda preferred all three be brought up. Baclaan, Osenga, and McClure wanted to see Bower and McClure. DeMoss wanted to see Bower. Motion (Terry/Casagranda) Motion Passed Invite all three city manager candidates to Seward for a second interview and a community meet & greet. Yes: DeMoss, Casagranda, Baclaan, Terry No: McClure, Osenga, Seese INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS `rc.: City of reward, Alaska Seward Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes ,'March 2: 2021 Volume 7, Page 446 APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Motion (Charbonneau / Swann) Approve the agenda and consent agenda Motion (Charbonneau /Swann) Postpone Resolution 2021-05 until. the April 6, 2021 meeting Motion Failed AYES: Hatfield, Charbonneau, NOES: Verhey, Swann, Ecklund Motion Passed Approve the agenda and consent agenda AYES: Charbonneau, Swann, Verhey, Seese, Eeklund NOES: none February 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes were approved on the consent agenda SPECIAL ORDERS, PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS Administration Report Jackie Wilde stated that the are two applicants for the vacant Commissioner seat, which will be heard at the March 8 Council meeting. Council will also be discussing a gated system for City parking lots and discussing restroom design options at Williams park. Wilde discussed upcoming Planning and Zoning Work sessions. Wilde called attention to a laydown item that was distributed to the public and council regarding the renaming of Dairy Hill Lane, and asked that Commission direct staff to bring forward a resolution to the April meeting. Wilde stated that atthe. February 22 Council meeting, Council requested that Planning and Zoning review a possible land use change changing marijuana extraction from heavy manufacturing to light manufacturing in the Central Business district. Other Reports, Announcements, and Presentations Wilde stated that she put together a proclamation recognizing Kelli Hatfield's service on the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be sending that to her. New Business Items requiring a Public Hearing Resolution 2021-02 of The Planning and Zoning Commission, of the City Of Seward, Alaska Recommending Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval of the Seward Original Townsite Marathon Replat; A Replat Of Lots 21-25 Block 38, Original Townsite Of Seward; Located at 600-608 Third 177 rI C'ily !if Seward, Alaska Seivad Planning & Zoning_ Commission Minutes . May 4, 2021 Voluste 7, Page 465 truthing exercise: the city would be divided up into sections so that each commissioner would be responsible fora portion. - Wilde pointed out that 95 was now redundant to # 1 and could be removed. Ecklund identified another typo in #7 Continuing and requested that "Working with PACAB..." be.changed to "Work with PACAB.. " in order to be consistent. Sullivan wondered what the expectation was for accomplishing the Short & Medium Terri objectives. In response, Ecklund said the commission should strive to accomplish the shout- and i' medium -term prio.ities by year end. Main Motion Passed Unanimous Other New Business Items Set work session topic for May 20, 2021 as `Continue review of the Municipal Land Use Plan r. and start review of the Land Use Table and Definitions." Ecklund wished to change to title of the work session to "Complete the Title 15 definitions and start the review of Municipal Land Use Plan''. 1. Wilde stated she had been asked by administration to include the additional topic of "Review the land use table in conjunction with light and heavy manufacturing definitions" to the topic, if possible. In response. Ecklund said P&Z would bring their recommendations to council of where they recommended light and heavy manufacturing should be allowed. k, In response to Ecklund. Wilde said on May 20, 2021 there would be a work session at 5:00 p.m. followed by a meeting to consider a replat. Start review of the 2014 Municipal Land Use Plan. Wilde wanted to be sure that citizens involved in the review of this plan; it would be an I extensive process to review the entire document. Ecklund wondered how long the document was; in response, Wilde said it was approximately 60 pages long. Ecklund said the plan included every city -owned property. The commission was responsible for conducting a review, obtaining public input. and providing a draft to council for approval. Ecklund said the commission. would begin working on the document on May 20, 2021 L Approval of the April6, 2021 Regular Meeting. Minutes. Motion (AmbrosianilCllarbonneau) Approve the April 6, 2021 Regular 3 Meeting Minutes. 1178 " City of &ward, Alaska :Seivard Planning x Zoning Commission Special Meeting Miruites Mrry 20, 2021 i ohane 7, Pa eG9 Wilde said the liaison for city council, Liz DeMoss, wished to speak tonight if the commission would allow. Wilde announced that Teryn Burnett had been hired as the new planning assistant and had started last Friday. Regarding the Jesse Lee Home Memorial Park, Wilde reported that contractors were back on site and working; June 24, 2021 was the expected date for having the demolition completed and: the grounds hydroseeded Brie section of the property would have a community garden, another section would have a dog park, and there would be a large open green area. Wilde hired local.. artists to create signs using portions of the old foundation, Some of the lumber from the Jesse Lee Home would also be used to construct an arbor at the Jesse Lee Home Cemetery. The animal shelter Request for Proposals (RFP) for design/build was on the street. There were already over 22 proposals released to date. The deadline was June 11, 2021 for submission, with the public opening would be held on June 14, 2021. Other Reports, Announcements, and Presentations Council Member Liz DeMoss spoke as the council liaison to P&Z. DeMoss said one of the downtown businesses wished to do cannabis extraction, the state considered cannabis extraction to be .manufacturing, Currently, manufacturing was not allowed in the Central Business District, although some small manufacturers were operating; these manufacturers included jewelry -making and candy -makings for example. DeMoss wondered if cannabis extraction could be defined as something other than manufacturing in order to allow this use. Wilde said she had : conferred with the fire department about light versus heavy manufacturing, and the state's definition appeared to hinge on whether hazardous materials. were being used or not. She added that if the cannabis operations were required to comply with International Fire Code, they could be considered as a factory l moderate hazard: Ecklund didn't believe that there were specific line items for jewelry making, candy making, soap making, or cannabis extraction on the Land Use Allowed Table; slie.added that breweries tell under restaurants. Ecklund said P&Z would be reviewing the Land Use Allowed Table in upcoming; work sessions: PUBLIC HEARINGS Resolutions Requiring Public Hearing Resolution 2021-013, Of The Planning And Zoning Commission Of The City Of Seward, :Alaska, Recommending Kenai Peninsula Borough Approval Of The Preliminary Replat Of Tract 'IF", Fourth Of July Subdivision, No. 2 Of Seward, Creating. Two Tracts To. Be Known As Tract "F" And Tract "G", Fourth Of July Subdivision, No. 2; Sawmill Replat Physical At 601 Nash Road. Motion (Swann/Charbonncau) Approve Resolution 2021-013 179 Climate -Resilient Pollinator Gardens Climate is changing at a faster pace than expected and many species are at risk of becoming extinct. At the same time, many communities around the country have unused, unkept open spaces. Planners can address all of these issues by incorporating pollinator gardens in open space planning and design, especially when working on community greening and green infrastructure (GI) projects. Installing pollinator gardens along with traditional GI strategies such as bioswales, permeable pave- ments, and green roofs creates additional benefits for ecosystems. Planners should treat the unused open spaces in their communities as assets and convert them into climate -resilient pollinator gardens to combat climate change and provide crucial habitat to wildlife. BACKGROUND A pollinator garden supports plants that supply nectar and pollen to a wide range of pollinators, includ- ing insects such as bees and butterflies and certain birds and animals. Eighty percent of crop plants, including fruits and vegetables, rely on pollinators to produce fruit and seeds. Plants that are native to a specific geographic area are often the best choice for pollinator gardens as they support native insects and pollinators. Native plants also have deeper root systems than nonnative plants, which allows them to provide additional stormwater management and water quality benefits. In May 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released updated climate change indicators that show that climate change is happening faster and becoming more extreme than 2016 metrics had estimated. A 2019 United Nations global assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services found that as many as one million plant and animal species are near extinction due to human activity. Planners across the country are using GI strategies to manage floods, prepare for drought, reduce the urban heat island effect, lower energy demands, and protect the natural environment.The use of native pollina- tor gardens in this work would enable them to provide a safe habitat for wildlife species, two-thirds of which reside in metropolitan areas. BENEFITS OF POLLINATOR GARDENS In addition to the primary function that pollinator gardens perform —supporting the pollinators that are essential to our survival —they offer the following benefits: • Climate resiliency: They enhance stormwater management with increased infiltration compared to other pervious surfaces.They also absorb heat and thus help to reduce the heat island effect. • Ecological health: They provide habitat to wildlife by providing food, water, shelter, and places to raise young, sustaining biodiversity in urban areas, which is critical to our food web. • Mental health: They provide nearby access to nature, which has a direct association with better mental health outcomes. • Environmental health: They help purify the air and water, improving air and water quality. • Aesthetics:They beautify the neighborhood as aesthetically pleasing places with flowering plants that bloom spring through fall. USE OF NATIVE PLANTS Gardens should contain a diversity of native plants for optimal environmental and wildlife benefits. Be- cause these plants have co -evolved along with other native insects and animals, there is a mutually ben- eficial relationship. Native plants also require less water for long-term maintenance, require no pesticides or fertilizers that could damage pollinator populations, and are better adapted to local contexts than nonnative plants used in traditional landscaping practices. Pollinator gardens increase climate resiliency and provide ecological, environmental, and health benefits. Credit: Sagar Shah 0 American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Creating Great Communities for All This PAS QuickNotes is made possible by a grant from Wildlife Conservation Society through the Climate Adaptation Fund. Support for the Climate Adaptation Fund was provided through a grant to Wildlife Conservation Society from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. A Publication oft he American PlanninUX)ssociation I PAS QuickNotes No. 96 Despite these benefits, native species are seldom included in GI practices. Planners can educate pub- lic- and private -sector actors about using native plants to maximize the benefits of open space. Use National Wildlife Federation's Native Plant Finder to search for the best native plants by zip code. SITING POLLINATOR GARDENS To maximize the ecological and biodiversity benefits of large areas of existing habitat, these areas must be connected by smaller areas of land that can support pollinators and wildlife. Planners can help create these wildlife/pollinator corridors by using spaces of any size in urban areas for pollinator gardens. Pollinator -friendly flowers and grasses can be planted at a range of scales, from small containers on a balcony to larger vacant lots. Curbsides and roadsides are other places where pollinator gardens can provide wildlife habitat. In recent years, the departments of transportation in several states have changed their roadside right-of-way management practices to encourage native plants along roadways. Similarly, curbside habitat should be encouraged in street design and standards. Other urban areas where planners can encourage or require pollinator gardens are private yards, parks, public spaces, rooftops, schoolyards, community gardens, and other places where GI strategies are used. By using these spaces, planners can create continuous corridors of habitat. ROLE OF PLANNERS There are several actions that planners can take to promote pollinator gardens and native species in their work. • Integrate pollinator gardens in GI solutions and projects. • Include native plan ordinances as part of subdivision regulations and local ordinances. Lower Makefield, Pennsylvania, amended subdivision regulations to require landscaping with 100 percent native plant species. • Amend landscape ordinances controlling weeds and vegetation to support pollinator meadows or prairie habitat. Austin,Texas, amended its landscape ordinance to support wildlife habitats. • Work with the appropriate municipal and county departments to identify and implement no -mow policies that restrict mowing in certain designated zones. Greeley, Colorado, adopted a no -mow policy to protect native grasses and natural areas. • Encourage wildlife/pollinator habitats in curbsides, roadsides, and yards through design guidelines, street regulations, site planning, and development review. Seattle has specific design guidelines for gardening in the planting strip and encourages pollinators in those gardens. • Support executive actions that mandate native plants. In Delaware, the New Castle County Execu- tive signed an executive order requiring the use of only native plant species in new or rehabilitated landscaped areas on county property, including parks and buildings. • Promote policies and strategies that support pollinator gardens and native plants in comprehen- sive, functional, and subarea plans. • Educate elected officials, decision makers, and allied professionals about the benefits of planting native species and collaborate with them to enhance biodiversity. CONCLUSION Combating climate change is essential, and using pollinator gardens to do so provides life -sustaining benefits in addition to ecological, environmental, and health benefits. Planners should actively consider pollinator gardens and native plants when working on GI -related projects, open space planning, site planning, landscape ordinances, and other plans, policies, and regulations. Pollinator gardens are an important tool that planners can easily adopt to enhance their communities, increase climate resiliency by reducing extreme heat and flooding risks, and achieve the GI goals of protecting natural ecosystems and conserving biodiversity. PAS QuickNotes (ISSN 2169-1940) is a publication of theAmencon Planning Association's Planning Advisory Service (PAS). Joel Albizo, Fame, cAr Chief Executive Officer Petra Hurtadc, Pho, Research Director, Ann Dillemuth, Aicv, Editor. (02027 American Planning Association, 205N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60601-5927, plonning.org. All rights reserved. APA permits the reproduction and distribution of PAS QuickNotes to educate and inform public officials and others about important planning -related topics. VI"sit PAS online at planning.org7pos to find out how PAS can work foryou. FURTHER READING Published by the American Planning Association Shah, Sagar. 2021."Combating Climate Change Through Vacant Lot Restoration." APA Blog, July 9. Shah, Sagar, Jen Mihills, and Samir Dalal.2021."Philadelphia Is Transform- ing Vacant Lots into Climate -Resilient Pollinator Gardens"APA Podcast, July. Shah, Sagar, Jo Pena, Jen Mihills, and Samir Dalal. 2021."Nature-Based Solutions for Creating Climate Resilient Communities"Webinar, APA Learn. Other Resources Aberg-Riger, Ariel. 2019. "What Cities Can Do to Help Birds and Bees Survive" CityLob, June 21. Wilk, Bettina, Veronica Rebollo, and Serene Hanania. 2019. A Guide for Pollinator-FriendlyOties: How Can Spatial Planners and Land -Use Managers Create Favourable Urban Environments for Pol- linators?Guidance prepared by ICLEI Europe for the European Commission. A Publication of the American PlannirWssociation I PAS QuickNotes No. 96 November 2021 December 2021 November 2021 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Oct 31 Nov 1 2 3 4 6 7:00pm P&Z Mtg 12:00pm PACAB m HPC (Regular Mt'g rk Session C7:OOpm Meeting) HPC ular Mtg 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .......... 7:00pm CC Mtg _. I T-NEO Trainin Online throucih AML HOLIDAY (Council Chambers) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AML Conference in Anchor qe AAM nference in Anchor ___ 6:00pm P&Z 12:00pm PACAB _._._........ Work Session Work Session (Council (Chambers)_ Chambers) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 HOLIDAY 7:00pm CC Mtg—1 ....... hamb..ers) 28 29 30 Dec 1 2 3 4 Council Calendar 1 10/20/2021 11:45 AM December 2021 January 2022 December 2021 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 91011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Nov 28 29 30 Dec 1 2 3 4 12:00pm PACAB Mtn 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7:00pm Cancelled 6:15pm HPC - P&Z Mtg Work Session (Regular (Council M.ee.ti.n.g)_._._._._._.. ......L.1 a rn b.e...rs_a...................... _._._._.. 7:00pm HPC Regular Meeting (Council .ham r 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12:00pm PACAB 7:00pm CC Mtg (Council Work Session Chambers) (Chambers) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6:00pm� 12:00pm HOLIDAY - P&Z Work HOLIDAY Session (Council Chambers) ..................... 26 27 28 29 30 31 Jan 1, 22 7:00pm CC Mtg _. 1chambersl_. Council Calendar 2 10/20/2021 11:45 AM January 2022 February 2022 January 2022 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9101112 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2021 22 23 24 25 26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Dec 26 27 28 29 30 31 Jan 1, 22 2 3 4 6 7 8 Holiday 7:OOpm (12:00pm PACAB Rescheduled - P&Z Mtg (Rescheduled _ to Jan 11) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 --------- 7:OOpm CC Mtg ...................... 7:OOpm P&Z _ 6:15pm HPC (Council Regular Mtg Work Session _Cha_mbers) (Rescheduled (Council from Jan 4) Chambers) 7:OOpm HPC Regular M.e...ti.n.g 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 6:OOpm P&Z 12:OOpm PACAB Work Session Work Session (Council (Chambers) Chambers) 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 7:OOpm CC Mtg (Chambers) 30 31 Feb 1 2 3 4 5 Council Calendar 3 10/20/2021 11:45 AM