The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04142022 Historic Preservation Work Session PacketHistoric Preservation Commission Work Session Packet I. TOPICS: 1) Review HP Priorities; 2) Review the process for Geographic Naming & Name Changes; 3) Continue to work on the Historic Business District Design Standards & Guidelines; and 4) Review and update the National Historic Preservation Month proclamation Thursday, April 14, 2022 City Council Chambers Beginning at 6:00 p.m. All public is invited to attend. HP PRIORITIES Sponsored by: Historic Preservation Commission Postponed: February 14, 2022 Amended & Approved: April 11, 2022 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2022-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, APPROVING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRIORITIES FROM FEBRUARY 2022 TO FEBRUARY 2023 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission's (HP) responsibilities in Seward City Code are: 2.30.425 - Powers and duties. (a) It shall be the responsibility of the historic preservation commission to: (1) Develop a local historic plan that will include provisions for identification, protection and interpretation of the area's significant resources. Such a plan is to be compatible with the Alaska Historic Preservation Plan and to produce information compatible with and for the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey. (2) Survey and inventory community historic architectural and archaeological resources within the community. (3) Review and comment to the state historic preservation officer on all proposed National Register nominations for properties within the community area. (4) Act in an advisory role to other officials and departments of local government regarding the identification and protection of local historic and archaeological resources. (5) Work toward the continuing education of citizens regarding local historic preservation and community history. (6) Support the enforcement of the Alaska Historic Preservation Act, AS 41.35. (7) Review local projects and recommendations about the effect on properties identified in the local historic preservation inventory. WHEREAS, at the December 9, 2021 and January 13, 2022 meetings, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and updated their priorities and goals for 2022; and WHEREAS, with the passage of HP Resolution 2021-001 on January 28, 2022, the Historic Preservation Commission requests council approval of their 2022 priorities from February 2022 to February 2023. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that: Section 1. The Seward City Council hereby approves the following list of Priorities `, CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2022-014 and Goals for the Historic Preservation Commission from February 2022 through February 2023: REPORTING • Quarterly reports to council • Annual Certified Local Government (CLG) grant report to the State Historic Preservation Office (February) PUBLIC OUTREACH • Coordinate efforts with Planning and Zoning regarding the identification and protection of local historic and archaeological resources. • Enhance understanding of the economic benefits of Heritage Tourism. • Celebrate National Historic Preservation Month in May by proclamation. • Award the Annual Seward Historic Preservation Award in May. • Maintain the Seward Historic Preservation Commission online presence. SEWARD HISTORIC STRUCTURES & SITES • Provide research about local projects and recommendations about the effect on properties identified in the local historic preservation inventory. • Update, review, and submit the Seward Inventory of Historic Sites to the Offices of History and Archaeology according to the guidelines for the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey, with annual review. • Promote and continue to nominate structures and sites to Seward Local Register. • Support the historic Hoben Park by assisting with planters and working towards restoring its historic character. • Provide research regarding the preservation and use of the Jesse Lee Home properties for Park use. • Identify the Most Endangered Historic Properties in Seward. SEWARD HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN • Provide historical preservation and education. • Develop historic preservation initiatives and projects. OTHER COMMISSION TASKS • Generate ideas, set priorities, and submit an application for consideration, and take action on CLG grant opportunities that stimulate knowledge of local history, 3 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2022-014 heritage tourism and cultural awareness. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 1 lth day of April, 2022. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ATTEST: THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Christy Terry, Mayor Casagranda, DeMoss, Calhoon, Osenga, McClure, Wells, Terry None None None Brenda J. Ballou, MMC City Clerk (City Seal) Sponsored by: Historic Preservation Commission CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2021-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, APPROVING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION'S PRIORITIES FROM FEBRUARY 2021 THROUGH FEBRUARY 2022 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission's responsibilities are listed in SCC 2.30.325 Powers and Duties; and WHEREAS, at its February 11, 2021 regular meeting, the Historic Preservation C"ominission (HPC) reviewed and approved their Priorities for February 2021 through February 2022; and WHEREAS, with the passage of the Historic Preservation. Commission Resolution 2021-002 on Fcbruary 11, 2021, HPC recommends City Council approval of the 2021 Historic Preservation Commission Priority List from February 2021 to February 2022. NONV. TH EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that: Section 1. The Seward City Council hereby approves the following list of Priorities and Goals for the Historic Preservation Commission from February 2021 through February 2022: ANNUAL REPORTING • Annual report to council r Annual Certified. Local Government (CLG) grant report to the State Historic Preservation Office PUBLIC OUTREACH • 0,-)ordinate efforts with Community Dcvclopnient regarding the identification and protection of local historic and archaeological resources • Enhance understanding of the economic benefits of Heritage Tourism • Celebrate National Historic Preservation Month in May by proclamation • Award the Annual Seward Historic Preservation Award in May ■ Improve the Seward Historic Preservation Commission online presence SE1V ARD HISTORIC: STRCCTURES & SITES ■ Review local projects and recomnzczidations about the effect on properties identified in the local historic preservation inventory • L;pdate, review, and submit the Seward Inventory of Historic Sites to the Offices of History and Archaeology according to the "Liidelines for the Alaska Heritage 5 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2021-026 Resources Survey, with annual review • Promote and continue to nominate structures and sites to Seward Local Register • Support the historic Hoben Park and assist with planters • Engender the preservation and use of the Jesse Lee Home properties for Park use • Track and monitor the prooress of the Fort Raymond Subdivision • Identify the Ten Most Enchuigcred Historic Properties in Seward SEWARD HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN dated 2017 • Promulgate economic incentives, historical preservation and education • Develop historic preservation initiatives and projects • Advance the Historic Overlay District OTHER COMMISSIOI< TASKS • Generate ideas, set pnorltics. rind sal?11111 fol' consideration, and take action on CLG grant oPl)ortllnitICS that stimulate krlow ledge of local history, heritage tourism and cultural awareness Section 2. This resolution shall take efrect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 22"a day of February, 2021. THI/CI'TY'OF` SENyARD, ALAS A. n /I risty ferry, AYES: C'asag=randa, McClure, DeMoss, Osenga, Baclaan, Seese, Terry NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: gone ATTEST: Airenda JIA. City W, , ,......,,,z (Ci SCVT SEAL 10. r r r 0 ; �. ti• rF Off' t"&*BOBS*.I' Ik Sponsored by: Historic Preservation Commission CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2020-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, ADOPTING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRIORITIES FROM FEBRUARY 2020 TO FEBRUARY 2021 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission's (HPC) responsibilities are listed in SCC 2.30.325 Powers and Duties; and WHEREAS, at their November 14, 2019 work session and January 9, 2020 meeting, HPC reviewed and refined their Priorities and Goals List for 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC" PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that: Section 1. The following list of priorities and goals for the Historic Preservation Commission from February 2020 through February 2021 is hereby approved by City Council: ANNUAL REPORTING • Annual report to council • Annual Certified Local Government (CLG) grant report to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) PUBLIC OUTREACH ■ Coordinate efforts with Planning and Zoning regarding the identification and protection of local historic and archaeological resources • Enhance understanding of the econoniic benefits of11crif(wo Iourisill • Celebrate l!'rrtional Hi.s�to)-ic- Vowli in Nii�ay by proclawation • Award the .'Ifamrcal Seward Historic Prc.sert ,wion :Ili and in May • Improve the 5cward i iistoric 1'rescr%�ition Commission online presence SEWARD HISTORIC STRUCTURES & SITES • Review local projects and recommendations about the effect on properties identified in the local historic preservatloIl lnvclltory ■ Review and update S('VVffl-eI1111 c taori• o Ili.storic Sites accordingto the guidelines for the Alaska Heritage Resources SLirvcy. Willi a1111ual rcvict\. • Annually submit inventory data to the Of liccs of'] listory and Archaeology • Promote and continue to nominate 5tructuic5 ,in([ sites to Seward Local Register n CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2020-019 • Support the 111storlc I-Ioben Park and assist \�-ith planters • Track and eValuate theJcs.sr l,c'c Ilona,, • Track and monitor the progress of tlic Fart Ra"t nzond Subdivision ■ Identify the Ten Most Endangered Historic Properties in Seward SE) ARD HISTORIC" PRESERN'A`I`ION PLAN (Updated 2017) Promote economic incentives, historical prescrG ation and education Promote historic preservation initiatives and projects Promote the Historic Overlay District OTHER C[7)► MISSION TASKS Generate ideas, set priorities, and submit an application for consideration for the CLG grant opportunities that stimulate heritagc tourism and cultural awareness Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 9`' day of March, 2020. THE CITY OF SEWARV, JLASKA i Cl Cluisty Terry, Mayor AYES: Osenga, Seese, McClure, Butts, Crites, Baclaan, Terry NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: BrcncPa .1. Ballo4, 's NIC City L li,•OF Sc ......• i rs� w" a �, fit° � • r SEA.][., r a OF �� .�•' 00"'4668 6s0s Sponsored by: Administration CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2018-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, REQUESTING THAT THE COUNCIL ADOPT THE 2018 SEWARD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRIORITIES LIST WHEREAS, according to Article 4 of the City of Seward Code, the Seward Historic Preservation Commission has been tasked with responsibilities; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include developing a local historic plan that will include provisions for identification, protection and interpretation of the area's significant resources; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include surveying and inventorying community historic architectural and archaeological resources within the community; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include reviewing and commenting to the state historic preservation officer on all proposed National Register nominations for properties within the community area; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include acting in an advisory role to other officials and departments of local government regarding the identification and protection of local historic and archaeological resources; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include working toward the continuing education of citizens regarding local historic preservation and community history; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include supporting the enforcement of the Alaska Historic Preservation Act, AS 41.35; and WHEREAS, responsibilities include reviewing local projects and recommendations about the effect on properties identified in the local historic preservation inventory; and WHEREAS, a priority list enables the Commission to continue to provide assistance to the Council; and WHEREAS, the Commission approved the 2018 Priority List on February 21, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Council and the Historic Preservation Commission met to discuss and revise the Historic Preservation Commission Priority List at the March 27, 2018 joint work session. CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2018-078 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA that: Section 1. The Seward Historic Preservation Commission 2018 Priorities List is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. Section 2. Seward Historic Preservation Commission 2018 Priorities List: Public Outreach • Coordination with Planning and Zoning- At least twice a year, the Historic Preservation Commission would like to meet with and coordinate activities and/or projects with the Planning and Zoning Commission (1) • Historic Preservation Web Presence - Further develop website content and presentation to reflect Seward's Historical Resources (2) • National Historic Preservation Month- Continue to participate and plan celebrations for the recognition of H.P. Month. The scope of the activities will vary from year to year (1) a. The month of May is Historic Preservation Month • Seward Annual Historic Preservation Award (1) a. The Historic Preservation award may be given in May b. Announce to the public the nominations the commission finds to be deserving of consideration to be a recipient of the award. Nominations should be received by mid -March c. Update City plaque reflecting awardees as appropriate in timely manner (1) • Local Historic Plants and Trees (2) a. Inventory of Local Historic Plants and Trees b. Request nominations from the Public • The First Friday Fireside Historical Lecture Series (2) a. Bi-yearly work session to brainstorm program ideas • Cemetery Information Project (2) a. Update Cemetery/Obituary Information on Seward Historic Preservation website and Past Perfect Database in collaboration with Resurrection Bay Historical Society Historic Structures, Sites, & Vessels (1) • Continue to update the Seward Inventory of Historic Sites • Continue to nominate Structures, Sites and Vessels to Seward Local Register • Monitor the Historical Jesse Lee Home Project • The Commission continues to support Historical Hoben Park's restoration and is willing to assist with planting the planters • Participate in city administration and community dialog concerning the preservation of the Fort Raymond - Historical Site and related artifacts 10 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2018-078 • Actively coordinate with state and local stake holders in initiatives encouraging preservation and regeneration of Seward Structures, Sites, Vessels and artifacts of historical significance, including the creation of a resource template to utilize the standardized historic preservation guidelines, to enhance and promote beautification of the Seward area with special attention to the Historic Districts Historic Preservation Plan • Seward Historic Preservation Plan (1) a. Promote economic incentives, historical preservation and education b. To enhance understanding of economic heritage tourism as a means for not only historic preservation but also for creating economic opportunity that will encourage a continued dedication to preserving the Structures, Sites, Vessels and artifacts that define Seward's heritage c. Promote historic preservation initiatives and projects as enumerated in the 2017 Historic Preservation Plan Other Commission Tasks • *Establish and maintain a basic working inventory of cultural resources in the local area, compatible with the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey and annually provide new data to the Offices of History and Archaeology (1) • *Survey and inventory community historic architectural and archaeological resources within the community (1) • Set priorities for CLG grant applications (1) a. Schedule annual work session to discuss future grant applications (1) High Priority (2) Ongoing *Required by City Code Approved February 21, 2018 by SHPC Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 24`h day of September, 2018. HE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA David Squires, Ma is CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2018-078 AYES: Seese, Towsley, Horn, Casagranda, McClure, Keil, Squires NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None BR 4re nn dd a: J7 . LRa-I I Qffu,'�M M C City Clerk (City Seal) ��..••��•.,, • SEAL 0 100 ;Ix •. �ti.•' tigTF OF nXVa: �"""Pa aa•a• 1 `K Sponsored by: Historic Preservation Commission CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2017-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, ADOPTING THE 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRIORITIES WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission wishes to assist the City Council with the ongoing responsibilities it holds as a Certified Local Government (CLG), which requires provision for recognition of the historically significant activities, structures and the people who helped build Seward; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the Historic Preservation Commission to assist with the continuing education of citizens regarding local historic preservation and community history; and WHEREAS, it is also the responsibility of the Historic Preservation Commission to assist with the preservation of Seward's local history; and WHEREAS, the Commission has continuously received Certified Local Government grants for historic preservation activities; and WHEREAS, the Commission provides recognition each year to an outstanding contributor to Seward's history by awarding the annual Historic Preservation Award; and WHEREAS, the Commission continues to revise the Historic Preservation Plan; and WHEREAS, in order for the Commission to continue to provide this level of service to the community and assistance to the Council, a long range plan for activities is necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Historic Preservation Commission met to discuss and revise the Historic Preservation Commission Priority List at the March 26, 2017 joint work session; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017 the Historic Preservation Commission passed Resolution 2017-002, their 2017 Priorities List; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission recommends the City Council adopt the 2017 Priorities List. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, that: 13 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2017-037 Section 1. The following List of Priorities is hereby adopted. Public Outreach • Coordination with Planning and Zoning- At least once a year, the Historic Preservation Commission would like to meet with and coordinate activities and/or projects with the Planning and Zoning Commission (1) • Historic Preservation Web Presence - Continual updating and work on website to reflect Seward's Historical Resources (2) • National Historic Preservation Month- Continue to participate and plan celebrations for the recognition of H.P. Month. The scope of the activities will vary from year to year (1) a. The month of May is Historic Preservation Month • Seward Annual Historic Preservation Award(') a. The Historic Preservation award may be given in May b. Announce to the public the nominations the commission believes deserve to be a recipient of the award. Nominations should be received by April. c. Update City plaque as appropriate in timely manner (1). • Local Historic Plants and Tree (2) a. Inventory of Local Historic Plants and Trees b. Request Nominations from the Public. • The First Friday Fireside Historical Lecture Series- (2) a. Bi-yearly work session to brainstorm program ideas • Cemetery Information Project (2) a. Update Cemetery/Obituary Information on Seward Historic Preservation website and Past Perfect Database in collaboration with Resurrection Bay Historical Society. Historic Structures & Sites (1) • Continue to update the Seward Inventory of Historic Sites • Continue to nominate structures, site's and vessels to Seward Local Register • Monitor the Historical Jesse Lee Home Project • The Commission continues to support Historical Hoben Park's restoration and is willing to assist with planting the planters. • Participate in city administration and community dialog concerning the preservation of the Historical Site — Fort Raymond Historic Preservation Plan • Seward Historic Preservation Plan- a. Promote economic incentives; historical preservation and education; enhance 14 1 1 1 CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2017-037 understanding of economic heritage tourism. b. Promote historic solutions as enumerated in the 2017 Historic Preservation Plan. Other Commission Tasks • *Establish and maintain a basic working inventory of cultural resources in the local area, compatible with the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey and annually provide new data to the Offices of History and Archaeology. (1) • *Survey and inventory community historic architectural and archaeological resources within the community. (1) • Set priorities for CLG grant applications. (1) a. Schedule annual work session to discuss future grant applications * Required by City Code (1) = HIGH PRIORITY (2) = ONGOING Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska, this 26t' day of June, 2017. THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Jf"an Bardarson, Mayor AYES: Casagranda, Keil, Squires, McClure, Bardarson NOES: None ABSENT: Altermatt, Slater ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Jf J hanua Ki , MMC ity Clerk ►.•...ara .•••' 'A OF S.F�,�,•.,�E (City Seal) • G%,.•Got�oR,q.9'P�• o z SEAL .a. •0 l '� •y�� •••...:.r••• c•4 4. 15 aayfas a•!f �` GEOGRAPHIC NAMING ,ll 4F1 di 0 U [u :7 0 3 dJ M uc Lrl da 0 CL V9 0 M Sd �J Vi C- 4 L ro A to W'I o rrdnJ � V -sz Lf e. bf w ill 2! 0�,Z vi fli u,J 0) {l ) n dd J V W a F- {� j X LU 4� V Lf5 � aJ to V dJ ` aj V) of m L+} 0 Q. 0 0_ C u SO i ai dJ ai LA t4 0 CL �4 0 Qj dJ aj dJ m E m �C C V dJ �h aj to.e di Lf} LA 4+ w di 0 • • • i� �u ai C.] I� 0 A � CS u +, q� ca Ln r < 4� 0 ° a U id Ed C L LM QJ N LO P Fi m w� LS} uy7 dJ 3 777 � e O M ry�y(U,i W � ' ypy a . a 9 C ~ Pd � t /}�} . .+. E 0 i 0 '4 . ,a 6' V 1 P4 L Lq U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Domestic Geographic Name Report I Use this form to recommend a feature name or to 3. On the reverse side of this form give 5. Return this form to: suggest a name change. information on the local usage and authority for recommended name. Executive Secretary for Domestic 2. For features on Federal lands, coordinate Geographic Names requests with the agency (U.S. Forest Service, 4. For more information about the Geographic U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service, Bureau of Land Names Information System or the National 523 National Center Management, etc.) For the administrative area in Gazetteer Program, contact the U.S. Board on Reston, VA 22092 which the land is located. Geographic Names at 703-648-4544.. Action Requested Proposed New Name: X Recommended Name: Unhghenesditnu Application Change: State: Alaska Name Change: County or Equivalent: Kenai Peninsula Borough Other: Administrative Area: Specific Area Covered: Latitude: 62 0 8 3 N Latitude: N Center: Section(s) 14 Tract A Township(s) 4N Longitude: -146 ° 26 , 44 ,, W Longitude: _ Heading End Range(s) 7W <, W Meridian Copper Elevation Type of Feature (stream, mountain, populated place, etc.): Stream Is the Feature identified (including other names), in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)? Yes No X Unknown If Yes, how is it listed? Description of feature (physical shape, length, width, direction of flow, etc.): The mouth of this stream is the ravine south of the Kalifornsky Village Site and runs west from across Kalifornsky Beach Road. Maps and other sources using recom- mended name (including scale and date). Alaska in Perspective 1983 ISBN 0-943712-14-9 Other name (variants) Maps and other sources using other name or application (including scale and date). N/A N/A Name information such as origin, meaning of the recommended name, historical significance, biographic data (if 18 commemorative), nature of usage or application, or any other pertinent information: Kenaitze Indian Tribe owns many parcels in the area around this creek. This creek has been identified by the proposed name of Unhghenesditnu in a 1983 publication written by the applicant. Literally name is unh 'farther' ghenes 'ahead, in front' di 'the one that' tnu 'stream.' Is the recommended name in local usage? Yes No X If Yes, approximately how many years? Is there local opposition to, or conflict with the recommended name (as located)? No conflict reported For proposed new name, please provide evidence that feature is unnamed: Stream is unnamed in USGS Map Viewer. Search of GNIS shows Unhghenesditnu as the Dena'ina name for the area but is not associated with the creek. Additional information: The proposed name is associated with the Kalifornsky Village site. Organizations for Consultation: Cook Inlet Tribal Council Kenai Peninsula Borough Kenaitze Indian Tribe Cook Inlet Regional, Inc. Department of Natural Resources Copy submitted by: Name (first, M.1., last) Title Phone (day) Date James Kari 907-978-9669 2/25/22 Company or Agency Address (city, State, and Zip) Alaska Native Language Center 1089 Bruhn, Rd, Fairbanks, AK 99709 Copy Prepared by (if other than above) Title Phone (day) Date Jacobie L. Schwenke NRS II (907)269-8749 3/14/202 Company or Agency Address (city, State, and Zip) Alaska Department of Natural Resources/Office of History and Archaeology 550 West 71 Ave., Suite 1310, Anchorage, AK 99501-3565 Authority for Recommended Name: Mailing Address and Telephone Occupation Years in Area iR1 Alaska Jfl perspective Joan M. Antonson, Editor This article i, :in example of using oral accounts and written records in historical research The methods enabled the author to learn the historN of a family and to undcntand the nanics given to sc-Ncral geographic places As a result scNcrtl geographic place names have Iven corrected. Memhcrs of the family are continuing to work prc%cr\ ing sites .signifi cant to their family heritage, oral traditions and writ- ten records. Kari, Jamcs Kalijnrnsky, The Crrlijorniiin From Cook IrtleUby James Kari 1 Kenai Peninsula. Alaska - History. 2 Kalifornsky - Family. 1. Title International Standard Book Number ISBN 0-94371 2-1 i-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may he reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information retrieval system without permission in writing by the publisher, except for short excerpts in reviews or scholarly works. 1J 1983 by the Alaska Historical Commission_ Printed in the (United States of America. 20 A -He Alaska i�r perspeetive Volume V 1983 Number 1 KALIFORNSKY, THE CALIFORNIAN FROM COOK INLET by James Kari This is the stop of a discrepancy in names. There is an abandoned Indian village located on the Kenai Peninsula adjacent to Gook Inlet, about two miles north of the Kasilof River mouth that appears on U.S. Geological Surve} maps as "Kalifonsky." It is named after its founder, a Dena'ina (T:anaina) Athabaskan, Nikolai Kalifornsky Ilis Russian surname means "the Californian;' and was given to him because he jour- neyed to Fort Ross, California, as a sea otter hunter for the Russians from about 1812 to 1820 The name Kalifornsky is significant hecause it demonstrates that sonic Alaska Athabaskan Indians were present at the I'ort Ross colony in addition to Aleuts, and because it a:munemorates both the Dena'ina and the Russian heritages of Cook Inlet. Un- til recently these historical associations were not widely know n because the place name was mis- spclled in 1916 on a map prepared by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Dropping the "r" from Kalifornsky renders the name meaningless. The vil- lage site and a small cemetery arc located near )Mile of Kalifonsky Beach Road — a place name derived in 1958 from the misrecorded village name. A pro- posal to change the village name Kalifonsky back to Kalifornsky was submitted to the Alaska State Board of Geographic Names in October, 1976. and the change was approved in December, 1981, following a lengthy campaign. The Dena'ina are a particularly distinctive Athabaskan tribe because of the ecological diversi- ty of their language area. 'Ibday four dialects of the Dena'ina language are spoken by about 150 people One dialect, that spoken by Nikolai Kalifornsky, is spoken by Dena'ina whose ancestors lived along Outer Cook Inlet and Kachcmak Bay. The Outer In- let Dena'ina arc the only Northern Athabaskans who lived on the Pacific Occan. 'there they hunted beluga wvhale, seal, and sea otter, and gathered shellfish in the intertidal zones often using Eskimo technology. In historic times their territory included villages of Kenai, Kustatan, Polly Creek, and Scldovia, as well as Kalifornsky. Currently the Outer Inlet dialect is spoken by fewer than ten persons. On the Kenai Pen- insula the only two speaker, of this dialect are Fedo- sia Kalifornsky Sacalc:)ft, 61, and Peter Kalifornsky, -1, (if Kenai, who are great -great-grandchildren of tite first "Californian:' Peter, who is a writer of his language, is the Last living person barn at Kaliforn- sky village. A great-grandson, and another speaker of Outer Inlet Dcna'ina, is Sergei Californsky, 7O, of 'lyunek. Paul Californsky, 61, another great great grandchild, lives in Anchorage. I he three other dialects are also very distinct geographically and culturally. The Upper Inlet area was occupied by several bands of Dena'ina. Their modern villages are 'Ivonek, Knik, Eklutna, and several abandoned villages on the Susitna River. These people used the sea seasonally and hunted t.artbou in the uplands. On the west side of Cook Inla_t, the Alaska Range bisects the Dena'ina language area On the north shore of lake Iliamna is one group. They seasonally used Cook Inlet. Another group. the Inland dialect, occupied the area to the north. In the villages of Nondalton and Lime Village, on the west slopes of the Alaska Range, are descen- dants of these nomadic hunters. They lived the typical life of the Athahaskans of Alaska's Interior. A system of trails through the Alaska Range linked the Dena'ina of the Interior with their relatives on Cook Inlet. Q The history of the Cook Inlet area is fascinating For 2.000 or more years Cook inlet was inhabited by Eskimo -speaking peoples.2 :\t some time in the past 1.000 to 5.000 years the Dendina Athabaskans entered the Cook inlet basin from the west, probably in two distinct phases. First a band entered the Up- per inlet through Rainy Pass, Later another band entered, probably through Merrill Pass to Kustatan and then across to the Kenai Peninsula Still Leer, perhaps just prior to Russian contact, members of this band moved south to Kachemak Bay.;'I'he Rus- sians colonized Cook Inlet, establishing their first post, Fort St. George, at Kasilof in 1-8- Americans followed after the purchase of Alaska in i867. In 1812 the Russians established a colony at Fort Ross, north of present-day San frulcisco, as a base for sea otter hunting and agriculture. Most accounts of the Fort Ross colony identify the Alaska Natives there merely as "Aleuts:' Actually the Aleuts were two distinct linguistic groups: the Aleut -speaking people from the Aleutian Island.., and the ,Vutiiy -- Koniag or Chugach Eskimo — people who arc list) known as Aleuts. With the addition of sonic Atha- baskans from Cook Inlet, the Alaska Natiycs at fort Ross were diverse in ethnic composition. The Rus- sians occupied Fort Ross until 1841 The story of the man called Kalifornaky has been passed down through the Kalifornsky family Ac- counts of the family"s stony have been written h} \Mullin (as told by the late Nlary Kahfornsky Nissen) (19 11), Peter Kalifornsky (1974). ilanke (19T9). Kari (1979), and the story by Peter Kalifornsky included with this paper. According to the late Miry Kiliforn- sky Nissen and Peter Kalifornsky, their great -great- grandfather worked at Fort Ross some time between 1812 and 1821. He was a Dena'ina Indian from Shk'ituk't village near modern Kenai. His Indian name was Qcidanrilchen, which means "bounce, up and out," or "he who is alert." Upon nadeinalchen s return to Alaska from Fort Ross he was known as Kalifornsky which is Russian for "the Californian" During Kalifornsky's absence his father, w ho had been chief, had died Upon his return, K:tlifornsky declined to succeed his father as chief and Icft Shk'ituk't to establish Ill, own village at the sm.tll creek known as Unhghenesditnu that mean, '-the) furthest creek over" '1 he Russian; called the illage Fsriiirorn ky for it, founder. KalifornskN was known around Crook inlet for hi, travels and for hi, .tcceptancc of the Russian Ortho- dox faith. ,Mary Kalifornsky Nissen gave the follow- ing account of his later life This reinarketble incin survived ri smed1po-y epidentic in Ili M 18 it). ichich clettnied the lines of rtbout half the Inlet's population, rind ulttm(ttely lived i'dinost a (enturv. As he held been the first child. bisgreat gl-,I td- son, Alexsu-y A'(ilift)rnsk,y, ivii.N to become the lcist child in the cn'eet to be born iinder the Russiem flag Just prior to the hotsting of the Americein sicindeird in October. 186-1 With the birth (J .1ho-y s frither, Aicoli, on 31a)' 19 I88 /. fire [Cic/generrl- tions of the %emir!), were livhkat ti(tlifort!- sky I illgge After i nlct seycrd nicmhcrs t)t the Kalifornsky fancily in 19-2, w hen I hcgan working with the De. na'ina language, i hecanic Interested in confirming Dcna'itta presence at ill(.- 1-ort Ross colony- and lo- cating nineteenth Lentur\ rcrords 111.1t document the family name and the place na mc- K.difontsky. At first I could find no records prior to 1916 w hen the site was recorded as Kahlonsk\ hN a I s ( oast and Gco- detic SUrycy mapping p.irt\ Donald J Orth, in his Dictionarr(j4laskciPluce \wnes(19-1)speculated that "Kalifonsky may he derived from the 'Kali (fisherman)' clan' s Peter Kalitornskc refutes this: the word k'kaletyl. "fish t.til clan;' is simply similar to tine anglicized place name Additional informatism about the Dcna'ina wvas found in records kept h} Russians Dcn:Mina, known to them as the Kenaitrc, trided at carious pots ear- h In the Russian a,loniai period \C hilc at �Nitka in 1805, Mkolai RC%aiU)\ recorded it yocabulary from .I Kenai Dcna'ina 11 Dcna'ina presence at Fort Ross was confirmed in a Dcna'In:i \oe:IhuL•tn collected by the Russian mining engineer Pcir Doroshin, who resided in Kenai hct�yccrn IR 18 :utd 1855 Amidst Doroshin s list of 19 Dena ma n.uncs fOr neighbor- ing peoples is a nano for ( alifoinvi Indians' This Is given in German and Dcn.i'ina .n he n-ohner eine c wrwmen himles, " dw cllers tit a warm Lind,— and in Demi'ina as Ktinah),igi<rlcitt,i Petcr K tlifornsky rewrites this namc as ynrlytsh /it tutu The 18 other tribal moues in the list arc for n.uo c groups in :Alaska. Apparently the name w.Is rcportcd to Doroshin b� a Dcna'ina who had actual contact w ith ( alifornia Indians, prohahly it the fort Ross colony. Another shred of widener concerning r)cna'ina at Fort Ross c:inic from a study of loan words in the Dena'um language and :1 comparison of loan words in the K.tshaya Pomp 1.Ingu:Ig(-'' I he Kashaya Porno W N Y pj.lr a .. r , ilk It C7 Y a r e Ln Lot k 23 Department of Natural Resources AL.ASKA HISTORICAL COMMISSION 550 Test Ah Aw nue. Sine 1310 Anchorage. Alaska 9950i 907.269.8700 dnr cha@odaska g-,+ ALASKA'S GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a program of the ALASKA HISTORICAL COMMISSION The Alaska Historical Commission serves as the geographic names board for the State of Alaska (AS 41.35.350). The citizen board, chaired by the Lt. Governor, reviews names proposed for lakes, streams, mountains, and other physical features in the state. The commission coordinates its program with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. The commission has established a process to consider proposals, as has the federal board. It takes at least a year to name a geographic feature. In 1982 the State of Alaska enacted a law urging the state geographic names board to consider Alaska Native place names for geographic features in the state that have not previously been named, using Native language writing systems accepted by the Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The U.S. Board on Geographic Names has a policy to identify a single official name and spelling for each geographic feature. One or more variant names can be identified if needed for clarity or reference. A variant is any current or historic name or spelling for a geographic feature other than the official name. It might appear on maps in parentheses following the official name. To propose an official name for a geographic feature, an application is made to the Alaska Historical Commission. The form is available at: ham://www.dnr.alaska.gov/Assets/uploads/DNRPublic/parks/oha/designations/AKgeographicnamg app.pdf or from the Office of History & Archaeology, 550 West 7' Ave., Suite 1310, Anchorage, AK 99501, 907.269.8721. The complete application and supporting material should be mailed, delivered to the office, or sent by email to dnr.oha@alaska.gov. All proposals must be accompanied by a map showing U.S. Geological Survey information and identifying clearly the feature to be named. Additional maps are encouraged that show the immediate area around the feature to be named, or show the feature in relation to major geographic features, communities, and roads as appropriate. Photographs and other identifying aids are useful but are not required. Evidence of local support is encouraged. These might be letters, petitions, newspaper articles, and letters to the editor, showing public awareness and endorsement of the proposed name. The proposer must establish that property owners of the feature or close to it have been made aware of the name proposal and given a chance to comment. 24 GUIDELINES In the review of a proposed name, the Alaska Historical Commission uses the following guidelines and the policies of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (Principles, Policies, and Procedures for Domestic Geographic Names, http.://oeonarnes.us2s.Rov/domestic/policies.htm). A proposal must identify the type of proposed name from the categories below, address the special conditions, and establish why the feature needs an official name. Local usage Active local use is the single, best reason to name a geographic feature. Local usage refers to a name for a geographic feature that has evolved over a period of years, is called that name by the community or area as a whole, and is supported by local petitions, oral histories, documents, or other publications. A feature named by the applicant is not considered local usage, even when the applicant has called the feature by that name for a number of years. The Alaska Historical Commission encourages the proposer to: include evidence of common verbal or written usage of the proposed name, such as petitions signed by local residents, resolutions, or letters of support for the proposed name from local government entities and community groups Descriptive names (includes features named by applicant) The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish that: the name is relevant and descriptive of the feature the name is not in use elsewhere in the region (unless for a related feature) the name is in good taste and not frivolous the name has been used for a minimum of five years and evidence is provided of the use the property owners of the feature and those living adjacent to it have been notified of the proposed name and given a chance to comment on it Alaska Native names The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish that: the name is or was in common local use and that use is documented the name is linguistically appropriate to the area in which it is to be applied the land owner has been notified of the proposed name and given a chance to comment on it there has been consultation on the spelling and use of diacritical marks (special marks not normally used in the English alphabet) with all Native groups in the area and with the Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks W Commemorative names (please read the special section) The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish that: the individual has been deceased for five (5) years and evidence of this (such as an obituary and biography) is provided the individual made a significant, acknowledged contribution over time to the community o state the individual had a direct association with the feature for a period of years there is local support by residents and local authorities as evidenced by including letters, petitions, and resolutions Historical names The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish that: the proposed name was in common local use and that use is documented the name is clearly associated with the area Name changes The Alaska Historical Commission is reluctant to change existing names, but will consider doing so if the proposer demonstrates a compelling reason and if there is local support for the change. It has been shown that changing long-standing names can cause confusion and unforeseen costs. The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish, as appropriate, that: the current official name is derogatory to a racial, ethnic, gender, or religious group the current official name is duplicative and causing confusion the current official name is not spelled correctly there is extensive local support by local authorities and residents for the name proposed and the name change as evidenced by letters, local petitions, and resolutions from local government entities and organizations the property owners of the feature and adjacent to it have been notified of the proposed name and given a chance to comment Names in wilderness areas (including wilderness study areas) The Alaska Historical Commission does not approve names for natural features in federally designated wilderness areas or study areas unless the proposer demonstrates that an exception is warranted. The Alaska Historical Commission asks the proposer to establish that: 3 `C there is an overriding need to name the feature (such as for purposes of safety, education, or area administration) the land manager has been consulted and provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed name Associative names The Alaska Historical Commission accepts, in fact encourages, using the same name for features related to each other, such as forks of a river or a creek that comes from a glacier. The Alaska Historical Commission asks to proposer to establish: the relationship between the two features using maps the property owners of the features and those adjacent to them have been notified of the proposed name and given a chance to comment the provisions for descriptive, commemorative, Alaska Native, wilderness and other categories are addressed as well COMMEMORATIVE NAMES A commemorative name of a geographic feature is to honor and recognize an individual who has made an outstanding or noteworthy contribution to an area or the state, or is a national or international figure. A commemorative name might be for an event. A commemorative place name is not intended to memorialize a family member, friend, pet or animal. Proposals containing a given name (first or last) or nickname of an individual are considered commemorative The full name of a person as part of a geographic name normally is not approved unless surname use alone would be ambiguous. The person must have been deceased for at least five (5) years before the Alaska Historical Commission will consider a commemorative name proposal. An obituary or biography of the individual must be part of the proposal. The information should establish the individual's direct association with the feature, and that the individual made a significant contribution to the area in which the feature is located. Direct association. To commemorate an event, it should have occurred at or near the feature or have had an impact on the region or state. To commemorate a person, the individual should have been physically present at or near the feature for a number of years, or engaged in some activity that affected the feature. A person's death on or at a feature, such as a mountaineering accident or plane crash, or the ownership of land adjacent to or of the feature, and recreational use or visits to a feature do not normally meet this criterion. Significance. The proposer must establish why the event or individual is particularly worthy of recognition. The importance of an event can be in the social, political, economic, scientific, or cultural areas. The contribution of an individual must be notable, of consequence, and have had an impact on the community, 4 27 region or state. A significant contribution is an extraordinary effort, achievement, or impact. It may come from the individual's work, professional or civic activities, and can be in the social, political, economic, scientific, or cultural areas. The contribution should have benefitted Alaskans beyond the individual's immediate circle of family and friends. Generally, these individuals will have been recognized through a letter of thanks from the Governor or Legislature, certificates of appreciation from an agency or group, awards, newspaper articles featuring the contribution made, dedication of local man-made features (park, street, garden, building), and the like. The individual might be a historical figure. Features in Alaska can be named for events of significance nationally or internationally. Features also can be named for persons who made a significant contribution nationally or internationally, especially if the contribution was exceptional and unique. In such instances, the requirement of direct association does not need to be met, but the other requirements for commemorative names must be met. Commemorative name proposals must demonstrate local residents have been advised of the proposal. Proposals should include evidence of local support by local authorities and residents attesting to the individual's association with the feature and significant contribution locally, to the state or nation, or internationally. GEOGRAPHIC NAMING PROCESS Upon receipt, a name proposal is reviewed for completeness. If necessary, the applicant is asked for additional information. Of particular concern is that adjacent land owners have been advised of the proposed name and had a chance to comment on it. A Domestic Geographic Name Report (a U.S. Board on Geographic Names form) is prepared and sent with a map and supporting information to relevant Native groups, public land managers, local governments, and other interested parties and local media for comment on the proposed name. For proposed Native names, the Alaska Native Language Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks is consulted. Interested parties might include local civic groups, historical organizations, pilot associations, and outdoor groups. The Alaska Historical Commission members receive the report, map, and all public input before discussing and acting to approve or not approve a proposed name. The nine -member commission meets at least two times a year. Commission members reference these guidelines in their formal action. The applicant is notified of the meeting at which the commission will consider their proposed name and provided with copies of comments received from reviewers. Every meeting has a public comment period when an applicant and others interested in the proposed name can address commission members. Place names approved by the Alaska Historical Commission are official for the State of Alaska. Following the meeting, applicants are notified in writing of the Alaska Historical Commission's action on their proposal. Unless tabled, the Domestic Geographic Name Report, all comments received, and record of the commission's action are sent to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Staff there also have a review process before the board considers and votes on a proposed name. The USBGN is the final word on choice, spelling, and official use of the place names in the U.S. Its approval makes a name official nationally. The name is entered in the Geographic Name Information System (GNIS), http.:HEeonames.us�s.gov/domestic/. When a 28 federal map is revised and updated an effort is made to add the name, but approval does not guarantee a name will appear on USGS and other federal maps. The Alaska Office of History & Archaeology has a program manager for geographic names who can answer questions or provide additional information. [AHC adopted 12.8.2015] [Link updates 04.05.2017] THE STATE ASKA Department of Natural Resources DIVISION OF PARKS AO�L ND OUTDOOR RECREATION Office of History & Archaeology GOVERNOR MIKE DUNLEAVY 550 West 7" Avenue, Suite 1310 Anchorage. AK 99501-3561 907.269-8700 http://dnr.olaska.gov/parks/oha March 15, 2022 Kenai Peninsula Borough, 144 North Binkley St, Soldotna, AK 99669 Dear Kenai Peninsula Borough Members, The Alaska Historical Commission has received a geographic name proposal to name a previously unnamed creek to Unhghenesditnu Creek. A copy of the proposal is enclosed for review, as well as a map showing the feature's location, and the guidelines for geographic names the Alaska Historical Commission members have. established. The commission would appreciate your comments on the proposed name. To object or to endorse the proposed name, you must respond in writing. Your comments need to be received by April 15, 2022. You can respond with a letter or by writing your comments in the box below. Please send your comments by mail to the address above or by email to dnr.oha@alaska.gov. If you have any questions please contact Katie Ringsmuth at email katie.ringsmuth@alaska.Rov or by phone at 907.269.8714. Sincerely, Katherine Ringsmuth Geographic Names Coordinaror and State Historian Enclosures I object/ endorse the proposed name because: Signed: Date: 011 HISTORIC DISTRICT STANDARDS & GUIDELINES Mi 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Introduction Historic preservation of buildings, neighborhoods, sites, landscapes, and other historic properties can add to a community's understanding of, and pride in its history, and bring economic and other benefits as well. Therefore, it makes sense to encourage the preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration of historic properties (University of Kansas, 2022). A community that respects its history respects itself. The preservation of that history through the preservation of sites important to it can help a community realize its strengths and use them to improve the lives of all its residents (University of Kansas, 2022). Historic preservation in any community is a group effort, that is only possible with the support of policy makers, businesses and developers, and/or the community at large. Together, we will either maintain the special unique character and quality of life that residents and visitors love, or we will let it slip away. Many communities that have not stepped up to the challenge have lost most of their unique character to urban sprawl. With it has forever gone the charm that visitors and locals once loved, and the economic opportunity for heritage tourism. Seward is one of the few places in Alaska along the road system that still has its unique Alaskan character, because of the historic character of our downtown area. Seward was the Gateway to the rest of Alaska, which was the vision of our founding fathers. Considering the effect, the 1964 earthquake had on Seward and Alaska, the surviving historic buildings are even that much more precious. Historic preservation is usually encouraged through carrots and sticks. The carrots, or incentives , such as grants, are offered to offset some of the costs. These are usually in concert with regulations (sticks) that require certain kinds of preservation activities in particular situations (historic districts, properties with historical or architectural significance, etc. (University of Kansas, 2022). In Seward, incentives such as grants are available from many sources. There are no regulations, and preserving your historic building is entirely voluntary. It is easy to do, but just as easy not to do. Even The National Register does not restrict a property owner's private property rights. Owners of National Register properties can remodel, renovate, sell, or even demolish their property with no restrictions. However, significant modifications may result in removal from the National Register. The federal government does regulate alterations to historic properties where federal funds have been invested. If you have not received federal grant funds or federally sponsored tax benefits (grants, tax credits, etc.) then you have no federal restrictions as a homeowner. The same applies at the state and local level. If you have received state or local funds or tax benefits to preserve your historic home, then you may be subject to design review for any alterations. City governments may regulate National Register properties through a local historic preservation ordinance or zoning. At this time, the City of Seward has no ordinances or zoning that regulates historic properties. Every historic structure in town could be bulldozed down tomorrow, as allowed by the city regulations. If you are reading this, it is likely that you want to maintain or rehabilitate your historic property, to maintain the beauty and character of your home or business, your neighborhood and our community. You would like to know how, and if you can afford it. Or you may be planning to build something new in a historic neighborhood and would like to fit in and enjoy the benefits of living in a unique area. Introduction Kea 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit This document can assist you by showing you how to get the historical look, even while using modern materials. Why Here, Why Now? Seward has a vibrant history that spans several generations and is reflected in the many historic structures that survived throughout the community. The Downtown Historic District, in the heart of Seward, has a diverse range of older buildings that provide visual interest to residents and visitors and stand as symbols of the community's role in the development of South -Central Alaska. This includes the first bank in the State located in Brown and Hawkins and the Government Cable House which significantly reduced communication times to the lower 48 states. Seward is also Mile 1 of the Iditarod Trail. The importance of this downtown historic area is recognized by the Secretary of the Interior with numerous buildings being listed on the National Register of Historic Places. In addition to the Brown and Hawkins store and the Government Cable House, there is also Saint Peter's Church, the Van Gilder Hotel, The Seward Railroad Depot, The Ballaine House, the Swetmann House and The Lowell Creek Diversion Dam. The City of Seward has also bestowed a local historic district designation on the downtown historic district, which is important to the community, the state and the nation and is enjoyed by residents and visitors throughout the year. Preserving the integrity of the Downtown Historic District is a high priority for the community because it saves a key part of Seward's heritage, enhances quality of life and supports economic development. This document presents Design Guidelines for protecting historic resources and promoting compatible new construction within their context. They offer criteria for determining the appropriateness of improvements. Introduction 33 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Figure 1. West View of 4th Avenue, June 1923 BROWW A_HAWKf Ns; FN+^:rr IIMr � .►+r4�;..e'4flaiiit Figure 2. Brown and Hawkins July 2019 A view looking west along 4t" Avenue, as it appeared over a hundred- and fifteen -year period, illustrates a moderate pace of change. Many early buildings survive, and others from the mid -Twentieth Century have also taken on historic significance. These "newer" buildings reflect their own times, in terms of style, but are compatible with their older neighbors, because they share basic similarities of design at a fundamental level. Features like these are addressed in these design euidelines to retain the historic character of downtown Introduction 34 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Seward, which is key to the community's identity, livability and economy. Introduction 09 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit them. Who Can Use the Design Guidelines? The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Seward wrote these guidelines for property owners and the citizens of Seward. to assist in making decisions about rehabilitation of historic properties, or planning new construction. They provide guidance to maintain the historic character of the district and individual landmarks. Figure 3. Saint Peter's Episcopal Church What are Design Guidelines? The guidelines are best practices for improving or protecting historic structures, and assisting non-contributing, existing buildings, and new, "infill" construction to be compatible with the look of historic areas. Why have Design Figure 4 Jess Lee Home Guidelines? Design Guidelines establish a common understanding of preservation principles and standards and how to apply Introduction [cZ: 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit When to use the Design Guidelines The Design Guidelines should be consulted for all projects which may affect the integrity of historic resources. While ordinary repair and maintenance is appropriate, seemingly minor alterations to a historic structure, such as enclosing a storefront or changing windows, can have a dramatic effect on the character of a historic structure. The following list of common changes that can have a significant impact on the integrity of a historic structure are good examples where the guidelines can be helpful. • Construction of a new addition • Alteration or restoration of exterior features of a historic building • Removal or demolition, in whole or in part, of a historic building • Alteration of a storefront • Application of new exterior siding material • Addition of a new window or door opening • Creation of a driveway or a parking area • Application of architectural features and other miscellaneous modifications, such as cornices and bulkheads. This list is not all inclusive. For questions regarding permits and the applicability of these guidelines, please contact the City of Seward's Building Department. Where do the Design Guidelines apply? The Design Guidelines apply to properties within the Downtown Historic District, as shown on the enclosed map, but may be also be applied to historic structures throughout Seward. Introduction iii 37 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Compliance with the Guidelines Complying with the relevant guidelines is voluntary and will assist you in maintaining the historic character of your property and the neighborhood for the benefit of you and your community. In doing so, you contribute to the values and goals of Seward to preserve the historic buildings and character of Downtown Seward. We thank you! These guidelines are compatible with Seward's existing zoning and building codes. Figure 5. Downtown Historic District, Seward, Alaska. Is there a more up to date map? The boundary of the Downtown Seward Historic District includes a concentration of "contributing" structures near the intersection of Front and Franklin Streets, and then extends south along Franklin Street itself for several more blocks. *Depth of area subject to the designated height limit. Introduction 38 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit New Chapter- Planning a Preservation Project Planning a Preservation Project When planning a preservation project, it is important to assemble sufficient information about the property to determine its significance and the degree to which it retains its integrity as a historic resource. Then, a specific approach to the overall treatment of the property should be established. This may include keeping the building in its current character while making appropriate repairs, or incorporating new, compatible changes. It is then important to determine how surviving historic features will be treated. This may include preserving those features that remain intact, repairing those that are deteriorated and replacing others. These steps in planning a preservation project are presented in this section. First, determine your building type: Non -Contributing See Page ix Historic Building New Construction See Chapters 7 - 10 Step 1TConduct Historic Research. Step 2: Uetermine Historic Y Integrity. Contributing or Non -Contributing Ste43: Identify Key Features. Ste44: Choose an Approach. Step 5: Choose a Treatment. Introduction 011 w 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines pppppp— VAN GILDFR �-IOTEL W 1 3t�y Figure 6. Von Gilder Hotel2020. Benoit Introduction Ato] vii 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Step 1: Conduct Historic Research. Understanding the history of a building is important to any preservation project. An early question is: does the building date from the period of significance for the district (presently 1903-1941). The method of construction, the historic uses and other unique features will influence which preservation approach is most appropriate. Useful materials to investigate a building's history include Sanborn Maps, historic photos, and written histories of Seward. Good starting places to obtain historic building information are the Historic Preservation Commission for the City of Seward, the Community Development Department, Resurrection Bay Historic Museum, and State Historical Library. Step 2: Determine Historic Integrity. Buildings with integrity have a sufficient percentage of structure exhibiting characteristics from the period of significance. This is identified in a Survey of Historic Resources by the Seward Historic Preservation Commission in the Seward Downtown Historic District. The majority of a building's structural system and its materials should date from that time and its key character -defining features also should remain including the overall mass and form of the building. These key elements allow a building to be recognized as a product of its time. A building with a high degree of historic integrity qualifies as a "contributing" property to the district. Others have lost their integrity and are termed "non-contributing." Definition of a Contributing Property Contributing properties form the foundation of historic districts and are either individually eligible for the National Register or clearly contribute to the district's historic character. These are buildings that are in comparatively original condition; some have minor alterations and others have been appropriately restored. These buildings might still be improved by some further restoration efforts. Information on buildings that are identified as "Contributing" by Seward is available to the public and are listed in the 2017 Seward Historic Preservation Plan, Appendix F. NPS Determination of Eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places. Seward Commercial Historic District 8/11/2004. or national history, heritage or culture. Is the site of a significant historical event. Is identified with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the local, regional, state, or national culture and history. Exemplifies the cultural, economic, social, or historic heritage of Often, a property may also be considered contributing if it has one or more of the following attributes: Hair, icAder, interest, or value as part of the local, regional, state, vii to 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit See National Park Service (NPS) Preservation Brief 17: Architectural Character: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character, for further information. Figure 7. The Cable House, early Twentieth Century Figure 8. The Cable House, 2019. A building has historic integrity when it maintains its original character -de- fining features, structural system and building materials. A comparison of historic (early 20th century) and con- temporary (2019) photographs demonstrates that this building retains a high degree of integrity. Introduction E,% ix 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Includes the work of an architect, engineer, or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the community. Embodies elements of architectural or engineering design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation, or which is unique. The guidelines for rehabilitation apply to all contributing properties Non -Contributing Property There are other buildings that exist within the boundaries of the historic district that do not contribute to its significance. Some of these are ones that have an early construction date, but have been so substantially altered that they no longer convey the historic character and the later alterations have no significance in themselves. Other properties are more recent, and therefore have not taken on historic significance. Many are still "compatible" with the character of the district but are not "contributors" in terms of the history of the area. Therefore, there are two types of "non-contributing" properties: (1) Older structures that have lost their integrity, and (2) new buildings that are not within the period of significance for the district. Non- Contributing properties are also listed in the 2017 Seward Historic Preservation Plan, Appendix F. NPS Determination of Eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places. Seward Commercial Historic District 8/11/2004. When reviewing improvements to non-contributing properties, preservation approaches are not needed. What is important is that anyalterations be compatible with the character of the district, just as any new, infill construction should be. Therefore, the guidelines for New Construction can apply to all Non - Contributing Properties. Figure 9. The Seward Community Library and Petro Plaza in Seward, AK were constructed later than the historic period of significance and are considered "non-contributing" properties. Introduction 43 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Differing Degrees of Integrity Original Intact: High Degree of Integrity This property retains a high degree of integrity: most of the original features and materials survive. It would be rated " contributing." Moderate Alterations: Retains Sufficient Integrity In this case, the building has lost some of its original features and materials and integrity has been compromised. Nonetheless, these losses are retrievable and therefore the building retains its historic integrity. Integrity Lost: Non -Contributing This building has lost nearly all of the structure's historic fabric. It is no longer possible to adequately interpret its historic character and therefore, has lost its historic i integrity. —Roof Cornice with brackets - Double -hung _ -windows — j }_ — �I�_ Clerestory - - , Windows TC Display `�j Ir II Windows Recessed Entry _e— Simplified - _ Brackets as _ J Replaced �) = Windows Enclosed Space Kickplate Decoration Altered Roof Form Altered Window I,_ Openings � New Siding Clerestory Windows Removed L;!=-- ---- Flush Entry Introduction 44 ix 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Step 3: Identify Key Features. If the property is determined to be a contributor to the district, then it is important to identify which features are significant. This will help determine to what degree the property should be preserved as it is, or where there may be opportunities for compatible alterations tooccur. Step 4: Choose an Approach for Improvement. Preservation projects may include a range of activities, such as maintenance of existing historic elements, repairs of deteriorated materials, the replacement of missing features and construction of new additions. The following is a list of approaches that are appropriate for contributing properties: 4 Preservation. "Preservation" is the act or process of applying measures to sustain the existing form, integrity, and material of a building. Some work focuses on keeping a property in good working condition by repairing features as soon as deterioration becomes apparent, using procedures that retain the original character and finish of the features. Property owners are strongly encouraged to maintain properties in good condition. 4 Rehabilitation. "Rehabilitation" is the process of returning a property to a state that makes a contemporary use possible while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historical, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include a change in use of the building or additions. 4 Restoration. "Restoration" reproduces the appearance of a building exactly as it looked at a particular moment in time. This process may include the removal of later work or the replacement of missing historic features. 4 Reconstruction. "Reconstruction" of a building means rebuilding a structure, or a portion of one, that no longer exists exactly as it appeared historically. Introduction M1 x 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Step 5: Choosing a Treatment for Building Components. Selecting an appropriate treatment for specific building components of contributing properties will provide for proper preservation of significant features. The treatment options are presented in order of preference. In selecting, follow this sequence: Preserve: If a feature is intact and in good condition, maintain it as such. 2. Repair: If the feature is deteriorated or damaged, repair it to its original condition. 3. Replace: If it is not feasible to repair the feature, then replace it with one that is the same or similar in character (e.g., materials, detail, finish) to the original one. Replace only that portion which is beyond repair. 4. Reconstruct: If the feature is missing entirely, reconstruct it from appropriate evidence. 5. New feature or addition: If a new feature or addition is necessary, design it in such a way as to minimize the impact on original features. It is also important to distinguish new features from original historic elements. 6. This contemporary addition to a historic building is appropriate. The addition is set back from the street facade, minimizing the impact on the existing structure. The materials on the addition are also distinguishable from the historic fabric and clearly read as a product of its time. Figure 10. The Alaska Shop and an addition. Introduction t A 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Figure 11 St. Peter's Church Introduction 47 xii 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Alterations Many historic structures have experienced alterations as tastes changed or the need for additional space occurred. Early alterations typically were subordinate in scale and character to the main building and were often executed using materials similar tothose used historically. Some early alterations may have historic value of their own. Recent alterations usually have no historic value. Alterations are anticipated to continue. It is important that new alterations be designed in a manner compatible with the historic character of the building and implemented without damaging the historic fabric. Introduction 48 xii 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Criteria for Replacing Historic Features If a historic structure has been altered, what is the appropriate approach for its treatment? When a historically significant building has an important, character defining feature that is deteriorated, altered or missing, it is clear that the feature should be repaired or, if repair is impossible, it should be replaced with materialsthat are similarto thatwhich existed historically, to maintain the integrity of the building. Sometimes, replacing the missing feature or alteration with contemporary but compatible new features might be appropriate. Thus, there are two treatments which could be appropriate for repairing or replacing missing or altered features: Option A: Reconstruct the historic design. This is the preferred treatment. Option B: Replace the missing or altered feature with a contemporary but compatible new feature. If original is missing... Two options may be considered: The original details may be recon- structed if good evidence is available. This is the preferred treatment. A simplified version of the original may be considered. Be sureto usethe majorlines of the original detail. Introduction E,M 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit If the project is being reviewed, the reviewer should determine which option (A or B) is appropriate when evaluating proposals for the replacement of deteriorated, non- historic alterations or missing historic features on historic buildings in Seward. There are three main criteria to consider: First, what is the significance of the building? If the building has a high level of significance, then reconstruction is preferred. If the building is contributing to the historic sense of the street but is not landmark quality, then more flexibility may be appropriate. Either replacing the feature using Option A and B can be considered. Second, to what degree has the building retained its historic integrity and how important is the missing or altered feature to conveying the historic character of the building? If the building has retained a high degree of its historic integrity and the missing feature is important to the building's character, then it should be reconstructed. If the building has been substantially altered, then both Options A and B described above can be considered. Third, what is the quality of information about the historic features of the building? This criterion addresses the practical issue of whether or not the historic features literally can be replaced or replicated. There may not be sufficient information available about the historic feature to be confident that it can be replaced accurately. Review Process Contact the City of Seward Planning and Building Departments. The Historic Preservation Commission is also happy to assist with research and recommendations. Introduction xiv 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Seward'sMain Mr ]ul)l 15, 1920. Arc(AWka R8 Coll—i—) How the Guidelines Apply This chart illustrates how individual chapters of the guidelines apply to specific property types and construction projects. See the appendix for an explanation of the terms used in the "type of work" column. To determine if a property is designated as "contributing," contact the City's Planning Department or the Historic Preservation Commission. J : This chapter applies to the project. C v t O +� ° v 0) -0 U Q M O �' O — i '� N v N tLO U VI •N O OJ +-+ M Q O .� L O C O a 3 OJ O L N C ti_O +-+ OJ O +-+ �n v +-+ +-+ C OJ OJ +-+ L to N C COu. O = cc d 2 rp 2� 2 N Z in (n d O rl �n N L M .� Ln w 1p C ri zu 06 •� � O 1-1 N U L L U L L L L L O L U L : L N L O O ci U a .� a a-0 a-0 a L a 'A Q Q— Q C to to 2 l6 l6 l6 OJ to C to to U to -C O -C C -C M -C i U d U D U O U CO U CO U Q U U U M U LL U N Q (6 Type of work: Work on a "contributing property" in the Downtown Historic District. Work on a "non- contributing" property in the Downtown Historic District. Figure 13. Fourth Avenue in the mid 1920's. Introduction 62 xv 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Work on a "new construction project" in the Downtown Historic District. Work on a "landmark property" not within the Historic District Boundaries Introduction 6% xvi Bullets Provide Additional Informatio 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Structure of the Design Guidelines Each design guideline presented includes several components that constitute the criteria upon which design review decisions should be made. Design Element Topic The guidelines are grouped into pertinent design element categories (e.g., site planning, building materials, store fronts). Policy Statement Each design element category has a policy statement that explains the City of Seward's basic approach to the treatment of that topic. In cases where the detailed Design Guidelines do not appear to address a situation, the general policy statement shall serve as the basis for determining appropriateness. Design Guidelines Specific Design Guidelines are numbered in order to reference them during the design review process. The guidelines are not numbered in order of importance. Additional Information Supplementary information is listed as bullet (•) statements Illustrations Design Guidelines may be accompanied by a photograph and/or illustration that supports the guideline language Design Element Windows and Doors Topic Original windows and doors are important features that Policy help convey the character of a building. Original elements shall be preserved, when feasible. Design Guideline n '1 :1 Maintain historic storefront openings. The size and shape of the storefront are 110. important characteristics that contribute to the integrity of a historic commercial building. Avoid altering the shapes of these features. If these elements have already been altered, consider restoring them if their original condition can be determined. Introduction 53 xvii 220414 HP WS Historic District Guidelines Notes provided by Commissioner Benoit Sample guideline format. University of Kansas, 2022. Implementing Promising Community Interventions » Chapter 26. Changing the Physical and Social Environment » Section 7. Encouraging Historic Preservation University of Kansas. Retrieved April 10, 2022, from the Community Tool Box: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/implement/physical-social-environment/historic- preservation/tools. Introduction 54 NATIONAL HP MONTH PROCLAMATION 611 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth and sustainable development, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride, and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life and all ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us; and WHEREAS, "This Place Matters" is the theme for National Preservation Month for May, aoao and is sponsored by the National Trust for Historic Preservation; and WHEREAS, over the course of the past year, the Seward Historic Preservation Commission has initiated and contributed to local historic preservation activities and projects such as the Seward Downtown Historic District Overlay, nomination of Historic Preservation awards, nomination of structures to the Seward Local Register and Historic Properties Inventory List, and continual Public Outreach. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Christy Terry, Mayor of the City of Seward, do hereby proclaim May, aoao as: NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH and do call upon our community to join their fellow citizens across the United States in recognizing and participating in this special observance. Dated this 26th day of May, aoao. THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Christy Terry, Mayor