Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes2003-084Sponsored by: Shealy CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2003-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (GUIDE). WHEREAS, the City of Seward has long pursued the expansion of the Small Boat Harbor; and WHEREAS, in 1998, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, (USACE) completed a Feasibility Study and an Environmental Assessment for the project, both of which were approved in 1999; and WHEREAS, the Project failed to gain full federal funding until FY 2002, when $1 million was appropriated for design and construction. Additionally, the City sought, and received, $2.9 million in matching funds from the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities in 2000 and a $1.3 million Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration grant in 2001; and WHEREAS, the remainder of federal funds, approximately $4.0 million, was appropriated earlier this year and the USACE has prepared contract specifications for construction beginning in the fall of 2003; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 2002, the City of Seward City Council approved Resolution 2002-082 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Tryck Nyman and Hayes, Incorporated (TNH) to provide Public Involvement and Schematic Design Services for the East Harbor Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 2002-119 on November 18th 2002, adding master plan development services to the existing contract; and WHEREAS, after a lengthy and comprehensive public involvement process, Plan N, Revision-1, was reviewed and recommended by Port and Commerce Advisory Board Resolution 2003-01, which, after a few minor changes in dock alignment resulted in Plan N, Revision-2, adopted on April 28, 2003 by City Council Resolution 2003-32; and WHEREAS, the complete Guide, with Plan N, Revision-2, was completed in June 2003; and WHEREAS, the Guide's purpose is to serve as a road map for future harbor area development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, that: Section 1. The Seward Small Boat Harbor Planning and Development Guide, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is approved and adopted. Section 2. The improvements in the Guide will be accomplished in stages in such a manner that the Small Boat Harbor remains a working harbor at all times; such a requirement means that accomplishment of this plan must be made in phases to assure minimum blockage of travel in and out of slips. Section 3. Prior to commencement of any phase, a determination will be made about which features should be included in that phase, including modifications in specifications, quantity and/or size, depending upon funding availability at that time, market studies, economic analyses, public hearings and technical reviews. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Seward, Alaska this 1 lth day of August 2003. AYES: Shafer, Amberg, NOES: None ABSENT: Branson ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Jear4ewis J CVClerk THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA Stu Clark, Mayor Valdatta, Orr, Dunham, Clark (City Se)to , SEAL i � �� COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Meeting Date: August 11, 2003 Through: Phil Shealy, City Manager From: Harbormaster, James B. Beckham Agenda Item: Approving and Adopting the Seward Small Boat Harbor Planning and Development Guide (Guide) BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: The City of Seward has long pursued the expansion of the Small Boat Harbor. In 1998, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, (USACE) completed a Feasibility Study and an Environmental Assessment for the project. The Feasibility Study was favorable and the project was approved in FYI 999. The Project failed to gain federal funding until FY2002, when $1 million was appropriated for design and construction. Additionally, the City sought, and received, $2.9 million in matching funds from the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities in 2000 and a $1.3 million Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration Grant in 2001. The remainder of the federal funds, approximately $4.0 million, was appropriated earlier this year and the USACE is ready to bid the project. On August 26, 2002, the City of Seward City Council approved Resolution 2002-082 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with TNH to provide Public Involvement and Schematic Design Services for the :East Harbor Expansion Project. The City Council approved Resolution 2002-119 on November 18th, 2002, adding a "master plan" component to the existing contract. After a lengthy and comprehensive public involvement process, Plan N, Revision-1, was reviewed and recommended by PACAB Resolution 2003-01. A few minor changes in dock alignment resulted in Plan N, Revision2, which the City Council adopted on April 28, 2003 by Resolution 2003-32. The complete Guide, with Plan N, Revision-2, was completed in June 2003. Its purpose is to serve as a guide for future harbor area development. T: Yes No 1. Comprehensive Plan X Economic Development, Small Boat Harbor Development: expand and maximize potential of the existing harbor. Transportation Facilities, Harbors: Continue to support, promote, enhance and develop harbor facilities... 2. Strategic Plan X Economic Base ,Improve and Expand Maritime Facilities: complete eastward expansion of the Small Boat Harbor 3. Other: Small Boat Harbor Management Plan X Harbor Development, New Harbor Development and Expansion:... expand the existing harbor FISCAL NOTE: To complete the entire work described in the Guide as depicted today is estimated to cost approximately $29,000,000 in 2003 dollars. Selected portions of this Guide will be completed in concert with the Federal East Harbor Expansion Project, the extent of which depends largely on funds available at the time of construction and City Council approval. An estimated $9,000,000 of the Guide components may be completed with the East Harbor Expansion Project Approved by Finance Department RECOMMENDATION: Council approves Resolution 2003- adopting the Seward Small Boat Harbor Planning and Development Guide. Seward Small Boat Harbor Planning and Development Guide Prepared for The City of Seward, Alaska by Tryck Nyman Hayes, Inc. 911 W. 8�h Avenue, Suite 300 Anchorage, AK 99501. In association with Haight and Associates ResourcEcon Brooks & Associates June 2003 A "'? Seward Small Boat Harbor Planning and Development Guide Summary This document is intended to serve as a general information source o eed uturethat the harbor development and upgrade, including seeking additional funding. P plan presented will be revised and/or updated as needs aopportunities present and facilities are upgraded. The development plan presented pt for the fully developed harbor. The City of Seward and the Corps of Engineers are in the process of expanding the harbor eastward to the Coal Dock. This projectwillbe und' construction including formal P 1 of public 2003. The City embarked on a preliminary design process harbor. This involvement process en ly d eveloptheed to includeoat ythenfor the entire harbor, eexdcludmg upland process was subsequently P commercial and transportation interests. An extensive planning and public involvement process has been accomplished to arrive at an overall development plan for the Seward Small Boat Harbor. Fifteen different concepts with additional variations were developed and presented for comment mees. ratt pupblic meetings, open house meetings, advisory board and city romise between the presented is the culmination of this process. It represents a comp need for additional slips and transient moorage for adjustments will be necessary as the d commercial interests. Stakeholders must also recognizej the administration of the harbor is expanded and modernized. City codes governing harbor facilities will need revision to reflect changes in policy and to be consistent with existing regulations. The harbor department will need to change its operations as a result of these code revisions and users will need to adjust to these changes as the facility is upgraded and modernized. The development plan includes new and replacement monolithic concrete floats with water, power, fire protection and sewer utilities, rehabilitated fixed docks with new utilities, bulkhead loading area, a TraveLift® area, maintenance area and parking improvements, relocated launch ramp, restrooms, dry stack storage and harbormaster's office. Most features will take many years to fully implement. As indi fundingiduabefe comes available there will be additional opportunities to review this p lan'sand make appropriate adjustments. 03 The fully developed plan will cost inner harbor dately $31,900,000 in evelopment may take plane as soon as Construction of the first phase of the the fall of 2004. Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General...................................................................................................................... Approach 1 1.2 Project ...................................................................................................... 2.0 Regional Description.................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Brief History ........................................................... :................................................. 2 2 2.2 Location.................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Climate...................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Winds........................................................................................................................ 3 2.5 Tides.......................................................................................................................... ................................................... 4 2.6 Waves ..................................................................... 2.7 Ice.............................................................................................................................. Use Ownership 4 5 2.8 Land and .......................................................................................... 3. 0 Existing Harbor Facilities ............................................................................. 3.1 The Small Boat Harbor............................................................................................. 3.2 Seward Marine Industrial Center(SMIC)................................................................. """""""' 5 5 7 Plan 8 4.0 The Development .................................................................................................. ............................................................ 8 Public Involvement Goals and Chronology.............................................................. 4.1 10 4.2 Economic Evaluation.............................................................................................. Engineers East Expansion Plan ................................................................ 12 4.3 Corps of 12 5.0 Development Plan Selection....................................................................................... 5.1 General ............................... .............................................................. 5.2 Criteria and Criteria Evaluation.............................................................................. ....................... 12 13 17 5.3 Plan Selection.......................................................................................................... Description 18 6.0 Development Plan ................................................................................... 18 6.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 18 6.2 Float System Layout............................................................................................... Table 8, Wait List by Slip Length..................................................................................... General............................................................................................................. 28 21 Interior Access Channel................................................................................................ 22 EastHarbor Float Layout.............................................................................................. Layout ..................................................... 22 North Harbor Float Layout 23 South Harbor Float ........................................................................................... Power and Lighting........................................................................................................... Trestles ................................................... 26 26 6.4 Gangways and .................................. 6.5 Launch Ramps ................................................................. 6.6 Parking Areas ................... ................................................................................ ....................................... 27 28 28 SouthParking Area....................................................................................................... Area 28 NortheastParking ................................................................................................. 6.7 TraveLifte and Maintenance Area......................................................................... 6.9 City "T„-Dock......................................................................................................... Harbor Bulkheads 28 30 30 6.10 North ....................................................................................... 6.11 Drive Down Float................................................................................................. 30 31 6.12 Tidal Grid.............................................................................................................. 31 6.13 Fish Cleaning Facilities......................................................................................... 32 6.14 Restroom Facilities ............................................................................................... 32 Storage 6.15 Dry Stack Boat ......................................................................................... 33 6.16 ADA Accessible Fishing Pier............................................................................... 33 6.17 Harbormaster's Office and Shop.......................................................................... 33 7.0 Plan Implementation................................................................................................... 33 7.1 Implementation....................................................................................................... 34 I 7.2 Phase ..................................................................................................................... 34 7.3 Future Phases.......................................................................................................... Appendix A Cost Estimates Appendix B Figures Appendix C Public Involvement (under separate cover) Appendix D Economics Overview Appendix E City of Seward, Alaska, Resolution 2003-032 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide 1.0 Introduction 1.1 General The Seward Small Boat Harbor is a significant aspect of the overall commercial and economic picture of the City of Seward. The existing harbor was constructed immediately following the 1964 earthquake and had minimal maintenance and upgrades until 1998. In that year, the city began to actively pursue transfer of the facility from state ownership to the municipality. The city took ownership of the harbor in February 1999 and received $3.2 million in deferred maintenance monies as part -of the agreement. The city leveraged this into a $7 million project to renovate approximately half of the existing float system by installing, in 2001, modern state -of -the -industry concrete floats, ADA compliant access ramps and new fish cleaning stations. The city continues to aggressively pursue renewal and modernization of the facility. This document is an essential part of that program. The City of Seward in conjunction with the Corps of Engineers will be expanding the small boat harbor to the east to the existing coal loading facility, beginning in the fall of 2003. This report summarizes the results of the study to prepare a plan for the expanded harbor. The study includes an extensive public involvement process, which would provide a vision for the development and improvement of harbor related facilities in and around the small boat harbor. The development plan provides concept level schematic plans for the improvement, modernization and replacement of obsolete or deteriorating harbor and related upland features. The plan considers a new float system for the east expansion area, replacement of old and deteriorated floats in the existing north and south harbors, rehabilitation and improvements to the existing "T"-Dock and I -Dock (Lift Dock), new bulkheads and TraveLiftO pit on the north side of the harbor, northwest maintenance area, launch ramps, parking areas, restroom facilities and harbormaster office and shop. The development plan provides the present view for the future harbor. Most features will be implemented at some time in the future as need, priority and funding dictate. Only the new floats for the east expansion area and selected other features will be implemented in the near future. 1.2 Project Approach The City of Seward in association with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is expanding the existing small boat harbor to the east toward the coal dock. New floats will be required for the expanded project. In August, 2002, the city contracted with Tryck Nyman Hayes, Inc. to provide schematic design services to develop the new float system and to coordinate a public involvement process to ensure that the new float system meets the needs of the harbor users and that user concerns were considered. The city expanded the project in November, 2002 to include the entire harbor area and to consider future harbor needs. The Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) is not included as part of this planning project. J� Public involvement was a significant aspect of the plan development. Public meetings and workshops were scheduled to inform the public of the progress of the plan development and to obtain their comments and suggestions. Questionnaires, newsletters and web page additions were included. Through the comments received specific issues surfaced and the plan was modified to address them as completely and thoroughly as possible. Significant effort went into developing a plan that accommodates as many of the concerns as possible. Numerous plans variations were developed and reviewed leading to the proposed Planning and Development Guide. 2.0 Regional Description 2.1 Brief History Russian fur trader and explorer Alexander Baranof named Resurrection Bay in 1792. While sailing from Kodiak to Yakutat, he found unexpected shelter in this bay from a storm. He named the bay Resurrection because it was the Russian Sunday of the Resurrection. The City of Seward was named for U.S. Secretary of State William Seward, 1861-69, who negotiated the purchase of Alaska from Russia during the Lincoln administration. In the 1890s, Capt. Frank Lowell arrived with his family. In 1903, John and Frank Ballaine and a group of settlers arrived to begin construction of a railroad. Seward became an incorporated City in 1912. The Alaska Railroad was constructed between 1915 and 1923, and Seward developed as an ocean terminus and supply center. By 1960, Seward was the largest community on the Kenai Peninsula. Tsunamis generated during the 1964 earthquake destroyed the railroad terminal and killed several residents. As an ice -free harbor, Seward has become an important supply center for Interior Alaska. 2.2 Location The City of Seward is situated in the northwest corner of Resurrection Bay, a north -south fjord 19 miles long and 3 miles wide opening to the Gulf of Alaska, and on the southeast coast of the Kenai Peninsula, 125 highway miles south of Anchorage. Resurrection Bay depths exceed 120 fathoms (720 feet) and the mountains on either side rise to elevations more than 4000 feet above sea level. See drawing Sheet 1. The city lies at the foot of Mount Marathon and is the gateway to the Kenai Fjords National Park. It lays at approximately 60° 07' N Latitude, 1490 26' W Longitude (Sec. 10, TOO S, R001 W, Seward Meridian). The area encompasses 15 sq. miles of land and 7 sq. miles of water. 2.3 Climate The sub -arctic maritime climate at Seward is characterized by relatively mild winters and summers. The average temperature is 25 F in winter and 62 F in the summer. A monthly climatic summary is shown in Table 1. Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 2 of 34 Table 1- Monthly Climate Summary, Seward, Alaska Average Max. Temperature Jan 30.3 Feb 32.5 Mar 37.1 Apr 44.3H15 May JunRE�[SepjOct 8.4H 49.9 ]619 49.4 5.22HHHH 55.3 43.7 44.5 34.4 Nov 36.0 26.6H Dec 31.4 Annua 45.5. 34.1 67.64 Average Min. Temperature Average Total Precipitation (in•) 20.5 6.23 21.8 5.45 25.4 HH 31.8 38.8 HH2]59 45.3 Average Total SnowFall m. Average Snow IDIDDIDET10 Depth (in.) HEO[12]8 5.]6FO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 7.4 20.4 82.3 1�0 �o Source: Western Region Climate Center 2.4 Winds Winds at Seward are effectively aligned north -south with the topography of Resurrection Bay. Winds are predominately northerly from October to March shifting to southerly in June and July and back to northerly by October. The Corps of Engineers harbor expansion feasibility report indicates a 50-year recurrence interval design wind for wave analysis of 63 miles per hour. Winds over 35 knots from the north are common during the winter months with southerly winds of 6 to 15 knots, occasionally higher, during the summer months. Strong winds can occur from either the north or south at any time of the year. 2.5 Tides Tides at Seward have a mean range of 8.3 feet and a diurnal range of 10.6 feet, causing tidal currents of 1 (flood) to 1.7 (ebb) knots. Tide levels, referenced to mean lower low water (MLLW) are shown in Table 2. Extreme high tide levels result from the combination of astronomic tides and rise in local water levels due to atmospheric and wave conditions. r7 Page 3 of 34 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Table 2 — Tidal Data, Seward, Alaska Tide Elevation (feet) Highest Observed Water Level* +15.70 Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) +10.63 Mean High Water (MHW) + 9.71 Mean Sea Level (MSL) + 5.56 Mean Tide Level (MTL) + 5.55 Mean Low Water (MLW) + 1.38 Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) 0.00 Lowest Observed Water Level** - 4.42 * January 1, 1987 **January 1, 1991 Source: NOAA, National Ocean Service 2.6 Waves Measured wave data is not available for the Seward area. As reported in the Corps of Engineers small boat harbor expansion feasibility report, the following general statements appear applicable to the wave climate a. Wave heights of 4 to 6 feet are the maximum observed by longtime local residents (in the vicinity of the existing harbor). b. "Typical' wave periods range from about 3 to 6 seconds. c. Local residents and recorded data indicate waves from the south-southeast predominate. d. Long -period swells from the open ocean do not impact the existing harbor area. (Long period waves DO impact the marine industrial center on the east side of the bay.) The Corps feasibility report wave analysis completed in 1998 found that a 6.2-foot wave height and a 4.6 second period design wave should be used for breakwater structure design. Waves of approximately 3 feet in the vicinity of the small boat harbor are common with southerly summer winds. 2.7 Ice Resurrection Bay is ice free throughout the year. The existing harbor does not freeze up, although skim ice does form occasionally in north and west portions of the harbor during the coldest winter months. This is likely a result of natural underground fresh water intrusion into the harbor. 54 cP.. i cuu Planning and Development Guide Page 4 of 34 2.8 Land Use and Ownership Land use and ownerships were obtained from the city planning department and reviewed for conflicts or concerns related to proposed facilities. Facilities and upgrades covered in this document are compatible with the land use zoning and are owned or controlled by the city. (See Sheet 2.) The only exception is the the Dry Stack Storage facility, described later in this report, which is shown on Alaska Railroad lands. Agreements would need to be made regarding this site or a new location determined. For the purposes of this document, the concept is included as a placeholder for planning. 3.0 Existing Harbor Facilities 3.1 The Small Boat Harbor The original harbor was authorized by Congress in 1930 and later modified by Congress in 1935. The authorization provided for a 4.75-acre basin at a —12.5 MLLW depth protected by a south breakwater 580 feet long and a north breakwater 950 feet long. Construction began in 1931. The authorization was modified in 1954 to raise the elevation of the south breakwater and add tow pile breakwaters at the entrance to the basin. This project was completely destroyed by the 1964 earthquake. The Rivers and Harbors Act, 19 August 1964, provided for the relocation and reconstruction of a 12.45-acre harbor with entrance channel at —15 feet MLLW protected by two rock mound breakwaters of 1060 and 1750 feet, with future provision for expansion. Reconstruction began in August 1964 incrementally as other waterfront projects were constructed. The project was completed in November 1965. The northwest comer of the present basin (from approximately F Float northward on the west side of the basin) is a locally constructed basin expansion. Several floods have affected the harbor since construction. The event with the most impact was the fall flood in 1995 when approximately 23,000 cubic yards of material entered the harbor, primarily in the northeast comer covering the tidal grid. Approximately 20,000 cubic yards were dredged in 1996. The grid was left covered with sediment and abandoned. Many of the existing floats were constructed and installed by the State of Alaska in 1966 through 1973 soon after the basin was completed. X-Float was originally constructed in 1978 and rebuilt in 1996 following its catastrophic failure. Harbor maintenance has been very limited and generally deferred. A, B and C-Floats had utility upgrades and were re - decked and re -billeted in 1996. These older timber floats are in relatively poor condition with a limited life expectancy. S-Float and D-Float are in the poorest condition and in need of immediate attention. The City "I" -Dock and I -Dock (Lift Dock) are also in need of major repair and upgrade. cPurnrrl CRH Piannine and Development Guide Page 5 of 34 The City of Seward signed the Transfer of Responsibility Agreement turning the ownership of the float system over to the City in February 1999. The Corps of Engineers quitclaim deeded the basin back to the City in November 1999. The State Department of Transportation performed a detailed condition survey in April 1997 to evaluate the condition of the float system prior to transferring ownership to the City. The City verified the State's evaluation with a separate review in March 1998 using a team of harbor staff, a contract engineer and the State's Harbor Engineer. In general, the condition of the harbor was "fair to good". The timber float structure and floatation on most floats were only in "fair" condition. Portions of the north harbor, E, F, H, J and G Floats were replaced with new concrete floats in 2001. Statistics for the existing harbor are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Sheet 3 shows the current (2003) harbor configuration. Table 3 - Harbor Vital Statistics, 01/03/03 Slip Number Length Available 17' 66 23' 57 32' 203 40' 64 42' 58 50' 53 75' 8 90 12 120 1 522 total slips 18375ft Parallel 2062 Feet Total Available 20437 Feet r- n v o Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 6 of 34 Table 4 - Moorage Available by Float Float Number Length A 57 23 B 54 32 C 62 32 D 58 42 E, South 27 50 E, North 21 75,90,120 F, South 632 Feet F, North 26 50 F, T-Head 1 60 G, South 22 17 H 64 40 H, T- Head 1 90 J 41 32 g 46 32 L 240 Feet S, South 24 17 S, North 20 17 X 1040 Feet 3.2 Seward Marine Industrial Center (SMIC) Concepts are being developed for enclosing the basin at the Seward Marine Industrial Center across Resurrection Bay at Fourth of July Creek. Presently south and southwest winds bring long period swells into the northern part of the SMIC basin. The long period waves cause sufficient motion to barges and other vessels that operations become difficult and damage occurs to both vessels and docks. The addition of a wave barrier would eliminate the swell and wind driven waves and make the existing docks usable. A large vessel transient dock and/or mooring dolphins would relieve significant pressure on the small boat harbor as a place to moor large vessels, barges and those vessels waiting for the ship lift, and other vessels exceeding the design limitations of the harbor. This would allow the small boat harbor to concentrate on the smaller commercial and recreational fleet. Sheet 4 shows one concept alternative for a wave barrier. r +�y Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide � �J Page 7 of 34 4.0 The Development Plan 4.1 Public Involvement Goals and Chronology This section presents a summary of the public involvement efforts undertaken to support the preparation of the Planning and Development Guide. The City developed the public involvement process to ensure that harbor users along with associated businesses and neighbors had an opportunity to have their voices heard regarding the future harbor development. Appendix C, included as a separate document, provides all related advertising, newsletters, public service announcements, correspondence, etc., to document these efforts. The goals of the public involvement process included: o Give the harbor users and related harbor dependent commercial to t enterprises would be directly and indirectly affected ample opportunity present thoughts, ideas and comments on what facilities will be constructed and the various design features. ❑ To provide the most useful, convenient and well thought out harbor plan, consistent with present and anticipated future harbor needs. ❑ To take advantage of previous experience, good and bad, to improve the design and construction of the inner harbor facilities, completing them in an efficient and cost-effective manner. ❑ To insure that the design, products and facilities are of the highest quality possible to permit the longest service life with minimum maintenance requirements. Table 5 — Public Involvement Chronology April 2002 Public Notice of Proposed Project published in Alaska Fisherman's Journal September 3, 2002 October 11, 2002 Notice to proceed Meeting: Harbormaster, Seward City Manager, TNH &Brooks and Associates October 22, 2002 Press Release to various media regarding November 4 and November 6 meetings. October 24, 2002 Postcard sent to mailing list regarding 11/4/02 meeting. (1024 names on list) October 24, 2002 Posters/Flyers sent to Seward to posting in local businesses and Harbormaster's office. October 24, 2002 Ad published in Seward Phoenix Log October 28, 2002 Ad published m Anchorage Daily News October 31, 2002 Ad published in Seward Phoenix Log Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 8 of 34 Table 5 — Public Involvement Chronology (continued) November 1, 2002 Meeting with Alaska Railroad Re: Seward Small Boat Harbor Master Plan November, 2002 Seward Small Boat Harbor East Harbor area preliminary engineering and master planning information added to City of Seward internet web page information November 3, 2002 Ad published in Anchorage Daily News November 3, 2002 Article published in Seward Phoenix Log November 4, 2002 Anchorage meeting: Wilda Marston Theatre, Loussac Library, Anchorage 7-9 v.m. questionnaires distributed November 6, 2002 Seward meeting: Vocational Technical Center, Seward 7-9 p.m. Questionnaires distributed November 11, 2002 Questionnaires mailed to individuals not attending November 4 and 6 meetings —approximately 900 total November 15, 2002 Letter to US Army Corps of Engineers regarding COE project December 3, 2002 Anchorage Daily News article on the Seward Boat Harbor Expansion Planning December 5, 2002 Note to email list regarding December 2002 meetings December 6, 2002 Postcard sent to mailing list regarding the December 16, 2002 December 9, 2002 Ad published in Anchorage Daily News December 12, 2002 Ad published in Seward Phoenix Log December 16, 2002 Anchorage Workshop: Loussac Library Conference Room, Anchorage 11.30 a.m. — 1:30 p.m. December 18, 2002 Seward Workshop: City of Seward Council Chambers, Seward 12noon and City of Seward Upstairs Conference Room 7-9 p.m. December 20, 2002 PACAB Meeting 2 2003 Opinion article in Seward Phoenix Log by Bob Shafer _January January 15, 2003 Seward Harbor Master Plan — Criteria and Focus Meeting 22, 2003 PACAB Workshop _January March 5, 2003 PACAB Meeting March 11, 2003 Newsletter sent to mailing list March 23, 2003 Public Service Announcement March 24, 2003 Note to email is regarding March 26, 2003 meeting March 26, 2003 Seward meeting: Seward City all, Seward 6:30-9.30 p.m. April 2, 2003 William H. Seward Yacht Club Meeting April 4, 2003 Postcard sent to Anchorage, Eagle River, Chugiak, Mat -Su, Girdwood, Seward officials on mailing list announcing April 23, 2003 meeting April 7, 2003 City of Seward City Council work session on harbor expansion April 14, 2003 City of Seward Council Meeting April 23, 2003 Anchorage meeting: Rogers Park Elementary School 6:30-8:30 v.m. SO Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 9 of 34 TF hlp 5 — Public Involvement A "128, 2003 city of Seward Council Meeting May 12, 2003 Seward City Council approved and adopted Resolution 2003-32 concerning the Seward Small Boat Harbor Area Planning and Development Guide. The public involvement activities documented in Appendix C under separate cover include the following: Section 1. General Correspondence Section 2. Internet Web Site Section 3. Questionnaire and Results Summary Section 4. Notices, Public Service Announcements and Newsletters Section 5. Electronic Files Mailing List Photos 4.2 Economic Evaluation General - Seward has transitioned from an economic dependence on fluctuating seafood and timber markets to a visitor and recreation -based economy. Most economic growth since 1990 has been driven by the visitor industry, with employment in trade, services and transportation growing at a 5.9 percent annual rate. The community has capitalized on its road and railroad access to market itself as the major access point for visits to the Kenai Fiords National Park and Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. Seward's Alaska SeaLife Center has created another visitor attraction. Commercial fishing has trended downward in importance throughout the 1990s, but it remains a significant part of the Seward economy. Despite the declines experienced for commercial fishing activities, there is a strong future for commercial fishing in Seward. The City hopes to be able to bring back some of the vessel activity that has either moved away from the area or become inactive - awaiting better market and fishery conditions. The state prison located nearby and other government facilities, including the park headquarters, are also important year-round employers. Although a major sawmill was opened in 1993, it never became competitive, and has remained closed since 1994. The 2000 census reported 998 jobs held by Seward residents, but this total does not reflect seasonal jobs and other Seward jobs that are held by non-residents. In a recent report, the Alaska Department of Labor estimated 2002 employment in Seward at 2,300 jobs. The job sectors, in declining order of importance are: public sector 30.3 percent; hospitality 15.0 percent, transportation & utilities 13.2 percent; manufacturing 10.9 G0 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 10 of 34 percent; trade 9.9 percent; health & social services 9.0 percent; services 7.2 percent and construction 4.3 percent. In recent years, population growth in Seward has been relatively modest. The 2002 population of Seward was 2,794 and the 1990 population was 2,699. Seward gains a portion of its total municipal revenues from its sales tax (3 percent) and its accommodation tax (4 percent). The community depends on these revenues to provide services to both residents and visitors. Taxable sales in Seward have trended steadily upward in recent years, from $45 million in 1992 to $75 million in 2002. The largest share of sales is within the retail and service sector. Visitor sales, supported by Seward harbor and marine -related activities contribute substantially to overall municipal revenues. Tourism, recreation and commercial fishing provide substantial support to the community through the small boat harbor. Replacement and modernization of the harbor facilities will enhance the users experience and increase the harbor's ability to generate support for the community. Appendix D provides additional information regarding the economic aspects of the small boat harbor. Current Harbor Use - The current (May 2003) use of the Seward Harbor by vessel owners with a permanent slip is shown in the following summary: Charterboat vessels moored in Seward Harbor There are 113 charterboats moored in the Seward harbor. These vessels range length is from 23 feet to 165 feet, with an average of 43 feet. Motor vessels moored in Seward Harbor There are 462 motorboats moored in the Seward harbor. These vessels range in length is from 15 feet to 225 feet, with an average of 37.2 feet. Sailboats moored in Seward Harbor There are 172 sailboats moored in the Seward harbor. These vessels range in length is from 18 feet to 58 feet, with an average of 34.9 feet. Landing Barges moored in Seward Harbor There are 7 landing barges moored in the Seward harbor. These vessels range in length from 41 to 90 feet, with an average of 71.7 feet. Tugboats moored in Seward Harbor There are 9 tugs moored in the Seward harbor. The vessels range in length is from 47 to 102 feet, with an average of 69.7 feet. The level of unmet demand for moorage in the Seward harbor is unknown. The current waiting list for permanent slips in the Seward harbor includes 377 people. Since there is an annual fee for remaining on the waiting list, it probably represents those people with a commitment to moor in the Seward harbor. However, since the wait for a slip can be up to five to ten years, many prospective vessel owners are forced to try other moorage alternatives. The current harbor expansion will provide moorage slips for an additional 167 vessels. 4.3 Corps of Engineers East Expansion Plan The Alaska District, Corps of Engineers, working with the City of Seward, published in 1998 a feasibility report with the purpose of a) providing additional moorage to satisfy present demand, which has increased since the harbor was constructed and b) relieving the overcrowding and reducing the damages to vessels using the harbor and harbor facilities. The feasibility report looked at expanding the existing harbor to the east or south and new harbors at Nash Road, Lowell Point, and Fourth of July Creek. The eastward expansion was selected as the best alternative. Four alternative plan layouts were then considered. The recommended plan for the Federal project removes the east breakwater, reconstructing it immediately adjacent to the coal dock. The entrance channel is moved to the east and remains in the same configuration. The north -south leg of the existing south breakwater is removed. The mooring basin is dredged with the dredged material being disposed of partly in deep water and partly used, as a mitigation component of the federal project, to develop a parking/staging area south of the harbor. Some of the dredge material will be used to fill in the old outer entrance channel for environmental enhancement. The features of the Corps project are shown on Sheet 5. The Corps feasibility study was submitted through the Corps Division and Headquarters offices to Congress for authorization. The project was authorized in the 1999 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 106-53. Following authorization, the Federal portion of the project is funded in annual Corps appropriations bills. Full Federal funding has been secured. The construction plans and specifications are complete with actual construction expected to begin the fall of 2003. 5.0 Development Plan Selection 5.1 General Fifteen different plan layouts with additional variations of specific features were developed and evaluated to arrive at the final Development Plan. As noted in the Public Involvement Chronology, these plans were presented and comments received leading to the three best plans. Several continents included additional float layout proposals to be considered. Many of the ideas presented in the public meetings were incorporated into �11) Page 12 of 34 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide `� the final plan. The best of the three plans, with several additional modifications, became the final development plan. 5.2 Criteria and Criteria Evaluation Criteria were developed to assist in determining the best overall plan. These included the float layout, satisfying moorage demand, plan cost, economic impact to the community, phasing flexibility, environmental and permit aspects, and land use aspects. Additionally, the public involvement process raised a number of issues, which included the need for more parking, new and improved public restrooms and showers, launch ramp improvements, maneuvering within the harbor and boat slip sizes. These criteria and issues are further described below. Most criteria and issues are not exclusive of one another. For example, the float layout will also have an impact on satisfying the moorage demand, plan costs, slip sizes and inner harbor maneuvering. Float Layout — Three of the last developed float layouts were compared and evaluated. One, Plan M, favored linear transient moorage and was championed by the larger commercial harbor users. Another, Plan O, favored adding as many additional slips as possible. The third, Plan N, was a compromise of the other two. Most stakeholders favored Plan N, the compromise plan, which retained about the same transient moorage, but added additional slips. All plans made significant improvements to upland facilities and docks. A minor revision to Plan N (a result of public comment) increased parallel moorage as shown below. Sheet 6 of the drawings shows the concept float layouts for Plans M, N and O. Moorage Demand — The moorage differences are shown in Table 6. Table 6 — Moorage Summary Item Plan M Plan N Plan O Total Slips 573 630 672 Net Increase Slips 51 108 150 Transient Moorage 4210 3935 2460 Net Increase 1033 758 -717 Transient Moorage Total Lineal Feet 27376 29463 29042 of Moorage Plan N increases both transient and slip moorage. PlanCost Preliminary cost estimates were developed for each plan. A summary of their costs is shown in Table 7. l J P.— 11 of 1d Table 7 — Cost Summary Item Plan M Plan N Plan O Upgrade Old $8,374,000 $8,417,000 $8,417,000 New Expansion $9,593,000 $7,586,000 $8,028,000 Upland Improvements $3,227,000 $3,227,000 $3,227,000 Mob/Demob, E&D $6,881,000 $6,663,000 $6,794,000 S&A, Contingencies Total Cost $28,075,000 $25,8193,000 $26,466,000 Based on these preliminary costs, Plan N is the least overall cost. It should be noted, however, that the differences in cost between each plan is also within the degree of accuracy of the total estimate, indicating that all plans are approximately the same. The final cost will vary from these preliminary estimates. Economic Impacts — There are several things to consider. 1) the ability for the harbor to generate income and 2) the potential for growth in the recreational, charter and commercial fishing fleets utilizing the harbor. Transient moorage is rented on a temporary, often short-term basis. There is no guarantee that the space will be utilized on a consistent basis. Therefore there is more risk in relying on the income that would be generated from transient moorage for debt payment. Slip moorage has very little risk, because all slips will be assigned on a full year basis, except for some of the smaller slips (17 - 24 foot slips). The growth potential for the commercial fishing fleet is static with little potential for future growth as things presently stand with fishery regulations now in place. Many of the larger, non -Seward based commercial fishers would use the transient moorage. There is more potential for the small recreational charter fishing fleet to expand. These boats are primarily "Six -Pack" boats that would be assigned slips, which they would retain for the full calendar year. Most of the boats on the waiting list in the 32-foot to 50-foot class are recreational. Even with the harbor expansion, there is insufficient space to accommodate the wait list demand. Therefore, Plan N, with its modest increase in transient moorage and the addition of as many slips as possible makes the most economic sense. Phasing Flexibility — All plans are similar in their ability to be phased. Replacing deteriorated float systems and expanding the float system would be the highest priority. ce..,e_1 emu Piann;na and Develooment Guide ., Page 14 of 34 D and S Float along with new floats in the east expansion area are top priority. The north end docks, SW launch ramp relocation and parking improvements follow respectively. Environmental and Permit Aspects - All plans will be similar regarding environmental and permit aspects. Permits will be needed through the Corps of Engineers to replace and add floats, trestles and bulkheads and to do any in -water work. Items such as a new grid, fill and dredging and disposal will be the most challenging, because they are the most environmentally sensitive. Land Use and Zoning - There are no known land use or zoning issues. The upland improvements will likely need review, but these features are common to each plan, so there is no advantage to any one of the three plans. Parking — During the summer the harbor area is one of the most heavily used areas with regard to the availability of parking spaces. Parking was identified as one of the most critical issues by over 80 percent of the responders to the questionnaire. There is limited parking available, especially during summer weekends, holidays and Salmon Derby time. There is limited adjacent space available to make into parking space. Day parking, in addition to long-term parking, was identified as critical. Many users felt that remote parking would be an acceptable option, but additional temporary loading/unloading zones near the top of the gangways would be needed along with a shuttle service. The Corps of Engineers project will create the south fill area that is designated as parking for vehicles and boat trailers in all plans. This will materially help with harbor area parking. It will however, eliminate some RV parking to the north of the "Fish Ditch". No one plan has an advantage over the others. Public Restrooms and Showers - Public restroom facilities are limited, especially for the influx of summer visitors in the harbor area. The primary location is in the harbormaster's office building, which also includes a few showers. Other locations include the Park Service Headquarters and Kenai Fjord Tours facilities. These facilities are centered around the harbormaster's office. The Development Plan includes relocating the harbormasters office and remodeling the existing building to include a larger public restroom and shower facility. Additional public restrooms are located in the new south parking area and in the existing northwest parking lot. Both of these are planned as minimal seasonal restrooms only. All plans are similar in this regard; therefore, there is no advantage to any one plan. Launch Ramp Improvements - There are now two existing launch ramps in the small boat harbor, one at the NE corner and one at the SW corner of the basin. No changes are anticipated to the NE launch ramp. The SW launch ramp is located immediately adjacent to Fourth Avenue and is a traffic congestion point. During peak times and during the Salmon Derby, the volumes of traffic using this launch ramp overflows onto Fourth Avenue causing congestion. The problem is compounded by north -south traffic on Fourth Avenue, entering traffic from South Harbor, crossing and entry into the south parking lot and large bus traffic using a nearby bus lane. The suggestion was made to c5 r ce,., A cuu Plnnn,no and Development Guide Page 15 of 34 relocate the launch ramp to the old entrance channel area off the eastern end of the new fill. This would move the launch traffic away from Fourth Avenue, in addition to having better trailer parking located nearby. The new location is closer to the entrance channel, is designed to have improved usability (launch and recovery at lower tides), is oriented more in line with the prevailing winds, will have longer loading/unloading docks associated with it and removes the activity from the vehicular congestion point on Fourth Avenue. The relocation received mostly positive comments and therefore was made a part of all plans. Even though there may be manageable problems with the present situation at the existing launch ramp (except for a few days each year), it makes good sense to move the access away from Fourth Avenue for safety, accessibility and efficiency. It also allows for growth in trailerable boats without the eventual impact on Fourth Avenue traffic. There is no advantage to any one plan in this regard. Maneuvering - The original concept for the vessel traffic flow in the expanded harbor had vessels taking sharp turns to the left, then right after entering the harbor. This would be a difficult maneuver for the larger commercial fishing vessels delivering to the fish processor at the north end of the harbor. A float layout was then generated that would angle the main interior access channel straight from the entrance channel to the north end docks, eliminating the sharp turns. This received favor and has been used in all alternatives. This concession to a fixed fairway also segregates the east and west areas of the harbor and necessarily limits the options of developing the harbor basin. Since all plans are similar, there is no advantage to any one plan. In addition, the fuel dock is relocated away from the entrance channel to help relieve congestion in the vicinity of the harbor entrance. Slip Sizes - The existing harbor includes 17 and 24-foot slips. The new harbor float layout considers mostly 32-foot and larger slips with a few 24-foot slips. The loss of the smaller slips became a significant controversy during the later stages of plan development. Additional 40, 50 and 60-foot slips are needed as the trend for these larger vessels increases in the future. Currently, the largest waiting list is the 32-foot category, with growth in the 40-foot class. Space is limited, even in the expanded harbor. Many of the decisions for the fully developed harbor plan were based on the response to the questionnaire combined with emerging national trends. Approximately 75 percent of the responses indicated a "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" to eliminating the smaller, less than 24-foot slips, provided some other arrangement could be made to accommodate these boats. This can be done in several ways. Smaller boats often can be trailered. Boats in the 24-foot category, but less than 32 feet, can be assigned a 32-foot slip. This would require modification to the harbor's operations plan to allow these smaller boats in larger slips. They could be "grandfathered", if already holding a slip assignment. The current City Code allows boats to "overhang" the end of the slip finger. An effort is being made to eliminate this overhang to maintain the minimum fairway widths, especially in the south harbor. If slips and docks are replaced with the anticipation of a 30 plus year service life, it makes sense to plan for the future trends, especially with the limited harbor space available. It also makes sense to plan a migration towards other accommodations for the 17 to 24 foot class, including non-traditional services (dry stack storage) not currently available anywhere in the state. nn . UU Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 16 of 34 5.3 Plan Selection Plans M, N and O were selected for the final evaluation of plan selection. Each plan is similar in its overall characteristics and many of the individual features. The primary difference is in the view toward more linear moorage (Plan M), more slip moorage (Plan O) or a compromise between the two (Plan N). The factors for selecting Plan N are: ✓ Compromise of competing needs (transient vs. slips), ✓ Increases both transient and slip moorage, ✓ Is the least cost based on preliminary cost estimates, ✓ Makes reasonable economic sense (income generating), ✓ Considers issues raised by public input equal to or better than other plans. Positive aspects of Plan N include: ✓ Provides additional slip (108) and transient (758 ft) moorage, ✓ Reuses 600 ft. of X Float for transient moorage immediately, ✓ The "T" Dock and I Dock (Lift Dock) remain essentially the same, ✓ Opportunity for large vessel loading/unloading is possible in NW corner bulkhead, ✓ A 100 ft x 60 ft. drive down loading/unloading float is proposed in NE corner, ✓ Proposes Fuel Dock expansion and relocation away from entrance channel, ✓ No major changes to fish processing dock operations, ✓ Additional small boat transient space on S and K Floats, ✓ Ten additional 100 foot class slips, ✓ Eight 60 foot class slips added, ✓ Main inner harbor access channel is straighter, ✓ Parking is increased by south fill addition with paving and striping, ✓ Launch ramp relocation relieves congestion and traffic interference on Fourth Avenue, ✓ New launch ramp allows lower tide launch and retrieval, ✓ TraveLift® and boat maintenance area at NW corner are improved, ✓ Additional restroom facilities are proposed, ✓ An ADA compliant fishing pier is proposed Several negative aspects of Plan N are: ✓ Smaller slips (<23 ft) will be significantly reduced and may be eventually eliminated when the plan is fully implemented, ✓ Tidal grid is moved to the SMIC or eliminated. Plan N, with its several additional revisions is described below in greater detail. Plan N is recommended as the future development plan for the Seward Small Boat Harbor. 6.0 Development Plan Description 6.1 Background As noted above; the public involvement process generated a number of issues that led to successive iterations of the proposed development plan. Increasing the scope of the project, from just the east harbor float system, to include the entire future harbor development significantly added to the complexity of arriving at a single plan, and a plan that has many compromises. Each feature of the harbor is described below and shown on Sheet 7. The preliminary cost estimate is provided in Appendix A. Since the scope of each phase of the project is yet to be determined, the cost estimate covers the entire project, breaking out each individual feature. 6.2 Float System Layout 6.2.1 Float Layout Criteria The demand for additional moorage for all classes of vessels is greater than can be accommodated in the expanded harbor. It is desired to provide the maximum number of additional slips and transient space in the harbor consistent with good engineering design and harbor layout. The design criteria for the various design considerations are discussed below. Fleet —"The number of vessels seeking moorage in the harbor was determined from the wait list shown in the table below. There is a national trend in the marine industry, both in sales and manufacturing, toward larger and wider boats. This is evident in harbors along the US west coast and is an increasing trend in Southeastern Alaska. The results of the questionnaire showed Uhat 75 percent of those responding agreed at least somewhat that the smaller slips could be eliminated, if "other" arrangements could be made for the smaller boats. Therefore, the minimum new slip size is recommended to be 32 feet with increased emphasis on 40 foot and larger slips. Space for transient vessels will be included to the greatest extent possible for the transient commercial fishing fleet in addition to recreational vessels. Table 8, Wait List by Slip Length Vessel / Slip Length (ft) Number of Vessels 17 2 23 38 32 197 40 97 50 21 75 17 90 4 Page 18 of 34 cP.uard sBH Plannins and Development Guide The charter fishing fleet, primarily the "six-pack" charter boats and a few larger vessels, will utilize the slips. In addition to the wait list there is a desire to provide moorage and facilities for the commercial fishing fleet. Slips in the 60-foot to 100-foot range have been included. Also, linear moorage is provided for larger vessels up to 90 and 120 feet and a drive down dock for loading/unloading and maintenance is included, primarily to address servicing commercial boats. Large commercial fishers include about 30 vessels 37 to 125 feet long with a beam 15 to 35 feet and draft 7 to 13 feet, approaching 15 feet when fully loaded. Approximately 10 are presently in slips. Barges, tugs, ferries and research vessels occasionally use the harbor, most often wintering over. Main Interior Channels — The main channel running diagonally north -south in the central part of the harbor will be a minimum of 150 to 200 feet wide to accommodate the larger commercial fishing vessels accessing the processing docks and "T" dock. A common standard is 5 times the largest beam width for two-way traffic, (5 x 35 = 175 feet). Other access channels to the floats and launch ramps will be a minimum 100 feet, which would accommodate vessels with beams up to 20 feet. Fairways — The layout of marina fairways is often a topic of heated discussion. The actual dimension of the fairway (the distance between the ends of slip finger floats on adjacent docks) should consider several factors: ❑ Environmental (wind, waves and currents) ❑ Vessel maneuverability ❑ Boat handler experience Waves and currents are not significant factors at the Seward Harbor. , Currents during tidal exchange are present, but are not considered significant. Wind is a significant factor. It is well known that the winds blow either northerly or southerly almost exclusively. The slips are laid out in the north/south direction for this reason. The effect of the wind on a boat will depend on the "sail" area presented to the wind, which will usually be the greatest with the wind on the beam. The fairways are cast/west, beam to the winds. Vessels vary in their maneuverability. Twin-screw vessels and those with bow thrusters can maneuver quite well in tight situations. Single screw vessels and most sailboats are quite maneuverable moving forward, but can be notoriously bad when backing and can be significantly affected by winds. Boat handling skills also vary considerably. The Seward Harbor includes recreational boaters that are not as competent as some that have spent many years piloting boats. The current practice in the harbor is to allow boats to extend up to 4 feet beyond the slip finger, which is presently included in the city code for the harbor. The common engineering standard for fairway sizing is to make the clear distance between the boat extremities no less than 1.5 times the longest boat length using that fairway. It is often e Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 19 of 34 increased to 1.75 times the boat length if maneuvering conditions warrant. Larger vessels 50 feet and longer sometimes have fairway widths up to 2 times the vessel length. This distance is needed to allow vessels to safely enter their slip and make turning movements. The American Society of Civil Engineers "Planning and Design Guidelines for Small Craft Harbors" recommends a minimum fairway width of 1.5 times the longest slip. The minimum fairway widths for the Seward Harbor are set at 1.5 times the slip length with no overhang. The fairway widths will be increased as much as possible above the 1.5 factor, if space permits. The city code should be revised to indicate that there is no overhang permitted, with limited exceptions granted by the Harbormaster. Preliminary design layouts utilizing larger factors resulted in the loss of one entire float in the south harbor. With no vessel overhang from the slip fingers, the minimum fairway dimensions would be: Table 9, Minimum Fairway Dimension Slip Length (ft) 1.5 x L Fairway (ft) 60 90 50 75 40 60 32 48 Access lanes to launch ramps will be a minimum 100 feet. Slip Width — Boat sizes have changed over the past 20 plus years with the principle change being the beam width. Slips in the Seward Harbor are doublewide to accommodate two vessels between slip finger floats. The width depends on the vessels to be served, environmental conditions and operator skills plus the judgment of the design engineer. Generally, the minimum distance between slip finger floats has been taken as roughly 2.3 times the width of the vessel for double occupancy. Vessel beam width varies greatly; however, correlations to boat length have been made by others based on statistical research of boat manufacturer's data and inventory of Alaskan harbor users. The following table provides guidelines for the stall spacing assuming the vessel is equal to the slip length. 70 Page 20 of 34 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Table 10, Stall Spacing Guidelines Slip Length (ft) Slip Clear Spacing (ft, double) 75 49.0 60 43.0 50 40.0 40 34.0 32 30.0 The clear spacing above exceeds the minimum values, however, they are considered prudent due to the winds, vessel maneuverability, operator experience, presumption of commercial use especially in the larger slips, variability in vessel beam and minimum width fairways. 6.2.2 Float Layout General The float layout generated the most debate. Many configurations were presented for comment. As a result of the comments received changes were made to resolve concerns expressed and to incorporate as many of the suggestions that were made as possible.. In the end the layout shown is a compromise between competing desires within the still limited space in the expanded harbor. The harbor can be divided into three general areas; 1) the east expansion, 2) the north harbor and 3) the south harbor. Interior access channels must be considered. There are also two general classes of vessels that regularly use the harbor; large commercial vessels in the 60 to 120 foot range and the smaller charter and recreational vessels ranging from skiffs to 40 and 50 feet in length. Sheet 7 shows the Development Plan float layout for the entire harbor. Interior Access Channel The main channel running diagonally north -south in the central part of the harbor will be a minimum of 150 feet wide between X-Float and E-Float and 200 feet wide in other areas to accommodate the larger commercial fishing vessels accessing the fish processing docks and "T"-dock. Access to launch ramps will be a minimum 100 feet, which would accommodate vessels with beams up to 20 feet. Widths would be larger if possible. In this case, limited space makes the access width narrower than desired. East Harbor Float Layout Since this part of the harbor is new, no rehabilitation work is needed for existing floats or docks and a new float system can be designed and installed. A new marginal float, Z-Float, is located as close to the breakwater as possible and extends to and beyond the angle point in the breakwater. Z-Float has five main floats with slips as shown in the following table. Table 11, East Harbor Float System Slip Size Number of Slips 32 36 40 22 50 18 60 8 100 5 120 1 Total Slips 90 Total Transient 1200 feet A 600-foot section of the existing X-Float is relocated to the east harbor also. It parallels the Z-Float and provides linear moorage for the larger commercial fishing vessels that are not accommodated in the new slips. The remaining 150 feet of X-Float will initially remain in place and the _Fuel Dock relocated northward to match up with the remaining X-Float. The fully implemented Development Plan shows the Fuel Dock expanding to 300 feet, double its present length, to better serve the many vessels needing fuel. The new location also removes the Fuel Dock from near the harbor entrance. Both the expansion and relocation of the Fuel Dock will relieve congestion at the entrance. Until the Fuel Dock is expanded, all 750 feet of X-Float remains usable, except for the period it is being relocated. North Harbor Float Layout Most of the north harbor floats were replaced in 2001. However, the Development Plan calls for replacing K-Float with 32-foot slips on the south side and linear transient moorage on the north side. L-Float is demolished. J-Float will be extended as well as E- Float. This configuration leaves ample room for maneuvering around I Dock, the TraveLift® Dock and NW bulkhead area. F-Float will add 20 50-foot fingers to the south side, except where the USCG Cutter Mustang is berthed. The E-Float extension will add 3 100-foot slips, 1 90-foot slip, and 5 !2 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 22 of 34 32-foot slips. J-and K-Floats add 46 new 32-foot slips and 500 feet of linear transient moorage. Approximately 480 feet of transient moorage is lost when F-Float 50-foot slips are installed on the south side. There is no net change in the number of 32-foot slips and an increase of 130 feet of linear transient moorage on floats E through K from the existing float layout. F-Float trades transient moorage for 50-foot slip moorage. Finger floats can be designed into the north (transient) side of K Float, but not constructed to add future flexibility. South Harbor Float Layout The south harbor, Floats S, A, B, C and D, are to be completely replaced and extended along with G-Float. There is insufficient distance between the south breakwater and E- Float to have fairways wider than the 1.5 times the slip length and retain all the existing floats. If the southwest launch ramp remains in its present location, one float with all of its slips will be lost, but wider fairways will be gained. The Development Plan relocates the launch ramp and saves the present float layout with at least the minimum fairway width. S-Float will be designated for 25-foot class boats (or could be transient). S-Float has 38 25-foot slips, A Float has 64 32-foot slips, B Float has 72 32-foot slips, and C- Float has 42 32-foot slips on the south side and 38 40-foot slips on the north side. D- Float has 88 40-foot slips. All main floats are extended. This is a gain of 68 40-foot slips over the existing layout with a loss of 44 17-foot, 19 23- foot and 2 32-foot slips in the south harbor area of the harbor. Float Layout Summary Table 12 provides a summary of the change in slips and linear moorage for the Development Plan. Table 12, Summary of Slips Existing Harbor Development Plan Slip Size Slips Wait List Slips Change 17 foot 66 2 0 -66 23 foot 57 38 38 -19 32 foot 203 197 307 104 40 foot 122 97 212 90 50 foot 53 21 93 40 60 foot 0 NA 8 8 75 foot 8 22 8 0 90 foot 12 NA 11 -1 90+ foot 1 NA 12 11 Linear feet 3,177 NA 3985 808 Total Slips 522 377 689 167 Page 23 of 34 6.3 Float System Design The Preliminary Design Study Report completed in January 2000 for the recently completed north harbor float replacement project reviewed various float systems, recommending monolithic concrete floats used to replace the previously existing timber floats. These floats have worked very well for the few years thal" they have been installed. This Planning and Development Guide continues to recommend the same style monolithic concrete floats be used for new and replacement floats in future harbor projects. and 9 describe the float and pile system. New Concrete Float Design (J-Dock) Sheet S The procedure for the north harbor float design and construction worked very well giving the City of Seward control of the process rather than the construction contractor. The city, with their engineers, developed a concept float design and layout. This was then advertised in a Request for Proposals for final design and construction. Concrete float builders submitted proposals, which the city evaluated and awarded to the best float design and quality. An installation contractor was then selected by the standard bid procedure to transport and install the floats along with the utilities and gangways. This same two-phase procedure is recommended again to insure the city has the best opportunity to control the type and quality of float for future harbor projects. As with most projects there are "lessons learned" and desired changes that come from experience with the design, construction and operation of the float system. Many of these have been identified and will be incorporated into future float projects. The project cost is estimated on a square foot basis. Potable Water A detailed review of both internal and external mounted water lines was done in the Preliminary Design Study Report for the North Harbor Repair and Renovation project. That report recommended an externally mounted potable water system. This report concurs with the earlier report and further recommends the externally mounted water system. Additional review will be done during the final design to identify problems areas and concerns of the new water system Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide 74 Potable Water Riser 1 Page 24 of 34 design and operation experience. Plan review and certification to operate the water system will be required from the State Department of Environmental Conservation. Details for the potable water system are shown on Sheet 10 of the drawings. Fire Protection The City of Seward has adopted the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and associated State amendments as the model code for fire protection standards. The UFC essentially requires a standpipe type fire protection system. In addition to the UFC, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has several standards that must be considered. The following NFPA standards apply: ❑ NFPA 303, Marinas and Boat Yards ❑ NFPA 307, Construction and Fire Protection of Marine Terminals, Piers and Wharves, ❑ NFPA 14, Standpipe and Hose Systems On Float Fire Valve The existing replacement floats followed the above codes and standards. The fire protection system for new or replaced floats and refurbished docks will also follow these same codes and standards. The codes and standards will again be reviewed along with experience with the existing new system during the final design stage. A dry standpipe system is recommended. Sheet 11 of the drawings describes the fire protection system. Sewer System Additional marine pump -out capability will be needed for the east harbor expansion and south harbor. Specific locations will be defined during final design; however, convenient locations at the head of the floats will receive strong consideration The existing system experienced a number of significant problems, including corrosion of controls and freezing of the in -float sewer lines. A detailed review of the existing sewer system and the problems that were encountered will be necessary for the new designs to prevent reoccurrence of the problems that were encountered. It is expected that new sewer systems will be limited to summer only use and be purged each fall to insure no freezing damage occurs. It will be reactivated each spring after the potential for freezing is past. A plan review and certificate to operate the sewer system will be required from the State Department of Environmental Conservation. �3 Crward SRH Planning and Development Guide Page 25 of 34 Sheet 12 of the drawings shows a typical sewer system layout. in the final design. Power and Li tinQ All boat slips will be configured with shore -tie power. Power configurations will vary with 120 volt, 30 ampere, single phase; 208 volt, 30 ampere, single phase; and 208/120 volt, 50 ampere, three phase. Special configurations will be provided where required for large vessels. There will be capability to configure shore -tie pedestals to supply more than one voltage configuration. All power will be served from utility transformers on shore, near the pedestrian approaches to the harbor. Power distribution cables will be routed beneath the approaches, down the gangways, and into the float distribution panels. Typical details of gangway installations are included on Sheet 13. Details will be provided Power Pedestal With Light All shore -tie pedestals will be new. Sheet 13 illustrates the preferred pedestal style utilized in the North Harbor Repair and Renovation project. Several issues were discovered regarding the construction of the pedestal that will need to be addressed by the manufacturer. Both duplex style units, intended to be located midway between slip floats, and single style units will be considered. Energy consumption is monitored at each pedestal and billed to the customer, accordingly. The pedestals will be configured with digital style meters. The receptacles specified for the pedestals will be conventional locking style as stipulated by the National Electrical Code. Circuit breakers will be "bolt - on" style to minimize corrosion at their connection to the terminals. Lighting will be integrated into the shore -tie pedestal to maintain consistency with the North Harbor installation. This design has proven to be cost effective and efficient. The luminaries are mounted at a height of about 4-feet above the deck. The luminaries will utilize metal halide lamps with good life expectancy qualities. Additional luminaries will be required on the approaches and gangways. 6.4 Gangways and Trestles New or newly remodeled inner harbor facilities are required to be compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) rules and guidance published in September 2002. At a minimum, 80-foot gangways, similar to those recently installed at F and J- Floats, will be provided at pedestrian access points to the float system. Timber trestles will be designed or existing trestles modified to acceptthe new gangways. These will be similar to the recently completed E, F and J-Float trestles. r. C S Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 26 of 34 A new gangway and trestle will be constructed for Z-Float and S- ' Float. The S-Float gangway will parallel G-Float leading to the new parking area fill. The B-Dock trestle will be reconstructed and a new 80-foot covered gangway installed, similar to those in the New Aluminum Gangway - J Dock at Extreme new north harbor. The existing D- High Tide Float trestle will be reconstructed and the existing aluminum gangway reused in that location. The relocated X-Float will have a new timber trestle and reuse the old B-Dock 60 foot gangway for access, to be modified and replaced with and 80-foot aluminum gangway when funds are available. New landing floats will be necessary at each location. The existing access to X-float will remain as -is for the fuel float relocation and extension, also to be modified and replaced with a new 80 foot aluminum gangway when funds are available. See Sheets 14 and 15 of the drawings for details of the proposed gangways and trestles. 6.5 Launch Ramps The existing NE launch ramp will remain as is with maintenance and upgrades as necessary. The SW launch ramp is proposed to be relocated to the east at the east end of the new parking fill area. The new launch ramp will have 4 15-foot lanes and 3 floats, two at 320 feet and one at 445 feet long. This will provide significant additional room for temporary docking during loading and unloading and launching and retrieval activities. The ramp itself will be 160 feet long on a 13% slope with the F:icrinv Sw r,Ann�h Rmm�. end of the ramp at —8 feet MLLW, deep enough that most launch -and retrievals will be able to be -done during minus tides. See Sheet 16 for a concept drawing of the launch ramp and Sheet 7 for the location. The relocation concept was received as a comment during one of the open house sessions and received many positive comments. The new location moves the access to the ramp off Fourth Avenue, the main thoroughfare in the harbor business district. Fourth Avenue can be an extremely busy and congested area, especially during summer weekends and Salmon Derby. The new fill parking area will also provide close convenient parking for many of the vehicles with trailers. Reduced congestion from the launch and retrieval traffic, a new deeper all tide ramp, planning for increased future use and the ability to w� Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 27 of 34 retain all the existing floats on the west side of the south harbor with adequate fairway widths make the relocation a good choice. 6.6 Parking Areas South Parking Area The fill south of the existing south breakwater is being developed by the city with the Corps of Engineers project to be used for additional harbor parking for both vehicles and boat trailers. Once the dredge disposal fill has settled, classified surface course and asphalt paving can take place_ Appropriate traffic routing, striping and landscaping will maximize the utilization for this area. Additionally, a minimum restroom facility, trash and used oil receptacles are planned near the relocated launch ramp. It is recommended this area remain parking only and not available for upland business development. Northeast Parking Area The Development Plan proposes to pave and stripe the existing parking area to maximize the parking capacity. A small fill will be constructed as part of the Corps project. Redevelopment of the near shore uplands and some utilities work will be required. The existing restroom facilities and other facilities are not expected to be disturbed. See drawing Sheet 17 for representative parking layouts. 6.7 TraveLift® and Maintenance Area The present lift pit is located adjacent to the I -Dock (Lift Dock). The TraveLi$® must make two 90-degree turns to reach the minor maintenance area or Port Avenue to access the other storage and maintenance yards north of the harbor. Lift activities frequently compete with the fish processing activities in this area. It is proposed that a bulkhead be placed in the northwest corner of the harbor from the existing sheet pile bulkhead to the I Dock and include a new lift pit within the bulkhead. The new pit would be located at the end of Leirer Avenue, eliminating the two 90-degree turns and be immediately adjacent to the minor maintenance area. The new pit would be designed to the dimensions of a new 50-ton capacity TraveLiftO, which would be included with the new facilities. The maintenance area presently has a gravel surface and unacceptable water and power facilities. The Development Plan calls for initial grading of the area providing for good drainage to a surface water collection system that will remove any grits and floating contaminates, disposing of the "cleaned" water appropriately. Paving will be done when the funding is available. The area will also be fenced and power and water pedestals provided for each pair of maintenance stalls. A total of eight stalls would be available. Best Management Practices for maintenance activities will be required for use of the area. Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 28 of 34 In addition to the TraveLiftO and maintenance area, the area on the harbor side of the bulkhead would be dredged to —15 feet MLLW. The bulkhead would be fitted with fender piles and then used for one larger commercial vessel to load and unload between the lift pit and the I -Dock. Several alternatives for the bulkhead have been considered. Initial analysis indicates the tied back bulkhead appears the best. Details are shown on Sheet 18 of the drawings. 6.8 I -Dock (Lift Dock) The I -Dock is in very poor condition. The decking is extremely worn with many patched holes. The utilities are old and in poor, unusable or unsafe conditions. Mooring cleats have been over stressed and pulled out of alignment. The piling and substructure are probably in reasonably good condition. A thorough inspection would be the initial step in determining the extent of repair/rehabilitation necessary. Existing Maintenance Area I -Dock and TraveLiftO Pit The Development Plan proposes to demolish the lift pit portion of the dock and rehabilitate the remaining dock in its present configuration. The rehabilitation will include removing the existing decking, bullrails, utilities and other items down to the stringers. Any stringers and X-bracing needing replacement will be replaced and new decking, bullrails and utilities will be installed. The existing crane will then be reinstalled. The refurbished dock will provide space for large commercial vessels on both sides and the end, becoming the primary fish processing dock, leaving most of the city "T"-Dock for transient loading and unloading, fueling and related non -fish processing activities. Concept plans are shown on Sheet 18. �9 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 29 of 34 6.9 City "T"-Dock The "T"-Dock is also in fair to poor condition. The surface decking is in well-worn condition. The utilities are in very poor condition. As they fail, they are being removed and not replaced. As with the I -Dock, the substructure and piling are believed to be in reasonably good shape, although there are several broken fender piling. The "'r'-Dock is heavily used for loading and unloading, fueling and temporary moorage for large commercial vessels, primarily fishing vessels. A complete condition survey of the dock is the first step to determining the extent of repairs that would be needed. The Development Plan proposes to demolish the "T" , end of the dock and rehabilitate the remaining structure. Extension of J and K-Docks can't be done with City "T"-Dock the "T' section in place, since the additional room now available is needed for vessel maneuvering. As with the I -Dock, the existing decking, bull rails and utilities will be removed and replaced along with any fender piling. The utilities would be replaced to current code and standards for commercial vessels. The fueling station would be relocated to the rehabilitated portion of the dock. The reconstructed dock would then become a transient loading, unloading and fueling location for the larger commercial vessels. Sheet 20 of the drawings provides concept plans. 6.10 North Harbor Bulkheads The Development Plan proposes to add bulkheads along the northern perimeter of the harbor from the "T"-Dock to the new Corps breakwater, with the exception of the existing northeast launch ramp. The current concept plans are functional without these bulkheads for the most part, although the drive down float and dry stack storage would likely include the bulkheads. b (�Imilar Drive Down Float, Sitka, Alaska Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 30 of 34 to load and unload supplies and equipment or do minor maintenance. Only temporary short term mooring would be permitted and no overnight mooring. The float would be 60 feet wide by 100-feet long, held in place by steel piling and have an approximately 100 foot steel bridge/gangway accessing the NE parking area. The float and bridge would be similar to the drive down dock in Sitka, Alaska, which is heavily used by boats. Sheet 21 of the drawings shows the concept schematic. 6.12 Tidal Grid The harbor did have a tidal grid in the northeast corner until the flood in the fall of 1995. At that time, the grid was buried by sediment washed into the basin by the flood. The grid was never uncovered, primarily because of the high cost of potential contaminated soil disposal. No new grid is proposed for the small boat harbor. Space in the small boat harbor for a grid that would be easily accessible for the larger boats is very limited. It is proposed that a new grid be developed in the Seward Marine Industrial Center basin, after the basin is enclosed with a wave barrier. This would provide a more accessible location for larger vessels and reserve the small boat harbor for all -tide docks. The trip to the SMIC for a tide cycle shouldn't be a significant issue and would put the major maintenance area in a compatible industrial area. Sheet 4 of the drawings shows the SMIC basin with a proposed grid location. 6.13 Fish Cleaning Facilities New fish cleaning facilities are proposed for the NE harbor, near the access trestle for Z-Float. This will improve these facilities for the new floats and those using the launch ramps. A new fish cleaning facility is also proposed near the relocated SW launch ramp. This facility are envisioned be smaller than, but with a similar configuration to the existing Fig h C 1rAnino CtAtinn 51t.i-1)nrlc new fish cleaning stations at B and J- Docks. Alternatively, floating fish cleaning facilities may be considered. Concept drawings based on the new existing fixed fish cleaning stations are shown on Sheet 22 of the drawings. i 4Z . nrd sFt14 Plannine and Development Guide Page 31 of 34 6.14 Restroom Facilities North Restroom Facility The questionnaire and many public meetings and workshops identified a significant user desire to have public restrooms located somewhere near the northwest comer of the harbor. The Development Plan proposes to locate a minimum seasonal restroom facility in the NW parking lot over the old RV dump station. This is about the only location available and would be relatively easy to connect to the city's sanitary sewer system. Sheet 23 of the drawings shows a concept for these facilities that has been used by the National Park Service. Detail design should provide for a quality facility, but one that is as vandal resistant as possible also. South Parking Area Restroom A similar restroom facility is proposed for the south parking area fill. The location is not specifically selected, but should be convenient for people using the launch ramp and the beach area at the south end of the harbor. A cash dumpster would also be co -located. This facility would also be seasonal, closed during the winter months. 6.15 Dry Stack Boat Storage Dry stack boat storage is a means to store smaller boats (less than 32 feet) on land in storage racks. Specially designed lift trucks with padded forks lift the boats from a hydraulic launcher/retriever and place them in racks on shore. When the owner wishes to use their boat, they call and arrange to have the boat taken from its rack and placed in the water. When the owner is finished using their boat, it is again lifted out and stored in the rack. There is a certain perceived inconvenience to having to make arrangements for launching and retrieval. This was the case in several public harbors outside of Alaska, yet the concept has proven to work well and meets or exceeds the customer's needs. There are many advantages to storing small boats out of the water also. Facilities vary, but usually include the storage racks, launch/retrieval forklift and hydraulic launcher designed for launch/retrieval operations. Racks can be covered with or without wails in several configurations. Launch/retrieval methods vary also. A covered, heated, 150-boat capacity facility is envisioned. The dry stack storage concept needs a more in depth economic evaluation prior to implementation, since it is a new concept for Alaska. It is believed to have excellent potential, if smaller boats will utilize this storage method rather than wet storage in a slip. It is also recognized that not all small boat owners would utilize the dry stack storage facilities. Several photos of a representative dry stack storage operation and a concept plan for the Seward harbor are shown on Sheet 24 of the drawings. ►I Page 32 of 34 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide 6.16 ADA Accessible Fishing Pier An ADA accessible fishing pier is planned for the south side of the south parking fill in the vicinity of the culverts to the "Fish Ditch". The rocky slope configuration of the beach restricts the handicapped from fishing in this area. Specific plans have not been developed, but the pier is envisioned as a "T" shape end with railings designed to allow wheelchair bound people the opportunity to fish. The pier will also provide an observation location for the public to watch the fishing action and boats entering and leaving the harbor. The design will also require special considerations for its location within the heavy wave zone. A concept for the pier is shown on Sheet 25 and a representative location on Sheet 17. 6.17 Harbormaster's Office and Shop The existing harbormaster's office and shop is located in the center of the harbor tourist and business area. The building is still functional, but could use significant remodeling and code and safety upgrades. The Development Plan relocates the harbor offices and shop to a new building where the SW launch ramp is presently located following relocation of these launch ramps. The slope would be filled in and the building placed on piling with the harbor side looking out over the harbor, giving the harbor staff a clear view of harbor activities. The pedestrian boardwalk that extends through most of the west side of the harbor would connect to a boardwalk on the harbor side of the new building. While it's not as centrally located as some have suggested, especially to the east harbor slips, it will be accessible to the gangways at S-Float and B-Float from all the west side floats. The addition of parking spaces adjacent to the offices enhances the ability of customers to conduct business with the harbor department. The proposed location is shown on Sheet 7 of the drawings. No specific concepts have been developed for the offices and shop, although it is envisioned to have the general offices, counter and shop on the ground level with offices and conference rooms on the upper level. One of the significant issues revealed from the questionnaires was the need for more and better restroom and shower facilities. The old office and shop building would be available to be renovated into a small tourist information office and expanded shower and restroom facilities. 7.0 Plan Implementation 7.1 Implementation The Planning and Development Guide presents the current vision for the Small Boat Harbor and immediate surrounding area, specifically related to commercial (primarily fishing, and charter) and recreational boaters and harbor activities. It includes the future n ry G J c...m cuu Plannine and Development Guide Page 33 of 34 development of the entire harbor and certain upland facilities. it does not cover commercial and tourist activities and facilities in the harbor area. The overall plan has been approved by the City Council. (See Appendix E) Funding for the full development plan is not available. Future harbor capital projects will be undertaken as funds become available using this document as a guide. It is expected that the plan presented in this document will be updated from time to time as new needs and opportunities appear and as the various intermediate projects are completed. Future projects will be completed incrementally in phases. Implementation of each phase will include the following normal operating procedure. ❑ A phase will be identified by the Harbormaster and his staff ❑ The Port and Commerce Advisory Board (PACAB) will review and approve the phase, recommending it to the City Council, ❑ The City Council will review and approve the phase and funding Public input will be a part of the process during special public meetings and at both the PACAB and City Council stages prior to final approval for construction. 7.2 Phase I There is an immediate need for work within the harbor. As noted previously, the Corps of Engineers is proceeding with the City to expand the harbor. New floats will be needed for the expanded harbor. Additionally, deteriorating floats in the south harbor are in need of replacement. The requirements described above for review and approval by the PACAB and City Council will be followed for Phase I. Phase I is expected to include: ❑ The floats in the east harbor expansion, ❑ The relocated X Float and Fuel Dock, ❑ Fingers on the south side of F Float and a New and extended D Float. An addition to Phase I, if funds are available, would include a bulkhead in the northwest comer of the basin, that would include new TraveLift® facilities and a new TraveLift® plus the rehabilitation of I -Dock and the City "T"-Dock. 7.3 Future Phases Future phases have not been prioritized at this time. However, future phases will be primarily based on need for maintenance and upgrades to meet demand. Repairing and replacing deteriorated floats, docks and other facilities will be primary considerations. G4 Seward SBH Planning and Development Guide Page 34 of 34 �4 ♦ . i t tr. .. y iS:,:A Ir � I'' i �..9 .r.,.w...._ r_.-,.Y:_"r��.✓.sit.n,:,L.w.4,.v..:.:as..rcv,..r..fa,_�.t.N.._:is.r...h. �,�u.L:'.i'?u.Y:l. i s, ry � INryF � 4C v.u.j '..£� l.:l�•� L � � 8F.3��G"'4._�.--._`"p ..ti„r, y�1$`. r�43 ..iu. c. .�.F•$n-_ s p.� aJ �y��• �'� '9tll LC. 49 UIL 47 T,ye3 �=y_eg�.na Y" .1 e. Ifi n i .n YD •� � LM -24 x ..s . .. —14 Y. I.a WI ..Lp • f }_Y �M'IJJf aaaapp��la V j .. , "'a YIARIR 9'Qo +a rw .ai ram. ,m 3 WAVE BARRIER CONCEPT SITE PLAN WAtE: N.T.S. ..IC. CGI.1Mr I A! l.rllOY♦Y1[ TYP. WAVE BARRIER SECTION 7YP. WAVE BARRIER ELEVATION xa�: ara xxt M.rs. TYPICAL WAVE BARRIERS x� sw mmossco m TIDAL INFORMATION unaa ,oe ,ur W .M� YR1 Lt .Sfl6t ,A1 -1JC DESIGN WAVE ro.m ••' G4 s 3A j j PU4 MARINE INDUS NT GWDEINDUSTRIAL 4 f 2$ �� SEWARD MARINE INpIlSTRIAL CENTER mw— I MAIN MA9tA o—m � k cif! � �� P _ � � � � �. �XwC __ yi .0� ��lf U yyy w- ��r�u_ GO/iGRFTF FLOAT NOTE xE 1. ALL FLOAT DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO DEPICT NOT CONI'MRATION. ATED ON THESE PLANS ARE STALL FLOAT STRUCTURAL a MST:s sX., UTNJTY PEDESTAL SEE EIECTRIGV. PLANS SHEET 13 S 1/8' X 4 1/2' GIA M BtJUPAL 4 1/2'/ X 3 1/2' TALL U— SCUPPER BLOCK. TYP. 3 X B RUBSTRIP. COLINTERSMK BOLT HEADS �- (2) Yo PNO ELECT. SWEEPS TO POWER CENTER. TIP. (1) 1'Y PYC COMM. SWEEP To POWER CENTER. TYP- (1) 1'r PVC HANDHOLE DRAIN RmFORCED CONCRETE FLOAT POLYUREIHWE-COATED .. POLYSTYRENE FLOTATION i TYPICAL STALL FLOAT SECTION scALE. 1' - v SEWARD PLANNING ' MONOLI' SMALL BOAT NO DEVELOP' HIC CC FLOAT GALV. SEEL MOMM CLEA 3 X B RUSS, P 3/4'I ECONOMY HEAD BOLT. TYP. REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOAT PDLYVRETHMIE-COATED POLYSTYRENE FLOTATION RETE s 9EET 8 Z �[ r S IS YP FA FLOAT PN.E a" OFF . � +24 SEE TIOAL WORMATION TABLE its/, : 16% h W00/2* WALL GALV- STEEL FLOAT PILE V W` FWiGE E 5110E 1 PLES F INSTALLATION DETAILS tOESRED EMBED. ELEVATXIN LENGTH 25, -W �. PILE DETAIL -12rTO -15' MLLW TO TIDAL NNF RMATION ESi1LNTED MAX. NIGH WATER 15.09 NHHW 10.58' M11W 9A7 LRL 5.52 MLLW 0.0 ESTIMATED MAX. LOW WATER -C %n/LLa Oc , 1 SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE 8 STEEL FLOAT PLEB ! 2E we r MAN FLOAT NAY WATER SYSTEM PLAN APPROX. 26• 3/ • OVAL HOSE Will w VACUME BREAKER SUPPORTS ® M e) I 1B• M. FOR PIPE EXPANSION/COHIRAG" 1• sc RISER BULLF Ss U—BOLT CONNECT SAFETY UK AT BOTH LOCATKM uNEmol PIPE oMG w )� (4) Ell % XJ• GAM LAG SCREWS 7FMCIC GUARD FABRICATED FROM Y 1Bo.o. SCHEDULE m rxv. i AND I/j CA.V. It 0 0 1 •x'/� CAM REDUCMG ELLEIm /e'.I% T318 S.S. U—BDLT (2) EA. '/�i � HOLE TYPICAL WATER SERVICE RISER SCAM N.T.S. J 4 SEWARD SMALL BOAT MAKt31 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT( WATER SYSTEM PLATE VE CONNECT IO of 1AA BNiBEO NIPPLE PPORTS FIRE SEERRVICCE SYPHgON RISER SEE � � M FIRE SERVICE CHARGE VALVE SEE LIFE RING CABINET MOUNTING AND FABRICATION SIMILAR TO FIRE EMINGAS14ER CARNET LIFE RIjN'G�y W & H TO BE DETERMINED BY MANUFACTURER ...�. ATn LLR ILMtl r�eNEF FWdd 1. PROVIDE 2011, FIRE EMINGUISHERS RATED FOR 2A' 20-9:C AT EACH HOSE STATION. EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AN APPROVED ENCLOSURE WHICH SHALL BE RED N COLOR h HAVE A LOCKABLE 'BREAK GLASS' INTERNAL. HANDLE DEVICE - CHEYENNE PRODUCTS III FEH-L OR EOIAY. HOT DIP GALVANIZE CABINET FRAMES AFTER FABRICATION. 2. LOCATE FIRE EXINGUISHER CABINET NEAR WHARF HYDRANTS AS GENERALLY NOTED ON SHEET C7. CLEAR DISTANCESNALL BE 2' OR AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. AVOIO CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND OTHER FLOAT APPURTENANCES. 3. LIFE RING CABINETS MUST MEET U.S. COAST GUARD STANDARDS FOR DOCK APPLICATION. LIFE RING CABINETS SHALL CONTAIN A THROWABLE PERSONAL FLOATATION DEVICE MEETING USCG REQUIREMENTS. CABINETS SHALL BE MADE OF FIBERGLASS OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL AS MANUFACTURED BY CHEYENNE PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EOLIAL. LIFE RING CABINET SHALL Be YELLOW N COLOR. ♦. LOCATE LIFE RING CABINETS EVERY 200 FEET ON ALL MAIN FLOATS AT MID -STALL LOCATIONS GENERALLY NOTED ON SHEET C7. AVOID CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND OTHER FLOAT APPURTENANCES. TiNGUISHER/LIFE RING CABINETS LIFE RING (TYPICAL) MRF HYDRANT RAISER V AWN FLOATS YPICAL) E EXT94GLJISHER 31NET (TYPICAL) FIRE SERVICE STATION BASER TYPICAL AT END OF WIN FLOA I SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR rpq:E PLANNING AND DEV=LOPMENT GUIDE t FILE PROTEC 4 1 0 ul U) �4 F } W E] 4 a •.R.a GANGWAY ELEVATION -HIGH TIC ELEVATION -LOW ! co ♦ .. i an „ta a a.ae[ e EOEYR�IM�pAp[� R\ f[ pN0 ra wn alww y ai �^ GANGWAY - CROSS SECTION srxe PLY 0 n ENLARGED DETAIL -HIGH TIDE wEc: ,n. _ ,._,. [� ENLARGED DETAIL -LOW TIDE n na a+e RUL awul y aw ao.R E.,a•[m urwc R•ax ..UR. crm a'r nc tear. IA@[ .max mr1 tY !1l' IYIOIa[ OIN[I .a® aolOm[ nm �IMFz BECTRIC/1L DETAI-8 C 011EYLTIMO rt lIECTRICAL _ [M•IME[R■ 114YIYL ALIT • WFA[R MN� I � RUH FLUATAPPROACH PLAN srxr: x.rs Iq�m OOSIW OI Ip 111�1 lll[iR[ \ M1I�101f Wl ELEVATION sr- Mrs l�lFll A2 �aa was MODIFIED EXISTING OR NEW APPROACH TRESTLE - END VIEW sr c• Iµ•-i•-a• NOTES: i P — ILL — W K — - — OYACIYI r �s Ms SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR PLANHNO MID OEI�ELOPMEN7 CUDE snow _ ww ACCESS TRES I SEW l I slaw F 1b 3 At Ot €es I 3 F�E F . rt }.� .��-i � i • tli L �gyE �E Eta q 3' 11 20.0cr rums xe (DWUN ..H RAMP PLAN (B.§ECTION . KT.L . . . . . . . . . . T— (J)]N rlln.. oo� GAAs scut ce 'ARD SMALL BOAT H NO AND DEVENaT OROOIDE is LUALM"m 726 PU �TRAVELIFT®AND I DOCK PLAN ■n� ATYPICAL DOCK r r Tr~ Y- U 0 'r. Al v A ATYPICAL .!L BULKHEAD MW P" MAW 44)TRAN�EUFT 0. DOCK SCALI� #LT-% 18 125 H �.o.0 .eouws mn . m a =�awrrl roa K 1 � NO Ol/aIOMO �� � ■O.Op OINK 1 lc)0 SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. RE ACE IW2 MWER SULIAMS—%," �r s NOTES: PoTMZ W.%= AM POM M BE RU'LA o. SEE roc 1 SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR ANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE CITY wr DOCK ;NATION : N.T.S. IE CRY T DOCK I mw FLCIAT�N NE PARKWD AREA LOCATION PLAN SCALE. N.T.S. SMALL BOAT HARBOR AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE DRNE DOWN FLOAT TYPICAL FISH CLEANING STATION SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. NOTES: pWENSONS MAY VARY DEPMUNG ON LOCATION AND ORIENTATM "J DPI SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR' PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE / FM CLEAMM / 25 W_ a A 0 I� IU �w \. NWT YMY r. a. a.n rwra aw..ww IT Ms _ , dyl mi� .- _ n h FIR ,� - -6 - Ll :CTION FOR ,TION TO DECK AS REQUIRED NOTES: LOCATION OF THE FISH/OBSERVATION PIER TO BE OETV"NEA- SEE SHEETS 7 AND 17 FOR SUGGESTED LOCATIONS. SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE ADA FISHM AND OBSERVATION PER I 7dEET 25 25 w[ r APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (Included as a separate document under separate cover) 1 Tourism and Recreation in Seward Cruise ship visitation has been a quickly growing component of tourism activity in Seward. Figure 1 shows the number of cruise ship visits over the period from 1991 through 2001. Over this period, the size of cruise ships vessels making landings has grown steadily, contributing to the overall increase in the number of cruise ship visitors. A large number of visitors go to Seward for excursion boat trips, frequently traveling to the Kenai Fjords National Park. The Kenai Fjords National Park has provided data on use levels by excursion boats shown in Table 1. Table 1 Kenai Fiords Excursion Boat Passengers 1996-2001 1996 71,243 1997 67,934 1998 81,538 1999 93,266 2000 86,963 2001 85.047 Table 2 shows the charterboat businesses operating out of Seward for the period from 1998 through 2003. This listing is maintained by the Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission and probably underestimated the number of charterboats. When fishing is poor on the Kenai River or the lower Cook Inlet saltwater areas, some guides shift 1� operations to Seward on a day -use short term basis and will not be reflected in these totals. Table 2 Seward Charterboat O erators 1998-2003 1998 123 1999 128 2000 136 2001 129. 2002 131 2003 124 Data showing total recreational boat use from the Seward harbor is not available. However, the Alaska Department of Fish & Game provides data showing sport fishing effort out of Seward that can be used as a proxy for overall boating trends. This series shows fishing effort from shore and from private boats fishing out of Seward 1988 through 2001. The fishing effort by shorebased anglers has remained fairly steady over this time period. The fishing effort by anglers in private boats increased. through 1995, decreased for several years and appears to be increasing again. Figure 2 shows the trends in sport fishing effort. Figure 2: Seward Area: Sport Fishing Effort by Angler Days 1988 through 2001 100,000 90,000 80,000 r 70,000 as v 60,000 � O) N 50,000 w O 40,000 7 30,000 C 20,000 10,000 0 1988 989 990 7991 1992 1993 1994 995 1996 1997 1998 E99 2000 2001 9 boat ■ shoreline Commercial Fishing in Seward Commercial fishing activities have declined in Seward for more than a decade. Since the peak years of the late 1980's, the commercial fishing industry in Seward has experienced a number of setbacks from a series of unrelated events. These events have included: the Exxon Valdez oil spill; a precipitous decline in salmon prices; implementation of the quota share system for the halibut fishery; restrictions on fishing activity to protect Steller sea lions; and competition for moorage and port services from a quickly growing sport and charter sector. Salmon prices to fishermen and wholesale prices obtained by processing companies have drastically declined primarily due to inroads to Alaska salmon by farmed salmon produced in Chile, Norway and Canada. The trend for fish deliveries to Seward is relatively constant under current conditions. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council put protective regulations for Steller sea lions into place in 2000. If the protection measures are reduced or modified at some point in the future, pollock and Pacific cod vessels could again seek moorage in the Seward Harbor, at least for the period between January 1 and April 1. However, there is no indication that such a change is likely in the near future. Without some relief from the sea lion protection measures, significant growth in ground fisheries off shore of Seward is not likely to occur. The number of Seward commercial fishers has declined steadily since 1989 as shown in Figure 3. Commercial fishing gross revenues, shown in Figure 4, have also similarly declined. Commercial fishing gross revenue for Seward commercial fishers in 2002 was only $3.3 million — the lowest level achieved since 1981. Salmon fishing is an important contributor to the decline in activity. In 2002, there were only 20 Seward commercial salmon fishers, compared with 54 at the peak in 1986. Halibut landings in Seward have increased over the past several years, after declining n the early and mid 1990's. The increase may be attributable to landings of halibut that was previously landed and processed in ports such as Kodiak in the pre -share quota fishery. Seward's position on the road system as well as its active fish processing companies may provide for continued growth in halibut landings. Despite the declines experienced for commercial fishing activities, there is a strong future for commercial fishing in Seward. The port serves a rich and productive part of the Gulf of Alaska, Prince William Sound and outer Cook Inlet. Ocean Beauty Seafoods recently purchased one of the three fish processing plants in Seward, taking over for Cook Inlet Processors, a company that has been financially struggling for several years. Smokey Seafoods purchased Ward's Cove processing plant at Lowell Point this year after Ward's Cove declared bankruptcy. This is an opportune time to provide further impetus for regrowth of Seward's commercial fishing future. With new processing companies locating in reward and the improvements to commercial fishing vessel support outlined in this development plan, the City hopes to regain a portion of the commercial fishing activity that has been lost. is@ off Sponsored by: Erchinger CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2003-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE SEWARD SMALL BOAT HARBOR AREA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE WHEREAS, the City of Seward has long pursued the expansion of the Small Boat Harbor; and WHEREAS, in 1998, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, (USACE) completed a Feasibility Study and an Environmental Assessment for the project, both of which were approved in 1999; and WHEREAS, the Project failed to gain federal funding until FY 2002, when $1 million was appropriated for design and construction. Additionally, the City sought, and received, $2.9 million in matching funds from the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities in 2000 and a $1.3 million Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration grant in 2001; and WHEREAS, the remainder of federal funds, approximately $4.0 million, is earmarked for appropriation in FY2003 and the USACE is preparing contract specifications for construction beginning in the fall of 2003; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 2002, the City of Seward City Council approved Resolution 2002-082 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Tryck Nyman and Hayes, Incorporated (TNH) to provide Public Involvement and Schematic Design Services for the East Harbor Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, during the course of developing the process guidelines, many users suggested and staff concurred that adding a Harbor Area Master Plan component to the contract would take advantage of the large scale effort already in progress and provide an opportunity to plan for the future development of the harbor area; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 2002-119 on November 18`h, 2002, adding Master Plan development services to the existing contract; and WHEREAS, since August 2002, many public meetings were held and information solicited and received through surveys, electronic mail, telephone calls and newsletters; and WHEREAS, the Harbor Department Web Site has contained much of this information as the process progressed; and -L v CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA. RI.SOLUTION 2003-032 NNIHEREAS, the TNH project team and the administration along with a sub- committee of the Pont and Commerce Advisory Board (.PACAB) attempted to blend the many and varied concerns, ideas and user groups into a long term plan benefiting the cuTTenm l and future harbor customers, with an eye toward a positive economic impact far the cornmunity of Seward; and WHEREAS, the culmination of this process is designated Plan N, Revision — 1 which has been reviewed and recommended by PACAB Resolution 2003-01; and WHEREAS, as a result of additional public meetings, minor revisions have been made arxi are reflected in Plan N, Revision — 2 and will he incorporated into the Harbor Area Planning and Development Guide. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED .BY T14E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEW A.RD, ALASKA, that: Section 1. Plan N, Revision - 2, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is approved and adopted for inclusion in the Harbor Area Plamting and Development Guidc. The frill Harbor Area Planning and Development Guide with Plan N, Revision -2 will be presented for adoption when completed. Section 2. This Planning and Development Guide will be accomplished in stages in such a manner that the Small Boat Harbor remains a working harbor at all times; such a requirement means that accomplishment of this plan must he made in phases to assure minimum blockage of travel in and out of slips. Section 3. Prior to the commencement of each phase beginning with the breakwater and for every phase thereafter, depending on funding availability at the time, local market studies, economic analyses, public hearings and technical reviews, a determination will be made of which features or modifications to the model including, but not limited to quantity, size, location and/or design specifications are to be included in the next phase. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the Citv of Seward, Alaska this 28th day of April, 2003. THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASK.A u Clark, Viayor CITY OF MWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2W3-432. AYES: Shafer. Om -Dunham, Brmwtl,. Valdaita, Clark NOES: Norte ABSENT: Amberg ABSTAIN: Now ATTEST: ]can izwza. J �s;tea=aria:r+A ..C*y Clerk.�e 10 (City Seal) 47 A�-p+i1`�4 ., ��'•aqa;tsal�t Sponsored by: City Manager CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA RESOLUTION 2003-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SEWARD, ALASKA, ESTABLISHING DESIGN PRIORITIES FOR HOBEN PARK WHEREAS, Hoben Park is a culturally and historically significant property; and WHEREAS, between the 1920's and the 1940's Hoben Park had a distinctive landscape with a functional water fountain, wrought iron fence, a level grass lawn, several concrete pedestal planters, historic lampposts and some bird houses; and WHEREAS, many of the previous amenities need to be restored to reestablish the integrity of the visual aesthetics of the original historic landscape; and WHEREAS, the Park now has a beautiful poplar tree as its centerpiece which needs to be preserved; and WHEREAS, the priorities for restoration shall start with installation of the historic lamp posts, replacing the fountain and restoring the original fountain basin and pedestal, installing historically accurate replica fencing of a safe height along the North and West side, reconstruction of the historic concrete planters, flower gardens (where appropriate) using Alaskan flora, benches (where appropriate) and bird houses, as funding becomes available; and WHEREAS, the restoration of Hoben Park to the simple and elegant design it had during its period of historic significance will emphasize Seward's appreciation of local history and natural beauty. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEWARD, ALASKA, that: Section L The City Council finds that it is in the best interests of the City of Seward to preserve the integrity of the poplar tree and restore the amenities of Hoben Park as it was during the park's period of historic significance, the 1920's to the 1940's. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City of Seward, Alaska this 11th day of August, 2003. Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: August 11, 2003 Through: Phil Shealy, City Manager From: Malcolm G. Brown, Planner Karin Sturdy, Parks & Recreation Director Agenda Item: A Recommendation to City Council on Historical Reconstruction of Hoben Park BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: In the fall of 2002 Council expressed concern about the health of the poplar tree (commonly referred to as a cottonwood) in Hoben Park. Consideration was given to park benches, flower gardens, a new fountain, and pathways some of which would be paved. The Parks and Recreation Department then obtained a report from an arborist. The report states that the tree is healthy in spite of a wound on the South side caused by a limb that broke off. The report recommends that precautions be taken to ensure its continued good health. The arborists report pointed out that soil compaction under the tree could damage the root network, and recommended keeping improvements away from the tree. on June 23rd, 2003, City Council discussed development options for Hoben Park. Council was concerned that the improvements under or near the tree could be attractive nuisances which draw the public into a potential fall zone. The tree does have the potential to be labeled a hazard, like all trees. Consequently, Council's discussion determined that more public input was needed and that the Planning and Zoning Commission was an appropriate venue. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public work session at Hoben Park on July la to learn more about the development alternatives, and they discussed the topic as New Business at the regularly scheduled July I' meeting. The Commission held a Special Meeting on July 15a' in order to formally consider the development alternatives for the Park. The Planning and Zoning Commission received a significant amount of public input regarding the fate of the tree and how to proceed with the park design. Many within the community wish to retain the tree for historical, aesthetic, environmental, erosion control and many other reasons. Undoubtedly, there are some who would like to see the tree removed, however no public comment has been received to support removing the tree. An interesting point of emphasis was provided by a local archeologist, Tim Sczawinski, 21) who stated that several years ago when construction was done in the park many artifacts were found, and that caution should be taken to ensure compliance with the Antiquities Act. His conversations with National Park Service archeologists have reinforced his claims that the Phoenix was built in that area of Seward. The Planning and Zoning Commission determined that keeping the integrity of the poplar tree and working towards a historical restoration of the landscape as it was during the 1920-1940's time period should guide the policy for development. All other aspects of the park improvements would support the preservation of the tree and the historical reconstruction. The criteria for a historic landmark needs to be used as guidance. When viewing the photographs of historic Hoben Park, one sees `simple elegance' in limited park amenities. The photographs show the well maintained lawn, the fountain, the lamp posts, ornamental flower planters, bird houses and some shrubs and trees. The Commission prioritized the development as follows: 1. installation of the historic lamp posts, and 2. replacing the fountain and restoring the original basin and pedestal, and 3. installing historically accurate replica fencing of a safe height along the North and West side, and 4. reconstruction of the historic concrete planters, and 5. flower gardens (where appropriate) using Alaska flora, and 6. benches (where appropriate), and 7. bird houses. Location: South side of Railway Avenue Size: .29 acres, approximately 12,632 square feet Zoning: Park SCC 7.15.025 Parks development and improvements "All developments and improvements to city -owned park facilities shall require the prior approval of the city parks and recreation director." SCC 15.10.025 Land use districts -Established, defmitions. (b) Definitions -Purpose. (12) Parks district M- "It is intended to designate park, recreation and commemorative property owned by the city, state or federal governments for recreation and other compatible public purposes." CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No 1. Comprehensive Plan (1990) X The Comprehensive Plan makes many mention of landscaping and beautification of the City and the need to enhance the parks and to preserve the historic character of Seward. 2. Strategic Plan (1999) X The Strategic Plan also encourages landscaping, beautification and protection of parks and preservation of historic sites. 3. Historic Preservation Plan (1996) X The Historic Preservation Plan naturally supports preserving historic sites and landscapes in Seward and makes mention of Hoben Park along with concerns for the (Seward) Railroad Depot, which was vacant at that time and had not yet been restored. FISCAL NOTE: There remains approximately $50,000 to complete Hoben Park as designed. Approved by Finance Department: JL= 4AcA. RECOMMENDATION• The Commission recommends that City Council choose to preserve the integrity of the tree, and proceed with a historical restoration of the landscape as it was in the 1920- 1940's period of significance. The restoration will need to be done in phases as additional funds become available. The priority for restoration should start with installation of the historic lamp posts, restoring the fountain and restoring the original fountain basin and pedestal, installing historically accurate replica fencing of a safe height along the North and West side, reconstruction of the historic concrete planters, flower gardens (where appropriate) using Alaskan flora, benches (where appropriate) and bird houses. AGENDA STATEMENT Meeting Date: 7-28-2003 From: Erin Leaders, Assistant City Clerk `zo� Agenda Item: Liquor License Renewal BACKGROUND & JUSTIFICATION: The City Council has an opportunity to object to a request for a renewal of a liquor license for AMERICAN LEGION POST #5. The City of Seward Police Department, City Utilities Department and the Kenai Peninsula Borough Finance Department have no objections to the liquor license renewal. CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST: Yes No 1. Comprehensive Plan 2. Strategic Plan —_ 3. Other X 4. Not applicable RECOMMENDATION: Non -objection to the liquor license renewal for American Legion Club Post #5. } MEMORANDUM DATE: 7-17-2003 TO: Kim Kowalski -Rogers, Finance -Leases Sue Magyar, Finance -Public Utilities Tom Clemons, Chief of Police FROM: Erin Leaders, Assistant City Clerk SUBJ: Verifying Compliance for Liquor License Renewal The following business has applied for a liquor license renewal. Please review the following business for compliance with all utilities, lease payments, and assessments. Thank you! Name Department Status Initials American Legion Club Post #5 Finance/Utilities Finance/Leases Police Chief 1� rI 00 � r ENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH 144 N. BINKLEY SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669-7599 BUSINESS (907) 262-8608 FAX (907) 262-8615 EMAIL: assemblycierk@borough.kenai.ak.us RECEIVED January 14, 2003 JAN 17 2003 Ms. Dawn Holland -Williams OFFICE OF THE Records & Licensing Supervisor CITY CLERK Alcoholic Beverage Control Board 550 W. 7th Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501-6698 Re: Application for Renewal of Liquor License Dear Ms. Holland -Williams: LINDA MURPHY, MMC BOROUGH CLERK Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough has no objection to the approval of the application(s) for renewal of the liquor license(s) for the following establishment(s), located in the City of Seward, Alaska: Club American Legion Post #5 - License #53 Restaurant / Eating Place - Public Convenience Chinook's Restaurant #3551 Packaee Store Yukon Liquor Store #1271 The Kenai Peninsula Borough Finance Department has reviewed its files and has raised no objection based on unpaid or delinquent taxes. Sincerely, Linda S. Murphy, MMC Borough Clerk cc: applicant City of Seward KPB Finance Department File S:IWTWPtOATA A"V.bc4au=W.B4EWALSM=e l in CRY-0 �. j Page 1 of 2 Erin Leaders From: "Dawn R. Holland -Williams" <dawn_holland williams�d�stoard.neb; "Kenai PS" is To: "Seward" -clerk@cityoiseward.neb; Seward (2) <assemblyclerk@bo rough.kenai. ak.us> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: ABC Board - Renewal Notification Dear Local Governing Body: We have received the following application(s) for renewal of liquor licenses) within your jurisdiction. (this was received in December, but evidence of notification has not been found) You are being notified as required by AS O4.11.520. Additional information concerning filing a "protest" by a local governing body under AS O4.11.480 is included below. Type: Club License: American Legion Post #5 File #: 03/04-53 Location: 402 5th Ave Owner: American Legion Club Post #5 Agent: Billy Chapman Phone: Mailing Address: 224-5461 PO Box 996, Seward AK 99664 We have received an application for renewal of a liquor license(s) within your jurisdiction. This is the notice as required under AS O4.11.520. Additional information concerning filing a "protest" by a local governing body under AS O4.11.480 is included in this letter. A local governing body as defined under AS 04.21.080(11) may protest the approval of an application(s) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons in support of a protest within 60 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable". Instead, in accordance with AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a forHEARING, heating THE LOCAL GOVERNINGBODYMUST 3ASSIST IN OR APPLICANT A UNDERTAKE THE DEFENSE OF ITS PROTEST. Under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS O4.11.420(b) municipalities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which prohibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please notify us and provide a certified copy of the regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. Protest under AS O4.11.480 and the prohibition of sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages as " required by zoning regulation or ordinance under AS O4.11.420(a) are two separate and distinct subjects. Please bear that in mind in responding to this � „ n 7/17/2003 Page 2 of 2 notice. AS O4.21.010(d), if applicable, requires the municipality to provide written notice to the appropriate community council(s). If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. For additional information please refer to 15 AAC 104.145, Local Governing Body Protest. Note: Applications applied for under AS O4.11.400(g), 15 AAC 104.335(a)(3), AS O4.11.090(e), and 15 AAC 104.660(e) must be approved by the governing body.